Petition before Prime Minister of India dated 23.08.2017

1 of 95
PETITION BEFORE HON’BLE THE PRIME MINISTER OF
INDIA
To
Hon'ble the Prime Minister of India
MOST RESPECFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the matter pertains to imminent
danger to life or personal liberty of the
petitioners; perjury and planned murder designed
by the nexus of Rtd. Justice Mr. S.B. Sinha of
the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and Mr.
Praveen Kumar from Indian Defense Account
Service (IDAS).
2. That the petitioners have exhausted
all legal remedy. Hence there is no legal remedy
left for the petitioners before court of law.
Therefore petition is being filed before the

2 of 95
Constitutional Head, Hon’ble the President of
India for urgent relief.
3. That the Supreme Court of India
refused to list the matter before Constitution
bench although the petition raised substantial
question of Law as to the interpretation of
Constitution is required.
4. THAT DISMISSAL ORDER DATED 14th July
2017 BY HON’BLE JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI AND HON’BLE
JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN IN M. A. NO. 84 OF 2017
ENTITLED “OM PRAKASH AND ANR VS THE REGISTRAR
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND ANR” ASSASSINATED THE
SOUL (ARTICLE 32) OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
5. That soul of the Constitution of
India (Article 32) being killed without
answering violation of Order XXXVIII of Supreme
Court Rules 2013 by the two judges bench in Writ

3 of 95
Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 and violation of
set practice procedure and rules of Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India by the registry
6. Supreme Court of India refused to
entertain a Certiorari case of SDJM Begusarai
and wrongly dismissed the Writ Petition Criminal
136 of 2016 imposing liberty upon the
petitioners to approach Patna High Court after
winning the same matter from High Court of Delhi
in 2013.
7. Supreme Court violated Order XXXVIII
of Supreme Court Rules 2013 because Rtd. Justice
S.B. Sinha is involved into this matter
indirectly and there was likelihood of bias into
this matter.
8. Supreme Court also refused to cancel
NBW dated 8th September 2011 under section 83 of

4 of 95
Cr.Pc. issued by SDJM Court No. 16 Begusarai
Bihar in Criminal Case Complaint (P) No. 5591 of
2013 and kept it secret since then and disclosed
it through RTI dated 27th
Aug 2016 and even after
the settlement of the same matter by the High
Court of Delhi on 23rd
July 2013 in MATT. APPL.
NO. 7 of 2012.
9. Hence, Supreme Court of India
shielded Judicial Magistrate of Begusarai for an
offence of perjury and illegal confinement of
petitioners since 14 years and suspended the
life and liberty of the petitioners under
Article 21 of Constitution of India.
10. Petitioners have filed six cases
before Supreme Court of India viz. Writ Petition
(Criminal) 136 of 2016; Review Petition
(Criminal) 825 of 2016; Curative Petition
(Criminal) D 41026 of 2016; Writ Petition
Criminal D NO 2188 of 2017; Writ Petition

5 of 95
(Criminal) D NO. 3913 of 2017 and M. A. 84 of
2017 for enforcement of article 21 of the
constitution of India.
11. However, all petitions have been
either dismissed without speaking order or
lodged under order XV Rule 5 of Supreme Court
Rule 2013 or withdrawn by the petitioners
because of rampant suppression of records and
denial of access to justice by Supreme Court of
India.
12. Petitioners have not approached
Supreme Court of India to impugn the Delhi High
Court Judgment or aggrieved by the Delhi High
Court Judgment.
13. Petitioners have approached Supreme
Court of India with “Life and liberty” matter
for enforcement of Article 21 of the

6 of 95
Constitution of India.
14. However, death penalty awarded
without written judicial order and without
speaking order by Supreme Court of India.
15. Is it the impact of absolutist
Government? Or Is it a process of
institutionalization of neo colonial India?
16. That there is an imminent danger
to the “Life & liberty” of a Senior
Citizen Oxygen dependent woman (herein as
petitioner No.02) from Rtd. Justice S.B.
Sinha of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India and Mr. Praveen Kumar from Indian
defense Account service(IDAS).

7 of 95
17. Her above the knee amputee
Senior Citizen husband has been encircled
to death on 15th
November 2007 which is on
the Supreme Court Record and she has been
forced to dislocate from Bihar to Delhi
and has been encircled in the same manner
to kill her and to usurp her life time
acquired property in Bihar.
18. That the petitioners have
approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India with a Certiorari case of SDJM
Begusarai for an offence of perjury and
illegal confinement of petitioners since
14 years.
19. However, the Registry and
Mentioning Officer of the Hon’ble Supreme

8 of 95
Court of India have stopped the
petitioners to mention the urgent “Life &
liberty” matter before Hon’ble the Chief
Justice of India’s Court on 03.10.2016 and
06.10.2016 respectively.
20. Aggrieved by this act of
Registry, the petitioners have filed six
cases before Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India which have been either dismissed
evading Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court
Rules 2013 or Lodged abusing vested power
under Order XV Rule 5 of Supreme Court
Rules 2013 or withdrawn by the petitioner
because of suppression of records, denial
of access to Justice by the Registry,
which has resulted in planned murder or
encounter of the petitioners.

9 of 95
21. In brief; there is violation of
set practice, procedure and rules of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by the
Registry.
22. There is evasion of Order
XXXVIII of Supreme Court Rules, 2013 by
two judges’ bench.
23. There is an abuse of power
vested under Order XV Rule 5 of Supreme
Court Rule 2013 by the Registrar.
24. There is likelihood of bias by
two judges’ bench.
25. There is an offence of perjury

10 of 95
by lower court.
26. There is an award of Capital
punishment without written Judicial Order.
27. There is rampant suppression of
records in the Office Report dated
20.10.2016 & Office Report dated
25.03.2017 by the registry.
-: DETAILED PETITION:-
28. That the petitioners are suffering
from illness and undergoing treatment with AIIMS
at New Delhi under illegal confinement in rented
accommodation without any employment at New
Delhi since 14 years.
29. That one death certificate is

11 of 95
already on the record of Supreme Court Record
and another death certificate of petitioner
no.02 is likely to be on the Supreme Court
Record. Thereafter no one will be left in her
family and her life time acquired property will
be usurped by the Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha and
his associates.
30. That the petitioner has apprised the
alleged involvement of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha
into this matter to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India through nine cases for the interlinked
subject matters with different cause of actions
for the same relief till 03.02.2017. Fourteen
year old matter, two states jurisdiction and
illegal confinement of Petitioners. (SLP(C) no.
9854/2012, SLP(C) no. 9483/2013, SLP(C) no.
19073/2013, Writ (C) 90 of 2016, Writ (Crl.) 136
of 2016, R.P. (Crl.) 825 of 2016, Curative
(Crl.) D 41026 of 2016, Writ (Crl.) D.NO.2188 of
2017 and Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 3913 of 2017).

12 of 95
31. Order of Begusarai Court in Criminal
case Complaint (P) No. 9P of 2010 is annexed
herein as Annexure P-1 (Page from 37 to 42).
32. Certified copy of reply filed by the
petitioners on 03.03.2011 before Begusarai Court
is annexed herein as Annexure P-2 (Page from 43
to 55).
33. Order dated 23.04.2012 in SLP(C) no.
9854/2012 by Supreme Court of India is annexed
SLP(C) no. 9483/2013 by Supreme Court of India
to 57).
SLP(C) no. 19073/2013 by Supreme Court of India
to 58).

13 of 95
36. Judgment dated 23.07.2013 in
MATT.APPL. No. 7 of 2012 by High Court of Delhi
to 70).
37. Order dated 18.04.2016 in Writ (C)
90 of 2016 by Supreme Court of India is annexed
38. RTI reply by Begusarai Court dated
27.08.2016 is annexed herein as Annexure P-8
(Page from 72 to 78).
39. Order dated 07.10.2016 in Writ
Petition(Criminal) 136 of 2016 by Supreme Court
of India is annexed herein as Annexure P-9 (Page
from 79 to 79).
Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 by Supreme Court
of India is annexed herein as Annexure P-10

14 of 95
41. Order dated 01.12.2016 in Review
Petition (Criminal) 825 of 2016 by Supreme Court
of India is annexed herein as Annexure P-11
Petition (Criminal)D 2188 of 2017 by Supreme
Court of India is annexed herein as Annexure P-
12 (Page from 83 to 85).
Petition (Criminal)D 3913 of 2017 by Supreme
44. Order dated 27.03.2017 in Curative
Petition(Criminal)D 41026 of 2016 by Supreme

15 of 95
46. Order dated 14.07.2017 in M. A. No.
84 of 2017 by Supreme Court of India is annexed
48. Order of Begusarai Court in Criminal
case Complaint (P) No. 5591 of 2013 is annexed
49. That the Police Complaint u/s 200
Cr.Pc. and u/s 154(3)Cr.Pc. vide diary no. 37B
dated 30.05.2016, computerized complaint no.
00081710571601332 before P.S. Palam Village,

16 of 95
South West District at New Delhi has also been
filed by the petitioners for registration of
F.I.R against Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha, Mr.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rtd. Baruni Refinery
employee and Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS)& CMD of
IDPL at New Delhi. However, police has not
registered F.I.R against the accused so far.
50. That the petitioner has filed
W.P.(C) 90 of 2016 before this Hon’ble Court
against Mr. Praveen Kumar(IDAS) for illegal
termination of service without payment of wages
which has been dismissed on 18.04.2016 by this
Hon’ble Court. However, the same has been
registered as letter petition and pending under
Supreme Court Grievance Management System vide
D.NO.2206 since 16.01.2016. Mr. Praveen Kumar
(IDAS) & CMD of IDPL, Scope Complex, Lodhi Road
New Delhi has not let the petitioner no.01 to
work and kept him without work for one month at
Head Office and dismissed him with mala fide
intention and kept him under house arrest

17 of 95
without any work since 2014 to till date. It is
pertinent to mention here that the petitioners
are residing in rented accommodation at New
Delhi without any employment. Mr. Praveen Kumar
(IDAS) & his associates have hit all the BASIC
NEEDS of petitioners in Bihar as well as in
Delhi so that the petitioner no.01 & 02 could
not survive in this world, which has been
apprised and filed as written mentioning of
arguments vide D.NO.28889 dated 08.04.2016 in
W.P.(C) 90 of 2016.
51. That an offence of perjury has been
committed by Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS) & CMD of
IDPL through Written Statement (WS) dated
07.09.2015 filed before Patiala House Court at
New Delhi which has been annexed as Annexure P-
42 (page from 223 to 248) in VOL-I in W.P.(C) 90
of 2016. Perjury has been exposed by the
petitioner through replication dated 04.11.2015
which has been annexed as Annexure P-53 (page
from 343 to 386) in VOL-II in W.P.(C) 90 of

18 of 95
2016.
52. That the petitioner has placed the
names of thirty six bad elements of Center and
State Government’s apparatus alleged associates
of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India on the record of SCR with
material evidence in Writ (C) 90 of 2016; Writ
(Crl.) 136 of 2016; Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of
2017 and Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 3913 of 2017 filed so
far before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
53. That the petitioner has also
apprised Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India
through letters via R&I department of Supreme
Court of India vide diary no.15411 dated
01.04.2017; vide diary no. 16879 dated
10.04.2017 and vide diary no. 18543 dated
17.04.2017.
54. That the Grievance Management System
of Supreme Court of India has registered total

19 of 95
eleven grievances of petitioners as letter
petition so far vide D.NO. 2206 dated
09.01.2016; vide D.NO.35529 dated 19.08.2016;
vide D.NO. 43126 dated 08.10.2016; vide D.NO.
47003 dated 13.10.2016; vide D.NO. 47004 dated
13.10.2016; vide D.NO. 50548 dated 21.10.2016;
vide D.NO. 3179 dated 12.01.2017; vide D.NO. 3185
dated 17.01.2017; vide D.NO. 20578 dated
25.02.2017; vide D.NO. 17135 dated 08.04.2017;
vide D.NO. 17748 dated 17.04.2017 which are
either pending or disposed of without any relief
in the garb of lame excuses like “letter
petition does not cover under PIL guidelines or
digitally not signed or tempering the name of
applicant from Om Prakash to ABCD against D.NO.
20578”.
55. That the Central Information
Commission (CIC) at New Delhi has registered and
admitted six second appeals and one complaint
u/s 18 of RTI Act 2005 vide F.NO.
CIC/SS/A/2013/901846-SA; vide F.NO.

20 of 95
CIC/DLJLA/A/2017/183721 dated 20.01.2017; vide
F.NO. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/113204 dated 06.03.2017;
vide F.NO. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/122864 dated
26.04.2017; vide F.NO. CIC/CICOM/A/2017/119689
dated 27.04.2017; vide F.NO.
CIC/CICOM/A/2017/126308 dated 01.05.2017 and
complaint vide F.NO.CIC/MOLAJ/C/2016/299945
dated 28.11.2016 against different cause actions
for the interlinked same subject matters and for
the same relief. The cause of actions for Second
Appeal arose against Withdrawal of Legal Aid
Services by Delhi High Court Legal Service
Committee (DHCLSC) without prior intimation;
refusal to reply or supply of false and
misleading information by Dept of Legal Affairs,
Government of India and Law Department Bihar;
refusal to reply against suppression of records
in the office report in W.P.(Crl.) 136 of 2016;
violation of set practice, procedure and rules
by the Registrar Misc. of Supreme Court of India
in the garb of Judicial Order or interpretation
of Law; refusal to reply and transfer physically

21 of 95
the online RTI request by Department of Legal
Affairs, Ministry of Law & Justice Government of
India pertaining to two States jurisdictions to
the concerned PIO u/s 6(3)(i)(ii) of RTI Act to
which the subject matter closely connected with;
refusal to reply against refusal of registration
of Writ petition Criminal D.NO. 2188 of 2017
entitled “Om Prakash & Anr VS. Union of India &
Ors” before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in
the garb of Judicial Order or interpretation of
Law; Non-Implementation of section 7(1) of RTI
Act by Central Registry, CIC New Delhi and Non-
disclosure of Complaint information concerning
“Life and Liberty” at the website of CIC, New
Delhi. The cause of action for Complaint u/s 18
of RTI Act 2005 arose against Patna High Court
for no reply by FAA and supply of false and
misleading information by PIO. However, out of
six second appeals, CIC has announced only one
decision on 25.09.2014 so far, which has also
not been complied either by Delhi State Legal
Services Authority or by Delhi High Court Legal

22 of 95
Service Committee (DHCLSC) as on date.
56. That an Offence of PERJURY; abuse of
court process; 14 years long criminal
conspiracy; illegal confinement under house
arrest; backstabbing; evasion of rule of law by
the Advocates and Judges from lower court to
High Court to Supreme Court of India; NO ACTUAL
PARTY ONLY PROXY WAR THROUGH JUDGES IN TWO
STATES from Lower Court to High Court to Supreme
Court of India and Nine Cases have reached up to
Supreme Court of India till 03.02.2017 are the
main features of the whole petition.
57. That the Registrar Misc. is habitual
and consistently involved in denying access to
justice and planned murder/encounter of
petitioners since 03.10.2016 by way of
suppressing record, tempering record,
circulating unregistered interlocutory
applications for Constitution bench, Lodging

23 of 95
petitions, circulating wrong office report
before Hon’ble Judges, circulating half
information before Hon’ble Judges and
circulating her own communications/letters only
and suppressing the communications/reply of the
petitioners in the office report before Hon’ble
Judges to shield/defend herself by the Hon’ble
Judges and to offend/victimize petitioners as of
now.
58. That the Registrar Misc. has
suppressed the factual record in office report
dated 20.10.2016 in Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 and
in Office report dated 25.03.2017 in Curative
(Crl.)D 41026 of 2016. Interlocutory Application
vide D.NO.74930 dated 03.10.2016 for urgent
mentioning of the matter before Hon’ble the
Chief Justice of India’s Court in office report
dated 20.10.2016 in Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 has
been suppressed. Interlocutory applications vide
D.NO.77878 dated 18.10.2016 for Constitution
bench has been circulated unregistered in Writ

24 of 95
(Crl.) 136 of 2016. The reply of petitioner
dated 23.03.2017 against the Notification of
defects dated 23.03.2017 by the Registrar has
been suppressed in Office report dated
25.03.2017 in Curative (Crl.)D 41026 of 2016
against which RTI vide JUSTC/R/2017/50390 dated
26.03.2017 and First Appeal vide Appeal
No.179/2017 have been filed by the petitioners.
The First Appeal has been heard by Mr. Sanjay
Parihar, Ld. Registrar (J-IV) cum FAA, Supreme
Court of India on 01.06.2017. Moreover, the
Registrar Misc. has neither supplied nor
uploaded Office report dated 30.11.2016 in
Review Petition (Crl.) 825 of 2016 as on date.
RTI vide JUSTC/R/2017/50412 dated 30.03.2017 has
been filed for obtaining Office report dated
30.11.2016 in Review Petition (Crl.) 825 of 2016
by the petitioners.
59. That Judicial order being reversed
from 03.04.2017 to 22.03.2017 by SDJM Ms Meena

25 of 95
Kumari, CJM Division, Begusarai under the
Judicature of Patna High Court at the behest of
Supreme Court of India.
60. That three updates of order sheet by
Begusarai Court dated 09.01.2017, 15.02.2017 and
30.03.2017 are evident of this fact that
Judicial Murder is planned and designed from the
Supreme Court of India. Case Updates at
Begusarai Court dated 09.01.2017, 15.02.2017 and
30.03.2017 are annexed with application of
urgent hearing D.NO.45930 dated 05.06.2017
before Supreme Court of India.
61. That first update on 09.01.2017.
(Date of Hearing 02.01.2017. Next Date of
Hearing Not updated). Second update on
15.02.2017.( Next Date of Hearing 03.04.2017).
Third update on 30.03.2017. (Date of Hearing
22.03.2017. Next Date of Hearing 03.07.2017).

26 of 95
62. That these three updates by CJM
division Begusarai raises substantial question
of Law. How 22.03.2017 became the date of
hearing all of sudden while the date of hearing
was already fixed for 03.04.2017? Who tempered
the data at the e-court website? How Judicial
order being reversed from 03.04.2017 to
22.03.2017?
63. That the answers of these questions
are interlinked with the proceedings of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Because in
Supreme Court, Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of
2016 was forcibly listed by Registrar before
Hon'ble Justice Navin Sinha for direction on
27.03.2017. Because on 23.03.2017 the Registry
had Notified defects to remove Prayer(b) from
the Withdrawal Application of Curative
(Criminal) D 41026 of 2016. The Petitioner had
refused to remove the same at this Stage. The
Petitioner had reverted back the Registry on the
same date that he would not remove Prayer (b)

27 of 95
from Withdrawal Application of Curative
(Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 AT THIS STAGE. Hence,
it was planned from Supreme Court and off the
record/confidential/indirect direction being
given from Supreme Court of India, therefore
scheduled date of hearing was changed all of
sudden from 03.04.2017 to 22.03.2017 by Ld. SDJM
Ms Meena Kumari, CJM Division, Begusarai under
the Judicature of Patna High Court. In nutshell,
whatever is happening at CJM division Begusarai
is Pre-Planned and being designed at the behest
of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha and his associates
from Supreme Court of India.
64. That the petitioner has filed the
clarification with reasons against biased
Judiciary as to why the matter not to be listed
before Hon’ble Justice Ranjan Gagoi, Hon’ble
Justice Prafulla Chandra Pant, Hon’ble Justice
Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Hon’ble Justice Uday Umesh
Lalit and Hon’ble Justice Navin Sinha vide

28 of 95
D.NO.42137 dated 19.05.2017 against the
Notification of defect vide D.NO.840/2017/X
dated 16.05.2017 in Crl. M.P. D.NO.17593 of 2017
in W.P.(Crl.)D.NO. 3913 of 2017 issued by the
Registrar Misc of this Hon’ble Court.
65. That the actual respondent has NOT
filed a single piece of paper throughout the
case from Trial Court to High Court of Delhi.
66. That the Hon’ble Judges have played
a role of respondents throughout the case.
67. That the matter has been settled by
the High Court of Delhi in MATT.APPL. 7 of 2012
on 23.07.2013 with NO COST on the ground of
certified copy of Begusarai court in Bihar and
after SLP(C) no. 9854/2012, SLP(C) no.
9483/2013, SLP(C) no. 19073/2013 before this
Hon’ble Court. Application for early hearing
with receipt of delivery report of NOTICE of
motion vide ED881673094IN dated 29.04.2013 is

29 of 95
already on the record of SLP(C) No. 19073 of
2013 at page no. 165 to 169 annexed as Annexure
P-22 in the same petition. The service affidavit
with proof of delivery receipt of ED986320975IN
dated 08.12.2012 has also been put on the record
of High Court of Delhi on 22.01.2013 vide diary
no. 2376.
68. That the actual respondent has filed
two Criminal cases with two N.B.W before the CJM
division Begusarai Bihar and has supplied the
record of only one Criminal case with N.B.W to
the Trial Court at New Delhi on 09.02.2011 and
has concealed another Criminal case with
criminal intention. First Criminal case u/s D.V.
Act dated 30.03.2010 with N.B.W. dated
25.08.2010 and another criminal case u/s 498A
dated 07.02.2011 with N.B.W. dated 08.09.2011.
First one has been closed while second one has
been kept secret and has been disclosed through
RTI dated 27.08.2016. Application for
cancellation of N.B.W dated 25.08.2010 and

30 of 95
replication to Criminal case Complaint No. 9P of
2010 u/s D.V. Act has been filed by the
petitioners dated 03.03.2011 before CJM division
Begusarai are already on the record of SLP(C)
No. 19073 of 2013 at page no. 29 to 46 annexed
as Annexure P-2(Colly)in the same petition.
69. That Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
has evaded the Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court
Rules 2013 in Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 and
dismissed the same imposing liberty upon the
petitioners to approach High Court.
70. That the petition raised substantial
question of Law as to the interpretation of
Constitution is required. Two states of
jurisdictions are involved for the same cause of
action and for the same relief. After winning
from High Court of Delhi petitioner is being
directed to approach Patna High Court for the
same cause of action and for the same relief.

31 of 95
71. That aggrieved by this, the
petitioner has filed Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of
2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF
INDIA & ORS” with Nine Prayers and nine reliefs
which has been Lodged by the Registrar dated
28.01.2017 by this Hon’ble Court.
72. That the petitioner in Writ (Crl.)
D.NO. 2188 of 2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR
VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS” claiming relief of
Mandamus or prohibition or certiorari in respect
of cancellation of N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 issued
u/s 83 Cr.Pc. against the petitioners and
quashing the Criminal Case Complaint (P) No.
5591 of 2013 u/s 498A of IPC. The petitioners
also seek the dismissal and imprisonment against
the concerned Magistrate and Women Protection
Officer for an offence of perjury and illegal
confinement of the petitioners. The petitioners
also seek the removal of the legal aid Advocates
from the empanelment of the legal Aid
Institutions who were associated with the case

32 of 95
of the petitioners from the Trial Court to this
Hon’ble Court. The petitioners also seek
cancellation of registration no. 836/1991 of
Advocate Gopal Kumar and husband of Women
protection officer registered under Bihar State
Bar Council for an offence of perjury and seek
Rs. 50 Lakh as compensation for causing them
irreparable damage, loss and illegal
confinement. The petitioners also seek dismissal
against Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS) and seek Rs. 50
Lakh as compensation for an offence of perjury
and keeping them captive and house arrest
illegally and causing them irreparable damage
and loss.
73. That under the above noted
circumstances Registrar of Hon’ble Supreme Court
of India has stopped the petitioners to agitate
the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of
India and spoiled the genuine nine reliefs of
petitioners prayed in Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of

33 of 95
2017.
74. That the husband of petitioner no.
02 has been encircled to death and the death
certificate of the husband of petitioner no.02
is already on the record of SLP(C) NO. 9854 of
2012 at page no. 18 to 22 annexed as Annexure P-
1; SLP(C) NO. 9483 of 2013 at page no. 18 to 22
annexed as Annexure P-1(Colly) and SLP(C) NO.
19073 of 2013 at page no. 24 to 28 annexed as
Annexure P-1(Colly) in the same petition. The
death certificate of petitioner no.02 is likely
to be on the SCR. Thereafter no one will be left
in her family and her life time acquired
property will be usurped by the Rtd. Justice
S.B. Sinha and his associates.
75. That the illiterate, before
independence born petitioner no.02 has earned
her property through ploughing her own
agricultural land, doing domestic household
works at her neighborhood and selling cow dung.

34 of 95
She is emotionally attached to her property and
wants to die at her own house not in Delhi.
However, she is being stopped to visit her own
house since two years due to disclosure of
N.B.W. u/s 83 Cr.Pc through RTI dated
27.08.2016. Hence, freedom of movement across
Indian Territory has been infringed by the Lower
Court under the Judicature of Patna High Court.
76. That the present application
contains the evidence against suppression of
records, denial of access to justice and planned
judicial murder/encounter designed by the
Supreme Court of India.
PRAYER
In the above premises, it is prayed that Hon’ble
the Prime Minister of India may be pleased:
(i) To protect the violation of
Constitution by the Supreme Court of
India because of the association or

35 of 95
closeness of judge with the subject
matter of dispute.
(ii) To impeach the concerned Judges for
issuing Non Bail able Warrant (N.B.W.)
dated 08.09.2011 u/s 83 Cr.Pc. in
Criminal case Complaint (P) no. 5591
of 2013 at SDJM Court No.16 Begusarai
Bihar and keeping it secret since then
even after the on record intimation to
the CJM Division Begusarai in the same
matter Criminal case Complaint (P) no.
9P of 2010 dated 03.03.2011 and after
the settlement of the same matter by
the High Court of Delhi in MATT.APPL.
7 of 2012 on 23.07.2013.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
Om Prakash
Petitioner No.01
On behalf of Petitioner No.02

36 of 95
S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
Rented R/O RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar, Part-2, Palam Colony,
New Delhi-110077
Mob: 9968337815
Email: om.poddar@gmail.com
Widow Asha Rani Devi
Petitioner No.02
W/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
R/O ASHA DEEP NIWAS
Shukkar Hatt, Near Durga Mandir
Sonaili, Katihar, Bihar-855114
NEW DELHI:
Filed on: 23.08.2017
Diary No:

Petition before Prime Minister of India dated 23.08.2017

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Petition before Prime Minister of India dated 23.08.2017

Similar to Petition before Prime Minister of India dated 23.08.2017 (20)

More from Om Prakash Poddar

More from Om Prakash Poddar (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Petition before Prime Minister of India dated 23.08.2017