The document discusses the historical and scriptural evidence supporting the resurrection of Jesus Christ, addressing common roadblocks and objections to its validity. It emphasizes the reliability of New Testament accounts, early creeds, and multiple attestations as critical for proving the resurrection's historicity. The author argues that the resurrection hypothesis is more plausible than alternative explanations and highlights the significant consensus among scholars regarding the empty tomb and subsequent witness testimonies.

1. “Jesus died on the cross for our sins” is an objective truth STATEMENT.Determining its truth, and whether we believe it or not, connects the objective event with the subjective knowledge.An Objective Clarification from Last Week

2. Defense of the Resurrection from History and ScriptureThe Empty Tomb

3. ChristCosmologicalTeleologicalTranscendentalChristAmbassador

4. How is the resurrection often viewed by those whom you have had conversation?What are the roadblocks you encounter when talking about the argument for Christ’s resurrection?Some Questions…

5. Scripture is FaultyJesus was a myth, never existed, and/or invented deity status by disciples or monks centuries later.Miracles do not existMaterialist assumption, circular reasoning.Would require an argument towards the existence of an intervening God. Groundwork required.History is unique, non-repeatable events, similar to miracles.Two Major Roadblocks

6. Defense of New Testament Scriptures (External)Consistent and Early CreedsReliable TestimonyDefense of the Historicity of the Resurrection (Internal)Consistent ClaimsEmpty TombMartyrs’ DeathWhere we are going

7. Early AttestationNear parameter of event.Early Manuscripts.Eyewitness TestimonyAccounts of Eye Witness testimony from author or associate.Reliability Multiple AttestationIndependent concuranceLarge Manuscript evidence.Parameters of Good History

8. Reliability of ScriptureAnswers “Jesus as a myth” QuestionExternal Evidence

9. Consistent and Early Creeds

10. 1Now, brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. 2By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. 3For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5and that he appeared to Peter, and then to the Twelve. 6After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. 7Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, 8and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born. Earliest Resurrection Creed

11. To the Eyewitness testimony:3 Gospels utilizing similar reference material, but separate in observation so as to rule out collusion.1 Gospel utilizing separate source material, yet maintaining credible consistency.To the Manuscripts themselves:5,000 extant manuscripts have been found, dating back to the 2nd century.98-99% accuracy throughout the copying process Multiple Attestations

12. Unknown Gospel150 AD

13. Accurately references the four canonical gospels

14. Early evidence of a catechismCodex Sinaiticus330 AD

15. Complete Old and New Testament with some extra canonical writings.The consensus amongst Biblical scholars is that the Disciples had a powerful experience of the risen Christ.75% of the surveyed scholars accept one or more arguments for the historicity of the empty tomb. The remaining 25% accept one or more arguments against the early church's knowledge of an empty tomb.Scholarship

16. Examination of the DocumentsAnswers the “Disciples were lying/deceived” QuestionInternal Evidence

17. After his crucifixion, Jesus was buried in a tomb by Joseph of Arimathea.Both the Jews and the Christians would have known where the tomb was.Christians would not readily make up a story about a Jew giving Jesus a proper burial.The gospels converge during the death and resurrection accounts, implying early source gathering.Location of the Tomb

18. Not a figurative resurrection, but a physical one.1 Cor. 15 Passage makes this clearThe response from the rabbinical class was that the disciples had stolen the body, implying from a non-Christian party that the tomb was empy.Christians were scattering and defeated at the time of the empty tomb.Empty Tomb

19. His appearance to Peter is independently attested by Luke, to the Twelve by Luke and John. We also have independent witness to Galilean appearances in Mark, Matthew, and John, As well as to the women in Matthew and John.Conversion of James and his brothers.Eyewitnesses to Jesus

20. Women were first as witnesses.Goes against the idea of construing credibility.Disciples were not very with it.Repeatedly revealed to be argumentative, dull, and unfaithful on numerous occasions.Disciples were martyred and defamed for their belief.Lies and deceptions don’t normally cause strict adherence to a belief unto death.Personal Embarrassment

21. C. B. McCullagh lists six tests which historians use in determining what is the best explanation for given historical facts. The hypothesis “God raised Jesus from the dead” passes all these tests:1. It has great explanatory scope: it explains why the tomb was found empty, why the disciples saw post-mortem appearances of Jesus, and why the Christian faith came into being.Justifying Historical Descriptions

22. 2. It has great explanatory power: it explains why the body of Jesus was gone, why people repeatedly saw Jesus alive despite his earlier public execution, and so forth.3. It is plausible: given the historical context of Jesus’ own unparalleled life and claims, the resurrection serves as divine confirmation of those radical claims.4. It is not ad hoc or contrived: it requires only one additional hypothesis: that God exists. And even that needn’t be an additional hypothesis if one already believes that God exists.Justifying Historical Descriptions

23. 4. It is not ad hoc or contrived: it requires only one additional hypothesis: that God exists. And even that needn’t be an additional hypothesis if one already believes that God exists.5. It is in accord with accepted beliefs. The hypothesis: “God raised Jesus from the dead” doesn’t in any way conflict with the accepted belief that people don’t rise naturally from the dead. The Christian accepts that belief as wholeheartedly as he accepts the hypothesis that God raised Jesus from the dead.6. It far outstrips any of its rival hypotheses in meeting conditions (1)-(5). Down through history various alternative explanations of the facts have been offered, for example, the conspiracy hypothesis, the apparent death hypothesis, the hallucination hypothesis, and so forth. Such hypotheses have been almost universally rejected by contemporary scholarship. None of these naturalistic hypotheses succeeds in meeting the conditions as well as the resurrection hypothesis.Justifying Historical Descriptions

24. In no other case is the interval of time between the composition of the book and the date of the earliest extant manuscripts so short as in that of the New Testament.Fredrick G. Kenyon, Director of the British LibraryThe evidence for the resurrection is better than for claimed miracles in any other religion. It's outstandingly different in quality and quantity.Antony FlewNoteworthy Quote