This document provides an overview of lecture 13 on contract law, which covers consideration and intention. It includes a reading list, list of relevant case law, and preparatory questions. The learning outcomes are to understand consideration and its importance; distinguish between unilateral and bilateral contracts; explain privity of contract and intention to create legal relations; become familiar with contract law terminology; and apply legal principles and case law to hypothetical scenarios.

1. Foundation Law 2013/14
Lecture 13
Contract Law (2)
Reading List:
Jacqueline Martin, “GCSE Law”, 5th
edition, Chapter 31-Contract: Consideration and Intention
(pages 247-251 only)
Cases:
• Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1892)
• Dunlop v Selfridge Ltd (1915)
• Chappell & Co v Nestle Co. Ltd (1960)
• White v Bluett (1853)
• Williams v Roffey
• Re McArdle (1951)
• Lampleigh v Braithwaite (1615)
• Rose and Frank Co. v JR Crompton (1923)
• Balfour v Balfour (1919)
• Merritt v Merritt (1970)
• Jones v Padavatton (1969)
Preparatory Questions for Seminar 13:
1. What is consideration and why is this element considered to be so important in contract law?
2. Tom promises to give Jerry £50 for his birthday but then decides not to. Can Jerry enforce the
promise?
3. Explain what a bilateral and unilateral contract is.
4. Under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, in which circumstances may a third
party sue for breach of contract?
Turn Over
1
Learning Outcomes:
 Be able to explain what is “consideration” and its importance in contract law;
 Show knowledge and understanding of unilateral and bilateral contracts;
 Explain the doctrine of privity of contract;
 Show awareness of intention to create legal relations;
 Become familiar with contract law terminology;
 Apply legal principles to given facts and demonstrate criticality & analysis when answering fact
based questions; and
 Analyse case law and be able to apply case law in a persuasive manner to hypothetical case studies.

2. Foundation Law 2013/14
5. With respect to business agreements, what is the presumption taken by the courts with regards
to intention to create legal relations?
6. With respect to social/domestic agreements, what is the presumption taken by the courts with
regards to intention to create legal relations? Use case law to explain your answer.
2