The document describes three examples of potential criminal acts and asks to identify the type of mens rea, or guilty mind, shown in each based on case law. The first example involves a young girl being struck by airgun pellets fired from an apartment, where the appellant claimed they were just seeing how far they would go. The second involves a student accidentally pouring acid from a boiling tube into a hand dryer, injuring another student. The third involves a woman intentionally driving her car into her cheating lover, seriously injuring him.

2. 5619751452880Unknown to the science teacher in charge, a student went out of the lesson and took with him a boiling tube of concentrated acid. He went into one of the toilets. He then heard footsteps outside in the corridor, panicked and poured the acid into the hot air dryer, the nozzle of which was pointing upwards. He intended to return later to deal with the acid in the dryer. However, sometime later another student went to the toilet to wash his hands. He turned on the dryer. The acid was ejected onto his forehead and trickled down the right side of his nose. It caused a permanent scar. (Based on DPP v. K (1990).

3. 4219575422910A young woman was upset with her lover, who had been cheating on her with his secretary. She decided she would get revenge. She waited for him outside his office in her car and drove into him, knocking him down. He was seriously injured.