The document summarizes concepts related to online communities and virtual communities. It discusses key elements that contribute to a sense of virtual community, such as membership, boundaries, influence, support and shared identities. It also covers imagined communities, self-organizing interaction systems, and notes that social networking sites alone do not necessarily constitute communities, but that communities can form within social networks. It provides examples analyzing data on reciprocity and the most active users on Twitter.

1. ONLINE FÆLLESSKABER

2. DAGENS FORELÆSNING

3. DAGENS FORELÆSNING
1.Opsamling på sidste uge
De studerende fremlægger deres findings.
2.Community v. Janus
3.Pause
4.Gruppearbejde, case
5.Diskussion

4. OPSAMLING PÅ SIDSTE GANG

5. COMMUNITY

7. VIRTUAL SETTLEMENT

8. SENSE OF VIRTUAL
COMMUNITY

9. SENSE OF VIRTUAL
COMMUNITY
• Membership, boundaries, belonging
and group symbols

10. SENSE OF VIRTUAL
COMMUNITY
• Membership, boundaries, belonging
and group symbols
• Influence in terms of enforcing and
challenging norms

11. SENSE OF VIRTUAL
COMMUNITY
• Membership, boundaries, belonging
and group symbols
• Influence in terms of enforcing and
challenging norms
• Exchange of support among members

12. SENSE OF VIRTUAL
COMMUNITY
• Membership, boundaries, belonging
and group symbols
• Influence in terms of enforcing and
challenging norms
• Exchange of support among members
• Shared emotional connections among
members

13. BAYMS VERSION

14. BAYMS VERSION
• Sense of space

15. BAYMS VERSION
• Sense of space
• Shared practice

16. BAYMS VERSION
• Sense of space
• Shared practice
• Shared resources and support

17. BAYMS VERSION
• Sense of space
• Shared practice
• Shared resources and support
• Shared identities

18. BAYMS VERSION
• Sense of space
• Shared practice
• Shared resources and support
• Shared identities
• Interpersonal relationships

19. SELVORGANISERENDE
INTERAKTIONSSYSTEMER
Tække (2006): Mediesociografi
(http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/17825022/mediesociografi)

20. SELVORGANISERENDE
INTERAKTIONSSYSTEMER
ytring
Tække (2006): Mediesociografi
(http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/17825022/mediesociografi)

21. SELVORGANISERENDE
INTERAKTIONSSYSTEMER
ytring
ytring
Tække (2006): Mediesociografi
(http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/17825022/mediesociografi)

22. SELVORGANISERENDE
INTERAKTIONSSYSTEMER
ytring ytring
ytring
ytring
ytring
ytring
ytring
ytring ytring ytring
ytring
ytring
ytring
ytring
ytring
ytring
Tække (2006): Mediesociografi
(http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/17825022/mediesociografi)

23. IMAGINED COMMUNITIES
En følelse af fællesskab

24. It is imagined because the members of even the smallest nation will
never know most of their fellow-members, meet them, or even hear of
them, yet in the minds of each lives the image of their communion... In
fact, all communities larger than primordial villages of face-to-face
contact (and perhaps even these) are imagined. Communities are to be
distinguished, not by their falsity/genuineness, but by the style in which
they are imagined. – Benedict Anderson

25. imagined selvorganiserende virtual community
community interaktionssystem SOC/SOVC
grad af forpligtelse

26. sense of
belonging imagined selvorganiserende virtual community
community interaktionssystem SOC/SOVC
selvorganiserende
interaktionssystem
grad af forpligtelse

27. sense of
belonging imagined selvorganiserende virtual community
community interaktionssystem SOC/SOVC
selvorganiserende
interaktionssystem
virtual settlement
grad af forpligtelse

28. ONLINE FÆLLESSKABER
Netværk Imagined community
Selvorganiserende interaktionssystem
(weak ties) (strong ties) (no ties)
Sense of
virtual community

31. socialt netværkssite ≠ community

32. socialt netværkssite ≠ community
...web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-
public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with
whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of
connections and those made by others within the system. The nature and
nomenclature of these connections may vary from site to site.
- Boyd & Ellison

34. ...ikke et fællesskab

35. ...ikke et fællesskab
Men du kan godt skabe fællesskaber inden for et socialt
netværkssite

37. ...top users by the number of followers in Twitter are mostly
celebrities and mass media and most of them do not follow their
followers back. In fact Twitter shows a low level of reciprocity;
77.9% of user pairs with any link between them are connected
one-way, and only 22.1% have reciprocal relationship between
them. (...)Previous studies have reported much higher reciprocity
on other social networking services: 68% on Flickr and 84% on
Yahoo! 360 – Kwak, Lee, Moon, & Park, 2010

38. Kun 3% af alle brugere har
opdateret mere end 1000 gange,
de såkaldte snakke- hoveder. Og
af disse “talking heads” står de
mest aktive 319 talking heads
tilsam- men for halvdelen af alle
tweets lavet af samtlige 20.000
danske twittere, mao. de mest
aktive 1,6% af alle danske twittere
har stået for halvdelen af alle
tweets! – Bøgh-Andersen, Overskrift.dk

41. Bøgh-Andersen, Overskrift.dk