SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 20
Download to read offline
Nuclear Reactions
Some Basics
II. Reaction Kinematics
Reaction Kinematics
• A beam incident on a target will result in many different reactions,
including elastic and inelastic scattering, representing different collisions
of beam particles with different nuclei.
• To isolate a specific reaction (to measure, e.g., its cross section or some
other prediction of theory), in addition to identifying the correct particles
involved, we need to “look” at the right place, i.e. isolate products moving
in the “correct” momentum (i.e. energy and direction).
• To assist in identifying the correct energy and direction of emitted
particles, we utilize the kinematics of the reaction, i.e. the predictions of:
– Conservation of energy
– Conservation of linear momentum
for this reaction (for CEBAF energies, must use relativistic expressions)
• Two-body kinematics
– Used when two particles are present in the “final state” (i.e. after collision)
• Three-body kinematics
– Used when three particles are present in the final state
Two-Body Kinematics
Elastic Scattering in a plane (non-relativistic)
p1
K1
m2
m1
K1’
P2’
K2’
θ1’
m2
P1’
m1
θ2’
Given initial state: m1, m2, p1, p2=0
Find final state: K1’, K2’, θ2’, θ2’
• Recall: K = ½ mv2, p = mv, K = p2/2m
• Only relevant physics laws are conservation of energy and momentum
• Conservation of Energy: K1 = K1’ + K2’ (1)
• Conservation of Momentum: p1 = p1’cosθ1’ + p2’cosθ2’ (2)
0 = p1’sinθ1’ - p2’sinθ2’ (3)
• We have 3 equations, and 4 unknowns (K1’,K2’, θ1’ ,θ2’)
• Therefore K’s and θ’s are not uniquely determined
• If given one of the final state variables we can calculate the other three
Two-Body Kinematics
Elastic Scattering in a plane (non-relativistic)
Some Observations
• If the initial conditions (m1, m2, , =0) are known in an actual elastic
scattering experiment, and if a final state particle is chosen to be detected at an
angle θ1, two-body kinematics determine a unique angle θ2 at which the other
particle will emerge as well as both kinetic energies.
• Said differently, if two detectors are to detect particles corresponding to a single
elastic scattering event, they have to be placed at “conjugate” angles, i.e.
angles related through two-body kinematics
• Note: A single elastic scattering event (labeled A) detected at conjugate angles
(θ1, θ2)A is represented by a single point on a plot of K1’ vs. K2‘ . For the same
initial conditions, another event with particles detected at a different set of
conjugate angles (θ1, θ2)B will produce a different combination of K1’ and K2’
and will be represented by a different single point (labeled B) on the same plot.
1
p
r
2
p
r
K2’
K1’
A
B
Two-Body Kinematics
Elastic Scattering (Relativistic)
• Conservation of (total) Energy (here use c =1):
E1 + m2 = E1’ + E2’ (1)
• Conservation of Momentum:
p1 = p1’cosθ1’ + p2’cosθ2’(2)
0 = p1’sinθ1’ - p2’sinθ2’ (3)
• Recall: E1 = K1 + m1 and E1
2 = p1
2 +m1
2
E1’ = K1’ + m1 and E1’2 = p1’2 +m1
2
E2’ = K2’ + m2 and E2’2 = p2’2 +m2
2
• Solve (1), (2), (3) for K1’, K2’, θ2’
p1
K1
m2
m1
K1’
P2’
K2’
θ1’
m2
P1’
m1
θ2’
Given: m1, m2, K1, θ1’
Find: K1’, K2’, θ2’
Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics
Elastic Scattering – Results (1)
( ) ( )
[ ]
( )
[ ]
( ) ( )
[ ]
( )
[ ]
( ) ( ) ( )
2
1
'
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
'
1
2
1
'
2
'
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
'
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
'
2
1
2
1
2
'
2
'
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
'
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
'
1
1
2
1
1
'
1
ρ
1
θ
cot
ρ
1
γ
ρ
ρ
cotθ
ρ
ρ
1
cotθ
θ
cos
p
m
E
2
θ
cos
p
m
E
4m
A
cosθ
p
m
E
A
E
θ
cos
p
m
E
2
θ
cos
p
m
E
4m
A
cosθ
p
m
E
A
E
−
+
−
+
±
+
−
=
−
+
−
+
−
±
+
=
−
+
−
+
−
±
+
=
Where A1, A2, ρ1, ρ2, γ are given by:
Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics
Elastic Scattering – Results (2)
( )
( )
( ) ( )
[ ]
( ) ( )
[ ]
( )
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
cm
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
m
2E
m
m
m
E
c
v
1
1
γ
p
m
E
4m
A
m
E
p
A
ρ
p
m
E
4m
A
m
E
p
A
ρ
K
m
m
m
m
2
A
K
m
m
m
m
2
A
+
+
+
=
−
=
−
+
−
+
=
−
+
−
+
=
+
+
=
+
+
=
Interactive program that calculate 2-body kinematics:
http://www.calstatela.edu/academic/nuclear_physics/2bdkin.html
Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics
Elastic Scattering - Observations
• Note: Not any θ1, θ2 pairs are possible in two-body kinematics
– Square root in E1, E2 must be > 0
• Note: If m1 = m2 then θ1’ + θ2’ < π/2 (unlike classical mechanics)
• Interactive program that calculate 2-body kinematics:
– http://www.calstatela.edu/academic/nuclear_physics/2bdkin.html
( )
[ ]
( )
[ ]
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
'
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
'
1
2
p
4m
K
2m
m
m
4m
A
θ
sin
p
4m
K
2m
m
m
4m
A
θ
sin
+
+
−
≤
+
+
−
≤
Three-Body Kinematics
Nuclear Reaction (Relativistic)
mT
K1’
P2’
K2’
θ1’
P1’
m1
θ2’
m2
po
Ko
mo
θ3’
mR
PR
KR
• Conservation of energy and momentum hold again.
Eo + mT = E1’ + E2’ + ER’ (1)
po = p1’cosθ1’ + p2’cosθ2’ + pRcosθ3’ (2)
0 = p1’sinθ1’ - p2’sinθ2’ + pRsinθ3’ (3)
– In addition, but ignore for now, there may be “out-of-plane” (φ) momentum
components
• Here we have 3 equations and 6 unknowns (E1’, E2’, ER’, θ1’, θ2’, θ3’)
• Need to know 3 variables in the final state to compute everything else
Computing
Relativistic Three-Body Kinematics
• Will not solve analytically expressions for unknowns here.
• Go to:
http://www.calstatela.edu/academic/nuclear_physics/kin3
b.htm
– On-line program that computes relativistic three-body kinematics
Relativistic Three-Body Kinematics
Nuclear Reaction – An Observation
• If 2 of the 3 final state unknowns are specified (e.g. by specifying
the energy and direction of one of the detected particles) the
reaction is represented on the E1
’ vs E2
’ plot for the remaining 2
particles by a curve (compared to a point in 2-body scattering)
• In computing the 5-fold cross section:
N corresponds to events on the curve projected to “byte”∆E2’
E2’
2'
2'
1'
2'
2'
1'
5
∆E
∆Ω
Qnx∆
Ne
dE
dΩ
dΩ
σ
d
Ω
=
E1’
N
∆E2’
The 3He(e,e’p)2H Reaction Mechanism
• The presumed reaction mechanism is represented by the
diagram:
• This is known as the Plane Wave Impulse Approximation,
i.e. virtual photon interacts only with a single bound proton,
which is subsequently ejected from the target and detected,
while leaving the rest of 3He (i.e. 2H) unaffected (spectator)
• Valid at high energies (e.g. CEBAF)
• Note: Only one virtual photon is assumed to be exchanged
2H
p
p
γ
3He
e
e’
Definitions of Kinematic Variables
• Incident electron: momentum ki, total energy Ei , mass me
• Scattered (and detected) electron: kf, Ef, me
• Ejected (and detected) proton: pp, Ep, mp
• Target nucleus (3He): pA, EA, MA
• Left over nucleus (2H, spectator): pB, EB.
• NOTES (all quantities in lab frame):
– Target momentum pA=0 (target at rest in lab)
– Target total energy EA = mAc2 (target at rest, rest energy only)
– Ei = Ti (kinetic energy of incident electron) + mec2 (its rest energy)
• Here ignore mec2 = 0.511 MeV since Te =1-6 GeV at CEBAF >> mec2
Therefore: Ei ≈ Ti ≈ ki (recall E2 = k2c2 + (moc2)2, E in MeV/c2, k in Mev/c)
– Ef ≈ Tf ≈ kf (similarly)
– (here can’t neglect rest energy, heavier proton is
not ultra-relativistic)
2
2
p
2
2
p
p )
c
(M
c
p
E +
=
Some Additional Kinematic Variables
Scattering plane
(contains e, e’)
Reaction plane
(contains ‘γ’ and p)
Angle between scattering
and reaction planes
• Incident electron scattering angle: θe
• Angle between scattering and reaction planes: φ
– “In-plane” kinematics: φ = 0 (p “forward” of q), φ = π (p “backward” of q)
– “out-of-plane” kinematics: φ ≠ 0
• Angle between q and pp: θpq
Additional Kinematic Variables
• In a typical (e,e’p) experiment we measure:
– Ei, ki (incident beam energy, momentum)
• Recall: Ei = Ti = ki (ultra-relativistic electrons)
– Ef, kf (scattered electron energy, momentum, using Hall A HRS)
• Similarly recall: Ef = Tf = kf (ultra-relativistic electrons)
– pp (momentum of ejected proton (using Hall A HRS)
• Virtual photon momentum q may be calculated from conservation of
momentum at the e-e’-’γ vertex (ki = kf + q):
q = ki – kf
• Virtual photon energy ω may be calculated from conservation of
energy at the same vertex (Ei = Ef + ω):
ω = Ei – Ef
• q and ω are also the momentum and energy transferred to (and
absorbed by) the target nucleus by the virtual photon through this
collision.
Missing Momentum and Energy
• “Missing momentum”, pmiss, is the momentum of the undetected recoil
nucleus (2H). It may be calculated from conservation of momentum at
the ‘γ’-3He-p vertex (q = pp + pB). Therefore:
pmiss ≡ pB = q - pp
• “Missing energy”, Emiss, is the unaccounted part of the energy transfer
ω after kinetic energies Tp and TB of the known pieces of the broken up
nucleus are subtracted from it. i.e.
Emiss = ω – Tp – TB
– Note: Tp = Ep - Mpc2 = (pp
2c2 + Mp
2c4)1/2 – Mpc2
TB = EB – MBc2 = (pB
2c2 + MB
2c4) 1/2 – MBc2
• Note: Since the values of ki, kf, pp, are known (measured), the values of
q, ω, pmiss and Emiss can be calculated for each event of this reaction.
The Emiss Spectrum for 3He(e,e’p)X
• Emiss consists of the energy required to “separate” (un-bind) the
ejected proton from the target nucleus plus any “excitation” energy
the recoil nucleus might have (above its lowest, ground state). i.e.
Emiss = Esep + Eexc
where: Esep = Mpc2 + MBc2 – MAc2
• Since 3He does not have any excited states, and if the only e+3He
reaction channel possible is 3He(e,e’p)2H, there should be only one
peak in the Emiss spectrum, at the value of Esep, which can be
calculated to be 5.49 MeV (from mA = mp + m2H + Esep).
• Of course, there are additional channels available, including the 3-body
breakup channel 3He(e,e’p)pn and particle creation at higher Emiss,
leading to additional features in the Emiss spectrum.
• The 2H nucleus (deuteron) has a binding energy of (i.e. it breaks up at)
2.22 MeV. Therefore a second peak would be expected in the
spectrum at Emiss = 5.49 + 2.22 = 7.71 MeV. See Figure in next slide…
The Emiss Spectrum for 3He(e,e’p)X #1
The Emiss Spectrum for 3He(e,e’p)X #2
The Emiss Spectrum for 3He(e,e’p)X #3

More Related Content

Similar to Kinematics variables.pdfrelativistic kinematics reaction kinematics

Atomic structure part 2/3
Atomic structure part 2/3Atomic structure part 2/3
Atomic structure part 2/3Chris Sonntag
 
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...ijrap
 
Phy addn of ang momentum,slaters deter.,pep
Phy addn of ang momentum,slaters deter.,pepPhy addn of ang momentum,slaters deter.,pep
Phy addn of ang momentum,slaters deter.,pepAnuradha Verma
 
Small amplitude oscillations
Small amplitude oscillationsSmall amplitude oscillations
Small amplitude oscillationsharshsharma5537
 
Complex Dynamics and Statistics in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis
Complex Dynamics and Statistics  in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis Complex Dynamics and Statistics  in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis
Complex Dynamics and Statistics in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis Lake Como School of Advanced Studies
 
(S.h.m & waves).(reflection & refrection).(interferenc) prove s & important ...
(S.h.m & waves).(reflection & refrection).(interferenc)  prove s & important ...(S.h.m & waves).(reflection & refrection).(interferenc)  prove s & important ...
(S.h.m & waves).(reflection & refrection).(interferenc) prove s & important ...last4ever
 
Electronics devices unit 1.pptx
Electronics devices unit 1.pptxElectronics devices unit 1.pptx
Electronics devices unit 1.pptxRahulAgarwal505237
 
Quantum course
Quantum courseQuantum course
Quantum courseFLI
 
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...ijrap
 
Classical and Quasi-Classical Consideration of Charged Particles in Coulomb F...
Classical and Quasi-Classical Consideration of Charged Particles in Coulomb F...Classical and Quasi-Classical Consideration of Charged Particles in Coulomb F...
Classical and Quasi-Classical Consideration of Charged Particles in Coulomb F...ijrap
 

Similar to Kinematics variables.pdfrelativistic kinematics reaction kinematics (20)

Einestein model density of states
Einestein model density of statesEinestein model density of states
Einestein model density of states
 
Atomic structure part 2/3
Atomic structure part 2/3Atomic structure part 2/3
Atomic structure part 2/3
 
Sventae
SventaeSventae
Sventae
 
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
 
Phy addn of ang momentum,slaters deter.,pep
Phy addn of ang momentum,slaters deter.,pepPhy addn of ang momentum,slaters deter.,pep
Phy addn of ang momentum,slaters deter.,pep
 
Small amplitude oscillations
Small amplitude oscillationsSmall amplitude oscillations
Small amplitude oscillations
 
statistic mechanics
statistic mechanicsstatistic mechanics
statistic mechanics
 
Pcv ch2
Pcv ch2Pcv ch2
Pcv ch2
 
black magic
black magicblack magic
black magic
 
Problem and solution i ph o 25
Problem and solution i ph o 25Problem and solution i ph o 25
Problem and solution i ph o 25
 
Complex Dynamics and Statistics in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis
Complex Dynamics and Statistics  in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis Complex Dynamics and Statistics  in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis
Complex Dynamics and Statistics in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis
 
Elect
ElectElect
Elect
 
Problem and solution i ph o 22
Problem and solution i ph o 22Problem and solution i ph o 22
Problem and solution i ph o 22
 
Part i
Part iPart i
Part i
 
(S.h.m & waves).(reflection & refrection).(interferenc) prove s & important ...
(S.h.m & waves).(reflection & refrection).(interferenc)  prove s & important ...(S.h.m & waves).(reflection & refrection).(interferenc)  prove s & important ...
(S.h.m & waves).(reflection & refrection).(interferenc) prove s & important ...
 
Lecture 7
Lecture 7Lecture 7
Lecture 7
 
Electronics devices unit 1.pptx
Electronics devices unit 1.pptxElectronics devices unit 1.pptx
Electronics devices unit 1.pptx
 
Quantum course
Quantum courseQuantum course
Quantum course
 
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
CLASSICAL AND QUASI-CLASSICAL CONSIDERATION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN COULOMB F...
 
Classical and Quasi-Classical Consideration of Charged Particles in Coulomb F...
Classical and Quasi-Classical Consideration of Charged Particles in Coulomb F...Classical and Quasi-Classical Consideration of Charged Particles in Coulomb F...
Classical and Quasi-Classical Consideration of Charged Particles in Coulomb F...
 

Recently uploaded

Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxVS Mahajan Coaching Centre
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991RKavithamani
 
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of PowdersMicromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of PowdersChitralekhaTherkar
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppCeline George
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptxPoojaSen20
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxGaneshChakor2
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAssociation for Project Management
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
 
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of PowdersMicromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSDStaff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 

Kinematics variables.pdfrelativistic kinematics reaction kinematics

  • 1. Nuclear Reactions Some Basics II. Reaction Kinematics
  • 2. Reaction Kinematics • A beam incident on a target will result in many different reactions, including elastic and inelastic scattering, representing different collisions of beam particles with different nuclei. • To isolate a specific reaction (to measure, e.g., its cross section or some other prediction of theory), in addition to identifying the correct particles involved, we need to “look” at the right place, i.e. isolate products moving in the “correct” momentum (i.e. energy and direction). • To assist in identifying the correct energy and direction of emitted particles, we utilize the kinematics of the reaction, i.e. the predictions of: – Conservation of energy – Conservation of linear momentum for this reaction (for CEBAF energies, must use relativistic expressions) • Two-body kinematics – Used when two particles are present in the “final state” (i.e. after collision) • Three-body kinematics – Used when three particles are present in the final state
  • 3. Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering in a plane (non-relativistic) p1 K1 m2 m1 K1’ P2’ K2’ θ1’ m2 P1’ m1 θ2’ Given initial state: m1, m2, p1, p2=0 Find final state: K1’, K2’, θ2’, θ2’ • Recall: K = ½ mv2, p = mv, K = p2/2m • Only relevant physics laws are conservation of energy and momentum • Conservation of Energy: K1 = K1’ + K2’ (1) • Conservation of Momentum: p1 = p1’cosθ1’ + p2’cosθ2’ (2) 0 = p1’sinθ1’ - p2’sinθ2’ (3) • We have 3 equations, and 4 unknowns (K1’,K2’, θ1’ ,θ2’) • Therefore K’s and θ’s are not uniquely determined • If given one of the final state variables we can calculate the other three
  • 4. Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering in a plane (non-relativistic) Some Observations • If the initial conditions (m1, m2, , =0) are known in an actual elastic scattering experiment, and if a final state particle is chosen to be detected at an angle θ1, two-body kinematics determine a unique angle θ2 at which the other particle will emerge as well as both kinetic energies. • Said differently, if two detectors are to detect particles corresponding to a single elastic scattering event, they have to be placed at “conjugate” angles, i.e. angles related through two-body kinematics • Note: A single elastic scattering event (labeled A) detected at conjugate angles (θ1, θ2)A is represented by a single point on a plot of K1’ vs. K2‘ . For the same initial conditions, another event with particles detected at a different set of conjugate angles (θ1, θ2)B will produce a different combination of K1’ and K2’ and will be represented by a different single point (labeled B) on the same plot. 1 p r 2 p r K2’ K1’ A B
  • 5. Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering (Relativistic) • Conservation of (total) Energy (here use c =1): E1 + m2 = E1’ + E2’ (1) • Conservation of Momentum: p1 = p1’cosθ1’ + p2’cosθ2’(2) 0 = p1’sinθ1’ - p2’sinθ2’ (3) • Recall: E1 = K1 + m1 and E1 2 = p1 2 +m1 2 E1’ = K1’ + m1 and E1’2 = p1’2 +m1 2 E2’ = K2’ + m2 and E2’2 = p2’2 +m2 2 • Solve (1), (2), (3) for K1’, K2’, θ2’ p1 K1 m2 m1 K1’ P2’ K2’ θ1’ m2 P1’ m1 θ2’ Given: m1, m2, K1, θ1’ Find: K1’, K2’, θ2’
  • 6. Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering – Results (1) ( ) ( ) [ ] ( ) [ ] ( ) ( ) [ ] ( ) [ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 1 ' 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 ' 1 2 1 ' 2 ' 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 ' 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 ' 2 1 2 1 2 ' 2 ' 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 ' 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 ' 1 1 2 1 1 ' 1 ρ 1 θ cot ρ 1 γ ρ ρ cotθ ρ ρ 1 cotθ θ cos p m E 2 θ cos p m E 4m A cosθ p m E A E θ cos p m E 2 θ cos p m E 4m A cosθ p m E A E − + − + ± + − = − + − + − ± + = − + − + − ± + = Where A1, A2, ρ1, ρ2, γ are given by:
  • 7. Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering – Results (2) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [ ] ( ) ( ) [ ] ( ) 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 cm 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 m 2E m m m E c v 1 1 γ p m E 4m A m E p A ρ p m E 4m A m E p A ρ K m m m m 2 A K m m m m 2 A + + + = − = − + − + = − + − + = + + = + + = Interactive program that calculate 2-body kinematics: http://www.calstatela.edu/academic/nuclear_physics/2bdkin.html
  • 8. Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering - Observations • Note: Not any θ1, θ2 pairs are possible in two-body kinematics – Square root in E1, E2 must be > 0 • Note: If m1 = m2 then θ1’ + θ2’ < π/2 (unlike classical mechanics) • Interactive program that calculate 2-body kinematics: – http://www.calstatela.edu/academic/nuclear_physics/2bdkin.html ( ) [ ] ( ) [ ] 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 ' 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 ' 1 2 p 4m K 2m m m 4m A θ sin p 4m K 2m m m 4m A θ sin + + − ≤ + + − ≤
  • 9. Three-Body Kinematics Nuclear Reaction (Relativistic) mT K1’ P2’ K2’ θ1’ P1’ m1 θ2’ m2 po Ko mo θ3’ mR PR KR • Conservation of energy and momentum hold again. Eo + mT = E1’ + E2’ + ER’ (1) po = p1’cosθ1’ + p2’cosθ2’ + pRcosθ3’ (2) 0 = p1’sinθ1’ - p2’sinθ2’ + pRsinθ3’ (3) – In addition, but ignore for now, there may be “out-of-plane” (φ) momentum components • Here we have 3 equations and 6 unknowns (E1’, E2’, ER’, θ1’, θ2’, θ3’) • Need to know 3 variables in the final state to compute everything else
  • 10. Computing Relativistic Three-Body Kinematics • Will not solve analytically expressions for unknowns here. • Go to: http://www.calstatela.edu/academic/nuclear_physics/kin3 b.htm – On-line program that computes relativistic three-body kinematics
  • 11. Relativistic Three-Body Kinematics Nuclear Reaction – An Observation • If 2 of the 3 final state unknowns are specified (e.g. by specifying the energy and direction of one of the detected particles) the reaction is represented on the E1 ’ vs E2 ’ plot for the remaining 2 particles by a curve (compared to a point in 2-body scattering) • In computing the 5-fold cross section: N corresponds to events on the curve projected to “byte”∆E2’ E2’ 2' 2' 1' 2' 2' 1' 5 ∆E ∆Ω Qnx∆ Ne dE dΩ dΩ σ d Ω = E1’ N ∆E2’
  • 12. The 3He(e,e’p)2H Reaction Mechanism • The presumed reaction mechanism is represented by the diagram: • This is known as the Plane Wave Impulse Approximation, i.e. virtual photon interacts only with a single bound proton, which is subsequently ejected from the target and detected, while leaving the rest of 3He (i.e. 2H) unaffected (spectator) • Valid at high energies (e.g. CEBAF) • Note: Only one virtual photon is assumed to be exchanged 2H p p γ 3He e e’
  • 13. Definitions of Kinematic Variables • Incident electron: momentum ki, total energy Ei , mass me • Scattered (and detected) electron: kf, Ef, me • Ejected (and detected) proton: pp, Ep, mp • Target nucleus (3He): pA, EA, MA • Left over nucleus (2H, spectator): pB, EB. • NOTES (all quantities in lab frame): – Target momentum pA=0 (target at rest in lab) – Target total energy EA = mAc2 (target at rest, rest energy only) – Ei = Ti (kinetic energy of incident electron) + mec2 (its rest energy) • Here ignore mec2 = 0.511 MeV since Te =1-6 GeV at CEBAF >> mec2 Therefore: Ei ≈ Ti ≈ ki (recall E2 = k2c2 + (moc2)2, E in MeV/c2, k in Mev/c) – Ef ≈ Tf ≈ kf (similarly) – (here can’t neglect rest energy, heavier proton is not ultra-relativistic) 2 2 p 2 2 p p ) c (M c p E + =
  • 14. Some Additional Kinematic Variables Scattering plane (contains e, e’) Reaction plane (contains ‘γ’ and p) Angle between scattering and reaction planes • Incident electron scattering angle: θe • Angle between scattering and reaction planes: φ – “In-plane” kinematics: φ = 0 (p “forward” of q), φ = π (p “backward” of q) – “out-of-plane” kinematics: φ ≠ 0 • Angle between q and pp: θpq
  • 15. Additional Kinematic Variables • In a typical (e,e’p) experiment we measure: – Ei, ki (incident beam energy, momentum) • Recall: Ei = Ti = ki (ultra-relativistic electrons) – Ef, kf (scattered electron energy, momentum, using Hall A HRS) • Similarly recall: Ef = Tf = kf (ultra-relativistic electrons) – pp (momentum of ejected proton (using Hall A HRS) • Virtual photon momentum q may be calculated from conservation of momentum at the e-e’-’γ vertex (ki = kf + q): q = ki – kf • Virtual photon energy ω may be calculated from conservation of energy at the same vertex (Ei = Ef + ω): ω = Ei – Ef • q and ω are also the momentum and energy transferred to (and absorbed by) the target nucleus by the virtual photon through this collision.
  • 16. Missing Momentum and Energy • “Missing momentum”, pmiss, is the momentum of the undetected recoil nucleus (2H). It may be calculated from conservation of momentum at the ‘γ’-3He-p vertex (q = pp + pB). Therefore: pmiss ≡ pB = q - pp • “Missing energy”, Emiss, is the unaccounted part of the energy transfer ω after kinetic energies Tp and TB of the known pieces of the broken up nucleus are subtracted from it. i.e. Emiss = ω – Tp – TB – Note: Tp = Ep - Mpc2 = (pp 2c2 + Mp 2c4)1/2 – Mpc2 TB = EB – MBc2 = (pB 2c2 + MB 2c4) 1/2 – MBc2 • Note: Since the values of ki, kf, pp, are known (measured), the values of q, ω, pmiss and Emiss can be calculated for each event of this reaction.
  • 17. The Emiss Spectrum for 3He(e,e’p)X • Emiss consists of the energy required to “separate” (un-bind) the ejected proton from the target nucleus plus any “excitation” energy the recoil nucleus might have (above its lowest, ground state). i.e. Emiss = Esep + Eexc where: Esep = Mpc2 + MBc2 – MAc2 • Since 3He does not have any excited states, and if the only e+3He reaction channel possible is 3He(e,e’p)2H, there should be only one peak in the Emiss spectrum, at the value of Esep, which can be calculated to be 5.49 MeV (from mA = mp + m2H + Esep). • Of course, there are additional channels available, including the 3-body breakup channel 3He(e,e’p)pn and particle creation at higher Emiss, leading to additional features in the Emiss spectrum. • The 2H nucleus (deuteron) has a binding energy of (i.e. it breaks up at) 2.22 MeV. Therefore a second peak would be expected in the spectrum at Emiss = 5.49 + 2.22 = 7.71 MeV. See Figure in next slide…
  • 18. The Emiss Spectrum for 3He(e,e’p)X #1
  • 19. The Emiss Spectrum for 3He(e,e’p)X #2
  • 20. The Emiss Spectrum for 3He(e,e’p)X #3