Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 would not have come into picture, had Justice Ranjan Gogoi would have taken addition ground filed through Interlocutory application no.03 into his consideration. This writ was filed against the Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha's aide Mr. Praveen Kumar, Indian Defense Account Service & CMD of IDPL, New Delhi. Hence my mother's life could have been saved.
Are the rights and obligations arising from a license transferable under Arti...Michal
The judgement of the Supreme Court here described refers to the acquisition
of rights arising from a license by an entity which has acquitted a state enterprise
as a result of direct privatization, pursuant to Article 40 of the Act of 20 August
1996 on Privatization and Commercialization1 (hereafter PCA). In the event the
aforementioned acquisition occurs, the purchaser shall become the subject of the
rights and obligations under the license; inter alia the purchaser is eligible to request
performing the amendment of the decision which granted the license under Article
155 of the Code of Administrative Procedure.
Which authority is competent to decide when a power company is abusing monopo...Michal
By the decision of July 10, 2006 (No. RKT-42/2006), the President of the Polish
Office for Competition and Consumer Protection (hereafter, UOKiK) found that the
practice of the Częstochowa Power Company, a branch of ENION SA based in Kraków
(hereinafter ENION SA), was restricting competition by abusing its dominant market
position in the transmission and distribution of electricity by making the conclusion
of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations
which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with
the subject of such contracts. The UOKiK President imposed a fine on ENION SA
of 100 000 zł.
Supreme Court Judgement - L&T / K Raheja (VAT on Builders)sandesh mundra
This presentation takes one through the details of recent Supreme Court Judgement in the case of Larsen & Toubro, which was a review of K Raheja Judgement. The judgement has a severe impact on the tax aspects of builders and real estate developers. It redefines the definition of works contract and levy of VAT on sale of flats and commercial premises
Are the rights and obligations arising from a license transferable under Arti...Michal
The judgement of the Supreme Court here described refers to the acquisition
of rights arising from a license by an entity which has acquitted a state enterprise
as a result of direct privatization, pursuant to Article 40 of the Act of 20 August
1996 on Privatization and Commercialization1 (hereafter PCA). In the event the
aforementioned acquisition occurs, the purchaser shall become the subject of the
rights and obligations under the license; inter alia the purchaser is eligible to request
performing the amendment of the decision which granted the license under Article
155 of the Code of Administrative Procedure.
Which authority is competent to decide when a power company is abusing monopo...Michal
By the decision of July 10, 2006 (No. RKT-42/2006), the President of the Polish
Office for Competition and Consumer Protection (hereafter, UOKiK) found that the
practice of the Częstochowa Power Company, a branch of ENION SA based in Kraków
(hereinafter ENION SA), was restricting competition by abusing its dominant market
position in the transmission and distribution of electricity by making the conclusion
of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations
which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with
the subject of such contracts. The UOKiK President imposed a fine on ENION SA
of 100 000 zł.
Supreme Court Judgement - L&T / K Raheja (VAT on Builders)sandesh mundra
This presentation takes one through the details of recent Supreme Court Judgement in the case of Larsen & Toubro, which was a review of K Raheja Judgement. The judgement has a severe impact on the tax aspects of builders and real estate developers. It redefines the definition of works contract and levy of VAT on sale of flats and commercial premises
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supr...Om Prakash Poddar
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal to register Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of india filed on 09.12.2016 ...Om Prakash Poddar
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of India has been filed on 09.12.2016 vide diary no. 41026 WITHOUT certificate by Sr. Advocate violating the the guidelines laid down in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs Ashok Hurra 2002 (4) SCC 388. It is further submitted under para 15 of the Curative Petition Criminal that the Certificate by Sr. Advocate has not been filed by the petitioner because of the valid and unavoidable reasons which has been caused by this Hon’ble Court. The petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. The mentioning officer of this Hon’ble Court has stopped the petitioner no.02 who was eligible to mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s court and Registry has circulated unregistered Interlocutory Application for constitution bench dated 18.10.2016 vide diary no. 77878 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Further Registry has suppressed the record of application dated 03.10.2016 for urgent mentioning of the matter and urgent relief sought before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India filed by the petitioner on behalf of petitioner no.02 as per the guidelines and grounds laid down in the Handbook of this Hon’ble Court. Registry did not surrender the file before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court which has been disclosed through certified copy of the office report dated 20.10.2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Hence, Mentioning Officer and Registry both have spoiled the valid ground of Constitution bench and mentioning the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court to make it liable to be dismissed with liberty by the two judge bench violating the Order XXXV of Supreme Court Rule 1966. In other words, petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016; which has resulted in gross miscarriage of justice. In view of the above mentioned circumstances, Petitioner no. 01 and 02 has been left with no option but to survive or may not survive at the mercy of the GOD.
True Copy of Writ Petition Civil 90 of 2016 filed against illegal termination of service by Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited,a public enterprises under Government of India before Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of Constitution of India for enforcement of Article 21.
Writ Petition Criminal D.NO. 2188 of 2017 entitled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS" filed on 18.01.2017 Vide Diary No. 2188 against Supreme Court of India for Evading Rule of Law; Violating set practice, procedure as laid down in the Handbook of this Hon'ble Court; protecting/shielding Bad Elements of State Apparatus and offending, harassing, victimizing the Petitioner-in Person and his Senior Citizen old age Oxygen dependent mother.
This happens to be last resort under legal remedy before the COURT OF LAW for us.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016Om Prakash Poddar
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Lodgement Order dated 28.01.2017 of Registrar Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
Registrar Supreme Court of India refused to register Writ Petition Criminal No........of 2017 titled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS" vide Diary No. 2188 of 2017 under Order XV Rule 5 of Supreme Court Rules, 2013 vide Lodgement Order dated 28.01.2017 on the ground of no reasonable cause received for registration under order XV, Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 which has suspended the fundamental rights of the petitioners under Article 21 and closed the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioners forever.
Order against curative criminal d 41026 of 2016 dated 27.03.2017Om Prakash Poddar
NEXUS OF SITTING JUDGE JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA & RTD. JUSTICE S.B.SINHA IN PLANNED MURDER EVADING THE RULE OF LAW AND VIOLATING PETITIONER'S RIGHT AS WELL AS HUMAN RIGHTS
Kee Pharma High Court Order - https://keepharmaltd.wordpress.com/ - This will be the last extension. If the amount together with interest thereon is not deposited within six weeks from today, the special leave petition will stand rejected without further recourse to this Court.
Kee Pharma Ltd vs Cbz Chemicals Ltd Supreme Court Orders on 4 May, 2018keepharma
Kee Pharma Ltd vs Cbz Chemicals Ltd Supreme Court Orders on 4 May, 2018. For detail visit: https://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/supremecourt/2017/42406/42406_2017_Order_04-May-2018.pdf
Kee Pharma Supreme Court Order - http://keepharma.blogspot.com/ - we make it clear that, in case this amount is not deposited along with interest before the Registry of this Court within the stipulated time, the Special Leave Petition will stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supr...Om Prakash Poddar
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal to register Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of india filed on 09.12.2016 ...Om Prakash Poddar
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of India has been filed on 09.12.2016 vide diary no. 41026 WITHOUT certificate by Sr. Advocate violating the the guidelines laid down in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs Ashok Hurra 2002 (4) SCC 388. It is further submitted under para 15 of the Curative Petition Criminal that the Certificate by Sr. Advocate has not been filed by the petitioner because of the valid and unavoidable reasons which has been caused by this Hon’ble Court. The petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. The mentioning officer of this Hon’ble Court has stopped the petitioner no.02 who was eligible to mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s court and Registry has circulated unregistered Interlocutory Application for constitution bench dated 18.10.2016 vide diary no. 77878 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Further Registry has suppressed the record of application dated 03.10.2016 for urgent mentioning of the matter and urgent relief sought before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India filed by the petitioner on behalf of petitioner no.02 as per the guidelines and grounds laid down in the Handbook of this Hon’ble Court. Registry did not surrender the file before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court which has been disclosed through certified copy of the office report dated 20.10.2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Hence, Mentioning Officer and Registry both have spoiled the valid ground of Constitution bench and mentioning the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court to make it liable to be dismissed with liberty by the two judge bench violating the Order XXXV of Supreme Court Rule 1966. In other words, petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016; which has resulted in gross miscarriage of justice. In view of the above mentioned circumstances, Petitioner no. 01 and 02 has been left with no option but to survive or may not survive at the mercy of the GOD.
True Copy of Writ Petition Civil 90 of 2016 filed against illegal termination of service by Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited,a public enterprises under Government of India before Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of Constitution of India for enforcement of Article 21.
Writ Petition Criminal D.NO. 2188 of 2017 entitled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS" filed on 18.01.2017 Vide Diary No. 2188 against Supreme Court of India for Evading Rule of Law; Violating set practice, procedure as laid down in the Handbook of this Hon'ble Court; protecting/shielding Bad Elements of State Apparatus and offending, harassing, victimizing the Petitioner-in Person and his Senior Citizen old age Oxygen dependent mother.
This happens to be last resort under legal remedy before the COURT OF LAW for us.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016Om Prakash Poddar
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Lodgement Order dated 28.01.2017 of Registrar Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
Registrar Supreme Court of India refused to register Writ Petition Criminal No........of 2017 titled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS" vide Diary No. 2188 of 2017 under Order XV Rule 5 of Supreme Court Rules, 2013 vide Lodgement Order dated 28.01.2017 on the ground of no reasonable cause received for registration under order XV, Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 which has suspended the fundamental rights of the petitioners under Article 21 and closed the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioners forever.
Order against curative criminal d 41026 of 2016 dated 27.03.2017Om Prakash Poddar
NEXUS OF SITTING JUDGE JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA & RTD. JUSTICE S.B.SINHA IN PLANNED MURDER EVADING THE RULE OF LAW AND VIOLATING PETITIONER'S RIGHT AS WELL AS HUMAN RIGHTS
Kee Pharma High Court Order - https://keepharmaltd.wordpress.com/ - This will be the last extension. If the amount together with interest thereon is not deposited within six weeks from today, the special leave petition will stand rejected without further recourse to this Court.
Kee Pharma Ltd vs Cbz Chemicals Ltd Supreme Court Orders on 4 May, 2018keepharma
Kee Pharma Ltd vs Cbz Chemicals Ltd Supreme Court Orders on 4 May, 2018. For detail visit: https://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/supremecourt/2017/42406/42406_2017_Order_04-May-2018.pdf
Kee Pharma Supreme Court Order - http://keepharma.blogspot.com/ - we make it clear that, in case this amount is not deposited along with interest before the Registry of this Court within the stipulated time, the Special Leave Petition will stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Petition for abuse of police power in W.P. CRL. 137 of 2021 before Supreme C...OmPrakashPoddar1
Hello everyone,
Tomorrow, 02.05.2022, I am going to appear before Supreme Court of India in the hearing of W.P. (CRL) 137/201 against pushing my whole families, siblings and their minor children into the International market of illicit sex trade/hidden prostitution by the nexus of state, mafia and international sex racketeers since 18 years.
If am being killed/murdered, No issue.
I appeal from all Social Workers to pursue this case in the larger public interest.
Find enclosed the soft copy of complete petition and impleadments/intervention applications in W.P. (Crl.) 137/2021 at my linked In profile.
Thanks & all the best for healthy India
Reply to Election Commission Delhi in NGS5322435639 dated 25.11.2022.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ERO Ms. Sunita Raj mobile no. 9650058340 59-Vishwas Nagar Constituency Sahadra district at East Delhi has admitted this fact that she has sent her man for making a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant on 24.11.2022 at Shelter Home DUSIB Code No.214 near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi. Hence, your BLO will disclose the name and address of person for whom he wanted to make fake Voter ID with ulterior motives.
112 call has been made against your fraud BLO dated 24.11.2022 with unique reference no. 6161038, PCR Petrol Vehicle ROMO9A mobile no. 7428002509 at 19.32.34pm. Anand Vihar policeman mobile number is 8595888677. Police had taken him to the police station. Hence police has recorded his name and address and motives behind it.
Inquiry officer Balveer Singh mobile no. 9654963400 of Patpatganj Industrial Area Police Station near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi will provide you the name and address of person who had come to make a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant.
Your fraud BLO did not disclose his identity before complainant.
Complaint dated 27.11.2022 to Commissioner of Polic Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
TAKE the cognizance of obvious links between Ms. Sunita Raj, BLO Anand Vihar and Mr. Manish Raj with this International Sex Racket and direct to concern SHO to register an F.I.R against the accused under relevant sections of IPC.
112 call dated 24.11.2022 at 19.32.34pm with unique reference no. 6161038 and subsequent Complaint dated 25.11.2022 to the Commissioner of Police Delhi dated 25.11.2022 discloses links with Mr. Manish Raj son of Chief Minister of Jharkhand in this International Sex Racket
Suppression of crucial records in Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in W.P. (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 listed for hearing on 28.11.2022 before Chamber Judge HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, Court No.15 CL.NO.1748 may lead to dismissal of petition.
Registry has only recorded the records to defend its heinous work in the Office Report dated 26.11.2022 hiding all the factual crucial records filed by the petitioner even after his reminder though e-filed letter dated 22.11.2022 addressed to Branch Officer and Assistant Registrar Section X
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Registry has recorded records in his favor only and has ignored the crucial records of petitioner deliberately to dismiss the petition by default.
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 for the hearing of Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18646/2022 on 28.11.2022 has been made hiding the crucial records filed by the petitioner.
Office Report dated 28.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Office Report has been made hiding crucial records of petitioner. Registry has recorded his own record only and has deliberately ignored the record of petitioner to dismiss the petition by default.
Complaint dated 26.11.22 against Election Officer Katihar Bihar.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
a fake voter identity card has been created by BLO Part-220, Ward No.03, 64-Kadwa Constituency Katihar Bihar vide EPIC No. TYGO395244 against the Complainant. Complainant has figured out malpractices of BLO and submitted requisite form before BLO Gopal Malik mobile no. 9507949474 dated 17.12.2021 for deletion of his name from the voter list to suppress the practice of multiple voter identity cards across the Country.
Complaint dated 25.11.22 against Election Officer Sahadra Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Sex abuser Manish from Election Commission Delhi took my Aadhar Card by fraud to make Voter ID for my kidnapped minor daughter marking me as a legal guardian under Vishwas Nagar Constituency at Sahadra district of East Delhi.
Praying from you to direct the registry to supply the fixed date of hearing to the petitioner in person in writing in Non Bailable and Gang Rape matter W.P. Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 so that he can plan his travel for home
Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...Om Prakash Poddar
Take all 84 e-filed legal documents with effect from 07.06.2022 to 22.11.2022 along with physical filed legal document with effect from 14.06.2022 to till date on Record of office report for the date of hearing on 25.11.2022
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed deliberately by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with an ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
E-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Supreme Court ...Om Prakash Poddar
All Annexes, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Petitioner has e-filed 10 legal documents on 7.6.2022 and 84 Additional legal documents till 22.11.2022 in Provisional Application no. 12939-2022 and Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 before Supreme Court of India which has not been taken into record of office report dated 24.09.2022 and has not been entered into Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 at the website in the public domain. Hence, crucial records have been suppressed deliberately with ulterior motive.
Complaint dated 21.11.2022 against Bihar and Delhi police to NHRC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
#Internationalsexracket
National Human Rights Commission New Delhi, take action against kidnapping, abduction and Gang Rape of my families and minor daughters.
E-filed status dated 15.11.22 before Supreme Court of India.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
E-filed Important legal documents like Interlocutory Applications for additional grounds and cancellation of Non Bailable Warrant has not been entered into Physical filing case record Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 to present the wrong fact before the Chamber Judge on 25.11.2022
Complaint aginst Delhi Police to NHRC New Delhi dated 20.11.22.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police case.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdfOm Prakash Poddar
International Sex Racket and Anti-Prostitution Petition before Supreme Court of India.
These five are key people and will reveal all records in this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court New Delhi.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
Abdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal Court
Order dated 18.04.2016 in Writ Civil 90 of 2016 by SC
1. ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.7 SECTION X
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).90/2016
OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD AND ORS Respondent(s)
(With appln.(s) for ad-interim ex-parte stay, permission to appear
and argue in person, permission to file additional documents and
office report)
(I.A. No.4- Appln. for seeking permission to submit written
mentioning of arguments.)
Date : 18/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Om Prakash, In-person
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Heard the petitioner-in-person and perused
the relevant material.
We find no ground to entertain this petition
under Article 32 of the Constitution. Accordingly,
the writ petition is dismissed.
As a sequel to the above, all pending
interlocutory applications are disposed of.
(Neetu Khajuria)
Sr.P.A.
(Asha Soni)
Court Master
Digitally signed by USHA
RANI BHARDWAJ
Date: 2016.04.18
17:31:44 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified