Jai bhagwan daily order
•
0 likes•359 views
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Jai Bhagwan regarding the State of Haryana. The court directed the standing counsel for Haryana to file a counter affidavit or status report by November 8th. Senior police officers must appear with relevant records on that date. Liberty was also granted to the petitioners' counsel to file a status report. The matter was listed for further hearing on November 8th.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
C-28726
The grievance concerns a Postal Service policy requiring letter carriers in Frankfort, KY to provide verification of medical appointments for all scheduled sick leave requests of less than 3 days. The arbitrator found that the policy violated the Employee and Labor Relations Manual (ELM) which only allows supervisors to request verification for absences of 3 days or less on a case-by-case basis if the employee is on restricted sick leave or if verification is deemed necessary to protect the employer's interests. The blanket policy constituted an unreasonable and arbitrary application of the ELM. As such, the grievance was sustained.
Sc ration card order
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition regarding providing ration to those without ration cards and universalizing the Public Distribution System. The Court noted that this was a policy issue best left to the Government of India and concerned states to consider relief. It directed the petitioners to serve the writ petition on the Solicitor General and disposed of the petition with the observation that the issue was a policy matter for the government.
Sc order april 6 (2)
The Supreme Court of India heard several matters related to implementation of its previous orders on police reforms. It directed the Union of India to make necessary budgetary allocations for six agencies within one month to implement the orders. These agencies must then implement the orders in full within six months of receiving funds. The Court also reviewed progress in some states but noted no progress in Andaman & Nicobar Islands, directing its Principal Secretary to allocate funds within a month or implement the orders in full within six months of funding. It thanked the Amicus Curiae for assistance and scheduled review on a future date.
Sc order apr 9 upadhyay petition
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay against the Union of India and others. Upon hearing from counsel on both sides, the Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGEMENT AGAINST WRIT CIVIL 90 OF 2016
The Supreme Court of India dismissed a writ petition filed by Om Prakash against Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd and others. After hearing from the petitioner, the court found no valid grounds to entertain the petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution. As a result of dismissing the writ petition, all pending interlocutory applications in the case were also disposed of.
Order dated 18.04.2016 in Writ Civil 90 of 2016 by SC
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 would not have come into picture, had Justice Ranjan Gogoi would have taken addition ground filed through Interlocutory application no.03 into his consideration. This writ was filed against the Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha's aide Mr. Praveen Kumar, Indian Defense Account Service & CMD of IDPL, New Delhi. Hence my mother's life could have been saved.
Araria case bail order sc aug 4
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Kalyani Badola and another against the State of Bihar regarding their exemption from filing documents and seeking appropriate orders. The petitioners were represented by multiple advocates including Ms. Vrinda Grover and Ms. Shahrukh Alam. The Court issued a notice to the respondents. As an interim order, the Court directed the release of the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each until further orders.
Witness protection order sc in legislator cases
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition. It summarizes the discussion during the hearing. The amicus curiae presented a report analyzing information provided by various High Courts on pending criminal cases against elected representatives. Key issues highlighted include the need for improved video conferencing infrastructure to record witness testimony, exempting witnesses from applying for protection under the witness protection scheme, appointing nodal prosecution officers to ensure cases progress swiftly, having judicial officers handle such cases for at least 2 years for continuity, and addressing specific issues faced by High Courts of Kerala and Calcutta where police are reluctant to take action against legislators. The Court will consider the suggestions to rationalize the process for expeditious disposal
Recommended
C-28726
The grievance concerns a Postal Service policy requiring letter carriers in Frankfort, KY to provide verification of medical appointments for all scheduled sick leave requests of less than 3 days. The arbitrator found that the policy violated the Employee and Labor Relations Manual (ELM) which only allows supervisors to request verification for absences of 3 days or less on a case-by-case basis if the employee is on restricted sick leave or if verification is deemed necessary to protect the employer's interests. The blanket policy constituted an unreasonable and arbitrary application of the ELM. As such, the grievance was sustained.
Sc ration card order
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition regarding providing ration to those without ration cards and universalizing the Public Distribution System. The Court noted that this was a policy issue best left to the Government of India and concerned states to consider relief. It directed the petitioners to serve the writ petition on the Solicitor General and disposed of the petition with the observation that the issue was a policy matter for the government.
Sc order april 6 (2)
The Supreme Court of India heard several matters related to implementation of its previous orders on police reforms. It directed the Union of India to make necessary budgetary allocations for six agencies within one month to implement the orders. These agencies must then implement the orders in full within six months of receiving funds. The Court also reviewed progress in some states but noted no progress in Andaman & Nicobar Islands, directing its Principal Secretary to allocate funds within a month or implement the orders in full within six months of funding. It thanked the Amicus Curiae for assistance and scheduled review on a future date.
Sc order apr 9 upadhyay petition
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay against the Union of India and others. Upon hearing from counsel on both sides, the Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGEMENT AGAINST WRIT CIVIL 90 OF 2016
The Supreme Court of India dismissed a writ petition filed by Om Prakash against Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd and others. After hearing from the petitioner, the court found no valid grounds to entertain the petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution. As a result of dismissing the writ petition, all pending interlocutory applications in the case were also disposed of.
Order dated 18.04.2016 in Writ Civil 90 of 2016 by SC
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 would not have come into picture, had Justice Ranjan Gogoi would have taken addition ground filed through Interlocutory application no.03 into his consideration. This writ was filed against the Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha's aide Mr. Praveen Kumar, Indian Defense Account Service & CMD of IDPL, New Delhi. Hence my mother's life could have been saved.
Araria case bail order sc aug 4
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Kalyani Badola and another against the State of Bihar regarding their exemption from filing documents and seeking appropriate orders. The petitioners were represented by multiple advocates including Ms. Vrinda Grover and Ms. Shahrukh Alam. The Court issued a notice to the respondents. As an interim order, the Court directed the release of the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each until further orders.
Witness protection order sc in legislator cases
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition. It summarizes the discussion during the hearing. The amicus curiae presented a report analyzing information provided by various High Courts on pending criminal cases against elected representatives. Key issues highlighted include the need for improved video conferencing infrastructure to record witness testimony, exempting witnesses from applying for protection under the witness protection scheme, appointing nodal prosecution officers to ensure cases progress swiftly, having judicial officers handle such cases for at least 2 years for continuity, and addressing specific issues faced by High Courts of Kerala and Calcutta where police are reluctant to take action against legislators. The Court will consider the suggestions to rationalize the process for expeditious disposal
Sc order aadhar oct 14
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay against the Union of India and others. The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate remedy before the appropriate High Court. The court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the said liberty.
Supreme Court of India Order dated 21_10_2016 against Writ Petition Criminal ...
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Om Prakash and another against the State of Bihar regarding a criminal case. After hearing from both parties, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition but allowed the petitioners to approach the High Court on the matter.
30052 2019 4_5_17733_order_25-oct-2019
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Mukesh Gupta against the State of Chhattisgarh regarding phone tapping and appropriate orders. Senior advocates from both sides were present. The Court ordered that phone tapping of the petitioner be stopped immediately as assured by the senior counsel for the respondent. The Court also ordered that the interim order will continue and the petitioner should not be harassed or arrested until the next hearing.
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
A journalist named Aman Chopra filed a petition claiming three FIRs were registered against him for the same act of airing a discussion show and posting it on Twitter, which allegedly led to communal disharmony. The petitioner argued that the investigation of the subsequent two FIRs should not proceed as they were filed maliciously to harass him. The court issued notices to the respondents and granted the petitioner protection from arrest in the two subsequent FIRs until further orders, as the investigation of multiple FIRs for the same cause of action is not permissible according to Supreme Court judgments.
State v anwar hussain
1) Anwar Hussain applied for bail in an ongoing criminal case where he has been charged with rioting and murder that took place on February 24, 2020 near Kardampuri Pulia in Delhi during sectarian riots.
2) The prosecution opposed bail, arguing that Anwar was seen actively participating in the riots based on eyewitness accounts and CCTV footage. However, the footage was from February 23 and not the date of the incident.
3) Considering that the video evidence did not pertain to the date of the incident, the time Anwar has already spent in custody, and the circumstances of the case, the court granted bail to Anwar subject to certain conditions.
20200921 s consexworkers
1. The Supreme Court of India heard an application (IA) regarding providing relief such as monthly dry rations and cash transfers to sex workers without requiring proof of identity.
2. The Court directed the applicant's counsel to serve the respondent states a copy of the application and the registry to email it to all states immediately.
3. The Court directed the Additional Solicitor General and state government counsels to obtain instructions on modalities for distributing relief to sex workers without identity proof and listed the matter for further hearing on September 29th.
Hapur Lynching
The document discusses a Supreme Court of India case involving a writ petition. At a hearing, the petitioner's counsel drew attention to statements made in an additional affidavit filed by the Superintendent of Police. The Court decided not to direct the investigating agency to file a supplementary charge-sheet, but instead permitted the petitioners to draw the trial judge's attention to statements made under Section 164 of the CrPC and deferred further hearing until after the summer vacation.
20190828 s cordersitaramyechurikashmir
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Sitaram Yechury, General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), seeking the production of Mohammad Yousuf Tarigami, a party member and former member of the Jammu & Kashmir Legislative Assembly. Yechury complained that he had been unable to meet or inquire about Tarigami's welfare due to being denied entry to Jammu & Kashmir. The Court permitted Yechury to travel to Jammu & Kashmir to meet Tarigami and inquire about his health and welfare, but for no other purpose. The Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police in Jammu & Kashmir to facilitate Yechury's travel and help
Supreme Court Order on GN Saibaba Bail Case (04.04.2016)
The Supreme Court of India was hearing a petition for special leave to appeal regarding the conviction of Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba. In the previous hearing, the Court had directed the trial court to hold day-to-day proceedings to record statements of all material witnesses by a certain date. In this hearing, the state of Maharashtra informed the Court that all material witnesses have been examined and cross-examined. However, 8 formal witnesses remained. The Court observed that since all material witnesses were examined, continuing detention of the petitioner was unfair given his medical condition. Therefore, the Court directed the petitioner's release on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court.
SC imposes 25k cost order.pdf
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition. It notes that the petition was called in the mentioning board before Justices Kaul and Oka. The court ordered the petition to be listed on December 5th and for the respondent to file their counter affidavit within two weeks, after which it will only be accepted if Rs. 25,000 costs are deposited with the court. A copy of the order is to be issued to the respondent's counsel.
SC order on Assam illegal migrants in detention centres
Supreme Court of India on Feb 19, 2019 came down heavily on Assam government for poor conditions in detention centres for illegal migrants and keeping them far too long against their sentence
20191018 sc order on hajela transfer
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding several writ petitions and interim applications. It summarizes that the Court, after hearing from lawyers representing various parties, ordered the inter-cadre transfer of Mr. Prateek Hajela, the State Coordinator for the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, to the state of Madhya Pradesh on deputation for the maximum period allowed under relevant rules. The notification for this transfer must be issued within 7 days. All other issues in the case will be heard again by the Court on November 26, 2019.
Sc sudarshan news order 23-sep-2020
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Firoz Iqbal Khan against the Union of India and others. It summarizes the hearing held on September 23, 2020. During the hearing, the Solicitor General requested deferring the hearing to allow the central government time to issue a notice to Sudarshan News and take action. The court agreed to defer the hearing to October 5, 2020 and ordered the notice's proceedings and any actions to be subject to the outcome of this case. The interim order from September 15, 2020 will remain in effect until further orders.
3 274 20092020_01_06
The Supreme Court of India heard several matters related to citizenship in Assam. It granted the Attorney General of India 4 weeks to file a reply on one matter and granted the State of Assam 4 weeks to file replies on other matters related to interlocutory applications. The Attorney General stated that children of parents given citizenship will not be separated from parents and sent to detention centers pending the application's decision.
Sc sedition plea dismissed order 09-feb-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Aditya Ranjan and others against the Union of India and others. After hearing arguments from both sides, the court dismissed the writ petition. All pending interlocutory applications related to the writ petition were also disposed of.
Sc order 29.08.2018 activist arrest
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Romila Thapar and others against the Union of India and others. The Court issued a notice to the respondents and ordered them to file a counter affidavit by September 5, 2018. As an interim measure, the Court ordered that if Varavara Rao, Arun Ferreira and Vernon Gonsalves are arrested, they must be kept under house arrest at their own homes, extending the existing house arrest orders for Gautam Navalakha and Sudha Bharadwaj passed by the High Court. The matter was listed for further hearing on September 6, 2018.
Supreme Court Order
Prominent Indians from across the political spectrum, historian Romila Thapar, academic Devaki Jain, left economist, professor Prabhat Patnaik, professor of s0ciology Satish Deshpande and human rights lawyer, Maja Daruwala have approached the SC urging that the highest court intervenes and seeks an explanation from the Maharashtra government on the recent spate of arrests of lawyers, academics and activists.
Sc suo moto order order 19-jan-2021
The Supreme Court of India took suo moto cognizance of inadequacies and deficiencies in criminal trials in India. It constituted a committee of amici curiae to examine the issues and submit a report with proposed amendments to rules. The committee submitted its report. The Supreme Court noted that only 5 of 24 High Courts submitted responses and directed the remaining High Courts to submit substantive responses within 2 weeks or have their Registrar Generals appear before the Court. It also constituted a new committee to examine suggestions for digitizing records and facilitating timely filing of appeals by convicts to reduce delays, and directed High Courts to submit responses to this committee within 2 weeks. The matter was listed for further hearing after 4 weeks.
Gauhati hc 482 inherent juris for foreigner order
1) The petitioner, Md. Amir Khan, filed a petition seeking to quash the order that convicted him under the Foreigners Act for illegally residing in India.
2) The trial court had framed charges and the petitioner had pled guilty, receiving a two year prison sentence and fine.
3) The petitioner now claims he is not a foreigner but a citizen of Tripura, India based on birth and school documents. However, he did not provide these documents during the investigation or trial.
4) The high court dismissed the petition, finding no illegality in the trial court's order since the petitioner pled guilty without presenting any evidence and the documents are produced only after appealing the conviction.
Order_25-Aug-2023.pdffrZFrffrgfrtfrfrrfrrdd
2023 (और उससे पहले 2022) में सुप्रीम कोर्ट द्वारा नफरत फैलाने वाले भाषण पर अंकुश लगाने के लिए जारी किए गए कई दिशानिर्देशों के बावजूद हेट स्पीच की घटनाएं सामने आती रहती हैं। नागरिक नफरत मुक्त 2024 कैसे सुनिश्चित कर सकते हैं?
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
More Related Content
Similar to Jai bhagwan daily order
Sc order aadhar oct 14
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay against the Union of India and others. The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate remedy before the appropriate High Court. The court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the said liberty.
Supreme Court of India Order dated 21_10_2016 against Writ Petition Criminal ...
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Om Prakash and another against the State of Bihar regarding a criminal case. After hearing from both parties, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition but allowed the petitioners to approach the High Court on the matter.
30052 2019 4_5_17733_order_25-oct-2019
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Mukesh Gupta against the State of Chhattisgarh regarding phone tapping and appropriate orders. Senior advocates from both sides were present. The Court ordered that phone tapping of the petitioner be stopped immediately as assured by the senior counsel for the respondent. The Court also ordered that the interim order will continue and the petitioner should not be harassed or arrested until the next hearing.
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
A journalist named Aman Chopra filed a petition claiming three FIRs were registered against him for the same act of airing a discussion show and posting it on Twitter, which allegedly led to communal disharmony. The petitioner argued that the investigation of the subsequent two FIRs should not proceed as they were filed maliciously to harass him. The court issued notices to the respondents and granted the petitioner protection from arrest in the two subsequent FIRs until further orders, as the investigation of multiple FIRs for the same cause of action is not permissible according to Supreme Court judgments.
State v anwar hussain
1) Anwar Hussain applied for bail in an ongoing criminal case where he has been charged with rioting and murder that took place on February 24, 2020 near Kardampuri Pulia in Delhi during sectarian riots.
2) The prosecution opposed bail, arguing that Anwar was seen actively participating in the riots based on eyewitness accounts and CCTV footage. However, the footage was from February 23 and not the date of the incident.
3) Considering that the video evidence did not pertain to the date of the incident, the time Anwar has already spent in custody, and the circumstances of the case, the court granted bail to Anwar subject to certain conditions.
20200921 s consexworkers
1. The Supreme Court of India heard an application (IA) regarding providing relief such as monthly dry rations and cash transfers to sex workers without requiring proof of identity.
2. The Court directed the applicant's counsel to serve the respondent states a copy of the application and the registry to email it to all states immediately.
3. The Court directed the Additional Solicitor General and state government counsels to obtain instructions on modalities for distributing relief to sex workers without identity proof and listed the matter for further hearing on September 29th.
Hapur Lynching
The document discusses a Supreme Court of India case involving a writ petition. At a hearing, the petitioner's counsel drew attention to statements made in an additional affidavit filed by the Superintendent of Police. The Court decided not to direct the investigating agency to file a supplementary charge-sheet, but instead permitted the petitioners to draw the trial judge's attention to statements made under Section 164 of the CrPC and deferred further hearing until after the summer vacation.
20190828 s cordersitaramyechurikashmir
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Sitaram Yechury, General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), seeking the production of Mohammad Yousuf Tarigami, a party member and former member of the Jammu & Kashmir Legislative Assembly. Yechury complained that he had been unable to meet or inquire about Tarigami's welfare due to being denied entry to Jammu & Kashmir. The Court permitted Yechury to travel to Jammu & Kashmir to meet Tarigami and inquire about his health and welfare, but for no other purpose. The Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police in Jammu & Kashmir to facilitate Yechury's travel and help
Supreme Court Order on GN Saibaba Bail Case (04.04.2016)
The Supreme Court of India was hearing a petition for special leave to appeal regarding the conviction of Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba. In the previous hearing, the Court had directed the trial court to hold day-to-day proceedings to record statements of all material witnesses by a certain date. In this hearing, the state of Maharashtra informed the Court that all material witnesses have been examined and cross-examined. However, 8 formal witnesses remained. The Court observed that since all material witnesses were examined, continuing detention of the petitioner was unfair given his medical condition. Therefore, the Court directed the petitioner's release on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court.
SC imposes 25k cost order.pdf
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition. It notes that the petition was called in the mentioning board before Justices Kaul and Oka. The court ordered the petition to be listed on December 5th and for the respondent to file their counter affidavit within two weeks, after which it will only be accepted if Rs. 25,000 costs are deposited with the court. A copy of the order is to be issued to the respondent's counsel.
SC order on Assam illegal migrants in detention centres
Supreme Court of India on Feb 19, 2019 came down heavily on Assam government for poor conditions in detention centres for illegal migrants and keeping them far too long against their sentence
20191018 sc order on hajela transfer
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding several writ petitions and interim applications. It summarizes that the Court, after hearing from lawyers representing various parties, ordered the inter-cadre transfer of Mr. Prateek Hajela, the State Coordinator for the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, to the state of Madhya Pradesh on deputation for the maximum period allowed under relevant rules. The notification for this transfer must be issued within 7 days. All other issues in the case will be heard again by the Court on November 26, 2019.
Sc sudarshan news order 23-sep-2020
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Firoz Iqbal Khan against the Union of India and others. It summarizes the hearing held on September 23, 2020. During the hearing, the Solicitor General requested deferring the hearing to allow the central government time to issue a notice to Sudarshan News and take action. The court agreed to defer the hearing to October 5, 2020 and ordered the notice's proceedings and any actions to be subject to the outcome of this case. The interim order from September 15, 2020 will remain in effect until further orders.
3 274 20092020_01_06
The Supreme Court of India heard several matters related to citizenship in Assam. It granted the Attorney General of India 4 weeks to file a reply on one matter and granted the State of Assam 4 weeks to file replies on other matters related to interlocutory applications. The Attorney General stated that children of parents given citizenship will not be separated from parents and sent to detention centers pending the application's decision.
Sc sedition plea dismissed order 09-feb-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Aditya Ranjan and others against the Union of India and others. After hearing arguments from both sides, the court dismissed the writ petition. All pending interlocutory applications related to the writ petition were also disposed of.
Sc order 29.08.2018 activist arrest
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Romila Thapar and others against the Union of India and others. The Court issued a notice to the respondents and ordered them to file a counter affidavit by September 5, 2018. As an interim measure, the Court ordered that if Varavara Rao, Arun Ferreira and Vernon Gonsalves are arrested, they must be kept under house arrest at their own homes, extending the existing house arrest orders for Gautam Navalakha and Sudha Bharadwaj passed by the High Court. The matter was listed for further hearing on September 6, 2018.
Supreme Court Order
Prominent Indians from across the political spectrum, historian Romila Thapar, academic Devaki Jain, left economist, professor Prabhat Patnaik, professor of s0ciology Satish Deshpande and human rights lawyer, Maja Daruwala have approached the SC urging that the highest court intervenes and seeks an explanation from the Maharashtra government on the recent spate of arrests of lawyers, academics and activists.
Sc suo moto order order 19-jan-2021
The Supreme Court of India took suo moto cognizance of inadequacies and deficiencies in criminal trials in India. It constituted a committee of amici curiae to examine the issues and submit a report with proposed amendments to rules. The committee submitted its report. The Supreme Court noted that only 5 of 24 High Courts submitted responses and directed the remaining High Courts to submit substantive responses within 2 weeks or have their Registrar Generals appear before the Court. It also constituted a new committee to examine suggestions for digitizing records and facilitating timely filing of appeals by convicts to reduce delays, and directed High Courts to submit responses to this committee within 2 weeks. The matter was listed for further hearing after 4 weeks.
Gauhati hc 482 inherent juris for foreigner order
1) The petitioner, Md. Amir Khan, filed a petition seeking to quash the order that convicted him under the Foreigners Act for illegally residing in India.
2) The trial court had framed charges and the petitioner had pled guilty, receiving a two year prison sentence and fine.
3) The petitioner now claims he is not a foreigner but a citizen of Tripura, India based on birth and school documents. However, he did not provide these documents during the investigation or trial.
4) The high court dismissed the petition, finding no illegality in the trial court's order since the petitioner pled guilty without presenting any evidence and the documents are produced only after appealing the conviction.
Order_25-Aug-2023.pdffrZFrffrgfrtfrfrrfrrdd
2023 (और उससे पहले 2022) में सुप्रीम कोर्ट द्वारा नफरत फैलाने वाले भाषण पर अंकुश लगाने के लिए जारी किए गए कई दिशानिर्देशों के बावजूद हेट स्पीच की घटनाएं सामने आती रहती हैं। नागरिक नफरत मुक्त 2024 कैसे सुनिश्चित कर सकते हैं?
Similar to Jai bhagwan daily order (20)
Supreme Court of India Order dated 21_10_2016 against Writ Petition Criminal ...
Supreme Court of India Order dated 21_10_2016 against Writ Petition Criminal ...
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
Supreme Court Order on GN Saibaba Bail Case (04.04.2016)
Supreme Court Order on GN Saibaba Bail Case (04.04.2016)
SC order on Assam illegal migrants in detention centres
SC order on Assam illegal migrants in detention centres
Recently uploaded
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
भारत सरकार द्वारा बड़े पैमाने पर व्हाट्सएप अभियान चलाए जाने से डेटा गोपनीयता, नैतिकता और चुनावों की निष्पक्षता पर सवाल उठते हैं।
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Recently uploaded (9)
Jai bhagwan daily order
- 1. ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.3 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(Criminal) No.293/2019 JAI BHAGWAN & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 05-11-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv. Ms. Anupradha Singh, Adv. Mr. Satya Mitra, AOR Mr. Rajat Kalsan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Mr. B.K. Satija, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned Standing counsel appearing for the State of Haryana accepts and waives formal notice on behalf of the said State. We direct the learned Standing counsel to file Counter Affidavit/Status Report latest by Friday, the 8th November, 2019. The concerned Senior Police Officers, who are looking into the matter, have to appear before us with relevant records on the said date. As prayed by the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, liberty is also granted to him to file Status Report in the matter. List the matter on Friday, the 8th November, 2019. (VISHAL ANAND) (RAJ RANI NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Digitally signed by GEETA AHUJA Date: 2019.11.05 15:53:55 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified