Melinda Merk, profile picture
Uploaded byMelinda Merk
3,403 views

Joint Revocable Trusts Update

This document provides an overview of joint revocable trusts (JRTs), including: - What a JRT is and its potential benefits and pitfalls - Drafting considerations for different estate planning scenarios using a JRT - Post-mortem administrative issues that can arise The document discusses various JRT structures and how they impact estate tax planning and basis adjustments at the first spouse's death. It also notes why clients and attorneys may prefer JRTs but cautions they require careful accounting of each spouse's contributions to avoid tax issues.

Law◦

Embed presentation

Melinda Merk, Esq. Regional Trust Advisor SunTrust Bank Private Wealth Management Vienna, VA Logan Helman Winn, Esq. Family Wealth Strategist GenSpring Family Offices Chevy Chase, MD Jeannette Roegge, Esq. Counsel Baker Hostetler Washington, DC
2  What are joint revocable trusts (JRTs)?  Potential planning benefits and pitfalls  Drafting considerations  Post-mortem administrative issues
3  Single revocable trust to which a married couple transfers their assets for asset management, probate avoidance, and tax planning purposes  Most commonly used in community property states to preserve the community property character of the couple’s assets  Appealing to couples in non-community property states who are reluctant to sever/divide their jointly owned assets between separate revocable trusts for each spouse
4  Avoids probate of assets owned by the decedent/grantor (provided trust is properly funded during grantor’s lifetime) ◦ Including ancillary probate of assets owned outside of the grantor’s state of domicile  Provides for ongoing management of assets in the event of incapacity during the grantor’s lifetime  Provides for the disposition of assets at the grantor’s death, including any ongoing trusts for the benefit of the grantor’s spouse, children and/or other beneficiaries
5  Under current law, each spouse has a federal estate tax exemption of up to $5 million (different exemption amount may apply for state estate tax purposes)  In non-community property states, generally one-half of the joint spousal property (JSP) is included in the deceased spouse’s estate ◦ Tracing rules apply if surviving spouse is a non-US citizen  Under the typical marital estate plan, up to $5 million of the deceased spouse’s taxable estate is directed to a “credit shelter” trust (CST) to which the deceased spouse’s estate tax exemption is allocated – any excess assets are directed to the marital share ◦ Results in zero estate tax at the first spouse’s death ◦ CST is generally not includible in the surviving spouse’s estate  Only assets titled in the deceased spouse’s sole name or revocable trust are generally available to fund the CST ◦ JSP passes automatically to the surviving spouse by right of survivorship ◦ Surviving spouse can disclaim the deceased spouse’s one-half interest in any JSP by filing a qualified disclaimer within 9 months of the deceased spouse’s death  If all or most of the couple’s assets are titled jointly, the CST will be underfunded at the first spouse’s death, and 100% of the couple’s combined assets will be includible/taxable in the surviving spouse’s estate  The new concept of “portability” of exemption between spouses, enacted under the 2010 Tax Act, may alleviate the bunching problem - but the mechanics of this election can be problematic and probability is set to expire at the end of 2012
6  Traditionally, for couples with combined assets in excess of the estate tax exemption, some or all of the JSP is divided and transferred to each spouse’s separate revocable trust, to more fully utilize each spouse’s estate tax exemption  Both spouses are typically named as co-trustees of each separate revocable trust  In VA and MD, tenancy by entirety protection can generally be maintained, even if not equally divided between each spouse’s revocable trust
7  Disclaimer Trust ◦ Qualified disclaimer of any JSP must be filed within 9 months of deceased spouse’s date of death ◦ Surviving spouse cannot accept any benefits of the disclaimed property, and cannot have a power of appointment over its disposition ◦ No guarantee that the surviving spouse will disclaim  Joint Revocable Trust
8  No separate shares are maintained during spouse’s joint lifetime - each spouse is presumed to own one-half of the trust assets  Both spouses are co-grantors and co-trustees of the trust  Trust can be amended by the couple’s mutual consent  Each spouse retains the right to income and principal from the trust as the spouses jointly direct during their lifetime  Each spouse typically retains a unilateral right to revoke and acquire one- half of the trust ◦ Results in a completed gift of one-half of any separately owned property upon transfer to the trust  Generally qualifies for marital deduction under IRC Section 2523(e) (life estate with power of appointment in donee spouse) ◦ If one spouse partially revokes and withdraws less than one-half of the trust assets, the trustee is directed to distribute the same value to the other spouse  Maintains each spouse’s share at the same percentage (50%)
9  Scenario #1: No Tax Planning ◦ First spouse to die retains a general power of appointment over one-half of the trust assets; in default of such exercise, entire trust continues for surviving spouse  Surviving spouse has right to revoke/amend over entire trust  Results in a stepped-up basis of ½ of the trust assets at the first spouse’s death  100% of trust assets are includible in the surviving spouse’s estate
10  Scenario #2: Disclaimer Trust ◦ First spouse to die retains a general power of appointment over one-half of the trust assets; in default of such exercise, entire trust continues for surviving spouse, but he/she can make a qualified disclaimer of up to one-half of the trust assets to Disclaimer Trust  Surviving spouse has not right to revoke, amend or appoint over the Disclaimer Trust  Surviving spouse’s interest in Disclaimer Trust is limited to an ascertainable standard  Results in stepped-up basis of ½ of the trust assets at the first spouse’s death  Disclaimer Trust is not includible in surviving spouse’s estate
11  Scenario #3: Equalizing Joint Trust ◦ First spouse to die retains a general power of appointment over one-half of the trust assets; in default of such exercise, the decedent’s one-half share of the trust assets (up to his/her remaining exemption amount) is directed to CST  Surviving spouse has not right to revoke or amend CST  Surviving spouse’s interest in the CST is limited to an ascertainable standard  Generally, results in stepped-up basis of ½ of the trust assets at the first spouse’s death  Unless the grantor who contributed the lesser amount of property dies within 1 year of funding [IRC Section 1014(e)]  CST is not includible in surviving spouse’s estate
12  Scenario #4: Fully Funded CST ◦ First spouse to die retains a general power of appointment over 100% of the trust assets  Results in 100% inclusion of the trust assets in the deceased spouse’s estate  Assets up to the deceased spouse’s remaining estate tax exemption are allocated by formula to a CST  Surviving spouse has not right to revoke or amend CST  Surviving spouse’s interest in the CST is limited to an ascertainable standard ◦ Same approach could be used using two separate revocable trusts
13  Scenario #4: Fully Funded CST (cont’d) ◦ IRS has denied full basis adjustment under IRC Section 1014(e), based on position that the deceased spouse acquired the survivor’s contribution by gift at his/her death, and the survivor then simultaneously reacquired such property from the decedent  See PLRs 2001-01-021 and 2002-10-051  Stepped-up basis is only available for the trust assets allocable to deceased spouse’s contribution to the trust  Hard to determine if separate property/unequal contributions are made to the trust, and separate shares are not maintained ◦ 1st spouse to die is considered the transferor of 100% of the trust assets – as a result, the above rulings held that CST assets were not includible in surviving spouse’s estate
14  Separate shares/schedules are maintained for joint property and for any separate property transferred to the trust  Both spouses are co-grantors and co-trustees of the trust  Trust can be amended by the couple’s mutual consent  Each spouse retains the right to income and principal from the joint property, as well as from his or her share of separate property  Each spouse typically retains a unilateral right to revoke and acquire one-half of the joint property, as well as her or her respective share of separate property ◦ Renders any interspousal gift of separate property incomplete for gift tax purposes, so long as separate shares are maintained
15  JRT is typically divided into “Survivor’s Trust” and “Exemption Trust” ◦ Survivor’s Trust consists of the surviving spouse’s one-half interest in the joint property, as well as his or her separate property ◦ Exemption Trust consists of the deceased spouse’s one-half interest in the joint property, as well as his or her separate property – up to the decedent’s remaining exemption amount  Any amount in excess of the exemption amount is directed to the Survivor’s (Marital) Trust  Either entire trust becomes irrevocable, or surviving spouse retains right to revoke/amend Survivor’s Trust only  Typical credit shelter and marital trust provisions apply to each respective share
16  Why do clients (and attorneys) like JRTs? ◦ Married couples generally believe their assets are owned by both spouses (they may object to dividing them to fund two separate revocable trusts)  Suggestion: make the spouses co-trustees of the two separate revocable trusts ◦ Preservation of community property under applicable state law (important for step-up in basis issues) ◦ Some practitioners believe that a JRT is simpler to draft and administer because it’s easier to contribute assets (don’t have to split assets and then contribute to fund two separate revocable trusts)  Issue: only true if there is no estate tax planning, because JRTs require detailed and careful accountings of each spouse’s contributions to avoid adverse tax consequences
17  When to use a JRT? ◦ Community Property Clients w/Existing Joint Trusts  Clients have an existing JRT from a community property state  Current Community Property States:  Alaska (optional), Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin (and Puerto Rico)
18  Community Property ◦ Generally, property acquired by spouses during their marriage while domiciled in a community property state is deemed to have been acquired by both equally regardless of which spouse actually contributed the property ◦ Each spouse owns a one-half interest in all such property, regardless of title  Separate Property (in Community Property Jurisdictions) ◦ Property acquired before the marriage ◦ Property acquired by gift, bequest, devise, or descent ◦ Property acquired as separate property while domiciled in a separate property state remains separate ◦ Property bought with, or exchanged for, separate property remains separate property ◦ Property converted from community property through a valid agreement (transmutation agreement) becomes separate property
19  Community Property at Death ◦ One-half of the value of community property owned by a married couple is includable in the estate of the deceased spouse for estate tax purposes ◦ However, the value of both spouses' shares of the property is stepped up or down to fair market value at the death of the first spouse  An alternate valuation date, six months after the deceased spouse's death, may also be used
20  The Mobile Community Property Client ◦ Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act (UDCPRDA)  Adopted by Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Virginia, and Wyoming  Applies to personal property, wherever situated, that is community property under the laws of a state, as well as to personal property that is traceable to community property  Applies to real property located in the state adopting the UDCPRDA that was acquired with the “rents, issues or income of, or the proceeds from, or in exchange for” community property
21  The Mobile Community Property Client ◦ Community Property Removed to Common Law Jurisdiction  Presumes that property acquired during marriage while the spouses were domiciled in a community property jurisdiction is community property  Further, personal property generally retains its status (community or separate) regardless of where the spouses move (unless assets are commingled and cannot be traced)  i.e., If spouses acquire property and earn income in a community property state, and then move to a separate property state, the property and income already acquired retains its community property status
22  The Mobile Community Property Client ◦ Existing Joint Revocable Trust  Recent client example: Elder clients moved from New Mexico to Washington, D.C. All of their property is community property and titled in the name of their joint revocable trust. After careful consideration, decided not to sever the trust into separate revocable trusts, in order to not taint any of community property and to maintain the ability to step up the basis of all assets at the first spouse’s death.
23  Trust Funding ◦ Clearly define shares of JRT assets (for tracing and funding purposes) – Example:  Share A – H’s separate property  Share B – W’s separate property  Share C – Community property  Share D – Joint property (other than community property (i.e., was separate property, but spouses intend to be joint)
24  Drafting Tip: Clearly define shares of JRT assets: H’s separate share, W’s separate share, and joint assets ◦ Sample: The trust estate consists of all assets held in the Trust by the Trustee as of this date, and assets listed on Schedules A, B, C, and D, which together with any assets later added to this Trust are referred to as the "Trust Estate." All assets listed on Schedule A have been conveyed to the Trustee and represent a portion of HUSBAND's share of the Trust Estate. All assets listed on Schedule B have been conveyed to the Trustee and represent a portion of WIFE's share of the Trust Estate. We have jointly conveyed any assets listed on Schedule C to the Trustee that were owned by us as joint tenants with rights of survivorship, as tenants by the entirety, as tenants in common, or as community property. Each of us has conveyed the property listed on Schedule D that is or was presently owned by one or the other of us, but is intended to be owned equally. Each of us intends that all assets contributed by one of us and listed on a respective Schedule A or B be allocated to that Grantor's share of the Trust. Any assets listed on either Schedule C or D are to be allocated equally to each Grantor's share of the Trust, so that each of our shares of those assets is equal to one-half of the total value of those assets.
25  JRTs for Common Law Jurisdiction Client ◦ Advantages of Joint Revocable Trusts vs. Two Revocable Trust  Avoids severing joint assets into separate trusts for each spouse  Can step-up 100% of assets at the death of the first spouse ◦ Disadvantages of Joint Revocable Trusts vs. Two Revocable Trusts  Can lose Tenancy by the Entirety creditor protection (in some states, including MD and VA, revocable trusts can maintain TbyE creditor protection)  Much more complex to administer  Hard to trace assets unless clients kept good records  Tax problems (see next slide)
26  Tax problems relating to JRTs for Common Law Jurisdiction Clients  Nondeductible interspousal gift upon trust creation  Trap: Typically, transfers to a revocable trust are NOT taxable gifts because the donor does not part with dominion or control over the assets. However, the transfer of property to a JRT will be considered a taxable gift to the extent the grantor does not reserve the right to reacquire ownership of the grantor’s transferred asset.  Note: Assets will not qualify for the gift tax marital deduction if the terms of the trust give the donee spouse a “nondeductible terminal interest” – i.e., if the trust permits distributions during the surviving spouse’s lifetime to someone other than the donee spouse or his or her estate.  Solution: Result can be avoided if each spouse retains the right to revoke the trust with respect to all separate property contributed to the trust and to each spouse's share of all contributed property previously held jointly by the spouses.  Gift to remainder beneficiaries upon trust creation  Trap: A reserved right to revoke a trust and reacquire the transferred assets does not render a gift incomplete if the power is exercisable only with the consent of a person who has a substantial interest in the trust that is adverse to the exercise of the settlor's power of revocation. For example, a spouse's transfer to a joint trust that can be revoked only by the joint action of the spouses will be a completed taxable gift on the creation of the trust.  Solution: Result can be avoided if each spouse retains the right to revoke the trust with respect to all separate property contributed to the trust and to each spouse's share of all contributed property previously held jointly by the spouses.
27  JRTs for Common Law Jurisdiction Client ◦ Special tax problems relating to Joint Revocable Trusts  Gift to Remainder Beneficiaries at Death of First Spouse  A completed gift to the contingent beneficiaries may occur if some or all of the surviving spouse’s assets are used to fund the credit shelter trust at the death of the first spouse.  Moreover, if the surviving spouse receives an income interest in the same credit shelter trust, the IRS could argue that all or part of the credit shelter trust is includable in the surviving spouse’s estate.  Estate Taxation of Jointly-Owned Property Transferred to a JRT  If the surviving spouse receives an income interest in a credit shelter trust to which he or she contributed assets upon the death of the first spouse, the IRS could argue that all or part of the credit shelter trust is includable in the surviving spouse’s estate.
28  Drafting Tip: Each spouse should have the ability to revoke his/her separate share and ½ of the joint assets ◦ Sample: We reserve the following personal rights with respect to our individual separate shares of the Trust:  To amend or revoke this Trust;  To remove a Trustee and to designate a new Trustee;  To withdraw assets, whether income or principal, from the Trust Estate;  To require changes in the investments of the Trust Estate;  To direct the Trustee to perform any act of administration; and  To direct the Trustee to make distributions to any person. This Trust may be revoked as to community property held hereunder by either Grantor. This Trust may be revoked as to any quasi-community property or separate property held hereunder by the Grantor who transferred such property to the Trust. In the event of such revocation, or withdrawal (1) the community property or the revoked portion thereof, shall revert to the Grantors as their community property. (2) The property held in the individual separate shares which are not community property and any quasi- community property (if recognized under state law) shall revert as that Grantor's separate or quasi-community property as if this Trust had not been created.
29  When is it NOT necessarily appropriate to use a JRT? ◦ Client has existing JRT from a non-community property state (i.e., client does NOT have any community property) ◦ What to do:  Sever the JRT into two separate revocable trusts  Sever client’s assets between two separate revocable trusts
30  Drafting Tip: Clearly define property character of JRT assets ◦ Sample: It is the Grantors’ intention that all community property transferred to the Trust Estate and the proceeds thereof shall retain their character as community property during the joint lifetime of the Grantors subject, however, to all the terms and conditions of this instrument. Similarly, it is the Grantors’ intention that quasi-community (if recognized under state law) and separate property of the Grantors and the proceeds thereof which may hereafter become part of this Trust shall also retain their character during the joint lifetime of the Grantors subject also to all the terms and conditions of this Trust agreement. It is the Grantors’ intention that the Trustee shall have no more extensive power over any community property transferred to the Trust Estate than either of the Grantors would have had under law, had this Trust not been created, and this instrument shall be so interpreted to achieve this intention. This limitation shall terminate on the death of either Grantor.
31  What happens to the assets held in the JRT after the death of the first spouse to die (the “Decedent”)? ◦ Look closely at the actual terms of the JRT and the schedules to the JRT ◦ Typically see 2 scenarios: separate shares or one-half JRT property ◦ Decedent’s Share and Survivor’s Share (1/2 all trust property OR ½ joint property and all Decedent’s separate property) ◦ Separate the Survivor’s Share as soon as possible but it make time to determine such share ◦ Although disposition terms for Decedent’s Share may be familiar (credit shelter trust, marital share), determining Decedent’s Share may be more difficult ◦ • Be prepared to do some forensic work to determine title of assets upon contribution to the trust
32  What trust assets are included in the Decedent’s taxable estate? ◦ Look at the powers retained by the Decedent during lifetime (power to revoke and general power of appointment (“GPOA”) over all trust assets) ◦ The power to revoke during results in inclusion of assets over which Decedent had the power under Section 2038 ◦ GPOA over assets at death results in inclusion under §2041 ◦ GPOA purposely included to trigger inclusion of all assets in JRT to fully fund credit shelter ◦ There are PLRs which support the GPOA intended result, BUT you don’t get step up [Section 1014(e)] for Surviving Spouse’s Assets in credit shelter ◦ There is a risk that the IRS’ position could change
33  Other Practical Administrative Concerns ◦ Don’t trust Survivor’s recollection of title of assets!! Check title and ownership at time of contribution early on ◦ Fiduciary Returns--Section 645 election is available ◦ Get tax ID for Decedent’s Share of trust during administration ◦ There may be a probate estate ◦ Very important to bring the accountant into the process early so that fiduciary returns and accountings are not overwhelming ◦ Basis issues? There may not be a full step up for assets in Credit Shelter Trust because of Section 1014(e)
34  Consider Having Survivor Restate His or Her Share of JRT ◦ Clean up trust instrument ◦ Can do it as a restatement of Survivor’s Share instead of a revocation ◦ May need to revise designations on accounts ◦ Make sure surviving spouse’s SSN is on the accounts
35  Additional resources ◦ “Joint Revocable Trusts for Married Couples Domiciled in Common Law Property States,” Melinda Merk, 32 Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal (Summer 1997) ◦ “The Joint Trust: Estate Planning in a New Environment,” John H. Martin, 39 Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal (Summer 2004)  Questions?

More Related Content

PPT
Changing Trust Situs; Forum Shopping for Trusts
byMelinda Merk
 
PPTX
Income Taxation of Trusts in Missouri
byPaul Vogel
 
PDF
Top Ten Estate Planning Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
byMelinda Merk
 
PPTX
Heckerling 2014 Estate Tax Breifing
byDominic Pepper
 
PPT
Turbocharging Your Estate Plan
byMelinda Merk
 
PDF
May 2015
byPhilip Fulco
 
PPTX
Income and Wealth Transfer Tax Aspects of Joint Trusts
byMelinda Merk
 
PPT
Breaking up
byEstate Planning Council of Abbotsford
 
Changing Trust Situs; Forum Shopping for Trusts
byMelinda Merk
 
Income Taxation of Trusts in Missouri
byPaul Vogel
 
Top Ten Estate Planning Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
byMelinda Merk
 
Heckerling 2014 Estate Tax Breifing
byDominic Pepper
 
Turbocharging Your Estate Plan
byMelinda Merk
 
May 2015
byPhilip Fulco
 
Income and Wealth Transfer Tax Aspects of Joint Trusts
byMelinda Merk
 
Breaking up
byEstate Planning Council of Abbotsford
 

What's hot

PDF
Spousal maintenance
byWilliam Sloan
 
PPTX
What Every Realtor Needs to Know about Estate Planning & Probate and Selling ...
byPaul Saba
 
PPTX
Emerging and Dynamic Trust Laws
byMcKonly & Asbury, LLP
 
PPTX
Family Law Basics
byJasonCheung342
 
PPT
Protect Your Assets Through A Living Trust
byLaughlin Associates
 
PPT
Legacy & Estate Planning Basics
byDon West, Jr.
 
PPT
Planning for Retirement and Your Estate Plan
bygwirt
 
PPT
Life Insurance Trusts and Charitable Planning Techniques
byscoop85
 
PPT
2009 Estate Planning Program
byrlechevallier
 
PPTX
Webinar - Underatanding death benefit nominations
byThe SMSF Academy Pty Ltd
 
PPSX
Kfs ilit
byroowah1
 
PDF
GETTING MARRIED? READ THIS FIRST
byNatasha Schwartz-Ebersohn
 
PPTX
Dan Borst Power Point Presentation 2015 Tax Symposium
byDaniel Borst
 
PDF
Guide to living trusts
byA.W. Berry
 
PDF
What Does the Supreme Court Ruling on the Health-Care Reform Law Mean for You?
byJeff Green
 
PPTX
A beginners guide to divorce settlements
byBolt Burdon
 
Spousal maintenance
byWilliam Sloan
 
What Every Realtor Needs to Know about Estate Planning & Probate and Selling ...
byPaul Saba
 
Emerging and Dynamic Trust Laws
byMcKonly & Asbury, LLP
 
Family Law Basics
byJasonCheung342
 
Protect Your Assets Through A Living Trust
byLaughlin Associates
 
Legacy & Estate Planning Basics
byDon West, Jr.
 
Planning for Retirement and Your Estate Plan
bygwirt
 
Life Insurance Trusts and Charitable Planning Techniques
byscoop85
 
2009 Estate Planning Program
byrlechevallier
 
Webinar - Underatanding death benefit nominations
byThe SMSF Academy Pty Ltd
 
Kfs ilit
byroowah1
 
GETTING MARRIED? READ THIS FIRST
byNatasha Schwartz-Ebersohn
 
Dan Borst Power Point Presentation 2015 Tax Symposium
byDaniel Borst
 
Guide to living trusts
byA.W. Berry
 
What Does the Supreme Court Ruling on the Health-Care Reform Law Mean for You?
byJeff Green
 
A beginners guide to divorce settlements
byBolt Burdon
 

Similar to Joint Revocable Trusts Update

PDF
Estate & Gift Tax Planning That You Should Consider Before the Election
byCitrin Cooperman
 
PPTX
An Introduction to Trusts
byThe Law Office of Hale Stewart
 
PDF
What is a Revocable Trust?
bydean8small7
 
PPT
Estate planning revocable trust wayne lippman
byWayne Lippman
 
PPT
Taxation of Testamentary Trusts, October 19, 2016
byEstate Planning Council of Abbotsford
 
PPT
Basic Estate Planning Concepts
byDBL Law
 
PPTX
Jeopardy Estate & Trusts (week 6)
byDonna Kesot
 
DOC
Bequest Administration for Non-Profits
byBeth McNally
 
DOCX
Explanation of a Revocable Living Trust Agreement.new
bySue Reid
 
PPTX
Rubik's Cube of Estate Planning Ideas for Estates under $10MM
byDominic Pepper
 
PPTX
Special Tax Briefing: Update for 2014
byDominic Pepper
 
PPTX
Tax planning picking up the pieces
byadministrator2
 
PPTX
Tax planning "Picking up the pieces"
byadministrator2
 
PPTX
2011 - 2012 Estate Planning Update
byYanowitzLaw
 
PPTX
Estate Planning in 2015 (Atra, ILIT, UPIA, 1035 And Policy Review )
byBSMG | Brokers' Service Marketing Group
 
PPTX
2011 - 2012 Estate Planning Update
byYanowitzLaw
 
PPTX
Kenneth Peace Presentation
byStacie OBrien
 
PPTX
A Tax and Privacy Haven: Coming to America
byMcKonly & Asbury, LLP
 
PDF
Jeffrey Burr Cpe Presentation 6 10 10
byjasbow75
 
DOCX
Mr. and Mrs. Ybarra, a retired couple in their late 70s, come in to .docx
byclairbycraft
 
Estate & Gift Tax Planning That You Should Consider Before the Election
byCitrin Cooperman
 
An Introduction to Trusts
byThe Law Office of Hale Stewart
 
What is a Revocable Trust?
bydean8small7
 
Estate planning revocable trust wayne lippman
byWayne Lippman
 
Taxation of Testamentary Trusts, October 19, 2016
byEstate Planning Council of Abbotsford
 
Basic Estate Planning Concepts
byDBL Law
 
Jeopardy Estate & Trusts (week 6)
byDonna Kesot
 
Bequest Administration for Non-Profits
byBeth McNally
 
Explanation of a Revocable Living Trust Agreement.new
bySue Reid
 
Rubik's Cube of Estate Planning Ideas for Estates under $10MM
byDominic Pepper
 
Special Tax Briefing: Update for 2014
byDominic Pepper
 
Tax planning picking up the pieces
byadministrator2
 
Tax planning "Picking up the pieces"
byadministrator2
 
2011 - 2012 Estate Planning Update
byYanowitzLaw
 
Estate Planning in 2015 (Atra, ILIT, UPIA, 1035 And Policy Review )
byBSMG | Brokers' Service Marketing Group
 
2011 - 2012 Estate Planning Update
byYanowitzLaw
 
Kenneth Peace Presentation
byStacie OBrien
 
A Tax and Privacy Haven: Coming to America
byMcKonly & Asbury, LLP
 
Jeffrey Burr Cpe Presentation 6 10 10
byjasbow75
 
Mr. and Mrs. Ybarra, a retired couple in their late 70s, come in to .docx
byclairbycraft
 

Recently uploaded

PDF
Most Inspirational Leaders in Law of 2026
bytimeiconic007
 
PDF
Inheritance: How to Avoid Family Disputes
byDr Edgar Paltzer
 
PDF
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (1).pdf
byAnupriyaPrasad
 
PDF
Cantoment civil aviation.pdf2026 - Year of Action: ORAL will no longer be VERBAL
bybusinessweekghana
 
PDF
Fake La land deal 1.pdf2026 - Year of Action: ORAL will no longer be VERBAL
bybusinessweekghana
 
PDF
FY2027 H1B Cap Filing Secrets: Why You Should Plan Now?
byVisaPro Immigration Services LLC
 
PPTX
Arts University Plymouth Transcripts
byjp47f9p04u
 
PDF
85-108+Vanessa,+Gunawan+Djajaputra(1).pdf
bysianturiyohanaputri0
 
PDF
Final Judgment Angelina Martinz v Isabel Maria Aguilar Broward Case No. CACE-...
byRaymond R. Dieppa
 
PDF
Shamir hospital deciding that I do not a guardian need for guardian
byHaim R. Branisteanu
 
PDF
Attorney Raymond Dieppa Secures $3 Million Settlement for Paralyzed Worker Fo...
byRaymond R. Dieppa
 
PDF
122392022_2024-11-13-bulldozer-justice-judgment-1.pdf
bysabranghindi
 
PDF
Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) & Abortion Rights in India- A Comprehe...
bySiddharthNair96
 
PDF
ADR. Part one Definition and Basic features
byyusufwerkineh4
 
PDF
Verdict Form - Glen Blanco v Paul Jerome Miami-Dade Case No. 2018-034632-CA-01
byRaymond R. Dieppa
 
PPTX
Labour Codes 2025, ppt on new labour codes
byYASHJAIN886310
 
PDF
Cecilia Alvarez v Supreme Rent a Car jury verdict $5,643,981.00 (Miami-Dade 2...
byRaymond R. Dieppa
 
PDF
The Architecture of Sovereignty: A Comprehensive Analysis of Recognition unde...
by Judge Nazmul Hasan.
 
PDF
For-Website-251218-CJP-complaint-to-NCM-on-hate-speech-vigilantism-etc-target...
bysabranghindi
 
PDF
Claudia Barber Laurel MD - An Educator
byClaudia Barber Laurel MD
 
Most Inspirational Leaders in Law of 2026
bytimeiconic007
 
Inheritance: How to Avoid Family Disputes
byDr Edgar Paltzer
 
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (1).pdf
byAnupriyaPrasad
 
Cantoment civil aviation.pdf2026 - Year of Action: ORAL will no longer be VERBAL
bybusinessweekghana
 
Fake La land deal 1.pdf2026 - Year of Action: ORAL will no longer be VERBAL
bybusinessweekghana
 
FY2027 H1B Cap Filing Secrets: Why You Should Plan Now?
byVisaPro Immigration Services LLC
 
Arts University Plymouth Transcripts
byjp47f9p04u
 
85-108+Vanessa,+Gunawan+Djajaputra(1).pdf
bysianturiyohanaputri0
 
Final Judgment Angelina Martinz v Isabel Maria Aguilar Broward Case No. CACE-...
byRaymond R. Dieppa
 
Shamir hospital deciding that I do not a guardian need for guardian
byHaim R. Branisteanu
 
Attorney Raymond Dieppa Secures $3 Million Settlement for Paralyzed Worker Fo...
byRaymond R. Dieppa
 
122392022_2024-11-13-bulldozer-justice-judgment-1.pdf
bysabranghindi
 
Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) & Abortion Rights in India- A Comprehe...
bySiddharthNair96
 
ADR. Part one Definition and Basic features
byyusufwerkineh4
 
Verdict Form - Glen Blanco v Paul Jerome Miami-Dade Case No. 2018-034632-CA-01
byRaymond R. Dieppa
 
Labour Codes 2025, ppt on new labour codes
byYASHJAIN886310
 
Cecilia Alvarez v Supreme Rent a Car jury verdict $5,643,981.00 (Miami-Dade 2...
byRaymond R. Dieppa
 
The Architecture of Sovereignty: A Comprehensive Analysis of Recognition unde...
by Judge Nazmul Hasan.
 
For-Website-251218-CJP-complaint-to-NCM-on-hate-speech-vigilantism-etc-target...
bysabranghindi
 
Claudia Barber Laurel MD - An Educator
byClaudia Barber Laurel MD
 

Joint Revocable Trusts Update

  • 1.
    Melinda Merk, Esq. RegionalTrust Advisor SunTrust Bank Private Wealth Management Vienna, VA Logan Helman Winn, Esq. Family Wealth Strategist GenSpring Family Offices Chevy Chase, MD Jeannette Roegge, Esq. Counsel Baker Hostetler Washington, DC
  • 2.
    2  What arejoint revocable trusts (JRTs)?  Potential planning benefits and pitfalls  Drafting considerations  Post-mortem administrative issues
  • 3.
    3  Single revocabletrust to which a married couple transfers their assets for asset management, probate avoidance, and tax planning purposes  Most commonly used in community property states to preserve the community property character of the couple’s assets  Appealing to couples in non-community property states who are reluctant to sever/divide their jointly owned assets between separate revocable trusts for each spouse
  • 4.
    4  Avoids probateof assets owned by the decedent/grantor (provided trust is properly funded during grantor’s lifetime) ◦ Including ancillary probate of assets owned outside of the grantor’s state of domicile  Provides for ongoing management of assets in the event of incapacity during the grantor’s lifetime  Provides for the disposition of assets at the grantor’s death, including any ongoing trusts for the benefit of the grantor’s spouse, children and/or other beneficiaries
  • 5.
    5  Under currentlaw, each spouse has a federal estate tax exemption of up to $5 million (different exemption amount may apply for state estate tax purposes)  In non-community property states, generally one-half of the joint spousal property (JSP) is included in the deceased spouse’s estate ◦ Tracing rules apply if surviving spouse is a non-US citizen  Under the typical marital estate plan, up to $5 million of the deceased spouse’s taxable estate is directed to a “credit shelter” trust (CST) to which the deceased spouse’s estate tax exemption is allocated – any excess assets are directed to the marital share ◦ Results in zero estate tax at the first spouse’s death ◦ CST is generally not includible in the surviving spouse’s estate  Only assets titled in the deceased spouse’s sole name or revocable trust are generally available to fund the CST ◦ JSP passes automatically to the surviving spouse by right of survivorship ◦ Surviving spouse can disclaim the deceased spouse’s one-half interest in any JSP by filing a qualified disclaimer within 9 months of the deceased spouse’s death  If all or most of the couple’s assets are titled jointly, the CST will be underfunded at the first spouse’s death, and 100% of the couple’s combined assets will be includible/taxable in the surviving spouse’s estate  The new concept of “portability” of exemption between spouses, enacted under the 2010 Tax Act, may alleviate the bunching problem - but the mechanics of this election can be problematic and probability is set to expire at the end of 2012
  • 6.
    6  Traditionally, forcouples with combined assets in excess of the estate tax exemption, some or all of the JSP is divided and transferred to each spouse’s separate revocable trust, to more fully utilize each spouse’s estate tax exemption  Both spouses are typically named as co-trustees of each separate revocable trust  In VA and MD, tenancy by entirety protection can generally be maintained, even if not equally divided between each spouse’s revocable trust
  • 7.
    7  Disclaimer Trust ◦Qualified disclaimer of any JSP must be filed within 9 months of deceased spouse’s date of death ◦ Surviving spouse cannot accept any benefits of the disclaimed property, and cannot have a power of appointment over its disposition ◦ No guarantee that the surviving spouse will disclaim  Joint Revocable Trust
  • 8.
    8  No separateshares are maintained during spouse’s joint lifetime - each spouse is presumed to own one-half of the trust assets  Both spouses are co-grantors and co-trustees of the trust  Trust can be amended by the couple’s mutual consent  Each spouse retains the right to income and principal from the trust as the spouses jointly direct during their lifetime  Each spouse typically retains a unilateral right to revoke and acquire one- half of the trust ◦ Results in a completed gift of one-half of any separately owned property upon transfer to the trust  Generally qualifies for marital deduction under IRC Section 2523(e) (life estate with power of appointment in donee spouse) ◦ If one spouse partially revokes and withdraws less than one-half of the trust assets, the trustee is directed to distribute the same value to the other spouse  Maintains each spouse’s share at the same percentage (50%)
  • 9.
    9  Scenario #1:No Tax Planning ◦ First spouse to die retains a general power of appointment over one-half of the trust assets; in default of such exercise, entire trust continues for surviving spouse  Surviving spouse has right to revoke/amend over entire trust  Results in a stepped-up basis of ½ of the trust assets at the first spouse’s death  100% of trust assets are includible in the surviving spouse’s estate
  • 10.
    10  Scenario #2:Disclaimer Trust ◦ First spouse to die retains a general power of appointment over one-half of the trust assets; in default of such exercise, entire trust continues for surviving spouse, but he/she can make a qualified disclaimer of up to one-half of the trust assets to Disclaimer Trust  Surviving spouse has not right to revoke, amend or appoint over the Disclaimer Trust  Surviving spouse’s interest in Disclaimer Trust is limited to an ascertainable standard  Results in stepped-up basis of ½ of the trust assets at the first spouse’s death  Disclaimer Trust is not includible in surviving spouse’s estate
  • 11.
    11  Scenario #3:Equalizing Joint Trust ◦ First spouse to die retains a general power of appointment over one-half of the trust assets; in default of such exercise, the decedent’s one-half share of the trust assets (up to his/her remaining exemption amount) is directed to CST  Surviving spouse has not right to revoke or amend CST  Surviving spouse’s interest in the CST is limited to an ascertainable standard  Generally, results in stepped-up basis of ½ of the trust assets at the first spouse’s death  Unless the grantor who contributed the lesser amount of property dies within 1 year of funding [IRC Section 1014(e)]  CST is not includible in surviving spouse’s estate
  • 12.
    12  Scenario #4:Fully Funded CST ◦ First spouse to die retains a general power of appointment over 100% of the trust assets  Results in 100% inclusion of the trust assets in the deceased spouse’s estate  Assets up to the deceased spouse’s remaining estate tax exemption are allocated by formula to a CST  Surviving spouse has not right to revoke or amend CST  Surviving spouse’s interest in the CST is limited to an ascertainable standard ◦ Same approach could be used using two separate revocable trusts
  • 13.
    13  Scenario #4:Fully Funded CST (cont’d) ◦ IRS has denied full basis adjustment under IRC Section 1014(e), based on position that the deceased spouse acquired the survivor’s contribution by gift at his/her death, and the survivor then simultaneously reacquired such property from the decedent  See PLRs 2001-01-021 and 2002-10-051  Stepped-up basis is only available for the trust assets allocable to deceased spouse’s contribution to the trust  Hard to determine if separate property/unequal contributions are made to the trust, and separate shares are not maintained ◦ 1st spouse to die is considered the transferor of 100% of the trust assets – as a result, the above rulings held that CST assets were not includible in surviving spouse’s estate
  • 14.
    14  Separate shares/schedulesare maintained for joint property and for any separate property transferred to the trust  Both spouses are co-grantors and co-trustees of the trust  Trust can be amended by the couple’s mutual consent  Each spouse retains the right to income and principal from the joint property, as well as from his or her share of separate property  Each spouse typically retains a unilateral right to revoke and acquire one-half of the joint property, as well as her or her respective share of separate property ◦ Renders any interspousal gift of separate property incomplete for gift tax purposes, so long as separate shares are maintained
  • 15.
    15  JRT istypically divided into “Survivor’s Trust” and “Exemption Trust” ◦ Survivor’s Trust consists of the surviving spouse’s one-half interest in the joint property, as well as his or her separate property ◦ Exemption Trust consists of the deceased spouse’s one-half interest in the joint property, as well as his or her separate property – up to the decedent’s remaining exemption amount  Any amount in excess of the exemption amount is directed to the Survivor’s (Marital) Trust  Either entire trust becomes irrevocable, or surviving spouse retains right to revoke/amend Survivor’s Trust only  Typical credit shelter and marital trust provisions apply to each respective share
  • 16.
    16  Why doclients (and attorneys) like JRTs? ◦ Married couples generally believe their assets are owned by both spouses (they may object to dividing them to fund two separate revocable trusts)  Suggestion: make the spouses co-trustees of the two separate revocable trusts ◦ Preservation of community property under applicable state law (important for step-up in basis issues) ◦ Some practitioners believe that a JRT is simpler to draft and administer because it’s easier to contribute assets (don’t have to split assets and then contribute to fund two separate revocable trusts)  Issue: only true if there is no estate tax planning, because JRTs require detailed and careful accountings of each spouse’s contributions to avoid adverse tax consequences
  • 17.
    17  When touse a JRT? ◦ Community Property Clients w/Existing Joint Trusts  Clients have an existing JRT from a community property state  Current Community Property States:  Alaska (optional), Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin (and Puerto Rico)
  • 18.
    18  Community Property ◦Generally, property acquired by spouses during their marriage while domiciled in a community property state is deemed to have been acquired by both equally regardless of which spouse actually contributed the property ◦ Each spouse owns a one-half interest in all such property, regardless of title  Separate Property (in Community Property Jurisdictions) ◦ Property acquired before the marriage ◦ Property acquired by gift, bequest, devise, or descent ◦ Property acquired as separate property while domiciled in a separate property state remains separate ◦ Property bought with, or exchanged for, separate property remains separate property ◦ Property converted from community property through a valid agreement (transmutation agreement) becomes separate property
  • 19.
    19  Community Propertyat Death ◦ One-half of the value of community property owned by a married couple is includable in the estate of the deceased spouse for estate tax purposes ◦ However, the value of both spouses' shares of the property is stepped up or down to fair market value at the death of the first spouse  An alternate valuation date, six months after the deceased spouse's death, may also be used
  • 20.
    20  The MobileCommunity Property Client ◦ Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act (UDCPRDA)  Adopted by Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Virginia, and Wyoming  Applies to personal property, wherever situated, that is community property under the laws of a state, as well as to personal property that is traceable to community property  Applies to real property located in the state adopting the UDCPRDA that was acquired with the “rents, issues or income of, or the proceeds from, or in exchange for” community property
  • 21.
    21  The MobileCommunity Property Client ◦ Community Property Removed to Common Law Jurisdiction  Presumes that property acquired during marriage while the spouses were domiciled in a community property jurisdiction is community property  Further, personal property generally retains its status (community or separate) regardless of where the spouses move (unless assets are commingled and cannot be traced)  i.e., If spouses acquire property and earn income in a community property state, and then move to a separate property state, the property and income already acquired retains its community property status
  • 22.
    22  The MobileCommunity Property Client ◦ Existing Joint Revocable Trust  Recent client example: Elder clients moved from New Mexico to Washington, D.C. All of their property is community property and titled in the name of their joint revocable trust. After careful consideration, decided not to sever the trust into separate revocable trusts, in order to not taint any of community property and to maintain the ability to step up the basis of all assets at the first spouse’s death.
  • 23.
    23  Trust Funding ◦Clearly define shares of JRT assets (for tracing and funding purposes) – Example:  Share A – H’s separate property  Share B – W’s separate property  Share C – Community property  Share D – Joint property (other than community property (i.e., was separate property, but spouses intend to be joint)
  • 24.
    24  Drafting Tip:Clearly define shares of JRT assets: H’s separate share, W’s separate share, and joint assets ◦ Sample: The trust estate consists of all assets held in the Trust by the Trustee as of this date, and assets listed on Schedules A, B, C, and D, which together with any assets later added to this Trust are referred to as the "Trust Estate." All assets listed on Schedule A have been conveyed to the Trustee and represent a portion of HUSBAND's share of the Trust Estate. All assets listed on Schedule B have been conveyed to the Trustee and represent a portion of WIFE's share of the Trust Estate. We have jointly conveyed any assets listed on Schedule C to the Trustee that were owned by us as joint tenants with rights of survivorship, as tenants by the entirety, as tenants in common, or as community property. Each of us has conveyed the property listed on Schedule D that is or was presently owned by one or the other of us, but is intended to be owned equally. Each of us intends that all assets contributed by one of us and listed on a respective Schedule A or B be allocated to that Grantor's share of the Trust. Any assets listed on either Schedule C or D are to be allocated equally to each Grantor's share of the Trust, so that each of our shares of those assets is equal to one-half of the total value of those assets.
  • 25.
    25  JRTs forCommon Law Jurisdiction Client ◦ Advantages of Joint Revocable Trusts vs. Two Revocable Trust  Avoids severing joint assets into separate trusts for each spouse  Can step-up 100% of assets at the death of the first spouse ◦ Disadvantages of Joint Revocable Trusts vs. Two Revocable Trusts  Can lose Tenancy by the Entirety creditor protection (in some states, including MD and VA, revocable trusts can maintain TbyE creditor protection)  Much more complex to administer  Hard to trace assets unless clients kept good records  Tax problems (see next slide)
  • 26.
    26  Tax problemsrelating to JRTs for Common Law Jurisdiction Clients  Nondeductible interspousal gift upon trust creation  Trap: Typically, transfers to a revocable trust are NOT taxable gifts because the donor does not part with dominion or control over the assets. However, the transfer of property to a JRT will be considered a taxable gift to the extent the grantor does not reserve the right to reacquire ownership of the grantor’s transferred asset.  Note: Assets will not qualify for the gift tax marital deduction if the terms of the trust give the donee spouse a “nondeductible terminal interest” – i.e., if the trust permits distributions during the surviving spouse’s lifetime to someone other than the donee spouse or his or her estate.  Solution: Result can be avoided if each spouse retains the right to revoke the trust with respect to all separate property contributed to the trust and to each spouse's share of all contributed property previously held jointly by the spouses.  Gift to remainder beneficiaries upon trust creation  Trap: A reserved right to revoke a trust and reacquire the transferred assets does not render a gift incomplete if the power is exercisable only with the consent of a person who has a substantial interest in the trust that is adverse to the exercise of the settlor's power of revocation. For example, a spouse's transfer to a joint trust that can be revoked only by the joint action of the spouses will be a completed taxable gift on the creation of the trust.  Solution: Result can be avoided if each spouse retains the right to revoke the trust with respect to all separate property contributed to the trust and to each spouse's share of all contributed property previously held jointly by the spouses.
  • 27.
    27  JRTs forCommon Law Jurisdiction Client ◦ Special tax problems relating to Joint Revocable Trusts  Gift to Remainder Beneficiaries at Death of First Spouse  A completed gift to the contingent beneficiaries may occur if some or all of the surviving spouse’s assets are used to fund the credit shelter trust at the death of the first spouse.  Moreover, if the surviving spouse receives an income interest in the same credit shelter trust, the IRS could argue that all or part of the credit shelter trust is includable in the surviving spouse’s estate.  Estate Taxation of Jointly-Owned Property Transferred to a JRT  If the surviving spouse receives an income interest in a credit shelter trust to which he or she contributed assets upon the death of the first spouse, the IRS could argue that all or part of the credit shelter trust is includable in the surviving spouse’s estate.
  • 28.
    28  Drafting Tip:Each spouse should have the ability to revoke his/her separate share and ½ of the joint assets ◦ Sample: We reserve the following personal rights with respect to our individual separate shares of the Trust:  To amend or revoke this Trust;  To remove a Trustee and to designate a new Trustee;  To withdraw assets, whether income or principal, from the Trust Estate;  To require changes in the investments of the Trust Estate;  To direct the Trustee to perform any act of administration; and  To direct the Trustee to make distributions to any person. This Trust may be revoked as to community property held hereunder by either Grantor. This Trust may be revoked as to any quasi-community property or separate property held hereunder by the Grantor who transferred such property to the Trust. In the event of such revocation, or withdrawal (1) the community property or the revoked portion thereof, shall revert to the Grantors as their community property. (2) The property held in the individual separate shares which are not community property and any quasi- community property (if recognized under state law) shall revert as that Grantor's separate or quasi-community property as if this Trust had not been created.
  • 29.
    29  When isit NOT necessarily appropriate to use a JRT? ◦ Client has existing JRT from a non-community property state (i.e., client does NOT have any community property) ◦ What to do:  Sever the JRT into two separate revocable trusts  Sever client’s assets between two separate revocable trusts
  • 30.
    30  Drafting Tip:Clearly define property character of JRT assets ◦ Sample: It is the Grantors’ intention that all community property transferred to the Trust Estate and the proceeds thereof shall retain their character as community property during the joint lifetime of the Grantors subject, however, to all the terms and conditions of this instrument. Similarly, it is the Grantors’ intention that quasi-community (if recognized under state law) and separate property of the Grantors and the proceeds thereof which may hereafter become part of this Trust shall also retain their character during the joint lifetime of the Grantors subject also to all the terms and conditions of this Trust agreement. It is the Grantors’ intention that the Trustee shall have no more extensive power over any community property transferred to the Trust Estate than either of the Grantors would have had under law, had this Trust not been created, and this instrument shall be so interpreted to achieve this intention. This limitation shall terminate on the death of either Grantor.
  • 31.
    31  What happensto the assets held in the JRT after the death of the first spouse to die (the “Decedent”)? ◦ Look closely at the actual terms of the JRT and the schedules to the JRT ◦ Typically see 2 scenarios: separate shares or one-half JRT property ◦ Decedent’s Share and Survivor’s Share (1/2 all trust property OR ½ joint property and all Decedent’s separate property) ◦ Separate the Survivor’s Share as soon as possible but it make time to determine such share ◦ Although disposition terms for Decedent’s Share may be familiar (credit shelter trust, marital share), determining Decedent’s Share may be more difficult ◦ • Be prepared to do some forensic work to determine title of assets upon contribution to the trust
  • 32.
    32  What trustassets are included in the Decedent’s taxable estate? ◦ Look at the powers retained by the Decedent during lifetime (power to revoke and general power of appointment (“GPOA”) over all trust assets) ◦ The power to revoke during results in inclusion of assets over which Decedent had the power under Section 2038 ◦ GPOA over assets at death results in inclusion under §2041 ◦ GPOA purposely included to trigger inclusion of all assets in JRT to fully fund credit shelter ◦ There are PLRs which support the GPOA intended result, BUT you don’t get step up [Section 1014(e)] for Surviving Spouse’s Assets in credit shelter ◦ There is a risk that the IRS’ position could change
  • 33.
    33  Other PracticalAdministrative Concerns ◦ Don’t trust Survivor’s recollection of title of assets!! Check title and ownership at time of contribution early on ◦ Fiduciary Returns--Section 645 election is available ◦ Get tax ID for Decedent’s Share of trust during administration ◦ There may be a probate estate ◦ Very important to bring the accountant into the process early so that fiduciary returns and accountings are not overwhelming ◦ Basis issues? There may not be a full step up for assets in Credit Shelter Trust because of Section 1014(e)
  • 34.
    34  Consider HavingSurvivor Restate His or Her Share of JRT ◦ Clean up trust instrument ◦ Can do it as a restatement of Survivor’s Share instead of a revocation ◦ May need to revise designations on accounts ◦ Make sure surviving spouse’s SSN is on the accounts
  • 35.
    35  Additional resources ◦“Joint Revocable Trusts for Married Couples Domiciled in Common Law Property States,” Melinda Merk, 32 Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal (Summer 1997) ◦ “The Joint Trust: Estate Planning in a New Environment,” John H. Martin, 39 Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal (Summer 2004)  Questions?