1. Mid America Chamber of Commerce Executives
Immigration, Refugees and Workforce & Business Community’s Role
May 4-6, 2016
John Keller, Executive Director
Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota
St. Paul -- Worthington -- Moorhead
(651) 641-1011 or (800) 223-1368
www.ilcm.org
3. 2015 Legal, Education & Policy
• 4,415 immigration cases benefitting 11,538.
• 800 Public defender-immigration consults.
• 104 nationalities residing in 85% of MN counties.
• 22 staff and 238 trained pro bono attorneys.
• 6 offices (full & part-time) across MN.
• 180 education, training, outreach and advocacy
events, reaching 7,200 individuals.
• Leader in MNBIC for last 9 years.
4. Why talk about immigration?
US Demographics: Between 2000 and 2050,
new immigrants and their children will
account for 83 % of the growth in the working-
age population. Without immigrants, U.S.
population cannot replace a generation of
retiring workers from 2010-2030.
Workforce Demand – immigration is key to
keeping MN (others’) workforces from
shrinking.
1920 1/5, Today: 1/14 MN’s = immigrants
5. Economics: MN Chamber report 2013
WORKERS -- Immigrants comprise 37.2% of lower-skilled
workers and 8.5% of college-educated workers in
Minnesota.
CONSUMERS--Immigrant households have an estimated
buying power of more than $5 billion on an annual basis.
TAXPAYERS--Immigrants pay an estimated $793 million
per year in state and local taxes.
ENTREPRENEURS--An estimated 44,500 Minnesota
businesses are immigrant-owned.
5
6. Immigration Statuses & Transitions
• Temporary legal immigration status,
– Visas (professionals, U-visa, student, tourist, employment)
– DACA
– Temporary Protected Status (Syria, Haiti, El Salvador, etc.)
• Refugee or Asylee (asylum seeker),
• Legal Permanent Resident,
• Naturalized U.S. citizen,
– 2nd
Generation – born to immigrant parents in the U.S.
• No current status: undocumented, overstayed a visa, or
awaiting legal status. MN 95,000; US 11.4M
6
7. Today -Three Avenues to Immigrate
U.S immigration policy is mainly based on three
things:
1. Family (65%) immigrants applying based on
close family relationship (USC or LPR)
2. Freedom (16%)
Asylee (in U.S.)/Refugee (outside of U.S.)
1. Work (13%) immigrants invited by US
employers to fill positions where there is a
shortage
(USCIS Office of Immigration Statistics, 2011 Immigration Yearbook)
11. Executive Action - Background
• Not permanent – but important first
protection for millions
• Executive defines law enforcement priorities
• Cannot deport 11.5 million (e.g.,13 year avg.
residency; 4-5 million US citizen children);
• Legislation was not going to move
• Clear history of presidents use of executive
action in immigration.
12. 2 Executive Actions- Workforce
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, DACA / DREAMers
– 2012 (first announced in June 2012,
• renewed June 2014; expanded 11/20/2014 (litigation)
• 1.5 Million est.
Deferred Action for Parental Accountability, DAPA
• 11/20/2014 (litigation – Supreme Court)
– 4.4 Million estimated nationwide
15. DACA/DAPA – MIDWEST VIEW
State Total Est. DACA 2012
(2014 expansion)
Individuals
Approved
-12/31/15
Renewals
(every 2 yrs)
Estimate DAPA
WI 14,000 (18,000) 7,100 4,700 24,000
MN 16,000 (20,000) 5,700 3,900 27,000
NE 7,000 (9,000) 3,100 2,000 14,000
IA 6,000 (8,000) 2,600 1,900 13,000
SD n/a 200 150 n/a
ND 400* (n/a) 60 80 1,400*
16. Observations on DACA - Future
• Very positive effect on DACA recipients
– First or Better job,
– Opened bank accounts,
– Reduction in Truancy – Rochester
– Driver’s License
– Dramatic drop in fear of deportation – seeing U.S. and MN as
welcoming
– Dramatic increase in civic participation – much higher than native
born citizens
• MN DREAM Act
• Future
– Unlikely Congress will act,
– Positions of Candidates on Immigration and DACA/DAPA,
– Health Insurance MN and U.S.
18. What’s Next - Immigration
• U.S. Supreme Court will likely decide DAPA by end of
June 2016,
• If in President’s favor – thousands will be looking for legal
assistance. Employers will need workshops too.
• Presidential elections will again likely be determined
by positions on immigration and voting by Latino and
Asian citizens,
• Post election – two different visions for immigration
and immigration reform depending on who wins.
• Regardless of winner, states, cities, employers and
employees, families will continue to wrestle with
complex, interrelated challenges.
19. Map the Impact of Immigration
Across the Nation
• http://www.maptheimpact.org/
20. Resources
• Check out our resources and workshops at www.ilcm.org
• For more information from the government go to
www.uscis.gov
• DACA Page: http://
www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/consideration-deferred-action-childhoo
• DAPA update: https://www.uscis.gov/immigrationaction
• Partnership for New American Economy (Bloomberg’s)
http://www.renewoureconomy.org/
• Map The Impact – Immigration in Each State
http://www.maptheimpact.org/
• Midwest preparedness for Executive Action:
http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/sites/default/files/Immi
gration%20Paper_v4-final.pdf
21. Contact INFO
How to Get Involved & Referrals
GET INVOLVED – Sign up for communications via our
clipboard or at www.ilcm.org
Facebook www.facebook.com/immigrantlawcenterMN
Twitter https://twitter.com/ilcm_mn
ILCM Annual Gala – September 9th
– sponsor and attend!
John Keller, john.keller@ilcm.org
work: (651) 641-1011, ext. 203
Cell: (651) 428-1402
www.ilcm.org
Editor's Notes
A little information about myself, my farm, law, Peru/family background. Amish and Hutterite hired hands from IA and near S. Dakota).
1920 1/5 (Languages spoken)
2012 1/14
Give a brief overview of our history, our statewide tours (where I met your president Ken Warner), our structure and both our state and federal initiatives.
In MN we had multiple meetings with business, labor, immigrants rights groups and our 2 senators (both on judiciary). ILCM also participated on the national level in trying to guide larger coalitions on our MN experience. MN Chamber executive became part of the U.S. Chamber immigration task force.
Rough Overview from August 2012 – December 2015.
*American Immigration Council data
Migration Policy Estimate using Census and ACS data 2009-2013; USCIS data.
The population eligible for the DACA program as implemented in 2012 includes unauthorized immigrant youth who had been in the United States for at least five years, were under the age of 16 at the time of their arrival, and were under the age of 31 at the time of the survey (2009 through 2013 depending on the survey year). “Immediately eligible” youth met both age and educational criteria (i.e., they were ages 15 to 30 and were either enrolled in school or had at least a high school diploma or its equivalent at the time of the survey). Youth “eligible but for education” were those ages 15 to 30 who did not have a high school diploma or equivalent and were not enrolled in school at the time of the survey. Children “eligible in the future” met the age-at-arrival requirements but were not yet 15 years old at the time of the survey, and will age into eligibility provided they stay in school.
This is the best anti-poverty program we’ve seen.
No reason to expect any other results if Parents are also allowed to apply for status.