Jefferson star chart 2010 2011
•
0 likes•147 views
Jefferson El Campus received advanced technology (STaR 3) ratings in all four key areas - teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership/administration/instructional support, and infrastructure for technology - according to its 2010-2011 Texas Campus STaR Chart Summary. The summary shows the campus earned point totals between 15-19 in each key area, indicating advanced levels of classroom technology use, educator training, administrative support, and network/device infrastructure. Principal Manuel Olivo leads the campus located in the Harlingen CISD district.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Jefferson star chart 2011 2012
This document summarizes the Texas Campus STaR Chart for Jefferson El campus in the Harlingen CISD for the 2011-2012 school year. It evaluates the campus in four key areas related to technology integration on a scale of 1 to 4. Jefferson El received scores of 3 or higher in all areas, classifying it as an "Advanced Tech" campus. The key areas were: I) Teaching and Learning, II) Educator Preparation and Development, III) Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and IV) Infrastructure for Technology. Jefferson El's principal at the time was Manuel Olivo.
Jefferson star chart 2009 2010
Jefferson El Campus in the Harlingen CISD received a STaR Chart summary for the 2009-2010 school year. The summary evaluated the campus across 4 key areas related to technology integration on a scale of 1 to 4. Key Area I on Teaching and Learning and Key Area II on Educator Preparation and Development both received scores of 13, classifying them as at the "Developing Tech" level. Key Area III on Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support received a score of 17, classified as "Advanced Tech". Key Area IV on Infrastructure for Technology received the highest score of 18, also classified as "Advanced Tech". The principal at the time was Manuel Olivo.
Campus2006chart
This document summarizes a Texas Campus STaR Chart for Elizabeth Smith Elementary School for the 2008-2009 school year. It evaluates the school across four key areas related to educational technology on a scale of 1 to 4. Elizabeth Smith Elementary scored in the "Advanced Tech" range of 3 for all four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. The chart provides further breakdowns of sub-categories within each key area, showing scores ranging from 2 to 4.
2007data
This document summarizes a Texas Campus STaR Chart for Elizabeth Smith Elementary School for the 2006-2007 school year. It evaluates the school across four key areas related to educational technology on a scale of 1 to 4. Key Area III on Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support received the highest rating of 16, classifying it as "Advanced Tech". The other three key areas - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, and Infrastructure for Technology - received ratings between 11-13 and were classified as "Developing Tech". The chart provides an overview of how the school was performing with educational technology integration based on different criteria within each key area.
2008data
This document summarizes a campus STaR Chart for Elizabeth Smith Elementary School for the 2007-2008 school year. It shows ratings from 1 to 4 in different key areas related to technology use, with higher numbers indicating more advanced technology. The key areas included Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership and Support, and Infrastructure. Elizabeth Smith Elementary received ratings of Developing Tech in Teaching and Learning, Leadership and Support, and Infrastructure, but received a rating of Advanced Tech in Educator Preparation and Development. The chart provides an overview of the school's technology implementation and capabilities.
Campus2006chart
Woodson Middle School in Houston ISD had advanced technology in teaching and learning and leadership/administration/instructional support, with total scores of 16 and 15 respectively. The school had developing technology in educator preparation and development, with a score of 12. Infrastructure for technology was the school's strongest area, with a score of 20, classified as advanced.
S Ta R Chart 2007 2008 Hyperlink Sheet
Woodson Middle School in 2007-2008 had developing technology in teaching and learning and infrastructure, with early technology in educator preparation and advanced technology in leadership, administration, and instructional support. The school scored 12 out of 16 in teaching and learning, 8 out of 16 in educator preparation, 16 out of 16 in leadership and support, and 14 out of 16 in infrastructure. Principal Linda Whitley aimed to improve technology integration across key areas.
S Ta R Chart 2008 2009
Woodson Middle School in Houston ISD had a Developing Tech rating across all key areas in the 2008-2009 school year according to the STaR Chart summary. The summary shows the school scored 12 points in Key Areas I, II, and III related to Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, and Leadership which is the Developing Tech range of 7 to 15 points. It also scored 11 points in Key Area IV on Infrastructure which is also in the Developing Tech range. The principal at the time was Linda Whitley who aimed to advance the school's technology integration in core subjects and professional development.
Recommended
Jefferson star chart 2011 2012
This document summarizes the Texas Campus STaR Chart for Jefferson El campus in the Harlingen CISD for the 2011-2012 school year. It evaluates the campus in four key areas related to technology integration on a scale of 1 to 4. Jefferson El received scores of 3 or higher in all areas, classifying it as an "Advanced Tech" campus. The key areas were: I) Teaching and Learning, II) Educator Preparation and Development, III) Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and IV) Infrastructure for Technology. Jefferson El's principal at the time was Manuel Olivo.
Jefferson star chart 2009 2010
Jefferson El Campus in the Harlingen CISD received a STaR Chart summary for the 2009-2010 school year. The summary evaluated the campus across 4 key areas related to technology integration on a scale of 1 to 4. Key Area I on Teaching and Learning and Key Area II on Educator Preparation and Development both received scores of 13, classifying them as at the "Developing Tech" level. Key Area III on Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support received a score of 17, classified as "Advanced Tech". Key Area IV on Infrastructure for Technology received the highest score of 18, also classified as "Advanced Tech". The principal at the time was Manuel Olivo.
Campus2006chart
This document summarizes a Texas Campus STaR Chart for Elizabeth Smith Elementary School for the 2008-2009 school year. It evaluates the school across four key areas related to educational technology on a scale of 1 to 4. Elizabeth Smith Elementary scored in the "Advanced Tech" range of 3 for all four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. The chart provides further breakdowns of sub-categories within each key area, showing scores ranging from 2 to 4.
2007data
This document summarizes a Texas Campus STaR Chart for Elizabeth Smith Elementary School for the 2006-2007 school year. It evaluates the school across four key areas related to educational technology on a scale of 1 to 4. Key Area III on Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support received the highest rating of 16, classifying it as "Advanced Tech". The other three key areas - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, and Infrastructure for Technology - received ratings between 11-13 and were classified as "Developing Tech". The chart provides an overview of how the school was performing with educational technology integration based on different criteria within each key area.
2008data
This document summarizes a campus STaR Chart for Elizabeth Smith Elementary School for the 2007-2008 school year. It shows ratings from 1 to 4 in different key areas related to technology use, with higher numbers indicating more advanced technology. The key areas included Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership and Support, and Infrastructure. Elizabeth Smith Elementary received ratings of Developing Tech in Teaching and Learning, Leadership and Support, and Infrastructure, but received a rating of Advanced Tech in Educator Preparation and Development. The chart provides an overview of the school's technology implementation and capabilities.
Campus2006chart
Woodson Middle School in Houston ISD had advanced technology in teaching and learning and leadership/administration/instructional support, with total scores of 16 and 15 respectively. The school had developing technology in educator preparation and development, with a score of 12. Infrastructure for technology was the school's strongest area, with a score of 20, classified as advanced.
S Ta R Chart 2007 2008 Hyperlink Sheet
Woodson Middle School in 2007-2008 had developing technology in teaching and learning and infrastructure, with early technology in educator preparation and advanced technology in leadership, administration, and instructional support. The school scored 12 out of 16 in teaching and learning, 8 out of 16 in educator preparation, 16 out of 16 in leadership and support, and 14 out of 16 in infrastructure. Principal Linda Whitley aimed to improve technology integration across key areas.
S Ta R Chart 2008 2009
Woodson Middle School in Houston ISD had a Developing Tech rating across all key areas in the 2008-2009 school year according to the STaR Chart summary. The summary shows the school scored 12 points in Key Areas I, II, and III related to Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, and Leadership which is the Developing Tech range of 7 to 15 points. It also scored 11 points in Key Area IV on Infrastructure which is also in the Developing Tech range. The principal at the time was Linda Whitley who aimed to advance the school's technology integration in core subjects and professional development.
Jefferson elementary
Jefferson Elementary's Texas STaR Chart shows a comparison of their technology ratings over a 3 year period from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012. Across the 4 key areas of Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure, the school improved many of their ratings from "Developing" to "Advanced" over this time frame. By 2011-2012, Jefferson Elementary had achieved "Advanced" or "Target" ratings in most areas, showing progress in effectively integrating technology at the school.
Jefferson elementary
The document shows Jefferson Elementary's Texas STaR Chart ratings for the key areas of Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership, Administration, & Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology over a 3 year period from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012. The chart indicates the school's progress in improving its technology implementation in many areas, with higher ratings in most areas in later years compared to earlier years. Overall, the totals for each key area show the school improving its technology integration according to the STaR Chart criteria over this three year time span.
Update on s ta r chart
This document outlines the components and scores of a school's technology plan in four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It finds that Teaching and Learning and Educator Preparation & Development scored the lowest, indicating a developing level of technology integration, while Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support and Infrastructure for Technology scored higher, signifying advanced and target levels. To improve, it recommends that teachers learn to better utilize existing technology resources and embrace incorporating technology like cellphones into instruction.
Texas S Ta R Chart
This document discusses the 2008-2009 Texas Campus STaR data for Cactus Ranch Elementary. It summarizes the school's scores in the four components of the STaR Chart: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. While scores have increased each year since 2006-2007, Educator Preparation remains an area of weakness. The school aims to increase all low scores and continue improving technology integration.
Jefferson elementary3
Jefferson Elementary saw improvements in its use of technology for teaching and learning from 2009-2012 according to its Texas STaR Chart. Key areas like teaching and learning and leadership went from early to advanced technology levels. Infrastructure for technology was consistently at an advanced level. Overall, the school increased its totals in the STaR chart over this three year period, showing progress in integrating educational technology.
Jefferson elementary2
Jefferson Elementary saw improvements across all key areas of technology integration from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012 according to their Texas STaR Chart. Teaching and learning and leadership/support achieved advanced technology status by 2011-2012, while educator preparation/development reached developing technology. Infrastructure remained at an advanced level throughout.
TX STaR Plan 2012
The document discusses meeting the technological needs of today's students through closing the gap between available technologies and access to them for learning purposes. It emphasizes teachers acting as facilitators for technology integration and enhancing the student to computer ratio to allow for more learning with technology. The document also includes a chart assessing a school district's progress in key technology areas like classroom use patterns, instructional design, content connections, and student mastery of technology applications.
Texas STaR Plan
The document discusses meeting the technological needs of today's students through closing the gap between available technologies and access to them for teachers and students. It emphasizes teachers acting as facilitators for learning with technology and ensuring adequate student-to-computer ratios to allow for technology integration and enhanced learning through technology applications. The document also includes a chart assessing a school district's progress in key areas of teaching and learning with technology.
Texas STaR Plan1
The document discusses meeting the technological needs of students by closing the gap between available technologies and access to them in schools. It notes that teachers need to act as facilitators for integrating technology into learning, with an emphasis on using technology to enhance learning rather than just having access to it. The document also references a school technology plan showing goals around instructional technology use, content connections, applications used, and online learning.
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
This presentation is of Arp High School's STaR Chart data in conjunction with Texas technology plan. Enjoy!
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt
This document summarizes Tabasco Elementary School's annual STaR Chart information for technology integration. It shows the school's ratings over three years in four key areas: I) Teaching & Learning II) Educator Preparation & Development III) Leadership & Instructional Support and IV) Infrastructure & Technology. For 2009-2010, the school was rated as "Developing Tech" in areas I, II, and IV, and "Advanced Tech" in area III. The conclusion notes areas for improvement, such as increasing classroom technology and teacher professional development, to advance the school's ratings.
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt[1]
This document summarizes Tabasco Elementary School's annual STaR Chart information which evaluates the school's use of technology across four key areas: I) Teaching & Learning II) Educator Preparation & Development III) Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support IV) Infrastructure & Technology. According to the 2009-2010 summary, the school was rated as "Developing Tech" in areas I, II, and IV, and "Advanced Tech" in area III. The conclusion notes the need to increase technology use in teaching, lower the student-computer ratio, and provide additional professional development for teachers.
Wiki2
There are several options to become a programmer through either university or TAFE programs. TAFE offers a Diploma of Information Technology (Software Development) which requires completion of Certificate III and IV courses first. Universities like Curtin, ECU, and Murdoch offer 3-year Computer Science degrees, requiring a minimum TER score and English, with some also requiring Mathematics. These programs can be completed full-time or part-time.
Action Plan For Technology
- Staff at Barrientes Middle School will complete the STaR Chart and SEDTA survey to assess technology proficiency levels and will be expected to show growth.
- Teachers will create and model technology-integrated lessons for their subjects and help train other teachers on the use of technology.
- Open access computer labs will be used by 6th-8th grade students across content areas to create documents, spreadsheets and presentations.
- Teachers will be trained on how to use Edusoft software to disaggregate test data and analyze student and class performance to improve instruction.
- The technology team and staff will receive advanced technology training throughout the year and summer to increase technology knowledge and proficiency with the goal
Sta R Chart
This document outlines a school technology readiness chart (StaR Chart) that assesses progress across four key areas: 1) Teaching and Learning, 2) Educator Preparation and Development, 3) Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and 4) Infrastructure for Technology. Each key area contains several indicators that are rated on a scale from 1 to 5. The chart identifies strengths and areas of concern within each key area to guide further technology planning and improvements.
Planning correct
The document outlines a plan for a new magazine called "LIFESTYLE NYC" targeted towards teenagers and young adults aged 17-26 in New York City. The monthly magazine will focus on current events, entertainment, fashion, and food/drink and will have a bold, sophisticated design using black, white, and red colors. As the target audience will be students, the magazine will be free.
MOTIVACION y LIDERAZGO: estimular el aporte del equipo
El documento argumenta que los trabajadores se motivan cuando pueden hacer una contribución utilizando su inteligencia práctica y creatividad. Aunque las órdenes de los jefes no siempre coinciden con la realidad del trabajo, los trabajadores a menudo encuentran formas ingeniosas de cumplir los objetivos. Los jefes deberían crear un diálogo para evaluar alternativas propuestas por los empleados en lugar de simplemente ordenar tareas, lo que genera compromiso y placer en el trabajo. La felicidad laboral depende de poder contrib
PRAYER
This document outlines 3 different modes: Working Mode which is for focusing on tasks, Happy Mode which is likely for socializing and relaxing, and Breaktime Mode which provides time away from work duties.
For booking plots in sky aangan 4
A document provides contact information for booking plots in Sky Aangan, listing Baburaj as the Sales Manager and his phone number +91 987 363 4854 for making inquiries or reservations.
More Related Content
What's hot
Jefferson elementary
Jefferson Elementary's Texas STaR Chart shows a comparison of their technology ratings over a 3 year period from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012. Across the 4 key areas of Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure, the school improved many of their ratings from "Developing" to "Advanced" over this time frame. By 2011-2012, Jefferson Elementary had achieved "Advanced" or "Target" ratings in most areas, showing progress in effectively integrating technology at the school.
Jefferson elementary
The document shows Jefferson Elementary's Texas STaR Chart ratings for the key areas of Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership, Administration, & Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology over a 3 year period from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012. The chart indicates the school's progress in improving its technology implementation in many areas, with higher ratings in most areas in later years compared to earlier years. Overall, the totals for each key area show the school improving its technology integration according to the STaR Chart criteria over this three year time span.
Update on s ta r chart
This document outlines the components and scores of a school's technology plan in four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It finds that Teaching and Learning and Educator Preparation & Development scored the lowest, indicating a developing level of technology integration, while Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support and Infrastructure for Technology scored higher, signifying advanced and target levels. To improve, it recommends that teachers learn to better utilize existing technology resources and embrace incorporating technology like cellphones into instruction.
Texas S Ta R Chart
This document discusses the 2008-2009 Texas Campus STaR data for Cactus Ranch Elementary. It summarizes the school's scores in the four components of the STaR Chart: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. While scores have increased each year since 2006-2007, Educator Preparation remains an area of weakness. The school aims to increase all low scores and continue improving technology integration.
Jefferson elementary3
Jefferson Elementary saw improvements in its use of technology for teaching and learning from 2009-2012 according to its Texas STaR Chart. Key areas like teaching and learning and leadership went from early to advanced technology levels. Infrastructure for technology was consistently at an advanced level. Overall, the school increased its totals in the STaR chart over this three year period, showing progress in integrating educational technology.
Jefferson elementary2
Jefferson Elementary saw improvements across all key areas of technology integration from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012 according to their Texas STaR Chart. Teaching and learning and leadership/support achieved advanced technology status by 2011-2012, while educator preparation/development reached developing technology. Infrastructure remained at an advanced level throughout.
TX STaR Plan 2012
The document discusses meeting the technological needs of today's students through closing the gap between available technologies and access to them for learning purposes. It emphasizes teachers acting as facilitators for technology integration and enhancing the student to computer ratio to allow for more learning with technology. The document also includes a chart assessing a school district's progress in key technology areas like classroom use patterns, instructional design, content connections, and student mastery of technology applications.
Texas STaR Plan
The document discusses meeting the technological needs of today's students through closing the gap between available technologies and access to them for teachers and students. It emphasizes teachers acting as facilitators for learning with technology and ensuring adequate student-to-computer ratios to allow for technology integration and enhanced learning through technology applications. The document also includes a chart assessing a school district's progress in key areas of teaching and learning with technology.
Texas STaR Plan1
The document discusses meeting the technological needs of students by closing the gap between available technologies and access to them in schools. It notes that teachers need to act as facilitators for integrating technology into learning, with an emphasis on using technology to enhance learning rather than just having access to it. The document also references a school technology plan showing goals around instructional technology use, content connections, applications used, and online learning.
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
This presentation is of Arp High School's STaR Chart data in conjunction with Texas technology plan. Enjoy!
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt
This document summarizes Tabasco Elementary School's annual STaR Chart information for technology integration. It shows the school's ratings over three years in four key areas: I) Teaching & Learning II) Educator Preparation & Development III) Leadership & Instructional Support and IV) Infrastructure & Technology. For 2009-2010, the school was rated as "Developing Tech" in areas I, II, and IV, and "Advanced Tech" in area III. The conclusion notes areas for improvement, such as increasing classroom technology and teacher professional development, to advance the school's ratings.
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt[1]
This document summarizes Tabasco Elementary School's annual STaR Chart information which evaluates the school's use of technology across four key areas: I) Teaching & Learning II) Educator Preparation & Development III) Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support IV) Infrastructure & Technology. According to the 2009-2010 summary, the school was rated as "Developing Tech" in areas I, II, and IV, and "Advanced Tech" in area III. The conclusion notes the need to increase technology use in teaching, lower the student-computer ratio, and provide additional professional development for teachers.
Wiki2
There are several options to become a programmer through either university or TAFE programs. TAFE offers a Diploma of Information Technology (Software Development) which requires completion of Certificate III and IV courses first. Universities like Curtin, ECU, and Murdoch offer 3-year Computer Science degrees, requiring a minimum TER score and English, with some also requiring Mathematics. These programs can be completed full-time or part-time.
Action Plan For Technology
- Staff at Barrientes Middle School will complete the STaR Chart and SEDTA survey to assess technology proficiency levels and will be expected to show growth.
- Teachers will create and model technology-integrated lessons for their subjects and help train other teachers on the use of technology.
- Open access computer labs will be used by 6th-8th grade students across content areas to create documents, spreadsheets and presentations.
- Teachers will be trained on how to use Edusoft software to disaggregate test data and analyze student and class performance to improve instruction.
- The technology team and staff will receive advanced technology training throughout the year and summer to increase technology knowledge and proficiency with the goal
Sta R Chart
This document outlines a school technology readiness chart (StaR Chart) that assesses progress across four key areas: 1) Teaching and Learning, 2) Educator Preparation and Development, 3) Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and 4) Infrastructure for Technology. Each key area contains several indicators that are rated on a scale from 1 to 5. The chart identifies strengths and areas of concern within each key area to guide further technology planning and improvements.
What's hot (15)
Viewers also liked
Planning correct
The document outlines a plan for a new magazine called "LIFESTYLE NYC" targeted towards teenagers and young adults aged 17-26 in New York City. The monthly magazine will focus on current events, entertainment, fashion, and food/drink and will have a bold, sophisticated design using black, white, and red colors. As the target audience will be students, the magazine will be free.
MOTIVACION y LIDERAZGO: estimular el aporte del equipo
El documento argumenta que los trabajadores se motivan cuando pueden hacer una contribución utilizando su inteligencia práctica y creatividad. Aunque las órdenes de los jefes no siempre coinciden con la realidad del trabajo, los trabajadores a menudo encuentran formas ingeniosas de cumplir los objetivos. Los jefes deberían crear un diálogo para evaluar alternativas propuestas por los empleados en lugar de simplemente ordenar tareas, lo que genera compromiso y placer en el trabajo. La felicidad laboral depende de poder contrib
PRAYER
This document outlines 3 different modes: Working Mode which is for focusing on tasks, Happy Mode which is likely for socializing and relaxing, and Breaktime Mode which provides time away from work duties.
For booking plots in sky aangan 4
A document provides contact information for booking plots in Sky Aangan, listing Baburaj as the Sales Manager and his phone number +91 987 363 4854 for making inquiries or reservations.
CALENDÁRIO DAS PROVAS DE EQUIVALÊNCIA À FREQUÊNCIA – 3º CICLO
CALENDÁRIO DAS PROVAS DE EQUIVALÊNCIA À FREQUÊNCIA – 3º CICLO -
9º ANO – Ano Letivo de 2013/2014 – 1ª Fase (junho)
Summer Stewardship
This document provides tips for staying connected to one's faith community while on vacation, such as praying daily, attending mass when possible, and serving others through small acts of kindness. It also encourages using an online donation system so that the parish can still be supported even when away.
Sítio marc 9
Excelente sítio à venda em Santa Cruz - RN, às margens do açude. Área espaçosa, fértil e um rico pomar. Maiores detalhes pelo (84) 9901-7248 e pelo e-mail gcarsantos@gmail.com
Lineas de producción de software
Este documento describe los aspectos conceptuales y organizacionales de las líneas de producción de software. Explica que la reutilización de software es el proceso de crear sistemas a partir de software existente en lugar de desarrollo desde cero. Un componente es una pieza de software reutilizable que ofrece servicios a través de interfaces bien definidas. Los aspectos organizacionales involucran la aplicación de prácticas de gestión, mientras que los aspectos conceptuales incluyen tres modelos comunes para el desarrollo de software basado en componentes y líneas de
Un sobre
El documento describe cómo decorar y recortar un sobre para desarrollar destrezas manuales. Se le pide al estudiante que decore un sobre, luego lo recorte y lo pliegue para completar un proyecto de arte que mejora la habilidad manual.
Una postura aleatoria de rotulos ciudad real
El documento describe las ventajas de la impresión gráfica digital, incluyendo que es rápida, permite imprimir pequeñas cantidades de materiales de alta calidad como tarjetas de visita, catálogos y carteles grandes. También explica cómo las fotos digitales pueden convertirse en carteles grandes y aplicarse a exhibiciones, eventos y decoración del hogar o de la oficina. Además, la impresión sobre lienzo puede usarse como arte decorativo o en la comercialización para agregar un factor adicional a los materiales
Maximize your Cloud ROI with Cirrus Insight
You've invested in Salesforce and Google Apps now maximize your ROI by integrating the two with Cirrus Insight.
Lo que he aprendido estas 3 semanas de informática
En las últimas 3 semanas de clases de informática, los estudiantes aprendieron sobre las partes internas y externas de una computadora, incluyendo el hardware, software, tarjeta madre, microprocesador y sistema operativo. También aprendieron sobre dispositivos de entrada y salida, redes, y las interfaces básicas de Windows y Word.
Búsqueda avanzada
La planta es la caña de las Indias (Canna). Puede crecer hasta casi 2 metros de altura y tiene hermosas flores en tonos rojos, amarillos u anaranjados. Sus rizomas se usan como alimento, ya que pueden cocinarse como papas o usarse para hacer harina y bizcochos. También tiene usos medicinales como diurético.
Hipervinculo clase selecionada claudia c.
Este documento presenta la planificación de una clase de lenguaje y comunicación cuyo objetivo es describir y comparar los personajes de un texto. La clase analizará el video "La niña de la calavera" identificando las características físicas y psicológicas de los personajes Mallen y su madrastra, así como sus acciones y actitudes. Los estudiantes compararán a los personajes usando una guía y luego dramatizarán uno de ellos, para finalmente reflexionar sobre las emociones representadas.
Viewers also liked (19)
MOTIVACION y LIDERAZGO: estimular el aporte del equipo
MOTIVACION y LIDERAZGO: estimular el aporte del equipo
CALENDÁRIO DAS PROVAS DE EQUIVALÊNCIA À FREQUÊNCIA – 3º CICLO
CALENDÁRIO DAS PROVAS DE EQUIVALÊNCIA À FREQUÊNCIA – 3º CICLO
Lo que he aprendido estas 3 semanas de informática
Lo que he aprendido estas 3 semanas de informática
Similar to Jefferson star chart 2010 2011
Texas S Ta R Chart
This document discusses a school's Texas Campus STaR assessment results. It includes a summary of the school's scores on the four components of the STaR Chart for the 2008-2009 school year. The school scored well in most areas but lower in educator professional development. The summary identifies developing areas to focus on improving, such as increasing educator training and the number of students per computer. It concludes by noting the school will review next year's STaR Chart data.
Update on STAAR chart
This document outlines the components and scores of a school's technology plan in four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It finds that Teaching and Learning and Educator Preparation & Development scored the lowest, indicating a developing level of technology integration, while Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support and Infrastructure for Technology scored higher, signifying advanced and target levels. It concludes that while the necessary hardware and administrative support are in place, teachers need to learn how to better utilize the existing technology, including embracing the use of cellphones in the classroom.
Texas s ta r chart ppt.
The Texas STaR Chart is an online self-assessment tool that allows schools to evaluate their technology use, readiness, and infrastructure based on the state's Long-Range Plan for Technology. The chart assesses schools across four key areas - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership/Support, and Infrastructure. It places schools into one of four levels of progress and identifies strengths and weaknesses across six focus areas in each key area. The results can help with technology planning, budgeting, and measuring progress towards state and federal technology goals.
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
This document discusses a school's use of the STaR Chart, a rubric used in Texas to assess schools' technology integration. It received Advanced Tech ratings in Teaching/Learning and Educator Development, and Target Tech in Leadership/Support. To improve, it will focus on technology trainings and becoming Target Tech across all areas. The STaR Chart helps schools develop students' technology skills and monitor effective integration to meet state and federal requirements.
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
This document discusses a school's use of the STaR Chart, a rubric used in Texas to assess schools' technology integration. It received Advanced Tech ratings in Teaching/Learning and Educator Development, and Target Tech in Leadership/Support. It aims to help the school improve integration by identifying strengths/weaknesses and guiding technology planning, training, and budgeting to work towards becoming Target Tech across all areas.
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
This document discusses a school's use of the STaR Chart, a rubric used in Texas to assess schools' technology integration. It received Advanced Tech ratings in Teaching/Learning and Educator Development, and Target Tech in Leadership/Support. To improve, it will focus on technology trainings and becoming Target Tech across all areas. The STaR Chart helps schools develop students' technology skills and monitor effective integration to meet state and federal requirements.
Jefferson elementary2
Jefferson Elementary saw improvements across all key areas of technology integration from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012 according to their Texas STaR Chart. Teaching and learning and leadership/support achieved advanced technology status by 2011-2012, while educator preparation/development reached developing technology. Infrastructure remained at an advanced level throughout.
S Ta R Chart Presentation 1.2
The document provides information about the Texas Campus STaR Chart which is a tool used to evaluate the progress of technology integration at schools according to the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology. It summarizes the results of Lorenzo De Zavala Elementary's STaR Chart evaluation and identifies goals for the school to reach the highest "Target Tech" classification, including increasing collaborative technology use among teachers and students and ensuring administrator support for technology integration.
S ta r chart data
Canyon Ridge Elementary School assessed their technology use across four key areas in 2009-2010 using the Texas STaR Chart. They scored highest in Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support. They have opportunities to improve in Online Learning, Models of Professional Development for teachers, and Technical Support. Canyon Ridge Elementary is working to enhance how they use technology for student learning and school events.
S Ta R Chart
The document summarizes Liberty Elementary School's STaR Chart ratings for the 2008-2009 school year. The STaR Chart rates schools in 4 key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Liberty received ratings of "Developing Tech" in Teaching/Learning and Educator Prep, and "Advanced Tech" in Leadership/Admin and Infrastructure. The summary discusses what these ratings mean for technology use at Liberty and sets goals for future improvement, such as fully integrating technology into the curriculum and providing on-demand student access.
S Ta R Chart
The document summarizes Liberty Elementary School's STaR Chart ratings for the 2008-2009 school year. The STaR Chart rates schools in 4 key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Liberty received ratings of "Developing Tech" in Teaching/Learning and Educator Prep, and "Advanced Tech" in Leadership/Admin and Infrastructure. The summary discusses what these ratings mean for technology use at Liberty and sets goals for future improvement, such as fully integrating technology into the curriculum and providing on-demand student access.
S Ta R Chart
The document summarizes Liberty Elementary School's STaR Chart ratings for the 2008-2009 school year. The STaR Chart rates schools in 4 key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Liberty received ratings of "Developing Tech" in Teaching/Learning and Educator Prep, and "Advanced Tech" in Leadership/Admin and Infrastructure. The summary discusses what these ratings mean for technology use at Liberty and sets goals for future improvement, such as fully integrating technology into the curriculum and providing on-demand student access.
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt[1]
This document summarizes Tabasco Elementary School's annual STaR Chart information which evaluates the school's use of technology across four key areas: 1) Teaching & Learning 2) Educator Preparation & Development 3) Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support 4) Infrastructure & Technology. According to the 2009-2010 summary, the school was rated as "Developing Tech" in areas 1, 2, and 4, and "Advanced Tech" in area 3. The conclusion notes the need to increase technology use in teaching and lower the student-computer ratio, while continuing professional development for teachers.
Texas Campus Star Chart
E. Rodriguez presented on the Texas Campus Star Chart, which is a tool for schools to self-assess their technology readiness in four key areas. The presentation included an overview of the Star Chart, a summary of the campus's scores in each area which were all in the "Developing Tech. Stage", and a conclusion that the campus will focus on improving their weakest area.
Texas Campus Star Chart2
E. Rodriguez presented on the Texas Campus Star Chart, which is used to assess and plan for technology readiness across four key areas. At the campus summarized, each of the four areas - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology - scored in the "Developing Tech. Stage." The presentation concluded that the campus must identify the most urgent area to improve and work towards advancing that area's score by year's end.
Te xas star chart
This document outlines a chart for assessing a school's use of technology across six key areas: 1) Teaching and learning patterns, content connections, and student mastery; 2) Educator preparation, development models, and online learning support; 3) Leadership vision, planning, support, communication, budget, and online support; 4) Infrastructure including student-computer ratios, internet access, technology, and network/distance learning support. Schools are classified from 1-4 based on their stage of technology integration across these key areas.
Texas star chart Glenn
The STaR Chart measures Summit High School's use of technology across four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Administration Support, and Infrastructure. Summit High School scored a 2 or 3 in each area, with their highest scores being in Educator Preparation and Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support. The document identifies weaknesses in Teaching and Learning Content Area Connections and strengths in Internet Access Connectivity Speed that Summit High School wants to improve upon by providing more opportunities for online professional development and resources for teachers to improve technology use.
5352 powerpoint
The document summarizes the Rockdale Tigers Campus STaR Chart for 2010. It identifies four key areas - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparations and Development, Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. For each area, it lists subcategories and provides the campus' STaR Chart totals, which were 13 for each key area, indicating a developing level of technology. It concludes that the three main areas for improvement are staff development opportunities, providing more meaningful technology experiences for students, and using new technologies like cell phones for classroom projects.
Te xas star chart 2
The document is a STAR chart that evaluates a Texas school campus's use of technology across four key areas in 2009-2010: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership/administration/instructional support, and infrastructure for technology. In each area, the campus scored between 13-14 points, indicating it was at the "developing technology" level for that year. The summary provides a high-level overview of the document's purpose and main conclusions in 3 sentences.
Te xas star chart 2
The document is a STAR chart that evaluates a Texas school campus's use of technology across four key areas in 2009-2010: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership/administration/instructional support, and infrastructure for technology. In each area, the campus scored between 13-14 points, indicating it was at the "developing technology" level for that year. The summary provides a high-level overview of the document's purpose and main conclusions in 3 sentences.
Similar to Jefferson star chart 2010 2011 (20)
More from secretsvicky
C qlocal HCISD AUP
The document outlines Harlingen Consolidated Independent School District's policies regarding electronic communication and data management. It discusses providing access to electronic resources for instructional and administrative purposes. It also addresses acceptable use, internet safety, filtering, monitoring use, intellectual property rights, and disclaimer of liability. The policies are aimed at controlling access to inappropriate online content, ensuring student safety, preventing unauthorized access, and restricting disclosure of private student information.
Can drive
Jefferson Elementary is holding a canned food drive to collect non-perishable donations for victims of Hurricane Sandy, with donations to be collected from students by their teachers on November 27, 2012.
10 135 master-technology_teacher_cert
The document describes the Master Technology Teacher certification program offered online through The University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College. The certification is approved by the State Board for Educator Certification. The program prepares educators to provide technology leadership, develop technology-enriched instruction, and serve as a resource for integrating technology. It consists of four required online courses that fit into the university's educational technology master's degree. Upon completing the courses and exams, candidates are qualified to take the Master Technology Teacher certification exam.
Digital classroom application cadre i
The teacher envisions a digital classroom where online resources and curricula are used alongside technology like tablets, laptops, and an interactive whiteboard. This would allow students independent practice with educational applications and receive immediate feedback instead of traditional paper methods. The goal is to prepare students for problem solving using technology and expose them early so they can apply skills through projects as they continue their education.
Digital classroom application
My classroom could serve as a model for digital learning in HCISD by providing ideas for applying basic technology and teaching vocabulary with computer skills for early childhood. I would like to show how I incorporate technology and web tools to help people see that technology belongs in early childhood classrooms to build skills for 21st century learners, although there are limited opportunities now for students to create their own projects, exposure inspires creativity and curiosity.
Jefferson grade k_unitexploring space
The document outlines a "Solar System Menu" activity with options for learning about the solar system, including appetizers where students name the planets in order, entrée where they draw or write about a planet, side dishes with writing or drawing tasks about the sun and rotation, and an optional dessert of creating a model of the Milky Way galaxy.
Hurricane kwl
Hurricanes are large, rotating storms that form over warm ocean waters and move toward land. They have very strong winds that can exceed 155 miles per hour and produce heavy rains sometimes causing inland flooding. Hurricanes can cause severe damage to homes and infrastructure due to their high winds and coastal storm surges.
Names for hurricane season
This document provides instructions to create a list of names for the upcoming hurricane season by listing letters A through W, with the note to alternate men's and women's names.
Murder mystery
Murder Mystery
- Forensic investigators found evidence in Simon P. Ano's bedroom including cell phones, medicine bottles, and a letter.
- The cell phone belonged to Ima Bimbeaux, Mr. Ano's nurse. Medicine bottles indicated pills were missing and improperly taken.
- Fingerprints on the letter were from Golda Digger (Mr. Ano's wife), Haff Note (his musical partner), and Lyan D. Vios (his business partner who was having an affair with Golda).
- Profiles of the individuals connected to the evidence point to their relationships with Mr. Ano and possible motives. All evidence points to the culprit but the summary does not
Flaghouse letter
Flaghouse is unable to ship equipment ordered by Simon P. Ano on time due to a shipment delay from the UK. To compensate, Flaghouse is reducing the price of the equipment from $5,895 to $4,895 and will cover all freight costs to deliver the equipment to Mr. Ano. Flaghouse requests that Mr. Ano reply to confirm he still wants to complete the sale under the new terms.
Librarian email
Kathy Carter emailed Simon P. Ano with information about an article he had requested from TES Magazine from July 2007 about a man named David Jackson. She provided the titles and sources for two additional related articles that may help Simon with his research. Kathy offered her assistance if Simon needed help obtaining copies of the articles and wished him good luck.
Copyrightvictorialopezrevisedforch3 6
This document provides an overview of copyright including fair use, the public domain, content on the web, the TEACH Act for digital distance learning, and getting permission. It discusses building on others' creative works, copyright infringement penalties up to $150,000 per act, and paring down student works when digitizing. The Copyright Crash Course presents information on analog vs digital copyright, mass digitization, liability for content online, and using the Copyright Clearance Center or contacting owners for written permission.
Copyrightvictorialopezrevisedforch1&2
This document provides an overview of copyright including fair use, the public domain, content on the web, and getting permission to use copyrighted works. It discusses key aspects of copyright such as only using small portions of others' works creatively under fair use, digitizing works requires getting permission, and the TEACH Act provides additional rights for educators to display works in class. It also lists penalties for copyright infringement and resources for obtaining copyright permission.
Copyright
This document provides an overview of key copyright concepts including fair use, the public domain, obtaining permission, and digital content on the web. It discusses how copyright automatically protects original works without requiring publication or notice. Fair use allows limited use of copyrighted works for purposes like teaching and incorporates works into new creations. The TEACH Act expanded fair use for digital distance learning. Obtaining permission is needed when use exceeds fair use. The document outlines factors considered for fair use and penalties for infringement. It provides resources for understanding copyright concepts.
More from secretsvicky (16)
Jefferson star chart 2010 2011
- 1. Texas Campus STaR Chart Summary 1 = Early Tech 2 = Developing Tech 3 = Advanced Tech 4 = Target Tech Campus (CD#): Jefferson El (031903108) School Yr: 2010-2011 District: Harlingen Cisd Principal: Manuel Olivo Email: manuel.olivo@hcisd.org Key Area I: Teaching and Learning TL1 TL2 TL3 TL4 TL5 TL6 Total Patterns of Frequency/ Content Area Techology Student Online Learning Total Classroom Use Design of Connections Applications Mastery of Instructional (TA) TEKS Technology Setting Implemention Applications 3 3 3 3 2 2 16 Key Area II: Educator Preparation and Development EP1 EP2 EP3 EP4 EP5 EP6 Total Professional Models of Capabilities of Access to Levels of Professional Total Development Professional Educators Professional Understanding Development Experiences Development Development and Patterns of for Online Use Learning 3 2 3 2 3 2 15 Key Area III: Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 Total Leadership and Planning Instructional Communication Budget Leadership and Total Vision Support and Support for Collaboration Online Learning 3 3 3 3 3 3 18 Key Area IV: Infrastructure for Technology INF1 INF2 INF3 INF4 INF5 INF6 Total Students per Internet Access Other Technical Local Area Distance Total Computers Connectivity Classroom Support Network Wide Learning Speed Technology Area Network Capacity 3 4 3 3 3 3 19 KEY AREA SUMMARY Key Area Key Area Total Key Area STaR Classification I. Teaching and Learning 16 Advanced Tech II. Educator Preparation and Development 15 Advanced Tech III. LeaderShip, Admin., Instructional Support 18 Advanced Tech IV. Infrastructure for Technology 19 Advanced Tech Completed Date: 11/23/2010 Printed: 2/4/2013 8:01 PM