Information on IPSA 2017 Conference "Looking Beyond the Crisis: Impact of Mass Migrations on the Local, Regional, National and EU Governance", 11-14 May 2017, Dubrovnik, Croatia
Information on IPSA 2017 Conference "Looking Beyond the Crisis: Impact of Mass Migrations on the Local, Regional, National and EU Governance", 11-14 May 2017, Dubrovnik, Croatia
This document announces an international conference on decentralization policies to be held from May 7-10, 2015 in Dubrovnik, Croatia. The conference is organized by several Croatian and international organizations and will explore recent decentralization reforms, including territorial restructuring, the democratizing effects of decentralization, and evaluations of current reforms. Accepted papers will be considered for publication in an international journal. The deadline for abstract submissions is January 31, 2015. The conference will take place at the Centre for Advanced Academic Studies in Dubrovnik and accommodation will be provided to invited speakers.
Tom Christensen - "The Norwegian Central Administrative System: Development F...Institut za javnu upravu
The Norwegian central administrative system has developed gradually over time. Key developments include the establishment of ministries in 1814 and the introduction of agencies in the 1850s based on Swedish and Danish models. Since 1945, the system has grown significantly with increased specialization and more regulatory agencies. Reforms since the 1980s have aimed for more efficiency through structural changes, but also increased coordination. Maintaining political control while the system is decentralized and balancing autonomy with coordination are ongoing challenges. Typical Norwegian features include shared norms between political and administrative leaders, modified hierarchies, and autonomy for agencies within set goals.
Tom Christensen - "Comparative Public Sector Reforms - Perspectives and Exper...Institut za javnu upravu
This document discusses perspectives on comparative public sector reform. It covers the instrumental perspective that sees reform as achievable through reorganization, the cultural perspective that reform is an evolutionary process, and the myth perspective where reforms spread due to norms. New Public Management aimed for efficiency but faced challenges around political control and coordination. Post-NPM reforms emphasize strengthening central control and coordination in response to problems with NPM and a more insecure world. Future government may blend old, NPM, and post-NPM approaches, with both potential positive and negative effects.
This document announces an international conference on decentralization policies to be held from May 7-10, 2015 in Dubrovnik, Croatia. The conference is organized by several Croatian and international organizations and will explore recent decentralization reforms, including territorial restructuring, the democratizing effects of decentralization, and evaluations of current reforms. Accepted papers will be considered for publication in an international journal. The deadline for abstract submissions is January 31, 2015. The conference will take place at the Centre for Advanced Academic Studies in Dubrovnik and accommodation will be provided to invited speakers.
Tom Christensen - "The Norwegian Central Administrative System: Development F...Institut za javnu upravu
The Norwegian central administrative system has developed gradually over time. Key developments include the establishment of ministries in 1814 and the introduction of agencies in the 1850s based on Swedish and Danish models. Since 1945, the system has grown significantly with increased specialization and more regulatory agencies. Reforms since the 1980s have aimed for more efficiency through structural changes, but also increased coordination. Maintaining political control while the system is decentralized and balancing autonomy with coordination are ongoing challenges. Typical Norwegian features include shared norms between political and administrative leaders, modified hierarchies, and autonomy for agencies within set goals.
Tom Christensen - "Comparative Public Sector Reforms - Perspectives and Exper...Institut za javnu upravu
This document discusses perspectives on comparative public sector reform. It covers the instrumental perspective that sees reform as achievable through reorganization, the cultural perspective that reform is an evolutionary process, and the myth perspective where reforms spread due to norms. New Public Management aimed for efficiency but faced challenges around political control and coordination. Post-NPM reforms emphasize strengthening central control and coordination in response to problems with NPM and a more insecure world. Future government may blend old, NPM, and post-NPM approaches, with both potential positive and negative effects.
2. HRVATSKA – EU - PROMJENE
prilagodba EU institucijama
tradicionalna uloga države
NPM - good governance
PPP
regionalna politika
građani u fokusu
decentralizacija
3. CILJEVI
REGIONALNE POLITIKE
EU fondovi
ubrzani razvoj regija
strateško planiranje
DECENTRALIZACIJE
supsidijarnost
građani u fokusu
policy capacitity
djelotvornost
povjerenje
4. KAKO ?
tko je u tome najbolji?
Danska
što su napravili?
novi koncept lokalne države
Ciljevi:
- proširiti opseg i broj funkcija
- jačanje policy kapaciteta
- jačanje fiskalnog i upravljačkog kapaciteta
- građani u fokusu
- supsidijarnost
5. DANSKI MODEL
REGIJE
- 800.000 tis. st / regiji (EU kriterij)
LOKALNE JEDINICE
- 30.000 st. / jedinici
REZULTAT
- najbolja javna uprava
- najsretniji građani
6. TERITORIJALNI USTROJ
PODRUČNA RAZINA
NUTS II 3 regije (statističke)
NUTS III 20 + 1 županija
20 županija
Grad Zagreb
10. NOVI TERITORIJALNI USTROJ
NUTS II 5 regija
1. Grad Zagreb* – 807.149 st /654 km2
2. Središnja Hrvatska* - 842.474 st / 10.556
km2
3. Slavonija – 925.935 st / 12.465 km2
4. Gorsko-primorska – 806.289 st / 19.823
km2
5. Dalmacija – 908.765 st / 12.943 km2
11. TERITORIJALNI USTROJ
1. Grad Zagreb
2. Središnja Hrvatska: Zagrebačka, Krapinsko-
zagorska, Varaždinska, Međimurska, Bjelovarsko-bilogorska i
Koprivničko-križevačka.
3. Slavonija: Osječko-baranjska, Vukovarsko-
srijemska, Virovitičko-podravsko,, Požeško-slavonska i Brodsko-
posavska.
4. Gorsko-primorska: Primorsko-goranska,
Istarska, Karlovačka, Sisačko-moslavačka, Ličko-senjska
5. Dalmacija: Splitsko-dalmatinska, Dubrovačko-
neretvanska, Šibensko-kninska i Zadarska.
12. TERITORIJALNI USTROJ
LOKALNE JEDINICE
(LAU I – II) NUTS V
429 općina
126 gradova
- 23 velika grada
- 53 jedinice - decentralizirane
Grad Zagreb
14. PROMJENE
Raspodjela općina i gradova prema stanovništvu
35
30
25
20
%
15
10
5
0
< 5.000 5.000 - 9.999 10.000 - 19.999 20.000 - 29.999 30.000 - 49.999 50.000 - 99.999 > 100.000
Broj stanovnika
Prije reforme Poslije reforme
15. PROMJENE
Broj jedinica prema broju stanovnika
400
350
300
250
Broj jedinica
200
150
100
50
0
< 5.000 5.000 - 9.999 10.000 - 19.999 20.000 - 29.999 30.000 - 49.999 50.000 - 99.999 > 100.000
Općine i gradovi grupirani po broju stanovnika
Prije reforme Poslije reforme
16. PROMJENE
Ukupan broj stanovnika po općinama i gradovima
1.500.000
1.250.000
Broj stanovnika
1.000.000
750.000
500.000
250.000
0
< 5.000 5.000 - 9.999 10.000 - 19.999 20.000 - 29.999 30.000 - 49.999 50.000 - 99.999 > 100.000
Općine i gradovi grupirani po broju stanovnika
Prije reforme Poslije reforme
17. PROMJENE
Broj stanovnika po veličini jedinice
2.100
1.950
1.800
1.650
1.500
1.350
u 000 stanovnika
1.200
1.050
900
750
600
450
300
150
0
< 100 100 - 200 200 - 300 300 - 400 400 - 500 500 >
Jedinice grupirane po veličini prostora (km2)
Prije reforme Poslije reforme
18. PROMJENE
Raspodjela jedinica po veličini
80
70
60
50
% jedinica
40
30
20
10
0
< 100 100 - 200 200 - 300 300 - 400 400 - 500 500 >
Općine i gradovi grupirani po km2
Prije reforme Poslije reforme
19. PROMJENE
Broj jedinica po veličini prostora
400
350
300
250
Broj jedinica
200
150
100
50
0
< 100 100 - 200 200 - 300 300 - 400 400 - 500 500 >
Jedinice grupirane po veličini prostora (km2)
Prije reforme Poslije reforme
