This PPT provides an in-depth analysis of the international arms trade, covering its history, regulations, and the challenges associated with controlling the flow of weapons
Non lethal weapons and force-casualty aversion in 21stOnyinye Chime
The scientific and technical advances in non-lethal weapons hold a significant potential
for minimising casualties in warfare. Such weapons are gaining operational possibilities
as a consequence of technological advances and the nature of conflict situations
encountered by military forces in the 21st
century. Casualty aversion can be identified to
be the driving factor explaining the shift in defense technology to non-lethal weapons.
Although non-lethal weapons remain an underutilised asset as shown in the slow rate
at which the defence forces of states embrace and invest in them, the need to avert
military and civilian casualties justifies why non-lethal technology has emerged in the
practice of warfare.
PRIVATE MILITARY CONTRACTORS, WAR CRIMES AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAWOnyinye Chime
The end of the Cold War witnessed the growth and spread of legally established private military contractors (PMCs) playing largely undefined roles in wars, international security and post-conflict reconstruction. The operations of PMCs in Iraq and Afghanistan in the 21st century have been marked by gross human rights abuses and poor treatment and torture of prisoners of war (POWs). Indeed, PMCs are likely to step outside their contractual obligations and commit criminal acts. This article adds to the literature on the subject by arguing that the elusiveness of PMCs’ individual or corporate responsibility for war crimes presents one of the greatest challenges for international humanitarian law (IHL). This presents a dilemma for IHL, which seeks to address individual offences. The situation becomes even more complicated when non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and multinational corporations (MNCs) are involved in the use of PMCs.
Non lethal weapons and force-casualty aversion in 21stOnyinye Chime
The scientific and technical advances in non-lethal weapons hold a significant potential
for minimising casualties in warfare. Such weapons are gaining operational possibilities
as a consequence of technological advances and the nature of conflict situations
encountered by military forces in the 21st
century. Casualty aversion can be identified to
be the driving factor explaining the shift in defense technology to non-lethal weapons.
Although non-lethal weapons remain an underutilised asset as shown in the slow rate
at which the defence forces of states embrace and invest in them, the need to avert
military and civilian casualties justifies why non-lethal technology has emerged in the
practice of warfare.
PRIVATE MILITARY CONTRACTORS, WAR CRIMES AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAWOnyinye Chime
The end of the Cold War witnessed the growth and spread of legally established private military contractors (PMCs) playing largely undefined roles in wars, international security and post-conflict reconstruction. The operations of PMCs in Iraq and Afghanistan in the 21st century have been marked by gross human rights abuses and poor treatment and torture of prisoners of war (POWs). Indeed, PMCs are likely to step outside their contractual obligations and commit criminal acts. This article adds to the literature on the subject by arguing that the elusiveness of PMCs’ individual or corporate responsibility for war crimes presents one of the greatest challenges for international humanitarian law (IHL). This presents a dilemma for IHL, which seeks to address individual offences. The situation becomes even more complicated when non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and multinational corporations (MNCs) are involved in the use of PMCs.
WAR SEEMS TO BENEFIT EVERYONE (EXCEPT THE ONES WHO DIE FIGHTING IN IT) –
PATRIOTS, POLITICIANS, ARMS INDUSTRY, PROFITEERS. CAN THERE BE AN ECONOMIC
JUSTIFICATION OF A WAR? CAN, AND SHOULD, ECONOMIC DECISIONS BE MADE IN
MORAL VACUUM?
Memorandum in August 2009 to the Multi-National Security Transition Command-IRAQNed McDonnell III, CFA PMP
This document represents the contents of a memorandum draws from unclassified information only; it represented closing thoughts on a short tour in IRAQ in 2009 as a strategic planner with M.N.S.T.C.-I. (by then under the command of General Odierno). There are nine changes made subsequent to its release. Eight are grammatical corrections (because I am the world's worst proof-reader of my own work) and two sentences underscored. Those sentences indicate that two years before the fact, there was at least one USG official (and, I am sure, many more) who foresaw the eventual withdrawal of forces from the IRAQ.
( Answer the text below in no more than 2 or 3 paragraphs ) two if.docxkatherncarlyle
( Answer the text below in no more than 2 or 3 paragraphs ) two if possible
Please be detailed,
Due Thursday 4-23-15 No Plagiarism
"War and Peace" Please respond to the following:
· Based on the Webtext materials and article below, address the following:
Discuss the in which an armed conflict can affect a developing economy and analyze the reasons why developed nations do not experience the same kinds of social upheaval.
Share
The World’s Resources
Development, War and Peace
By Lloyd J. Dumas, STRW
August 2006
Introduction
Development and peace have been two of the major concerns of national and international
political economy for more than fifty years. Yet there is considerable disagreement as to the
nature of the relationship between these two economic and political phenomena.
Some (such as the “liberals/neoliberals”) argue that development encourages peace. People in
better economic condition are less likely to initiate violent conflict both because they are more
content and because they have more to lose from the physical danger and economic disruption
that war brings. Others say that development discourages peace, either because the continued
development of some depends on their forceful suppression or control of others (as the
“dependency” theorists argue) or because development increases the capacity to build and
mobilize military power (as the “neo-realists” argue). Still others (such as the old-line “realists”)
argue that development and peace have no significant connection to each other.
In order to better understand the power and limits of the relationship between development
and peace — and in particular to explore whether development and peace naturally do, or can
be made to, reinforce each other ― it is useful to begin by setting the terms of reference. What
do we mean by “development”? What do we mean by “peace”? What do we mean by
“militarization”? And what do we mean by “war”?
Development. For many economists, development has been synonymous with economic
growth, seen as the secular expansion in the level of aggregate economic income or output,
typically measured by GNP or GDP. But I think it is important to distinguish between this kind of growth, which says nothing in particular about whether the material wellbeing of the broad
mass of the population is increasing, and development, with its connotations of improvement in
the quality of life.
Peace. The narrowest definition of peace is that it is simply the absence of war. But real peace
is more than that. A person who is not able to go about the ordinary business of life without
the constant threat of murderous violence, whether from uniformed soldiers, ragged rebel
forces, terrorists, or ordinary criminals cannot be said to be living in a state of peace.
Johan Galtung referred to the absence of war as “negative peace.” But Galtung argued that
there was a richer, more complex meaning of peace, “positive peace.” For it is not bullets and
bombs alone that kill and ma ...
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
WAR SEEMS TO BENEFIT EVERYONE (EXCEPT THE ONES WHO DIE FIGHTING IN IT) –
PATRIOTS, POLITICIANS, ARMS INDUSTRY, PROFITEERS. CAN THERE BE AN ECONOMIC
JUSTIFICATION OF A WAR? CAN, AND SHOULD, ECONOMIC DECISIONS BE MADE IN
MORAL VACUUM?
Memorandum in August 2009 to the Multi-National Security Transition Command-IRAQNed McDonnell III, CFA PMP
This document represents the contents of a memorandum draws from unclassified information only; it represented closing thoughts on a short tour in IRAQ in 2009 as a strategic planner with M.N.S.T.C.-I. (by then under the command of General Odierno). There are nine changes made subsequent to its release. Eight are grammatical corrections (because I am the world's worst proof-reader of my own work) and two sentences underscored. Those sentences indicate that two years before the fact, there was at least one USG official (and, I am sure, many more) who foresaw the eventual withdrawal of forces from the IRAQ.
( Answer the text below in no more than 2 or 3 paragraphs ) two if.docxkatherncarlyle
( Answer the text below in no more than 2 or 3 paragraphs ) two if possible
Please be detailed,
Due Thursday 4-23-15 No Plagiarism
"War and Peace" Please respond to the following:
· Based on the Webtext materials and article below, address the following:
Discuss the in which an armed conflict can affect a developing economy and analyze the reasons why developed nations do not experience the same kinds of social upheaval.
Share
The World’s Resources
Development, War and Peace
By Lloyd J. Dumas, STRW
August 2006
Introduction
Development and peace have been two of the major concerns of national and international
political economy for more than fifty years. Yet there is considerable disagreement as to the
nature of the relationship between these two economic and political phenomena.
Some (such as the “liberals/neoliberals”) argue that development encourages peace. People in
better economic condition are less likely to initiate violent conflict both because they are more
content and because they have more to lose from the physical danger and economic disruption
that war brings. Others say that development discourages peace, either because the continued
development of some depends on their forceful suppression or control of others (as the
“dependency” theorists argue) or because development increases the capacity to build and
mobilize military power (as the “neo-realists” argue). Still others (such as the old-line “realists”)
argue that development and peace have no significant connection to each other.
In order to better understand the power and limits of the relationship between development
and peace — and in particular to explore whether development and peace naturally do, or can
be made to, reinforce each other ― it is useful to begin by setting the terms of reference. What
do we mean by “development”? What do we mean by “peace”? What do we mean by
“militarization”? And what do we mean by “war”?
Development. For many economists, development has been synonymous with economic
growth, seen as the secular expansion in the level of aggregate economic income or output,
typically measured by GNP or GDP. But I think it is important to distinguish between this kind of growth, which says nothing in particular about whether the material wellbeing of the broad
mass of the population is increasing, and development, with its connotations of improvement in
the quality of life.
Peace. The narrowest definition of peace is that it is simply the absence of war. But real peace
is more than that. A person who is not able to go about the ordinary business of life without
the constant threat of murderous violence, whether from uniformed soldiers, ragged rebel
forces, terrorists, or ordinary criminals cannot be said to be living in a state of peace.
Johan Galtung referred to the absence of war as “negative peace.” But Galtung argued that
there was a richer, more complex meaning of peace, “positive peace.” For it is not bullets and
bombs alone that kill and ma ...
Similar to ISSUES IN DEVELOPMENT_ MILITARY_ GLOBAL ARMS INDUSTRY AND ARM TRADE __.pptx (12)
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
2. INTRODUCTION
❖ The global arms industry refers to the collective
network of companies and organizations involved
in the production, development, and manufacturing
of military weapons, equipment, and related
technology.
Where as The arms trade, on the other hand,
specifically refers to the buying and selling of military
weapons and equipment between countries or non-
state actors.
3. HISTORY
❖ Medieval arms trade: Local blacksmiths crafted
weapons for kings, knights, and sold designs from
looted enemies during wars.
❖ Historically, arms trade was mainly on a national scale,
but with time, it evolved into an international
phenomenon, notably during the Napoleonic Wars and
both World Wars. The US, through the Lend-Lease
Policy in 1941, supplied arms to Britain. Post-World
War II, despite the Cold War tensions, states continued
buying and selling weapons amid global fears
4. HISTORY
❖ Despite the collapse of the Soviet Union and the
apparent victory of democracy, the US remains a
major global player in arms trade. With advanced
military technology, a substantial defense budget
unaffected by economic crises, and an effective
military, the US attracts clients worldwide.
5. THE ECONOMICS OF ARMS TRADE
❖ Total global military expenditure increased by 3.7 per cent
in real terms in 2022, to reach a new high of $2240 billion.
Military expenditure in Europe saw its steepest year-on-
year increase in at least 30 years.
❖ One important component of arms sales is the use of
offsets as described by Brauer & Dunne (2005), provide
claimed benefits to developing countries by justifying arms
expenditure and promoting local industrial activity. These
offsets can be direct (related to purchased equipment) or
indirect (unrelated to specific defense equipment)
6. THE ECONOMICS OF ARMS TRADE
❖ However, Research on military expenditure faces
challenges due to limited and accurate statistics,
compounded by varying external factors among
states. A neoclassical approach views the state as a
rational actor, balancing opportunity costs and
security benefits to maximize national interest.
This perspective treats military expenditure as a
pure public good, with economic effects
determined by its opportunity cost and a clear
trade-off between civil and military spending.
7. THE ECONOMICS OF ARMS TRADE
❖ Infact, Investing in military expenditures benefits
the economy by promoting a profitable arms
industry and supporting other sectors. From a
Keynesian perspective, government spending on
the military can stimulate economic growth,
demonstrating the concept of 'military
Keynesianism.'
8. NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS
❖ According to Andrew Feinstein, author of The Shadow
World The Shadow World: Inside the Global Arms
Trade and a former member of the African National
Congress, legal and illegal arms markets are often
unclear and intertwined. He notes that bribery and
corruption are common in arms transactions, with
many involving illegality through middlemen. Citing
Transparency International, he highlights that 40% of
all global corruption in trade is linked to the arms
trade, an industry with average annual sales of $60
billion
9. NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS
❖ Corruption remains widespread, as evidenced by 84%
of retired senior Pentagon officials securing positions
with defense contractors they had previously awarded
contracts to. With arms contract deals often shrouded
in secrecy for national security reasons, uncovering
and addressing such corruption is challenging. The UN
aims to address this issue by advocating for the signing
and ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) by all
member states to prevent future corrupt arms trade
practices.
10. NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS
❖ The arms race not only benefits states but also
smaller non-state actors like terrorist
organizations obtaining arms from the illegal
black market. This trade not only wastes
resources that could fund more productive
sectors and increases national debt but also
undermines citizens' sense of security within a
state.
11. NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS
❖ Fuller (2003) introduces the concept of 'military
Keynesianism,' applying Keynesian economic
principles to military spending, creating demand
for military goods. While proponents see it as
beneficial for job creation, Garrett-Peltier (2010)
cautions against solely relying on military spending
for economic solutions, urging consideration of
alternative job creation in productive areas aligned
with long-term goals.
12. NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS
❖ DEBATE
➢ JK Galbraith : For the price of a smallish fleet of manned
supersonic bombers, a modern mass transit system
could be built in virtually every city large enough to
have a serious bus line. What would be built then?
❖ As Fuller puts it, the arms trade is not to help boost the
state economy, but instead: …the booming arms industry is
driven firstly by the need for security in a volatile world
that some claim is actually more dangerous than during the
relative stability of the Cold War ‘balance of power’ era,
and secondly by the profit motive
13. NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS
❖ Chomsky disagrees with Fuller, asserting that in a
world dominated by one superpower, like the US,
massive defense spending is unnecessary for
genuine security or strategic reasons Fuller adds
that the arms trade is a continuous cycle, creating
demand while arguing that the supposed "need to
upgrade security" is just rhetoric
14. NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS
❖ As the arms industry, particularly in the US, grows,
Chomsky suggests that making weapons with built-in
obsolescence could increase profits. The idea is that
foreign buyers would constantly desire the latest
missile, tank, and plane models to "keep up with the
Joneses." This creates a dynamic where states
compete to purchase the newest weapons
technology, leading to an arms race. Once these
weapons become outdated, they are sold to other
countries at a lower price, enabling them to enhance
their national security
15. ILLEGAL ARMS TRADE
❖ In 1997, there were 13.2 million refugees and 4.9
million internally displaced people, with a
disproportionate number being women and
children. In Rwanda's refugee camps, child
mortality reached 300 per 100,000 per day.
Displaced communities experienced child
mortality rates over 60% higher than non-
displaced children in the same country.
16. NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS
❖ Garrett-Peltier and Pollin's article reveals that in
the US, spending on clean energy, health care, and
education creates more jobs per dollar than military
spending. For example, if $1 billion is spent on
education instead of military expenses, over 26,700
new jobs would be created, compared to the mere
11,200 jobs generated in the military with the same
amount.
17. ILLEGAL ARMS TRADE
❖ Illegal arms trade, selling weapons unlawfully to
entities like terrorist groups, is a global concern. This
secretive trade is concentrated in conflict-prone
areas, accounting for 50% of all circulating weapons.
❖ Illegal arms traders not only sell locally
manufactured conventional firearms but also
military-grade weapons and combat vehicles. While
increased arms procurement alone may not create
conflicts, the excessive accumulation and
widespread availability can heighten tension.
18. ILLEGAL ARMS TRADE
❖ So, the UN's proposed Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), signed by 118
countries, aims to prevent uncontrolled arms flows to conflict
regions, fostering peace and security. It also seeks to hinder the
supply of arms to human rights abusers and violators of the law of
war, addressing a significant contributing factor to global instability.
❖ Despite having numerous human rights abuses, North Korea, Iran,
and Syria cynically disapproved of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT),
which aims to prevent the type of atrocities they have committed.
These countries are also known for illegally arming terrorists and
dissident factions, making the ATT crucial for global security.
19. Short questions
1. ATT
2. NPT
3. CTBT
4. PTBT
5. Evaluate/critically analyse the ATT Treaty?
6. Examine how the global arms race affects the economy
of nations.
7. Write briefly on Global Arms Trade?
8. Discuss How the Global Arms Industry and Arms Trade
give rise to military conflicts.