Legal medicine deals with the application of medical knowledge to legal purposes and the administration of justice. It includes forensic medicine, which applies medical knowledge to establish facts in legal cases, and medical jurisprudence, which involves knowledge of law in relation to medical practice. Legal medicine is relevant to both civil and criminal law, for issues like determining mental capacity and establishing causes of death. In legal proceedings, medical experts can provide direct testimony or expert opinions, while ordinary witnesses provide information from personal knowledge. Hearsay is generally inadmissible but there are exceptions, like dying declarations. Evidence must meet standards like preponderance of evidence or proof beyond reasonable doubt to determine outcomes.
It was so important and prudent to include a right to reasonable bail in the Bill of Rights because bail is inherently intertwined with a defendant's right to innocence until proven guilty. A person should have the right to be released on bail while preparing for their trial.
One of the most important rights of an individual formally charged with a "serious crime" is the right to a jury trial. ... Persons accused of crimes have the right to have their guilt or innocence determined by a panel of fellow-citizens.
Realizado por:
Mariengelly Sánchez.
C.I:24.942.562.
Prof.: Abg. Cristina Virguéz .
Electiva introducción a la criminalística.
SAIA C.
Barquisimeto junio 2016.
Judgment is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular court order.
It was so important and prudent to include a right to reasonable bail in the Bill of Rights because bail is inherently intertwined with a defendant's right to innocence until proven guilty. A person should have the right to be released on bail while preparing for their trial.
One of the most important rights of an individual formally charged with a "serious crime" is the right to a jury trial. ... Persons accused of crimes have the right to have their guilt or innocence determined by a panel of fellow-citizens.
Realizado por:
Mariengelly Sánchez.
C.I:24.942.562.
Prof.: Abg. Cristina Virguéz .
Electiva introducción a la criminalística.
SAIA C.
Barquisimeto junio 2016.
Judgment is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular court order.
Chapter 6Introduction to LawLearning Objectives (1 of 2)JinElias52
Chapter 6
Introduction to Law
Learning Objectives (1 of 2)
Understand the meaning and objectives of tort law.
Describe the elements of negligence.
Explain how the commission and omission of an act differ.
Describe the importance of foreseeability in a negligence case.
Describe intentional torts and how they might occur in the healthcare setting.
2
Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
Describe the various crimes and give examples of how they might occur in the healthcare setting.
Explain the various elements of a contract.
Describe the pretrial and trial process.
Tort Law
A tort is a wrong, other than a breach of contract, committed against a person or property for which a court provides a remedy, generally in the form of monetary damages.
Objectives of Tort Law
Preservation of peace between individuals
Fault-finding for wrongdoing
Deterrence to wrongful acts
Indemnify injured person(s)
Negligence
Commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do under given circumstances.
Commission of an Act
Administering wrong medication
Administering wrong dosage of a medication
Administering medication to the wrong patient
Performing a procedure without patient consent
Performing procedure on wrong patient
Surgically removing the wrong body part
Failing to assess and reassess a patient’s nutritional needs
Omission of an Act
Failure to administer medication(s)
Failure to order required diagnostic tests
Failure to follow up on abnormal test results
Failure to perform “time-out” prior to the start of surgery to ensure the correct procedure is being conducted on the correct patient at the correct site
Malpractice
Negligence of a professional person:
Surgeon who conducts surgery on the wrong body part.
Nurse who administers wrong medication, injuring patient.
Pharmacist who mislabels a medication and the patient is harmed.
Forms of Negligence
Malfeasance
Misfeasance
Nonfeasance
Malfeasance
Execution of an unlawful or improper act.
Performing a partial birth abortion when prohibited by law.
Performing a procedure without having the appropriate credentials.
Misfeasance
Improper performance of an act.
Wrong-sided surgery.
Leaving an instrument in the patient’s body.
Nonfeasance
Failure to act when there is a duty to act.
Failure to prescribe antibiotics when indicated.
Failure to respond to emergency call.
Four Elements of Negligence
Duty to care
Breach of duty
Injury
Causation
Duty to Care
Legal obligation of care imposed on one to safeguard rights of others.
Duty created by statute:
Defendant must have been within specified class of persons outlined in the statute.
Plaintiff must have been injured in a way statute was designed to prevent.
Plaintiff must show that injury would not have occurred if the statute had not been violated.
Standard of Care
Actual performance of an individual in a given situation will be measured against what a reasonably prudent person would or would ...
Is health information always admissible as evidence in court Explai.pdfjeeteshmalani1
Is health information always admissible as evidence in court? Explain your answer and provide
APA references.
Solution
What is one of the most important non-clinical uses of the medical redcord?
It serves as the legal document recording a particular episode of a patient\'s care. (of the facility
and treatment)
When can a patient\'s information be disclosed?
With the written consent or authorization of the patient.
pursuant to statutory requirements or on proper legal process.
Define Evidence
Testimony, writings, material objects, or other things presented to prove or disprove a fact.
Define ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE
Info. or things that may be admitted as evidence in a trial if the applicable rules establish that the
info. is BOTH PERTINENT and PROPER (timely, accurate, complete records) for the the judge
or jury to consider when deciding issues involved in the lawsuit.
What is HEARSAY?
Out-of-court statements that are offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Not signed
under oath.
Why are medical records considered hearsay evidence?
Because the health-care providers making the statements, (entries into the record) do not do so
under oath in a court of law. Therefore under the Hearsay rule they are not admissible as
evidence in court.
So, if Hearsay evidence is not addmisible in court, how can medical records be an exception to
the rule? There ARE exceptions to the rule...
BUSINESS RECORD EXCEPTION to the HEARSAY EXEMPTION RULE specifically allows
medical records to be used as evidence. if the person offering the records can successfully
convince the judge the records are kept in the ordinary course of business and not in preparation
for litigation.
BUSINESS RECORD EXCEPTION to the HEARSAY EXEMPTION RULE
HIM Mgr. / Custodian must establish in court the FOUNDATION and TRUSTWORTHINESS
of their record-keeping.
The three elements of a FOUNDATION REQUIREMENT to the hearsay exemption?
Person submitting the evidence must extablish that the record was;
1. Made and kept in the ordinary course of business
2. recorded at or near the time the event
3. By a person with knowledge of the facts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses appearing
in it.
How is TRUSTWORTHINESS REQUIREMENT to the hearsay exception established?
One of the requirements of the Business Record Exemption to the hearsay rule. HIM/custodian
must testify to:
- Internal policies/procedures governing access to meddical record
- quality control techniques (i.e. corrections & abbreviations of the record)
How does the party wishing to introduce a medical record as evidence establish the accuracy and
trustworthiness of the medical record?
They will bring in the custodian of medical records to testify to the accuracy and trustworthiness
of the records.
How does the Medical Records Custodian testify as to both the foundation and trustworthiness
requirements of the business record exception?
The custodian, the HIM professional, testifies in a trial or deposition:
- To FOUNDATION - testifi.
Michael Lynn: Capacity and Consent Issues [presented at Mental Health Law Con...Darius Whelan
Capacity and Consent Issues - Mr Michael Lynn, Senior Counsel
Presented at Mental Health Law Conference 2015 - Centre for Criminal Justice & Human Rights, School of Law, University College Cork and Irish Mental Health Lawyers Association
25 April 2015
http://www.imhla.ie
#mhlaw2015
"whenever any medico-legal case comes to the hospital, the medical officer on duty should inform the Duty Constable, giving the name, age, sex of the patient and the place of occurrence of the incident and should start the treatment of the patient.
It will be the duty of the said Constable to inform the nearest concerned police station or higher police functionaries for further action.
“Juris”- Law “Prudentia”- Knowledge . Therefore, Knowledge of Law
-In relation to practice of Medicine
-In relation with legal consequences
Medical Jurisprudence is also known as legal medicine.
Medical jurisprudence or legal medicine is the branch of science and medicine involving the study and application of scientific and medical knowledge to legal problems, such as inquests and in the field of law.
medical
judisprudence
legal medicine
dentistry
mbbs doctors
ethics
rules in medicine
medical practise
consents
autopsy
doctor patient state relation
medical negligence
biomedical
medical devices
malpractice
medico legal cases
dental course
dr. swostik devkota
bright line dental care
Handling Medico Legal Cases and Documentation : Brought Dead ProtocolRitwikSaurabh5
In India, the protocol for handling medico-legal cases, including the process for dealing with brought dead cases, may vary slightly based on state or local regulations. However, the following steps are generally followed:
1. Initial response and assessment: Medical personnel should promptly respond to the brought dead case and assess the patient's condition to confirm the person's demise. The medical professional should ensure that all necessary life-saving measures have been attempted before pronouncing the person dead.
2. Pronouncement of death: A qualified medical professional, usually a doctor, should formally pronounce the person dead. The doctor should follow the guidelines and legal requirements set by the Medical Council of India and the respective state medical council.
3. Identification and documentation: The identity of the deceased should be established through personal identification documents if available. The details should be recorded accurately and legibly. If identification documents are not available, physical features, tattoos, scars, or any other distinguishing characteristics should be documented.
4. Preservation of evidence: If there are any signs of foul play or suspicious circumstances surrounding the death, it's crucial to secure the scene and preserve any potential evidence. This includes ensuring that the area is not disturbed and that personal belongings, clothing, or any other items that might provide relevant information are properly collected, documented, and stored.
5. Contacting authorities: In cases involving unnatural or suspicious deaths, local law enforcement authorities and the appropriate medico-legal department or forensic unit should be informed promptly. They will guide the medical personnel through the necessary procedures and may initiate further investigations.
6. Documentation: Detailed and accurate documentation is crucial. The following information should be recorded:
- Date, time, and location of the incident
- Name, age, and gender of the deceased
- Circumstances of death (e.g., witnessed collapse, cause of injury)
- Names and contact information of witnesses, if any
- Names of the personnel involved in the response
- Details of any injuries, wounds, or marks on the body
- Actions taken, such as resuscitation attempts or other medical interventions
- Observations regarding rigor mortis, lividity, or other significant findings
- Notable external findings or conditions (e.g., presence of medical devices, pregnancy, signs of drug abuse)
7. Medico-legal case report: A comprehensive medico-legal case report should be prepared based on the gathered information and findings. The report should be objective, factual, and avoid speculation or personal opinions. It should include a summary of the incident, the cause of death if determined, and any other relevant information.
Few More information available in slides. Please refer it for more along with the brought dead.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
2. General Consideration
Legal Medicine
Is a branch of medicine which deals with application of medical
knowledge to the purposes of law and in the administration of
justice.
Forensic Medicine
Is the branch of medicine dealing with t he application of medical
knowledge to establish facts in civil or criminal legal cases, such as
an investigation into t he cause and time of a suspicious death.
Also known as forensic pathology.
5. General Consideration
Law
Is a rule of conduct, just, obligatory, laid by legitimate power for
common observance and benefit.
Forensics
It denotes anything belonging to the court of law or used in court
or legal proceedings or something fitted for legal or public
argumentations.
6. General Consideration
Medicine
Is a science and art dealing with prevention, cure and alleviation
o f disease. It is that part of science and art of restoring and
preserving health.
Legal
Is that which pertains to law, arising out of, b y virtue of or
included in law. It also refers to anything conformable to the
letters or rules o f l aw as it is administered by t he court.
7.
8. General Consideration
Jurisprudence
It is a practical science which investigates the nature, origin,
development and functions of law.
Civil Law
Is a mass of precepts that determines and regulates the relation
of assistance, authority, and obedience between members of a
family and those which exist among members of a society for
the protection of private interest
9. General Consideration
Criminal Law
Is that branch or division of law which defines crimes, treats of
their nature and provides for their punishment.
Remedial Law
Is that branch or division of l aw which deals with the rules
concerning pleadings, practices and procedures in all courts of the
Philippines.
10. General Consideration
Special Law
• Dangerous Drug Act ( R.A. 6425, a s amended)
• Youth and Child Welfare Code ( P.D. 603)
• Insurance Law ( Act No. 2 427 as amended)
• Code o f Sanitation (P.D. 856)
Evidence
Is the means, sanctioned by the Rules of Court, of ascertaining in
a judicial proceeding the truth respecting a matter of f act (Sec. 1,
Rule 128, Rules of Court).
11. General Consideration
Medical Witness
Are physicians, nurses, surgeons or other licensed practitioners whose
skills and experience qualify them to testify on a particular medical area.
Ordinary Witness
Is someone who personally saw or heard something about the crime.
Expert Witness
Is someone who has special expertise about an element of the crime.
12. The Scope of Legal Medicine
It is the application of medical and paramedical sciences as demanded
by law and administration of justice.
The Nature of the Study of Legal Medicine
A knowledge of legal medicine means the ability to acquire facts, the
power to arrange those facts in their logical order, and to draw a
conclusion from the facts which m ay be useful in the administration of
justice.
13. The Nature of the Study of Legal Medicine
• A side from being a preceptor of fact, he must possess the
power to impart t o others verbally or in writing all those he
has observed.
• A physician who specializes or is involved primarily with
medicolegal duties is known as medical jurist, (medical
examiner, medicolegal officer, medico-legal expert).
• Health officers, medical officers of Jaw enforcement
agencies and members of the medical staff of accredited
hospital are authorized by law to perform autopsies ( Sec.
95, P.D. 8 56, Code of Sanitation).
14. Legal medicine | Forensic medicine |
Medical Jurisprudence
•Legal Medicine: primarily the application of medicine
to legal eases.
•Forensic Medicine: medicine concerns with the
application of medical science to elucidate legal
problems.
•Medical Jurisprudence: knowledge of law in relation
to the practice of medicine.
15. Ordinary Physician | Medical Jurist
An ordinary physician sees an injury or disease on the point of
view of treatment, while a medico-jurist sees injury or disease
on the point of view of cause.
The purpose of an ordinary physician examining a patient is
to arrive at a definite diagnosis so that appropriate treatment
can be instituted, while the purpose of the medical jurist in
examining a patient i s to include those bodily lesions in his
report and testify before the court or before an investigative
body; thus giving justice to whom it is due.
16. Ordinary Physician | Medical Jurist
Minor or trivial injuries are usually ignored by an ordinary
clinician inasmuch as they do not require usual treatment.
Superficial abrasions, small contusion and other minor injuries
will heal without medication. However, a medical jurist must
record all bodily injuries even if they are small or minor
because these injuries may be proofs to qualify the crime or
to justify the act.
17. Direct Evidence | Circumstantial Evidence
Direct Evidence: That which proves the fact in dispute without
the aid of any inference or presumption. The evidence
presented corresponds to the precise or actual point at issue.
Circumstantial Evidence: The proof of fact or facts from which,
taken either singly or collectively, the existence of a particular
fact in dispute may be inferred as a necessary or probable
consequence.
18. Ordinary Witness | Expert Witness
Ordinary witness: A physician who testifies in court on matters
perceived from his patient in the course of physician-patient
relationship. (Sec. 20, Rule 130, Rules of Court)
Exception: Privilege of Communication between physician and patient.
(Sec. 24 c, Rule 130)
Expert witness: A physician on account of his training and experience
can give his opinion on a set of medical facts. He can deduce or infer
something, determine the cause of death, or render opinion pertinent
to the issue and medical nature. (Sec. 48-49, Rule 130)
19. Forms of Law
1. Written or Statutory Law (Lex Scripta)
composed of laws which are produced by the country's legislations
and which are defined, codified and incorporated by the l aw-
making body e.g. Laws of the PH
2. Unwritten or Common Law (Lex non Scripta)
composed of the unwritten laws based on immemorial customs and
usages. It is sometimes referred to as case l aw, common l aw,
jurisprudence or customary law e.g. Laws of England
20. Principle of Stare Decisis
A principle that, when the court has once l aid down a
principle of l aw or interpretation as applied to a
certain state of facts, it will adhere to and apply to all
future cases where the facts are substantially the
same.
21. Application of Legal Medicine to Civil Law
In civil law, knowledge of legal medicine may be useful on the
following:
a. The determination and termination of civil personality (Art. 40 and
41),
b. The limitation or restriction of a natural person's capacity to act
(Art. 23 and 39);
c. The marriage and legal separation (Book I, Title III & IV);
d. The paternity and filiation (Book I, Title VIII); and
e. The testamentary capacity of a person making a will (Book III, Title
IV).
22. Application of Legal Medicine to Criminal
Law
Legal medicine is applicable i n the following provisions of the
penal code:
a. Circumstances affecting criminal liability (Title I);
b. Crimes against person (Title VIII), and
c. Crimes against chastity (Title XI)
23. Application of Legal Medicine to Remedial
Law
Legal Medicine may be applied in the following provisions of
the Rules of Court:
a. Physical and mental examination of a person (Rule 28);
b. Proceedings for hospitalization of an insane person (Rule
101); and
c. Rules on evidences (Part IV)
24. Hearsay Information
•As a rule, these are not admissible in court.
•Hearsay evidences are those not proceeding from the
personal knowledge of the witness but from mere
repetition of what he has heard others say.
•It is a "second hand" evidence which rest mainly on
the veracity and competence of its source.
25. Privileged Communication
Sec 21(c), ROC - Privileged Communication
A person authorized to practice medicine, surgery or
obstetrics cannot in a civil case, without the consent of the
patient, be examined as to any information which he may
have acquired in attending such patient in a professional
capacity, which information was necessary to enable him to
act in that capacity, and which would blacken the character of
the patient
26. Dying Declaration
One of the exceptions to the non-admissibility of hearsay
evidence.
The declaration of a dying person under the consciousness of
his impending death as regards circumstance regarding his
impending death i s admissible i n spite of the fact that it is a
hearsay, it is made so because of necessity and it is
trustworthy. Sec 31, Rule 130, ROC - Dying Declaration
27. Dying Declaration
One of the exceptions to the non-admissibility of hearsay
evidence.
The declaration of a dying person under the consciousness of
his impending death as regards circumstance regarding his
impending death i s admissible i n spite of the fact that it is a
hearsay, it is made so because of necessity and it is
trustworthy. Sec 31, Rule 130, ROC - Dying Declaration
28. How Evidence are Preserved:
• Photographs, audio and/or video tape, micro-film,
photostat, xerox, voice tracing, etc.
• Sketching
• Description
• Manikin Method
• Preservation in the Mind of the Witness
• Special Methods
29. Preponderance of Evidence
Sec 1, Rule 133, ROC
The following factors must be considered which party's evidence preponderate:
a. All the facts and circumstances of the case.
b. The witnesses' manner of testifying, their intelligence, their means and
opportunities of knowing the facts to which they are testifying.
c. The nature of the facts to which the witnesses testify.
d. The probability and improbability of the witnesses' testimony.
e. The interest or want of interest of the witnesses.
f. Credibility of the witness so far as the same may legitimately appear upon
the trial.
g. The number of witnesses presented, although preponderance is not
necessarily with the greatest number
30. Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Sec 2, Rule 133, ROC
Proof beyond reasonable doubt does not mean such a
degree of proof as, excluding possibility of error, produces
absolute certainty. Moral certainty only is required, or that
degree of proof which produces conviction in an
unprejudiced mind.
It is presumed that a person is innocent of a crime until the
contrary is proven beyond reasonable doubt.
31. Branches of Law
1. Civil Law
2. Criminal Law
3. Remedial Law
4. Special Law
32. Basic Principles of Law
1. Ignorance of the l aw excuses no one from compliance therewith or
"ignorantia legis nominem excusat" (Art 3, Civil Code)
2. Laws shall have no retroactive effect, unless the contrary i s provided (Art. 4,
Civil Code)
3. Rights may be waived, unless the waiver i s contrary to l aw, public order,
public policy, morals or good customs, or prejudicial to a third person with a
right recognized by l aw (Art. 6, Civil Code)
4. Customs which are contrary to l aw, public order or public policy shall not be
countenanced (Art. 11, Civil Code). A custom must be proved as a fact
according to the rules of evidence (Sec. 12, Civil Code)
5. Laws are repealed only by subsequent ones, and their violation or non-
observance shall not be excused by disuse, custom or practice to the contrary.
33. Persons Authorized to Perform Autopsies
1. Health officers
2. Medical officers of law enforcement agencies
3. Members of the medical staff of accredited hospitals
34. When Autopsies Shall Be Performed
1. Whenever required by special laws;
2. Upon order of a competent court, a mayor and a provincial
or city fiscal;
3. Upon written request of police authorities,
4. Whenever the Solicitor General, provincial or city fiscal
deem it necessary to disinter and take possession of the
remains for examination to determine the cause of death;
5. Whenever the nearest kin shall request in writing the
authorities concerned to ascertain the cause of death.
35. Types of Medical Evidence
1. Autoptic or Real Evidence
2. Testimonial Evidence
3. Experimental Evidence
4. Documentary Evidence
5. Physical Evidence
36. Kinds of Evidence Necessary for Conviction
1. Direct Evidence
2. Circumstantial Evidence