Interpolative Scope V4 Justification of Prototypes

Interpolative
Scope New
Attributes
Demand Specs
Justify Build
Latent
Concept
Process
Requirements
Emulation Stage
MDIA
V4 Justifying Prototypes
Preliminary Stage
We are here
Brij Consulting, Jean Marshall
Method

Bridge
Building in Ark
Design
Ark Process
Digital
Mechanic
Production Book
Design
Configuration
Gate Arch
Gated Process and
Interpolated
Conditions
Plait Process
Up or Down
Scale
Instances
Plait Objects or
Materials
• How do interpolations help to
know the timing and the
acceptability of New Products
• Matrix must be specified
• Process must be proposed
• A Customer Profile must be
established
• How is Intuitive Demand Sought?
• Data must be “innocent”
• The Critical Path must be probable
and potential but not likely
• 80% of the events should be
discovered related to New Product
Original Conceptual Thinking is Innocent but Undeveloped, it is the Undiscovered Land

Dialogue Write
Stream
Mu Sic
2/1/2021 Brij Consulting, Jean Marshall 3
What will Digital Portals Produce?

The STREAM changes the Landscape
PT
PT= Sales Differences are Pass Thru Gains from yield at Gate Slides 10 & 15
S.E.G.C SEGC: Subject to Engineering Change

Green Incentive for Glass

The Plait Properties of Glass
The Plait properties of Glass replace any concept of the way the
world was working before. There are so many uses of the plait
form of glass that they are too numerous for written
consideration because they replace everything. But God made
man to cultivate the earth and this new form is part of it.
Glass has these well conceived
properties demonstrated already…
1. Permanence
2. Redundancy Engineering
3. Imaging Retention
4. Immediacy of Upgrade
5. Unable to be re-engineered
6. Human Correspondence
7. Eternal Approbation

The Remote capability of God's Ark is seen with the 11
Cherubim of which the Lord is also 1, from the cover of
Magnificat Magazine
In the Book of Ezekiel and (at least some) Christian
icons, the cherub is depicted as having two pairs of
wings, and four faces: that of a lion (representative
of all wild animals), an ox (domestic animals), a
human (humanity), and an eagle (birds).[4] Their legs
were straight, the soles of their feet like the hooves
of a bull, gleaming like polished brass. (Wikipedia)
The Symbols from the Ark of God are more intrinsically drawn
than the way they are described anywhere because they
represent more scientific theory than we are capable of
comprehending now. God is the Maker of Worlds and He has
lived forever, so that He has infinite knowledge which has no
real reference to anything we possess.
While the devil was once a Cherubim, he barely possessed any
advanced knowledge before absconding with an Ark related
capability and starting the immense troubles that he brought
about to God. God continued with His Plan to translate mankind
to everlasting life, for all those who OBSERVE HIS WAYS.
If God did not love+ man with an everlasting love+ the devil
would be put out immediately. But the repository of souls is an
implicitly devised condition upon which the earth and all its
Plans are built. Further God does not settle His score
immediately because He can see better ways to plot through
History and accomplish His Goals.
The devil constantly overwrites himself and has no real
constancy or credible resource. God uses it as the passing phase
upon which the underlying conditions of mortal existence are
changed. God's intentions are to plait a new stone of
everlasting quality and dimension upon which man may co-
operate in the New Creation.
Cherubim have four faces: one of a man,
an ox, a lion, and an eagle (later adopted as
the symbols of the four evangelists). They
have four conjoined wings covered with
eyes (although Revelation 4:8 appears to
describe them with six wings like
the seraphim), a lion's body, and the feet
of oxen. Cherubim guard the way to the
tree of life in the Garden of Eden (Genesis
3:24)[5] and the throne of God (Ezekiel
28:14–16).[6]
The cherubim are mentioned in Genesis
3:24,[5] Exodus 25:17–22, 2 Chronicles 3:7–
14, Ezekiel 10:12–14[7] and 28:14–16,[6] and
1 Kings 6:23–28.[8]
Modern English usage has blurred the
distinction between cherubim
and putti. Putti are the often wingless
(sometimes winged) human baby/toddler-
like beings traditionally used in figurative
art.
St. Thomas Aquinas imagined Satan as a
fallen Cherub.[9]
Wikipedia
7
God maintains what is old in order
to bring about something new
144 =12^2
1000 =10^3
144000

V2 Articulating in Glass
We're looking for the way to find all those like vectors
across a broad spectrum that may correspond to the
parameters of our project... This is a way to discover how
the Supply Chain of vendors and customers could supply a
match and a timely market for a new product
Find the
Price, Cost, Scope
Vector for New product
Wall Definition Data is from Functional Glass prior to
annotating data sets for correlation and testing to derive L See T- Test Ref I
(200,000,000,000.00)
(150,000,000,000.00)
(100,000,000,000.00)
(50,000,000,000.00)
-
50,000,000,000.00
100,000,000,000.00
150,000,000,000.00
200,000,000,000.00
Sum of Sum of wall
Sum of Sum of brace
Sum of Sum of thread
Sum of Sum of annex1
Grand Total
Setup
Brace
Conversion
Final
Gains
Thread
Wall
Y Union
2/1/2021 Brij Consulting, Jean Marshall
8
We updated this V2 on 2/6/21 JAM

Discovery of an Attributable Matrix
y = -10,557,292,316.19x + 71,372,466,705.77
R² = 0.38 y = 5,704,942,992.74x - 21,610,602,465.61
R² = 0.05
y = 9,324,831,128.91x - 55,114,119,001.07
R² = 0.55
y = -1,935,321,712.76x + 13,139,008,637.48
R² = 0.01
y = -7,268,738,896.40x + 58,195,801,531.77
R² = 0.25
y = -330.41x + 2,896.68
R² = 0.51 wall
brace
thread
annex1
annex2
annex3
Linear (wall)
Linear (brace)
Linear (thread)
Linear (annex1)
Linear (annex2)
Linear (annex3)
In an unknown product with a latent demand, it is
difficult to line up the attributes that would indicate
which customers or vendors would appreciate it. If
there is a set of product characteristics that help to
point to those relationships it would be a good
beginning step to define a near set of attributes
GLASS WAVE SPECS
Original Bayesian Test Data for Glass Attributes
9
What is Latent Demand?
Latent demand is basically
the desire for a product that a
consumer is unable to satisfy
because he is himself unable
to point it out or doesn’t
realize what is missing until
pointed out. This need cannot
be satisfied by current
product or services and the
consumer himself cannot
articulate the type of product
which will help him
Do we have a plausible scale
for digital portal growth?
Example of 20-year
growth in Digital Excel
Functional Utility Growth Test
10x
.0636-
.0612=
.0024
Yield net

Attributes:
1. GSP = 500.5
2. Theta Object = 176.2
3. Scope Manifold = 2904 +/- 36
4. Area Correspondence =
10.0224 perfect map
5. Underlying Distribution=
23.22 @ Scale
6. Z time 21.7
Story #1: Specifications in Glass
See Ink-up
Slide 11
New Map
Correlation
SEND
SPECS
10
.612
GT=171,442,846,566/17,179,869,184=9.97
PT
PT= Sales Differences are Pass Thru Gains from yield at Gate slide 15
See Pre-Gate
^^Used for PT calculation
^^

PVM Ink-up
2/1/2021
11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Unapplied burden
Some update was added JAM 2/5
171442846566/-17048749335=-10.0560
2
See Slide 12
Burden Applied at Gate slide 15
^^Used for PT calculation Slide 10

Engineering
Requirements
Brace
Conversion
Final
Gains
Setup
Thread
Wall
Y Union
Sum of wall
Sum of thread
Sum of annex2
Glass Foundation
Data Specifications…
• Emulation from Financial Formulation
Model, not Engineered for Physical Wall
Formation or Heat/Cascade Requirements
• Data formed to make interior cube visible
• Wall is for Discovery of Cascade
Potential in Wave Glass Development
2
Loading, Leveraging,
Motivating and Timing
are Engineering
Problems when Force is
Applied
SEND
PROBLEM
Instances Plait Curve
Foil up, Cascade Down
sample
Send problem
out for review
by major firms
See Slide 16

V3 Vendor and
Customer Profiling
How do we consider the Digital Portal
capability in Vendor and Customer Profiling
and delivery of new product demand
specifications across a wide market venue?
Looking at what changes in the profile composition:
From Map-IT Ralph
Scorecard Integration
We were using the Scorecard-Portfolio Method to
emulate until we got to the Plait Glass Emulation and
found the means to plait-out differences and develop
an equity based digital production. This happened as
we got into the Ark Scale of Delivery and reached
upper limit of assembly capability and turned to plait
to increase thruput. Scalable Energy Based Materials
are Required to develop Instancing.
See last slide
Discovery Mode
of Emulation
Future
1. Scalable energy-based
materials
2. Glass with multi-surface
layers and elemental
capability
3. Wall cascade and
interoperability with heat
Emulating the Process Concept We updated this V3 on 2/6/21 JAM
Next
paper

Reduced Demand for Travel,
increased Glass in Portal Mode
• No need to travel to examine
facilities or materials
• Onsite remote building when
applicable or maintenance
• Increased Demand for Glass
will give a New Price to
mobility
• Increased Virtual Supply Chain
Activity and fewer conferences
except in assembly through
portals
• Bi-locutions through proxy
arrangement and proxy
matriculation in manifold
requirement
• Glass Wall and Cascade
delivery systems required in
Digital Portal Mode
2/5/2021 14
Demand Curve
Slide 17
Increased Thruput
FUNCTIONAL FACTS

Pre-Gate Considerations
We have made some determinations:
• We note the Preliminary Material
considerations are presented without
carrying the burden requirement and
without having a determination about
the heat element and force
requirement, nor about the general
cascade requirement to motivate
carriage in terms of engineering.
• The ongoing dialogue has to sponsor
the plan for the future motivation of
these objects and elements to the gate.
• And how the digital portal will be
modeled with a frame relationship in its
relay sponsorship to a network
arrangement.
• The use of the digital portal to sponsor
a much heavier ark relationship in the
future may or man not impinge on its
design elements now
• Glass instances are the ultimate plait
goal of this first institutional delivery.
• We can configure the financial load and
a “price” but not at the level of
engineering requirement for the build
2/6/2021 15
Gate Metrics
PT
Gate to Instance i Value
X2 =308.2 Asset
Delivery @ Gate
Net Yield =.0.612041061693091-
.6164816928(ax2)=-.0004440631106909^^
PT includes Conversion on Yield @ Gate
^^
Next
paper
Slide 10 & 11
Slide 11

Profiling of Customers and
Vendors, Digital Portal
What do we need to know to identify Customers?
(aside from credit history and the norm of background,
broad applications criteria.)
• How would they use this product?
• What controls are necessary to keep both
customers and the portal applications safe?
Knowing this would also assist in the building out
of Customer profiles
• What kind of customers demonstrate the need for
this latent demand or its plethora of products?
2/5/2021 16
Utility
Function
What do we need to know to identify Vendors? (aside
from credit history and the norm of background, broad
applications criteria.)
• How would they build this product?
• What controls are necessary to vendor
sponsorship?
• What kind of vendors demonstrate the capability
to acquire skills to assist this latent demand or its
plethora of products?
What kind of engineering and
material specialists are required?
Equity
S.E.G.C. SEGC: Subject to Engineering Change

Mapping Future Prospects
Obtaining the Solid Facts on Future Development is dependent on a Largely Available Workforce
y = 458,760.00000x2 - 2,359,320.00000x + 2,949,136.00000
R² = 1.00000
y = 7968x2 - 40032x + 48448
R² = 1
(200,000)
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
(5,000)
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
Current Excel 97 and earlier Multiplier
Digital Change
rows columns Poly. (rows) Poly. (columns)
Industrial Physics Capabilities
Digital Portal Development Scope
Roughed Map Object for Redrawing

V4 Justifying the Build-out
of Prototypes
What can Glass do in
Predefined Instances?
y = 0.134x2 - 3.8971x + 34.983
R² = 0.1439
y = 0.1046x2 - 3.191x + 30.83
R² = 0.1403
(10.0)
-
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Line of Best Fit: Sprints
Sprint1
Sprint2
Sprint3
Sprint4
Sprint5
Series6
Series7
• More functionality and more utility
in every system
• Worldwide Dimensional Networking
• Field Design and Re-composition in Portal
Design
• Production Staging and Correlation of before
and after positions (Predication View)
Traveling eye : hand remote
capability with carriage
Different
cascade and
motion theory
in Glass Wall

Engineering Requirement
New
Attributes
Demand Specs
Justify Build
$28T
We can not legitimately justify the build on this
requirement without input at multiple levels of
engineering practice, because the costing and
production level of staging instances which has never
been formulated in the overt drama of human events.
We are promised that the production of portal
developed assets and digital/ark design is for the
common good making it a Covenant based practice with
moral achievement within it.
We are using VALUE BASED
ENGINEERING and believe that Glass
will overcome the hurdles present in
the inability to rise above node- to-
node transferability mechanics MDIA
This, is why our papers carry this Seal as a
determination of the Goodness to God fit for our
use in Intelligent Applications and arrangements;
Also, in using Divine Model Symbolic Association
including “Mother of Divine Invention Approbation”
referring to the ARK and tooling necessities.
Next
paper
Defining Requirements is
part of the Process
Emerging Tech

Interoperability Mechanics
Although we are referring to an Ark Cloud Arrangement
that is essentially invisible to the STREAM it
accomplishes the Covenant requirements of reconcilable
natural law and attainment of standards and principles
of achievement. The important facts are always
conveyed and ‘no guessing’ at requirements. There is no
ominous or negligent overtones or undertones to the
process. As a new process this becomes clouded in the
onset of it but less mysterious as we gain traction. This
is because everyone becomes a party to the
arrangement and equipped with an advancing capability
Interoperability Mechanics will depend on the
level of industrial physics worked into the process.
This includes the Gate, the Object in Glass and the
Elements that motivate and accentuate the
delivery of production in its staged and variated
aspects.
This, is why Financial Engineering takes on a new carriage in that it is no
longer using the ordinary transactional value of a book method, and it
begins to lose its binary state in lieu of the analog to digital correlation.
This meta translation loses its trial in the plait method of acquiring a pre-
plait and bifurcated arrangement at the foundational level of the work
(the field composition.)
While Glass is based on wave and particle duality it is
characterized by God as possessing a purely new Light
arrangement called the Rose Plait which no longer consists
of the atomic crystallography but a new elemental approach.
Rose Plait Methodology
1. Carries a Time and Motion standard with it
2. Permits its elemental resolution to be
discovered and utilized
3. Allows for foil and cascade, and other
motivational strategies to utilize layers of glass
compositions
4. Particles can be ‘portensed’ to carry the data
arrangements in tiny modules of glass allowing
for major increases in memory and storage of
intellectual and dynamic properties.
(Terminology will be applied.)
5. Glass takes on the shape of the project or the
object, and the multiple layers of it are a like a
stack of i^-phones communicating internally

Instancing to
Position
Predication
Brij Consulting, Jean Marshall 2/1/2021 21
For the purpose of
correlating the theory we
used interim numbers
here.. This is not precise
Next
paper
See our next paper for more details
The Song of Moses and the Lamb
1Then I saw another great and marvelous sign in heaven: seven angels with
the seven final plagues, with which the wrath of God is completed. 2And I
saw something like a sea of glass mixed with fire, beside which stood those
who had conquered the beast and its image and the number of its name. They
were holding harps from God, 3and they sang the song of God’s servant
Moses and of the Lamb: “Great and wonderful are Your works, O Lord God
Almighty! Just and true are Your ways, O King of the nations!…
God delivers the
Sevenfold Doctrine
of the New Creation
Science
154.1 +447
=561 x 2= 1122
+44 = 1166 see I
on slide 23
In its
Revealed
Form
Ability to point forward and
backward to instances w/ tooling

Ref I: T-Test of Data sets
T GAP
1
1 1
Wall Definition
Data with
annotated
observations
2
2
See Slide 8

DATA MAP
for GATE-I
9/24/2020 from Scorecard Integration Brij Consulting, Jean Marshall 23
N-map
REF. II Data N-Map
154.1 +447 =561 x 2= 1122
+44 = 1166 see I on slide 21,
Labor related metric
I

The Wall Test on Metric Standards
The Wall Test shows a perfect Bifurcation of the Middle Term indicating a plait test 24
T&M
Using the ‘Plait Proven Method’ we
derived for the Baseline we Tested
REF. III Test Extension
Original Wall Data for Wall Material and Cascade Derivation HERE

Notes: Our Emulation is a Data Plan
There is no labor conversion or transformation process on the Wall yet to
compare to the Ark Product Metric Standard approach. Yet the data configured
on the project appears to adhere well to the basis of approximating the Data Plan.
(404 -399.11 = 5.11 x2 = 1022 map)
Time and Motion or Motion Standards have a different methodology in determining whether the
performance characteristics of the mechanics are appropriate. In looking into Materials Science, it is often
important that a Solid Standard is produced in that you don’t want the composition to be subject to slide or
variation. In Financial Engineering we are often trying to produce Conversion to a Plan, and the numbers do
not become firm until the project is reported. It may become important to have code method for difference
in practice standards. We may find the position of the Standard affirms its use.
See Slide 10
Next
paper
Conversion is @ Gate
Data Here configured
for Process the -399 is
considered earn-back

Other Papers
https://www.slideshare.net/Marshallja/
presentations
2/5/2021 26
We hope to supply more papers of interest on the
topics related to Virtual Glass, Digital portal
development and Ark Sciences Our Methods changed
Be Aware!

Interpolative Scope V4 Justification of Prototypes

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Interpolative Scope V4 Justification of Prototypes

Similar to Interpolative Scope V4 Justification of Prototypes (20)

More from Brij Consulting, LLC

More from Brij Consulting, LLC (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Interpolative Scope V4 Justification of Prototypes