LOGO

New methodologies for assessing
“Emotional Perception” as a component
of Emotional Intelligence”

Edgar Breso, PhD.
@ebreso
Universitat Jaume I de Castelló
www.emotional-apps.com

ICEI 2013. New York, September 8-10 2013
Emotional Perception
Indicate how much of each emotion is expressed by
this face:

None

1

2

3

4

Happiness
Anger
Fear

5 Very Much
Contents

1

What is the problem

2

How is our proposal

3

What is the difference?

4

What is next?
www.emotional-apps.com

Problems of current surveys
v  Mostly related to the test development itself
but not to the theoretical model
§  Perception: assess the emotion elicited in the
observer instead of the emotion showed.
- There is no task for assessing the expression of
emotion
§  Use: connection between performance of these
tasks, and the “using emotion” abilities is not clear.
§  Managing: There is not enough evidence for
whether and how theoretical knowledge is related
to one’s actual ability to manage emotions
Further information: Maul, 2012
Contents

1
2
3
4

How is our proposal
Contents

1
2
3
4

What is the difference?
Apple store / Google Play

www.emtional-apps.com
ww.emotional-apps.com
www.emotional-apps.com
www.emotional-apps.com

What is the difference
MEIT

First “real MOBILE ability test”
Take advantage of DEVICES’ possibilities
More dynamic experience
Consider TiME

as a Variable

Bet/challenge users “gamification”
www.emotional-apps.com

CONCLUSIONS
v  MEIT is not an adaptation of MSCEIT, it is an
“evolution” in the EI assessment.
v  MEIT is still “under construction.” We have
already done a lot of work but we need your
feed-back to carry on the development and
improve the final result.
v  We are open to international projects and
collaborations with universities and/or
companies.
LOGO

New methodologies for assessing
“Emotional Perception” as a component
of Emotional Intelligence”

Edgar Breso, PhD.
@ebreso
Universitat Jaume I de Castelló
www.emotional-apps.com

ICEI 2013. New York, September 8-10 2013

International Conference EMotional INtelligence 2013 (New York City)

  • 1.
    LOGO New methodologies forassessing “Emotional Perception” as a component of Emotional Intelligence” Edgar Breso, PhD. @ebreso Universitat Jaume I de Castelló www.emotional-apps.com ICEI 2013. New York, September 8-10 2013
  • 3.
    Emotional Perception Indicate howmuch of each emotion is expressed by this face: None 1 2 3 4 Happiness Anger Fear 5 Very Much
  • 5.
    Contents 1 What is theproblem 2 How is our proposal 3 What is the difference? 4 What is next?
  • 6.
    www.emotional-apps.com Problems of currentsurveys v  Mostly related to the test development itself but not to the theoretical model §  Perception: assess the emotion elicited in the observer instead of the emotion showed. - There is no task for assessing the expression of emotion §  Use: connection between performance of these tasks, and the “using emotion” abilities is not clear. §  Managing: There is not enough evidence for whether and how theoretical knowledge is related to one’s actual ability to manage emotions Further information: Maul, 2012
  • 7.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Apple store /Google Play www.emtional-apps.com
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    www.emotional-apps.com What is thedifference MEIT First “real MOBILE ability test” Take advantage of DEVICES’ possibilities More dynamic experience Consider TiME as a Variable Bet/challenge users “gamification”
  • 14.
    www.emotional-apps.com CONCLUSIONS v  MEIT isnot an adaptation of MSCEIT, it is an “evolution” in the EI assessment. v  MEIT is still “under construction.” We have already done a lot of work but we need your feed-back to carry on the development and improve the final result. v  We are open to international projects and collaborations with universities and/or companies.
  • 15.
    LOGO New methodologies forassessing “Emotional Perception” as a component of Emotional Intelligence” Edgar Breso, PhD. @ebreso Universitat Jaume I de Castelló www.emotional-apps.com ICEI 2013. New York, September 8-10 2013