AN INTRODUCTION TO EXPENSE
     REDUCTION ANALYSTS


              Ted Leitch
Director – Central and Southeast Texas


   TLEITCH@EXPENSEREDUCTION.COM
     WWW.EXPENSEREDUCTION.COM
Who is ERA?
• A premier cost management consultancy which
  identifies and implements effective cost reduction
  strategies.


• We assist our clients in increasing their profitability
  through cost reduction while meeting their quality
  and operational requirements.


• We focus on non-core operating expenses (G&A).
  Savings goes directly to the bottom-line.


• We work on a contingent fee basis.

          Demonstrated Experience and Results
Our Profile
• Established in 1992.


• Over 700 consultants operating in more than 30
  countries.


• Greater than 14,000 projects completed world-
  wide.


• Average cost savings across all expense
  categories is 19.7%.


        Demonstrated Experience and Results
A Global
Cost Reduction
Consultancy
Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil
Canada Chile Colombia Cyprus Ecuador
Finland France Germany Greece Hungary
Ireland Italy Jordan Korea Luxembourg
Mexico Morocco Netherlands New Zealand
Panama Portugal Spain Switzerland United
Kingdom United States Uruguay
Some Key Clients




      Broad Industry Experience
Expense Categories – Non Core
 Couriers                      Office Products
 Factory Consumables           Packaging
 Fleet Management              Payroll Processing
 Food Services                 Print
 Fork Lift Services            Records Management
 Freight                       Telecommunications
 Information Technology        Temporary Labor
 Insurance                     Uniforms
 Janitorial Services           Utilities
 Laboratory Supplies           Waste Management
 Merchant Card Fees            Customer Specific


    Common Savings Opportunities for Businesses Worldwide
Why ERA?

   Best-In-Class Expertise
  Independent and Objective
     Transparent Process
 Strong Implementation Focus
  Contingency Fee Structure




We Implement. Not Just Recommend.
Cost reduction can be profitable
                                        20% Cost    Equivalent
                             Baseline
          Column1                       Reduction    In Sales

          Revenue            $ 100      $   100      $ 140
   Direct operating costs    $   35     $    35      $   49
        Labor costs          $   35     $    35      $   49
   Non-core indirect costs   $   20     $    16      $   28
         Net profit          $   10     $    14      $   14
      After tax (40%)        $     6    $      8    $      8
   Business Value = 6 P/E    $   36     $    48      $   48


 20% cost reduction = 40% increase in Net Profit
 $4M in expense savings = $40M revenue increase
Our Compensation

• Half of actual measured savings for 24 months
  after implementation
  • 10%  deposit of estimated savings paid upon
    acceptance of recommendation and 10% deposit paid
    upon implementation
  • Actual fee is billed monthly for the 24 months based
    on actual realized savings less a credit for amortizing
    the deposits




                    No Savings = No Fee
Client Case Studies - Examples
• Mortgage Company                • Cable Manufacturer
   • $1,000,000spend on small        • $1,500,000  spend on ground
    package freight and courier       freight - costs reduced by
    costs reduced by 16%              18.4% with incumbent vendor
    with incumbent vendor

• Architectural Firm              • Medical Charity
                                     • $105,000spend on telecom
   • $74,000 spend on office
    supplies costs reduced by         costs reduced by 51% with
    55% with leading new              incumbent vendor
    vendor

• Book Distributor                • Retailer
                                     • $763,000
                                              spend on
   • $108,000spend on                 telecommunications costs
    merchant card processing          reduced by 30% with leading
    costs reduced by 34%              new vendor
    with a new vendor
The ERA Process
                       Analyze                   Recommend                 Implement

Time
              3 – 4 weeks/category       3 – 4 weeks/category        24 months


              Define project scope and   Confirm business         Appoint supplier
              sign agreement             requirements
                                                                  Facilitate/assist
              Obtain financial data      Prepare RFP              implementation
              Obtain incumbent           Identify and meet        Measure actual
              supplier contracts         relevant suppliers       savings
Activities




              Understand volumes and     Manage bidding           Ongoing monitoring of
              activity                   process                  supplier relationship
                                                                  and contract terms
              Understand business        Benchmark costs and
              requirements with          assist in supplier
              stakeholders               selection
Deliverable




                                                                    Implementation
                     Baseline             Recommendations
                                                                   24 Month Savings
                      Report                   Report
                                                                       Reviews




                                                                10% of Total Savings/
Fees
ERA




                                                10% of
                       None                                        Balance Over
                                             Total Savings
                                                                    24 Months
Critical Success Factors


           High Level Project Sponsor
                       +
Communicate project goals to all key stakeholders
                      =
    Project “buy-in” across the organization



                  Find Extra Profit
Thank you for your time and interest.


              Ted Leitch
Director – Central and Southeast Texas


   TLEITCH@EXPENSEREDUCTION.COM
     WWW.EXPENSEREDUCTION.COM

Initial Meeting Presentation 1

  • 1.
    AN INTRODUCTION TOEXPENSE REDUCTION ANALYSTS Ted Leitch Director – Central and Southeast Texas TLEITCH@EXPENSEREDUCTION.COM WWW.EXPENSEREDUCTION.COM
  • 2.
    Who is ERA? •A premier cost management consultancy which identifies and implements effective cost reduction strategies. • We assist our clients in increasing their profitability through cost reduction while meeting their quality and operational requirements. • We focus on non-core operating expenses (G&A). Savings goes directly to the bottom-line. • We work on a contingent fee basis. Demonstrated Experience and Results
  • 3.
    Our Profile • Establishedin 1992. • Over 700 consultants operating in more than 30 countries. • Greater than 14,000 projects completed world- wide. • Average cost savings across all expense categories is 19.7%. Demonstrated Experience and Results
  • 4.
    A Global Cost Reduction Consultancy ArgentinaAustralia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Colombia Cyprus Ecuador Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Jordan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Morocco Netherlands New Zealand Panama Portugal Spain Switzerland United Kingdom United States Uruguay
  • 5.
    Some Key Clients Broad Industry Experience
  • 6.
    Expense Categories –Non Core  Couriers  Office Products  Factory Consumables  Packaging  Fleet Management  Payroll Processing  Food Services  Print  Fork Lift Services  Records Management  Freight  Telecommunications  Information Technology  Temporary Labor  Insurance  Uniforms  Janitorial Services  Utilities  Laboratory Supplies  Waste Management  Merchant Card Fees  Customer Specific Common Savings Opportunities for Businesses Worldwide
  • 7.
    Why ERA?  Best-In-Class Expertise  Independent and Objective  Transparent Process  Strong Implementation Focus  Contingency Fee Structure We Implement. Not Just Recommend.
  • 8.
    Cost reduction canbe profitable 20% Cost Equivalent Baseline Column1 Reduction In Sales Revenue $ 100 $ 100 $ 140 Direct operating costs $ 35 $ 35 $ 49 Labor costs $ 35 $ 35 $ 49 Non-core indirect costs $ 20 $ 16 $ 28 Net profit $ 10 $ 14 $ 14 After tax (40%) $ 6 $ 8 $ 8 Business Value = 6 P/E $ 36 $ 48 $ 48 20% cost reduction = 40% increase in Net Profit $4M in expense savings = $40M revenue increase
  • 9.
    Our Compensation • Halfof actual measured savings for 24 months after implementation • 10% deposit of estimated savings paid upon acceptance of recommendation and 10% deposit paid upon implementation • Actual fee is billed monthly for the 24 months based on actual realized savings less a credit for amortizing the deposits No Savings = No Fee
  • 10.
    Client Case Studies- Examples • Mortgage Company • Cable Manufacturer • $1,000,000spend on small • $1,500,000 spend on ground package freight and courier freight - costs reduced by costs reduced by 16% 18.4% with incumbent vendor with incumbent vendor • Architectural Firm • Medical Charity • $105,000spend on telecom • $74,000 spend on office supplies costs reduced by costs reduced by 51% with 55% with leading new incumbent vendor vendor • Book Distributor • Retailer • $763,000 spend on • $108,000spend on telecommunications costs merchant card processing reduced by 30% with leading costs reduced by 34% new vendor with a new vendor
  • 11.
    The ERA Process Analyze Recommend Implement Time 3 – 4 weeks/category 3 – 4 weeks/category 24 months Define project scope and Confirm business Appoint supplier sign agreement requirements Facilitate/assist Obtain financial data Prepare RFP implementation Obtain incumbent Identify and meet Measure actual supplier contracts relevant suppliers savings Activities Understand volumes and Manage bidding Ongoing monitoring of activity process supplier relationship and contract terms Understand business Benchmark costs and requirements with assist in supplier stakeholders selection Deliverable Implementation Baseline Recommendations 24 Month Savings Report Report Reviews 10% of Total Savings/ Fees ERA 10% of None Balance Over Total Savings 24 Months
  • 12.
    Critical Success Factors High Level Project Sponsor + Communicate project goals to all key stakeholders = Project “buy-in” across the organization Find Extra Profit
  • 13.
    Thank you foryour time and interest. Ted Leitch Director – Central and Southeast Texas TLEITCH@EXPENSEREDUCTION.COM WWW.EXPENSEREDUCTION.COM