This document summarizes copyright infringement under Indian law. It defines infringement as breaking copyright law, which causes economic loss to copyright owners. Direct copying, indirect copying, and substantial copying can all constitute infringement. The principles of determining infringement include conscious, unconscious, and subconscious copying. Several court cases dealing with copyright infringement in movies, songs, and books are summarized. Exceptions to infringement and the doctrine of fair dealing are explained. Finally, civil and criminal remedies for copyright infringement are outlined.
Copyright infringement is the use of works protected by copyright law without permission, infringing certain exclusive rights granted to the copyright holder, such as the right to reproduce, distribute, display or perform the protected work, or to make derivative works.
A detail discussion on Trademark law in India and landmark cases relating to trademark infringement, passing off action and remedies thereof have been discussed in this ppt. Illustrations have been provided wherever necessary for more understanding.
Copyright infringement is the use of works protected by copyright law without permission, infringing certain exclusive rights granted to the copyright holder, such as the right to reproduce, distribute, display or perform the protected work, or to make derivative works.
A detail discussion on Trademark law in India and landmark cases relating to trademark infringement, passing off action and remedies thereof have been discussed in this ppt. Illustrations have been provided wherever necessary for more understanding.
Indian Trademarks Act presentation with case study of
1. Amul vs Ichhamati Co-Operative Milk Producers Union Limited
2. SBL Limited v. Himalaya Drug Company
3. Colgate Pamolive Co vs Anchor Health and Beauty care
A copyright is a legal right given by the law to creators of literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works and producers of cinematography films and sound recordings. Business entities often copyright instruction manuals, product literature and user guides. Copyright is usually owned by the maker of the work, but may also be owned by the employer of its creator or the person who has authorized the work (unless there is an agreement to the contrary in either case).
The presentation deals with various aspects of the act of Copyright .
The presentation explains copyright, tenure of copyright, and the infringement of copyright.
A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination of words, phrases, symbols or designs, that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods of one party from those of others
The trademark owner can be an individual, business organization, or any legal entity. A trademark may be located on a package, a label, a voucher, or on the product itself. For the sake of corporate identity, trademarks are often displayed on company buildings.
compulsory licensing of patents in India how to get compulsory licensing in India, procedure, rights involved, act and sections,limitation of compulsory licensing, government rights for compulsory licensing,well good for law students
The above presentation is a step to simplify the concept of Trademark in India.It also focuses on the process of registration under the Trademarks Act 1999.
The presentation simplifies the steps involved and makes it easier to understand the same.
Note:-The following presentation is a general writing containing contents derived from basic knowledge and relevant books and articles.Also it is the original work of the writer.
What is the remedy available with you as a producer of a movie if your movie ...Tejaswinee Roychowdhury
Written while pursuing the NUJS MA in Business Laws (http://startup.nujs.edu/). A producer of a movie is the one with whom the copyright of the movie rests. In legal copyright terminology, a producer of a movie is the author of a cinematograph film and so his consent or licence is mandatory for a third party to put his work into any marketable / profitable use. So, what does a producer do when his movie is dubbed in a regional language without his consent? It is an obvious copyright infringement and the producer has legal remedies for his situation. But before we venture into the aspect of the remedies, let us do a comprehensive study on the matter.
Indian Trademarks Act presentation with case study of
1. Amul vs Ichhamati Co-Operative Milk Producers Union Limited
2. SBL Limited v. Himalaya Drug Company
3. Colgate Pamolive Co vs Anchor Health and Beauty care
A copyright is a legal right given by the law to creators of literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works and producers of cinematography films and sound recordings. Business entities often copyright instruction manuals, product literature and user guides. Copyright is usually owned by the maker of the work, but may also be owned by the employer of its creator or the person who has authorized the work (unless there is an agreement to the contrary in either case).
The presentation deals with various aspects of the act of Copyright .
The presentation explains copyright, tenure of copyright, and the infringement of copyright.
A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination of words, phrases, symbols or designs, that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods of one party from those of others
The trademark owner can be an individual, business organization, or any legal entity. A trademark may be located on a package, a label, a voucher, or on the product itself. For the sake of corporate identity, trademarks are often displayed on company buildings.
compulsory licensing of patents in India how to get compulsory licensing in India, procedure, rights involved, act and sections,limitation of compulsory licensing, government rights for compulsory licensing,well good for law students
The above presentation is a step to simplify the concept of Trademark in India.It also focuses on the process of registration under the Trademarks Act 1999.
The presentation simplifies the steps involved and makes it easier to understand the same.
Note:-The following presentation is a general writing containing contents derived from basic knowledge and relevant books and articles.Also it is the original work of the writer.
What is the remedy available with you as a producer of a movie if your movie ...Tejaswinee Roychowdhury
Written while pursuing the NUJS MA in Business Laws (http://startup.nujs.edu/). A producer of a movie is the one with whom the copyright of the movie rests. In legal copyright terminology, a producer of a movie is the author of a cinematograph film and so his consent or licence is mandatory for a third party to put his work into any marketable / profitable use. So, what does a producer do when his movie is dubbed in a regional language without his consent? It is an obvious copyright infringement and the producer has legal remedies for his situation. But before we venture into the aspect of the remedies, let us do a comprehensive study on the matter.
Intellectual property rights are customarily divided into two main areas:
(i) Copyright and rights related to copyright.back to top
The rights of authors of literary and artistic works (such as books and other writings, musical compositions, paintings, sculpture, computer programs and films) are protected by copyright, for a minimum period of 50 years after the death of the author.
Also protected through copyright and related (sometimes referred to as “neighbouring”) rights are the rights of performers (e.g. actors, singers and musicians), producers of phonograms (sound recordings) and broadcasting organizations. The main social purpose of protection of copyright and related rights is to encourage and reward creative work.
(ii) Industrial property.back to top
Industrial property can usefully be divided into two main areas:
One area can be characterized as the protection of distinctive signs, in particular trademarks (which distinguish the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings) and geographical indications (which identify a good as originating in a place where a given characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin).
The protection of such distinctive signs aims to stimulate and ensure fair competition and to protect consumers, by enabling them to make informed choices between various goods and services. The protection may last indefinitely, provided the sign in question continues to be distinctive.
Other types of industrial property are protected primarily to stimulate innovation, design and the creation of technology. In this category fall inventions (protected by patents), industrial designs and trade secrets.
The social purpose is to provide protection for the results of investment in the development of new technology, thus giving the incentive and means to finance research and development activities.
A functioning intellectual property regime should also facilitate the transfer of technology in the form of foreign direct investment, joint ventures and licensing.
The protection is usually given for a finite term (typically 20 years in the case of patents).
While the basic social objectives of intellectual property protection are as outlined above, it should also be noted that the exclusive rights given are generally subject to a number of limitations and exceptions, aimed at fine-tuning the balance that has to be found between the legitimate interests of right holders and of users.
Analysis of the issue of fair dealing : India TV vs YashRaj & Saregama vs Via...Nikhil Saraf
Analysis of the issue of Fair Dealing / fair use as not infringing the Copyright Act using the cases:
(1) Delhi High Court - Judgment 21st Aug, 2012 India TV Independent News Services Pvt. Ltd & Ors v Yasraj Films Pvt Ltd.
(2) Saregama India Ltd. v Viacom 18 Motion Pictures & Ors. (March 2013)
INTRODUCTION TO COPYRIGHT IN INDIA.pptxssuser87928e
The Copyright Act of 1957 was India’s first copyright law following independence, and six amendments have been made since then. The Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012, which was passed in 2012, was the most recent amendment.
Партнер практики IT и медиа права АО Юскутум Дмитрий Гадомский рассказал об авторском и о не-авторском, но от этого не менее важном, праве в кино. О договорах и договоренностях, о домыслах и расхожих заблуждениях, о защите авторских прав в интернете. Серьезные вопросы из мира большого кинематографа, и несерьезные, но крайне занимательные юридические фейлы в кино.
Case Study Vidding -- Free Expression or Copyright PiracyRead .docxtidwellveronique
Case Study: Vidding -- Free Expression or Copyright Piracy?
Read Discussion Case Vidding -- Free Expression or Copyright Piracy? In a one- to two-page paper (not including the title and reference pages) you must:
· Explain, using the ethical criteria introduced in Chapter 4 (utilitarianism, rights, and justice), if the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet are simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech, or if it is an infringement of intellectual property.
· Explain where to draw the line when using material found on the Internet, while trying to respect the artists’ intellectual property and rights to royalties from their creations.
· Describe how different a vid should be from the original source to justify that it is no longer the same material as the original artist created and thus not covered under the copyright laws.
You must use at least one scholarly source in addition to the text, and your paper must be formatted according to APA style guidelines.
“It’s on the Internet, publically available, so it must be free to be used.” “It is simply a way for me to express myself.” “It is totally different than what they created, it is mine now.” And so go the arguments to justify, ethically or legally, the increasing practice of vidding among young and old alike. This issue was so controversial that National Public Radio aired a one-hour feature on its show All Things Considered on February 25, 2009, to bring the differing opinions on vidding to light.
Vidding is the practice of creating new videos, sometimes called songvids or fanvids, which takes existing clips, usually from popular television shows, anime series, or music videos, and blends them with a song. It is a mix of narrative story telling and visual poetry. These new forms of entertainment or self-expression can be transferred to dif- ferent formats and made accessible on the computer and the Internet. While blossom- ing at a rapid pace, vidding raises serious ethical and legal questions regarding copyright protection versus free speech.
The first songvid is attributed to Kathy Fong, who at a Star Trek convention in 1975 showed a slide show of Leonard Nimoy (Dr. Spock on Star Trek, who often repressed his half-human side) singing a Joni Mitchell song. Fong said that she wanted to show Spock’s dual nature. More recently, vids often compile dozens of clips from various episodes of a television show or movie set to music. The band Good Charlotte, for example, edited gritty crime scenes from CSI: New York with their own mournful songover, saying they wanted to show the dangers faced by police on the show.
Some argue that vidding is really just free expression. “The media seem to think they own the things they’ve pumped into my brain in 27 years,” said British vidder Lim. “It seems to me ludicrous that television spends so much time and so much money care- fully colonizing my mind. But it is my mind.”
“Vidding is a way of seeing,” explained vidder Francesca Coppa, who i ...
Capacity Building Programme on Geographical Indications & Design Registration for Textile Engineers organized by Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law IIT Kharagpur
What is the threat to culture by a read-only world, and how do t.pdfforwardcom41
What is the threat to culture by a \"read-only world,\" and how do the CC licenses provided by
Lessig address this threat?
Solution
The primary argument against the current state of copyright is the length of copyright. As
stated above, the Constitution established copyright for a “limited period”. In the first one
hundred years of United States history, the term of copyright was increased once (to a 42 year
maximum). In the next fifty years, the term was increased once more (to a maximum of 56
years). In the past forty years, Congress has increased the terms of existing and future
copyrights; most recently, in 1998, Congress extended existing copyrights by twenty years
(Lessig Free Culture ).
This prevents many works from entering the “public domain” and becoming part of the
common culture. A good example of this is Walt Disney’s “Steamboat Willie”, the first
appearance of Mickey Mouse. Before the 1998 copyright amendments, “Steamboat Willie”
would have become public domain in 2003: now, it is under copyright until 2023, assuming the
law is not changed again. This is particularly ironic, given that Walt Disney and the Disney
corporation have made extensive use of “public domain” works (such as The Hunchback of
Notre Dame and Treasure Island) in their own production of derivative copyrighted works.
Indeed, “Steamboat Willie” is itself a parody of a contemporary Buster Keaton film, “Steamboat
Bill Jr.” (Lessig Free Culture )
“Fair use” is a controversial provision in copyright law because it is not clearly defined. The
U.S. Copyright Office states “The distinction between fair use and infringement may be unclear
and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be
taken without permission” (“Fair Use”). In practice, it is up to the user to defend his “fair use”
right and bear the legal costs of doing so. Jon Else, a documentary filmmaker, was quoted a
$10,000 fee to license four and a half seconds of a Simpsons episode that was playing in the
background of one scene in a documentary about opera. When he suggested that this was
covered under “fair use”, Fox (the copyright distributor) threatened to sue him, leading Else to
edit the scene .
In some cases, it is difficult or impossible to find the original copyright owner, especially
since copyright registration is no longer required. These works are commonly called “orphan
works”. Without permission, these works cannot be reprinted or redistributed, and disappear
from the culture. When Carnegie Mellon attempted to obtain permission to digitize works in
their libraries, they found that 22% of the publishers of those works could not be contacted
(“Report on Orphan”). If the owners or publishers of a work cannot be contacted, there is no
way
to reach an agreement on reprinting and reproduction rights. Without such an agreement, the
work in question will eventually become unavailable, except possibly through resellers of used
media or through illicit chann.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
1. COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957
Presentation
LLM Commercial Batch (2017-18)
Topic: Infringement of Copyright
CMR School Of Legal Studies
BY SHLISHA DEVADIGA AND SHWETA CHOUDHARY
2. MEANING: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Infringement is derived from the word Infringe which means break a law
or an agreement.
It leads to economic loss to the owners of copyright. Besides economic
loss, it also adversely affects creativity.
Section 51 of Copyright Act, 1957.
7. PRINCIPLES OF DETERMINING INFRINGEMENT
Direct Copying
Indirect Copying
Substantial copying
Substantial copying means copying major part of the author. Even if a part
copied it would lead to substantial copying if it is a very important part of the
author’s work.
Case: D Narayan Rao V. Prasad
Facts: Defendant had borrowed a part of the speech which was only two and
half minute duration in a three hour film.
Held: Court held that substantial part of the speech had been copied.
8. PRINCIPLES OF DETERMINING INFRINGEMENT
(CONTD..)
Conscious, unconscious and subconscious copying.
Conscious: has self knowledge.
Unconscious: No self knowledge.
Subconscious: Familiar with the work. Subconscious copying is
sufficient to constitute infringement.
9. WADIA MOVIE TONE PVT LTD V. VISHAL
BHARADWAJ(2017 CASE)
Facts: The movie ‘Hunterwali’ released in the year 1930s had copyright in a unique
character ‘Fearless Nadia’ a stuntwoman. The defendant produced another movie
‘Rangoon’ in the year 2016 starring Kangana Ranuat in the leading role with the character’s
name ‘Janbaaz Julie’ but they landed into a legal battle with the Wadias when they accused
of copyrighting the character ‘Janbaaz Julie’ from ‘Fearless Nadia’. The costume, the
character sketch, the style of walking, wearing a mask, a whip, being a stunt woman and
using the phrase ‘Bloody Hell’. Everything was copied from ‘Fearless Nadia’ character.`
Issue: Whether infringement of the character ‘Fearless Nadia’ took place???
Held: Court held that as there were substantial copying of the character, Rangoon of Vishal
Bharadwaj was accused of infringement was asked to pay bank Guarantee of two crores etc.
10. GHAJINI V. FUDGINI (2005 case)
Facts: The movie ‘Ghajini: Tamil’ released in the year 2005 where the main character suffered
from temporary memory loss and was out to get revenge for his wife’s murder. In the year
2008, a Hindi version of Ghajini was released where the character also suffered from short
term memory loss and was out for vengeance for his girlfriend’s murder. The only difference
was in latter movie, the girl was his girlfriend,
Issue: Whether the copyright of Ghajini: Tamil movie was infringed by the Hindi Version of the
movie?
Held: Court held that there were infringement and Interim injunction was ordered.
11. MILAN LUTHRIA V. GULSHAN RAI(2017)
Facts: The movie ‘Baadshaho’ released in the year 2017 and released a song called “Socha
Hai”. Before this movie, Deewar released the song ‘Keh doon tumhe’. The producers of
Baadshaho had remixed the song ‘Keh Doon Tumhe’ and made a new on one ‘Socha hai’.
The defendant claimed that they had remixed the song without their permission and it
was infringement of the song.
Issue: Whether the song ‘Socha hai’ lead to infringement of the original song ‘Keh Doon
Tumhe.’
Held: Court held that as there were infringement and injunction was ordered. The song
was removed from the movie.
12. PHONE BOOTH V. KNOCKOUT
Facts: In Phone Booth, a movie by Twentieth Century Fox, there was hostage in the
phone booth having major conversation with the sniper and the story also revolves
around extra marital affair. In Sohail Maklai’ Entertainment’s movie Knockout as well,
the story revolved around a hostage and the issue revolved around the issue of black
money with the zest of extra marital affair. Twentieth Century Fox filed a case against
Sohail Miklai for unlawful remake of the movie Phone Booth.
Issue: Whether the copyright of Phone Booth was infringed.
Held: In this case, the court held that it was copyright infringement and awarded
damages to Twentieth Century Fox.
13. ORIENT LONGMAN V. INDEREET ANANT 2005
Facts: The defendant reproduced the loose sheets of the
author’s work. The defendant contended that it was
reproduction of loose sheets and would not lead to
infringement. The plaintiff filed a case against the defendant
for infringement.
Issue: Whether the reproduction of the loose sheets
constitute to be an infringement.
Held: The court held that it would lead to infringement as it
was the work of author’s irrespective of it being loose sheets.
14. PERFORMING RIGHTS SOCIETY VS HAWTHRONS
Facts: The performance was open to any member of the public who
was prepared to be the guest of the hotel by either staying there or
dinning there.
Held: Infringement was established, as they tried earning profits by
inviting people for stay and dinner through a performance. Profits
was earned by defendants. The defendants infringes the copyright
when the public performance is made on payment.
15. MACMILLAN & CO. VS K.J COOPER
Facts: Plaintiff’s book consisted of selected passages by Plutarch’s life of Alexander
the great, joined together by few words to give a different appearance. The book
also contained introduction and notes useful for education. A similar book was
published by defendants with notes. The original work contained 40,000 words
while the defendants had copied 20,000 words and 7000 words in notes.
Issue: Whether the defendants work infringed the copyright in the plaintiff’s works?
Held: Defendants work infringed the copyright.
16. T-SERIES VS GURUJI.COM
T-SERIES VS GURUJI.COM
Facts: T- series is a top music label company and Guruji.com is an indigenously made
music search engine founded by two IIT graduates in 2006
• Guruji.com slowly gained popularity as pirated music search engine, it didn’t hold
any pirated music but it promoted pirated music through its homepage search
results. It was sharing mega data instead of only links.
They also displayed ads like Songs.pk
• 2008 T-series issued notice to Guruji.com
17. CONTD…
Where did the defendant go wrong? They didn’t maintain anonymity, other music
piracy websites have servers outside India/ outside Indian’s court purview
THE JUDGEMENT
•Defendant removed search links for music from its site
• Shut down music search site in 2011
• Arrest of Anurag Dod, CEO of Guruji.com
• Seizure of servers, storage media and other equipment • Arrest of employees of
Guruji.com
18. EXCEPTIONS TO INFRINGEMENT
private use, including research; criticism or review ,
reporting current events in any print media or
by broadcast or in a cinematographic film or by means of photographs,
reproduction for the purpose of a judicial proceeding or
of a report of a judicial proceeding;
the reading or recitation in public,
the publication in a collection,
the making of sound with owner’s consent,
reproduction or publication of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work
19. THE DOCTRINE OF FAIR DEALING
The term “fair dealing” has not been defined in the Act. It is a legal doctrine, which allows a
person to make limited use of copyrighted work without the permission of the owner.
The fair nature of the dealing depends on the following four factors:
1. the purpose of use
2.the nature of the work
3.the amount of the work used, and
4.the effect of use of the work on the original.
Certain changes were incorporated by way of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012. The
existing clause (1)(a) has been amended to provide fair dealing with any work for the
purposes of private and personal use with an exception that of a computer programme
20. REMEDIES AVAILABLE FOR INFRINGEMENT
Administrative : include detention of the infringing goods by the customs
authorities.
Civil:
• Injunction
• Pecuniary Remedies
• Anton Pillar Orders
• Mareva Injunction
• Norwich Pharmacal Order
21. REMEDIES AVAILABLE FOR INFRINGEMENT
Criminal :Imprisonment up to 3 years but, not less than 6
months
Fine which may not be less than 50,000 but, may extend
up to 2,00,000,
Search and seizure of infringing goods,
Delivery of infringing goods to the copyright owner
