Literature review

2. Peer Assessment in Architecture Education
Intent
The paper explores the role of
peer assessment in architecture
education, highlighting its
potential to improve student
learning and time management
for teachers. It also discusses
the scalability of peer
assessment in massive open
online courses (MOOCs).
Process
Experimental Setup:
The authors conducted an experiment involving 45 students from the
Lisbon University Institute’s Architecture IV course.
Two peer assessment sessions were held: one mid-semester and another at
the end of the semester.
During these sessions, students assessed each other’s architectural work.
Peer Assessment Mechanism: Students were assigned the task of
evaluating their peers’ architectural projects. They provided feedback on
aspects such as design, functionality, aesthetics, and overall quality. The
assessment criteria were predefined to ensure consistency.
Benefits of Peer Assessment:
Critical Thinking Development: Engaging in peer assessment
encouraged students to think critically about architectural designs. They
had to analyze and justify their evaluations.
Deeper Understanding: By assessing their peers’ work, students gained a
deeper understanding of architectural concepts and principles.
Feedback Loop: Peer assessment created a feedback loop where students
learned from each other’s strengths and weaknesses.
Scalability in Online Education:
The paper also explored the feasibility of implementing peer assessment
in massive open online courses (MOOCs).
MOOCs often have large student cohorts, making traditional instructor-
based assessment challenging.
Peer assessment could be a scalable solution, provided proper guidelines
and rubrics are in place.
Challenges and Considerations:
The authors acknowledged potential challenges, such as bias in peer
evaluations and the need for clear assessment criteria.
Addressing these challenges is crucial for successful implementation.
Implications for Architectural Education:
The study highlighted the value of peer assessment in fostering
architectural discourse.
It emphasized the importance of constructive feedback and the role it
plays in shaping future architects.
Conclusion
The paper concludes that
peer assessment is a
valuable feedback
mechanism for developing
critical thought processes
and architectural discourse,
and it shows promise for
application in online
education systems.