Presentation by Jeannine Ritchot, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Effective ex post Evaluation: Purpose and ChallengesOECD Governance
Presentation by Gary Banks, Chair of the Regulatory Policy Committee, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Regulatory Budgets and Stock-Flow Linkage RulesOECD Governance
Presentation by Nick Malyshev, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Administrative burdens created by the national transposition of EU legislationOECD Governance
Presentation by Professor Licínio Lopes Martins, Center for Studies in Public Law and Regulation, Faculty of Law of the University of Coimbra, Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Evaluation methods for improved policy outcomeOECD Governance
Presentation by Manuel Cabugueira, Legal Centre of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers (CEJUR), Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutionalising ex post Evaluation to Feed Back into the Regulatory ProcessOECD Governance
Presentation by Caroline Wigerstad, Better Regulation, Agency for Economic and Regional Growth, Sweden, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Engaging Stakeholders Effectively for a Targeted Approach in Evaluation OECD Governance
Presentation by Daniel Trnka and Tobias Querbach, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Processes and Institutions for Effective ex post EvaluationOECD Governance
Presentation by Nick Malyshev, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutionalising ex post Evaluation to Feed Back into the Regulatory Process OECD Governance
Presentation by Céline Kauffmann and Rebecca Schultz, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Effective ex post Evaluation: Purpose and ChallengesOECD Governance
Presentation by Gary Banks, Chair of the Regulatory Policy Committee, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Regulatory Budgets and Stock-Flow Linkage RulesOECD Governance
Presentation by Nick Malyshev, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Administrative burdens created by the national transposition of EU legislationOECD Governance
Presentation by Professor Licínio Lopes Martins, Center for Studies in Public Law and Regulation, Faculty of Law of the University of Coimbra, Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Evaluation methods for improved policy outcomeOECD Governance
Presentation by Manuel Cabugueira, Legal Centre of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers (CEJUR), Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutionalising ex post Evaluation to Feed Back into the Regulatory ProcessOECD Governance
Presentation by Caroline Wigerstad, Better Regulation, Agency for Economic and Regional Growth, Sweden, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Engaging Stakeholders Effectively for a Targeted Approach in Evaluation OECD Governance
Presentation by Daniel Trnka and Tobias Querbach, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Processes and Institutions for Effective ex post EvaluationOECD Governance
Presentation by Nick Malyshev, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutionalising ex post Evaluation to Feed Back into the Regulatory Process OECD Governance
Presentation by Céline Kauffmann and Rebecca Schultz, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Engaging stakeholders effectively for a targeted approach in evaluationOECD Governance
Presentation by Sara Piller European Commission, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Processes and institutions for effective ex post evaluationOECD Governance
Presentation by Ronnie Downes and Christine Arndt, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Policy impact evaluation: some notes and the challenge of joint effectsOECD Governance
Presentation by Bruno Damásio, ISEG - Universidade de Lisboa and NOVA IMS - Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Evaluation in Budgeting and Public ExpenditureOECD Governance
Presentation by Ronnie Downes, Budgeting and Public Expenditures Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Presentation by Maria Manuel Leitão Marques, Minister of the Presidency and Administrative Modernization, Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Presentation by Fernando Marta, Administrative Modernization Agency, Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Regulatory performance: the role of InstitutionsOECD Governance
Presentation by Prof. Gary Banks, Chair of the OECD Regulatory Policy Committee and Dean of the Australia and New Zealand School of Government, Australia, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Evaluation of regulations and beyond -- Christiane Arndt, OECD SecretariatOECD Governance
Presentation by Christiane Arndt, OECD Secretariat, at the 11th annual meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance and Results network, OECD, 26-27 November 2015.
Developing a More Systematic Approach to Evaluation Across Policy InstrumentsOECD Governance
Presentation by Knut Klepsvik, Ministry of Finance, Norway, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the regulatory cycle: effective ex post evaluation for improved policy outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutional Frameworks for ex ante and ex post EvaluationOECD Governance
Presentation by Ms Celine Kauffmann, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, Breakout Session 2, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at ww.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Policy evaluation in the Netherlands -- Birgit ten Cate - NetherlandsOECD Governance
Presentation by Birgit ten Cate, Netherlands, at the 11th annual meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance and Results network, OECD, 26-27 November 2015.
Presentation by Dr Jenny Gordon, Principal Adviser Research, Productivity Commission Australia, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Presentation by Australia's Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutional Frameworks for Inclusive Regulation-MakingOECD Governance
Presentation by Ms Lisa Elliston, Portfolio Strategies and Land branch, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES), Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Australia, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, Breakout Session 3, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Presentation by Australia's Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutional Frameworks for Evidence-Based Regulatory Policy-Making OECD Governance
Presentation by Nick Malyshev and Rebecca Schultz, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutional Framework for Regulatory Policy in GermanyOECD Governance
Presentation by Stephan Naundorf, Counsellor of Minister of State Helge Braun and Representative of the Better Regulation Office, Federal Chancellery, Germany, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Evaluation and the budget - the role of SAIs -- Leonardo Albernaz, BrazilOECD Governance
Presentation by Leonardo Albernaz, Brazil, at the 11th annual meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance and Results network, OECD, 26-27 November 2015
Evaluating the performance of OECD Committees -- Kevin Williams, OECD Secreta...OECD Governance
Presentation by Kevin Williams, OECD Secretariat, at the 11th annual meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance and Results network, OECD, 26-27 November 2015
8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Rol...OECD Governance
Agenda of the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Engaging stakeholders effectively for a targeted approach in evaluationOECD Governance
Presentation by Sara Piller European Commission, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Processes and institutions for effective ex post evaluationOECD Governance
Presentation by Ronnie Downes and Christine Arndt, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Policy impact evaluation: some notes and the challenge of joint effectsOECD Governance
Presentation by Bruno Damásio, ISEG - Universidade de Lisboa and NOVA IMS - Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Evaluation in Budgeting and Public ExpenditureOECD Governance
Presentation by Ronnie Downes, Budgeting and Public Expenditures Division, OECD, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Presentation by Maria Manuel Leitão Marques, Minister of the Presidency and Administrative Modernization, Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Presentation by Fernando Marta, Administrative Modernization Agency, Portugal, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the Regulatory Cycle: Effective ex post Evaluation for Improved Policy Outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Regulatory performance: the role of InstitutionsOECD Governance
Presentation by Prof. Gary Banks, Chair of the OECD Regulatory Policy Committee and Dean of the Australia and New Zealand School of Government, Australia, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Evaluation of regulations and beyond -- Christiane Arndt, OECD SecretariatOECD Governance
Presentation by Christiane Arndt, OECD Secretariat, at the 11th annual meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance and Results network, OECD, 26-27 November 2015.
Developing a More Systematic Approach to Evaluation Across Policy InstrumentsOECD Governance
Presentation by Knut Klepsvik, Ministry of Finance, Norway, at the 9th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance - Closing the regulatory cycle: effective ex post evaluation for improved policy outcomes which took place in Lisbon on 20-21 June 2017. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutional Frameworks for ex ante and ex post EvaluationOECD Governance
Presentation by Ms Celine Kauffmann, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, Breakout Session 2, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at ww.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Policy evaluation in the Netherlands -- Birgit ten Cate - NetherlandsOECD Governance
Presentation by Birgit ten Cate, Netherlands, at the 11th annual meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance and Results network, OECD, 26-27 November 2015.
Presentation by Dr Jenny Gordon, Principal Adviser Research, Productivity Commission Australia, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Presentation by Australia's Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutional Frameworks for Inclusive Regulation-MakingOECD Governance
Presentation by Ms Lisa Elliston, Portfolio Strategies and Land branch, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES), Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Australia, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, Breakout Session 3, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Presentation by Australia's Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutional Frameworks for Evidence-Based Regulatory Policy-Making OECD Governance
Presentation by Nick Malyshev and Rebecca Schultz, Regulatory Policy Division, OECD, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Institutional Framework for Regulatory Policy in GermanyOECD Governance
Presentation by Stephan Naundorf, Counsellor of Minister of State Helge Braun and Representative of the Better Regulation Office, Federal Chancellery, Germany, at the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
Evaluation and the budget - the role of SAIs -- Leonardo Albernaz, BrazilOECD Governance
Presentation by Leonardo Albernaz, Brazil, at the 11th annual meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance and Results network, OECD, 26-27 November 2015
Evaluating the performance of OECD Committees -- Kevin Williams, OECD Secreta...OECD Governance
Presentation by Kevin Williams, OECD Secretariat, at the 11th annual meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance and Results network, OECD, 26-27 November 2015
8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Rol...OECD Governance
Agenda of the 8th Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Realising Impact: The Role of Institutional Frameworks in Regulatory Policy, which took place in Sydney 15-16 June 2016. Further information is available at www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm.
This presentation was made by Marine Camiade, France, at the 12th Annual Meeting of OECD-Asian Senior Budget Officials held in Bangkok, Thailand, on 15-16 December 2016
Italy's Tax Administration: OECD Review of Institutional and Organisational A...OECDtax
A presentation summarising the key findings and recommendations contained in the report "Italy's Tax Administration: OECD Review of Institutional and Organisational Aspects". http://bit.ly/29ONOet
As today's not-for-profit organizations shift from being purely mission focused to operating more “like a business,” certain core principles and fundamentals apply to both. To wit, it is vital for audit committee members to stay ahead of relevant changes to legal and regulatory requirements in this challenging environment. Take a look.
This presentation by Gioia de Melo (OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration) was delivered during the launch of the OECD Investment Policy Review of Uruguay on 12 July 2021.
Find out more at: https://www.oecd.org/investment/oecd-investment-policy-reviews-uruguay-1135f88e-en.htm
Session by Raffaele Russo, Head, BEPS Project, OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, Meeting of the OECD Parliamentary Group on Tax, 19 Oct 2015
OECD Regulatory Policy Review of Korea 2017 - Key FindingsOECD Governance
OECD Regulatory Policy Review of Korea - Key Findings. Presentation at the launch of the report by Faisal Naru & Filippo Cavassini. www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy-in-korea-9789264274600-en.htm
OECD Regulatory Policy Review of Korea - Key FindingsJustin Kavanagh
OECD Regulatory Policy Review of Korea - Key Findings. Presentation at the launch of the report by Faisal Naru & Filippo Cavassini. www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy-in-korea-9789264274600-en.htm
Fisconti Tax Consulting Netherlands - New Transfer Pricing Documentation requ...Guido Van Asperen
In the Netherlands new transfer pricing documentation rules are introduced. They will have an impact on companies with a global consolidated turnover of € 50 million
Fisconti tax consulting Netherlands - New Transfer Pricing Documentation Req...Guido Van Asperen
New Transfer Pricing Documentation Requirements have been introduced in the Netherlands in 2016. If you are part of a multinational with a turnover of at least € 50 million, these rules will generally be relevant to you. We provide a pratical approach avoiding duplication of work, considering similar requirements in other countries.
International Tax Planning after BEPS - A Country SpotlightTIAG_Alliance
The OECD initiative against “Base Erosion and Profit Shifting” was
commissioned by the G-20 in 2013. Final deliverables were presented to the G-20 in November 2015.
“Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) refers to tax planning strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules to artificially shift profits to low or no-tax locations where there is little or no economic activity, resulting in little or no overall corporate tax being paid. BEPS is of major significance for developing countries due to their heavy reliance on corporate income tax, particularly from multinational enterprises (MNEs.)”
Creators and Presenters:
• Russell Brown, LehmanBrown, China
• Florence Bastin, Fiduciaire du Grand-Duché de
Luxembourg S.à r.l. (FLUX)
• Fabrice Rymarz, Racine, France
• Simone Hennessy, HSOC, Ireland
• Fuad Saba, FGMK, Chicago, USA (Moderator)
This presentation was made by Sandra Kaiser, Austria, at the 18th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Financial Management and Reporting Officials held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 1-2 March 2018
Similar to Implementing the One-for-One Rule: Background, Mechanics, Results and Lessons (20)
Summary of the OECD expert meeting: Construction Risk Management in Infrastru...OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
Using AI led assurance to deliver projects on time and on budget - D. Amratia...OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
ECI in Sweden - A. Kadefors, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (SE)OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
Building Client Capability to Deliver Megaprojects - J. Denicol, professor at...OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
Procurement strategy in major infrastructure: The AS-IS and STEPS - D. Makovš...OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
Procurement of major infrastructure projects 2017-22 - B. Hasselgren, Senior ...OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
ECI Dutch Experience - A. Chao, Partner, Bird&Bird & J. de Koning, Head of Co...OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
ECI in Sweden - A. Kadefors, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmOECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
EPEC's perception of market developments - E. Farquharson, Principal Adviser,...OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
Geographical scope of the lines in Design and Build - B.Dupuis, Executive Dir...OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
Executive Agency of the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management...OECD Governance
Presented at the OECD expert meeting "Construction Risk Management in Infrastructure Procurement: The Loss of Appetite for Fixed-Price Contracts", held on 17 May 2023 at the OECD, Paris and online.
Presentation of OECD Government at a Glance 2023OECD Governance
Paris, 30 June, 2023
Presentation by Elsa Pilichowski, Director for Public Governance, OECD.
The 2023 edition of Government at a Glance provides a comprehensive overview of public governance and public administration practices in OECD Member and partner countries. It includes indicators on trust in public institutions and satisfaction with public services, as well as evidence on good governance practices in areas such as the policy cycle, budgeting, procurement, infrastructure planning and delivery, regulatory governance, digital government and open government data. Finally, it provides information on what resources public institutions use and how they are managed, including public finances, public employment, and human resources management. Government at a Glance allows for cross-country comparisons and helps identify trends, best practices, and areas for improvement in the public sector.
See: https://www.oecd.org/publication/government-at-a-glance/2023/
The Protection and Promotion of Civic Space: Strengthening Alignment with Int...OECD Governance
Infographics from the OECD report "The Protection and Promotion of Civic Space Strengthening Alignment with International Standards and Guidance".
See: https://www.oecd.org/gov/the-protection-and-promotion-of-civic-space-d234e975-en.htm
OECD Publication "Building Financial Resilience
to Climate Impacts. A Framework for Governments to manage the risks of Losses and Damages.
Governments are facing significant climate-related risks from the expected increase in frequency and intensity of cyclones, floods, fires, and other climate-related extreme events. The report Building Financial Resilience to Climate Impacts: A Framework for Governments to Manage the Risks of Losses and Damages provides a strategic framework to help governments, particularly those in emerging market and developing economies, strengthen their capacity to manage the financial implications of climate-related risks. Published in December 2022.
OECD presentation "Strengthening climate and environmental considerations in infrastructure and budget appraisal tools"
by Margaux Lelong and Ana Maria Ruiz during the 9th Meeting of the OECD Paris Collaborative on Green Budgeting held on 17 and 18 of April 2023 in Paris.
OECD presentation "Building Financial Resilience to Climate Impacts. A Framework to Manage the Risks of Losses and Damages" by Andrew Blazey, Stéphane Jacobzone and Titouan Chassagne. Presented during the 9th Meeting of the OECD Paris Collaborative on Green Budgeting held on 17 and 18 of April 2023 in Paris
OECD Presentation "Financial reporting, sustainability information and assurance" by Peter Welch during the 5th Session during the 9th Meeting of the OECD Paris Collaborative on Green Budgeting held on 17 and 18 of April 2023 in Paris
Presentation "Developments in sovereign green bond markets" by Ms. Fatos Koc during the 4th Session of 9th Meeting of the OECD Paris Collaborative on Green Budgeting held on 17 and 18 of April 2023 in Paris.
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Implementing the One-for-One Rule: Background, Mechanics, Results and Lessons
1. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
Implementing the One-for-One Rule
Background, mechanics, results and lessons
1
Regulatory Affairs Sector
February 2017
2. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
2
Background: Origin of the One-for-One Rule
The Red Tape Reduction Commission (RTRC) set up in 2011 to provide advice to the
Government of Canada on how to reduce “red tape” on business
– There were then about 2,600 federal regulations in place
The RTRC concluded:
– The total administrative burden of existing regulations and regulatory program
activities is too large (and regulators are unaware of it)
– Although the existing stock of regulatory requirements is the main problem,
administrative burden continues to increase with every new regulation and its
associated program and activities
The RTRC recommended:
– Legislate a One-for-One Rule to reduce regulatory administrative burden
– Every time the Government proposes a new regulation with administrative burden, it
must eliminate at least one existing regulation as well as the equivalent costs in
administrative burden so as to ensure a zero net sum approach
The Rule was implemented as a policy in 2012 and legislated in 2015
3. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
3
Background: How the Rule works
Control the growth of administrative burden cost
– New administrative costs imposed must be offset, within 24 months (required by
legislation), by a reduction in administrative costs from the existing stock of
regulations within a portfolio (required by policy)
Control the growth of the volume of regulations
– Each time a new regulation is introduced that imposes new administrative burden
on business, an existing one, within a portfolio, must be removed within 24 months
Exempt selected categories of regulations where compliance would compromise
public safety, health or the economy
– Exemptions cover three categories of regulations: tax administration; international
or legal obligations; and emergency, unique or exceptional circumstances
Report on performance and assess departmental compliance with the Rule
– The President of the Treasury Board must make public each year a report on the
application of the Rule
– The Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) annually assesses departments and agencies
on compliance with reconciliation and reporting requirements under the Rule
4. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
4
Four years after: 32 less regulations, $30M less in burden
Implementation of the One-for-One Rule: performance statistics
2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 Total
Number of regulations with one-for-one
implications (titles, burden, exemptions)
27 36 58 30 151
Total number of new or amended
regulations
303 270 328 232 1,133
Share of regulations affected by the Rule 9% 13% 18% 13% 13%
Total administrative burden saved
annually ($ millions, rounded)
$3.00 $18.00 $2.70 $6.30 $30.00
Net number of regulations reduced 5 14 1 12 32
Regulations exempted from the Rule 9 7 30 11 57
Departmental compliance results and system-wide benefits of the rule
– Excellent compliance with One-for-One reporting and reconciliation requirements
– Compliance with reconciliation requirements: 1 case of non-compliance since 2012
– Stating assumptions & describing consultation activities on burden estimates is an issue
– The Rule created an opportunity and a mechanism for cleaning up the regulatory stock
– The Rule increased awareness about the need to minimize administrative burden
– The Rule provided a measure of incremental regulatory administrative burden cost/relief
– Anecdotal evidence of cultural change i.e., redesigning regulations to minimize
administrative burden cost
5. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
5
Challenges and lessons learned
Benefits Disadvantages
- Provides strong incentive to regulators to
eliminate obsolete regulations
- Leads regulators to adopt design that more
effectively manages burden
- Provides a mechanism to identify
regulations that need to be amended
- Generally limited to the impact on a single
category of stakeholders (i.e. business)
- Focus on costs and not on benefits
- Long term sustainability is in question
• Consider the burden to ALL stakeholders (i.e. consumers, governments, NGOs)
• Accept that burden must be imposed. Make it the goal to MINIMIZE burden for
effective benefits rather than to ELIMINATE burden.
• Adopt flexible regulatory designs that reduce burden
• Adopt flexible reconciliation mechanisms (i.e. government-wide vs. portfolio
approach)
• Allow banking so that there is a steady source of outs so that when a new regulation
must be brought in for a compelling public policy reason, there are sufficient outs.
How to use an in-out rule more effectively
6. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
6
Conclusion
• Canada’s One-for-One rule was not conceived as a tool to conduct ex-
post evaluation
• It was a political initiative specifically targeting reduction of
administrative burden on Canadian business
• Nonetheless, the One-for-One rule has had certain ex-post’esque
results:
• Departments have used the rule to eliminate regulations that are
out of date or to evaluate which regulations require amendments
• Costing administrative cost forces Departments to consider
implementation impacts in the design up front
• Additional mechanisms in our federal system to complete evaluation
of regulation:
• Standing Joint Committee on Scrutiny of Regulations;
• Program-level evaluations under Canada’s Policy on Results
8. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
8
Key definitions
Administrative burden
– Administrative burden means anything that is necessary to demonstrate
compliance with a regulation, including the collecting, processing, reporting and
retaining of information and the completing of forms
Business
– An enterprise that operates in Canada and engages in commercial activities related
to the supply of services or property (which includes goods)
– A business does not include an organization that engages in activities for a public
purpose (i.e., social welfare or civic improvement), such as a provincial or
municipal government, a school, a college or university, or a hospital or charity
Regulatory change
– A regulatory change is defined as a new regulation, an amendment to an existing
regulation, or removal of an existing regulation
9. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
9
Background: The Red Tape Reduction Commission
The Red Tape Reduction Commission launched on January 2011:
– Consulted businesses across Canada from December 2010 to March 2011
– Produced the “What was heard report” in September 2011
– Produced its recommendations in January 2012
The RTRC examined multiple potential sources of red tape:
– Reducing administrative burden
– Improving service by Government
– Enhancing coordination and cooperation
– Addressing specific needs of small business
– Addressing cumulative burden i.e. burden originating from multiple regulators
Leading to multiple regulatory reform initiatives including:
– The one-for-one rule
– The small business lens
– The administrative burden baseline
– The service standards
– Interpretation policies
– Forward regulatory plans
11. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
11
Reliable administration requires strong infrastructure
NO
TBS-RAS Cabinet
Operations challenge
Title
or Admin
Burden
YES
Applicabilityand
burdenestimates
Assessment/
reporting
Tracking
Report in one-for-
one section of RIAS
Reconciliation
RAS check-up
report to ADMs
RAS check-up
report to DMs
One-for-one
balance statement
Deficit
(title/burden)
NO
Continue
tracking /
monitoring
YES
ReconciledNO
YES
TBS briefs TB ministers. Minister
appears before TB. TB decides on
next steps to ensure reconciliation
including refusal to approve other
minister’s GIC regulations
Stop
Stop
Triage
Consult on
estimates
Enter into burden
and tracking
database
Use RCC to
estimate burden –
track titles
Meet reporting
criteria
Assess compliance
reporting and
reconciliation
RAS monitors reconciliation
look-ahead plan
implementation
RAS sends reconciliation
look-ahead requests to
departments
Cross-check with
departmental
internal data
12. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
12
Administrative burden cost is central to the Rule
Administrative
burden cost
Population Frequency
Wage Time
Wage costs plus
overhead for
administrative activities
done internally or
hourly cost for external
service providers
The amount of time
(in hours) required
to complete the
administrative
activity
The number of times
that the activity must
be completed each
year
Number of businesses
required to carry out
the administrative
activity
The Standard Cost Model (SCM) is used to estimate the cost of each
administrative burden activity as wage*time*frequency*number of businesses
13. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
13
Need for standardized estimation and reporting of burden
To ensure credible and comparable estimates, the approach to calculating administrative
burden cost on business is standardized
– Departments and agencies must use the Standard Cost Model (SCM)
– Use of the Regulatory Cost Calculator, a tool developed by TBS, is mandatory
– The list of what is considered administrative burden activities is provided
– Administrative burden must be estimated over a ten-year period
– The discount rate is set at 7%
– The present value base year is 2012
– Departments and agencies must report the annualized value
Reporting of the administrative burden costs is also standardized and made publicly
available in Canada Gazette I (consultation/pre-publication) and Canada Gazette II (final):
– Departments and agencies must report their estimates in the One-for-One section of the
Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS)
– Departments and agencies must report the annualized value of the administrative burden cost
estimates
– Departments must state the assumptions underlying the administrative burden cost estimates
– Departments must describe consultations activities on the administrative burden cost
estimates
14. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
14
Assessing compliance with the Rule
Measure 1: Reconciliation of regulatory titles and administrative burden cost
Titles are reconciled within 24 months following the registration of the regulations 1 point
Administrative burden cost is reconciled within 24 months following the registration 1 point
Measure 3: Reporting requirements for exemptions in Canada Gazette, Part II
Statement on application of the rule to the regulatory change (CGII) 1 point
The reason for the exemption is stated in the RIAS (CGII) 1 point
Measure 2: Administrative burden reporting requirements in Canada Gazette, Part II
Statement on application of the rule to the regulatory change 1 point
Summary of administrative burden costs estimates 1 point
Costing assumptions reported 1 point
Regulatory Cost Calculator completed and submitted 1 point
A description of consultation activities, including stakeholder feedback on the
department’s estimates of administrative burden costs or savings to business included
in CG II RIAS
1 point
A One for-One summary sheet (Appendix D) is submitted to TBS-RAS 1 point
2
0
1
2
0
1
5-6
0-2
3-4
15. UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
15
One-for-One reference material
Policy and legal documents
– Red Tape Reduction Action Plan
– Cabinet Directive on Regulatory Management
– Controlling Administrative Burden That Regulations Impose on Business: Guide for
the one-for-one Rule
– Red Tape Reduction Act
– Red Tape Reduction Regulations
Implementation reports
– 2012-2015 annual scorecard reports
– 2015-2016 Annual report: reducing regulatory administrative burden and
improving service and predictability
Red Tape Reduction Commission reports
– What Was Heard - Red Tape Reduction Commission
– Recommendations Report - Cutting Red Tape…Freeing Business to Grow