This document summarizes an upcoming virtual meeting of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). The meeting will discuss the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the efficiency of justice systems and the functioning of courts. It will examine issues like balancing efficiency and fair trial principles during the crisis, the use of new technologies, court user information, and safety of justice professionals. The meeting will also explore lessons learned from the pandemic and challenges going forward, such as managing case backlogs and developing videoconferencing. Participants will discuss these topics with the goal of adopting a CEPEJ Declaration with recommendations.
Commemoration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the adoption of the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court
United Nations Headquarters, New York - 17 July 2023 -
Draft Programme
The future of the protection of social rights in Europe - The « Brussels Doc...FPS Social Security
On 12 and 13 February 2015, the Belgian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe organised in Brussels the European Conference on “The future of the protection of social rights in Europe”. 31 independent academic experts present during these 2 days prepared a synthesis document summing up the main proposals and possible solutions, which is called the “Brussels Document” on social rights in the greater European area.
The Brussels Document, which has been drawn up by a group of independent and international academic experts, is now available in attachment in 4 languages (EN-FR-DE-NL) and hosted on the Council of Europe website dedicated to the Turin process : http://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/high-level-conference-esc-2014
Following up on the October 2014 Turin Conference, it is the result of the “Conference on the Future of the Protection of Social Rights in Europe”, organised on 12 and 13 February 2015 in Brussels within the framework of the Belgian Presidency of the Council of Europe. Following the Turin Process, and in the wake of the General Report of the Conference of the eponymous city, the “Brussels Document” supplements the legal analyses and develops reflections for an application in synergy with the European Treaties.
Commemoration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the adoption of the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court
United Nations Headquarters, New York - 17 July 2023 -
Draft Programme
The future of the protection of social rights in Europe - The « Brussels Doc...FPS Social Security
On 12 and 13 February 2015, the Belgian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe organised in Brussels the European Conference on “The future of the protection of social rights in Europe”. 31 independent academic experts present during these 2 days prepared a synthesis document summing up the main proposals and possible solutions, which is called the “Brussels Document” on social rights in the greater European area.
The Brussels Document, which has been drawn up by a group of independent and international academic experts, is now available in attachment in 4 languages (EN-FR-DE-NL) and hosted on the Council of Europe website dedicated to the Turin process : http://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/high-level-conference-esc-2014
Following up on the October 2014 Turin Conference, it is the result of the “Conference on the Future of the Protection of Social Rights in Europe”, organised on 12 and 13 February 2015 in Brussels within the framework of the Belgian Presidency of the Council of Europe. Following the Turin Process, and in the wake of the General Report of the Conference of the eponymous city, the “Brussels Document” supplements the legal analyses and develops reflections for an application in synergy with the European Treaties.
PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...Save Dolphins
The final PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Monsanto, Dow, Dupont, and BASF is now available... PAN International organised a historic session of the Permanent People’s Tribunal in Bangalore on December 3-6, 2012, attended by hundreds of peasant farmers, agricultural workers, and activists. Witnesses from all over the world gave testimony on the human rights violations perpetrated by the agrochemical transnational corporations (TNCs). Below is a brief summary of the Tribunal’s Findings and Recommendations.
Tribunal Findings:
The six TNCs are responsible for gross, widespread and systematic violations of the right to health and life, economic, social and cultural rights, as well as of civil and political rights, and women and children’s rights.
The United States, Switzerland, and Germany (Home States), have demonstrably failed to comply with their internationally accepted responsibility to promote and protect human rights, especially of vulnerable populations. These three States, where the six corporations are registered and headquartered, have failed to adequately regulate, monitor and discipline these entities by national laws and policy; have unjustifiably promoted a double standard approach prohibiting the production of hazardous chemicals at home while allowing their own TNCs unrestrained license for these enterprises in other States, especially of the Global South.
Technology-importing (Host) states are responsible for not adequately protecting human rights and social movement activists from vexation and harassment; not adequately protecting independent scientists; not fully pursuing alternatives and less hazardous forms of agricultural production; and not honouring obligations from the ILO Conventions.
Some of the policies of the WHO, FAO and ILO are not fully responsive to the urgency of regulation and redress, as articulated by suffering peoples, and human rights and social movement activist groups and associations. A more proactive role is especially indicated in the field of hazardous agrochemicals and agribusiness TNCs. UNESCO ought to take expeditious and effective steps for the protection of academic and scientific freedom of researchers and specialists who raise justifiable alarm over the long term impact of pesticides.
Quality of translation and interpretation from the perspective of the defenceNicola Canestrini
Procedural rights in the EU: status quo and need for further measure, session on Directive 2010/64 EU on the right to interpretation and translation, ERA, Lisbon 27-28 February 2020
The European Union’s Foreign Policy under the Lisbon Treaty: a priority on
Conflict Prevention, Crisis Management and Peace-Building
Marc Van Bellinghen
Deputy Head of Unit, EEAS
Conflict Prevention , Peace Building & Mediation
“COVİD-19” PANDEMİYASI ƏRZİNDƏ VƏ SONRAKI DÖVR ÜÇÜN ƏDALƏT MÜHAKİMƏSİ SİSTEML...Khayyam Bayramov, LLM
“COVİD-19” PANDEMİYASI ƏRZİNDƏ VƏ SONRAKI DÖVR ÜÇÜN ƏDALƏT MÜHAKİMƏSİ SİSTEMLƏRİ QARŞISINDA DURAN PROBLEMLƏR VƏ
ƏLDƏ OLUNAN NƏTİCƏLƏR BARƏDƏ CEPEJ XARTİYASI
PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...Save Dolphins
The final PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Monsanto, Dow, Dupont, and BASF is now available... PAN International organised a historic session of the Permanent People’s Tribunal in Bangalore on December 3-6, 2012, attended by hundreds of peasant farmers, agricultural workers, and activists. Witnesses from all over the world gave testimony on the human rights violations perpetrated by the agrochemical transnational corporations (TNCs). Below is a brief summary of the Tribunal’s Findings and Recommendations.
Tribunal Findings:
The six TNCs are responsible for gross, widespread and systematic violations of the right to health and life, economic, social and cultural rights, as well as of civil and political rights, and women and children’s rights.
The United States, Switzerland, and Germany (Home States), have demonstrably failed to comply with their internationally accepted responsibility to promote and protect human rights, especially of vulnerable populations. These three States, where the six corporations are registered and headquartered, have failed to adequately regulate, monitor and discipline these entities by national laws and policy; have unjustifiably promoted a double standard approach prohibiting the production of hazardous chemicals at home while allowing their own TNCs unrestrained license for these enterprises in other States, especially of the Global South.
Technology-importing (Host) states are responsible for not adequately protecting human rights and social movement activists from vexation and harassment; not adequately protecting independent scientists; not fully pursuing alternatives and less hazardous forms of agricultural production; and not honouring obligations from the ILO Conventions.
Some of the policies of the WHO, FAO and ILO are not fully responsive to the urgency of regulation and redress, as articulated by suffering peoples, and human rights and social movement activist groups and associations. A more proactive role is especially indicated in the field of hazardous agrochemicals and agribusiness TNCs. UNESCO ought to take expeditious and effective steps for the protection of academic and scientific freedom of researchers and specialists who raise justifiable alarm over the long term impact of pesticides.
Quality of translation and interpretation from the perspective of the defenceNicola Canestrini
Procedural rights in the EU: status quo and need for further measure, session on Directive 2010/64 EU on the right to interpretation and translation, ERA, Lisbon 27-28 February 2020
The European Union’s Foreign Policy under the Lisbon Treaty: a priority on
Conflict Prevention, Crisis Management and Peace-Building
Marc Van Bellinghen
Deputy Head of Unit, EEAS
Conflict Prevention , Peace Building & Mediation
“COVİD-19” PANDEMİYASI ƏRZİNDƏ VƏ SONRAKI DÖVR ÜÇÜN ƏDALƏT MÜHAKİMƏSİ SİSTEML...Khayyam Bayramov, LLM
“COVİD-19” PANDEMİYASI ƏRZİNDƏ VƏ SONRAKI DÖVR ÜÇÜN ƏDALƏT MÜHAKİMƏSİ SİSTEMLƏRİ QARŞISINDA DURAN PROBLEMLƏR VƏ
ƏLDƏ OLUNAN NƏTİCƏLƏR BARƏDƏ CEPEJ XARTİYASI
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
IMPACT AND LESSONS OF THE COVID19 CRISIS AS REGARDS THE EFFICIENCY OF JUSTICE AND THE FUNCTIONING OF THE JUDICIARY
1. Strasbourg, 10 June 2020
CEPEJ/ODJ(2020)1Prov16
EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR THE EFFICIENCY OF JUSTICE (CEPEJ)
Ad hoc virtual CEPEJ plenary meeting1
Wednesday 10 June 2020 (9h30-16h00)
Organised in the framework of the Greek Presidency
of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe
DRAFT
IIMMPPAACCTT AANNDD LLEESSSSOONNSS OOFF TTHHEE CCOOVVIIDD1199 CCRRIISSIISS AASS RREEGGAARRDDSS
TTHHEE EEFFFFIICCIIEENNCCYY OOFF JJUUSSTTIICCEE AANNDD TTHHEE FFUUNNCCTTIIOONNIINNGG OOFF TTHHEE JJUUDDIICCIIAARRYY
The Council of Europe, through the CEPEJ, is present throughout Europe, in courts, judges'
offices, high councils of justice, court administrations, and in connection with ministries of
justice, to contribute to creating better justice. The 2020 sanitary crisis, presents a sad but
important opportunity for the CEPEJ to commit itself as a living and responsive place of
exchange and dissemination, at the service of the judicial world, to help ensure that the public
service of justice is not interrupted.
Given the context, this plenary meeting will be quite different from the CEPEJ’s previous
meetings. The aim is to bring together CEPEJ members and observers to reflect and draw
lessons from the crisis with a view to achieving a more efficient justice in Council of Europe
member States, with full respect for human rights and fair trial requirements. The meeting will
look into a range of specific issues related to the delivery of justice and the functioning of
courts during and after the pandemic. The meeting will also examine the contribution and
particular added value of the CEPEJ in the post-pandemic period.
This CEPEJ ad hoc plenary meeting is organised in the framework of the Greek Presidency aimed at
"Effectively responding to a sanitary crisis in full respect for human rights and the principles of
democracy and the rule of law".
1
The on-going work of the CEPEJ is ensured via other virtual meetings of the CEPEJ Working Groups and the finalised
documents will be submitted to the CEPEJ for adoption by written procedure in a parallel procedure.
2. How does it work?
This meeting will be organised by videoconference (KUDO system) and English/French
interpretation will be provided. You will receive the link for the Virtual Meeting after you confirm
your participation.
The group dynamic is key to collaborative brainstorming as well as creative thinking. It is
important to be succinct and focused when intervening and reacting.
You can intervene:
- for the general presentation of the question (limited to 2’). Please contact the Secretariat in
advance, before the 2nd
of June to register as a speaker, or
- for the contributions. Prepare if possible 1 or 2 sentences concerning the issue on which you
would like to intervene. You should contact the moderator during the meeting in order to
intervene,
Everyone is free to ask for the floor in the course of the discussion under each topic.
General Introduction and state of play concerning the work of the CEPEJ
9h30 - 10h00
Moderator: Christos GIAKOUMOPOULOS, Director General - Human rights and Rule of Law
Opening
Marija PEJČINOVIĆ BURIĆ, Secretary General of the Council of Europe (5’)
Jānis BORDĀNS, Minister of Justice of Latvia (2’)
Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan), President of the CEPEJ, Judge, Baku Court of Appeal (5’)
On-going work of the CEPEJ during the Covid19 Crisis
Muriel DECOT, Secretary of the CEPEJ
Session I - Impact of the Covid19 crisis: is it possible to ensure normally the
public service of justice?
10h00 - 12h00
Moderator: Georg STAWA (Austria), Counsellor for the Western Balkans, Federal Ministry of Justice
Introduction: Judicial systems in the face of a pandemic, Jean-Paul JEAN (France) (10’), Honorary
President of Chamber at the Court of Cassation
Fair balance between maximum efficiency in the handling of priority cases and the respect of the
principles of fair trial
General presentation: Jean-Paul JANSSENS (Belgium), President of the Board of Directors of the
Federal Public Service Justice
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each):
• Mohamed RASLAN (Egypt), Vice-President of the Council of State
• Mohamed OUKHLIFA (Morocco), Advocate General at the Court of Cassation, seconded to the
Presidency of the Public Prosecutor's Office
Discussion (10 to 16’)
3. New E-justice tools used during the crisis: opportunities, challenges and dangers
General presentation: Joao ARSENIO DE OLIVEIRA (Portugal), President of the CEPEJ-GT-QUAL, Head of
the International Affairs Department, Ministry of Justice (2’)
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each):
• Konstantinos KOUSSOULIS (Greece), Councillor at the Hellenic Council of State, Director of the
legal office of the President of the Republic
Discussion (10 to 16’)
Is the justice user sufficiently informed?
General presentation: Jaša VRABEC (Slovenia), President of the CEPEJ-GT-EVAL, Head of the Office for
Court Management Development, Supreme Court (2’)
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each)
Discussion (10 to 16’)
The safety of justice professionals (judges, court clerks, other court staff, lawyers, etc.)
General presentation: Laetitia BRUNIN (France), member of the Bureau of the CEPEJ, Prosecutor
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each):
• Margarete VON GALEN, Vice-President of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe
(CCBE)
Discussion (10 to 16’)
Is teleworking suitable for all justice professionals?
General presentation: Francesco DEPASQUALE (Malta), member of the Bureau of the CEPEJ, Judge,
Superior Courts (2’)
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each)
Discussion (10 to 16’)
Consequences for lawyers/notaries/bailiffs/mediators of the lockdown of courts
General presentation: Patrick GIELEN, Advisor, International Union of Judicial Officers (UIHJ) (2’)
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each):
• Margarete VON GALEN, Vice-President of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe
(CCBE)
• Jean-Jacques KUSTER, European Union of Rechtspfleger/Court clerks (EUR)
• Ivana NINČIĆ OSTERLE (Serbia), Ministry of Justice
Discussion (10 to 16’)
12h00 – 13h30 Pause
Session II – After the Covid19 crisis: which lessons for the justice systems in 2021
and beyond?
13h30 - 15h00
Moderator: Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan), President of the CEPEJ, Judge, Baku Court of Appeal
Towards new ways of managing timeframes of proceedings and backlogs
General presentation: Giacomo OBERTO (Italy), President of CEPEJ-SATURN, Judge, First instance Court
of Torino (2’)
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each)
Discussion (10 to 16’)
New “crisis” competences for judicial authorities responsible for the administration of justice and for
lawyers?
General presentation: Ivan CRNČEC (Croatia), Assistant Minister, International Co-operation Directorate,
Ministry of justice (2’)
4. Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each)
Discussion (10 to 16’)
Development of court hearings by videoconference
General presentation: Gregor STROJIN (Slovenia), member of the CEPEJ-CYBERJUST, Advisor to the
President of the Supreme Court (2’)
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each)
Discussion (10 to 16’)
New modes of collaborative work
General presentation: Merethe ECKHARDT (Denmark), Director of development, The Danish Court
Administration (2’)
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each)
Discussion (10 to 16’)
Challenge of dematerialisation of cases and/or AI
General presentation: Maria Giuliana CIVININI (Italy), Member of the CEPEJ-GT-CYBERJUST, President of
the Court of Pisa (2’)
Contributions (4 maxi, 2’ each)
Discussion (10 to 16’)
Conclusions with a view to the adoption of a CEPEJ Declaration
15h00 – 16h00
General conclusion
Miltiadis VARVITSIOTIS, Alternate Minister of Foreign Affairs of Greece
Hanne JUNCHER, Head of the Justice and Legal Co-operation Department
Presentation of the draft CEPEJ Declaration regarding: (1) Lessons learnt from Covid 19 (2) Challenges
ahead to address, in particular, for the CEPEJ Declaration
Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan), President of the CEPEJ, Judge, Baku Court of Appeal
Discussion
Adoption of the Declaration