The draft Inclusive Mobility Action Plan was presented as the result of consultative workshops with stakeholders. It aims to make Metro Manila's transport system more inclusive and serve all residents, especially the poor and vulnerable. The plan envisions safe, accessible transport through public-private-community partnerships across mobility, safety, productivity and civility. Key initiatives identified for the next year include finalizing the action plan, improving the network's online presence, developing educational materials, and expanding membership.

1. INCLUSIVE MOBILITY N ETWORK
ORGANIZATIONAL MEETI NG
FEBRUARY 4, 2014
with generous support from

2. INCLUSIVE MOBILITY NETWORK ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING
Faber Hall Function Room
Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, Quezon City
February 4, 2014
DOCUMENTATION REPORT

3. TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 6
OPENING PROGRAM.............................................................................................................................................. 8
WORDS OF WELCOME ............................................................................................................................................................ 8
PRESENTATION OF THE DRAFT INCLUSIVE MOBILITY ACTION PLAN ............................................................................ 9
Open Forum .............................................................................................................................................................................. 13
PRESENTATION OF STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS ..................................................................... 16
ORGANIZATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON CSO NETWORKS ................................................................................................. 24
Model Network: Partnership for Clean Air ................................................................................................................ 24
IM Network Organizational Design: ............................................................................................................................. 25
The Whole Must Be More than the Sum of its Parts .............................................................................................. 25
NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF THE INTERIM EXECUTIVE COUNCIL ......................................................................... 26
CLOSING REMARKS................................................................................................................................................................ 28

4. LIST OF ACRONYMS
ADB
Asian Development Bank
AKKAPP
Abot Kamay ng mga may Kapansanang Pasigueño ang Pag-unlad
ANSA-EAP
Affiliated Network of Social Accountability in the East Asia and Pacific
ASoG
Ateneo School of Government
BPI
Bank of the Philippine Island
CCTV
Closed-Circuit Television
CENRO
City Environment and Natural Resource Office
CLUP
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
COCAP
Concerned with Advocating Philippine Environmental Sustainability
CSO
Civil Society Organization
DENR
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DEO
District Engineering Office
DoT
Department of Tourism
DPWH
Department of Public Works and Highways
E-buses
Electric Buses
E-jeepney
Electric Jeepney
EMBOA
Ermita-Malate Bus Owners Association
EVAP
Electric Vehicle Alliance of the Philippines
FSSI
Foundation for Sustainable Societies Inc.
HR
House of Representatives
iBoP Asia
Innovations at the Base of the Pyramid in Southeast Asia
IEC
Information Education Communication
IM
Inclusive Mobility
ISO
Institute of Social Order
LCP
League of Cities of the Philippines
LGU
Local Government Unit
LRT
Light Rail Transit
MC
Motorcycle
MMASBA
Metro Manila Anti-Smoke Belching Association
MMDA
Metropolitan Manila Development Authority

5. MRT
Metro Rail Transit
NCR
National Capital Region
NGA
National Government Agency
NGO
Non-government Organization
NPDC
National Parks Development Committee
PCA
Partnership for Clean Air
PDAO
Person with Disability Office
PIO
Public Information Office
PTA
Parent Teacher Association
PWD
Person with disability
TOCA
Transport Organization for Clean Air
TODA
Tricycle and Drivers Association
TSP
Tiklop Society of the Philippines
TSSP
Transportation Science Society of the Philippines
UP
University of the Philippines
UP-NCTS
University of the Philippines-National Center for Transport Studies
US AEP
United States Asia Environmental Partnership
VMG
Vision, Mission, Goal
ZWRMP
Zero Waste Recycling Movement of the Philippines

6. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Inclusive Mobility Network Organizational Meeting held at Faber Hall Function Room, Ateneo de
Manila University Loyola Heights Quezon City last 4 February 2014, was attended by a total of 54
individuals coming from different sectors. Each represents a total of 24 various organizations. About
13% of the participants came from the community, 30% from the government (national and local), 9%
were members of persons with disability, while the remaining 48% were from the academe, private
sector, NGOs and CSOs. With support from the Rockefeller Foundation, this event was organized by the
Innovations at the Base of the Pyramid in Southeast Asia (iBoP Asia) Program under the Inclusive
Mobility Project of the Ateneo School of Government (ASoG).
The program formally started by the welcome remarks from Dr. Segundo Romero, Project Director of
Inclusive Mobility Project. He marked this day as the end of the Inclusive Mobility (IM) Project but the
birth of the Inclusive Mobility Network, a community with different individual advocacies but has a
unified voice in terms of inclusive mobility emphasizing the accessibility of the poor and vulnerable to
livelihood, work, public services and other activities. This network was born through a series of meetings
and workshops aiming to give the vulnerable groups equal access. He highlighted that the network is not
an adversarial network rather a group seeking solution to problems on inclusive mobility in which all
sector is duly represented. This meeting aims to organize an executive council to work on formalizing
the network by registering it under the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The draft IM Action Plan was presented as a result of the series of meetings and workshops using a
participatory and consultative process. The action plan would serve as a guide in determining the right
projects and aid for policy making in advancing a more sustainable transport and livable cities. Some of
the pressing points raised were: the need to come up with an immediate communication plan to
disseminate the plan to a wider audience; strengthen the tripartite partnership of the government;
private sector and community groups for the plans to transpire; involve more experts in the planning
process that would yield to a more strategic program as one Metro Manila; and, changing mindsets
involved in the action plan should include a paradigm shift of kids and the youth by spreading
information through the education sector. The IM Action Plan was perceived a dream come true for the
vulnerable sector especially the PWDs as they are given voice and their opinions mattered. The IM
Network is also key in allowing the government to access relevant data in transport, helping each other
toward a common goal and in giving the overall picture of sustainable transport.
The proposed structure and form of the IM Network was also presented and provisionally approved by
the members. It was followed by the election of the interim Executive Council. There were four
nominees from the marginalized sector, seven candidates from the community road users sector, eight
prospects from the media, NGO and academe group, four choices from the private sector and seven
nominees from the government. The election rules was established using a constructive participatory
process which resulted into selecting Ms. Tina Velasco (government), Mr. Cyrus Velega (marginalized),
Mr. Rally de Leon (private), Mr. Quin Cruz (community road users), Ms. Vicky Segovia (NGO), Ms. Karen
Crisostomo (NGO), Ms. Lalaine Guanzon (marginalized), Mr. Ryan Sumo (private), Ms. Dinna Dayao
(media), and Mr. Bert Suansing (private) to serve a 2-year term of office. While Ms. Elsie de Veyra
(marginalized), Mr. Pio Fortuno (community road users), Mr. Yeb Saño (government), Ms. Louie Golla

7. (community road users), Mr. Liberato Requima (government) will serve a 1-year term of office. It was
agreed that five other additional representatives from the list of nominees would be named by the
Executive Council.
In his closing remarks, Dr. Romero urged everyone to be tolerant with one another and render respect
and diplomacy in dealing with the other sectors as part of the network. He underlined that this is no
longer an IM project team output but the project of all members as the ideas come from everyone. The
IM project team would serve as the secretariat, which will assist the rising of the IM network logistically.
He encouraged all to locate their specific advocacies in the big IM picture for the network to work as a
whole.

8. OPENING PROGRAM
The Inclusive Mobility Network Organizational Meeting was attended by a total of 54 individuals with
the following representation:
Participant Representation
NGA
4%
PWD
9%
Academe
4%
Community
13%
CSO
17%
LGU
26%
Transport Sector
5%
NGO
22%
The program started with everyone singing the National Anthem of the Philippines followed by an
invocation led by the emcee, Mr. Lorenzo Cordova.
WORDS OF WELCOME
Dr. Segundo Romero, Executive Director, iBoP Asia
Dr. Romero was happy to declare that this day
was the end of the inclusive mobility project and
the birth of a new system of inclusive mobility
known as a network. This network was not born
overnight, it is a product of a series of meetings
and workshops conducted by the inclusive
mobility project. He gave a quick run through of
the process that the Inclusive Mobility Network
went through.
During the first meeting entitled Metro Manila
Transport Challenge Workshop held last 12
September 2013 at the ISO Conference Room at the Ateneo De Manila University, the Inclusive Mobility

9. project team conducted a diagnostic workshop with major stakeholders to determine the problems in
sustainable transport. The second meeting entitled Inclusive Mobility Initiatives Mapping Workshop held
last 17 October 2013 at the Faber Hall Conference Room at the Ateneo De Manila University discussed
the solutions to the issues raised in the first meeting. It was in these two meetings that inclusive
mobility was introduced.
This meeting was meant to organize an interim executive council to be formalized and registered
through the Securities and Exchange Commission. The idea of having an inclusive mobility community or
group is for the government to have someone to approach or talk to about anything related to inclusive
mobility. The idea was unthinkable since each member has their own advocacies but the Inclusive
Mobility Network brought them together under a unified voice. Dr. Romero reiterated that the Inclusive
Mobility Network is not meant to be adversarial rather a solution seeking group that shed more light
than heat on having a more sustainable and inclusive transport system. And though most of the
members are from the NGO and CSO sector, the concept of inclusivity implies that everyone (all sectors)
should be represented in the network. In line with this, Dr. Romero welcomed everyone present in the
meeting today and hoped that they all remain until the end of the program especially during the
election of the Executive Council.
PRESENTATION OF THE DRAFT INCLUSIVE MOBILITY ACTION PLAN
Mr. Lorenzo Cordova Jr., Research Associate, Inclusive Mobility Project
Mr. Cordova highlighted the importance of
having a critical partnership in communicating
with one another. The Inclusive Mobility
project team compiled the result of the series
of meetings and workshops into an Inclusive
Mobility Action Plan. Two short videos were
shown for the benefit of those who were not
present during the first two meetings. The
videos showed the highlights and what
transpired during the workshops. The entire
solution-seeking process involved a series of
workshops to determine the issues,
challenges, initiatives that may not even
require new policies and opportunities facing the transport sector. The process aimed towards
determining the elements for visioning the future of transportation and mobility in Metro Manila. Lastly,
the process identified champions or advocates for a better transport system. The end product is an
action plan.
The overriding goal of the IM Action Plan is to look beyond the problem of traffic. It has the following
four main objectives:
1. To broaden and make more inclusive the process of diagnosing and designing solutions for
Metro Manila's mobility problems;

10. 2. To increase the overall quality of the mobility system in Metro Manila by ensuring that
adequately serves even the poor, the vulnerable, the disadvantaged, the marginalized, and the
voiceless Metro Manilans;
3. To encourage multi-sector partnership in attaining collective impact in solving Metro Manila
problem; and
4. To create an inclusive Metro Manila mobility system that will serve as a key foundation for
enhancing livability and sustainability of Metro Manila as one of the world's premiere
metropolitan center.
The strategic framework of the action plan involves having all stakeholders in one place to talk: the
government, private sector and the community. It signifies a multi-dimensional solution as it involves
the four aspects: mobility, safety, productivity, and civility.
The IM community envisions inclusive mobility in Metro Manila as a safe, seamless, well connected,
accessible, and user-friendly Metro Manila sustainable urban transport system that works for all Metro
Manilans, especially the poor, the vulnerable, the disadvantaged, and the marginalized.
Inclusive mobility outcomes are grounded on a multi-sectoral network of Metro Manilans actively
partnering with the government, private sector and civil society. It is categorized according to the
aspects of mobility where enhanced mobility is defined as achieving travel purposes at the least cost and
travel time; enhanced safety is travelling with least risk of loss of life, limb and property; enhanced
productivity is generating higher peoduction of goods and services as a result of less travel cost, effort

11. and time; and lastly enhanced civility is having enhanced courtesy, discipline, and contribution to an
engaging and encouraging travel and mobility environment. The indicators of each aspect and their
desired outcomes were presented by Mr. Cordova.
The entire action planning process involved three significant steps: 1) identification and diagnosis of
problems, issues, and concerns; 2) Design of strategies, programs, and initiatives; and 3) prioritization of
actions to be taken.
The identification and diagnosis stage was classified into various perspectives: outcome, multidimensional, and modal. Outcome perspective tackled the four aspects of mobility which centers on
issues/ challenges among motorists and non-mototized transport road users; challenges to commuters,
pedestrians and PWDs; and issues among lawmakers and enforcers. Multi-dimensional perspective
looked at the different dimensions of physical, economic, social, environmental, institutional and
technological while modal perspective described the challenges per transportation mode: train (PNR,
MRT, LRT), bus, jeepney, AUV, private vehicles, tricycles, and bicycles.
The strategies, programs and initiatives of the IM network used a ten-point strategy as follows:
1. Making the transport system work for the poor and vulnerable which aims to lower transport
fares and find ways to improve day-to-day experience of public transport users.
2. Designing the city to be walkable, bike-able and accessible which aims to create a healthier
community with more walkable and pedestrian friendly spaces.
3. Moving people, not vehicles desires urban transport to move the majority of the city's
population. This entails building more efficient transport system that connects people with their
jobs, health care, education, and other basic needs.
4. Ensuring mobility with safety & civility which pertains to strict implementation of laws while
safeguarding and promoting the welfare of the general public who uses the public transport
system. On the other hand, the general pubic has an important role in performing its duties as a
good citizen.
5. Promoting clean air, clean streets, clean vehicles, & clean facilities to enhance public health and
reducing environmental degradation caused by pollution from the transport sector. This also
includes the promotion for the use of new technologies as alternative to fossil fuel based
transport modes.
6. Planning and communicating better and travelling less which aims to advance an effective
planning process that competently allocates resources, and helps decision makers and transport
users prioritize transport activities that reduce the need for personal travel and provide
alternative transportation options. It also aims to advance an effective planning process that
competently allocates resources, and helps decision makers and transport users prioritize
transport activities that reduce the need for personal travel and provide alternative
transportation options.
7. Sharing information to increase connectivity and accessibility by leveraging on the use of
technology. Public sharing of information enables alternative and out-of-the-box options and
solutions.
8. Making our neighborhoods more accessible to the rest of the city with the aim on how to
inrease or create higher levels of neighborhood connectivity.

12. 9. Changing mindsets and behaviors - the authorities' as well as ours pushing for a paradigm shift
to a more comprehensive transportation system. It deviates from "traffic as the problem" to
finding mobility solutions.
10. Attaining the mobility of all by engaging all especially the poor since they are the most affected
whenever there are changes/projects in the transport sector. Thus, the IM Network offers an
online platform to give them voice and to facilitate suggestions and recommendations.
Priority actions to be taken were identified as key initiatives that can be implemented by the IM
Network in the short-term or a period of one year. The following were identified as the key initiatives
and their current state:
KEY INITIATIVES
IM Network Action Plan
IM Portal
Infographics
IM Audit Studies
Community Level IM Pilot
Projects
IM Professional Course
IM Network Expansion
On-line petitions
Media Engagement
Regular Tripartite Policy
Meetings
STATUS
Done and presented in this meeting
Existing but needs a little tweaking and improvement
IM Network needs to tap art schools to help them develop knowledge
products for educating the public about transport and mobility system in
Metro Manila
Needs to harness transport governance research to get indicators and
determine what the proper engagement for the network
Needs to be utilized for all elements to be used
Have yet to be established
Identify who else should be included and whether the network can be
expanded to other major cities not just Metro Manila
Need to be planned well. An example would be the current petition that
calls for public officials to commute at least once a month.
Being done by some members but network members need to be more
visual in the media for public exposure
Need to be planned
The roles of the government, private and civil society sectors were also presented by Mr. Cordova. He
said that the government should constantly collaborate with the private, non-profit and philanthropic
sectors. They should influence the private sector investments to work towards sustainable urban
transport and encourage investments in sustainable transport infrastructures. The private sector comes
in as funding support for the government. They should find adequate resources to help cities finance
infrastructure and deliver adequate services. This is where the public private partnership mechanisms
also come in. Civil society has a lot of roles because it varies in nature. Civil society should lead in
activities that change mindsets and behaviors of transport users, private sector and decision-makers.
They also generate specific actions and participate in independent monitoring and evaluation programs
and projects and in data gathering for sound decision-making. They can also accumulate and share
knowledge, capacity, skills and networks.
The plan wanted the strategies, programs and initiatives to be programmatic and sequential, hence the
inclusion of an IM action program that improves physical connectivity, improve communication and
encourage transport user contribution to overall mobility. All of the outcomes and programs presented

13. earlier were organized into the action programs such as: Inclusive Safety Action Program, Inclusive
Productivity Action Program, and Inclusive Civility Action Program each with suggested key actions of
the government, private, and civil society sectors.
This Action Plan presented is open to suggestions, comments, and critical opinions from all sectors for
improvement. Everyone was given a printed copy for review.
OPEN FORUM
The floor was opened for comments, suggestions and reactions from the participants.
Most of the participants commended the IM project team for the very comprehensive action plan and in
helping create an IM community that represents inclusivity in all aspects. The expansion of the IM
network involves making it a stronger organization that puts everybody together to work and think as
one.
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS SPECIFIC TO
THE ACTION PLAN:





The immediate strategies perhaps
need to detail a communication plan
to make the network and action plan
known to a wider audience.
The role and task of the government
sector should undertake a careful and
thoughtful planning. This has been
missing for the longest time.
The private sector's role should not
only help in mobilizing resources but
also include not taking advantage of the situation by raising fees or fares. They should apply the
real essence of public-private partnership. PPP happens in both ways.
"Drenched in sweat moving from point A to point B" found in the action plan pertaining to
cycling is not necessary.
"Bicycles can only safely transport one person..." also found in the action plan should take into
consideration pedicabs which can transport more than one person.
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE IM NETWORK:

Make the network stronger because of the avalanche of activities as a result of building the IM
community. The challenge is to be able to put things together. Invite more experts into putting
everything into a strategic plan that makes the rest in the government and private sector see IM
in a simplistic way that calls for the urgency to take actions already. Metropolitan Manila
Development Authority (MMDA), Pasig and Makati are all putting things together but there is no
agenda that works for one whole Metro Manila. There is a need to be smarter in making plans
and to communicate well.

14.  PWDs are happy for the representation that they
now enjoy. Their representation in many IM activities
opened doors and brought awareness to many National
Government Agencies (NGAs) that PWDs are part of the
society and needs attention. Their rights are given voice
through the IM Network.
 Since there is no existing CSO that acts to address
the needs pertaining to the transport sector, the majority of
the CSO representation in the IM Network is a great
opportunity. There are many proposals by the government
on creating more infrastructures but the IM Network is
CSO's opportunity to show the government facts and data
to compel a paradigm shift for everyone including other
CSOs. All sectors have various individual advocacies but do
not speak as one so the IM Network clearly helps in giving
inclusive mobility a voice.
 Tap the Department of Education by sending them
flyers and representatives from our network to talk to students and parents during PTAs in order
to make them aware of what the network is doing. The last Monday of March is declared as
disability day, this can be the good time to talk to students about IM and promote inclusivity in
transport.
OTHER POINTS RAISED:
 Study all roads (east to west, north to south) and consider
constructing separate roads for the exclusive use of public and
private vehicles (a road where private vehicles only can ply).
 Study whether motorcycle (MC) lanes in major
thoroughfares could be exclusive to motorcycles. MMDA placed a
motorcycle lane with an understanding that this is a private lane
for motorcycles however, other vehicles overtaking in the lane
compromises the safety of MC riders. The government calls it
reserved lane but road users have different interpretation. We
understand that infrastructure is lacking but the IM network can
help in the safety of MC riders.
 Study the option of opening subdivisions to MCs for traffic
decongestion.
 Changing mindsets should also include the young by
spreading communication through the education sector.
 The safety issue of MC riders caused by the rampant
incidence of crimes committed by motorcycle riding in tandem.
 There is hope to continue and encourage MC riders to
undergo safety seminars because of increasing number of MC users. There is a need to impose
discipline and responsibility on MC riders in plying the roads of Metro Manila.

15. 

Some LGU policies are inconsistent with national policies. For example, Batas Pambansa 344
states that roads should be accessible to PWDs but some subdivisions do not follow. Another
example is wearing a helmet. It is required for MC riders but some subdivisions impose a "no
helmet allowed inside the subdivision" policy, which the LGU could do nothing about.
Share the Road Movement will file a petition on the Writ of Kalikasan on 13 February 2014 and
is encouraging everyone to share their experiences and get their story across. These stories
would make their advocacy more compelling. The writ invoked during one of their
environmental law class would oblige the government to strictly enforce all environmental laws
and specific provisions on road sharing. It also urges everybody to allocate spaces for cyclists
and runners too. It does not aim to eliminate motor vehicles but encourage other people to use
other modes of transportation to lessen the environmental impact of motorized transport.
RESPONSE BY THE IM PROJECT TEAM
Dr. Danielle Guillen said that part of
the reason for building an IM Network
is to reach out to all sectors including
the government sector. The idea of
forming an IM Network aside from
raising issues is to find solutions to
these issues. She acknowledged that
traffic is not only due to the number of
vehicles plying the road but also
because of the lack of connectivity to
private subdivisions. From each
community, individuals must realize
that everyone has a role. There do exist
technologies that could help identify
transport issues and concerns (i.e. CCTV cameras) and there are lobbyists who rally to help the
government and find solutions to the existing problems. She encouraged everyone to be champions for
the sector and avoid blaming the other.
Dr. Romero said that the open forum clearly showed that the IM network is composed of a diverse set of
people and organizations. It involves all sectors and he was happy that representatives from the
government (LGU and NGA) were always present because their presence is crucial in every meeting. He
recognized that their role is difficult because the network is composed largely of CSO/NGO and the
government is always in the minority. The government's attendance is pivotal so ideas from the group
would not fall under the extreme. The government provides the necessary balance and perspective to
the group. Tyranny of the minority is avoided by having a permanent set of government representatives
every time.
Dr. Romero cited MMDA as a government institution share a similar agenda with IM. In fact, MMDA's
plan has portions on mobility, safety, civility and productivity. They have started to separate the
perspective of mobility on their plans and programs however, since traffic and transport management is
part of their mandate, they could not zero in on mobility alone.

16. The main contribution of the IM group is to give the big picture on sustainable transport in Metro
Manila. Dr. Romero urged all to look at their activities and individuals and locate their specific
advocacies in the big picture. The outputs of the group are no longer outputs of the IM project but the
product of every member. All ideas came from every member through a participatory solution seeking
process. The IM project team serves as a midwife1 giving birth to the IM Network. The project team will
not leave soon as the project ends, they will continue to listen and to provide resources for the
network's activities. IM becomes the network of organizations and individuals and no longer the project.
PRESENTATION OF STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS
As a form of getting the profile of participants, they were given pens and papers to write the following
information:






About your organization
Purpose/ Objective of the organization
Members
Activities/ Initiatives
Future plans
Thoughts of being a member of the network if you will join
Below were the ones submitted and presented in plenary:
ABOUT THE
ORGANIZATION
Viva Manila
 Neighborhood
revitalization of
Intramuros,
Ermita, Malate
through arts and
culture to improve
livability and
creativity
 Members include
Carlos Celran, Ria
Cimjap, Charrise
Aquino-Tugade,
Daniel Darain
 Institutional
partner include:
1
ACTIVITIES/
INITIATIVES
Pasyal Sumakay: Carless street fair in
Intramuros
FUTURE PLANS
THOUGHTS ON BEING
A MEMBER OF THE
NETWORK
Assist in building and
promoting IM
campaigns/ advocacy
Can partner to host
events
Possible to
coordinate on pilot
project such as bike
racks for Rizal Park
Dictionary definition: a person that helps to bring something into being or assists in development

17. ABOUT THE
ORGANIZATION
DoT, Intramuros
Administration,
Manila City Hall,
EMBOA (business
association), NPDC
(National Parks
Development
Committee), other
CSOs
World Bank
ACTIVITIES/
INITIATIVES
FUTURE PLANS
Working on Greenprint
2030 - three pillars:
inclusive, connected,
resilient
Can talk on how to
integrate IM agenda
Still launching report
and preparatory Phase
II
City Transportation
Management and
Development Office of
Marikina
 Effectively and
efficiently manage
the transportation
and traffic system
within the city
 Traffic manning
activities
 Transportation
regulatory
enforcement
operations
 IEC campaigns
 Planning and design
(traffic engineering)
 Transport relations
activities
DPWH-NCR
 Implement
infrastructure
projects
 Members: DPWHNCR Metro Manila,
9 District
Engineering Offices
(DEOs)
Arangkada Alliance

 Uphold rights and
welfare of riders
 Empowerment and 
THOUGHTS ON BEING
A MEMBER OF THE
NETWORK
 Construction of
alternative roads
 Development of
Marikina Eastern
Transport Terminal
 Designation of roads
for private vehicles
Personal level:
interested to be a
pedestrian champion
within IM Network
and the STOP fan
campaign which
pedestrians can use
in crossing the streets
Will be proactive
members of the
network. Looks
forward to the
realization of the 10point strategy
especially in item
number 6.
Giving information/
dissemination
updates of the
DPWH-NCR project
implementation
Seminar on riders
rights and safety
riding seminar
Humanitarian


Well-disciplined
community
Progressive MC
community
A well-benefited
organized network
group

18. ABOUT THE
ORGANIZATION
education
Members: 6,000
active and
motorcycle clubs
Motorcycle Rights
Association
 19,000 member
advocates
 National leaders:
Joverty Bolanos
and Martin Misa
Bulacan Motorcycle Riders
Federation
 18 organizations
and clubs
ACTIVITIES/
INITIATIVES
FUTURE PLANS
THOUGHTS ON BEING
A MEMBER OF THE
NETWORK
activities

Institute for Climate and
Sustainable Cities
 Work on climate
solutions and fair
climate policy
 Membership:
Aksyon Kilma,
Electric Vehicle
Alliance,
Partnership for
Clean Air
Partnership for Clean Air,
Inc.
 Evolved from
"Lead-free
Coalition"
 Promote air quality
movement as a
multi-stakeholder
effort in the
Philippines
 Objective: to
facilitate air quality
activities of
members and
stakeholders
 Members: 58













Rider advocate
safety and welfare
HPG force
multiplier
Blood Brother
(conditional
donation) Dugong
Alay Dugtong ng
Buhay
Promotion of
"Tatlong
Republika"
Ride for a cause
E-jeepney
revolution
Climate friendly
cities
People's Survival
Fund adaptation
Slow-onset
impacts, systems
of rice
intensification
Upgrade tricycles
from 2-stroke to 4stroke
Cleaner fuels
Road sharing
Walkable, Livable,
and Clean Cities
Willingly joins the IM
Network




Improve e-jeepney
system
Enterprise of
electric public
utility vehicles
Walking and cycling
are the most
environmentallyfriendly forms of
transport
Eco-driving
Clean fleet (Electric
vehicles)
IM is in line with their
VMG

19. ABOUT THE
ORGANIZATION
organizations (e.g.
COCAP, BPI Globe
Bangko, Miriam
College, MMASBA,
ZWRMP, UP-NCTS,
Atin To
Development,
TOCA, Clean Air
Asia, DENR)
Tiklop Society of the
Philippines
 Promote folding
bikes as part of
one's lifestyle
 Promote bimodal
transport
 Espouse 'share the
road" concept
 Give back to
society any way we
can
 Members: over
6,000 in facebook,
around 300
extremely active,
cuts across all
sectors of society
ACTIVITIES/
INITIATIVES







Firefly Brigade

 Promote the
bicycle for clean air 
as an environment
friendly means of
transportation and
sustainable

communities
Instrumental in
opening LRT and
MRT to allow
folding bikes
Trains newbies
how to bike safely
on city roads
At least 6 rides a
week
Promotes share
the road
Open members'
minds to society
concerns
Advocacy projects:
orphanage visits/
elderly homes,
lighten up project
(give safety gear to
cyclist commuters),
bike sharing
program for UP
Tacloban students
Push the Bike
Parking Bill (HR Bill
5240)
Monthly critical
mass rides
Monthly urban
safety and
etiquette skills
riding clinic
Bike to work
program (bike
buddy/ bike guide)
FUTURE PLANS





THOUGHTS ON BEING
A MEMBER OF THE
NETWORK
Continue to push
the envelope
Continue to change
people's minds and
expand comfort
levels and
awareness
TSP will be a great
integral cog in IM
Have more people
riding their bikes
than their cars
More bikes than
cars on the road
All private/ public
sectors, companies
to have bike
friendly facilities
Very beneficial to
promoting the
advocacy and it will
be helpful for us in
supporting our
programs and
projects

20. ABOUT THE
ORGANIZATION
ACTIVITIES/
INITIATIVES


National Bike Day
Coordination with
LGUs for more bike
friendly
communities
Conduct sensitivity
training
Provide livelihood/
medical treatment
FUTURE PLANS

Educate the youth

Mainstreaming
PWDS
Have more
"wheemobiles",
accessible
transportation in
all LGUs, major
roads everywhere
(schools, work,
hospitals,
recreation centers)
Make the
Philippines PWD
friendly, accessible
and barrier-free
society
Share expertise, best
practice on PWD
sector, be an
instrument, inspire
and represent PWD
sector
Grateful to the IM
Network that they
are part of this
advocacy. IM
Network is more
truthful. IM network
can help the PWD
sector a lot. IM action
plan should be
actualized.
The LCP is more than
willing to be part of
this network.
Genuine urban
development
requires building
linkages.
Circle of Friends
Foundation Inc.
 Founded in 1998
 To provide
equality, dignity
and mobility for
PWD
 Provide accessible
transportation
"wheelmobile"
accessible van with
ramp
 Members: PWD,
artist with
disability,
volunteers, filipino
artists
AKKAP Pasig Federation
 Make the rights of
PWD real
 PWD society of
Pasig City
 Members: 1,000+
from different
barangays


Submits monthly
activity proposal to
Pasig LGU on PWD
livelihood, health
and recreation

To have PDAO
(Person with
Disability Office) at
the LGU which
should have annual
funds to create and
sustain their
programs.
League of Cities of the
Philippines (LCP)
 To serve as the
voice of cities;
advocate for
policies and
programs that
promote the
interest of cities
across the country
 Knowledge broker
for cities




General assemblies 
Conventions

Board Meetings
Programs/ projects
on various urban
development
themes
Knowledge
platform for cities
Professionalize city
managers

THOUGHTS ON BEING
A MEMBER OF THE
NETWORK



21. ABOUT THE
ORGANIZATION
ACTIVITIES/
INITIATIVES
FUTURE PLANS
THOUGHTS ON BEING
A MEMBER OF THE
NETWORK

Members: all the
cities in the
Philippines (144
cities)
Barangay/ Community
representative (from Pasig
City)
 Representation of
community leaders
including
commuters
 Members:
community leaders
including women,
senior, PWD and
students
Philippine Nurses'
Association
 An association
composed of male
and female
memebrs. It is a
non-government
and non-stock
(non-profit)
organization
 Concern on safety
and health care









Insurance driving
lessons
Participation in
car-less day,
Bike4Life, TODA,
barangay
assembly/ CENRO
activities, seminar
consultation
Outreach program
Ecology/
environment
Livelihood
Disaster
preparedness
which includes
transportation
lecture on safety.
This includes
different aspects of
transportation and
implementation of
traffic rules and
regulation.
Encourage
everybody to take
public
transportation
instead of private
cars
Enhance traffic
rules and
regulation
Train new
graduates in
nursing for
outreach program

Summer tutorial
bike
 Safety road month
Clean air month
 World Earth day
 PWD accessibility
 Barangay feedback
mechanisms for
abusive tricycle
drivers
Transport system is
the nervous system
of the city
Congratulated the IM
team. Will continue
to attend IM
activities/ program
because this is
important for all of
us. Encourage others
to spread the IM
Network and properly
implement its
objectives and
purpose. Message to
everyone is to get
along with one
another and respect
others so that you
may be respected.

22. ABOUT THE
ORGANIZATION
ACTIVITIES/
INITIATIVES

Makati City Government
 Promote general
welfare of
constituents
 Members: City
officials,
employees,
Sangguniang
Panlungsod






Lyon Couriers Inc.
 Mail delivery
business
 Represents
messengers
 Give jobs
 Identify places and
resources in all
areas
 Bike to work
 Push to address
standards and
make this
information
available to all
OpenStreetMap
Philippines

FUTURE PLANS
and other
activities/ project
Join other
organization like
IM
Green Mobility:

Makati Transport
and Traffic Summit
2013
Pedestrianization:
bicycle network
Enhanced Mobility:
rationalized urban
transport, Ayala
BRT
Promoting green
transport: e-jeeps,
e-buses
Signalization: CCTV
monitoring, red
light camera
Strategic planning/
coordination with
national
government
agencies and
residents
Most visible lately

in the Yolanda
crisis




THOUGHTS ON BEING
A MEMBER OF THE
NETWORK
Formulation of
Transport Plan
(2014-2023)
integral part of
Makati CLUP:
compact, walkable,
livable, safe, clean
resilient city
Open to partnership
with IM
Make all public
transportation
routes available in
both map and data
Mapping all
informal settlers
Help in planning
Push for walkable
sidewalk
Advocate for less
air and noise
pollution
Help in organizing
ideas and solutions.
Push for efficient use
of resources through
education.
Give specifications on
proposed solutions
(e.g. how big bike
lanes/ roads should
be?

23. ABOUT THE
ORGANIZATION
ACTIVITIES/
INITIATIVES
FUTURE PLANS
THOUGHTS ON BEING
A MEMBER OF THE
NETWORK

Crowd-sourced
mapping
 Free and open
data
 Millions of users
worldwide
Personal Level/ Citizen
 Education/ civility driver/ pedestrian/
commuter
Department of Sociology
UP Diliman
 Teach, research
 Students
 Advocacy:
mobilization of
resources
Families of Road Victims
and Survivors
 Association of
families, relatives,
friends and
colleagues of road
victims, including
survivors. It is a
support group and
at the same time
an advocacy group
for road safety
especially the
enforcement of
rules and
regulations for
road users.


Research
Changing of
culture/ mindset of
the members of
the academic
community


Book on road
safety: advocating
for road safety and
road traffic injury
victims

Social science is in the
context of social
change. Hopes to
invite more members
of the academe like
students.
Campaign to make
road safety a
societal concern as
well as a RIGHT of
every citizen.
Even before mobility,
we talk about road
safety.

24. ORGANIZATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON CSO NETWORKS
MODEL NETWORK: PARTNERSHIP FOR CLEAN AIR
Vicky M. Segovia, Executive Director
As a model network organization of a CSO network, Ms. Segovia presented the structure of Partnership
for Clean Air (PCA). PCA's structure is similar to the IM network in terms of its composition of mostly
CSO members and it being an advocacy network.
She presented the history of the
organization saying how PCA evolved from
the Lead-Free Coalition to the Coalition for
Cleaner Fuels to being PCA in June 8, 2001.
PCA was registered to be a legal entity with
the Securities and Exchange Commission
and incorporated as a non-stock, nonprofit corporation on November 23, 2003.
The PCA secretariat operations was initially
funded by a US-AEP grant in the first 6
months. The Asian Development Bank
(ADB) funded the consultants that made
up the secretariat and all operations,
overheads and projects for 2.5 years. Pilipinas Shell and Manila Observatory supported the core
operations of the PCA secretariat in subsequent years up to 2009. PCA is a national network of Clean Air
Asia in the Philippines.
In line with its mission and objectives of promoting air quality management, PCA as an organization
serves the following functions:






Coordinative as it coordinates air quality activities of members and stakeholders.
Supportive as it supports members and stakeholders in air quality activities.
Innovative as it undertakes activities in new areas of air quality management.
Participative as it continues to promote air quality management as a multi-stakeholder effort.
Responsive as it runs an efficient organization in order to be more responsive to the needs of its
members and stakeholders.
Transparent as it conducts activities and operations in a transparent manner.
PCA members comprise representation from the government, development agencies and various CSOs,
NGOs and the academe.
Ms. Segovia also presented they past key achievements in program development, capacity-building,
and social mobilization. She also showed key activities that includes annual forum on clean air,
assemblies, steering committee meetings, recruitment of clean air champions, car-free days, tricycle
upgrading project, eco/ clean fleet management, eco-driving seminars for government offices,
environmentally sustainable transport system, feasibility study of tricycle upgrading using e-trikes,
lobbied for Green Philippine Development Plan, Electric Vehicle Alliance of the Philippines (EVAP),

25. electric vehicle summit, and produce national air quality status report. They were also proud to say that
in 2013, they had been officially accepted as member of the Foundation for Sustainable Societies, Inc.
(FSSI). One of PCA's priority projects from 2013 until 2015 is the promotion of non-motorized transport
such as biking and walking. In the future, PCA hopes to continue their clean air advocacies, search for
alternative clean technologies, and be the center for training on clean cities program.
IM NETWORK ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN:
THE WHOLE MUST BE MORE THAN THE SUM OF ITS PARTS
Dr. Segundo Romero
Dr. Romero presented a proposed structure of the IM network with the goal of being the primary
advocate of mobility of all, by all, for all in Metro Manila.
In terms of membership, the project team proposed for the IM Network to have member organization
with individual members admitted according to rules that the Executive Council may provide. The IM
Network should be deliberately and unashamedly biased in favor of the poor, the vulnerable, the
disadvantages, and the marginalized Metro Manilans. Representation in the structure of the
organization should reflect this bias. The multi-sector representation in the Inclusive Mobility Network
is solely a mechanism for providing adequate information, ideas, insights, and perspectives from other
sectors, for making the strategies, policies, actions, and decisions of the Inclusive Mobility Network
consistent with the general welfare of all Metro Manilans. Representatives of the disadvantaged,
community road-users, NGOs, the private sector, and the government in the Inclusive Mobility Network
shall, as far a possible, represent their respective sectors (disadvantaged, community, NGOs, private
sector, government) and not solely as representatives of their respective organizations. The idea is for
them to contribute collectively towards a more inclusive mobility in Metro Manila.
The Executive Council is proposed to finalize the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of the IM
Network. They will be the incorporators of the Network when registered through the Philippine
Securities and Exchange Commission. Those who will be elected as Executive Council members in this
meeting shall serve as the first set of officers of the IM network for two years (February 2014 - February
2016). The Council is expected to elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman and the initial members shall
have staggered terms where half will serve for the full two-year terms and the other half for one year.
Membership in the Executive Council shall have the Executive Director of the IM Network as an exofficio member. The Executive Council is proposed to have the following composition:
QUANTITY
3
PERCENTAGE
20%
3
3
3
3
15
20%
20%
20%
20%
100%
REPRESENTATION
Vulnerable/ Disadvantaged groups (urban poor, PWDs, senior citizen,
accident victims, youth)
Community-based organizations, road-users/ commuters
NGOs, academe, media
Private sector
Government (national/ local)
TOTAL

26. The criteria for choosing members of the Executive Council includes:
1. Accepts the vision of IM for Metro Manila;
2. Able and willing to contribute personal effort for enhancing IM in Metro Manila; and
3. Able to provide sector perspective in the service of overall inclusive mobility in Metro Manila.
Meanwhile, the IM Project Team shall serve as the interim Secretariat until the project ends in May
2014, hence, they cannot be nominated nor elected as part of the Executive Council. But soon as the
project ends, they will all serve as members of the IM Network. The IM Project Director shall serve as
the interim Executive Director until the project terminates.
The proposed election rules and procedure were as follows:




Sector categories will be formed on the display gallery: (1) Marginalized, (2) Community roadusers, (3) NGO, academe, media (4) Private sector, (5) Government sector
No two council members shall come from the same organization/agency/community
Nominations for each category will be made for each sector (in the sequence above) using
metacards
Voting at large will be done using colored sticker dots
The adoption of the IM logo and tag line was also proposed as an interim arrangement to serve its
purpose on upcoming events and in the implementation of the Network’s Communication and Action
Plans.
NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF THE INTERIM EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
The nomination and election was done in a participatory manner where the participants get to comment
and suggest how the election should be done.

27. The participants were asked to nominate as many members as they could and every nominee agreed to
willingly serve the network as an executive council member. (See attachment for actual number of
nominations) The nominees per sector were as follows:
MARGINALIZED
Lalaine Guanzon
(Circle of Friends,
PWD)
Cyrus Ballega
(AKKAP
Federation, PWD)
Elsie De Veyra
(PCA, Senior
Citizen)
James Velasco
(Ryders with
Disabilities, PWD)
COMMUNITY
ROAD USERS
Pio Fortuno
(Tiklop Society of
the Philippines)
Robert Perillo
(Bulacan
Motorcycle Riders
Federation)
Quin Cruz
(Manggahan Pasig
City)
Erwin Paala
(Families of Road
Victims and
Survivors)
Trina Tolentino
(Operation
Katipunan)
Louie Golla
(Motorcycle
Philippines
Federation)
Julia Nebrija (Viva
Manila)
MEDIA, NGO,
ACADEME
Benjie Libarnes
(Arangkada)
PRIVATE SECTOR
GOVERNMENT
SECTOR
Tina Velasco
(MMDA)
Rally de Leon
(Lyon Couriers)
Cora Cruz (TSSP)
Karlo Robosa
Liberato Requioma
(DPWH-NCR)
Vicky Segovia
(PCA)
Alberto Suansing
Third Espero (LCP)
Karen Crisostomo
(Firefly Brigade)
Ryan Sumo (App
Developer)
Violeta Seva
(Makati City)
Reina Garcia
(Institute for
Climate and
Sustainable Cities)
Chad Osoria
(ANSA-EAP)
Engr. Gabriel
Eusebio (Marikina
Bikeways)
Ronald Rodriguez
(Pathways to
Higher Education)
Dinna Dayao
Paul Sison
(Marikina PIO)
Yeb Saño (Climate
Change
Commission)
The group decided to have a total of 20 members as interim executive council where they voted for 15
members during the meeting. After which the council will decide on the additional five with the end and
view of balancing the representation of all sectors in the council. This will serve as a permanent election
rule for the succeeding elections. A tie between Liberato Requioma and Violeta Seva from the
government sector called for a revote. The voting resulted into Liberato Requioma getting elected. 2
Then the 15 who got the highest votes got elected as the 15 interim executive council members. The
fifteen were ranked according to the person with the highest votes to the lowest to determine the
number of years they will serve as council members. The top 10 elected members shall serve for two
2
17 voted for Liberato Requioma while 7 voted for Violeta Seva.

28. years while the remaining five plus the additional five to be named by the Executive Council shall serve
for one year. The election results were as follows:
2-YEAR TERM
Ms. Tina Velasco (MMDA)
Mr. Cyrus Ballega (AKKAP Federation, PWD)
Mr. Rally de Leon (Lyon Couriers)
Mr. Quin Cruz (Manggahan Pasig City)
Ms. Vicky Segovia (PCA)
Ms. Karen Crisostomo (Firefly Brigade)
1-YEAR TERM
Ms. Elsie De Veyra (PCA, Senior Citizen)
Mr. Pio Fortuno (Tiklop Society of the Philippines)
Mr. Yeb Saño (Climate Change Commission)
Ms. Louie Golla (Motorcycle Philippines Federation)
Mr. Liberato Requioma (DPWH-NCR)
5 additional members to be determined by the
Council members
Ms. Lalaine Guanzon (Circle of Friends, PWD)
Mr. Ryan Sumo (App Developer)
Ms. Dinna Dayao
Mr. Alberto Suansing
PHOTO 1 The Newly Elected Interim Executive Council
CLOSING REMARKS
Dr. Segundo Romero
As closing remarks, Dr. Romero urged everyone to be tolerant with one another and render respect and
diplomacy in dealing with the other sectors as part of the network. For this big network of organizations
to last longer, conflict should be avoided and patience and democracy must be exercised at all times.

29. The election of government representatives as part of the Executive Council is serendipity because they
have sympathy to CSOs so their role is critical as a balancing act. This is to demonstrate to all
government sector representatives down the road that constructive engagement and true essence of
partnership is the way to go.
He underlined that this is no longer an IM project team output but the project of all members as ideas
come from every member. The IM project team would serve as the Secretariat, which will assist the
rising of the IM Network logistically. He encouraged all to locate their specific advocacies in the big IM
picture for the network to work as a whole.

30. NOMINATION RESULTS
MARGINALIZED
Lalaine Guanzon
(Circle of
Friends, PWD)
Cyrus Ballega
(AKKAP
Federation,
PWD)
Elsie De Veyra
(PCA, Senior
Citizen)
James Velasco
(Ryders with
Disabilities,
PWD)
NOMIN
ATIONS
1
4
1
1
COMMUNITY
ROAD USERS
Pio Fortuno
(Tiklop Society of
the Philippines)
Robert Perillo
(Bulacan
Motorcycle Riders
Federation)
Quin Cruz
(Manggahan
Pasig City)
Erwin Paala
(Families of Road
Victims and
Survivors)
Trina Tolentino
(Operation
Katipunan)
NOMIN
ATIONS
1
MEDIA, NGO,
ACADEME
Benjie Libarnes
(Arangkada)
NOMIN
ATIONS
1
1
Cora Cruz (TSSP)
1
Karlo Robosa (Trip
barker)
1
Liberato Requioma (DPWHNCR)
2
9
Vicky Segovia (PCA)
2
Alberto Suansing
4
Third Espero (LCP)
1
3
Karen Crisostomo
(Firefly Brigade)
2
Ryan Sumo (App
Developer)
1
Violeta Seva (Makati City)
1
3
1
Engr. Gabriel Eusebio
(Marikina Bikeways)
1
Louie Golla
(Motorcycle
Philippines
Federation)
Julia Nebrija (Viva
Manila)
11
Reina Garcia
(Institute for
Climate and
Sustainable Cities)
Chad Osoria (ANSAEAP)
1
Yeb Saño (Climate Change
Commission)
1
Ronald Rodriguez
(Pathways to Higher
Education)
Dinna Dayao
1
Paul Sison (Marikina PIO)
1
2
1
PRIVATE SECTOR
Rally de Leon
(Lyon Couriers)
NOMIN
ATIONS
3
GOVERNMENT SECTOR
Tina Velasco (MMDA)
NOMIN
ATIONS
3

31. ELECTION RESULTS
MARGINALIZED
Cyrus Ballega
(AKKAP
Federation,
PWD)
Lalaine
Guanzon
(Circle of
Friends, PWD)
Elsie De Veyra
(PCA, Senior
Citizen)
James Velasco
(Ryders with
Disabilities,
PWD)
# OF
VOTES
14
COMMUNITY ROAD
USERS
Quin Cruz
(Manggahan Pasig
City)
7
Pio Fortuno (Tiklop
Society of the
Philippines)
5
Karen Crisostomo
(Firefly Brigade)
7
Ryan Sumo (App
Developer)
6
Yeb Saño (Climate
Change Commission)
5
Louie Golla
(Motorcycle
Philippines
Federation)
4
Dinna Dayao
6
Alberto Suansing
5
Liberato Requioma
(DPWH-NCR)
3 (1st
round)
Julia Nebrija (Viva
Manila)
3
Violeta Seva (Makati
City)
17 (2nd
round)
3 (1st
round)
4
# OF
MEDIA, NGO,
VOTES
ACADEME
13
Vicky Segovia (PCA)
Robert Perillo
(Bulacan Motorcycle
Riders Federation)
3
Erwin Paala (Families
of Road Victims and
Survivors)
Trina Tolentino
(Operation
Katipunan)
2
2
Benjie Libarnes
(Arangkada)
# OF
PRIVATE SECTOR
VOTES
9
Rally de Leon (Lyon
Couriers)
2
Karlo Robosa
# OF
GOVERNMENT SECTOR
VOTES
14
Tina Velasco (MMDA)
1
# OF
VOTES
15
4
7 (2nd
round)
2
Reina Garcia
(Institute for Climate
and Sustainable
Cities)
Ronald Rodriguez
(Pathways to Higher
Education)
Cora Cruz (TSSP)
1
Paul Sison (Marikina
PIO)
1
Engr. Gabriel Eusebio
(Marikina Bikeways)
0
0
Third Espero (LCP)
0
Chad Osoria (ANSAEAP)
0

32. RANKING
EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
Tina Velasco (MMDA)
Cyrus Ballega (AKKAP Federation, PWD), Rally de Leon (Lyon Couriers)
Quin Cruz (Manggahan Pasig City)
Vicky Segovia (PCA)
Karen Crisostomo (Firefly Brigade), Lalaine Guanzon (Circle of Friends, PWD)
Ryan Sumo (App Developer), Dinna Dayao
Elsie De Veyra (PCA, Senior Citizen), Pio Fortuno (Tiklop Society of the Philippines), Alberto Suansing
Louie Golla (Motorcycle Philippines Federation), Yeb Saño (Climate Change Commission)
Liberato Requioma (DPWH-NCR)
TOTAL # OF
VOTES
15
14
13
9
7
6
5
4
3
RANK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9