The document discusses three ideas for candidate selection: using academic performance for initial shortlisting, using artificial intelligence or robots to test candidates, and using peer assessment for initial screening. The author believes academic performance is the most practical idea because test scores provide insight into a candidate's aptitude and knowledge. Using AI or robots to select candidates is seen as the most disruptive idea as it could remove human factors from the process. Peer assessment is the author's favorite idea as it allows for a large initial pool, tests candidates' knowledge and group skills, and saves time.

1. Idea Selection
Most practical Idea -Use academic performance as first level shortlist
I think this is very practical idea because every graduate has scores on different subject. The
grad school results are part of continuous process. And one can easily get a good guess about
various qulaities like aptitude, subject knowledge temperament of candidate form academic
performance
Most Disrruptive Idea - Use Artificial intelligence or test Robots to test candidates
I think this is very disruptive because it can almost remove human factor from selection. If
machine could select how good a human is then we can just wonder how future offices may
look like !
My Favorite Idea -Peer Assessment for initial screening
I like this idea because
1. it allows me to have larger pool of candidates through peer assessment I can get good
shortlist.
2. Doing assessment also tests knowledge of candidates
3. It also tell me about how capable they are and how responsible they are in group
4. Saves time