VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...
ICH-GRAEB COMBINATION SCORE IMPROVES OUTCOME PREDICTION IN SPONTANEOUS INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE
1. COMBINATION ICH-GRAEB SCORE
IMPROVES PREDICTION OF
OUTCOME IN SPONTANEOUS
INTRACEREBRALHEMORRHAGE
Saputra A/ Niryana W
Department of Surgery/ Faculty of Medicine Udayana University/
Sanglah General Hospital, Bali
2. Spontaneous
Intracerebral
Hemorrhage
(ICH)
10-15% Morbidity & Mortality
IVH secondary to ICH →
𝟑𝟐% 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡
43% poor functional outcome
DECISION OF SURGERY ?
• Do I need to operate?
• When should to operate?
Prognostic score model
ANATOMICAL &
PHYSIOLOGICAL
4. − Initial ICH volume of 60cc or greater
- Severe Hydrocephalus
- GCS score of 8 or less
- Age 70 years and older
Were INDEPENDENT OUTCOME PREDICTORS.
5. - Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) occurs in nearly
half of patients with spontaneous intracerebral
hemorrhage (ICH)
- Patients with IVH were twice as likely to have a
poor outcome
6. - Elderly patients
- IVH volume
- Acute Hydrocephalus
- Poor initial level of consciousness
SIGNIFICANTLY associated unfavourable prognosis in IVH
group (Graeb score ≥ 𝟔)
7. - Removal of cloth include limitation of inflammation,
edema, and cell death as well as restoration of CSF flow
8. IVH is an independent predictor of poor outcome in ICH
Larger IVH volume and increasing number of affected
ventricles have been associated with worse prognosis
Little is known about the prognostic value of blood
volume in the different parts of the ventricular system
There is correlation of IVH volume in with
outcome in patients with ICH
12. Data prospective observational 88 patients
- Age
- GCS
- ICH Volume
- Outcome (modified Rankin Scale in 30 days)
- Graeb Score, blood in lateral, third and fourth ventricle was
estimated from Head CT scan:
1-4 MILD
5-8 MODERATE
9-12 SEVERE
Analyzed using SPSS 17.0
13. Characteristic Mean
Age, y 56.215.2
GCS 8.63.6
Volume ICH (ml) 45.137.9
Graeb Score 4.64.2
Male
41
59%
Female
29
41%
Gender
21. Prognosis →
Based on decision maker of management
Scoring →
1. to translate the severity of injury into a score
2. allows quantification of severity of injury
3. to predict outcome
22. END POINT:
COMBINATION of anatomical –
physiological create higher
sensitivity and greater validity in
outcome prediction
23. Used in Screening tools of
unfavourable outcome
ICH score ≥ 𝟑
Graeb score ≥ 𝟏
Easy implication on Triage setting
(Accurate, Simple, Applicable and
Reliable)
Spontaneous ICH is 10% to 15% of strokes and related mortality and morbidity world wide
IVH secondary to spontaneous ICH results in: 32% death, 43% poor functional outcome
How about the decision of surgery???
Decision of sugery must be individualized based on patient’s neurologic condition, SIZE & LOCATION of hematoma, Age, & patients’s expressed preference (e.c by living will) and the family wishes.
With prognostic score model based on anatomical and physiological will answer this big question.
This table describe the incidence of risk factors in type of stroke in world wide
There is cardiologic and metabolic comorbids.
Stein et al in 2010
- Initial SICH volume of 60 cm3 or greater
- Severe Hydrocephalus
- GCS score of 8 or less
- Age 70 years and older
Were INDEPENDENT OUTCOME PREDICTORS.
Hallevi in 2008
Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) occurs in nearly half of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)
Patients with IVH were twice as likely to have a poor outcome
Nishikawa et al in 2009
- Elderly patients
IVH volume
Acute Hydrocephalus
Poor initial level of consciousness
SIGNIFICANTLY associated unfavourable prognosis in IVH group (Graeb score ≥𝟔)
Hanley in 2009
Removal of cloth include limitation of inflammation, edema, and cell death as well as restoration of CSF flow
Determination of the prognosis of is important in management, unlike trauma case where stroke has many comorbid factors.
Based on prognostic analysis in there are
-Physiological factors: are Age and GCS which describe intracranial physiology.
-Anatomical factors: Graeb divides degree of brain structural abnormality on IVH, based on CT abnormality
No single scores is perfect, each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Single prognosis is good, and already widely used.
Is Combination has an outcome of prediction value?
Combination in the hope of improving the ability and minimize the limitation.
Hemphill et al in 2001
Component of ICH Score are:
GCS, Volume and origin of ICH, Presence of IVH, and age.
What kind of presence?
How many presence of IVH?
Graeb score is the answer.
Graeb score is a semi quantitative score ranging from 0 to 12
can be measure by reliable, simple, quick and clinical meaningful approximation with simple algebraic calculation.
Unfavourable
0: No symptom
No significant disability
Slight disability
Moderate disability
Moderate severe
Severe
Dead
Based on this ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis to assess the ability of the prediction of ICH score in predicting outcomes, assessed based on the Area Under the Curve (AUC).
a curve is formed above the diagonal line, which means that the lower the value of the parameter (a score of ICH) then the chances of getting a higher unfavourable outcomes Interpretation of the ROC curve,
Formed diagonal line on these curves in the get AUC amounting to 0.7546, This means that a low ICH has a good ability to predict unfavourable outcomes.
The best cut point is determined based on the coordinates of the line furthest from the diagonal and in the get ICH 𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐞≥𝟑
formed diagonal line on these curves in the get AUC amounting to 0.6365, This means that a low IVH has a good ability to predict unfavourable outcomes.
The best cut point is determined based on the coordinates of the line furthest from the diagonal and in the get Graeb score ≥𝟏
Determine the screening in accurately reflected by sensitivity and specificity.
-Ideal screening tools has high validity, shown from high sensitivity and specificity.
-Sensitivity is probability detection (true positif) : How many relevant items are selected.
-Specificity is (True negative): Proportion of actual negative that correctly identified.
-NPV : kemampuan meramalkan , benar2 Fav
-PPV: kemampuan meramalkan, benar2 unFav
Screening can predict the unfavourable outcome, before sign and symptoms of complication appear.
Early management and better outcome.
Best screening should be: Accurate and reliable
-Accurate: The extent to which result match reality
-Reliable is standardized testing: If done repeatedly the result obtained are not much different.
Good screening conditions:
Accurate, simple, applicable and reliable
Reference to clinical management
Family education
Allocation of resources and funds.