SBK with iDesign
Wavefront
David R. Edmison, MD Focus Eye Centre April 30, 2015
iDesign
System key benefits
o High definition sensor maximizes Capture rates
o 5 measurements within a single capture sequence
System clinical trials
Advantages of iDesign Wavefront
aberrometry:
o High definition Hartmann-Schack wavefront
sensor maximizes capture rate.
o Higher dynamic range (-16 to +12D sphere,
up to 8D cylinder)
o Five measurements within single capture
sequence.
iDesign Wavefront
iDesign Wavefront
High definition Hartmann-Schack wavefront sensor.
o Improved spot quality
o (1257 vs 256)
o Better detection of
o highly aberrated eyes.
iDesign WaveScan
iDesign
WaveScan
Five measurements within single capture
sequence.
o Wavefront Guided Aberrometry
o Auto-refraction
o Topography
o Pupillometry
o Keratometry
iDesign Wavefront Guided
Five measurements within single capture
sequence.
o Wavefront aberrometry
o Auto-refraction
o Topography
o Pupillometry
o Keratometry
iDesign Wavefront
Hartmann-Schack image
Five measurements within single capture
sequence.
o Wavefront aberrometry
o Auto-refraction
o Topography
o Pupillometry
o Keratometry
iDesign Wavefront
Fogging target
Five measurements within single capture
sequence.
o Wavefront aberrometry
o Auto-refraction
o Topography
o Pupillometry
o Keratometry
iDesign Wavefront
Axial Map
Elevation Map
Five measurements within single capture
sequence.
– Wavefront aberrometry
– Auto-refraction
– Topography
– Pupillometry
– Keratometry
iDesign Wavefront
Five measurements within single capture
sequence.
– Wavefront aberrometry
– Auto-refraction
– Topography
– Pupillometry
– Keratometry
Five measurements within single capture
sequence.
o Wavefront aberrometry
o Auto-refraction
o Topography
o Pupillometry
o Keratometry
iDesign Wavefront
Superior than Placido Rings (SimK)
iDesign SBK Study Cohort
5 SBK Groups (Dec 11, 2013 to Feb 14, 2014)
(n=318 eyes, 59 excluded for Mv = 259 total)
Group n Sph Cyl SE
-1 to -4D SE 134 -3.03 0.82 -2.62
-4 to -6D SE 65 -5.44 0.89 -5.00
> -6D SE 34 -8.03 1.12 -7.47 *
Mixed Astig 15 -1.42 2.00 -0.42
+0.5 to +3D SE 15 1.12 0.92 1.58
* MMC applied for 30 sec
Study Cohort
Study Parameters
o All eyes treated by 3 surgeons (DE, CM & JC)
o All with iDesign wavefront + Iris Reg.
o Laser room controlled for T & H
o 95-105µm flaps, 8.5mm or 9.0mm diam.
o MMC 0.02% applied for 30 for <-6 D SE group
Post-op
o BCL x 24hrs
o PF q2h x 24 hrs → qid x 4d → bid x 2d → d/c
o Zymar qid x 1week & lubricants
SE(D)
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
Avg SE (D) over Time
3M
-1 to -4 D SE, n=134
-4 to -6 D SE, n=65
> -6 D SE, n=34
1M1W
n=131 n=41 n=30
N=64
n=19
n=15
n=34 n=18 n=12
6M 12M
n=119
n=61
n=29
n=165
N=65
n=34
SE(D)
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
Avg SE (D) over Time
Mixed astig, n=15
+0.5 to +3 D SE, n=15
n=3n=5
n=3n=15
n=5
3M1M1W 6M 12M
n=12
n=15
n=12N=14
n=1
5
SBK UCVA (-1 to -4 D SE)
SBK UCVA (-4 to -6 D SE)
SBK UCVA (> -6 D SE)
SBK UCVA (Mixed astig)
SBK UCVA (+0.5 to +3 D SE)
Predictability at 3 Mths
0
20
40
60
80
100
%ofEyes
+1 to +2 +1 to +0.5 +0.37 to -0.37 -0.5 to -1 -1 to -2
-1 to -4 D SE
-4 to -6 D SE
< -6 D SE
mixed astig
Over response (D) Under response (D)
Predictability at 3 Mths
0
20
40
60
80
100
-1 to -2 -0.5 to -1 +0.37 to -
0.37
+1 to +0.5 +1 to +2
%ofEyes
+0.5 to +2 D SE
Over response (D) Under response (D)
3 months Mean SE 20/20 20/25
-1 to -4D SE -0.05 ± 0.16 D 90% 100%
-4 to -6D SE -0.03 ± 0.28 D 87% 95%
> -6D SE -0.38 ± 0.49 D 33% 72%
Mixed astig -0.42 ± 0.58 D 70% 85%
+0.5 to +3D SE -0.14 ± 0.36 D 86% 100%
Nomogram adjustments under study.
– high myopia and mixed.
Need to analyze PRK & Mv results.
Summary
UCVA
3 months 20/20 20/25 20/20 20/25
iDesign WaveScan
-1 to -4D SE 90% 100% 85% 96%
-4 to -6D SE 87% 95% 81% 93%
> -6D SE 33%* 72%* 44% 71%
Mixed astig 70% 85% 65% 80%
+0.5 to +3D SE 86% 100% 69% 85%
Summary
UCVA
* Small sample size
THANK YOU

Focus Co Management Session - Dr. Edmison April 2015

  • 1.
    SBK with iDesign Wavefront DavidR. Edmison, MD Focus Eye Centre April 30, 2015
  • 2.
    iDesign System key benefits oHigh definition sensor maximizes Capture rates o 5 measurements within a single capture sequence System clinical trials
  • 3.
    Advantages of iDesignWavefront aberrometry: o High definition Hartmann-Schack wavefront sensor maximizes capture rate. o Higher dynamic range (-16 to +12D sphere, up to 8D cylinder) o Five measurements within single capture sequence. iDesign Wavefront
  • 4.
    iDesign Wavefront High definitionHartmann-Schack wavefront sensor. o Improved spot quality o (1257 vs 256) o Better detection of o highly aberrated eyes. iDesign WaveScan iDesign WaveScan
  • 5.
    Five measurements withinsingle capture sequence. o Wavefront Guided Aberrometry o Auto-refraction o Topography o Pupillometry o Keratometry iDesign Wavefront Guided
  • 6.
    Five measurements withinsingle capture sequence. o Wavefront aberrometry o Auto-refraction o Topography o Pupillometry o Keratometry iDesign Wavefront Hartmann-Schack image
  • 7.
    Five measurements withinsingle capture sequence. o Wavefront aberrometry o Auto-refraction o Topography o Pupillometry o Keratometry iDesign Wavefront Fogging target
  • 8.
    Five measurements withinsingle capture sequence. o Wavefront aberrometry o Auto-refraction o Topography o Pupillometry o Keratometry iDesign Wavefront Axial Map Elevation Map
  • 9.
    Five measurements withinsingle capture sequence. – Wavefront aberrometry – Auto-refraction – Topography – Pupillometry – Keratometry iDesign Wavefront Five measurements within single capture sequence. – Wavefront aberrometry – Auto-refraction – Topography – Pupillometry – Keratometry
  • 10.
    Five measurements withinsingle capture sequence. o Wavefront aberrometry o Auto-refraction o Topography o Pupillometry o Keratometry iDesign Wavefront Superior than Placido Rings (SimK)
  • 11.
    iDesign SBK StudyCohort 5 SBK Groups (Dec 11, 2013 to Feb 14, 2014) (n=318 eyes, 59 excluded for Mv = 259 total) Group n Sph Cyl SE -1 to -4D SE 134 -3.03 0.82 -2.62 -4 to -6D SE 65 -5.44 0.89 -5.00 > -6D SE 34 -8.03 1.12 -7.47 * Mixed Astig 15 -1.42 2.00 -0.42 +0.5 to +3D SE 15 1.12 0.92 1.58 * MMC applied for 30 sec
  • 12.
    Study Cohort Study Parameters oAll eyes treated by 3 surgeons (DE, CM & JC) o All with iDesign wavefront + Iris Reg. o Laser room controlled for T & H o 95-105µm flaps, 8.5mm or 9.0mm diam. o MMC 0.02% applied for 30 for <-6 D SE group Post-op o BCL x 24hrs o PF q2h x 24 hrs → qid x 4d → bid x 2d → d/c o Zymar qid x 1week & lubricants
  • 13.
    SE(D) -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 Avg SE (D)over Time 3M -1 to -4 D SE, n=134 -4 to -6 D SE, n=65 > -6 D SE, n=34 1M1W n=131 n=41 n=30 N=64 n=19 n=15 n=34 n=18 n=12 6M 12M n=119 n=61 n=29 n=165 N=65 n=34
  • 14.
    SE(D) -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 Avg SE (D)over Time Mixed astig, n=15 +0.5 to +3 D SE, n=15 n=3n=5 n=3n=15 n=5 3M1M1W 6M 12M n=12 n=15 n=12N=14 n=1 5
  • 15.
    SBK UCVA (-1to -4 D SE)
  • 16.
    SBK UCVA (-4to -6 D SE)
  • 17.
    SBK UCVA (>-6 D SE)
  • 18.
  • 19.
    SBK UCVA (+0.5to +3 D SE)
  • 20.
    Predictability at 3Mths 0 20 40 60 80 100 %ofEyes +1 to +2 +1 to +0.5 +0.37 to -0.37 -0.5 to -1 -1 to -2 -1 to -4 D SE -4 to -6 D SE < -6 D SE mixed astig Over response (D) Under response (D)
  • 21.
    Predictability at 3Mths 0 20 40 60 80 100 -1 to -2 -0.5 to -1 +0.37 to - 0.37 +1 to +0.5 +1 to +2 %ofEyes +0.5 to +2 D SE Over response (D) Under response (D)
  • 22.
    3 months MeanSE 20/20 20/25 -1 to -4D SE -0.05 ± 0.16 D 90% 100% -4 to -6D SE -0.03 ± 0.28 D 87% 95% > -6D SE -0.38 ± 0.49 D 33% 72% Mixed astig -0.42 ± 0.58 D 70% 85% +0.5 to +3D SE -0.14 ± 0.36 D 86% 100% Nomogram adjustments under study. – high myopia and mixed. Need to analyze PRK & Mv results. Summary UCVA
  • 23.
    3 months 20/2020/25 20/20 20/25 iDesign WaveScan -1 to -4D SE 90% 100% 85% 96% -4 to -6D SE 87% 95% 81% 93% > -6D SE 33%* 72%* 44% 71% Mixed astig 70% 85% 65% 80% +0.5 to +3D SE 86% 100% 69% 85% Summary UCVA * Small sample size
  • 24.

Editor's Notes

  • #4 Focus Co-Management Workshop- June 4 and June 9 2008
  • #23 Focus Co-Management Workshop- June 4 and June 9 2008
  • #24 Focus Co-Management Workshop- June 4 and June 9 2008