Hypothesis based typologies for capturing diversity
Stephanie Alvarez, Wim Paas, Katrien Descheemaeker, Jeroen Groot
Wageningen University, Farming Systems Ecology & Plant Production Systems groups
Humidtropics
Aim of typologies:
- Capture variability of farming systems
- Understand heterogeneity in regions
Introduction
Hengsdijk et al., 2014; N2Africa report – 2 action sites in Kenya
Franke et al., 2014
Aim of typologies:
- Capture variability of farming systems
- Understand heterogeneity in regions
For
1. Targeting and tailoring
2. Scaling out; dissemination
3. Selection of representative farms
4. Scaling up; extrapolate to larger scale
Introduction
Major steps:
1. What is the objective?
2. Hypothesis on farming systems
diversity
3. Data collection
4. Selection of key variables
5. Clustering the farms
6. Hypothesis and typology verification
Overall:
Combine expert knowledge from
participatory work with statistical
analysis
Guidelines
Major steps:
1. What is the objective?
Specific: Improve forage production in
mixed systems of Rwanda
Broad: Improve food security in the
humid tropics
Guidelines
Major steps:
2. Hypothesis on farming systems
diversity
Participatory process for ex-ante
description of farm types ; identification
of discriminating criteria
Guidelines
Major steps:
3. Data collection
4. Selection of key variables
Variable categories:
- Structural vs. functional characteristics
- Resource availability vs. management
- Biophysical vs. socio-economic
- Farm vs. external
key variables: 5 - 46, av. 15
sampled farms: 18 – 2746, av. 138
#farms > 5 * #variables
Guidelines
Major steps:
5. Clustering the farms
Guidelines
Major steps:
5. Clustering the farming systems
a. Multivariate statistics
(PCA, MCA, MFA)
Discriminating variables
Guidelines
Guidelines
Major steps:
5. Clustering the farming systems
a. Multivariate statistics
(PCA, MCA, MFA)
Discriminating variables
b. Cluster analysis
Major steps:
6. Hypothesis and typology verification
Guidelines
Major steps:
6. Hypothesis and typology verification
Example from Ghana – participatory and statistical approach
Guidelines
Poster, Katja Kuivanen et al.
Major steps:
1. What is the objective?
2. Hypothesis on farming systems
diversity
3. Data collection
4. Selection of key variables
5. Clustering the farms
6. Hypothesis and typology verification
Guidelines
coffee >35%
grazing land>20%
khat>30%
enset>35%
Classification trees and trends
Homegarden types in Ethiopia
Khat Enset-
cereal
Enset Enset-
coffee
Enset-
livestock
Khat Enset-
cereal
Enset Enset-
coffee
Enset-
livestock
Areashareofkhat(%)
Areashareofcoffee(%)
Khat Enset-
cereal
Enset Enset-
coffee
Enset-
livestock
Areashareofenset(%)
Areashareofgrazingland(%)
Khat Enset-
cereal
Enset Enset-
coffee
Enset-
livestock
Farms
4 types
Enset-coffee
3 types
Enset-
livestock
2 types
Enset-cereal-
vegetable
Enset
Khat
khat
>30%
coffee
>35%
Grazing
land>20%
Enset
>35%
1991 2013 20132 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 1 12 1 12 12 12 12 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 44444 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 34 34 34 3 54 3 54 3 54 3 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 55553 2 53 2 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 43 43 43 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 22225 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 3 25 3 25 35 35 45 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 33331 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 3
Enset
Enset-
livestock
Enset-
coffee
Enset-
cereal-
vegetable
Khat
1991 2013 20132 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 1 12 1 12 12 12 12 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 44444 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 34 34 34 3 54 3 54 3 54 3 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 55553 2 53 2 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 43 43 43 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 22225 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 3 25 3 25 35 35 45 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 33331 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 3
Khat
Enset-
livestock
Enset-
cereal-
vegetable
Enset
Enset-
coffee
Classification trees and trends
31%
30%
19%
17%
3%
24%
24%
21%
18%
13%
Spatial organization of farm types
Type Main characteristics
1 HRE, large cattle herd, ample off-farm activities
2 MRE, large farms, market orientation
3 MRE, small ruminants, on-farm labour intensive
4 MRE, small ruminants, ample hired labour
5 LRE, maize dominated, few off-farm activities
6 SRC, livestock sales, ample off-farm activities
Katja Kuivanen
Small & medium farms
Small ruminants
Market oriented
farms
High resource
endowed farms
Statistical background and examples
Appendix C of the report
R code to explore the data and run the analysis
Tips for interpretation of statistical results
Conclusions
Typology guidelines: 6 steps, no recipe book
Interpretation of results ; degree of subjectivity
Combine statistical methods with participatory work
Thank you
https://humidtropics.cgiar.org/constructing-typologies-to-capture-farming-systems-diversity
http://humidtropics.cgiar.org/openaccess/?did=231

Hypothesis based typologies for capturing diversity

  • 1.
    Hypothesis based typologiesfor capturing diversity Stephanie Alvarez, Wim Paas, Katrien Descheemaeker, Jeroen Groot Wageningen University, Farming Systems Ecology & Plant Production Systems groups Humidtropics
  • 2.
    Aim of typologies: -Capture variability of farming systems - Understand heterogeneity in regions Introduction Hengsdijk et al., 2014; N2Africa report – 2 action sites in Kenya Franke et al., 2014
  • 3.
    Aim of typologies: -Capture variability of farming systems - Understand heterogeneity in regions For 1. Targeting and tailoring 2. Scaling out; dissemination 3. Selection of representative farms 4. Scaling up; extrapolate to larger scale Introduction
  • 4.
    Major steps: 1. Whatis the objective? 2. Hypothesis on farming systems diversity 3. Data collection 4. Selection of key variables 5. Clustering the farms 6. Hypothesis and typology verification Overall: Combine expert knowledge from participatory work with statistical analysis Guidelines
  • 5.
    Major steps: 1. Whatis the objective? Specific: Improve forage production in mixed systems of Rwanda Broad: Improve food security in the humid tropics Guidelines
  • 6.
    Major steps: 2. Hypothesison farming systems diversity Participatory process for ex-ante description of farm types ; identification of discriminating criteria Guidelines
  • 7.
    Major steps: 3. Datacollection 4. Selection of key variables Variable categories: - Structural vs. functional characteristics - Resource availability vs. management - Biophysical vs. socio-economic - Farm vs. external key variables: 5 - 46, av. 15 sampled farms: 18 – 2746, av. 138 #farms > 5 * #variables Guidelines
  • 8.
    Major steps: 5. Clusteringthe farms Guidelines
  • 9.
    Major steps: 5. Clusteringthe farming systems a. Multivariate statistics (PCA, MCA, MFA) Discriminating variables Guidelines
  • 10.
    Guidelines Major steps: 5. Clusteringthe farming systems a. Multivariate statistics (PCA, MCA, MFA) Discriminating variables b. Cluster analysis
  • 11.
    Major steps: 6. Hypothesisand typology verification Guidelines
  • 12.
    Major steps: 6. Hypothesisand typology verification Example from Ghana – participatory and statistical approach Guidelines Poster, Katja Kuivanen et al.
  • 13.
    Major steps: 1. Whatis the objective? 2. Hypothesis on farming systems diversity 3. Data collection 4. Selection of key variables 5. Clustering the farms 6. Hypothesis and typology verification Guidelines
  • 14.
    coffee >35% grazing land>20% khat>30% enset>35% Classificationtrees and trends Homegarden types in Ethiopia Khat Enset- cereal Enset Enset- coffee Enset- livestock Khat Enset- cereal Enset Enset- coffee Enset- livestock Areashareofkhat(%) Areashareofcoffee(%) Khat Enset- cereal Enset Enset- coffee Enset- livestock Areashareofenset(%) Areashareofgrazingland(%) Khat Enset- cereal Enset Enset- coffee Enset- livestock
  • 15.
    Farms 4 types Enset-coffee 3 types Enset- livestock 2types Enset-cereal- vegetable Enset Khat khat >30% coffee >35% Grazing land>20% Enset >35%
  • 16.
    1991 2013 201322 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 1 12 1 12 12 12 12 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 44444 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 34 34 34 3 54 3 54 3 54 3 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 55553 2 53 2 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 43 43 43 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 22225 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 3 25 3 25 35 35 45 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 33331 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 3 Enset Enset- livestock Enset- coffee Enset- cereal- vegetable Khat 1991 2013 20132 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 1 12 1 12 12 12 12 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 44444 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 2 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 5 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 3 44 34 34 34 3 54 3 54 3 54 3 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 4 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 54 1 55553 2 53 2 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 5 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 3 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 4 53 43 43 43 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 4 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 22225 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 2 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 3 25 3 25 35 35 45 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 4 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 33331 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 31 1 3 Khat Enset- livestock Enset- cereal- vegetable Enset Enset- coffee Classification trees and trends 31% 30% 19% 17% 3% 24% 24% 21% 18% 13%
  • 17.
    Spatial organization offarm types Type Main characteristics 1 HRE, large cattle herd, ample off-farm activities 2 MRE, large farms, market orientation 3 MRE, small ruminants, on-farm labour intensive 4 MRE, small ruminants, ample hired labour 5 LRE, maize dominated, few off-farm activities 6 SRC, livestock sales, ample off-farm activities Katja Kuivanen Small & medium farms Small ruminants Market oriented farms High resource endowed farms
  • 18.
    Statistical background andexamples Appendix C of the report R code to explore the data and run the analysis Tips for interpretation of statistical results
  • 19.
    Conclusions Typology guidelines: 6steps, no recipe book Interpretation of results ; degree of subjectivity Combine statistical methods with participatory work
  • 20.