Group/Presentation Title
Agilent Restricted
Month ##, 200XPage 1
High-Tech and Electronics Logistics and Supply
Chain Management Conference
Peter Woon
Director, Global Sourcing
Agilent Technologies
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March,
2006
“Winning through Innovation”
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 2
Presentation
Part I : Introduction to Agilent Technologies
Part II : SRM in Agilent
• Business Needs for a common SRM Model
• SRM Components
– Stratification
– Governance
– Performance Measurement
– Supplier Development
• Benefits of implementing SRM program
Q&A Session
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 3
Agilent’s Focus
Communications
Electronics
Life Sciences and
Chemical Analysis
Our goal is to strengthen Agilent’s position as
the world’s premier measurement company
Agilent provides core electronic and bio-
analytical measurement tools to advance the
electronics, communications, life sciences,
research, environmental, and petrochemical
industries
Agilent’s Overview
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 4
Agilent Around the World
• Customers in more
than 110 countries
• More than 60% of
revenue generated
outside U.S.
• Global manufacturing
and R&D
Agilent Facts
$ 5.1 billion (exclude SPG)Net revenue (FY05)
Employees 21,000 employees
Headquarters Palo Alto, California
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 5
Bio-Analytical
Measurement
Electronic
Measurement
Semiconductor
Test Solutions
$1.42B$3.27B $0.45B
Agilent Businesses
The world’s premier measurement company
Total FY05 GAAP Revenue of $5.1 billion excludes revenues from Agilent’s Semiconductor Products Group.
Shared Infrastructure
Agilent Laboratories
Global Infrastructural
Organization Global functional
support teams Sourcing,
Finance, Information
Technology, Human
Resources, Workplace
Services, Legal, Trade and
Tax etc
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 6
Agilent FY05 Revenue by End Markets
Chemical Analysis
Life Sciences
Wireless
Wireline
General purpose test
Semiconductor Test
This represents GAAP figures and excludes the revenues of
Agilent’s Semiconductor Products Group.
12%
34%
6%
23%
9%
16%
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 7
Agilent Around the World
• Customers in more than
110 countries
• More than 60% of revenue
generated outside U.S.
• Global manufacturing
and R&D
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 8
FY05 Net Revenue by Geography
38%
39%
23%
Total GAAP revenue of $5.1 billion excludes the revenues of
Agilent’s Semiconductor Products Group.
Americas
$1.96B
Asia Pacific
$1.98B
Europe
$1.20B
100%=$5.14B
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 9
Agilent’s Industry-Leading Customers
Astra Zeneca
Aventis
BASF AG
Bayer AG
Boehringer Ingelheim
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
DuPont
Dow Chemical
Exxon-Mobil
Eli Lilly
GlaxoSmithKline
Merck
National Cancer Institute
Nestle
Novartis
Pfizer
U.S. Army, FDA, EPA, NIH
Alcatel
Cisco
Ericsson
Flextronics
Fujitsu
Huawei
IBM
LG
Lockheed
Lucent
Motorola
NEC
Nokia
NTT
Orange
Samsung
SBC
Singtel
Sprint
Verizon
Life Sciences and Chemical AnalysisElectronic Measurement
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 10
Presentation
Part I : Introduction to Agilent Technologies
Part II : SRM in Agilent
• Business Needs for a common SRM Model
• SRM Components
– Stratification
– Governance
– Performance Measurement
– Supplier Development
• Benefits of implementing SRM Program
Q&A Session
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 11
Business need for a common SRM Model
• Agilent has realized significant savings and other benefits from outsourcing
services previously delivered in-house
• Increased reliance on external providers has made effective Supplier
Relationship Management (SRM) critical
• However, Agilent has lacked a common model and results-oriented
approach for optimizing supplier relationship management
− Each function had defined its own approaches, tools, and processes for SRM
− Agilent had not fully transitioned from people management to SLA management
− Roles and responsibilities for SRM had not been clearly defined, reducing
effectiveness and proliferating “vendor managers”
• As a result, there were clear business need to design and implement a
common SRM model to enable leveraging a COMMON process and methodology
across the supply base.
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 12
Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) provides a framework for
managing supplier interactions throughout the entire supplier relationship
lifecycle
The Agilent Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) Model:
Supplier
Development
Performance
Management
SRM
Governance
Supplier
Stratification
SRM Definition & Best Practices
SRM Systems
• Supplier Stratification
Definition
• Supplier Stratification
Expectations
• Supplier Stratification
Execution
• Capability and Functionality
Needs Analysis
• SRM Model Definition
• Teams, Roles and
Competencies
Definition
• Ongoing
Governance
Management
• SRM Adoption
Management
• Performance
Management Definition
• Performance
Management Tool
Development
• Ongoing Supplier
Performance
Management
• Supplier Development
Needs Definition
• Supplier Development
Program Definition
• Ongoing Supplier
Development
• Systems Selection and
Deployment
• Best Practices
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 13
Components of Supplier Stratification
Supplier Stratification
Supplier
Stratification
Definition
Supplier
Stratification
Expectations
Supplier
Stratification
Execution
Definition of supplier
tiers
Characteristics of
supplier tiers
Expectations by
supplier tier
Supply Base
guidelines
Stratification
criteria
Stratification
process
Stratification
tools
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 14
Supplier stratification process
One of the key activities in the Supplier Relationship Management (SRM)
effort was to stratify suppliers in the areas like HR, WPS, IT and Marketing
etc.
Supplier Stratification was required to effectively prioritized supplier
relationship management focus on strategic and core suppliers
The stratification exercise also revealed that approx 30% of the spend $$$
were with the “tail” of ~4,400 basic suppliers across the areas
Agilent has an opportunity to realize savings in the short term by rationalizing
suppliers in specific target categories where significant savings opportunities
exist
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 15
IT, WPS, HR, and Marketing, all categories where SRM is underway, each have a
long supplier “tail”
The “tail”:
• Average of 30+% of spend
• ~4,400 suppliers (98%)
Spend
# Suppliers
IT
WPS
HR
Marketing 60%
14 800+
80%
29
55%
16
80%
25
2,300+
650
800+
Supplier tail in each function represents opportunity for rationalizing
suppliers in specific sub-categories where significant savings are possible
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 16
Transactional Suppliers
Enterprise
Partners
Strategic Suppliers
Core Suppliers
Transactional Suppliers
Enterprise
Partners
Strategic Suppliers
Core Suppliers
Transactional Suppliers
Enterprise
Partners
Strategic Suppliers
Core Suppliers
Transactional Suppliers
Enterprise
Partners
Strategic Suppliers
Core Suppliers
Strategic
Suppliers
Core Suppliers
Basic Suppliers
Stratification Tiers and Characteristics
Strategic Suppliers:
Critical to operations of functional group(s) and to long-term
functional goals
Require significant functional resources and investment
Core Suppliers:
Important to operations of functional group(s) and to long-term
functional goals
Potential incremental value from developing ongoing
relationship
Difficult to replace
Basic Suppliers:
Short-term, transactional relationships
Minimal investment
Purely cost-driven performance management
Do Not Do Business With
Strategic Company-Wide Partners:
Qualified as Strategic Supplier
Multi-dimensional relationship (multi-function, buy-sell, etc.)
Typically require high levels of cross-functional resources and
investment
Do Not Do Business With: List of suppliers with whom Agilent
has elected not to do business
80%
Financial
Value
20%
Financial
Value
Strategic
Company-
Wide Partners
The first three supplier tiers are determined at the Function level, allowing for flexibility. The highest tier is
determined across Functions, providing a company-wide perspective.
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 17
Relationship Model
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 18
Components of SRM Governance
SRM Governance
Teams, Roles,
and
Competencies
Definition
Ongoing
Governance
Management
SRM Adoption
Management
SRM Team structure by
strata
SRM roles and
responsibilities
SRM competencies
definition
SRM competency
assessment and
development process
SRM review
structure and
processes
Day-to-day supplier
management
processes
Escalation process
Process and tools
for measurement
of SRM adoption
and effectiveness
Ongoing process to
incorporate
feedback
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 19
Teams responsible for managing supplier relationships the team
objectives
Operations Management Team
Executive
Management
Team
Assess supplier operational performance
Assess financial performance
Analyze and address escalation issues
Assess supplier operational performance
Develop suppliers to resolve capability gaps
Discuss new capabilities
Partner with program managers and content
experts
Assess supplier financial
performance
Manage supplier contracts and
service level agreements
Manage new supplier services and
change order requirements
Business Office
SRM
Lead
Lead internal SRM team collaboration and Assist with interactions
with suppliers and business partners
Ongoing Operational Activities
SupplierRelationshipManagement(SRM)Operations
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 20
What are the structure and roles of current SRM teams?
Operations Management Team
Executive
Management
Team
Business Office
SRM Lead
Ongoing Operational Activities
SupplierRelationshipManagement(SRM)Operations
Supplier
Personnel
Agilent
Personnel
Ops Mgmt. Lead
Financial
Performance Mgmt.
Contract /Sourcing
Management
Relationship Risk
Mgmt.
Communications
Management
Legal & Audit
Support
Client Relationship
Mgmt. Lead
Sales Relationship
Core
Support
Delivery
Management Project Management Transition
Management
Performance
Management
Supplier
Development Mgmt.
Customer
Satisfaction Mgmt.
Escalation
Management
Other Supplier Team
Members
Other Supplier
Leads
Agilent Executive
Sponsor Other Executive(s) Client Relationship
Sponsor
SRM Lead
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 21
Components of Performance Management
Performance
Management
Definition
Performance Management
Performance
Management
Tool
Development
Ongoing
Performance
Management
Performance Management
components and process
definition
Performance Management
team roles and
responsibilities
Performance Management
goals and objectives
Performance Management
review structure and
processes
Day-to-day metric tracking
and supplier
communication
Escalation process and
management of supplier
accountability
Supplier objective and KPI alignment
with Functional goals and targets
SLA visibility and management
Performance tracking tools:
• Scorecards
• Supplier Metrics Registers
• Action Items
• Supplier Surveys
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 22
KPI Deinfition Example Delivery System Owner
Average spend per mile in period $0.33 / flight mile in 1Q04 BTI feed Travel SRM Mngr
rental $ daily rate over period $74 / day in May 03 Hertz download Travel SRM Mngr
Online Booking Tool
Operational Savings
Net $ savings due to online
booking $102,000 saved in 1Q04 Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr
Average Cost per Hotel night
booked
Average cost over all hotel
nights book through Travel $123.24 / night Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr
BTI Agency Costs $389,000 in 1Q04 BTI feed BTI
Average Domestic Ticket Price Average price over period $469 Finance feed BTI
Price Average price over period $824 Finance feed BTI
Business vs. First class metric
Ratio of first class to business
tickets issued during period 0.21 in FY02 BTI feed Travel SRM Mngr
Average spend per mile by
airline Average spend by airline over period
$0.31 / flight mile on
AirAgilent Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr
Function KPI Catalog
KPI Deinfition Example Delivery System Owner
Average spend per mile in period $0.33 / flight mile in 1Q04 BTI feed Travel SRM Mngr
rental $ daily rate over period $74 / day in May 03 Hertz download Travel SRM Mngr
Online Booking Tool
Operational Savings
Net $ savings due to online
booking $102,000 saved in 1Q04 Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr
Average Cost per Hotel night
booked
Average cost over all hotel
nights book through Travel $123.24 / night Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr
BTI Agency Costs $389,000 in 1Q04 BTI feed BTI
Average Domestic Ticket Price Average price over period $469 Finance feed BTI
Price Average price over period $824 Finance feed BTI
Business vs. First class metric
Ratio of first class to business
tickets issued during period 0.21 in FY02 BTI feed Travel SRM Mngr
Average spend per mile by
airline Average spend by airline over period
$0.31 / flight mile on
AirAgilent Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr
Function KPI CatalogFunction Supply KPI Catalog
Re f # Action Ite m Ow ner Priority
D ate
Identified D ate D ue St atus N otes / C om m ents
Gov-a-0 24 R eview over all co ntr act in dic ato r (yellow v s.
red) on B. sco recard an d dashb oard
D oug K nigh t /
V innie E gizi
Low 3-D ec -0 3 15-A pr-0 4 O pen
3/17: A gile nt content with curren t - will re vie w in
April
Gov-a-0 25 R e-evaluate weights on B . sc oreca rd D oug K nigh t /
V innie E gizi Low 3-D ec -0 3 15-A pr-0 4 O pen
HP reco m m endatio n provided - need a pproval
from D oug . 3 /17: A gilent con tent w ith curren t - will
rev iew in A pril
Gov-a-0 30 A ss ess if TQ RD C E is be st approa ch to
m e asuring c us tom er sa tisfac tion
D oug K nigh t
M e d 3-D ec -0 3 28-A pr-0 4 C los ed
3/17: A dditional q ue stio ns to be integrate d and
pro vid ed to larger a udienc e.
Gov-a-0 31 R eview and ag re e on on-g oing c ontent
require m ents for G ove rn an ce m ateria ls (e.g.,
freq uenc y of tower “d eep div es”)
D oug K nigh t /
V innie E gizi /
K im N utter
M e d 13-Feb-04 15-A pr-0 4 C los ed new m eeting struc ture es tablis hed s pecific to
conten t requirem ents .
Gov-a-3 3 P rovid e m ore detailed defin ition o f what
c onstitu tes a n IM A C S cott Cobe rn us
M e d 17-M ar-04 23-A pr-0 4 Can celle d
m erge d with item # gov-a-40
Gov-a-3 4 E valu ate pre-paym ent options an d provide
A gile nt feedba ck.
Tim K raem er
M e d 17-M ar-04 24-M a r-04 C los ed
3/19: C IBC ad jus ted base line s eas onally. 4/2 : not
easy - req uires a lot of ac cr ua ls an d deferrals. S o
poss ible bu t want to avoid. Tim to fo rm ally
com m u nicate to Vinnie/D oug. 4 /16: Tim m ade
rec om m end ation to not do this.
Gov-a-3 5 A ss ociated entities listin g/E x hibit 7 D ale
H oppenrath
M e d 3-M ar-04 31-M a r-04 C los ed
4/2: rec eived new ex hibit 7 / new s ite listin g
Gov-a-3 6 A gree to process to a ttain brea ch ite m
c losur e (i.e., s ig n-off th at co ntractual
de liverable req’ts have be en m e t).
V inc ent E gizi,
D oug K nigh t
M e d 24-M ar-04 30-A pr-0 4 O pen 4/16: m eetin g s che duled 4 /28/04. M ichelle pulling
data
Gov-a-3 7 A ss ess how to m ak e the CLM inventor y
pipe line v isible Jo hn M elin
M e d 24-M ar-04 30-A pr-0 4 O pen
Gov-a-3 8 E xp lo re leve ra ge poin ts from A ltiris
V inc ent E gizi
M e d 24-M ar-04 29-M ay-0 4 O pen
4/2: onc e ass et m gt is stable HP w ill lo ok at this.
Gov-a-3 9 R eprese nt break -fix as p ercentag e that hit
on e d ay vs. the avera ge
Jo hn M elin,
Gre g C offey
M e d 24-M ar-04 28-A pr-0 4 C los ed
Action Item Registers
Execution of Performance Management
Align metrics to Function objectives and targets
Align metrics to contract SLAs
Define KPIs, performance targets and contractual
consequences
Apply scorecards and dashboards to report KPIs at different levels
Use Action Item Register to track and escalate issue resolution
Apply other tools to manage overall KPI List and supplier
commitments
Report supplier performance based on strata frequency requirements
Manage ongoing issue identification and resolution
Provide performance inputs to Supplier Reviews
Resolve performance issues
Provide rewards/incentives to suppliers exceeding
performance targets
Penalize and/or eliminate underperforming suppliers
Function
Function
Supplier
Owner
Survey rating score
Weekly system utilization
Percent of system uptime
Definition SourceKPI
SurveyUser satisfaction
Oracle monitorCapacity Utilization
System logUptime
Supplier Evaluation Scorecard
Category Manager <Name>, GS Grade
Account Manager <Name>, Supplier Good
Completion Date Fair
Poor
Fill Rate % >=92 94-92 <=94 95.3 97.0 97.0 97.0 96.4 93.0 99.0 99.0 94.7 96.4
Monthly Turnover Rate % <=5 5-10 >=10 8.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Preventable Turnover Rate % <=5 5-10 >=10 7.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Account Management Account Management Quality Rating 1-3 3 2 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Invoice Timeliness Days late <=0 0-5 >=5 2.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Invoice Accuracy
% Variance
of Total Bill
<=0 0-2 >=2 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.5
Reporting Timeliness Days late <=0 0-5 >=5 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.7 0.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Reporting Accuracy
Reporting
Errors
<=0 0-3 >=3 1.7 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.6 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1
On-site Management Quality Score 1-5 >=3.5 2-3.5 <=2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Temporary Associate Quality Score 1-5 >=3.5 2-3.5 <=2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Update Meeting Quality Rating 1-3 3 2 1
Improvement Feedback Quality Rating 1-3 3 2 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
<Name>
<Name>
<Name>
Omaha
Q1 Q2 Q3
Annual
Average
Q2 Q4
<Name>Company Functional Managers
Supplier On-Site Managers
Representatives
Base Evaluation
Metrics
Survey Results
QuarterlyMetrics
Reporting and
Invoicing
Quarterly Reviews
Q3
Comments / Action Items
Metric Units Good
Fair
(between
range)
Poor
Annual
Average
Fort Worth
Q1
Definition
Meets or exceeds requirements
Nearly meets requirements, improvement needed within one month
Fails to meet requirements
Annual Scorecard By Quarter and Location
Evaluation Category
MonthlyMetrics
Evaluation Criteria
Q4
Metrics Tools
Ongoing Measurement Outcomes
Scorecards & Dashboards
Incentives / Rewards
Penalties
Elimination
Incentives / Rewards
Penalties
Elimination
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 23
Components of Supplier Development
Supplier
Development
Needs Definition
Supplier Development
Supplier
Development
Program
Definition
Ongoing
Supplier
Development
Supplier Development
goals and objectives
Supplier Development
benefits
Supplier Development
challenges and needs
Supplier Development Program
objectives
Supplier Development Program
components and process
definition
Supplier Development Program
implementation techniques
Supplier Development
team roles and
responsibilities
Supplier Development
stratification impact
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 24
Supplier Development challenges and needs
Development NeedsSupplier Relationship Challenges
Continuous
Improvement
• Corporate/Functional objectives require year-on-year cost
and/or service level improvements
• Competition drives need to identify and implement best
practices
• Ineffective processes and systems in relationship drive
increased costs and reduce performance
Examples
Capability Gap
Closure
• Supplier does not offer the services and/or products that
Agilent needs
• Supplier does not have the global capabilities to meet
Agilent objectives
• Supplier has capabilities that require further development
to meet Agilent requirements
• HR service provider
lacked the employee
services functionality
required
• TBD
Value Creation
• Few contracts encourage suppliers to identify
opportunities to add value to Agilent
• Lack of process to identify new value creation ideas
• Lack of incentives for suppliers to identify new
opportunities
• Logistics Function
sought creative
approaches for
additional cost savings
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 25
Benefits of implementing SRM
Increased supplier performance
visibility and accountability
Aligned Corporate, Functional, and
Supplier objectives
Streamlined governance activities with
a “Single Agilent Face” to suppliers
Stratified supply base and greater
visibility into supply relationship
priorities and criticality
Immediate Impacts of SRM
Year-on-year cost-reductions and
continuous performance improvement
Supplier agreements support business
performance and extract maximum
supplier value
Realization of internal efficiencies and
reduction in supply management costs
Stronger and more strategic supplier
relationships with reduced supply
costs and risks
Long-Term Benefits of SRM
HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March 2006
Agilent Technologies
Page 26
Presentation
Part I : Introduction to Agilent Technologies
Part II : SRM in Agilent
• Business Needs for a common SRM Model
• SRM Components
– Stratification
– Governance
– Performance Measurement
– Supplier Development
• Benefits of SRM program
Q&A Session
Group/Presentation Title
Agilent Restricted
Month ##, 200XPage 27
Questions and Answers
My Contact Details :
Email : peter_woon@agilent.com
Telnet : 215-8323
DID : +65 6215 8323
Winning ThroughWinning Through
InnovationInnovation

HIgh Tech Electronics Logistics and Supply Chain Management Forum, Shanghai 2006

  • 1.
    Group/Presentation Title Agilent Restricted Month##, 200XPage 1 High-Tech and Electronics Logistics and Supply Chain Management Conference Peter Woon Director, Global Sourcing Agilent Technologies HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22 March, 2006 “Winning through Innovation”
  • 2.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 2 Presentation Part I : Introduction to Agilent Technologies Part II : SRM in Agilent • Business Needs for a common SRM Model • SRM Components – Stratification – Governance – Performance Measurement – Supplier Development • Benefits of implementing SRM program Q&A Session
  • 3.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 3 Agilent’s Focus Communications Electronics Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis Our goal is to strengthen Agilent’s position as the world’s premier measurement company Agilent provides core electronic and bio- analytical measurement tools to advance the electronics, communications, life sciences, research, environmental, and petrochemical industries Agilent’s Overview
  • 4.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 4 Agilent Around the World • Customers in more than 110 countries • More than 60% of revenue generated outside U.S. • Global manufacturing and R&D Agilent Facts $ 5.1 billion (exclude SPG)Net revenue (FY05) Employees 21,000 employees Headquarters Palo Alto, California
  • 5.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 5 Bio-Analytical Measurement Electronic Measurement Semiconductor Test Solutions $1.42B$3.27B $0.45B Agilent Businesses The world’s premier measurement company Total FY05 GAAP Revenue of $5.1 billion excludes revenues from Agilent’s Semiconductor Products Group. Shared Infrastructure Agilent Laboratories Global Infrastructural Organization Global functional support teams Sourcing, Finance, Information Technology, Human Resources, Workplace Services, Legal, Trade and Tax etc
  • 6.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 6 Agilent FY05 Revenue by End Markets Chemical Analysis Life Sciences Wireless Wireline General purpose test Semiconductor Test This represents GAAP figures and excludes the revenues of Agilent’s Semiconductor Products Group. 12% 34% 6% 23% 9% 16%
  • 7.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 7 Agilent Around the World • Customers in more than 110 countries • More than 60% of revenue generated outside U.S. • Global manufacturing and R&D
  • 8.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 8 FY05 Net Revenue by Geography 38% 39% 23% Total GAAP revenue of $5.1 billion excludes the revenues of Agilent’s Semiconductor Products Group. Americas $1.96B Asia Pacific $1.98B Europe $1.20B 100%=$5.14B
  • 9.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 9 Agilent’s Industry-Leading Customers Astra Zeneca Aventis BASF AG Bayer AG Boehringer Ingelheim Dana-Farber Cancer Institute DuPont Dow Chemical Exxon-Mobil Eli Lilly GlaxoSmithKline Merck National Cancer Institute Nestle Novartis Pfizer U.S. Army, FDA, EPA, NIH Alcatel Cisco Ericsson Flextronics Fujitsu Huawei IBM LG Lockheed Lucent Motorola NEC Nokia NTT Orange Samsung SBC Singtel Sprint Verizon Life Sciences and Chemical AnalysisElectronic Measurement
  • 10.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 10 Presentation Part I : Introduction to Agilent Technologies Part II : SRM in Agilent • Business Needs for a common SRM Model • SRM Components – Stratification – Governance – Performance Measurement – Supplier Development • Benefits of implementing SRM Program Q&A Session
  • 11.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 11 Business need for a common SRM Model • Agilent has realized significant savings and other benefits from outsourcing services previously delivered in-house • Increased reliance on external providers has made effective Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) critical • However, Agilent has lacked a common model and results-oriented approach for optimizing supplier relationship management − Each function had defined its own approaches, tools, and processes for SRM − Agilent had not fully transitioned from people management to SLA management − Roles and responsibilities for SRM had not been clearly defined, reducing effectiveness and proliferating “vendor managers” • As a result, there were clear business need to design and implement a common SRM model to enable leveraging a COMMON process and methodology across the supply base.
  • 12.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 12 Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) provides a framework for managing supplier interactions throughout the entire supplier relationship lifecycle The Agilent Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) Model: Supplier Development Performance Management SRM Governance Supplier Stratification SRM Definition & Best Practices SRM Systems • Supplier Stratification Definition • Supplier Stratification Expectations • Supplier Stratification Execution • Capability and Functionality Needs Analysis • SRM Model Definition • Teams, Roles and Competencies Definition • Ongoing Governance Management • SRM Adoption Management • Performance Management Definition • Performance Management Tool Development • Ongoing Supplier Performance Management • Supplier Development Needs Definition • Supplier Development Program Definition • Ongoing Supplier Development • Systems Selection and Deployment • Best Practices
  • 13.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 13 Components of Supplier Stratification Supplier Stratification Supplier Stratification Definition Supplier Stratification Expectations Supplier Stratification Execution Definition of supplier tiers Characteristics of supplier tiers Expectations by supplier tier Supply Base guidelines Stratification criteria Stratification process Stratification tools
  • 14.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 14 Supplier stratification process One of the key activities in the Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) effort was to stratify suppliers in the areas like HR, WPS, IT and Marketing etc. Supplier Stratification was required to effectively prioritized supplier relationship management focus on strategic and core suppliers The stratification exercise also revealed that approx 30% of the spend $$$ were with the “tail” of ~4,400 basic suppliers across the areas Agilent has an opportunity to realize savings in the short term by rationalizing suppliers in specific target categories where significant savings opportunities exist
  • 15.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 15 IT, WPS, HR, and Marketing, all categories where SRM is underway, each have a long supplier “tail” The “tail”: • Average of 30+% of spend • ~4,400 suppliers (98%) Spend # Suppliers IT WPS HR Marketing 60% 14 800+ 80% 29 55% 16 80% 25 2,300+ 650 800+ Supplier tail in each function represents opportunity for rationalizing suppliers in specific sub-categories where significant savings are possible
  • 16.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 16 Transactional Suppliers Enterprise Partners Strategic Suppliers Core Suppliers Transactional Suppliers Enterprise Partners Strategic Suppliers Core Suppliers Transactional Suppliers Enterprise Partners Strategic Suppliers Core Suppliers Transactional Suppliers Enterprise Partners Strategic Suppliers Core Suppliers Strategic Suppliers Core Suppliers Basic Suppliers Stratification Tiers and Characteristics Strategic Suppliers: Critical to operations of functional group(s) and to long-term functional goals Require significant functional resources and investment Core Suppliers: Important to operations of functional group(s) and to long-term functional goals Potential incremental value from developing ongoing relationship Difficult to replace Basic Suppliers: Short-term, transactional relationships Minimal investment Purely cost-driven performance management Do Not Do Business With Strategic Company-Wide Partners: Qualified as Strategic Supplier Multi-dimensional relationship (multi-function, buy-sell, etc.) Typically require high levels of cross-functional resources and investment Do Not Do Business With: List of suppliers with whom Agilent has elected not to do business 80% Financial Value 20% Financial Value Strategic Company- Wide Partners The first three supplier tiers are determined at the Function level, allowing for flexibility. The highest tier is determined across Functions, providing a company-wide perspective.
  • 17.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 17 Relationship Model
  • 18.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 18 Components of SRM Governance SRM Governance Teams, Roles, and Competencies Definition Ongoing Governance Management SRM Adoption Management SRM Team structure by strata SRM roles and responsibilities SRM competencies definition SRM competency assessment and development process SRM review structure and processes Day-to-day supplier management processes Escalation process Process and tools for measurement of SRM adoption and effectiveness Ongoing process to incorporate feedback
  • 19.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 19 Teams responsible for managing supplier relationships the team objectives Operations Management Team Executive Management Team Assess supplier operational performance Assess financial performance Analyze and address escalation issues Assess supplier operational performance Develop suppliers to resolve capability gaps Discuss new capabilities Partner with program managers and content experts Assess supplier financial performance Manage supplier contracts and service level agreements Manage new supplier services and change order requirements Business Office SRM Lead Lead internal SRM team collaboration and Assist with interactions with suppliers and business partners Ongoing Operational Activities SupplierRelationshipManagement(SRM)Operations
  • 20.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 20 What are the structure and roles of current SRM teams? Operations Management Team Executive Management Team Business Office SRM Lead Ongoing Operational Activities SupplierRelationshipManagement(SRM)Operations Supplier Personnel Agilent Personnel Ops Mgmt. Lead Financial Performance Mgmt. Contract /Sourcing Management Relationship Risk Mgmt. Communications Management Legal & Audit Support Client Relationship Mgmt. Lead Sales Relationship Core Support Delivery Management Project Management Transition Management Performance Management Supplier Development Mgmt. Customer Satisfaction Mgmt. Escalation Management Other Supplier Team Members Other Supplier Leads Agilent Executive Sponsor Other Executive(s) Client Relationship Sponsor SRM Lead
  • 21.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 21 Components of Performance Management Performance Management Definition Performance Management Performance Management Tool Development Ongoing Performance Management Performance Management components and process definition Performance Management team roles and responsibilities Performance Management goals and objectives Performance Management review structure and processes Day-to-day metric tracking and supplier communication Escalation process and management of supplier accountability Supplier objective and KPI alignment with Functional goals and targets SLA visibility and management Performance tracking tools: • Scorecards • Supplier Metrics Registers • Action Items • Supplier Surveys
  • 22.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 22 KPI Deinfition Example Delivery System Owner Average spend per mile in period $0.33 / flight mile in 1Q04 BTI feed Travel SRM Mngr rental $ daily rate over period $74 / day in May 03 Hertz download Travel SRM Mngr Online Booking Tool Operational Savings Net $ savings due to online booking $102,000 saved in 1Q04 Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr Average Cost per Hotel night booked Average cost over all hotel nights book through Travel $123.24 / night Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr BTI Agency Costs $389,000 in 1Q04 BTI feed BTI Average Domestic Ticket Price Average price over period $469 Finance feed BTI Price Average price over period $824 Finance feed BTI Business vs. First class metric Ratio of first class to business tickets issued during period 0.21 in FY02 BTI feed Travel SRM Mngr Average spend per mile by airline Average spend by airline over period $0.31 / flight mile on AirAgilent Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr Function KPI Catalog KPI Deinfition Example Delivery System Owner Average spend per mile in period $0.33 / flight mile in 1Q04 BTI feed Travel SRM Mngr rental $ daily rate over period $74 / day in May 03 Hertz download Travel SRM Mngr Online Booking Tool Operational Savings Net $ savings due to online booking $102,000 saved in 1Q04 Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr Average Cost per Hotel night booked Average cost over all hotel nights book through Travel $123.24 / night Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr BTI Agency Costs $389,000 in 1Q04 BTI feed BTI Average Domestic Ticket Price Average price over period $469 Finance feed BTI Price Average price over period $824 Finance feed BTI Business vs. First class metric Ratio of first class to business tickets issued during period 0.21 in FY02 BTI feed Travel SRM Mngr Average spend per mile by airline Average spend by airline over period $0.31 / flight mile on AirAgilent Finance feed Travel SRM Mngr Function KPI CatalogFunction Supply KPI Catalog Re f # Action Ite m Ow ner Priority D ate Identified D ate D ue St atus N otes / C om m ents Gov-a-0 24 R eview over all co ntr act in dic ato r (yellow v s. red) on B. sco recard an d dashb oard D oug K nigh t / V innie E gizi Low 3-D ec -0 3 15-A pr-0 4 O pen 3/17: A gile nt content with curren t - will re vie w in April Gov-a-0 25 R e-evaluate weights on B . sc oreca rd D oug K nigh t / V innie E gizi Low 3-D ec -0 3 15-A pr-0 4 O pen HP reco m m endatio n provided - need a pproval from D oug . 3 /17: A gilent con tent w ith curren t - will rev iew in A pril Gov-a-0 30 A ss ess if TQ RD C E is be st approa ch to m e asuring c us tom er sa tisfac tion D oug K nigh t M e d 3-D ec -0 3 28-A pr-0 4 C los ed 3/17: A dditional q ue stio ns to be integrate d and pro vid ed to larger a udienc e. Gov-a-0 31 R eview and ag re e on on-g oing c ontent require m ents for G ove rn an ce m ateria ls (e.g., freq uenc y of tower “d eep div es”) D oug K nigh t / V innie E gizi / K im N utter M e d 13-Feb-04 15-A pr-0 4 C los ed new m eeting struc ture es tablis hed s pecific to conten t requirem ents . Gov-a-3 3 P rovid e m ore detailed defin ition o f what c onstitu tes a n IM A C S cott Cobe rn us M e d 17-M ar-04 23-A pr-0 4 Can celle d m erge d with item # gov-a-40 Gov-a-3 4 E valu ate pre-paym ent options an d provide A gile nt feedba ck. Tim K raem er M e d 17-M ar-04 24-M a r-04 C los ed 3/19: C IBC ad jus ted base line s eas onally. 4/2 : not easy - req uires a lot of ac cr ua ls an d deferrals. S o poss ible bu t want to avoid. Tim to fo rm ally com m u nicate to Vinnie/D oug. 4 /16: Tim m ade rec om m end ation to not do this. Gov-a-3 5 A ss ociated entities listin g/E x hibit 7 D ale H oppenrath M e d 3-M ar-04 31-M a r-04 C los ed 4/2: rec eived new ex hibit 7 / new s ite listin g Gov-a-3 6 A gree to process to a ttain brea ch ite m c losur e (i.e., s ig n-off th at co ntractual de liverable req’ts have be en m e t). V inc ent E gizi, D oug K nigh t M e d 24-M ar-04 30-A pr-0 4 O pen 4/16: m eetin g s che duled 4 /28/04. M ichelle pulling data Gov-a-3 7 A ss ess how to m ak e the CLM inventor y pipe line v isible Jo hn M elin M e d 24-M ar-04 30-A pr-0 4 O pen Gov-a-3 8 E xp lo re leve ra ge poin ts from A ltiris V inc ent E gizi M e d 24-M ar-04 29-M ay-0 4 O pen 4/2: onc e ass et m gt is stable HP w ill lo ok at this. Gov-a-3 9 R eprese nt break -fix as p ercentag e that hit on e d ay vs. the avera ge Jo hn M elin, Gre g C offey M e d 24-M ar-04 28-A pr-0 4 C los ed Action Item Registers Execution of Performance Management Align metrics to Function objectives and targets Align metrics to contract SLAs Define KPIs, performance targets and contractual consequences Apply scorecards and dashboards to report KPIs at different levels Use Action Item Register to track and escalate issue resolution Apply other tools to manage overall KPI List and supplier commitments Report supplier performance based on strata frequency requirements Manage ongoing issue identification and resolution Provide performance inputs to Supplier Reviews Resolve performance issues Provide rewards/incentives to suppliers exceeding performance targets Penalize and/or eliminate underperforming suppliers Function Function Supplier Owner Survey rating score Weekly system utilization Percent of system uptime Definition SourceKPI SurveyUser satisfaction Oracle monitorCapacity Utilization System logUptime Supplier Evaluation Scorecard Category Manager <Name>, GS Grade Account Manager <Name>, Supplier Good Completion Date Fair Poor Fill Rate % >=92 94-92 <=94 95.3 97.0 97.0 97.0 96.4 93.0 99.0 99.0 94.7 96.4 Monthly Turnover Rate % <=5 5-10 >=10 8.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Preventable Turnover Rate % <=5 5-10 >=10 7.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Account Management Account Management Quality Rating 1-3 3 2 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Invoice Timeliness Days late <=0 0-5 >=5 2.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Invoice Accuracy % Variance of Total Bill <=0 0-2 >=2 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 Reporting Timeliness Days late <=0 0-5 >=5 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.7 0.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Reporting Accuracy Reporting Errors <=0 0-3 >=3 1.7 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.6 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 On-site Management Quality Score 1-5 >=3.5 2-3.5 <=2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Temporary Associate Quality Score 1-5 >=3.5 2-3.5 <=2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Update Meeting Quality Rating 1-3 3 2 1 Improvement Feedback Quality Rating 1-3 3 2 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 <Name> <Name> <Name> Omaha Q1 Q2 Q3 Annual Average Q2 Q4 <Name>Company Functional Managers Supplier On-Site Managers Representatives Base Evaluation Metrics Survey Results QuarterlyMetrics Reporting and Invoicing Quarterly Reviews Q3 Comments / Action Items Metric Units Good Fair (between range) Poor Annual Average Fort Worth Q1 Definition Meets or exceeds requirements Nearly meets requirements, improvement needed within one month Fails to meet requirements Annual Scorecard By Quarter and Location Evaluation Category MonthlyMetrics Evaluation Criteria Q4 Metrics Tools Ongoing Measurement Outcomes Scorecards & Dashboards Incentives / Rewards Penalties Elimination Incentives / Rewards Penalties Elimination
  • 23.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 23 Components of Supplier Development Supplier Development Needs Definition Supplier Development Supplier Development Program Definition Ongoing Supplier Development Supplier Development goals and objectives Supplier Development benefits Supplier Development challenges and needs Supplier Development Program objectives Supplier Development Program components and process definition Supplier Development Program implementation techniques Supplier Development team roles and responsibilities Supplier Development stratification impact
  • 24.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 24 Supplier Development challenges and needs Development NeedsSupplier Relationship Challenges Continuous Improvement • Corporate/Functional objectives require year-on-year cost and/or service level improvements • Competition drives need to identify and implement best practices • Ineffective processes and systems in relationship drive increased costs and reduce performance Examples Capability Gap Closure • Supplier does not offer the services and/or products that Agilent needs • Supplier does not have the global capabilities to meet Agilent objectives • Supplier has capabilities that require further development to meet Agilent requirements • HR service provider lacked the employee services functionality required • TBD Value Creation • Few contracts encourage suppliers to identify opportunities to add value to Agilent • Lack of process to identify new value creation ideas • Lack of incentives for suppliers to identify new opportunities • Logistics Function sought creative approaches for additional cost savings
  • 25.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 25 Benefits of implementing SRM Increased supplier performance visibility and accountability Aligned Corporate, Functional, and Supplier objectives Streamlined governance activities with a “Single Agilent Face” to suppliers Stratified supply base and greater visibility into supply relationship priorities and criticality Immediate Impacts of SRM Year-on-year cost-reductions and continuous performance improvement Supplier agreements support business performance and extract maximum supplier value Realization of internal efficiencies and reduction in supply management costs Stronger and more strategic supplier relationships with reduced supply costs and risks Long-Term Benefits of SRM
  • 26.
    HTESCM, Shanghai, 21-22March 2006 Agilent Technologies Page 26 Presentation Part I : Introduction to Agilent Technologies Part II : SRM in Agilent • Business Needs for a common SRM Model • SRM Components – Stratification – Governance – Performance Measurement – Supplier Development • Benefits of SRM program Q&A Session
  • 27.
    Group/Presentation Title Agilent Restricted Month##, 200XPage 27 Questions and Answers My Contact Details : Email : peter_woon@agilent.com Telnet : 215-8323 DID : +65 6215 8323 Winning ThroughWinning Through InnovationInnovation