SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Guest commentary « Big Bend Now                                                                                 4/9/12 3:50 PM




 Monday, April 9, 2012                                                     contact advertise archives download newspapers

           SEARCH
          HOME
          NEWS
               Top Stories
               Arts
               Community
               Education
               Features
               Sports
               Multimedia
               Obituaries
               Public Notices
          NOTICIAS EN ESPAÑOL
          BIG BEND BLOG
          WEST TEXAS TALK


 Guest commentary
 by Alberto Halpern | March 28th, 2012 under Big Bend Blog » Big Bend Blog Highlight


 How to restore the pronghorn, and other species
 By CHRISTOPHER GILL

 I am writing with respect to Mark Glover’s excellent article, Can the Pronghorn be Saved?, published March
 8, 2012. It touches on many clues about pronghorn decline and proves again that we usually have all the
 information we need to make a decision, if only we will organize our data and “connect the dots.”

 Your most important statement is that pronghorn numbered in the millions when buffalo numbered in the
 millions. Therein lies the insight needed to address pronghorn decline. Pronghorn as a species are dependant
 on other large grazers. When the bison and other wild animals disappeared, cattle, sheep, goats, horses and
 burros replaced them. But for decades, as reflected in the periods of pronghorn decline you document,
 ranching economics, and the range-and-academic institutional advice have combined to remove livestock.
 Accepted range theory says that “over-grazing” harms plants and wildlife. While it is true that ranching has
 sometimes damaged the Western ranges, the disappearance of large grazers in diverse animal communities
 creates another phenomenon called “over-rest.” This is as deadly as over-grazing: Most range damage has
 come from over-rest, not over-grazing.

 If removal of domestic animals promotes rangeland health, then West Texas should be a blooming oasis. I
 drive between our ranch in Van Horn and El Paso fifty times a year: I have seen perhaps 10 cattle along the

http://bigbendnow.com/2012/03/how-to-restore-the-pronghorn-and-other-species/                                       Page 1 of 4
Guest commentary « Big Bend Now                                                                          4/9/12 3:50 PM



 interstate in 10 years. I challenge anyone to show that country is improving under total rest. Across the
 Southwest, destocked grasslands are “desertifying”: shifting to desert.

 The antidote is simple in concept: We must get animals back on the land, in a way that mimics nature. The
 mixed bison, pronghorn, elk, deer and sheep herds were not confined to fixed areas, all the time. Large herds
 grazed intensively and then disappeared for long periods. There is a range science called “Holistic Planned
 Grazing” which uses domestic animals to do what nomadic herds once did. We use this at Circle Ranch at
 Van Horn. We have tripled our number of pronghorn during the same period in which the West Texas herds
 have declined by 80%. We have lots of bighorn, elk, deer and at times 1,000 cattle on 32,000 acres. We kill
 no predators. This grazing must occur within an attentive management and planning process to be
 successful.

 Of course drought is always a factor. But the long-term decline in range conditions across the West has
 continued through several wet and dry cycles. I am hearing now about climate change being the culprit, even
 though the climate has not changed (yet). All of our droughts are more intense because the rainfall has
 become inefficient as a result of the disappearance of plant cover and its replacement by bare ground between
 dwindling grass plants. Most far-West Texas rain runs off or evaporates immediately.

 It is also true that pronghorn are susceptible to predation. But pronghorn lived with bigger, faster, meaner and
 more-numerous predators for millions of years. Range decline and increased bare ground by definition means
 less cover in which pronghorn fawns can hide from predators. With respect to helping pronghorn by killing
 predators remember this: The history of wildlife management proves predator eradication always backfires
 and harms the animals we wish to “protect.” Nature has worked this out better than any wildlife “manager.”

 It is also true that sheep net fences are a problem for pronghorn. At Circle Ranch we continue to remove as
 many of these as we can afford in any year. But sheep and goat ranching, the reason for those fences,
 disappeared 35 years ago. So during this same period of pronghorn decline, those fences have been falling
 down through neglect, and no new ones have been built. Disappearances of sheep and goats have harmed
 pronghorn more than these old, falling-down fences.

 With respect to worms, these are symptoms, not root causes: Starving animals are much more susceptible to
 parasites and disease than healthy ones. And the harm to plants and soil life from over-rest is probably
 contributing in ways we do not understand: Perhaps some now-missing plant, or organism, used to suppress
 worms.

 Habitat fragmentation is another questionable explanation: We have huge areas of unfragmentated habitat
 across Texas from which pronghorn have completely disappeared. Examples would be the WMA’s, Parks,
 the international bio-sphere reserves, and many vast ranches. We should foster cooperative agreements
 between landowners and yet, as far as I can tell, there is none of that being promoted in far-West Texas by
 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.

 With respect to the recent transplant of 200 pronghorn, the facts are worse than you report: Over 80% of
 these animals were dead within a few months; most survivors are probably dead now. This is no reflection
 on the good people who tried hard and failed with this transfer. The habitat to which pronghorn are being
 moved can no longer support pronghorn, which is why they disappeared in the first place!

 Habitat decline is the root cause, not overhunting, coyotes, cattle, fences, worms or climate change.
 Pronghorn decline is a symptom of rangeland decline.

http://bigbendnow.com/2012/03/how-to-restore-the-pronghorn-and-other-species/                                Page 2 of 4
Guest commentary « Big Bend Now                                                                       4/9/12 3:50 PM



 Unless we change our basic range practices, why expect different outcomes? For seventy years the range and
 academic bureaucracies have had their chance to prove that destocking the ranges works: The outcomes for
 many species including quail, pronghorn, mule deer and others speak for themselves. This range science
 holds that “over-grazing” is responsible for all aspects of range decline including brush incursion; in fact,
 over-rest is doing most of the damage.

 The idea that ranges must be protected from large numbers of animals also leads to the eradication programs
 which are so damaging to all wildlife and habitat. Texas examples include current burro eradications at Big
 Bend Ranch State Park, and of native elk, bison, large predators, all “exotics” like aoudad, other wild animals
 and all domestic animals on public lands managed by TPWD. Elsewhere, oryx are being eradicated in New
 Mexico and wild horses across the West. Ranchers are being whittled off the land by BLM stocking rate
 reductions: This will lead to the eventual destruction of our precious Western ranching culture.

 The removals reflect the agencies’ core assumption that animals harm land. As land degrades the medicine
 (removals) is administered in ever-larger doses, proving the adage, “When your only tool is a hammer, every
 problem looks like a nail.” In my world, failure forces change. Not so in government and academia, which
 routinely “double-down” on practices proven to have disastrous consequences. It is not just a Washington
 phenomenon: It is happening right here on the rangelands of far-West Texas.

 We should be restoring bio-diversity using the animals available, and protecting what is left of the wild
 animal community. To quote Aldo Leopold, “The first precaution of intelligent wildlife tinkering is to
 preserve every cog and wheel.” Thousands of practitioners of planned grazing across the world are proving
 on millions of acres that domestic animals and wildlife, when grazed together under attentive management
 and planning offer the best and only sustainable method of restoring ranges to a condition wherein they can
 support many wild species including pronghorn.

 I offer two constructive steps to deal with this dilemma, one local, another national: This coming July 13 &
 14, Holistic Management International (HMI) of Albuquerque, NM, in cooperation with the San Antonio and
 West Texas Chapter of Quail Forever, and WEST, a coalition of West Texas wildlife enthusiasts, will present
 a two-day class, Cows and Quail, in which we will demonstrate and teach how to use cattle and wildlife to
 restore plants and habitat for both. This two-day class will be based at Van Horn and conducted at Circle
 Ranch. Tuition will be $250. Attendees will leave the class with a grazing plan for their ranch that will show
 them how to address and reverse habitat decline in an affordable, effective, and sustainable manner using the
 tools of animal impact from wildlife and cattle, which pay for themselves. Information on this can be
 received by calling Peggy Cole at 505-842-5252. I urge every person who wants to actually get something
 done on pronghorn and other wildlife decline to attend this class.

 At a national level, we must call for a Congressional Inquiry into the range practices used across Texas and
 the West. There is only one range science being taught and used; it originated in the land grant universities.
 Texas, Montana, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, North and South Dakota, Colorado, Nevada,
 California, Oklahoma, etc. use it as do the BLM, Forest Service, NRCS, BIA, TPWD, etc.: i.e. everyone,
 everywhere. At this hearing the authorities should not be allowed to control the evidence and testimony given
 on these practices. The bureaucracies sincerely consider themselves the Voice of Authority, and dismiss those
 of us who challenge them as uninformed and emotional. There can be nothing more important for ourselves
 and our communities than such a fundamental review.

 For more information visit www.circleranchtx.com.


http://bigbendnow.com/2012/03/how-to-restore-the-pronghorn-and-other-species/                             Page 3 of 4
Guest commentary « Big Bend Now                                                  4/9/12 3:50 PM



 •••••

 Christopher Gill is the owner of the Circle Ranch in Sierra Diablo Mountains.

 Tags: Chrisopher Gill, Guest Commentary, pronhorn
    Share |

 Story filed under: Big Bend Blog

 Leave a Reply
 You must be logged in to post a comment.




 about advertise archives contact download newspapers home subscribe




http://bigbendnow.com/2012/03/how-to-restore-the-pronghorn-and-other-species/        Page 4 of 4

More Related Content

What's hot

Fires & wolves yellowstone
Fires & wolves yellowstoneFires & wolves yellowstone
Fires & wolves yellowstoneMark McGinley
 
SWOT Report Vol. X Article
SWOT Report Vol. X ArticleSWOT Report Vol. X Article
SWOT Report Vol. X ArticleMaggie Roberts
 
Cheetah (genetic diversity)
Cheetah (genetic diversity)Cheetah (genetic diversity)
Cheetah (genetic diversity)Julius Manolong
 
Vegan Starter Guide
Vegan Starter GuideVegan Starter Guide
Vegan Starter Guidev2zq
 
Evolution, Biodiversity, and Population ecology
Evolution, Biodiversity, and Population ecologyEvolution, Biodiversity, and Population ecology
Evolution, Biodiversity, and Population ecologyKiersten Lippmann
 
The deviation in hardy weinberg equilibrium
The deviation in hardy weinberg equilibriumThe deviation in hardy weinberg equilibrium
The deviation in hardy weinberg equilibriumHasan Kouta
 
Conservation Management: Yellowstone Wolf Restoration Program & Chinese Analogy
Conservation Management: Yellowstone Wolf Restoration Program & Chinese AnalogyConservation Management: Yellowstone Wolf Restoration Program & Chinese Analogy
Conservation Management: Yellowstone Wolf Restoration Program & Chinese AnalogyXueshengnan Gao
 
r and k selection
r and k selection r and k selection
r and k selection JAFFER13
 
Population ecology ch 53
Population ecology ch 53Population ecology ch 53
Population ecology ch 53MrJewett
 
Measurment of biodiversity surendra patel
Measurment of biodiversity surendra patelMeasurment of biodiversity surendra patel
Measurment of biodiversity surendra patelSurendraPatel34
 
Population biology
Population biologyPopulation biology
Population biologyAaron Brice
 
Population ecology 2014
Population ecology 2014Population ecology 2014
Population ecology 2014martyynyyte
 

What's hot (20)

Diet Of Disaster Report
Diet Of Disaster ReportDiet Of Disaster Report
Diet Of Disaster Report
 
Biology 205 11
Biology 205 11Biology 205 11
Biology 205 11
 
Fires & wolves yellowstone
Fires & wolves yellowstoneFires & wolves yellowstone
Fires & wolves yellowstone
 
Biology 205 12
Biology 205 12Biology 205 12
Biology 205 12
 
SWOT Report Vol. X Article
SWOT Report Vol. X ArticleSWOT Report Vol. X Article
SWOT Report Vol. X Article
 
Cheetah (genetic diversity)
Cheetah (genetic diversity)Cheetah (genetic diversity)
Cheetah (genetic diversity)
 
Stanford Brochure
Stanford BrochureStanford Brochure
Stanford Brochure
 
Biology 205 8
Biology 205 8Biology 205 8
Biology 205 8
 
Vegan Starter Guide
Vegan Starter GuideVegan Starter Guide
Vegan Starter Guide
 
Evolution, Biodiversity, and Population ecology
Evolution, Biodiversity, and Population ecologyEvolution, Biodiversity, and Population ecology
Evolution, Biodiversity, and Population ecology
 
The deviation in hardy weinberg equilibrium
The deviation in hardy weinberg equilibriumThe deviation in hardy weinberg equilibrium
The deviation in hardy weinberg equilibrium
 
Conservation Management: Yellowstone Wolf Restoration Program & Chinese Analogy
Conservation Management: Yellowstone Wolf Restoration Program & Chinese AnalogyConservation Management: Yellowstone Wolf Restoration Program & Chinese Analogy
Conservation Management: Yellowstone Wolf Restoration Program & Chinese Analogy
 
Populations Biology 2014
Populations Biology 2014Populations Biology 2014
Populations Biology 2014
 
r and k selection
r and k selection r and k selection
r and k selection
 
Population ecology ch 53
Population ecology ch 53Population ecology ch 53
Population ecology ch 53
 
The Land Ethic (part 1)
The Land Ethic (part 1)The Land Ethic (part 1)
The Land Ethic (part 1)
 
Genetic drift & hardy weinberg equilibrium
Genetic drift & hardy weinberg equilibriumGenetic drift & hardy weinberg equilibrium
Genetic drift & hardy weinberg equilibrium
 
Measurment of biodiversity surendra patel
Measurment of biodiversity surendra patelMeasurment of biodiversity surendra patel
Measurment of biodiversity surendra patel
 
Population biology
Population biologyPopulation biology
Population biology
 
Population ecology 2014
Population ecology 2014Population ecology 2014
Population ecology 2014
 

Viewers also liked

South West Habitat Guidelines
South West Habitat GuidelinesSouth West Habitat Guidelines
South West Habitat GuidelinesPitchstone Waters
 
אסופת מאמרים קורס כתיבה של אורי רדלר
אסופת מאמרים   קורס כתיבה של אורי רדלראסופת מאמרים   קורס כתיבה של אורי רדלר
אסופת מאמרים קורס כתיבה של אורי רדלרAnochi.com.
 
How to make a tornado in a bottle sarthak
How to make a tornado in a bottle sarthakHow to make a tornado in a bottle sarthak
How to make a tornado in a bottle sarthakgrade4biss
 
Diapo peri 1
Diapo peri 1Diapo peri 1
Diapo peri 1GLFL
 
Kool kui sümbiootiline arengukeskkond - ideaal ja tegelikkus
 Kool kui sümbiootiline arengukeskkond - ideaal ja tegelikkus Kool kui sümbiootiline arengukeskkond - ideaal ja tegelikkus
Kool kui sümbiootiline arengukeskkond - ideaal ja tegelikkusEne-Silvia Sarv
 
Математика і література
Математика і літератураМатематика і література
Математика і літератураKate Storochenko
 

Viewers also liked (19)

South West Habitat Guidelines
South West Habitat GuidelinesSouth West Habitat Guidelines
South West Habitat Guidelines
 
9361447 feb 4-2010
9361447 feb 4-20109361447 feb 4-2010
9361447 feb 4-2010
 
8109779 cr
8109779 cr8109779 cr
8109779 cr
 
9317287 aa91
9317287 aa919317287 aa91
9317287 aa91
 
Chris Gill to Carter Smith
Chris Gill to Carter SmithChris Gill to Carter Smith
Chris Gill to Carter Smith
 
Are Elk Native to Texas?
Are Elk Native to Texas?Are Elk Native to Texas?
Are Elk Native to Texas?
 
Gbi2
Gbi2Gbi2
Gbi2
 
Estra 00
Estra 00Estra 00
Estra 00
 
Derechos de autor
Derechos de autorDerechos de autor
Derechos de autor
 
Prisoners
PrisonersPrisoners
Prisoners
 
Water tornado
Water tornadoWater tornado
Water tornado
 
אסופת מאמרים קורס כתיבה של אורי רדלר
אסופת מאמרים   קורס כתיבה של אורי רדלראסופת מאמרים   קורס כתיבה של אורי רדלר
אסופת מאמרים קורס כתיבה של אורי רדלר
 
How to make a tornado in a bottle sarthak
How to make a tornado in a bottle sarthakHow to make a tornado in a bottle sarthak
How to make a tornado in a bottle sarthak
 
Bt xnk
Bt xnkBt xnk
Bt xnk
 
La oferta
La ofertaLa oferta
La oferta
 
Diapo peri 1
Diapo peri 1Diapo peri 1
Diapo peri 1
 
Kool kui sümbiootiline arengukeskkond - ideaal ja tegelikkus
 Kool kui sümbiootiline arengukeskkond - ideaal ja tegelikkus Kool kui sümbiootiline arengukeskkond - ideaal ja tegelikkus
Kool kui sümbiootiline arengukeskkond - ideaal ja tegelikkus
 
Artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligenceArtificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence
 
Математика і література
Математика і літератураМатематика і література
Математика і література
 

More from Pitchstone Waters

8987491 pronghorn research-report_2012_final_lah
8987491 pronghorn research-report_2012_final_lah8987491 pronghorn research-report_2012_final_lah
8987491 pronghorn research-report_2012_final_lahPitchstone Waters
 
Christopher Gill to Editor of Big Bend Sentinel on Elk Removals
Christopher Gill to Editor of Big Bend Sentinel on Elk RemovalsChristopher Gill to Editor of Big Bend Sentinel on Elk Removals
Christopher Gill to Editor of Big Bend Sentinel on Elk RemovalsPitchstone Waters
 
Sierra Diablo Cave - Archeology Update
Sierra Diablo Cave - Archeology UpdateSierra Diablo Cave - Archeology Update
Sierra Diablo Cave - Archeology UpdatePitchstone Waters
 
Cows and Quail Program - 2012
Cows and Quail Program - 2012Cows and Quail Program - 2012
Cows and Quail Program - 2012Pitchstone Waters
 
Report on Mule Deer Research in the Chihuahuan Desert
Report on Mule Deer Research in the Chihuahuan Desert Report on Mule Deer Research in the Chihuahuan Desert
Report on Mule Deer Research in the Chihuahuan Desert Pitchstone Waters
 

More from Pitchstone Waters (6)

8987491 pronghorn research-report_2012_final_lah
8987491 pronghorn research-report_2012_final_lah8987491 pronghorn research-report_2012_final_lah
8987491 pronghorn research-report_2012_final_lah
 
Christopher Gill to Editor of Big Bend Sentinel on Elk Removals
Christopher Gill to Editor of Big Bend Sentinel on Elk RemovalsChristopher Gill to Editor of Big Bend Sentinel on Elk Removals
Christopher Gill to Editor of Big Bend Sentinel on Elk Removals
 
Sierra Diablo Cave - Archeology Update
Sierra Diablo Cave - Archeology UpdateSierra Diablo Cave - Archeology Update
Sierra Diablo Cave - Archeology Update
 
Quail Habitat
Quail HabitatQuail Habitat
Quail Habitat
 
Cows and Quail Program - 2012
Cows and Quail Program - 2012Cows and Quail Program - 2012
Cows and Quail Program - 2012
 
Report on Mule Deer Research in the Chihuahuan Desert
Report on Mule Deer Research in the Chihuahuan Desert Report on Mule Deer Research in the Chihuahuan Desert
Report on Mule Deer Research in the Chihuahuan Desert
 

How to Restore Pronghorn

  • 1. Guest commentary « Big Bend Now 4/9/12 3:50 PM Monday, April 9, 2012 contact advertise archives download newspapers SEARCH HOME NEWS Top Stories Arts Community Education Features Sports Multimedia Obituaries Public Notices NOTICIAS EN ESPAÑOL BIG BEND BLOG WEST TEXAS TALK Guest commentary by Alberto Halpern | March 28th, 2012 under Big Bend Blog » Big Bend Blog Highlight How to restore the pronghorn, and other species By CHRISTOPHER GILL I am writing with respect to Mark Glover’s excellent article, Can the Pronghorn be Saved?, published March 8, 2012. It touches on many clues about pronghorn decline and proves again that we usually have all the information we need to make a decision, if only we will organize our data and “connect the dots.” Your most important statement is that pronghorn numbered in the millions when buffalo numbered in the millions. Therein lies the insight needed to address pronghorn decline. Pronghorn as a species are dependant on other large grazers. When the bison and other wild animals disappeared, cattle, sheep, goats, horses and burros replaced them. But for decades, as reflected in the periods of pronghorn decline you document, ranching economics, and the range-and-academic institutional advice have combined to remove livestock. Accepted range theory says that “over-grazing” harms plants and wildlife. While it is true that ranching has sometimes damaged the Western ranges, the disappearance of large grazers in diverse animal communities creates another phenomenon called “over-rest.” This is as deadly as over-grazing: Most range damage has come from over-rest, not over-grazing. If removal of domestic animals promotes rangeland health, then West Texas should be a blooming oasis. I drive between our ranch in Van Horn and El Paso fifty times a year: I have seen perhaps 10 cattle along the http://bigbendnow.com/2012/03/how-to-restore-the-pronghorn-and-other-species/ Page 1 of 4
  • 2. Guest commentary « Big Bend Now 4/9/12 3:50 PM interstate in 10 years. I challenge anyone to show that country is improving under total rest. Across the Southwest, destocked grasslands are “desertifying”: shifting to desert. The antidote is simple in concept: We must get animals back on the land, in a way that mimics nature. The mixed bison, pronghorn, elk, deer and sheep herds were not confined to fixed areas, all the time. Large herds grazed intensively and then disappeared for long periods. There is a range science called “Holistic Planned Grazing” which uses domestic animals to do what nomadic herds once did. We use this at Circle Ranch at Van Horn. We have tripled our number of pronghorn during the same period in which the West Texas herds have declined by 80%. We have lots of bighorn, elk, deer and at times 1,000 cattle on 32,000 acres. We kill no predators. This grazing must occur within an attentive management and planning process to be successful. Of course drought is always a factor. But the long-term decline in range conditions across the West has continued through several wet and dry cycles. I am hearing now about climate change being the culprit, even though the climate has not changed (yet). All of our droughts are more intense because the rainfall has become inefficient as a result of the disappearance of plant cover and its replacement by bare ground between dwindling grass plants. Most far-West Texas rain runs off or evaporates immediately. It is also true that pronghorn are susceptible to predation. But pronghorn lived with bigger, faster, meaner and more-numerous predators for millions of years. Range decline and increased bare ground by definition means less cover in which pronghorn fawns can hide from predators. With respect to helping pronghorn by killing predators remember this: The history of wildlife management proves predator eradication always backfires and harms the animals we wish to “protect.” Nature has worked this out better than any wildlife “manager.” It is also true that sheep net fences are a problem for pronghorn. At Circle Ranch we continue to remove as many of these as we can afford in any year. But sheep and goat ranching, the reason for those fences, disappeared 35 years ago. So during this same period of pronghorn decline, those fences have been falling down through neglect, and no new ones have been built. Disappearances of sheep and goats have harmed pronghorn more than these old, falling-down fences. With respect to worms, these are symptoms, not root causes: Starving animals are much more susceptible to parasites and disease than healthy ones. And the harm to plants and soil life from over-rest is probably contributing in ways we do not understand: Perhaps some now-missing plant, or organism, used to suppress worms. Habitat fragmentation is another questionable explanation: We have huge areas of unfragmentated habitat across Texas from which pronghorn have completely disappeared. Examples would be the WMA’s, Parks, the international bio-sphere reserves, and many vast ranches. We should foster cooperative agreements between landowners and yet, as far as I can tell, there is none of that being promoted in far-West Texas by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. With respect to the recent transplant of 200 pronghorn, the facts are worse than you report: Over 80% of these animals were dead within a few months; most survivors are probably dead now. This is no reflection on the good people who tried hard and failed with this transfer. The habitat to which pronghorn are being moved can no longer support pronghorn, which is why they disappeared in the first place! Habitat decline is the root cause, not overhunting, coyotes, cattle, fences, worms or climate change. Pronghorn decline is a symptom of rangeland decline. http://bigbendnow.com/2012/03/how-to-restore-the-pronghorn-and-other-species/ Page 2 of 4
  • 3. Guest commentary « Big Bend Now 4/9/12 3:50 PM Unless we change our basic range practices, why expect different outcomes? For seventy years the range and academic bureaucracies have had their chance to prove that destocking the ranges works: The outcomes for many species including quail, pronghorn, mule deer and others speak for themselves. This range science holds that “over-grazing” is responsible for all aspects of range decline including brush incursion; in fact, over-rest is doing most of the damage. The idea that ranges must be protected from large numbers of animals also leads to the eradication programs which are so damaging to all wildlife and habitat. Texas examples include current burro eradications at Big Bend Ranch State Park, and of native elk, bison, large predators, all “exotics” like aoudad, other wild animals and all domestic animals on public lands managed by TPWD. Elsewhere, oryx are being eradicated in New Mexico and wild horses across the West. Ranchers are being whittled off the land by BLM stocking rate reductions: This will lead to the eventual destruction of our precious Western ranching culture. The removals reflect the agencies’ core assumption that animals harm land. As land degrades the medicine (removals) is administered in ever-larger doses, proving the adage, “When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.” In my world, failure forces change. Not so in government and academia, which routinely “double-down” on practices proven to have disastrous consequences. It is not just a Washington phenomenon: It is happening right here on the rangelands of far-West Texas. We should be restoring bio-diversity using the animals available, and protecting what is left of the wild animal community. To quote Aldo Leopold, “The first precaution of intelligent wildlife tinkering is to preserve every cog and wheel.” Thousands of practitioners of planned grazing across the world are proving on millions of acres that domestic animals and wildlife, when grazed together under attentive management and planning offer the best and only sustainable method of restoring ranges to a condition wherein they can support many wild species including pronghorn. I offer two constructive steps to deal with this dilemma, one local, another national: This coming July 13 & 14, Holistic Management International (HMI) of Albuquerque, NM, in cooperation with the San Antonio and West Texas Chapter of Quail Forever, and WEST, a coalition of West Texas wildlife enthusiasts, will present a two-day class, Cows and Quail, in which we will demonstrate and teach how to use cattle and wildlife to restore plants and habitat for both. This two-day class will be based at Van Horn and conducted at Circle Ranch. Tuition will be $250. Attendees will leave the class with a grazing plan for their ranch that will show them how to address and reverse habitat decline in an affordable, effective, and sustainable manner using the tools of animal impact from wildlife and cattle, which pay for themselves. Information on this can be received by calling Peggy Cole at 505-842-5252. I urge every person who wants to actually get something done on pronghorn and other wildlife decline to attend this class. At a national level, we must call for a Congressional Inquiry into the range practices used across Texas and the West. There is only one range science being taught and used; it originated in the land grant universities. Texas, Montana, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, North and South Dakota, Colorado, Nevada, California, Oklahoma, etc. use it as do the BLM, Forest Service, NRCS, BIA, TPWD, etc.: i.e. everyone, everywhere. At this hearing the authorities should not be allowed to control the evidence and testimony given on these practices. The bureaucracies sincerely consider themselves the Voice of Authority, and dismiss those of us who challenge them as uninformed and emotional. There can be nothing more important for ourselves and our communities than such a fundamental review. For more information visit www.circleranchtx.com. http://bigbendnow.com/2012/03/how-to-restore-the-pronghorn-and-other-species/ Page 3 of 4
  • 4. Guest commentary « Big Bend Now 4/9/12 3:50 PM ••••• Christopher Gill is the owner of the Circle Ranch in Sierra Diablo Mountains. Tags: Chrisopher Gill, Guest Commentary, pronhorn Share | Story filed under: Big Bend Blog Leave a Reply You must be logged in to post a comment. about advertise archives contact download newspapers home subscribe http://bigbendnow.com/2012/03/how-to-restore-the-pronghorn-and-other-species/ Page 4 of 4