HOTS QAME RESULTS DAY 1 TO DAY 3 AND EVALUATION

RESULTS OF QAME
FOR DAY 3
DTOT ON HIGHER ORDER THINKING
SKILLS-PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
PACKAGES (HOTS-PLPs)

DAY 3 RESPONDENTS DATA
CLASS
NUMBER OF
PARTICIPANTS
EXPECTED
NUMBER OF
RESPONSES
ACTUAL
NUMBER OF
RESPONSES
PERCENTAGE OF
PARTICIPATION
ENGLISH CLASS A
49 147 147 100%
ENGLISH CLASS B
49 147 147 100%
SCIENCE CLASS A
49 147 147 100%
SCIENCE CLASS B
49 147 147 100%
TOTAL
190 588 588 100%

PROGRAM MAGAMENET AND LEARNING
MANAGEMENT TEAM ATTENDANCE
DAY PMT LMT
EXPECTED
NO. OF
ATTENDEES
ACTUAL
ATTENDEES
PERCENTAGE
OF
ATTENDANCE
DAY 1 8 14 22 18 81.82%
DAY 2 8 14 22 19 86.36%
DAY 3
8 14 22 20 90.90%

NUMERICAL AND
DESCRIPTIVE RATINGS
NUMERICAL RATING DESCRIPTIVE RATING
0-1.49 FAIR
1.50-2.49 GOOD
2.50-3.49 BEST
3.50-4.0 EXCELLENT

QUANTITATIVE DATA
ON QAME END-OF-
SESSION RESULTS
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
PART I
TRAINING VENUE
PART II
ACCOMMODATION
PART III
PROGRAM PROPER
PART IV
SESSION & RP
EVALUATION
PART V

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
EVALUATION
INDICATORS
• The program started on time.
• The session objectives were explained at the beginning of the
session.
• The information and instruction given before the event is clear and
easy to follow.
• The organization of the program is logical.
• The time allotted for the session was sufficient to absorb inputs.
• Adequate session breaks (mid-morning, lunch and mid-afternoon)
• Program was structured properly.
• Socially-inclusive, gender-sensitive, non-discriminatory and non-

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
EVALUATION
INDICATORS
• Program was managed efficiently.
• Emerging welfare needs were immediately addressed.
• Responsive to the need of participants.
• The organization of the opening program flow was logical (national
anthem, ecumenical prayer, DepEd Quality Policy Statement,
welcome remarks, and Introduction of Participants).
• Management of learning (leveling of expectations, agreeing on
session norms, discussion of program objectives and matrix).
• The purpose of the program was clear.
• The session ended on time.

GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF THE
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
EVALUATION RESULTS

CLASS: ENGLISH CLASS A & B / SCIENCE CLASS A &
B
NO. OF RESPONSES:190
(100%)
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT EVALUATION
The
progra
m
started
on
time.
.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
inform
ation
and
instruct
ion
given
before
the
event
is clear
and
easy to
follow.
The
organizati
on of the
program
is logical.
The time
allotted
for the
session
was
sufficient
to absorb
inputs.
Adequat
e
session
breaks
(mid-
morning,
lunch
and mid-
afternoo
n)
Progra
m was
structur
ed
properl
y.
Socially
-
inclusiv
e,
gender-
sensitiv
e, non-
discrimi
natory
and
non-
stereoty
pical
languag
e was
always
used.
Program
was
managed
efficiently.
Emergi
ng
welfare
needs
were
immedi
ately
address
ed.
Respon
sive to
the
need of
particip
ants.
The
organizat
ion of the
opening
program
flow was
logical
Managem
ent of
learning
(leveling of
expectatio
ns,
agreeing
on session
norms,
discussion
of program
objectives
and
matrix).
.
The
purpose
of the
program
was
clear.
The
sessio
n
ended
on
time.
AVERAGE
3.94 3.98 3.98 3.97 3.97 3.96 3.97 3.97 3.98 3.98 3.98 3.98 3.97 3.98 3.95 3.97
Excellen
t
Excelle
nt
Excelle
nt
Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
EXCELLE
NT
Source: Online QAME Tool

COMPARISON OF QAME RESULTS OF
DAY 1, 2 and DAY 3 ON PROGRAM
MANAGEMENT EVALUATION
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3
3.94 3.95 3.97
EXCELLENT EXCELLENT EXCELLENT

TRAINING VENUE
EVALUATION
INDICATORS
• Well-lighted.
• Well-ventilated.
• Sufficient space for program activities.
• Adequate soundproofing.
• Serviceability of equipment (Sound System and Microphone)
• Strong and reliable Internet Connection
• Clean.
• Accessible comfort rooms.
• Meals were of satisfactory quality.
• Meals were nutritious.
• Meals were varied.

TRAINING VENUE EVALUATION
RESULTS

B
(100%)
TRAINING VENUE EVALUATION
Well-
lighted.
.
Well-
ventilated.
Sufficient
space for
program
activities.
Adequate
soundproofi
ng.
Serviceabilit
y of
equipment
(Sound
System and
Microphone
)
Strong
and
reliable
Internet
Connectio
n
Clean.
Accessible
comfort
rooms.
Meals were
of
satisfactory
quality.
Meals
were
nutritious
.
Meals
were
varied.
AVERAGE
3.97 3.95 3.88 3.85 3.89 3.91 3.93 3.92 3.90 3.92 3.97 3.91
Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent EXCELLENT

DAY 1, 2 and DAY 3 ON TRAINING
VENUE EVALUATION
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3
3.83 3.87 3.91

ACCOMMODATION
EVALUATION
INDICATORS
• With sufficient space.
• Comfortable.
• Clean accommodation.
• Facilities are in good working order.
• Toiletries are provided.

ACCOMMODATION EVALUATION
RESULTS

B
(100%)
With sufficient
space.
Comfortable.
Clean
accommodatio
n.
Facilities are in
good working order.
Toiletries are
provided. AVERAGE
3.80 3.88 3.88 3.85 3.75 3.83
Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent EXCELLENT

DAY 1,2 and DAY 3 ON
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3
3.74 3.74 3.83

PROGRAM PROPER
EVALUATION
INDICATORS
• The Opening Program started on time.
• The organization of the opening program flow
was logical
• Management of learning was adequately
handled
• The purpose of the opening program was clear.
• The Opening Program ended on time.

PROGRAM PROPER EVALUATION
RESULTS

B
(100%)
PROGRAM PROPER EVALUATION
The Opening
Program
started on
time.
The
organization
of the
opening
program flow
was logical
Management
of learning
was
adequately
handled
The purpose of
the opening
program was
clear.
The Opening
Program
ended on time.
AVERAGE
3.97 3.97 3.98 3.98 3.95 3.97

DAY 1,2 and DAY 3 ON PROGRAM
PROPER EVALUATION
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3
3.93 3.96 3.97

PART V
SESSION AND RESOURCE
PERSON EVALUATION

SESSION EVALUATION
INDICATORS
• The session started on time.
• The session objectives were explained at the beginning of the session.
• The resource speaker/subject-matter expert demonstrated expertise of the
topic.
• The resource speaker/subject-matter expert explained the topics in an
understandable level.
• The resource speaker/subject-matter expert accommodated my concerns and
questions.
• The time and pace allotted for each session was sufficient to absorb inputs or
to accomplish outputs.
• The resource speaker/subject-matter expert establishes rapport with
participants.

SESSION EVALUATION
INDICATORS
• The resource speaker/subject-matter expert established and maintained a
positive/non-threatening and comfortable learning environment.
• The resource speaker/subject-matter expert demonstrated good communication
skills (verbal and non-verbal).
• The resource speaker/subject-matter expert used appropriate technology with
ease and confidence.
• The resource speaker/subject-matter expert synthesized the responses of the
participants and the activities of the session.
• The resource speaker/subject-matter expert exhibited flexibility and adaptability
in the delivery of the session to ensure an appropriate response to unforeseen
situations.
• The resource speaker/ subject-matter expert presented him/herself in a
professional manner.
• The session ended on time.

SESSION AND RESOURCE PERSON
EVALUATION RESULTS

CLASS: ENGLISH CLASS A
NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
SESSION & RESOURCE PERSON EVALUATION
CLASS MANAGERS:MR. ROMEO T. CABUELLO
JR.
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.96 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.98 3.98 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.89 3.99
Excellent
Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent EXCELLENT
RESOURCE PERSON: DR. RUSTUM GEONZON

NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
JR.
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.96 4.00 3.98 4.00 4.00 3.98 3.98 3.98 3.98 4.00 3.98 4.00 4.00 3.98 3.93 3.98
Excellent
Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
RESOURCE PERSON: MS. AGNES GACELOS

NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
JR.
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.93 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.98 3.95 4.00 4.00 3.98 4.00 4.00 3.98 3.98 3.98 3.89 3.98
Excellent
Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
RESOURCE PERSON: MS. MA. JASMIN CHEN

CLASS: ENGLISH CLASS B
NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
CLASS MANAGERS:MR. ONRIQUE ROLUNA
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.98 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.98 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.85 3.99
Excellent
Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
RESOURCE PERSON: DR. RUSTUM GEONZON

NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.98 3.98 3.96 3.98 3.98 3.98 3.98 3.98 3.96 3.98 3.96 3.96 3.98 3.98 3.96 3.97
Excellent
Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
RESOURCE PERSON: MS. ANITESS JOANNA
DACUT

NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.95 3.90 3.71 3.78 3.88 3.85 3.90 3.88 3.85 3.66 3.73 3.88 3.85 3.88 3.90 3.84
Excellent
Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
RESOURCE PERSON: MS. WILMA MONTEJO

CLASS: SCIENCE CLASS A
NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
CLASS MANAGER: MS. EDRIELYN C. CAMPILLA
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.95 3.97 3.98 3.98 3.98 3.97 3.97 3.98 3.95 3.93 3.98 3.95 3.97 3.98 3.97 3.97
Excellent
Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent
EXCELLE
NT
SESSION 3
RESOURCE PERSON: MS. ROCHELLE
CABADSAN

NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.95 4.00 3.90 3.95 4.00 3.95 3.95 4.00 3.95 3.90 4.00 4.00 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.96
Excellent
Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
EXCELLE
NT
SESSION 3
RESOURCE PERSON: DR. RELDIN CAJES

NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.96 4.00 3.93 3.93 4.00 3.96 3.93 3.96 3.93 4.00 3.93 4.00 3.93 4.00 3.96 3.96
Excellent
Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
EXCELLE
NT
SESSION 3
RESOURCE PERSON: DR. RELDIN CAJES

CLASS: SCIENCE CLASS B
NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
CLASS MANAGER: MR. RICHARD N. GULA
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.95 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.98 4.00 4.00 3.95 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.98 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.99
Excellen
t
Excelle
nt
Excelle
nt
Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
EXCELLE
NT
SESSION 3
RESOURCE PERSON: DR. KAREN DOROJA

NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explain
ed at
the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.93 4.00 4.00 3.98 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.98 3.98 4.00 3.98 4.00 3.98 3.99
Excellen
t
Excelle
nt
Excelle
nt
Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
EXCELLE
NT
SESSION 3
RESOURCE PERSON: DR. KAREN DOROJA

NO. OF RESPONSES:49
(100%)
The
sessio
n
started
on
time.
The
session
objectiv
es were
explaine
d at the
beginni
ng of
the
session.
The
resour
ce
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
demon
strated
experti
se of
the
topic.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
explained
the topics
in an
understa
ndable
level.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
accommo
dated my
concerns
and
questions
.
The time
and
pace
allotted
for each
session
was
sufficient
to
absorb
inputs or
to
accompli
sh
outputs.
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
establis
hes
rapport
with
particip
ants.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
checke
d for the
underst
anding
of
particip
ants
and
process
es their
respons
es.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
establishe
d and
maintaine
d a
positive/n
on-
threatenin
g and
comfortabl
e learning
environme
nt.
The
resourc
e
speaker
/subject
-matter
expert
demons
trated
good
commu
nication
skills
(verbal
and
non-
verbal).
The
resourc
e
speake
r/subje
ct-
matter
expert
used
appropr
iate
technol
ogy
with
ease
and
confide
nce.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
synthesiz
ed the
response
s of the
participa
nts and
the
activities
of the
session.
The
resource
speaker/s
ubject-
matter
expert
exhibited
flexibility
and
adaptabilit
y in the
delivery of
the
session to
ensure an
appropriat
e
response
to
unforesee
n
situations.
The
resource
speaker/
subject-
matter
expert
presente
d
him/hers
elf in a
professio
nal
manner.
The
sessi
on
ende
d on
time.
AVERAGE
3.98 4.00 3.98 3.96 3.98 4.00 3.98 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.98 4.00 4.00 3.98 3.99
Excellen
t
Excelle
nt
Excelle
nt
Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellen
t
Excellent Excellent
EXCELLE
NT
SESSION 3
RESOURCE PERSON: MRS. CONCEPCION
MABINI

NO. OF
RESPONSES:190
SUMMARY OF THE SESSION & RESOURCE PERSON EVALUATION
DR.
GEONZON
A.
GACELOS
J.
Cheng
DR.
GEONZON
A.
Dacut
W.
Montejo
R.
Cabadsan
Dr.
Cajes
Dr.
Cajes
Dr.
Doroja
Dr.
Doroja
C.
Mabini
AVERAGE
3.99 3.98 3.98 3.99 3.97 3.84 3.97 3.96 3.96 3.99 3.99 3.99 3.97
Excellent Excellent
Excellent Excelle
nt
Excellen
t
Excell
ent
Excellen
t
Excelle
nt
Excelle
nt
Excelle
nt
Excelle
nt
Excell
ent
EXCELLE
NT

DAY 1, 2 and DAY 3 ON SESSION AND
RESOURCE PERSON EVALUATION
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3
3.98 3.95 3.97

NO. OF
RESPONSES:588
OVER-ALL SUMMARY OF THE
QAME RESULTS FOR DAY 3
PART I
PROGRAM
MANAGEMENT
PART II
TRAINING
VENUE
PART III
ACCOMMODA
TION
PART IV
PROGRAM
PROPER
PART V
SESSION & RP
EVALUATION
AVERAGE
3.97 3.91 3.83 3.97 3.97 3.93

OVER-ALL COMPARISON OF QAME
RESULTS OF DAY 1,2 and DAY 3
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3
3.88 3.89 3.93

QUALITATIVE DATA ON
QAME END-OF-
SESSION RESULTS

QUALITATIVE RESULTS HARVESTED
THROUGH THE ONLINE QAME TOOL
1. The facilitator portrays enthusiasm and utmost expertise in delivering the
topic. (Science Class B)
2. The training is also valuable for the elementary teachers because it involves
in teaching practice and the quality learner we aim to have. (Science Class B)
3. Provide us the slide presented by the resource speaker. Because the ones
given to the participants is different from the ones used by the RS. (English
Class B)
4. Rooms on the 5th floor has a slow internet connectivity (English Class A)
5. During breakfast, bananas should not be served because according to
research, it's not good to eat bananas at that time. I would suggest that
apples should be served. Thank you! (English Class B)

QUALITATIVE RESULTS HARVESTED
THROUGH THE ONLINE QAME TOOL
1. Thank you for the training bag. (Science Class A)
2. The activities given allows us to get engaged more in practicing how to craft
questions, acceptable answers and rationalization.
3. Food is better today. Thank you. (Science Class A)
4. I hope the next speaker will have the same strategy in delivering the topic. Coz it
was really fun. I enjoyed a lot (Science Class B)
5. Maybe more time to answer next time and more worksheets. (Science Class
A)

HOTS QAME RESULTS DAY 1 TO DAY 3 AND EVALUATION

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to HOTS QAME RESULTS DAY 1 TO DAY 3 AND EVALUATION

Similar to HOTS QAME RESULTS DAY 1 TO DAY 3 AND EVALUATION (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

HOTS QAME RESULTS DAY 1 TO DAY 3 AND EVALUATION