Identification of Heterotrophic
Contaminants from Nitrifying
bioreactors
Aidan Maxwell | Luis Sayavedra-soto Lab |
May 2015
Outline
○ Why heterotrophs?
○ Seven heterotroph contaminants from three separate bioreactors:
○ N. europaea & N. winogradsky Consortium bioreactor
○ 2x N. hamburgensis bioreactors
○ Basic heterotroph characteristics
○ conclusion
Heterotrophic relationships
○ What are some characteristics of heterotrophs growing with nitrifying bacteria?
○ Denitrifying activity
○ Consumers of alternative products
○ Saprophytic or predatory bacteria
N. hamburgensis Chemostat Experiments
○ N. Hamburgensis bioreactors:
○ 60 mM NaNO2 media
○ Nitrobacter hamburgensis: Nitrite oxidizer – Nitrate producer
○ One Crashed
○ Neutral effect
○ Three contaminants isolated
○ Two from the bioreactor that crashed
○ One from the bioreactor that had a neutral effect
N. europaea & N. winogradskyi consortium
experiment
○ Consortium Bioreactor:
○ 60 mM NH4+ media
○ Nitrosomonas europaea: Ammonium oxidizer – Nitrite producer
○ Nitrobacter winogradskyi: Nitrite oxidizer – Nitrate producer
○ Heterotroph contaminants present
○ Observed increase in OD600 of N. europaea and N. winogradskyi with contaminants
○ Four contaminants isolated
○ Two small colony & two large colony
Process of Identification
○ Contaminants were streaked onto LB agar plates directly from bioreactor aqueous media
○ 60% glycerol stocks of contaminants were made when individual colonies could be isolated on
plates. Stocks kept at -80˚C
○ DNA stocks made for all contaminants besides the two large colony contaminants
○ PCR for 16S ribosomal subunit sequence
○ Primers: BAC 311 & BAC 797 (486bp)
○ Sanger sequencing – OSU CGRB
○ BLAST the sequencing results
Sequencing Results: N. Hamburgensis
contaminant
○ Gordonia terrae – 99%
○ Nitrilase – CN functional group
hydrolysis
○ β-glucosidase – polysaccharide
degradation
○ Benzothiophene desulfurization
Sequencing Results: N. Hamburgensis
contaminant
○ Microbacterium oxydans – 100%
○ Diverse metabolism
○ Chitinase
○ Heavy metal water treatment
Sequencing Results: N. Hamburgensis
contaminant
○ Bacillus horikoshii – 99%
○ Denitrification activity
○ Alkaliphilic
Sequencing results: Consortium
contaminant
○ Shinella zoogloeoides – 99%
○ N2O reducer
○ Pyridine is sole C and N source
Sequencing results: Consortium
contaminant
○ Flavobacterium lindanitolerans – 100%
○ No presence of nitrate reductase
○ Diverse metabolism
Sequencing results: Consortium
contaminant
○ Achromobacter mucicolens – 99%
Sequencing results: Consortium
contaminant
○ Stenotrophomonas maltophilia – 99%
○ Predatory
○ Diverse metabolism
○ Ubiquitous in aqueous environments
Conclusion and Future Studies
○ Heterotrophs are diverse
○ Sequence entire 16S rDNA?
○ Additional consortium experiments
Acknowledgements
○ OSU CGRB
○ Luis Sayavedra-Soto Lab
○ Taylor Barns
○ Brett Mellbye

Heterotroph Isolation Presentaion

  • 1.
    Identification of Heterotrophic Contaminantsfrom Nitrifying bioreactors Aidan Maxwell | Luis Sayavedra-soto Lab | May 2015
  • 2.
    Outline ○ Why heterotrophs? ○Seven heterotroph contaminants from three separate bioreactors: ○ N. europaea & N. winogradsky Consortium bioreactor ○ 2x N. hamburgensis bioreactors ○ Basic heterotroph characteristics ○ conclusion
  • 3.
    Heterotrophic relationships ○ Whatare some characteristics of heterotrophs growing with nitrifying bacteria? ○ Denitrifying activity ○ Consumers of alternative products ○ Saprophytic or predatory bacteria
  • 4.
    N. hamburgensis ChemostatExperiments ○ N. Hamburgensis bioreactors: ○ 60 mM NaNO2 media ○ Nitrobacter hamburgensis: Nitrite oxidizer – Nitrate producer ○ One Crashed ○ Neutral effect ○ Three contaminants isolated ○ Two from the bioreactor that crashed ○ One from the bioreactor that had a neutral effect
  • 5.
    N. europaea &N. winogradskyi consortium experiment ○ Consortium Bioreactor: ○ 60 mM NH4+ media ○ Nitrosomonas europaea: Ammonium oxidizer – Nitrite producer ○ Nitrobacter winogradskyi: Nitrite oxidizer – Nitrate producer ○ Heterotroph contaminants present ○ Observed increase in OD600 of N. europaea and N. winogradskyi with contaminants ○ Four contaminants isolated ○ Two small colony & two large colony
  • 6.
    Process of Identification ○Contaminants were streaked onto LB agar plates directly from bioreactor aqueous media ○ 60% glycerol stocks of contaminants were made when individual colonies could be isolated on plates. Stocks kept at -80˚C ○ DNA stocks made for all contaminants besides the two large colony contaminants ○ PCR for 16S ribosomal subunit sequence ○ Primers: BAC 311 & BAC 797 (486bp) ○ Sanger sequencing – OSU CGRB ○ BLAST the sequencing results
  • 7.
    Sequencing Results: N.Hamburgensis contaminant ○ Gordonia terrae – 99% ○ Nitrilase – CN functional group hydrolysis ○ β-glucosidase – polysaccharide degradation ○ Benzothiophene desulfurization
  • 8.
    Sequencing Results: N.Hamburgensis contaminant ○ Microbacterium oxydans – 100% ○ Diverse metabolism ○ Chitinase ○ Heavy metal water treatment
  • 9.
    Sequencing Results: N.Hamburgensis contaminant ○ Bacillus horikoshii – 99% ○ Denitrification activity ○ Alkaliphilic
  • 10.
    Sequencing results: Consortium contaminant ○Shinella zoogloeoides – 99% ○ N2O reducer ○ Pyridine is sole C and N source
  • 11.
    Sequencing results: Consortium contaminant ○Flavobacterium lindanitolerans – 100% ○ No presence of nitrate reductase ○ Diverse metabolism
  • 12.
    Sequencing results: Consortium contaminant ○Achromobacter mucicolens – 99%
  • 13.
    Sequencing results: Consortium contaminant ○Stenotrophomonas maltophilia – 99% ○ Predatory ○ Diverse metabolism ○ Ubiquitous in aqueous environments
  • 14.
    Conclusion and FutureStudies ○ Heterotrophs are diverse ○ Sequence entire 16S rDNA? ○ Additional consortium experiments
  • 15.
    Acknowledgements ○ OSU CGRB ○Luis Sayavedra-Soto Lab ○ Taylor Barns ○ Brett Mellbye