The document outlines the components of an effective health program, including objectives, target population, goals, activities, and evaluation. It discusses the African American Health Program as an example, which aims to eliminate health disparities among African Americans through education, prevention, and capacity building initiatives. Key elements that make a program effective include using a theoretical model, clearly defining the problem and population, establishing measurable goals and objectives, implementing appropriate activities, and conducting ongoing monitoring and evaluation.
Presentation is about the uniqueness of Implementation Research and Role of the Government, specially in Indian context of health programme implementation.
Social Networks for Data Use: How we can leverage a world of connections to i...MEASURE Evaluation
Presented by Michelle Li, MEASURE Evaluation; Daines Mgidange, PATH; and Sarah Romorini, Population Services International, for a December 2017 webinar.
Presentation is about the uniqueness of Implementation Research and Role of the Government, specially in Indian context of health programme implementation.
Social Networks for Data Use: How we can leverage a world of connections to i...MEASURE Evaluation
Presented by Michelle Li, MEASURE Evaluation; Daines Mgidange, PATH; and Sarah Romorini, Population Services International, for a December 2017 webinar.
This presentation is from a recent CALPACT webinar. To view the event archive page to access the recording and resources, please visit:
https://cc.readytalk.com/cc/s/meetingArchive?eventId=ws23yprxpjgd&campaignId=xceb0hiurg66
Public Health professionals communicate with a variety of audiences in their daily work. While reasonably well-accepted that special consideration be given to low-literate health care consumers in clinical settings, less emphasis has been given to applying health literacy in diverse sectors of public health. Poor health literacy is not limited to those with language or reading skill barriers - only 12% of Americans understand the health information they receive.
As public health professionals we have a responsibility to understand the health literacy barriers. This presentation will provide tips and resources where public health professionals can make a difference in increasing the success of their communication efforts.
While one flu season can pass mildly and with minimal activity, another may hit the country early and hard. CDC health communicators work with subject matter experts and stakeholders to develop messages for a variety of audiences, employing different types of media for effective reach. Due to unforeseen variables, the 2012-2013 flu season posed specific challenges. This presentation will highlight some of those challenges, showcase strategies and messaging used, and preview what’s to come for the 2013-2014 season.
This webinar was the second session in the CALPACT sponsored Health Communication Matters series, which will help participants in all walks of public health to apply health literacy principles to their everyday communications.
Follow Us on Twitter: @CALPACT
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/CALPACTUCB
Website: www.calpact.org
Questions?
Email sphcalpact@berkeley.edu
While this list represents the desirable attributes of indicators most useful for these purposes, it is recognized that few indicators are likely to meet all of these criteria.
Hence, these criteria serve as a benchmark for weighing the potential costs and benefits of selecting one indicator over another.
Emerging Public Health Issues Health Equity (Page 3) Public Health Accreditat...CookCountyPLACEMATTERS
"This tip sheet is provided to accredited health departments to use as they prepare their annual reports." "Health equity is noted as an emerging public health issue because best and promising practices are moving the science and practice of public health beyond the traditional considerations of minority health and health disparities to more comprehensive concepts associated with ensuring deliberate consideration of the multiple determinants of health."
- - -
CMS Innovation Center
http://innovation.cms.gov
We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy:
http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/comment_policy.html
CMS Privacy Policy
http://cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Aboutwebsite/Privacy-Policy.html
Health Empowerment for You (HEY) is an evidence-based cancer and chronic disease prevention curriculum developed with and for First Nations to promote healthy living and reduce incidences of disease. FSIN worked in partnership with a diverse group of stakeholders from both Manitoba and Saskatchewan to develop an innovative culturally relevant training curriculum that integrates First Nations history and culture with primary and secondary prevention strategies for cancer and chronic disease.
Sustainability and Health Systems Strengthening: What Have We Learned?MEASURE Evaluation
Presented by Xavier Alterescu as part of the Brown Bag Series given at USAID on MEASURE Evaluation's contribution to the Global Health Initiative Principles
Aetna Presentation Social Determinants of Latino HealthDanny Santibanez
Social Determinants of Hispanic/Latino Health
Daniel Santibanez, MPH, RD, University of North Florida
September 23, 2005 - UNF Hispanic Health Issues Seminars
This is part 8 of an 8 part series of seminars on Hispanic Health Issues brought to you by the University of North Florida’s Dept. of Public Health, College of Health, a grant from AETNA, and the cooperation of the Duval County Health Department.
A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...HFG Project
Factors that influence performance of community health workers (CHWs) delivering health services are not well understood. A recent logic model proposed categories of support from both health sector and communities influence CHW performance and program outcomes. This logic model has been used to review a growth monitoring program delivered by CHWs in Honduras, known as Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C). A retrospective review of AIN-C was conducted through a document desk review and supplemented with in-depth interviews. Documents were systematically coded using the categories from the logic model, and gaps were addressed through interviews. Authors reviewed coded data for each category to analyze program details and outcomes as well as identify potential issues and gaps in the logic model.
The Accountable Health Communities Model team hosted a webinar to provide an overview of the new funding opportunity and application requirements for Track 1 on Wednesday, September 14, 2016 from 2:00p.m. – 3:00p.m. EDT.
- - -
CMS Innovation Center
http://innovation.cms.gov
We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy:
http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/comment_policy.html
CMS Privacy Policy
http://cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Aboutwebsite/Privacy-Policy.html
What Makes a Good Performance Management Plan? A new tool for managersMEASURE Evaluation
Led by Tory M. Taylor, a monitoring and evaluation specialist with MEASURE Evaluation from Tulane University.
The webinar introduced a tool to assist project managers in conducting effective Performance Management Plan (PMP) reviews. The tool provides feedback to implementing partners and is a brief, comprehensive checklist that covers the essential elements of a comprehensive PMP.
Running head PSYCHOLOGY1PSYCHOLOGY7Programmatic pur.docxtoltonkendal
Running head: PSYCHOLOGY
1
PSYCHOLOGY
7
Programmatic purposes and outcomes
Shekima Jacob
South University
Programmatic purposes and outcomes
Select and discuss three programmatic purposes and outcomes that should be evaluated. In your discussion, provide the rationale for the purposes and outcomes selected. It will be assumed the purposes and outcomes selected were influenced by the program being evaluated.
The program that I will be discussing is human service programs. In the abiding endeavor to enhance human service programs, service providers, policy makers and funders are more and more recognizing the significance of thorough program evaluations. They want to know what the programs achieve, what they spend, and how they must be operated to attain maximum cost efficiency. They want to recognize which programs function for which groups, and they need endings based on proof, as opposed to impassioned pleas and testimonials. The purposes should state the extensive, extensive range result that maintains the mission of the program, including content information areas, performance prospects, and values anticipated of program graduates. Purposes can be stated in wider and more stirring language than outcomes that have to be measurable and specific. Outcome is the reason nonprofit organizations struggle to build capacity and deliver programs. Measurement of outcomes is the systematic way of assessing the extent to which a program has attained its intended results.
The programmatic purposes and outcomes that should be evaluated include:
Programmatic purposes
· To monitor functions for the Health and Human Services department.
Without departments, the purpose or goals of human services would be very hard to fulfill. Human services is a very large sector that entails a wide range of skills, knowledge and disciplines focused on enhancing the well being of human both collectively and individually. Just like there are a lot of sectors in human services, so too there are a huge variety of functions of the human service programs that need to be evaluated so as to accomplish the purpose of the program (Connell, Kubisch, Schorr & Weiss, 1995). One of the programmatic purposes of human service programs is to monitor functions for the Health and Human Services department. Any department or even sector requires frequent checks to make sure that it is functioning well and according to the purpose. This purpose is very crucial in the execution of the human service program goals. It needs to be evaluated to make sure that the functions of the health and human service department are in line with the programmatic purposes of the program.
· Assessing internal control over compliance requirements to provide reasonable assurance.
The compliance requirements are very crucial in every program as they make sure that the program is in line with its goals and makes sure it works towards achieving its stipulated outcomes. This purpose needs to be evaluated to m ...
Process of Planning and EvaluationThe process of planning and ev.docxstilliegeorgiana
Process of Planning and Evaluation
The process of planning and evaluation is cyclical and their activities are interdependent. The activities happen in stages; the end of one activity or program leads to the next. The ideas, insights, and learning derived from a particular stage are likely to affect the decisions and activities of the next stage.
Despite this, the process of planning and evaluation is usually presented in a linear manner with sequential steps. The cycle is often affected by external influences. Planners and evaluators need to be flexible in responding to these influences
Health Program Models
Good health programs involve a good deal of effort and a well-developed model. These models provide direction and structure to the program to be built on. The models may not be used completely during the planning process, or various parts of the model may be combined to suit the program. There are some commonly used models in health program planning:
· Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling Constructs in Educational Diagnosis and Evaluation (PRECEDE)-Policy, Regulatory, and Organizational Constructs in Educational and Environmental Development (PROCEED): Commonly known as the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, it is the most well-known model in this field because it is theoretically grounded and comprehensive. Planning, implementation, and evaluation are all combined in this model.
· The Model for Health Education Planning (MHEP) analyzes:
· Planning through six phases
· Content through three dimensions―subject matter, method, and process
· The Comprehensive Health Education Model (CHEM) consists of six major steps and several suggested procedures within each step.
· The Model for Health Education Planning and Resource Development (MHEPRD) is a less known model. The five major components of this model are―health education plans, demonstration programs, educational programs, research programs, and information and statistics. Each component represents the end result of the planning process. In this model, evaluation plays an integral part in each phase of the model.
Written Assignment 1: Quality of Simulation
Chapter 3 discusses methods to assess the quality of simulations. You learned about three different views of simulation quality.
Suppose you lead a task force that is developing a simulation to provide strategic planning recommendations for property use zoning for a county of 750,000 residents. The zoning board and county commissioners want a simulation that allows them to assess the impact of various zoning decisions based on a variety of dynamic factors, including age, race, education, and income status.
Submit a 2-page (double-spaced) paper addressing the following:
1. First, identify which of the three views discussed in the chapter that would provide the best quality assessment for the situation described above, and explain your decision.
2. Explain how would you ensure the highest level of accuracy with your simulation, and how w ...
This presentation is from a recent CALPACT webinar. To view the event archive page to access the recording and resources, please visit:
https://cc.readytalk.com/cc/s/meetingArchive?eventId=ws23yprxpjgd&campaignId=xceb0hiurg66
Public Health professionals communicate with a variety of audiences in their daily work. While reasonably well-accepted that special consideration be given to low-literate health care consumers in clinical settings, less emphasis has been given to applying health literacy in diverse sectors of public health. Poor health literacy is not limited to those with language or reading skill barriers - only 12% of Americans understand the health information they receive.
As public health professionals we have a responsibility to understand the health literacy barriers. This presentation will provide tips and resources where public health professionals can make a difference in increasing the success of their communication efforts.
While one flu season can pass mildly and with minimal activity, another may hit the country early and hard. CDC health communicators work with subject matter experts and stakeholders to develop messages for a variety of audiences, employing different types of media for effective reach. Due to unforeseen variables, the 2012-2013 flu season posed specific challenges. This presentation will highlight some of those challenges, showcase strategies and messaging used, and preview what’s to come for the 2013-2014 season.
This webinar was the second session in the CALPACT sponsored Health Communication Matters series, which will help participants in all walks of public health to apply health literacy principles to their everyday communications.
Follow Us on Twitter: @CALPACT
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/CALPACTUCB
Website: www.calpact.org
Questions?
Email sphcalpact@berkeley.edu
While this list represents the desirable attributes of indicators most useful for these purposes, it is recognized that few indicators are likely to meet all of these criteria.
Hence, these criteria serve as a benchmark for weighing the potential costs and benefits of selecting one indicator over another.
Emerging Public Health Issues Health Equity (Page 3) Public Health Accreditat...CookCountyPLACEMATTERS
"This tip sheet is provided to accredited health departments to use as they prepare their annual reports." "Health equity is noted as an emerging public health issue because best and promising practices are moving the science and practice of public health beyond the traditional considerations of minority health and health disparities to more comprehensive concepts associated with ensuring deliberate consideration of the multiple determinants of health."
- - -
CMS Innovation Center
http://innovation.cms.gov
We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy:
http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/comment_policy.html
CMS Privacy Policy
http://cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Aboutwebsite/Privacy-Policy.html
Health Empowerment for You (HEY) is an evidence-based cancer and chronic disease prevention curriculum developed with and for First Nations to promote healthy living and reduce incidences of disease. FSIN worked in partnership with a diverse group of stakeholders from both Manitoba and Saskatchewan to develop an innovative culturally relevant training curriculum that integrates First Nations history and culture with primary and secondary prevention strategies for cancer and chronic disease.
Sustainability and Health Systems Strengthening: What Have We Learned?MEASURE Evaluation
Presented by Xavier Alterescu as part of the Brown Bag Series given at USAID on MEASURE Evaluation's contribution to the Global Health Initiative Principles
Aetna Presentation Social Determinants of Latino HealthDanny Santibanez
Social Determinants of Hispanic/Latino Health
Daniel Santibanez, MPH, RD, University of North Florida
September 23, 2005 - UNF Hispanic Health Issues Seminars
This is part 8 of an 8 part series of seminars on Hispanic Health Issues brought to you by the University of North Florida’s Dept. of Public Health, College of Health, a grant from AETNA, and the cooperation of the Duval County Health Department.
A retrospective review of the Honduras AIN-C program guided by a community he...HFG Project
Factors that influence performance of community health workers (CHWs) delivering health services are not well understood. A recent logic model proposed categories of support from both health sector and communities influence CHW performance and program outcomes. This logic model has been used to review a growth monitoring program delivered by CHWs in Honduras, known as Atención Integral a la Niñez en la Comunidad (AIN-C). A retrospective review of AIN-C was conducted through a document desk review and supplemented with in-depth interviews. Documents were systematically coded using the categories from the logic model, and gaps were addressed through interviews. Authors reviewed coded data for each category to analyze program details and outcomes as well as identify potential issues and gaps in the logic model.
The Accountable Health Communities Model team hosted a webinar to provide an overview of the new funding opportunity and application requirements for Track 1 on Wednesday, September 14, 2016 from 2:00p.m. – 3:00p.m. EDT.
- - -
CMS Innovation Center
http://innovation.cms.gov
We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy:
http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/comment_policy.html
CMS Privacy Policy
http://cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Aboutwebsite/Privacy-Policy.html
What Makes a Good Performance Management Plan? A new tool for managersMEASURE Evaluation
Led by Tory M. Taylor, a monitoring and evaluation specialist with MEASURE Evaluation from Tulane University.
The webinar introduced a tool to assist project managers in conducting effective Performance Management Plan (PMP) reviews. The tool provides feedback to implementing partners and is a brief, comprehensive checklist that covers the essential elements of a comprehensive PMP.
Running head PSYCHOLOGY1PSYCHOLOGY7Programmatic pur.docxtoltonkendal
Running head: PSYCHOLOGY
1
PSYCHOLOGY
7
Programmatic purposes and outcomes
Shekima Jacob
South University
Programmatic purposes and outcomes
Select and discuss three programmatic purposes and outcomes that should be evaluated. In your discussion, provide the rationale for the purposes and outcomes selected. It will be assumed the purposes and outcomes selected were influenced by the program being evaluated.
The program that I will be discussing is human service programs. In the abiding endeavor to enhance human service programs, service providers, policy makers and funders are more and more recognizing the significance of thorough program evaluations. They want to know what the programs achieve, what they spend, and how they must be operated to attain maximum cost efficiency. They want to recognize which programs function for which groups, and they need endings based on proof, as opposed to impassioned pleas and testimonials. The purposes should state the extensive, extensive range result that maintains the mission of the program, including content information areas, performance prospects, and values anticipated of program graduates. Purposes can be stated in wider and more stirring language than outcomes that have to be measurable and specific. Outcome is the reason nonprofit organizations struggle to build capacity and deliver programs. Measurement of outcomes is the systematic way of assessing the extent to which a program has attained its intended results.
The programmatic purposes and outcomes that should be evaluated include:
Programmatic purposes
· To monitor functions for the Health and Human Services department.
Without departments, the purpose or goals of human services would be very hard to fulfill. Human services is a very large sector that entails a wide range of skills, knowledge and disciplines focused on enhancing the well being of human both collectively and individually. Just like there are a lot of sectors in human services, so too there are a huge variety of functions of the human service programs that need to be evaluated so as to accomplish the purpose of the program (Connell, Kubisch, Schorr & Weiss, 1995). One of the programmatic purposes of human service programs is to monitor functions for the Health and Human Services department. Any department or even sector requires frequent checks to make sure that it is functioning well and according to the purpose. This purpose is very crucial in the execution of the human service program goals. It needs to be evaluated to make sure that the functions of the health and human service department are in line with the programmatic purposes of the program.
· Assessing internal control over compliance requirements to provide reasonable assurance.
The compliance requirements are very crucial in every program as they make sure that the program is in line with its goals and makes sure it works towards achieving its stipulated outcomes. This purpose needs to be evaluated to m ...
Process of Planning and EvaluationThe process of planning and ev.docxstilliegeorgiana
Process of Planning and Evaluation
The process of planning and evaluation is cyclical and their activities are interdependent. The activities happen in stages; the end of one activity or program leads to the next. The ideas, insights, and learning derived from a particular stage are likely to affect the decisions and activities of the next stage.
Despite this, the process of planning and evaluation is usually presented in a linear manner with sequential steps. The cycle is often affected by external influences. Planners and evaluators need to be flexible in responding to these influences
Health Program Models
Good health programs involve a good deal of effort and a well-developed model. These models provide direction and structure to the program to be built on. The models may not be used completely during the planning process, or various parts of the model may be combined to suit the program. There are some commonly used models in health program planning:
· Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling Constructs in Educational Diagnosis and Evaluation (PRECEDE)-Policy, Regulatory, and Organizational Constructs in Educational and Environmental Development (PROCEED): Commonly known as the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, it is the most well-known model in this field because it is theoretically grounded and comprehensive. Planning, implementation, and evaluation are all combined in this model.
· The Model for Health Education Planning (MHEP) analyzes:
· Planning through six phases
· Content through three dimensions―subject matter, method, and process
· The Comprehensive Health Education Model (CHEM) consists of six major steps and several suggested procedures within each step.
· The Model for Health Education Planning and Resource Development (MHEPRD) is a less known model. The five major components of this model are―health education plans, demonstration programs, educational programs, research programs, and information and statistics. Each component represents the end result of the planning process. In this model, evaluation plays an integral part in each phase of the model.
Written Assignment 1: Quality of Simulation
Chapter 3 discusses methods to assess the quality of simulations. You learned about three different views of simulation quality.
Suppose you lead a task force that is developing a simulation to provide strategic planning recommendations for property use zoning for a county of 750,000 residents. The zoning board and county commissioners want a simulation that allows them to assess the impact of various zoning decisions based on a variety of dynamic factors, including age, race, education, and income status.
Submit a 2-page (double-spaced) paper addressing the following:
1. First, identify which of the three views discussed in the chapter that would provide the best quality assessment for the situation described above, and explain your decision.
2. Explain how would you ensure the highest level of accuracy with your simulation, and how w ...
Identifying the basic purposes and scope of M&E. Describing the functions of an M&E plan. Identifying and understanding the main components of an M&E plan
Designing and Developing a Health Education ProgramDesigning a hea.docxgalinagrabow44ms
Designing and Developing a Health Education Program
Designing a health education program involves the determination of goals and objectives, the creation of an intervention, the determination of the logistics of the intervention, the development of materials that appropriately meet the needs of the target audience, and the planning of the program evaluation. Design the framework for a health education program that meets the needs of the target population
(Child Obesity)
Refer to the CDCynergy's
Phase 2: Analyze Problem
,
Phase 3:Plan Intervention
, and
Phase 4:Develop Intervention
guides. Your assignment for this week must contain each of the following sections:
Describe the setting, the health concern, and the target audience. Use health concern and target population of
Child Obesity.
Develop goals and objectives (Refer to
The Cause/Effect Structuring Guide (C/ETSG)
and the
Intervention theory Structuring Guide(ITSG)
via the
CDCynergy
resource.)
Determine methods to achieve these goals and objectives
Are these goals reasonable and attainable?
Select health education theories and models that will be incorporated into the design.
How would your selected theories or models address health literacy?
How would they address cultural appropriateness?
Outline the health information that will be provided to the target population.
Give specific examples of the resources that you will provide.
Include citation information for each resource.
Determine the modes of delivery of the information.
Where will the program take place? At a facility? Online? National or local?
How will the target audience obtain the information? Or how will it be provided?
Is this an acute intervention (one time education)? Or will the education take place over a longer period of time?
Anticipate barriers and problems of implementation.
What are some problems that could impede the ability of the program to meet the goals?
How might these problems be addressed?
Identify the outcomes that will be measured to evaluate the effectiveness of the program.
How will these outcomes be measured?
Are they related to the goals and objectives?
Your assignment must be a minimum of three- to- four-pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and should include a minimum of three scholarly sources cited according to APA guidelines
.
SOC-480 Program Evaluation Essay Checklist It is es.docxwhitneyleman54422
SOC-480: Program Evaluation Essay Checklist
It is essential for social workers to be able to evaluate an existing program within a community in order to develop a proposal for an effective project/program that fills the needs of a community. Remember, you are looking for a gap in services provided and a project/program solution as to how your proposal will fill that gap.
This assignment will help you learn this skill.
Read chapter eleven in the textbook and use Step 2 of the SAMHSA Strategic Prevention Framework to guide you in evaluating the agency or program you select.
Select a local agency/program that addresses your selected social issue. View the agency/program’s website and call or visit the agency/program and use the checklist below to interview the manager:
Name of agency/program you contacted: Catholic charities/ Immigrants in Houston, the Nation's Most Diverse Metropolitan Area
What is the mission statement/vision the program/agency?
Our Mission is to provide service to those in need, to advocate compassion and justice in the structures of society, and to call all people of goodwill to do the same.
What theory (theories) is the program based on?
Describe the target population of the program.
This program focuses on poverty and legal right for immigrants. They also work with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a benefit that came to be as an executive order from the president on June 2012. It provides protection against deportation and employment authorization to eligible people that were brought into the country as minors before June 15, 2007.
What are the stated goals and objectives of the program? How does the agency/program measure the current program outcomes according to the program’s existing evaluation practices?
What are the data collection procedures? (Surveys, questionnaires, etc.) Explain if these procedures have been effective or not.
American Community Survey (ACS), the authors tabulate numbers of immigrants potentially in need of community-based immigration assistance. The report finds that an estimated 350,000 legal permanent residents, most of them from Mexico and Central America, are eligible for naturalization but have not yet applied. In addition, nearly half of the metro area's 400,000 unauthorized immigrants are potentially eligible for either DACA or the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program.
What are the data analysis strategies that they use? Explain if these strategies have been effective or not.
Who are the community stakeholders involved in the program? Attorneys, Case managers, Counselors, and the community as a whole.
List some of the resources available to which clients (the target population) are referred:
Nine Ways to Protect Yourself
Enforcement Actions on Sensitive Locations
DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals)
Basic needs and Disaster relief
Sanctuary Jurisdictions (including SB4)
Detention in Houston
Non-prof.
HCM 3305, Community Health 1 Course Learning Outcom.docxaryan532920
HCM 3305, Community Health 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
3. Recognize effective organization and promotion of health programming for community health on a
global scale.
3.1. Assess the steps for organizing a community health program.
3.2. Identify steps needed to effectively evaluate the community health program.
Reading Assignment
Chapter 15:
Systems Thinking and Leadership in Community and Public Health
Unit Lesson
In this unit, we will discuss systems thinking and community health programming.
Community organizing is a process that involves the engagement of individuals, groups, and organizations.
Program planning is not required in community organizing; however, it is often times used. Program planning
is a process where a health intervention is planned to meet the needs within a population. Antiviolence
campaigns and stress management courses are examples of program planning (McKenzie, Pinger, & Kotecki,
2012).
When deciding which community health interventions to create, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) uses Guide to Community Preventive Services (Community Guide). The Community Guide
is considered credible because it is based off the scientific systematic review process. The guide answers
many questions that are critical to community health on subjects such as
interventions that have worked/did not work,
populations in which the intervention worked/did not work,
cost of the intervention,
benefits/risks of the intervention, and
future research recommendations (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015).
Community health programs are intricate and are a key factor in disease prevention, improving health, and
increasing quality of life. Health status and behaviors are determined by personal, environmental, policy, and
organizational influences. Community health programming is targeted at reaching the goals of Healthy People
2010. Community health programs are generally held within healthcare settings; however, other settings are
becoming more popular. Programs are being held at schools, worksites, religious organizations, and within
communities (Healthy People 2020, 2015). There are instances where healthcare organizations are
collaborating with schools to offer health programs. For instance, nutrition and exercise programs are being
offered at an increased rate. Employers see the value of employee health. Therefore, many employers offer
incentives to employees who take part in employee wellness programs. It is not far fetched to hear about
employers checking cholesterol, blood pressure, quality of life, weight, BMI, and sometimes glucose. The
rationale is that healthy employees are less likely to call in sick with health-related conditions.
Community health professionals must identify their health issue, and then create specific and measurable
goals and objectives. ...
What is plan and how to make your plan successful? A successful work is a reflection of a disciplined, delicate and strictly maintained plan. These discipline is discussed in above discussion. I know it never can satisfy you, but it is the summery. And I hope it will help you.
A textbook must provide, first and foremost, information to assist the reader in better understanding the topic. Second, it ought to provide the information in a way that can be easily accessed and digested, and it needs to be credible. Textbooks
that have gone through multiple editions continue to improve as a result of reviewers’ comments and readers’ feedback, and this one is no exception. Looking back over the efforts associated with this Fifth Edition, the old wedding custom of “something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue” comes to
mind. We have built upon the solid foundation of previous editions, but then added “something new.” It almost goes without saying that we have “borrowed” from others in that we both cite and quote examples of program evaluation studies
from the literature. “Something blue” . . . well, we’re not sure about that. Those who have used the Fourth Edition might be interested in knowing what has changed in this new edition. Based on reviewers’ comments we have:
• Created a new chapter to explain sampling.
• Incorporated new material on designing questionnaires.
• Overhauled the chapter on qualitative evaluation. It is now “Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Evaluation.”
• Reworked the “Formative and Process Evaluation” chapter with expanded coverage on developing logic models.
• Added new studies and references; new Internet sources of information.
• Included new examples of measurement instruments (scales) with a macro
focus.
• Inserted new checklists and guides (such as ways to minimize and monitor for potential fidelity problems—Chapter 13).
• Revised the chapter “Writing Evaluation Proposals, Reports, and Journal Articles” to give it less of an academic slant. There’s new material on writing
executive summaries and considerations in planning and writing evaluation
reports for agencies.
• Deleted the chapter on Goal Attainment Scalin
69
4
C H A P T E R
Program Planning:
The Big Picture
69
Key Terms: planning committee, program ownership, program desired outcome,
potential program provider, potential consumer, evidence-based or science-based
The coalition feels good about their needs assessment. What an in-
teresting process it was, and they discovered much that they did not
know. Clearly, however, respirator y-related health problems are on the
rise, and cigarette smoking is by far the major contributor. Now, they
have to decide what to do.
Health professionals have always planned programs to achieve desirable ends,
such as to impact health status and improve the quality of life. Over the years,
planning has become more systematized and, as a result, potentially more ef-
fective. The planning models developed to assist in this process include
Precede–Proceed, PATCH, Model for Health Education Planning (MHEP), and
Comprehensive Health Education Model (CHEM) (McKenzie & Smeltzer,
2001). Although the models differ, there does appear to be some consistency
in the literature regarding recommendations for going about the program plan-
ning process. Suggested steps for program planning and general planning
principles will be reviewed in this chapter. The planner may conduct the plan-
ning activities in an order that differs from the one presented here, or a num-
ber of the described activities of program planning may be conducted
simultaneously. The size and past experiences of the planning committee may
influence the steps for planning, along with the size and scope of the program
being planned and implemented.
69
17487_Hodges_ch4_69_86 6/11/04 10:07 AM Page 69
70 Chapter 4: Program Planning: The Big Picture
Program Planning Steps
Step 1: Review the Needs Assessment
It is suggested that the planners conduct a review of the needs assessment data
and the resulting decisions that have been made up to this point. This review
will help to determine if the most appropriate recommendations for the di-
rection and outcome of the program have been made to meet the needs of the
target population. It is possible for the planning committee to identify addi-
tional data that are useful to shaping the intervention, which were not undis-
covered or overlooked in the initial needs assessment process. A large amount
of data may have been collected as part of the needs assessment, but during a
review, a skillful planning committee can organize and synthesize the infor-
mation into a format that provides meaning and value, which may not have
been obvious during the initial examination of the data (Aspen Reference
Group, 2002).
Box 4.1 Action steps to establish or strengthen a coordinated school
health program.
At the school level At the district level
Source: Fetro, J. V. (1998). Implementing coordinated school health programs in local schools. In
Marx, E. & Wooley, S. F. (eds.), Health is academic: A guide to coordinated school health programs
(p. 21). New York: Teachers.
Running Head DRAFTING A PROCESS EVALUATION1DRAFTING A PROCES.docxcharisellington63520
Running Head: DRAFTING A PROCESS EVALUATION 1
DRAFTING A PROCESS EVALUATION 7
Drafting a Process Evaluation
Introduction
The Service Coordinator program is a housing program that was created to deal with housing for the aged and those with disabilities in the United States of America. It has established many policies to ensure that elderly and physically challenged individuals who face low levels of income or no income are well cared for in the locations where they reside (US Department of Housing and Urban Development, n.d.).
The Resident Opportunities and Self Sufficiency (ROSS) grant was used initially for programs such as the ROSS-Family & Homeownership and ROSS-Elderly/Persons with Disabilities (US Department of Housing and Urban Development, n.d.). The program involves funding the housing program and also with hiring and maintaining service coordinators. The Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) were responsible for providing funds to run the program; the grant funds could then be used to pay the service coordinators salaries and other administrative expenses (US Department of Housing and Urban Development, n.d.).
Key Program Elements
The service coordinator program aims at improving the lifestyles of elder adults and those with disabilities. It provides supportive services to residents to keep them living independently as long as possible.
HUD focuses on improving public housing options for its residents to have comfortable places in which they can live safely and independently. Partnerships have been put in place between government agencies and property owners to ensure proper housing is available for residents regardless of their social and economic status (US Department of Housing and Urban Development, n.d.).
Strategies to produce change
The strategies used by the Housing Urban Development are to find quality residences for the physically challenged and the aged, which are strategically located, safe, accessible and affordable (US Department of Housing and Urban Development, n.d.). This is to ensure a comfortable home environment that makes them feel at home.
Since housing is a basic need, the program had a strategy of having quality places that showed improvement in the quality of life for those who reside there. They had to ensure that they were located in a friendly environment that could not discriminate against their odds.
There are strategies in place to reduce the number of people in society who are rendered homeless or have faced discrimination due to their disabilities and, therefore, have a home for them where they could be catered for and housed. These strategies implemented to assist in keeping individuals out of long-term care facilities while they age.
Need of the target population
The aged may encounter issues finding housing simply because they may have limited income or no income at all and cannot afford to house themselves. Physically challenged individuals may also face iss.
Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 5: Program PlanningINGENAES
This session discusses key issues to consider when starting an NGO. These presentations are are part of a workshop series that was implemented in Nepal and 2016 as part of the INGENAES initiative.
Similar to Health Promoters Program_HealthEduc series-1 (20)
Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 5: Program Planning
Health Promoters Program_HealthEduc series-1
1. Understanding the roadmap
for
Effective Health Programs
When Health is absent, wisdom cannot reveal itself, art cannot manifest, strength cannot fight, wealth becomes
useless, and intelligence cannot be applied” Herophilus of Chalcedon 335-280 BC
Presented by: Dr. Bimbola Idowu
2. • Objectives
• About African American Health Program
• Define effective health program
• Components of an effective health
program
Outline
3. At the end of this presentation health
promoters will be able to:
• Explain an effective health program
• Identify core components of an effective
health program
• List building models for your program
• Describe steps in at least one of the
models
Objectives
4. The African American Health Program
(AAHP) was created in 1999 and is
funded by the Montgomery County
Department of Health and Human
Services and administered by BETAH
Associates, Inc.
AAHP History
5. Our Mission
• To eliminate health disparities and
improve the number and quality of
years of life for African Americans and
people of African descent in
Montgomery County, MD
• AAHP serves Montgomery County
residents of all socio-economic
statuses
6. Our Goals
1. To raise awareness in the Montgomery
County community about key health
disparities.
2. To integrate African American health
concerns into existing services and
programs.
3. To monitor health status data for African
Americans in Montgomery County.
4. To implement and evaluate strategies to
achieve specific health objectives.
7. AAHP Strategy: Toward Health Equity
To bring together community partners and
resources in a collaborative and efficient
manner to support the goals of the
African American Health Program.
8. AAHP Health Disparity Areas
► Infant Mortality
► HIV/AIDS
► Cardiovascular
► Cancer
► Diabetes
► Oral Health
9. What is an effective Program?
Effective Program can simply be described as
a planned program based on evidence
(research) with clear and systemic strategies
for implementation
10. Importance of having an effective
Program
Use of programs especially for outreach have
emerged as a major strategy to:
facilitate education
prevention
information dissemination
capacity building in addressing health
related issues
11. Program Model
“A chart or visual diagram that provides representation of
how program activities/services are linked to desired
changes in the target population” Card & Akers, 2009
12. Components of an effective
Program (1 of 2)
Program model
Problem statement; formal theories of behavior
change – what is the problem; need or gap
Target population – who will benefit from this
intervention
Goals and objectives – what does the
intervention aim to achieve among the target
population
13. Components of an effective
Program (2 of 2)
Program model
Program activities; resources – what will
the intervention do; cultural sensitivity
Linkages to desired results – how the
intervention will have its intended results
Monitoring and Evaluation
14. Problem (1 of 2)
What is the Problem?
Need
e.g.- heart attacks as cause of death among young
African immigrants
Gap –addresses missing link between need &
services
e.g. no culturally designed brochures for African
immigrants
15. Problem (1 of 2)
Write the problem statement?
Content
vision, affected target, evidence of scope of
problem
Probable cause of the problem, gap
Ideas on how to address it
Indicators that show that the problem has been
addressed
16. Target
Who will benefit from this intervention?
Age, gender, race/ethnicity, culture
How do you identify the group of interest?
General observation
comments from members of the community;
news
Data – to justify your observation
Sources: local health department; community
health departments in case of studies by
academic staff
Community needs assessment
17. Goals & Objective (1 of 2)
Goal
Very important piece
Guides program planning and design
Communicates to stakeholders
Enables evaluation
Success is dependent upon realistic goals
18. Goals & Objective (1 of 2)
Goal
Characteristics
Describe the overall purpose of the program
Describe broad outcomes and concepts
(what we want to accomplish)
Expressed in general terms
19. Goals & Objective (1 of 2)
Objectives
Specifically state how the goals will be achieved
Are measurable: Define what you want to see
Encourage a consistent focus on program functions
Objectives are not Tasks
20. Objectives (1 of 2)
Characteristics
SMART
Specific: Be precise about what you are going to
achieve
Measurable: Quantify the objectives
Appropriate: Align with the needs of the target
audience
Realistic: Do you have the resources to make the
objective happen?
Time-Specific: State when you will achieve the
objective
22. Tool
Objective
Verb Metric Population Object
Baseline
Measure
Goal
Measure
Timeframe
Breakdown
register
Percent
age
Young
African
immigrants
in zip code
Healthy
heart class
0% 2%
December
2011
By December 2011, at least 2% of young African immigrants in
zip code 20904 will register for healthy heart class
apply Percentage
Healthy
heart
class
members
Young
African
immigrants
that apply
for class
-- 3% Annually
On an annual basis, at least 3% of members that apply to the
healthy heart class will be young African Immigrants
23. Program Activities (1 of )
2 planning models
Theory Logic model
Outcome approach model
Monitoring and Evaluation
24. Theory Logic Model (1 of 3)
What is a theory?
Lay man’s view
Guess, a hunch
Scientist’s view
A fact based framework for describing a
phenomenon
Provides a roadmap for understanding human
behavior, emotions, attitudes
Describes a behavior and makes predictions about
the future
Source: http://psychology.about.com/od/tindex/f/theory.htm
25. Theory Logic Model (2 of 3)
Examples:
The Health Belief Model
Information- Motivation Behavior Model
AIDS Risk Reduction Model
Theory of Reasoned action
Social Learning/ Cognitive Theory
26. Theory Logic Model (3 of 3)
Assumptions Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Impact
28. Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring
Built into the Input phase
Gathers descriptive data on operation of program
Answers of interest are:
What services are delivered?
What resources are used in the delivery?
Who is served – characteristics?
Do participants & staff like the program?
Describing “what is” without any attached
judgment
29. Evaluation (1 of 3)
Process
Who, what, where, when, how questions?
More comparative than monitoring
Assesses “what is” vs. “what was
intended/planned”
It helps discover what staff is doing? Which
participants are attending?
Tools: Data collection
Sign-in sheet
Designed form for staff and participant satisfaction
questionnaire
Various points
30. Evaluation (2 of 3)
Outcome
Focus is on program effectiveness
Short term, intermediate & long term
outcomes
Questions
Did the program make a difference in
participants?
Under what circumstances was the program most
effective?
What aspects of the program were responsible
for the changes?
31. Evaluation (3 of 3)
Outcome
Long term and impact outcomes very
tedious, takes time, money
Comparison is not only with the
participants but also with a comparative
group
Large sample size for identified differences
to be significant
Data collection at beginning, specified
intervals and at the end
32. Challenges & Barriers
Peculiar to every phase of the Program Model
Internal
Is it well articulated for others to understand & buy-
in?
Is it worth my agency investment?
Change in agency leadership
How many stakeholders would be brought on board
External
Government policy change in direction
Environmental – natural disasters, community
priorities
33. References
Card, J.J. & Akers, D.D. (2009). How to plan, implement and
evaluate your HIV Prevention Program. Sociometrics Press
Fisher, D., Chinman, M. et al. (2006) Getting to outcomes with
developmental assets: ten steps to measuring success in
Youth programs and communities
www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports
Fowler, C.J.C (2008). Achieving outcomes through best
process program design and evaluation. MAPHTC training
handout
Nagle, B. (2009). SMART: Developing effective goals and
objectives.
national.spacegrant.org/.../presentations/.../SpaceGrantPresenta
tionMarch09.ppt
W.K. Kellogg Foundation Evaluation Handbook/ Logic Model
Development Guide CD
What is a theory?
http://psychology.about.com/od/tindex/f/theory.htm