For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Midterm Case Study: Motivating Employees
Due Week 5 and worth 300 points
Imagine that you have been appointed the Director of Health at the Kaluyu Memorial Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya – a for-profit hospital. The facility is also a referral hospital and receives severe cases of accidents, chronicle / communicable diseases, and houses an HIV / AIDS ward. As you settle into your position, you realize that the employees always act scared as they approach their superiors. Some of the employees even
HSA 501 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.comBartholomew41
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Midterm Case Study: Motivating Employees
Due Week 5 and worth 300 points
Imagine that you have been appointed the Director of Health at the Kaluyu Memorial Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya – a for-profit hospital. The facility is also a referral hospital and receives severe cases of accidents, chronicle / communicable diseases, and houses an HIV
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Midterm Case Study: Motivating Employees
Due Week 5 and worth 300 points
Imagine that you have been appointed the Director of Health at the Kaluyu Memorial Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya – a
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
This is a comprehensive Individual Assignment consisting of seven parts spread out over the length of the course. Each section is graded individually; however you are expected to integrate each section into a final document with appropriate revisions based on the feedback from your instructor on each section.
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Midterm Case Study: Motivating Employees
Due Week 5 and worth 300 points
Imagine that you have been appointed the Director of Health at the Kaluyu Memorial Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya – a for-profit hospital. The facility is also a referral hospital and receives severe cases of accidents, chronicle / communicable diseases, and houses an HIV / AIDS ward. As you settle into your position, you realize that the employees always act scared as they approach their superiors. Some of the employees even
HSA 501 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.comBartholomew41
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Midterm Case Study: Motivating Employees
Due Week 5 and worth 300 points
Imagine that you have been appointed the Director of Health at the Kaluyu Memorial Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya – a for-profit hospital. The facility is also a referral hospital and receives severe cases of accidents, chronicle / communicable diseases, and houses an HIV
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Midterm Case Study: Motivating Employees
Due Week 5 and worth 300 points
Imagine that you have been appointed the Director of Health at the Kaluyu Memorial Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya – a
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
This is a comprehensive Individual Assignment consisting of seven parts spread out over the length of the course. Each section is graded individually; however you are expected to integrate each section into a final document with appropriate revisions based on the feedback from your instructor on each section.
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Tutorial Purchased: 5 Times, Rating: A+
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Tutorial Purchased: 5 Times, Rating: A+
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event o.docxsmithhedwards48727
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.
This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a similar adverse event or near miss.
Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.
The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand .
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or ne.docxsmithhedwards48727
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.
This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a similar adverse event or near miss.
Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.
The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understa.
Assessment 2 Instructions Needs Analysis for ChangeTop of Form.docxrobert345678
Assessment 2 Instructions: Needs Analysis for Change
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
·
PRINT
·
Complete a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization with which you are familiar, in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue.
Introduction
Note: Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.
Background and Context
As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.
Instructions
Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Overall, you will be assessed on the following criteria:
· Summarize your chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.
1. Reiterate your rationale for pursuing this issue, as well as the gap contributing to it that you identified in your previous assessment.
· Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.
2. Use at least one piece of evidence to support this disparity (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resources).
· Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.
3. For example, if your implementati.
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
HCS 451 Week 2 Assignment Quality Dimensions and Measures Table
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
HCS 451 Week 2 Assignment Quality Dimensions and Measures Table
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
HCS 451 Week 2 Assignment Quality Dimensions and Measures Table
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
HCS 451 Week 2 Assignment Quality Dimensions and Measures Table
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Tutorial Purchased: 5 Times, Rating: A+
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Tutorial Purchased: 5 Times, Rating: A+
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event o.docxsmithhedwards48727
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.
This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a similar adverse event or near miss.
Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.
The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand .
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or ne.docxsmithhedwards48727
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.
This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a similar adverse event or near miss.
Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.
The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understa.
Assessment 2 Instructions Needs Analysis for ChangeTop of Form.docxrobert345678
Assessment 2 Instructions: Needs Analysis for Change
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
·
PRINT
·
Complete a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization with which you are familiar, in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue.
Introduction
Note: Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.
Background and Context
As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.
Instructions
Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Overall, you will be assessed on the following criteria:
· Summarize your chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.
1. Reiterate your rationale for pursuing this issue, as well as the gap contributing to it that you identified in your previous assessment.
· Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.
2. Use at least one piece of evidence to support this disparity (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resources).
· Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.
3. For example, if your implementati.
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
HCS 451 Week 2 Assignment Quality Dimensions and Measures Table
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
HCS 451 Week 2 Assignment Quality Dimensions and Measures Table
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
HCS 451 Week 2 Assignment Quality Dimensions and Measures Table
For more course tutorials visit
www.hcs451.com
Most of the Assignments contains more than 1 Paper/PPT
HCS 451 Week 1 Assignment Continuous Quality Improvement Timeline (2 Sheet)
HCS 451 Week 2 Assignment Quality Dimensions and Measures Table
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
HCS 456 Effective Communication/tutorialrank.com
1. HCS 456 All Assignments
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
HCS 456 Week 1 Email to a Friend
HCS 456 Week 1 Risk Management Worksheet (New Syllabus)
HCS 456 Week 2 Enterprise Risk Management Paper
HCS 456 Week 3 Individual Organizational Performance Management
Table
HCS 456 Week 3 Organizational Performance Management Presentation
HCS 456 Week 3 Organizational Performance Management Paper
HCS 456 Week 4 Risk Management Tools and Decision-Making
Worksheet (New Syllabus)
2. HCS 456 Week 4 Tools and Decision Making for Ongoing Performance
Management Scenario Worksheet
HCS 456 Week 5 Risk Reporting and Adjustment Paper
HCS 456 Week 5 Benchmark Assignment Risk Management
Presentation
===============================================
HCS 456 Week 1 Email to a Friend
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
HCS 456 Week 1 Email to a Friend
Imagine that you have been emailing one of your friends who is
interested in pursuing her degree. She knows you are in a risk
management course, but does not know much about the topic. She has
asked if you could explain to her what risk management is.
3. Write a 750- to 1,050-word email in which you explain to your friend
what risk management is. Include the role of the risk manager.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
===============================================
HCS 456 Week 1 Risk Management Worksheet (New
Syllabus)
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Complete Parts A and B
Part A: Risk Management concepts
Complete the table below
Be clear and concise use complete sentences and use your own words.
Follow standard grammar rules and provide examples where appropriate
to support your answers.
Risk management concepts definition give and example of how the
concept is used within risk management in health care
4. Conditions of participation
Accident (medical)
Complaint
EMTALA
HIPAA
Incident reporting system
Informed consent
Mal practice
Legal Health record
National patient safety goals
Part B: Factor that influence Risk Management
Complete the table below
Be clear and concise use complete sentences and use your own words.
Follow standard grammar rules and provide examples where appropriate
to support your answers.
Identify 3 to 5 factors that influence risk management in health care
How does factor selected influence risk management in health care
5. ===============================================
HCS 456 Week 2 Enterprise Risk Management Paper
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
HCS 456 Week 2 Enterprise Risk Management Paper
Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper about enterprise risk management
(ERM).
Include the following in your paper:
• Explain the difference between traditional and enterprise risk
management.
• Explain why enterprise risk management is a more effective approach
for today's organizations.
• Explain key drivers of value-driven enterprise risk management.
Cite at least 3 outside sources.
Format your paper according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
===============================================
6. HCS 456 Week 3 Individual Organizational Performance
Management Table (New Syllabus)
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Organizational Performance Management Table
After you have completed your individual research on your chosen type
of health care organization, collaborate with your Learning Team to
complete this table. You will then refer to this table as you collaborate to
write your paper. Include this table as an appendix to your paper.
Fill in the necessary information in each cell, but be as succinct as
possible.
1. Provide names of or links to specific organizations. Summarize
key products or services provided by each type of organization and
identify the primary customers they serve.
2. Outline the overall content of the major regulations, accreditation
requirements, and other standards that affect each organization.
7. Provide the title, section, parts, or subparts or the numbering
system and so on of the specific regulations or accreditation
requirements.
For example: Use of electronic signatures in electronic medical records
is equivalent to handwritten signatures on paper; FDA regulation; Title
21 CFR Part 11, Subpart C, § 11.200Electronic
Signature: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrse
arch.cfm?cfrpart=11
3. Highlight the effect of each organization’s regulations,
accreditation requirements, and other standards on the risk-
management and quality-management functions and activities.
4. Specify components of performance-management systems—
policies and procedures, self-audits, benchmarking, complaint
management, corrective or preventive action, education and
training, communication, and other mechanisms—to be used by
each organization.
5. Provide links to any relevant sources that will be useful as your
Learning Team completes the paper.
===============================================
HCS 456 Week 3 Organizational Performance
Management Paper
8. For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
HCS 456 Week 3 Organizational Performance Management Paper
Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you:
Address the similarities and differences among the types of
organizations.
Propose how each organization will monitor performance, achieve
regulatory and accreditation compliance, and improve overall
organizational performance.
Describe ways each organization will communicate with
leadership to ensure alignment of organizational goals and gain
buy-in from staff to achieve compliance with the standards and
requirements issued by regulatory and accreditation bodies.
Determine how compliance with the regulations and development
of risk- and quality-management systems for each type of
organization contribute to the organization's overall performance-
management system.
Cite at least 4 sources, three from the University Library and one from
either the course textbooks or this week's Electronic Reserve Readings.
Prepare a list of all resources used in your research.
9. Include the Organizational Performance Management Table as an
appendix to the paper.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
===============================================
HCS 456 Week 3 Organizational Performance
Management Presentation (New Syllabus)
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Organizational Performance Management Paper
Instructions:
Resource: Organizational Management Performance Table
As a team, discuss and compare your chosen organizations selected in
this week's individual assignment, Organizational Management
Performance Table to complete this paper.
As a team, create a 8- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation
10. (not counting the title or reference slides) with detailed speaker notes of
at least 100 words per slide in which you compare and contrast the
organizations selected by each learning team member.
Include the following in your presentation:
• Identify the similarities and differences among the types of
organizations each team member selected.
• Propose how each organization will monitor performance, achieve
regulatory and accreditation compliance, and improve overall
organizational performance.
• Describe ways each organization will communicate with leadership
to ensure alignment of organizational goals and gain buy-in from staff to
achieve compliance with the standards and requirements issued by
Regulatory and accreditation bodies.
• Determine how compliance with the regulations and development of
risk- and quality-management systems for each type of organization
contribute to the organization's overall performance-management
system.
11. Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references and your
textbook to support your assignment.
Format your presentation according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
SupportingMaterial:Organizational Management Performance Table
===============================================
HCS 456 Week 4 Risk Management Tools and
DecisionMaking Worksheet (New Syllabus)
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Risk Management Tools and Decision-Making Worksheet
12. Complete the Risk Management Tools and Decision-Making worksheet.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
Risk Management Tools and Decision Making Worksheet
Complete Parts A and B.
Part A: Risk Management Tools
Complete the table below.
Risk Management Tool
Identify the tool and how it is used
Part B: Risk Management Decisions
Review scenarios below.
Scenario 1:
13. A patient arrives at the Emergency Department and is admitted for
increased pain with the source unknown. The on call physician asks the
intake staff, "What is the source of payment for the patient" in order to
assist with his decision to see the patient or not. The physician then
declines to see the patient based on the insurance status.
Scenario 2:
A patient is admitted to the medical floor in a health care facility. She is
confused and won't stay in her bed. The patient is placed in a room at the
end of the hall away from the nurse's station and she is not easily seen
by staff. The patient continues to get out of bed without using her call
light and eventually falls resulting in an injury.
Write a 75-150- word response to each of the following questions based
on the scenarios presented. Be clear and concise, use complete
sentences, and use your own words. Follow standard grammar rules and
provide examples where appropriate to support your answers.
1. What is the risk management issue presented in each scenario?
2. What do you propose to resolve the issues? Explain your answer.
3. What challenges do you foresee with the propose solutions?
14. Cite your sources below if applicable. For additional information on
how to properly cite your sources, log on to the Reference and Citation
Generator in the Center for Writing Excellence.
===============================================
HCS 456 Week 4 Tools and Decision Making for
Ongoing Performance Management Scenario Worksheet
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
HCS 456 Week 4 Tools and Decision Making for Ongoing Performance
Management Scenario Worksheet
Tools and Decision-Making for Ongoing Performance Management
Scenario Worksheet
Select one scenario that is most applicable to your chosen organization
from the Week Three assignment and complete the worksheet.
Part 1: Choose a Scenario
15. • ABC Organization has noticed an increase in patients who have
acquired infections while receiving care and service. In fact, there seems
to be so many types of infections that the organization does not know
where to start. With your guidance, the organization will be able to
identify infections and the number of infections per category throughout
the facility to determine the vital few and focus their efforts on the few
areas that will bring about the greatest return on investment of time and
effort. The organization needs to identify which infections affect the
most patients. Which tools would you use to make this decision?
• DEF Organization has received complaints from patients regarding the
delays they experienced when checking in for care or service at the front
desk to the time they are called to receive their services. The patients
commonly described the issues they experienced as a bottleneck. The
organization has determined that the admission process needs to be
reviewed and suggestions need to be made on ways to streamline the
process to more efficiently manage the flow of patients in the facility.
Which tools would you use to make decisions on streamlining the
process?
• The information technology department of GHI Organization recently
experienced a system outage that left staff in the organization unable to
access their primary billing software application for several hours.
Leaders in the organization noticed this disruption of workflow. They
wanted to know the contributing causes and the root causes of this
outage so systems could be implemented to ensure no future disruption.
16. With your knowledge of tools used for decision-making, which tools
would be most effective for addressing this situation?
• Leadership in JKL Organization has asked the following questions:
o Have our customer satisfaction scores improved over the past 2 years
since we implemented the rapid response teams?
o Are there any observable patterns or trends upward or downward?
Are there any high or low points?
Which tools would you use to answer these questions?
Part 2: Complete the following sections.
Support your answers with a minimum of 6 sources, 4 from the
University Library and 2 from either the course textbooks or this week’s
Electronic Reserve Readings. Prepare a list of all resources used in your
research in the References section.Information (Answer the following
questions in 25 to 50 words each.)
1. What kind of information do you need to respond to this scenario?
2. How and where can you acquire this information?
3. What processes should you use to gather this information?
17. Complete the following table. (Complete rows with 25 to 50 words
each.)
Tool What Kind of Information Will Each Tool Provide? Under What
Conditions is This Tool Most Applicable?
Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)
Flow chart
Cause and effect diagram
Check sheet
Control chart
Histogram
Pareto chart
Run chart
Scatter diagram
How do you determine which tool is most appropriate?
What are the most appropriate tools for responding to this scenario?
Response (Your answer should be 50 to 100 words.)
How will you respond to the scenario? Explain your reasoning.
Collaboration (Answer the following questions in 50 to 100 words each.)
1. How did your team come to an agreement about this scenario?
18. 2. What challenges did you encounter? How did you overcome these
challenges?
===============================================
HCS 456 Week 5 Benchmark Assignment Risk
Management Presentation
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
HCS 456 Week 5 Benchmark Assignment—Risk Management
Presentation
Imagine you work as a risk management supervisor at a local health care
facility. You have been asked by leadership to prepare a presentation for
the stakeholders on the importance of risk management.
Create a 10- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation (not
counting the title or reference slides) with detailed speaker notes of at
least 100 words per slide.
Include the following in your presentation:
• Explain the concepts of risk management in the health care industry.
• Explain factors that influence risk management in the health care
industry.
19. • Explain the relationship between risk management and quality
management.
• Analyze the information and information technology methods needed
to make risk-management decisions in the health care industry.
• Analyze key risk management tools in the health care industry.
• Analyze challenges in making risk management decisions.
Cite at least 4 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references.
Format your presentation according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
===============================================
HCS 456 Week 5 Risk Reporting and Adjustment Paper
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
HCS 456 Week 5 Risk Reporting and Adjustment Paper
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you:
20. • Contrast formal and informal methods for reporting adverse events in a
health care organization.
• Explain the role of risk adjustment in managing health care
organizations.
Include at least 2 outside sources.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
===============================================