Adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•8 views
This document provides instructions for an assignment analyzing an adverse event or near miss from a nursing experience. Students are asked to write a 5-7 page paper analyzing an event, including: the missed steps or protocol deviations that led to the event; implications for stakeholders; quality improvement technologies that could prevent recurrence; relevant metrics supporting the need for improvement; and a proposed quality improvement initiative. The analysis should be communicated professionally and logically, integrating at least 5 scholarly sources and using correct APA style formatting.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis
addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better
understand the performance levels relating to each grading criterion.ORDER NOW FOR
ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERSAnalyze the missed steps or protocol deviations
related to an adverse event or near miss.Describe how the event resulted from a patient’s
medical management rather than from the underlying condition.Identify and evaluate the
missed steps or protocol deviations leading to the event.Explain the extent to which the
incident was preventable.Research the impact of the same type of adverse event or near
miss in other facilities.Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all
stakeholders.Evaluate the short- and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family,
interprofessional team, facility, community). Analyze each stakeholder’s contribution to the
event.Analyze the interprofessional team’s responsibilities and actions. Explain what
measures each interprofessional team member should have taken to create a culture of
safety.Describe any change to process or protocol implemented after the incident.Evaluate
quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and
increase patient safety.Analyze the quality improvement technologies put in place to
increase patient safety and prevent recurrence of the near miss or adverse event.Determine
the appropriateness of the technology application for a specific patient or
situation.Research scholarly, evidence-based literature to learn how institutions can
integrate solutions to prevent similar events.Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse
event or near-miss incident to support need for improvement.Identify the salient data
associated with the adverse event or near miss that is generated from the facility’s
dashboard.Note: Dashboard means data generated from the information technology
platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for
health care management.Analyze what the relevant metrics show.Explain research or data
related to the adverse event or near miss that is available outside of your institution.
Compare internal data to external data. Use resources such as the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ),
Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), and the World Health Organization
(WHO).Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent the recurrence of an adverse
event or near miss.Explain, from an evidence-based viewpoint, how your facility now
manages or should manage the process or protocol.Evaluate how other institutions
addressed similar incidents or events.Analyze QI initiatives developed to prevent similar
incidents. Explain why they are successful. Provide evidence of their success.Propose
solutions for your selected institution that can be implemented to prevent similar future
adverse events or near-miss incidents.Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a
professional, effective manner, writing content clearly and logically, with correct use of
grammar, punctuation, and spelling.Integrate relevant sources to support arguments,
correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.Example Assessment: You may
use the Adverse Event or Near-Miss Analysis Exemplar [PDF] for an idea of what an
assessment receiving a proficient or higher evaluation would look like.Additional
RequirementsSubmission length: 5–7 typed, double-spaced pages.Font: Times New Roman,
12 points.Number of references: Cite a minimum of 5 current scholarly and/or authoritative]()
Recommended
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event o.docx
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.
This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a similar adverse event or near miss.
Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.
The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand .
Adverse Event or Analysis.docx
This document outlines an assignment to analyze a past adverse event or near miss from nursing experience. Students are asked to write a 5-7 page paper integrating research on the event to propose a quality improvement initiative. The analysis should evaluate missed steps, implications for stakeholders, appropriate safety technologies, relevant metrics, and propose an evidence-based initiative to prevent future incidents. Students must address all analysis points and communicate the analysis professionally using APA style citations and formatting.
Adverse Event And Analysis.docx
This document provides instructions for an assignment analyzing an adverse event or near miss from a nursing experience. Students are asked to write a 5-7 page paper integrating research on the event to propose a quality improvement initiative. The analysis should evaluate the causes of the event, implications for stakeholders, appropriate safety technologies, and metrics supporting the need for improvement. Based on this information, students should outline solutions to prevent similar future incidents. The analysis must address all criteria in the scoring guide and be communicated professionally using correct APA formatting for citations and references.
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or ne.docx
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.
This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a similar adverse event or near miss.
Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.
The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understa.
Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis.docx
This document provides instructions for a nursing student to write a 5-7 page analysis of an adverse event or near miss from their professional experience. The analysis should integrate research on the event and propose a quality improvement initiative. It outlines the competencies the analysis should demonstrate, including evaluating quality improvement technologies, analyzing implications for stakeholders, incorporating relevant metrics, and outlining an initiative to prevent future incidents. The student is asked to thoroughly describe the event, research its impacts, evaluate responses, and propose a new initiative to enhance patient safety.
Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis DetailsAt.docx
Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis
Details
Attempt 1Available
Attempt 2NotAvailable
Attempt 3NotAvailable
Toggle Drawer
Overview
Write a 5–7-page a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss from your professional nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization.
Health care organizations strive for a culture of safety. Yet despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, laws, legislation and regulations, medical errors continue to occur. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation.
Show More
Toggle Drawer
Context
The purpose of the report is to assess whether specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Nurses and other health professionals with specializations and/or interest in the condition, disease, or the selected issue are your target audience.
Toggle Drawer
Questions to Consider
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Show More
Toggle Drawer
Resources
Required Resources
MSN Program Journey
The following is a useful map that will guide you as you continue your MSN program. This map gives you an overview of all the steps required to prepare for your practicum and to complete your degree. It also outlines the support that will be available to you along the way.
MSN Program Journey
|
Transcript
.
Show More
Assessment Instructions
Preparation
Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization.
Note
: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.
The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be s.
Assessment InstructionsPreparationPrepare a comprehensiv.docx
Assessment Instructions
Preparation
Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization.
Note
: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.
The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Adverse Event or Near-miss Analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Describe how the event resulted from a patient’s medical management rather than from the underlying condition.
Identify and evaluate the missed steps or protocol deviations that led to the event.
Discuss the extent to which the incident was preventable.
Research the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Evaluate both short-term and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community). Analyze how it was managed and who was involved.
Analyze the responsibilities and actions of the interprofessional team. Explain what measures should have been taken and identify the responsible parties or roles.
Describe any change to process or protocol implemented after the incident.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the quality improvement technologies that were put in place to increase patient safety and prevent a repeat of similar events.
Determine whether the technologies are being utilized appropriately.
Explore how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Identify the salient data that is associated with the adverse event or near miss that is generated from the facility’s dashboard. (By dashboard, we mean the data that is generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management.)
Analyze what the relevant metrics show.
Explain research or data related to the adverse event or near miss that is available outside of your institution. Compare internal .
Strive for a culture of safety.docx
The document outlines an assignment to analyze an adverse event or near miss from nursing experience, research the event, and propose a quality improvement initiative. Students are instructed to:
1) Analyze the causes and preventability of the event by identifying missed steps or protocols.
2) Evaluate the short and long-term implications for stakeholders and responsibilities of those involved.
3) Assess quality improvement technologies in place and their appropriate use in preventing similar events.
4) Incorporate relevant metrics and data on the event from within and outside the organization to identify needs for improvement.
Recommended
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event o.docx
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.
This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a similar adverse event or near miss.
Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.
The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand .
Adverse Event or Analysis.docx
This document outlines an assignment to analyze a past adverse event or near miss from nursing experience. Students are asked to write a 5-7 page paper integrating research on the event to propose a quality improvement initiative. The analysis should evaluate missed steps, implications for stakeholders, appropriate safety technologies, relevant metrics, and propose an evidence-based initiative to prevent future incidents. Students must address all analysis points and communicate the analysis professionally using APA style citations and formatting.
Adverse Event And Analysis.docx
This document provides instructions for an assignment analyzing an adverse event or near miss from a nursing experience. Students are asked to write a 5-7 page paper integrating research on the event to propose a quality improvement initiative. The analysis should evaluate the causes of the event, implications for stakeholders, appropriate safety technologies, and metrics supporting the need for improvement. Based on this information, students should outline solutions to prevent similar future incidents. The analysis must address all criteria in the scoring guide and be communicated professionally using correct APA formatting for citations and references.
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or ne.docx
Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.
This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a similar adverse event or near miss.
Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.
The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understa.
Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis.docx
This document provides instructions for a nursing student to write a 5-7 page analysis of an adverse event or near miss from their professional experience. The analysis should integrate research on the event and propose a quality improvement initiative. It outlines the competencies the analysis should demonstrate, including evaluating quality improvement technologies, analyzing implications for stakeholders, incorporating relevant metrics, and outlining an initiative to prevent future incidents. The student is asked to thoroughly describe the event, research its impacts, evaluate responses, and propose a new initiative to enhance patient safety.
Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis DetailsAt.docx
Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis
Details
Attempt 1Available
Attempt 2NotAvailable
Attempt 3NotAvailable
Toggle Drawer
Overview
Write a 5–7-page a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss from your professional nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization.
Health care organizations strive for a culture of safety. Yet despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, laws, legislation and regulations, medical errors continue to occur. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation.
Show More
Toggle Drawer
Context
The purpose of the report is to assess whether specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Nurses and other health professionals with specializations and/or interest in the condition, disease, or the selected issue are your target audience.
Toggle Drawer
Questions to Consider
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Show More
Toggle Drawer
Resources
Required Resources
MSN Program Journey
The following is a useful map that will guide you as you continue your MSN program. This map gives you an overview of all the steps required to prepare for your practicum and to complete your degree. It also outlines the support that will be available to you along the way.
MSN Program Journey
|
Transcript
.
Show More
Assessment Instructions
Preparation
Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization.
Note
: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.
The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be s.
Assessment InstructionsPreparationPrepare a comprehensiv.docx
Assessment Instructions
Preparation
Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization.
Note
: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.
The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Adverse Event or Near-miss Analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion.
Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.
Describe how the event resulted from a patient’s medical management rather than from the underlying condition.
Identify and evaluate the missed steps or protocol deviations that led to the event.
Discuss the extent to which the incident was preventable.
Research the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities.
Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.
Evaluate both short-term and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community). Analyze how it was managed and who was involved.
Analyze the responsibilities and actions of the interprofessional team. Explain what measures should have been taken and identify the responsible parties or roles.
Describe any change to process or protocol implemented after the incident.
Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.
Analyze the quality improvement technologies that were put in place to increase patient safety and prevent a repeat of similar events.
Determine whether the technologies are being utilized appropriately.
Explore how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events.
Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.
Identify the salient data that is associated with the adverse event or near miss that is generated from the facility’s dashboard. (By dashboard, we mean the data that is generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management.)
Analyze what the relevant metrics show.
Explain research or data related to the adverse event or near miss that is available outside of your institution. Compare internal .
Strive for a culture of safety.docx
The document outlines an assignment to analyze an adverse event or near miss from nursing experience, research the event, and propose a quality improvement initiative. Students are instructed to:
1) Analyze the causes and preventability of the event by identifying missed steps or protocols.
2) Evaluate the short and long-term implications for stakeholders and responsibilities of those involved.
3) Assess quality improvement technologies in place and their appropriate use in preventing similar events.
4) Incorporate relevant metrics and data on the event from within and outside the organization to identify needs for improvement.
Adverse Event in Healthcare Analysis.docx
This document provides instructions for a 5-7 page analysis on an adverse event or near miss from a nursing experience. It outlines 15 criteria to address in the analysis, including:
1) Analyzing the missed steps or protocol deviations related to the event
2) Researching the impact of similar events in other facilities
3) Proposing a quality improvement initiative to prevent future events
The analysis should integrate research, propose solutions to prevent recurrence, and communicate findings professionally using APA style formatting. It will be evaluated based on comprehensively addressing the 15 outlined criteria.
Adverse Event from My Professional Nursing Experience.docx
1) A nurse experienced an adverse event during their professional nursing career where a patient's medical management led to an unintended outcome rather than their underlying condition.
2) The event was caused by missed steps and protocol deviations by the interprofessional team. It impacted stakeholders in both short-term and long-term ways.
3) To prevent similar events, the nurse proposes a quality improvement initiative for their organization that incorporates lessons learned from other institutions and utilizes relevant metrics and technologies to enhance patient safety.
Capella University Adverse Event in Healthcare Analysis.docx
This document provides an overview for an assignment to analyze an adverse event or near miss from a nursing experience and propose a quality improvement initiative. Students are instructed to write a 5-7 page paper comprehensively analyzing an event, integrating research, and proposing an initiative. They must analyze missed steps, impacts on stakeholders, responsibilities, data, metrics, and research to support evaluating current processes and outlining an initiative to prevent future events. The goal is to focus on patient safety and organizational vulnerabilities.
OverviewCreate a 5 page complete teaching plan, synthesizing pre.docx
Overview
Create a 5 page complete teaching plan, synthesizing previous work with an assessment plan for the course to create a cohesive whole.
Note: Assessments in this course build on each other and must be completed in sequential order.
Assessment is a key to teaching and learning. In this assessment, you will select meaningful ways to assess the teaching and learning in the course you have been designing, and will tie together each of the parts of your course design.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
· Competency 1: Appraise the influence of learner's culture, gender, and experiences on teaching and learning.
· Apply knowledge of methods of thinking, learning, and communicating to specific learning situations.
· Consider barriers to learning when designing and developing educational programs.
· Integrate cultural competence in nursing and healthcare educational offerings.
· Competency 2: Apply educational theory and evidence-based teaching practices when implementing teaching strategies.
· Apply appropriate theory to optimize the teaching experience and learner outcomes.
· Competency 3: Apply a variety of teaching strategies appropriate to diverse learner needs, content, and desired learner outcomes.
· Incorporate evidence-based best practices to enhance learner motivation in a selected learning environment and format.
· Integrate appropriate teaching strategies, techniques, and outcomes for nursing and healthcare education for use in specific situations and populations.
· Design appropriate and meaningful assessments for a course.
· Competency 4: Integrate best practices for classroom management.
· Integrate evidence-based best practices for classroom and learner management.
· Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations of a nursing education professional.
· Develop a teaching plan for a selected topic that demonstrates flow, cohesion, and application of best practices.
· Support identified position with effective written communication using appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting.
Assessment Instructions
Preparation
Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization.
Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.
The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill th ...
Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan.docx
This document provides instructions for conducting a root-cause analysis and creating a safety improvement plan for a quality or safety issue in a healthcare setting. Nurses can play a key role in performing root-cause analyses to identify underlying causes of problems and developing plans to prevent recurrences. The analysis should identify the root cause of a specific patient safety issue or sentinel event, while the safety improvement plan should apply evidence-based strategies to address the issue and leverage existing organizational resources.
PREPARATIONConsider the hospital-acquired conditions that ar.docx
PREPARATION
Consider the hospital-acquired conditions that are not reimbursed for under Medicare/Medicaid. Among these conditions are specific safety issues such as infections, falls, medication errors, and other safety concerns that could have been prevented or alleviated with the use of evidence-based guidelines. Hospital Safety Score, an independent nonprofit organization, uses national performance measures to determine the safety score for hospitals in the United States. The Hospital Safety Score Web site and other online resources provide hospital safety scores to the public.
Read the scenario below:
Scenario
As the manager of a unit, you have been advised by the patient safety office of an alarming increase in the hospital safety score for your unit. This is a very serious public relations matter because patient safety data is public information. It is also a financial crisis because the organization stands to lose a significant amount of reimbursement money from Medicare and Medicaid unless the source of the problem can be identified and corrected. You are required to submit a safety score improvement plan to the organization's leadership and the patient safety office.
Select a specific patient safety goal that has been identified by an organization, or one that is widely regarded in the nursing profession as relevant to quality patient care delivery, such as patient falls, infection rates, catheter-induced urinary infections, IV infections, et cetera.
DELIVERABLE: SAFETY SCORE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Develop a 3–5 page safety score improvement plan.
Identify the health care setting and nursing unit of your choice
in the title of the mitigation plan. For example, "Safety Score Improvement Plan for XYZ Rehabilitation Center."
You may choose to use information on a patient safety issue for the organization in which you currently work, or search for information from a setting you are familiar with, perhaps from your clinical work.
Demonstrate systems theory and systems thinking as you develop your recommendations.
Organize your report with these headings:
Study of Factors
Identify a patient safety issue.
Describe the influence of nursing leadership in driving the needed changes.
Apply systems thinking to explain how current policies and procedures may affect a safety issue.
Recommendations
Recommend an evidence-based strategy to improve the safety issue.
Explain a strategy to collect information about the safety concern.
How would you determine the sources of the problem?
Explain a plan to implement a recommendation and monitor outcomes.
What quality indicators will you use?
How will you monitor outcomes?
Will policies or procedures need to be changed?
Will nursing staff need training?
What tools will you need to do this?
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and in-te ...
Outcome Measures Issues Opportunities in Healthcare Organizations.docx
The document provides guidance for a 6-page report on outcome measures, issues, and opportunities in healthcare organizations. It outlines competencies the report should demonstrate, such as analyzing quality outcomes from an administrative perspective and determining how organizational functions affect measures. The report should identify relevant outcomes and measures, performance issues, and a strategy for change using a model. Resources are provided on quality improvement, measures, and writing.
Prevent Similar Future Adverse.docx
Medical errors continue to occur despite efforts to improve patient safety. Many errors stem from ineffective communication between healthcare professionals. To prevent future issues, healthcare organizations must thoroughly analyze adverse events and near misses. This includes identifying contributing factors, evaluating processes and protocols, assessing stakeholder impacts, researching best practices, and developing quality improvement initiatives. Comprehensive reviews that involve all stakeholders can help organizations implement targeted solutions and new technologies to establish a strong culture of safety.
Write a report on the application of population health improve.docx
Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario.
In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.
Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.
Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Competency Map
Use this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
Questions to ConsiderAs you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Recall an instance in which you have taken a strategy, finding, or lesson learned from one care context and applied it in another.
What challenges did this type of knowledge transfer present?
Did applying this knowledge in a different setting lead to improvemen.
Safety Score Improvement Plan Scoring Guide Grading RubricCr.docx
Safety Score Improvement Plan Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished
Identify a patient safety issue. Does not identify a patient safety
issue.
Identifies patient safety concerns in general,
but does not identify a specific issue.
Identifies a patient safety issue. Identifies a patient safety issue and explains why the
issue is a primary concern for nursing.
Describe the influence of nursing
leadership in driving needed changes.
Does not describe the influence of
nursing leadership in driving the
needed changes.
Describes the influence of nursing leadership in
general terms but does not describe how
nursing leadership can drive change.
Describes the influence of
nursing leadership in driving the
needed changes.
Describes the influence of nursing leadership as a
driving force for changes that affect patient safety
and quality outcomes, and provides a specific
example of driving a needed change.
Apply systems thinking to explain how
current policies and procedures may
affect a safety issue.
Does not apply systems thinking to
explain how current policies and
procedures may affect a safety
issue.
Identifies leadership and structure responsible
for current policies and procedures, but does
not apply systems thinking to explain the
connection to patient safety.
Applies systems thinking to
explain how current policies and
procedures may affect a safety
issue.
Applies systems thinking to explain how current
policies and procedures may affect a safety issue,
and includes a discussion of how staff could monitor
systems and implement safeguards.
Explain a strategy to collect
information about the safety concern.
Does not explain a strategy to
collect information about the safety
concern.
Identifies several strategies to collect
information about the safety concern, but does
not explain one strategy.
Explains a strategy to collect
information about the safety
concern.
Explains a strategy to collect information about the
safety concern and how it could be implemented,
and identifies possible obstacles to obtaining
information.
Recommend an evidence-based strategy
to improve the safety issue.
Does not recommend an evidence-
based strategy to improve the
safety issue.
Describes strategies for improving a safety
issue, but does not indicate if it is evidence
based.
Recommends an evidence-based
strategy to improve the safety
issue.
Recommends an evidence-based strategy to improve
the safety issue, and identifies potential limitations
of the strategy.
Explain a plan to implement a
recommendation and monitor
outcomes.
Does not explain a plan to
implement a recommendation and
monitor outcomes.
Makes a recommendation, but does not explain
how it will be implemented.
Explains a plan to implement a
recommendation and monitor
outcomes.
Explains a plan to implement a recommendation and
monitor outcomes, and specifies quality indicators
and.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of.docx
Despite efforts to improve patient safety, medical errors continue to occur. Some errors result in minor issues, while others can permanently alter or end a patient's life. Many errors stem from ineffective communication between caregivers. This document discusses analyzing a medical error or near miss to identify contributing factors, preventability, stakeholder impacts, team responsibilities, quality improvement measures taken, and proposed additional solutions to prevent similar incidents.
Write an analysis, 4–5 pages in length, of the gap between curre.docx
Write an analysis, 4–5 pages in length, of the gap between current and desired performance, with respect to the provision of safe, high-quality patient care.
Note:
Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
As a nurse leader, you must be able to assess your organization's ability to deliver safe, high-quality patient care. In so doing, you may be required to perform a gap analysis of a quality or safety issue as the first step in improving outcomes. Failure to meet benchmarks for safe and effective patient care can have reimbursement, regulatory, and legal consequences.
This assessment provides an opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to successfully implement changes that improve patient outcomes by:
Evaluating the current culture of an organization.
Performing an outcomes gap analysis.
Determining what changes are needed to bridge the gap.
Examining current thinking on this topic contained in the literature.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze quality and safety outcomes from an administrative and systems perspective.
Identify a systemic problem in an organization related to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
Propose specific practice changes within an organization that will improve quality and safety outcomes and bridge the gap between current and desired performance.
Prioritize proposed practice changes.
Competency 2: Determine how outcome measures promote quality and safety processes within an organization
Determine how proposed practice changes will foster a culture of quality and safety.
Competency 3: Determine how specific organizational functions, policies, processes, procedures, norms, and behaviors can be used to build reliable and high-performing organizations.
Determine how a particular organizational culture or hierarchy might affect or contribute to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
Justify necessary changes to particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors that correct or mitigate adverse quality and safety outcomes.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Communicate analysis data and information clearly and accurately, using correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Context
Quality and safety are everyone's responsibility as a team of interprofessional care delivery partners. Together we develop policies that support quality and safe care delivery. As part of the interprofessional team.
Data Analysis And Quality Improvement Essay 2.pdf
The document provides instructions for an assignment to develop an 8-10 page quality improvement initiative proposal based on analyzing health care data. It includes:
1) Gathering internal and external benchmark data on a selected health issue and analyzing dashboards to identify areas for improvement.
2) Making evidence-based recommendations to improve outcomes related to the issue while considering challenges to meeting benchmarks.
3) Developing communication strategies to engage the interprofessional team and promote the initiative's success through improved strategies.
Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal.docx
This document provides instructions for developing an 8-10 page quality improvement initiative proposal. It involves analyzing internal and external data to identify an area for improvement, developing evidence-based recommendations, and creating communication strategies to gain support from interprofessional team members. Key aspects include measuring outcomes, validating data, focusing on best practices, and using health informatics and technologies to enhance patient outcomes through quality improvement initiatives.
Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-.docx
Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of a selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing.
Before you begin to develop the assessment you are encouraged to complete the Annotated Bibliography Formative Assessment. Completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment and counts towards course engagement.
Rapid changes in information technology go hand-in-hand with progress in quality health care delivery, nursing practice, and interdisciplinary team collaboration. The following are only a few examples of how the health care field uses technology to provide care to patients across multiple settings:
Patient monitoring devices.
Robotics.
Electronic medical records.
Data management resources.
Ready access to current science.
Technology is essential to the advancement of the nursing profession, maintaining quality care outcomes, patient safety, and research.
This assessment will give you the opportunity to deepen your knowledge of how technology can enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. You will prepare an annotated bibliography on technology in nursing. A well-prepared annotated bibliography is a comprehensive commentary on the content of scholarly publications and other sources of evidence about a selected nursing-related technology. A bibliography of this type provides a vehicle for workplace discussion to address gaps in nursing practice and to improve patient care outcomes. As nurses become more accountable in their practice, they are being called upon to expand their role of caregiver and advocate to include fostering research and scholarship to advance nursing practice. An annotated bibliography stimulates innovative thinking to find solutions and approaches to effectively and efficiently address these issues.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired outcomes.
Analyze current evidence on the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team.
Integrate current evidence about the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation.
Competency 4: Recommend the use of a technology to enhance quality and safety standards for patients.
Describe organizational factors influencing the selection of a technology in the health care setting.
Justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in a health care setting.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.
Create a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated bibliography that is .
Implementing Quality Initiatives in Healthcare Organizations.docx
The document discusses implementing quality initiatives in healthcare organizations and provides instructions for an assessment on analyzing an existing quality improvement initiative. Students are asked to evaluate a QI initiative at their workplace related to a disease, condition, or public health issue. They must analyze the initiative's benchmarks and outcomes, incorporate perspectives from interprofessional team members, and recommend improvements. The analysis should be 5-7 pages long, cite at least 4 scholarly sources, and follow APA style guidelines.
Assessment Annotated Bibliography on Technology in Nursing.docx
This document provides instructions for Assessment 3, which requires students to write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography on a selected healthcare technology. Students must choose a direct or indirect patient care technology, conduct research using library databases, and select 4 peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years. For each source, students must write an annotation that summarizes the article, discusses the technology's impact on patient safety/quality of care, and relevance to nursing practice. The conclusion must tie together the sources and justify implementing the technology based on organizational factors and its impact. Strict formatting guidelines regarding length, references, font, and APA style must be followed.
Digital Clinical Documentation.docx
This document provides instructions for an annotated bibliography assignment on digital clinical documentation in nursing. Students are asked to:
1) Select a patient care technology topic of interest and research it, finding 4 relevant sources published within the last 5 years.
2) Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography summarizing each source and justifying how the technology could enhance quality and safety.
3) Consider how the technology impacts outcomes, organizational factors for selection, and how it could be implemented in healthcare settings.
The assignment aims to demonstrate competencies in evaluating technologies, making recommendations, and communicating scholarship.
Utilizing research software can be daunting for a What.docx
Utilizing research software can be intimidating for novices but deciding what software to use involves considering the type of research (qualitative vs. quantitative) and embedding course concepts and citations. The document discusses choosing research software and the differences between qualitative and quantitative types while citing sources.
To Prepare Reflect on your own community and consider the.docx
This document discusses economic trends in a small town in Mississippi. It notes that the town has major employers like warehouses, stores, and restaurants. It also has a mixture of housing, schools, and people of all races. The community has both urban and economic diversity.
Watch this video about Joseph concept of Creative.docx
The document discusses Joseph Schumpeter's concept of creative destruction and how new technologies can disrupt existing industries. Specifically, it mentions how self-driving cars may disrupt the job market for drivers. Students are instructed to write a paper on this topic using at least three sources from the Danforth Library databases, including three direct quotes from these sources cited in APA format.
write a 700 word psychoanalytic criticism research about the.docx
The document provides instructions for writing a 700-word psychoanalytic criticism essay about Edgar Allan Poe's short story "The Tell-Tale Heart". It outlines that the essay should include an introductory paragraph with a thesis statement, multiple body paragraphs with topic sentences and supporting details, and a concluding paragraph. It also provides guidance on formatting quotations and citations, including providing examples of how to cite sources in-text and create a works cited page.
More Related Content
Similar to Adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience.docx
Adverse Event in Healthcare Analysis.docx
This document provides instructions for a 5-7 page analysis on an adverse event or near miss from a nursing experience. It outlines 15 criteria to address in the analysis, including:
1) Analyzing the missed steps or protocol deviations related to the event
2) Researching the impact of similar events in other facilities
3) Proposing a quality improvement initiative to prevent future events
The analysis should integrate research, propose solutions to prevent recurrence, and communicate findings professionally using APA style formatting. It will be evaluated based on comprehensively addressing the 15 outlined criteria.
Adverse Event from My Professional Nursing Experience.docx
1) A nurse experienced an adverse event during their professional nursing career where a patient's medical management led to an unintended outcome rather than their underlying condition.
2) The event was caused by missed steps and protocol deviations by the interprofessional team. It impacted stakeholders in both short-term and long-term ways.
3) To prevent similar events, the nurse proposes a quality improvement initiative for their organization that incorporates lessons learned from other institutions and utilizes relevant metrics and technologies to enhance patient safety.
Capella University Adverse Event in Healthcare Analysis.docx
This document provides an overview for an assignment to analyze an adverse event or near miss from a nursing experience and propose a quality improvement initiative. Students are instructed to write a 5-7 page paper comprehensively analyzing an event, integrating research, and proposing an initiative. They must analyze missed steps, impacts on stakeholders, responsibilities, data, metrics, and research to support evaluating current processes and outlining an initiative to prevent future events. The goal is to focus on patient safety and organizational vulnerabilities.
OverviewCreate a 5 page complete teaching plan, synthesizing pre.docx
Overview
Create a 5 page complete teaching plan, synthesizing previous work with an assessment plan for the course to create a cohesive whole.
Note: Assessments in this course build on each other and must be completed in sequential order.
Assessment is a key to teaching and learning. In this assessment, you will select meaningful ways to assess the teaching and learning in the course you have been designing, and will tie together each of the parts of your course design.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
· Competency 1: Appraise the influence of learner's culture, gender, and experiences on teaching and learning.
· Apply knowledge of methods of thinking, learning, and communicating to specific learning situations.
· Consider barriers to learning when designing and developing educational programs.
· Integrate cultural competence in nursing and healthcare educational offerings.
· Competency 2: Apply educational theory and evidence-based teaching practices when implementing teaching strategies.
· Apply appropriate theory to optimize the teaching experience and learner outcomes.
· Competency 3: Apply a variety of teaching strategies appropriate to diverse learner needs, content, and desired learner outcomes.
· Incorporate evidence-based best practices to enhance learner motivation in a selected learning environment and format.
· Integrate appropriate teaching strategies, techniques, and outcomes for nursing and healthcare education for use in specific situations and populations.
· Design appropriate and meaningful assessments for a course.
· Competency 4: Integrate best practices for classroom management.
· Integrate evidence-based best practices for classroom and learner management.
· Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations of a nursing education professional.
· Develop a teaching plan for a selected topic that demonstrates flow, cohesion, and application of best practices.
· Support identified position with effective written communication using appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting.
Assessment Instructions
Preparation
Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization.
Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.
The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill th ...
Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan.docx
This document provides instructions for conducting a root-cause analysis and creating a safety improvement plan for a quality or safety issue in a healthcare setting. Nurses can play a key role in performing root-cause analyses to identify underlying causes of problems and developing plans to prevent recurrences. The analysis should identify the root cause of a specific patient safety issue or sentinel event, while the safety improvement plan should apply evidence-based strategies to address the issue and leverage existing organizational resources.
PREPARATIONConsider the hospital-acquired conditions that ar.docx
PREPARATION
Consider the hospital-acquired conditions that are not reimbursed for under Medicare/Medicaid. Among these conditions are specific safety issues such as infections, falls, medication errors, and other safety concerns that could have been prevented or alleviated with the use of evidence-based guidelines. Hospital Safety Score, an independent nonprofit organization, uses national performance measures to determine the safety score for hospitals in the United States. The Hospital Safety Score Web site and other online resources provide hospital safety scores to the public.
Read the scenario below:
Scenario
As the manager of a unit, you have been advised by the patient safety office of an alarming increase in the hospital safety score for your unit. This is a very serious public relations matter because patient safety data is public information. It is also a financial crisis because the organization stands to lose a significant amount of reimbursement money from Medicare and Medicaid unless the source of the problem can be identified and corrected. You are required to submit a safety score improvement plan to the organization's leadership and the patient safety office.
Select a specific patient safety goal that has been identified by an organization, or one that is widely regarded in the nursing profession as relevant to quality patient care delivery, such as patient falls, infection rates, catheter-induced urinary infections, IV infections, et cetera.
DELIVERABLE: SAFETY SCORE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Develop a 3–5 page safety score improvement plan.
Identify the health care setting and nursing unit of your choice
in the title of the mitigation plan. For example, "Safety Score Improvement Plan for XYZ Rehabilitation Center."
You may choose to use information on a patient safety issue for the organization in which you currently work, or search for information from a setting you are familiar with, perhaps from your clinical work.
Demonstrate systems theory and systems thinking as you develop your recommendations.
Organize your report with these headings:
Study of Factors
Identify a patient safety issue.
Describe the influence of nursing leadership in driving the needed changes.
Apply systems thinking to explain how current policies and procedures may affect a safety issue.
Recommendations
Recommend an evidence-based strategy to improve the safety issue.
Explain a strategy to collect information about the safety concern.
How would you determine the sources of the problem?
Explain a plan to implement a recommendation and monitor outcomes.
What quality indicators will you use?
How will you monitor outcomes?
Will policies or procedures need to be changed?
Will nursing staff need training?
What tools will you need to do this?
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and in-te ...
Outcome Measures Issues Opportunities in Healthcare Organizations.docx
The document provides guidance for a 6-page report on outcome measures, issues, and opportunities in healthcare organizations. It outlines competencies the report should demonstrate, such as analyzing quality outcomes from an administrative perspective and determining how organizational functions affect measures. The report should identify relevant outcomes and measures, performance issues, and a strategy for change using a model. Resources are provided on quality improvement, measures, and writing.
Prevent Similar Future Adverse.docx
Medical errors continue to occur despite efforts to improve patient safety. Many errors stem from ineffective communication between healthcare professionals. To prevent future issues, healthcare organizations must thoroughly analyze adverse events and near misses. This includes identifying contributing factors, evaluating processes and protocols, assessing stakeholder impacts, researching best practices, and developing quality improvement initiatives. Comprehensive reviews that involve all stakeholders can help organizations implement targeted solutions and new technologies to establish a strong culture of safety.
Write a report on the application of population health improve.docx
Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario.
In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.
Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.
Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Competency Map
Use this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
Questions to ConsiderAs you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Recall an instance in which you have taken a strategy, finding, or lesson learned from one care context and applied it in another.
What challenges did this type of knowledge transfer present?
Did applying this knowledge in a different setting lead to improvemen.
Safety Score Improvement Plan Scoring Guide Grading RubricCr.docx
Safety Score Improvement Plan Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished
Identify a patient safety issue. Does not identify a patient safety
issue.
Identifies patient safety concerns in general,
but does not identify a specific issue.
Identifies a patient safety issue. Identifies a patient safety issue and explains why the
issue is a primary concern for nursing.
Describe the influence of nursing
leadership in driving needed changes.
Does not describe the influence of
nursing leadership in driving the
needed changes.
Describes the influence of nursing leadership in
general terms but does not describe how
nursing leadership can drive change.
Describes the influence of
nursing leadership in driving the
needed changes.
Describes the influence of nursing leadership as a
driving force for changes that affect patient safety
and quality outcomes, and provides a specific
example of driving a needed change.
Apply systems thinking to explain how
current policies and procedures may
affect a safety issue.
Does not apply systems thinking to
explain how current policies and
procedures may affect a safety
issue.
Identifies leadership and structure responsible
for current policies and procedures, but does
not apply systems thinking to explain the
connection to patient safety.
Applies systems thinking to
explain how current policies and
procedures may affect a safety
issue.
Applies systems thinking to explain how current
policies and procedures may affect a safety issue,
and includes a discussion of how staff could monitor
systems and implement safeguards.
Explain a strategy to collect
information about the safety concern.
Does not explain a strategy to
collect information about the safety
concern.
Identifies several strategies to collect
information about the safety concern, but does
not explain one strategy.
Explains a strategy to collect
information about the safety
concern.
Explains a strategy to collect information about the
safety concern and how it could be implemented,
and identifies possible obstacles to obtaining
information.
Recommend an evidence-based strategy
to improve the safety issue.
Does not recommend an evidence-
based strategy to improve the
safety issue.
Describes strategies for improving a safety
issue, but does not indicate if it is evidence
based.
Recommends an evidence-based
strategy to improve the safety
issue.
Recommends an evidence-based strategy to improve
the safety issue, and identifies potential limitations
of the strategy.
Explain a plan to implement a
recommendation and monitor
outcomes.
Does not explain a plan to
implement a recommendation and
monitor outcomes.
Makes a recommendation, but does not explain
how it will be implemented.
Explains a plan to implement a
recommendation and monitor
outcomes.
Explains a plan to implement a recommendation and
monitor outcomes, and specifies quality indicators
and.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of.docx
Despite efforts to improve patient safety, medical errors continue to occur. Some errors result in minor issues, while others can permanently alter or end a patient's life. Many errors stem from ineffective communication between caregivers. This document discusses analyzing a medical error or near miss to identify contributing factors, preventability, stakeholder impacts, team responsibilities, quality improvement measures taken, and proposed additional solutions to prevent similar incidents.
Write an analysis, 4–5 pages in length, of the gap between curre.docx
Write an analysis, 4–5 pages in length, of the gap between current and desired performance, with respect to the provision of safe, high-quality patient care.
Note:
Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
As a nurse leader, you must be able to assess your organization's ability to deliver safe, high-quality patient care. In so doing, you may be required to perform a gap analysis of a quality or safety issue as the first step in improving outcomes. Failure to meet benchmarks for safe and effective patient care can have reimbursement, regulatory, and legal consequences.
This assessment provides an opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to successfully implement changes that improve patient outcomes by:
Evaluating the current culture of an organization.
Performing an outcomes gap analysis.
Determining what changes are needed to bridge the gap.
Examining current thinking on this topic contained in the literature.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze quality and safety outcomes from an administrative and systems perspective.
Identify a systemic problem in an organization related to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
Propose specific practice changes within an organization that will improve quality and safety outcomes and bridge the gap between current and desired performance.
Prioritize proposed practice changes.
Competency 2: Determine how outcome measures promote quality and safety processes within an organization
Determine how proposed practice changes will foster a culture of quality and safety.
Competency 3: Determine how specific organizational functions, policies, processes, procedures, norms, and behaviors can be used to build reliable and high-performing organizations.
Determine how a particular organizational culture or hierarchy might affect or contribute to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
Justify necessary changes to particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors that correct or mitigate adverse quality and safety outcomes.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Communicate analysis data and information clearly and accurately, using correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Context
Quality and safety are everyone's responsibility as a team of interprofessional care delivery partners. Together we develop policies that support quality and safe care delivery. As part of the interprofessional team.
Data Analysis And Quality Improvement Essay 2.pdf
The document provides instructions for an assignment to develop an 8-10 page quality improvement initiative proposal based on analyzing health care data. It includes:
1) Gathering internal and external benchmark data on a selected health issue and analyzing dashboards to identify areas for improvement.
2) Making evidence-based recommendations to improve outcomes related to the issue while considering challenges to meeting benchmarks.
3) Developing communication strategies to engage the interprofessional team and promote the initiative's success through improved strategies.
Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal.docx
This document provides instructions for developing an 8-10 page quality improvement initiative proposal. It involves analyzing internal and external data to identify an area for improvement, developing evidence-based recommendations, and creating communication strategies to gain support from interprofessional team members. Key aspects include measuring outcomes, validating data, focusing on best practices, and using health informatics and technologies to enhance patient outcomes through quality improvement initiatives.
Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-.docx
Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of a selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing.
Before you begin to develop the assessment you are encouraged to complete the Annotated Bibliography Formative Assessment. Completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment and counts towards course engagement.
Rapid changes in information technology go hand-in-hand with progress in quality health care delivery, nursing practice, and interdisciplinary team collaboration. The following are only a few examples of how the health care field uses technology to provide care to patients across multiple settings:
Patient monitoring devices.
Robotics.
Electronic medical records.
Data management resources.
Ready access to current science.
Technology is essential to the advancement of the nursing profession, maintaining quality care outcomes, patient safety, and research.
This assessment will give you the opportunity to deepen your knowledge of how technology can enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. You will prepare an annotated bibliography on technology in nursing. A well-prepared annotated bibliography is a comprehensive commentary on the content of scholarly publications and other sources of evidence about a selected nursing-related technology. A bibliography of this type provides a vehicle for workplace discussion to address gaps in nursing practice and to improve patient care outcomes. As nurses become more accountable in their practice, they are being called upon to expand their role of caregiver and advocate to include fostering research and scholarship to advance nursing practice. An annotated bibliography stimulates innovative thinking to find solutions and approaches to effectively and efficiently address these issues.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired outcomes.
Analyze current evidence on the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team.
Integrate current evidence about the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation.
Competency 4: Recommend the use of a technology to enhance quality and safety standards for patients.
Describe organizational factors influencing the selection of a technology in the health care setting.
Justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in a health care setting.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.
Create a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated bibliography that is .
Implementing Quality Initiatives in Healthcare Organizations.docx
The document discusses implementing quality initiatives in healthcare organizations and provides instructions for an assessment on analyzing an existing quality improvement initiative. Students are asked to evaluate a QI initiative at their workplace related to a disease, condition, or public health issue. They must analyze the initiative's benchmarks and outcomes, incorporate perspectives from interprofessional team members, and recommend improvements. The analysis should be 5-7 pages long, cite at least 4 scholarly sources, and follow APA style guidelines.
Assessment Annotated Bibliography on Technology in Nursing.docx
This document provides instructions for Assessment 3, which requires students to write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography on a selected healthcare technology. Students must choose a direct or indirect patient care technology, conduct research using library databases, and select 4 peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years. For each source, students must write an annotation that summarizes the article, discusses the technology's impact on patient safety/quality of care, and relevance to nursing practice. The conclusion must tie together the sources and justify implementing the technology based on organizational factors and its impact. Strict formatting guidelines regarding length, references, font, and APA style must be followed.
Digital Clinical Documentation.docx
This document provides instructions for an annotated bibliography assignment on digital clinical documentation in nursing. Students are asked to:
1) Select a patient care technology topic of interest and research it, finding 4 relevant sources published within the last 5 years.
2) Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography summarizing each source and justifying how the technology could enhance quality and safety.
3) Consider how the technology impacts outcomes, organizational factors for selection, and how it could be implemented in healthcare settings.
The assignment aims to demonstrate competencies in evaluating technologies, making recommendations, and communicating scholarship.
Similar to Adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience.docx (18)
Adverse Event from My Professional Nursing Experience.docx
Adverse Event from My Professional Nursing Experience.docx
Capella University Adverse Event in Healthcare Analysis.docx
Capella University Adverse Event in Healthcare Analysis.docx
OverviewCreate a 5 page complete teaching plan, synthesizing pre.docx
OverviewCreate a 5 page complete teaching plan, synthesizing pre.docx
PREPARATIONConsider the hospital-acquired conditions that ar.docx
PREPARATIONConsider the hospital-acquired conditions that ar.docx
Outcome Measures Issues Opportunities in Healthcare Organizations.docx
Outcome Measures Issues Opportunities in Healthcare Organizations.docx
Write a report on the application of population health improve.docx
Write a report on the application of population health improve.docx
Safety Score Improvement Plan Scoring Guide Grading RubricCr.docx
Safety Score Improvement Plan Scoring Guide Grading RubricCr.docx
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of.docx
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of.docx
Write an analysis, 4–5 pages in length, of the gap between curre.docx
Write an analysis, 4–5 pages in length, of the gap between curre.docx
Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal.docx
Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal.docx
Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-.docx
Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-.docx
Implementing Quality Initiatives in Healthcare Organizations.docx
Implementing Quality Initiatives in Healthcare Organizations.docx
Assessment Annotated Bibliography on Technology in Nursing.docx
Assessment Annotated Bibliography on Technology in Nursing.docx
More from write22
Utilizing research software can be daunting for a What.docx
Utilizing research software can be intimidating for novices but deciding what software to use involves considering the type of research (qualitative vs. quantitative) and embedding course concepts and citations. The document discusses choosing research software and the differences between qualitative and quantitative types while citing sources.
To Prepare Reflect on your own community and consider the.docx
This document discusses economic trends in a small town in Mississippi. It notes that the town has major employers like warehouses, stores, and restaurants. It also has a mixture of housing, schools, and people of all races. The community has both urban and economic diversity.
Watch this video about Joseph concept of Creative.docx
The document discusses Joseph Schumpeter's concept of creative destruction and how new technologies can disrupt existing industries. Specifically, it mentions how self-driving cars may disrupt the job market for drivers. Students are instructed to write a paper on this topic using at least three sources from the Danforth Library databases, including three direct quotes from these sources cited in APA format.
write a 700 word psychoanalytic criticism research about the.docx
The document provides instructions for writing a 700-word psychoanalytic criticism essay about Edgar Allan Poe's short story "The Tell-Tale Heart". It outlines that the essay should include an introductory paragraph with a thesis statement, multiple body paragraphs with topic sentences and supporting details, and a concluding paragraph. It also provides guidance on formatting quotations and citations, including providing examples of how to cite sources in-text and create a works cited page.
You have had the opportunity to review thermoregulation as is.docx
Thermoregulation is the process by which the human body regulates its internal temperature. Students were asked to post by midweek explaining what thermoregulation is and why it is important, and to respond to at least two other students' posts with details demonstrating understanding of the concepts and critical thinking. Posts were required to follow proper writing mechanics including language, tone, grammar and punctuation, and include citations for any outside sources.
Write 300 words in MLA Nietzsche claims God.docx
Nietzsche argues that God is dead and proposes two types of nihilism: active and passive. He considers his own philosophy to be actively life-affirming nihilism, whereas passive nihilism merely negates without proposing an alternative. Nietzsche is critical of religion, believing that the death of God as a metaphysical concept has led to a loss of meaning in modern society.
Write 300 words in MLA choose one topic.docx
This document provides two topic options for a 300 word essay in MLA format. The first option asks the writer to discuss the difference between John Locke's view of private property as a natural right and Karl Marx's view (aligned with Rousseau) that private property is the root of exploitation. The second option asks the writer to explain how Simone de Beauvoir revolutionized feminism with her statement "One is not born, but rather becomes Woman" and how she used existentialist principles to discuss women as the second sex.
Week 9 Assignment 2 Case Total Quality.docx
- Dr. Jones has implemented a Total Quality Management (TQM) team at the ESKCC medical clinic to examine processes and address increased patient complaints.
- The TQM team is presented with monthly complaint data showing the most common complaints are related to quality of service, wait times, and follow-up care availability.
- The current patient process involves registering at the front desk, seeing a nurse for exams/tests in an examination room if available, seeing the physician, and paying at the front desk before leaving.
What were American and British strategies for winning the.docx
The document asks several questions about strategies and challenges facing America and Britain during the Revolutionary War, the political philosophies of the Federalists and Antifederalists, key events and documents in early American history like the Whiskey Rebellion and Common Sense, and the emergence of political parties during Washington's presidency. It seeks concise explanations of the chief military and logistical issues confronting both sides in the war, the underlying principles of the Federalist and Antifederalist positions, and how formative incidents reflected the ongoing debate between strong central government and states' rights.
What is the process involving movement of mantle rock that.docx
Convection currents in the mantle cause rock to slowly rise and fall, controlled by gravity. Undulation or waves in stratified rocks of Earth's crust are folds in layered rock formations. A fracture or zone of fractures between blocks of rock that allows movement is called a fault.
Unit Learning Outcomes ULO Explain job and.docx
This document outlines unit learning outcomes for a course. It explains that students will learn about job rotation, coaching, and mentoring and how these help with employee development. Students will also evaluate and synthesize scholarly research to complete assignments, such as a 2-3 page APA formatted report answering questions about a case study on Market Research Inc.
Timeline of events what was happening that was important.docx
The document provides a timeline of important events and influences on fashion from 1800-1899. During this period, several major political and industrial developments helped shape fashion trends. The Empire and Romantic eras saw the rise of Napoleon in France and the Industrial Revolution in England. In the late 19th century, the Victorian era was characterized by Queen Victoria's rule in Britain, the American Civil War, and the growth of industrialization globally. Major fashion influences included Napoleon and his wife Josephine, Beau Brummel, and Charles Frederick Worth. Silhouettes for both men's and women's fashion evolved dramatically over the century from the Empire waistline to bustles and crinolines under Victoria. New technologies also industrialized textile production
To what degree did the emergence of a large union.docx
This document examines the relationship between the emergence of large unions in the mid-20th century and the advancement of civil rights and economic well-being of African Americans and Latinos. It also considers the extent to which unions and labor laws of that era were problematic for civil rights movements or diminished by growing rights consciousness in the 1960s. The document prompts consideration of how Wagner-era labor laws and 1960s-era civil rights laws impacted these relationships.
This you will begin to synthesize the information you.docx
This week, students will complete a recommendation analysis to synthesize the information gathered about their selected technology. The analysis should include an introduction explaining the technology, a thesis outlining the main arguments, identification of ethical dilemmas posed by the technology with examples and recommendations to address each dilemma. It should also cite at least three academic sources and be 3-4 pages following APA style. The assignment will be graded based on critical thinking, communication, information literacy, technology literacy, cultural competence, and global awareness demonstrated.
This is for Understanding the behavior of infection.docx
Cholera is a disease that can spread catastrophically if not controlled. To understand its spread and mitigate it, methods have been used to control growth and spread, though implementation faces challenges. Additional methods could be considered, and engaging reluctant populations is important to disease prevention.
The use of devices within information technology has increased exponentially....
The document discusses how information technology devices have increased exponentially over the last two decades and asks the reader to analyze how two specific types of devices are interconnected in a trusted environment and how they could create vulnerabilities in an existing enterprise network.
Steven Smith was employed by the Avon School District as.docx
Steven Smith, a high school English teacher, posted photos of his students' writing mistakes on Facebook along with comments about the errors. Though only visible to a group of his Facebook friends, someone found the posts inappropriate and notified the local newspaper. The school district was then anonymously tipped off about the upcoming newspaper article regarding the teacher's posts.
Students will assume the situation of an individual with.docx
Students are asked to put themselves in the shoes of a person with disabilities or access needs to identify three challenges they would face in a quick evacuation due to a disaster. They then must research and explain at least two resources for each challenge that would provide important information to help overcome the difficulties of evacuating.
The company that all students will use for their final.docx
The students will use Ford Motor Company for their final individual project. A virtual tour of Ford Motor Company will take place instead of a live visit. Students are expected to view the virtual tour of Ford Motor Company at the provided link.
the following critical elements must be Lens.docx
This document provides guidelines for a milestone assignment analyzing a popular culture artifact through two lenses: the natural/applied sciences lens and the social sciences lens. Students are instructed to analyze the movie "13 Going on 30" through these two lenses, explaining how each lens provides insight into the artifact's social impact and how it is informed by social issues. The analysis for each lens must be supported by at least two credible sources and cited in APA style. The entire submission should be 2 to 4 pages double-spaced with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins.
More from write22 (20)
Utilizing research software can be daunting for a What.docx
Utilizing research software can be daunting for a What.docx
To Prepare Reflect on your own community and consider the.docx
To Prepare Reflect on your own community and consider the.docx
Watch this video about Joseph concept of Creative.docx
Watch this video about Joseph concept of Creative.docx
write a 700 word psychoanalytic criticism research about the.docx
write a 700 word psychoanalytic criticism research about the.docx
You have had the opportunity to review thermoregulation as is.docx
You have had the opportunity to review thermoregulation as is.docx
What were American and British strategies for winning the.docx
What were American and British strategies for winning the.docx
What is the process involving movement of mantle rock that.docx
What is the process involving movement of mantle rock that.docx
Timeline of events what was happening that was important.docx
Timeline of events what was happening that was important.docx
To what degree did the emergence of a large union.docx
To what degree did the emergence of a large union.docx
This you will begin to synthesize the information you.docx
This you will begin to synthesize the information you.docx
This is for Understanding the behavior of infection.docx
This is for Understanding the behavior of infection.docx
The use of devices within information technology has increased exponentially....
The use of devices within information technology has increased exponentially....
Steven Smith was employed by the Avon School District as.docx
Steven Smith was employed by the Avon School District as.docx
Students will assume the situation of an individual with.docx
Students will assume the situation of an individual with.docx
The company that all students will use for their final.docx
The company that all students will use for their final.docx
Recently uploaded
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS Template 2023-2024 by: Irene S. Rueco
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Covered community pharmacy topic of the subject Social and preventive pharmacy for Diploma and Bachelor of pharmacy
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
Recently uploaded (20)
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience.docx
- 1. Assignment: Adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience Assignment: Adverse event or near miss from your nursing experienceAssignment: Adverse event or near miss from your nursing experienceWrite a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.Demonstration of ProficiencyBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a similar adverse event or near miss.Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.InstructionsFor this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill
- 2. the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels relating to each grading criterion.ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERSAnalyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.Describe how the event resulted from a patient’s medical management rather than from the underlying condition.Identify and evaluate the missed steps or protocol deviations leading to the event.Explain the extent to which the incident was preventable.Research the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities.Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.Evaluate the short- and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community). Analyze each stakeholder’s contribution to the event.Analyze the interprofessional team’s responsibilities and actions. Explain what measures each interprofessional team member should have taken to create a culture of safety.Describe any change to process or protocol implemented after the incident.Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.Analyze the quality improvement technologies put in place to increase patient safety and prevent recurrence of the near miss or adverse event.Determine the appropriateness of the technology application for a specific patient or situation.Research scholarly, evidence-based literature to learn how institutions can integrate solutions to prevent similar events.Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near-miss incident to support need for improvement.Identify the salient data associated with the adverse event or near miss that is generated from the facility’s dashboard.Note: Dashboard means data generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management.Analyze what the relevant metrics show.Explain research or data related to the adverse event or near miss that is available outside of your institution. Compare internal data to external data. Use resources such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), and the World Health Organization (WHO).Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent the recurrence of an adverse event or near miss.Explain, from an evidence-based viewpoint, how your facility now manages or should manage the process or protocol.Evaluate how other institutions addressed similar incidents or events.Analyze QI initiatives developed to prevent similar incidents. Explain why they are successful. Provide evidence of their success.Propose solutions for your selected institution that can be implemented to prevent similar future adverse events or near-miss incidents.Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.Example Assessment: You may use the Adverse Event or Near-Miss Analysis Exemplar [PDF] for an idea of what an assessment receiving a proficient or higher evaluation would look like.Additional RequirementsSubmission length: 5–7 typed, double-spaced pages.Font: Times New Roman, 12 points.Number of references: Cite a minimum of 5 current scholarly and/or authoritative
- 3. sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current literature is defined as no older than 5 years unless it is a seminal work.APA formatting: Citations and references must adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines. Consult these resources for an APA refresher:APA Style & Format.APA Module.American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA style. Retrieved from https://www.apastyle.org/Grading Rubric:1. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.Passing Grade: Analyzes the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty where further information could improve the analysis. Assignment: Adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience2. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.Passing Grade: Analyzes the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Identifies assumptions on which the analysis is based.3. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.Passing Grade: Evaluates quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Identifies criteria by which to evaluate the technologies.4. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near-miss incident to support need for improvement.Passing Grade: Incorporates relevant metrics of the adverse event or near- miss incident to support need for improvement. Evaluates the quality of the data.5. Outline an evidence-based quality improvement initiative to prevent an adverse event or near miss.Passing Grade: Outlines an evidence-based quality improvement initiative to prevent an adverse event or near miss. Impartially considers conflicting data and other perspectives.6. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.Passing Grade: Communicates analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective, and error-free manner, writing clearly and logically.7. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.Passing Grade: Integrates relevant sources to support arguments, formatting citations and references, using APA style without errors.