ProMIS: accelerating  surgical performance through simulation SAGES Phoenix, AZ April 2009 www.haptica.com | +1 617 342 7270 | info@haptica.com
Accelerating performance through simulation More  surgeons doing  more  procedures  more  proficiently –  in  less  time,  at  lower  cost and  at  lower  risk ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page  With simulation Without effective  simulation solution Time Adoption; Patient Safety
The  NEW  ProMIS3 ™ surgical simulator : 100%  of trainees felt that  ProMIS "simulated reality  effectively compared with only 38% in the VR group".  ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page  JSLS(2008)12:219-226
The  NEW  ProMIS3 ™ surgical simulator Real instruments interact with virtual  and  physical models, with  comprehensive metrics on performance Outperforms pure VR for MIS training  Metrics are “Excellent predictors” of scores in FLS; “predict readiness for FLS Certification”.  Basic Laparoscopic Skills and procedures Meets ACS & ACGME RRC requirements for simulation  Three surgical and technical innovation awards ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page  Pure VR Task in ProMIS—using real instruments ‘ Mixed reality’ Task: real anatomical model; real instruments; 3D graphics
Why ProMIS 3 ? Highly realistic camera image Flexible positioning and zoom Multiple real instruments in realistic port positions Team training and non-technical skills training Multiple procedures Improved metrics reporting and functionality Build, adapt and integrate Modules and Tasks—including FLS and local curriculum ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
Developing proficiency with ProMIS ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Augmented reality, graphics, video & audio provide guidance and instruction 1.  Show Physical and/or virtual anatomic model Tactile feedback Real instruments 2.  Practice Valid metrics & proficiency Records errors User and group records 3.  Measure Page
ProMIS Basic Laparoscopic Skills  Basic Laparoscopic Skills Laparoscope Orientation Instrument Handling Dissection  Suturing & Knot-tying  SAGES/ACS FLS Module ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
ProMIS LapAppendectomy Full LapAppendectomy procedure:  Investigation Diathermy Loop placement Cutting Mixed reality approach (virtual reality with real instruments and real appendix model) ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
ProMIS Lap Colectomy ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Full step-by-step procedure Mix of virtual and physical reality Uses real instruments Physical model enables realistic tactile feedback On-screen graphics, animations, video, audio, text Automatic metrics Page
ProMIS for Single Incision Surgery (SIS) ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 First simulator for Single Incision Surgery Will work for current ProMIS Modules Place any instruments (and any Task) in ProMIS and get proficiency metrics Ask now to participate in our trial to compare metrics on a FLS task when done pure lap vs SIS Page
ProMIS Metrics All tasks: measure Time Path length Economy of movement Hand dominance Play back track of instrument  Play back video of performance ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
Learning Management System Create users and Groups View records of  individual and group performance Query by user, group, specific Module, etc. Set proficiency levels Export data to Excel Network for remote access ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
Integrating ProMIS into the curriculum ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page  Use ProMIS Modules Record Users Use with FLS Use Your Own Modules
Customising and Developing Modules ‘ Open Module’: Put any existing Task in ProMIS and get standard metrics (as has been validated with FLS Tasks).  ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
ContentCreationTool Design new measurable Tasks Record/insert instruction video Add audio cues and on-screen text Insert augmented reality, graphics for on-screen guidance Set proficiency levels Edit existing ProMIS Tasks ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
Proven with FLS; Better than VR; Preferred by Users 100%  of trainees felt that ProMIS  "simulated reality effectively  compared  with only 38% in the VR group"  8   An  “excellent predictor” of scores in FLS ;  “predict readiness for FLS Certification” 1 2 3 Delivers  performance data with robotic  instrumentation 4   “ ProMIS  scored significantly higher  than SurgicalSIM;  better than LapSim on all  tested features” 5 6  ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page  1  SAGES 2006 S064 Ritter et al 2  SAGES 2006 P237 McCluney MD, et al 3  SAGES 2007 P279 McCluney et al 4  SAGES 2006 S065 Vuong et al 5  SAGES 2006 P224 Fellinger, et al 6  World J Surg. 2007 Apr. Botden et al 7  SAGES 2007 S077 Lin et al JSLS(2008)12:219-226
Why ProMIS wins in surgical simulation Best  curriculum Basic skills, procedures, FLS Best  instructional  approach Real instruments, real haptics  and  VR; team training Best  validation >25 studies validated Metrics; better than VR  Best  customization  Edit and design new Tasks to integrate with curriculum ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page

Haptica ProMIS @ SAGES 2010

  • 1.
    ProMIS: accelerating surgical performance through simulation SAGES Phoenix, AZ April 2009 www.haptica.com | +1 617 342 7270 | info@haptica.com
  • 2.
    Accelerating performance throughsimulation More surgeons doing more procedures more proficiently – in less time, at lower cost and at lower risk ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page With simulation Without effective simulation solution Time Adoption; Patient Safety
  • 3.
    The NEW ProMIS3 ™ surgical simulator : 100% of trainees felt that ProMIS "simulated reality effectively compared with only 38% in the VR group". ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page JSLS(2008)12:219-226
  • 4.
    The NEW ProMIS3 ™ surgical simulator Real instruments interact with virtual and physical models, with comprehensive metrics on performance Outperforms pure VR for MIS training Metrics are “Excellent predictors” of scores in FLS; “predict readiness for FLS Certification”. Basic Laparoscopic Skills and procedures Meets ACS & ACGME RRC requirements for simulation  Three surgical and technical innovation awards ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page Pure VR Task in ProMIS—using real instruments ‘ Mixed reality’ Task: real anatomical model; real instruments; 3D graphics
  • 5.
    Why ProMIS 3? Highly realistic camera image Flexible positioning and zoom Multiple real instruments in realistic port positions Team training and non-technical skills training Multiple procedures Improved metrics reporting and functionality Build, adapt and integrate Modules and Tasks—including FLS and local curriculum ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
  • 6.
    Developing proficiency withProMIS ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Augmented reality, graphics, video & audio provide guidance and instruction 1. Show Physical and/or virtual anatomic model Tactile feedback Real instruments 2. Practice Valid metrics & proficiency Records errors User and group records 3. Measure Page
  • 7.
    ProMIS Basic LaparoscopicSkills  Basic Laparoscopic Skills Laparoscope Orientation Instrument Handling Dissection  Suturing & Knot-tying  SAGES/ACS FLS Module ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
  • 8.
    ProMIS LapAppendectomy FullLapAppendectomy procedure: Investigation Diathermy Loop placement Cutting Mixed reality approach (virtual reality with real instruments and real appendix model) ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
  • 9.
    ProMIS Lap ColectomyProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Full step-by-step procedure Mix of virtual and physical reality Uses real instruments Physical model enables realistic tactile feedback On-screen graphics, animations, video, audio, text Automatic metrics Page
  • 10.
    ProMIS for SingleIncision Surgery (SIS) ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 First simulator for Single Incision Surgery Will work for current ProMIS Modules Place any instruments (and any Task) in ProMIS and get proficiency metrics Ask now to participate in our trial to compare metrics on a FLS task when done pure lap vs SIS Page
  • 11.
    ProMIS Metrics Alltasks: measure Time Path length Economy of movement Hand dominance Play back track of instrument Play back video of performance ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
  • 12.
    Learning Management SystemCreate users and Groups View records of individual and group performance Query by user, group, specific Module, etc. Set proficiency levels Export data to Excel Network for remote access ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
  • 13.
    Integrating ProMIS intothe curriculum ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page Use ProMIS Modules Record Users Use with FLS Use Your Own Modules
  • 14.
    Customising and DevelopingModules ‘ Open Module’: Put any existing Task in ProMIS and get standard metrics (as has been validated with FLS Tasks). ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
  • 15.
    ContentCreationTool Design newmeasurable Tasks Record/insert instruction video Add audio cues and on-screen text Insert augmented reality, graphics for on-screen guidance Set proficiency levels Edit existing ProMIS Tasks ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page
  • 16.
    Proven with FLS;Better than VR; Preferred by Users 100% of trainees felt that ProMIS "simulated reality effectively compared with only 38% in the VR group" 8 An “excellent predictor” of scores in FLS ; “predict readiness for FLS Certification” 1 2 3 Delivers performance data with robotic instrumentation 4 “ ProMIS scored significantly higher than SurgicalSIM; better than LapSim on all tested features” 5 6 ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page 1 SAGES 2006 S064 Ritter et al 2 SAGES 2006 P237 McCluney MD, et al 3 SAGES 2007 P279 McCluney et al 4 SAGES 2006 S065 Vuong et al 5 SAGES 2006 P224 Fellinger, et al 6 World J Surg. 2007 Apr. Botden et al 7 SAGES 2007 S077 Lin et al JSLS(2008)12:219-226
  • 17.
    Why ProMIS winsin surgical simulation Best curriculum Basic skills, procedures, FLS Best instructional approach Real instruments, real haptics and VR; team training Best validation >25 studies validated Metrics; better than VR Best customization Edit and design new Tasks to integrate with curriculum ProMISSAGES09 © Haptica 2009 Page