How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in americaJoel Leon
"When all institutions are under the dictate of a single thought or a single party, I mean the 3 powers of the state, legislative / judicial / executive, the citizen becomes a hero. In fact, the last shield to defend freedom. Montesquieu, Hobbes, and Fanon are in danger. "
How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in americaJoel Leon
"When all institutions are under the dictate of a single thought or a single party, I mean the 3 powers of the state, legislative / judicial / executive, the citizen becomes a hero. In fact, the last shield to defend freedom. Montesquieu, Hobbes, and Fanon are in danger. "
George W. Bush’s credibility has more holes it than one of Dick Cheney’s hunting partners. In 2009, following eight years of misrule, the axis-of incompetence finally vacated the White House; the world breathed a sigh of relief. Today, the Bush administration’s reputation may be worth less than a share of Enron’s stock selling on E-bay, but there are still some apologists who insist that the decisions Bush made in office will be vindicated by posterity. However, Bush vs. History makes a virtually irrefutable case showing why George W. Bush is destined to join the ranks of James Buchanan, Richard Nixon, Herbert Hoover, Andrew Johnson, and Warren Harding in the cellar of presidential ignominy.
To date, Bush has managed to escape the legal and moral reckoning for his lawless and criminally negligent tenure. However, the verdict of history is one thing Bush will not be able to evade. Bush vs. History pieces together essays, op-ed style articles, book and film reviews, and political humor organized around a central theme: showing how and why Bush failed the test of presidential leadership. Themes explored include: Bush and the Art of Leadership, Bush and Language, Bush’s Faith-Based Foreign Policy, Bush Economics, Bush and the Art of War, Bush and Torture, and Why the Right is Wrong for America.
In 2000, James Baker III, Bush family consigliore, and one of the finest sophists in our nation’s history, led an effort that eventually convinced the conservative majority on the U.S Supreme Court to effectively overturn the will of the electorate. Baker’s rhetorical skills were so beguiling that he probably could have used them to sell one-way tickets aboard a Russian submarine. However, it is now abundantly clear that those who engineered Bush’s victory in the infamous Bush vs. Gore decision helped steer this country towards disaster. Today, it is doubtful that even James Baker could salvage Bush’s reputation. Bush vs. Gore was a watershed in American history. For everyone who was outraged by Bush vs. Gore, Bush vs. History delivers what the aforementioned case failed to do; a measure of poetic justice.
These slides elucidates two aspects: one that which explains the reasons of US involvement in Afghanistan, with historical insight; while the other one portrays the major stakes of US in Afghanistan with respect to the emerging power politics of the world and the logic behind its pro-long presence since Post-Cold War.
Global Patriarchal Christian White Supremacy & the Road to the U.S. Capitol I...WarrenJBlumenfeld
The Stockholm-based International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance put the U.S. on a list of “backsliding democracies” in its November 2021 report. “The United States, the bastion of global democracy, fell victim to authoritarian tendencies itself,” the report found. Dr. Blumenfeld's presentation addresses some of the historical global roots of fascism and the social cleavages giving rise to anti-democratic leaders, which set the context for the January 6, 2021 Capitol Insurrection in the U.S.
Lightning talk given to SydJS, about using ARIA attributes as an off-shelf definition of state, as well as for accessbility. For a better transcript and some background, see http://weblog.200ok.com.au/2013/03/aria-sydjs-lightning-talk.html
George W. Bush’s credibility has more holes it than one of Dick Cheney’s hunting partners. In 2009, following eight years of misrule, the axis-of incompetence finally vacated the White House; the world breathed a sigh of relief. Today, the Bush administration’s reputation may be worth less than a share of Enron’s stock selling on E-bay, but there are still some apologists who insist that the decisions Bush made in office will be vindicated by posterity. However, Bush vs. History makes a virtually irrefutable case showing why George W. Bush is destined to join the ranks of James Buchanan, Richard Nixon, Herbert Hoover, Andrew Johnson, and Warren Harding in the cellar of presidential ignominy.
To date, Bush has managed to escape the legal and moral reckoning for his lawless and criminally negligent tenure. However, the verdict of history is one thing Bush will not be able to evade. Bush vs. History pieces together essays, op-ed style articles, book and film reviews, and political humor organized around a central theme: showing how and why Bush failed the test of presidential leadership. Themes explored include: Bush and the Art of Leadership, Bush and Language, Bush’s Faith-Based Foreign Policy, Bush Economics, Bush and the Art of War, Bush and Torture, and Why the Right is Wrong for America.
In 2000, James Baker III, Bush family consigliore, and one of the finest sophists in our nation’s history, led an effort that eventually convinced the conservative majority on the U.S Supreme Court to effectively overturn the will of the electorate. Baker’s rhetorical skills were so beguiling that he probably could have used them to sell one-way tickets aboard a Russian submarine. However, it is now abundantly clear that those who engineered Bush’s victory in the infamous Bush vs. Gore decision helped steer this country towards disaster. Today, it is doubtful that even James Baker could salvage Bush’s reputation. Bush vs. Gore was a watershed in American history. For everyone who was outraged by Bush vs. Gore, Bush vs. History delivers what the aforementioned case failed to do; a measure of poetic justice.
These slides elucidates two aspects: one that which explains the reasons of US involvement in Afghanistan, with historical insight; while the other one portrays the major stakes of US in Afghanistan with respect to the emerging power politics of the world and the logic behind its pro-long presence since Post-Cold War.
Global Patriarchal Christian White Supremacy & the Road to the U.S. Capitol I...WarrenJBlumenfeld
The Stockholm-based International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance put the U.S. on a list of “backsliding democracies” in its November 2021 report. “The United States, the bastion of global democracy, fell victim to authoritarian tendencies itself,” the report found. Dr. Blumenfeld's presentation addresses some of the historical global roots of fascism and the social cleavages giving rise to anti-democratic leaders, which set the context for the January 6, 2021 Capitol Insurrection in the U.S.
Lightning talk given to SydJS, about using ARIA attributes as an off-shelf definition of state, as well as for accessbility. For a better transcript and some background, see http://weblog.200ok.com.au/2013/03/aria-sydjs-lightning-talk.html
This year, we thought it would be fun to try our hands at trends prediction. So we polled our designers and strategists to come up with 11 trends that they feel will make themselves felt this year in Central and Eastern Europe. This is by no means a scientific survey, but rather the opinions of our own group of experts –people who work within the region daily, based on their own insights and ‘gut-feelings’. We present our findings here in this simple presentation. We hope you enjoy!
Wrap up & way forward Anna Spenceley Jim Barborak Rita CasimiroAnna Spenceley
This presentation by Anna Spenceley, Jim Barborak and Rita Casimiro was delivered at the 'Concessioning tourism opportunities in conservation areas and maximising rural development' workshop, held in Maputo between 19-22 March 2012 (Day 3, Session 10, Wrap up and way forward)
Netanyahu vs. the Rest of the WorldBenjamin Netanyahus reckless.docxrosemarybdodson23141
Netanyahu vs. the Rest of the World
Benjamin Netanyahu's reckless policies will further isolate Israel and alienate the United States. He is leading his country down a perilous path.
Published in Die Zeit (Germany) on 23 March 2015 by Martin Klingst [link to original]
Translated from German by Ron Argentati. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
Posted on March 25, 2015.
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sees his nation surrounded by enemies — us against the rest of the world is the mindset he held for the past six years of his administration and it appears to be how he will continue in the future.
The majority of Israelis share his view and elected him to another term in office. But his ruthless policies will not only isolate his nation further, they will also continue to alienate America.
President Obama has already threatened to review bilateral relations between the U.S. and Israel. The disappointments and bitterness caused by Netanyahu's refusal to compromise, his duplicity and the brutal style of his actions have become too great.
Throughout the grueling Middle East conflict, the rule of thumb has been that Israel's conservative governments had been most open to making concessions to the Palestinians and Israel's Arab neighbors because they were not immediately suspected of betraying Israeli national interests.
Menachim Begin, the first prime minister from the far right, concluded a peace treaty with Egypt. Then conservative Ariel Sharon ordered Israel's unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza strip. Both men made their careers with the Likud party which Netanyahu now leads.
“Bibi” Never Favored the Two-State
Solution
But “Bibi,” as the Israelis call him, seemed to be exempt from this rule. On the contrary, his brutal lack of compromise that alienate even his closest allies threatens to put Israel's future at risk. Despite his protestations to the contrary, he was never genuinely for a two-state solution. Exactly like his arch-conservative father, he also envisions a “Greater Israel” that encompasses the West Bank and stretches from the Mediterranean Ocean to the Jordan River. It's only with these expanded borders that Netanyahu sees Israeli security finally guaranteed for the long term.
Inevitably, more Palestinians would live in this larger country than previously. Therefore, Netanyahu and his conservative allies want to enshrine for once and for all the idea that Israel must remain a Jewish state. Currently, absent territorial expansion, every fifth citizen is an Arab-Israeli. That's why Netanyahu will have to soon resurrect his controversial proposed law that, regardless of a large Arab minority, Israel be forever a Jewish nation.
“Jewish” and “democratic” won't work in an expanded Israel as the noted commentator and author Tom Friedman writes in the New York Times. Israel would then have only two options: Having a non-Jewish democracy or a Jewish non-democracy.
Obama Will Give Up Trying
That's the general opinion, above all outside of.
How Stephen Miller Seized the Moment to Battle Immigration B.docxpooleavelina
How Stephen Miller Seized the Moment to Battle Immigration
By Jason DeParle
The New York Times
August 27, 2019
WASHINGTON—When historians try to explain how opponents of immigration
captured the Republican Party, they may turn to the spring of 2007, when George W.
Bush threw his waning powers behind a legalization plan and conservative populists
buried it in scorn.
Mr. Bush was so taken aback, he said he worried about America “losing its soul,” and
immigration politics have never been the same.
That spring was significant for another reason, too: An intense young man with wary,
hooded eyes and fiercely anti-immigrant views graduated from college and began a
meteoric rise as a Republican operative. With the timing of a screenplay, the man and
the moment converged.
Stephen Miller was 22 and looking for work in Washington. He lacked government
experience but had media appearances on talk radio and Fox News and a history of
pushing causes like “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.” A first-term congresswoman
from Minnesota offered him a job interview and discovered they were reading the same
book: a polemic warning that Muslim immigration cold mean “the end of the world as
we know it.”
By the end of the interview, Representative Michele Bachmann had a new press
secretary. And a dozen years later, Mr. Miller, now a senior adviser to President Trump,
is presiding over one of the most fervent attacks on immigration in American history.
The story of Mr. Miller’s rise has been told with a focus on his pugnacity and paradoxes.
Known more for his enemies than his friends, he is a conservative firebrand from liberal
Santa Monica, Calif., and a descendant of refugees who is seeking to eliminate refugee
programs. He is a Duke graduate in bespoke suits who rails against the perfidy of so-
called elites. Among those who have questioned his moral fitness are his uncle, his
childhood rabbi and 3,400 fellow Duke alumni.
Less attention has been paid to the forces that have abetted his rise and eroded
Republican support for immigration — forces Mr. Miller has personified and advanced
in a career unusually reflective of its times.
Rising fears of terrorism after the Sept. 11 attacks brought new calls to keep immigrants
out. Declining need for industrial labor left fewer businesses clamoring to bring them in.
A surge of migrants across the South stoked a backlash in the party’s geographic base.
Conservative media, once divided, turned against immigration, and immigration-
reduction groups that had operated on the margins grew in numbers and sophistication.
Abandoning calls for minority outreach, the Republican Party chose instead to energize
2
its conservative white base — heeding strategists who said the immigrant vote was not
just a lost cause but an existential threat.
Arriving in Washington as these forces coalesced, Mr. Miller rode the tailwinds with zeal
and skill. Warning of terrorism and disturbed by multic ...
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
1. 28 TAMMUZ 5772 JULY 18, 2012 IsraelA6 HAMODIA
Feature / By Joel Rebibo
Ari Fleischer doesn’t believe
President Barack Obama
deserves credit, or the Jewish
vote, for providing Israel with
hundreds of millions of dol-
lars — above and beyond the
regular military aid — to pur-
chase additional Iron Dome
antimissile batteries.
“Military cooperation with
Israel has always been a given
for U.S. administrations,” says
Fleischer, who was White
House spokesman in 2001-
2003 under President George
Bush. “It’s automatic. And since
military technology is always
advancing, it means funding
new weapons systems as they
are introduced.
“The problem with Obama is
not the givens, but what he’s
doing, and what he’s doing is
making the United States neu-
tral on the conflict between
Israel and the Palestinians. He’s
grasping for something he can
brag about, and the only thing
he can brag about is something
that is a given.”
Fleischer, who says he’s hap-
pily retired from active politics,
runs his own management con-
sulting firm in New York and
serves on the board of the
Republican Jewish Coalition.
He was in Israel last week to
urge Americans in Israel to reg-
ister for the November vote
and, of course, to cast their
ballot for Mitt Romney.
Though he’s formally out of
politics, Fleischer is clearly in
his element when discussing
polls and trends and what to
look for as the U.S. presiden-
tial elections draw closer.
“There are four numbers
that are important,” he says.
“11, 16, 19 and 24.”
Those figures represent the
percentage of the Jewish vote
that Republican presidential
candidates garnered in the
past two decades. In 1992,
President George H. W. Bush
won 11% of the Jewish vote in
his losing campaign to Bill
Clinton. In 1996, Republican
Bob Dole got 16% in his loss to
Clinton; in 2000, President
George W. Bush gained 19% in
his victory over Al Gore; and in
2004, Bush got 24% in his win
over John Kerry. While John
McCain’s support in the 2008
race dropped to 22%, the trend
is clear.
“Republicans have been
making deep inroads into
Democratic territory for
decades,” Fleischer notes.
“And because of Obama’s
weakness on Israel, I see
Romney doing even better,
getting 25% of the Jewish vote,
maybe more.”
On existential issues like
Iran, Fleischer is convinced
that Romney will stand by
Israel, in stark contrast to
Obama, who has been “push-
ing Israel around.”
“Romney will show consis-
tency, strength and determi-
nation — as opposed to
Obama’s silence, vacillating
and weakness — which history
shows is a deterrent to war,” he
says.
RJC Executive Director
Matt Brooks, who accompa-
nied Fleischer on his trip last
week, takes particular excep-
tion to Obama’s claim that his
administration has led the
effort on sanctions against
Iran. “The president actively
opposed sanctions, but only
came around, kicking and
screaming, after a Republican
Congress took the lead and
passed legislation, which he
then took credit for.
“In the 2013 proposed
budget, he wanted to cut mis-
sile defense spending by 22%.
Thanks to our Republican
friends in Congress, the fund-
ing was restored and even
increased. Now he’s trying to
take credit.
“It’s part of a troubling pat-
tern, whereby the president
opposes something and, then,
when he finds he’s on the
wrong side, tries to take credit
for it.”
Where does Romney stand
on moving the U.S. Embassy
from Tel Aviv to Yerushalayim,
Israel’s capital? Will he prom-
ise to implement the
Jerusalem Embassy Act of
1995, like every other
Republican candidate, and
then sign a presidential waiver
that lets him off the hook?
Fleischer finesses the issue.
“He wants to move the
embassy and will consult with
Israeli leaders about timing
and the best way to accom-
plish it,” he says. “He’s taking a
nuanced position on it.”
While John McCain won
just 22% of the American
Jewish vote in 2008, com-
pared to 78% for Obama, the
figures were reversed among
Americans living in Israel,
who, perhaps due to the dis-
tance, weren’t captivate by the
Obama magic.
“American Jews in Israel
were the first to detect the
early warning signals on
Obama,” says Fleischer. “In
2009, I warned that Jews in
America would have buyer’s
remorse, but in Israel people
already saw the emptiness in
Obama’s remarks.
“Americans who live in
Israel are by definition believ-
ers in national security and
peace through strength, and
therefore more likely to vote
Republican.”
Beyond the Jewish vote,
Fleischer is convinced that
Obama is losing support
among the general public. He
notes a recent Washington
Post poll showing Obama and
Romney tied at 47%. Gallup
shows a 46%-46% tie.
“When an incumbent is
polling below 50%, he’s in
trouble,” says Fleischer. “The
magic is gone.”
In Fleischer’s view, three
The Bare Minimum on Israel
President Obama is casting himself as a friend of Israel, pointing to additional funding for Iron Dome
missile systems. But former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer points to what the president
has said and done on Iran and the Palestinian issue, and comes to a very different conclusion.
It’s crunch time, says Rabbi
YechielKalish,nationaldirector
of government affairs for
Agudath Israel of America,
explaining why he made a light-
ning visit to Eretz Yisrael this
week,despitetheintenseprepa-
rations in New York for the
Siyum HaShas.
“We have two months to get
American citizens in Israel to
register to vote in the U.S. elec-
tions,” he told Hamodia.
Recognizing that “many
chareidim will only vote if the
Gedolei Yisrael are behind the
concept,” Rabbi Kalish came to
Israel to present a kol korei on
the subject to Harav Aharon
Leib Steinman and Harav
Chaim Kanievsky, and ask for
their signatures.
He was accompanied by
Harav Aharon Feldman, the
Rosh Yeshivah of Ner Israel in
Baltimore, and a letter from the
Novominsker Rebbe in New
York explaining the vital
importance of getting Ame-
ricans in Israel to vote.
In the works is a second kol
korei that will be signed by
Admorim and aimed at the
Chassidishe world.
“Communities that vote are
communities that are listened
to,” says Rabbi Kalish, explain-
ing the importance of people
registering to vote. “Reb Moshe
Feinstein and Reb Yaakov
Kamenetsky said it was a chiyuv
gamur, an absolute obligation,
to vote.”
Rav Feldman has said that
someone who doesn’t vote is
saying that the issues that are
important to Klal Yisrael aren’t
important to him.
When Americans in Israel
vote in large numbers it has a
double benefit, adds Rabbi
Kalish.
“Every vote cast from Eretz
Yisrael comes from someone
concerned for the safety and
security of people living there,
and this will be understood in
Washington,” he says. But, in
addition, since the vast majori-
ty of voters in Israel are from
the New York area, it gives
Agudah more clout in
Washington when fighting for
issues that are crucial to the
Jewish community in the
United States.
“The positive effect that
comes from the 20 minutes it
takes to register if absolutely
incredible,” Rabbi Kalish
explains. “I have no doubt that
once people understand this,
they’ll register in very large
numbers.”
‘Communities That Vote Are
Communities That Are Listened To’
Rabbi Yechiel Kalish: “Reb Moshe
Feinstein and Reb Yaakov Kamenetsky
said it was a chiyuv gamur, an
absolute obligation, to vote.”
Kuvien Images
Matt Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition (R), Ari Fleischer (C), and Rabbi Shmuel Machlis of
the American Citizens’ Gemach, a division of Agudath Israel of America. “It’s a troubling pattern, whereby the president
opposes something and, then, when he finds he’s on the wrong side, tries to take credit for it,” says Brooks.
2. 28 TAMMUZ 5772 JULY 18, 2012Israel HAMODIA A7
things propelled Obama to vic-
tory in 2008, and they are all
absent this time round: the
war in Iraq, anti-George Bush
sentiment and the magic of
Barack Obama.
He points to the political
battering Obama has taken in
the past few years: In 2009, gov-
ernorships in New Jersey and
Virginia went to the
Republicans; in 2010, Ted
Kennedy’s Senate seat went to
the Republicans and the mid-
term congressional elections
showed the biggest swing since
1938; in 2011, Anthony Weiner’s
seat in Queens went Repub-
lican; in 2012 the recall in
Wisconsin went in favor of the
Republicans.
“All the momentum is on the
Republican side,” he says.
Fleischer is willing to go out
on a limb and make a bold pre-
diction. As opposed to all those
who predict a tight race, he fore-
casts an “October surprise” that
will see “the bottom fall out on
the president’s numbers” and
Romney going on to win the
election handily.
“The economy is the issue —
jobs, deficits, debts. And if he
doesn’t turn it around, he’s fin-
ished.”
Fleischer believes that
Romney’s visit to Israel,
planned for the end of this
month, will be a chance for him
to clarify his stand on Israel and
set himself apart from Obama,
who hasn’t visited Israel since
his election (even when he made
his trip to neighboring Egypt).
“Obama doesn’t miss an
opportunity to take an opportu-
nity to take a swipe at Israel,” he
says. “Romney is a strong sup-
porter.”
Romney, who has said his
policies toward Israel will be the
opposite of Obama’s, will meet
with Prime Minister Binyamin
Netanyahu and PA Chairman
Mahmoud Abbas and is expect-
ed to address his vision of the
Middle East, especially in light
of the recent turmoil.
Does Romney’s visit put
Netanyahu in an uncomfortable
position vis-à-vis Obama? Will a
warm welcome of the presumed
Republican presidential candi-
date be perceived in
Washington as Israel mingling
in internal American affairs?
“Netanyahu and Romney are
two experienced politicians,”
smiles Fleischer. “They’ll know
how to handle it.”
In the final analysis, if
Fleischer sees Romney winning
handily in November, why
should Israel’s Americans both-
er to register to vote? The
answer is obvious: Fleischer
doesn’t have a crystal ball, and
the United States has had its
share of close calls in recent
years.
“Imagine it’s Nov. 7, you wake
up, after not voting, and you
hear we have another razor-thin
election,” Fleischer told a stand-
ing-room-only town hall event
in Modiin earlier last week.
“Americans in Israel equal the
number of voters in Dayton or
Ft. Lauderdale. You’re equally
important.”
But why, for example, should
I register — I come from
Arizona, where the Republicans
are a shoo-in? First, says
Brooks, there’s no such thing as
a shoo-in. Second, there are
congressional races that are also
important.
Two other key players in the
push to get Americans in Israel
to vote are Elie Pieprz, national
director of I Vote Israel, and
Rabbi Shmuel B. Machlis, assis-
tant director of American
Citizens Gemach, a division of
Agudath Israel of America. Both
groups are nonpartisan, with
Rabbi Machlis spearheading the
voter-registration drive in the
religious sector.
Pieprz, whose group ar-
ranged Fleischer and Brooks’
visit and is scheduled to bring to
Israel figures representing the
Democratic party, stresses the
importance of Americans in
Israel voting.
“We’re trying to make it easi-
er to register and to make
Americans in Israel understand
that their vote counts,” says
Pieprz. “In a way, a vote cast
from Israel is more impactful. If
the people in Washington see
that we’re requesting two or
three times as many ballots as
in previous elections, they’ll sit
up and take notice. The knowl-
edge that people in Israel are
voting could impact on policy,
as well as on other Jewish vot-
ers back home in the United
States.
“We’re tapping in on concern
that people here feel, the sense
of vulnerability and the recog-
nition that what happens in
America — the economy, for
instance — impacts on those liv-
ing in Israel.”
Adds Rabbi Machlis: “There
is a lot of apathy in some com-
munities here. People aren’t as
involved as we’d like to see. But
we are making progress, and
people are certainly responsive
when they hear that the
Gedolim are fully behind this
and are urging Americans in
Israel to register and vote.”
For information on how to con-
tact your local representative,
please call the office of American
CitizensGemachat(03)912-5626;
vote@acgemach.org
Kuvien Images
Ari Fleischer (L) with Matt Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition. According to Fleischer,
“Obama doesn’t miss an opportunity to take an opportunity to take a swipe at Israel. Romney is a strong supporter.”
There are more than 160,000 Americans living in Israel who are eligible to vote in the upcoming elections.
Fleischerforecastsan“Octobersurprise”thatwill
see“thebottomfalloutonthepresident’s
numbers”andRomneygoingontowintheelection
handily.