SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 139
Download to read offline
River Basin Management Plans 
Click here to start
In general it is about the Water Framework Directive. 
You have already heard about WFD? Great! 
If not, here is some information: 
The WFD aims to unify the European water policy by providing a framework for the protection of surface water, coastal and transitional waters as well as for groundwater. 
Goal: A good ecological and chemical status of European surface waters and groundwater . 
What is the game about?
Implementation of the WFD 
2003 
Implementation in national law 
2004 Inventory 
2006 Monitoring 
2009 
Establishment and Publishing of River Basin Management Plans 
2012 
Implementation of River Basin Management Plans 
2015 
Achievement of goals 
Steps to take until the year 2015
River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) 
What is it? 
Plans are a requirement of the Water Framework Directive and a means of 
achieving the protection, improvement and sustainable use of the water 
environment across Europe. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Basin_Management_Plans) 
Some countries in Europe have already completed these plans, however some 
are still not completed. 
By the way, the deadline for submitting the RBMPs was in 2009 . . .!
How well do you know the water bodies in Europe and the status of implementation of the RBMPs? ...let’s find out.
Let’s get some basics down: We will use these symbols to represent the current status of implementation and the quality of water: 
Good 
Moderate 
Poor and Bad 
Make sure you keep track of your points during the game. If you get it right, you will get 3 points, and if you get it wrong, you get -1 point. 
Always click on the “ ” button to return to the map. 
Once you finished all countries click Good luck!
Explanation of the assignment to a face symbol: 
Implementation: 
= complete RBMP was reported 
= incomplete RBMP was reported 
= RBMP not reported or the reported documents are not meeting the requirements 
Water quality: 
% of water bodies having a high or good ecological status 
= > 60% 
= 40-60% 
= <40% 
For additional information visit the website of the European Commission: 
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/participation/map_mc/map.htm 
Additional Information:
Select a country to begin the quiz! 
UK 
Denmark 
Ireland 
Germany 
Spain 
Portugal 
Italy 
Finland 
Estonia 
Latvia 
Lithuania 
Poland 
France 
Sweden 
Norway 
Austria 
Netherland 
Belgium 
Greece 
Bulgaria 
Romania 
Croatia 
Slovenia 
Slovakia 
Hungary 
Czech Republik 
Macedonia 
Serbia 
Albania 
Bosnia and Herzegovina 
Iceland 
Belarus
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: 
The United Kingdom 
The UK has identified 16 river basin districts. There are 11 in England and Wales, 3 in Scotland and 4 in Northern Ireland (including 3 international RBDs). One river basin district, Solway Tweed, is in both England and Scotland.
The consultation process is completed. The UK has done a great job so far in following the direction of the River Basin Management Plans. They have been very compliant and have provided detailed information on the water bodies in the UK. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The consultation process is completed. The UK has done a great job so far in following the direction of the River Basin Management Plans. They have been very compliant and have provided detailed information on the water bodies in the UK. 
Don’t forget to click here 
In England and Wales about 40% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. Assessment methods for the classification of ecological status are fully developed for all biological quality elements in river and coastal waters, but are not developed for fish in lakes. Phytoplankton has not been developed for transitional waters across the UK. 
Don’t forget to click here 
In England and Wales about 40% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. Assessment methods for the classification of ecological status are fully developed for all biological quality elements in river and coastal waters, but are not developed for fish in lakes. Phytoplankton has not been developed for transitional waters across the UK. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Denmark 
Denmark has four river basin districts (River Basin District I : Jylland and Fyn, River Basin District 2 : Sjaelland, River Basin District 3 : Bornholm, River Basin District 4 : International RBD ).
Denmark takes a narrow approach to water services. The polluter pays principle is applied for wastewater treatment and water supply with 100 % of the funding of the service provided by users, but there is no information about cost recovery for other water services (e.g. for water used for irrigation and directly abstracted from the source by farmers). 
Don’t forget to click here 
Denmark takes a narrow approach to water services. The polluter pays principle is applied for wastewater treatment and water supply with 100 % of the funding of the service provided by users, but there is no information about cost recovery for other water services (e.g. for water used for irrigation and directly abstracted from the source by farmers). 
Don’t forget to click here 
In Denmark less than 30% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. It has a national approach to the assessment of ecological status. Comparison between the RBMPs and the 2009 WFD implementation report for Danish 
methods shows that fewer methods are available now, however Danish authorities have clarified that new assessment methods are in development. 
Don’t forget to click here 
In Denmark less than 30% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. It has a national approach to the assessment of ecological status. Comparison between the RBMPs and the 2009 WFD implementation report for Danish 
methods shows that fewer methods are available now, however Danish authorities have clarified that new assessment methods are in development. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: 
Ireland 
Ireland has 7 river basin districts, out of which 3 are international RBDs and sharing water courses with Northern Ireland.
The RBMPs were adopted on 6 July 2010. Discussions are underway to change the administrative arrangements. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Don’t forget to click here  
The RBMPs were adopted on 6 July 2010. Discussions are underway to change the administrative arrangements.
Over 50% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. A method for assessing acidification status using macroinvertebrates in lakes will be adopted and a method for trophic status using macroinvertebrates is still in development. It is not clear if methods for phytoplankton and benthic invertebrates in transitional waters will be developed 
Don’t forget to click here 
Over 50% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. A method for assessing acidification status using macroinvertebrates in lakes will be adopted and a method for trophic status using macroinvertebrates is still in development. It is not clear if methods for phytoplankton and benthic invertebrates in transitional waters will be developed 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: 
Germany 
Germany has 10 river basin districts, 6 of which are international sharing water courses with Denmark to the north, Poland and Czech Republic to the east, Austria, Switzerland and France to the south and southeast and Luxembourg, Belgium and the Netherlands to the west.
Some Länder worked together to submit one plan, while other 
Länder produced individual plans for the same basin, sometimes to varying degrees of detail. The result of these differences is only a patchwork of information on how the WFD is being implemented. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Don’t forget to click here  
Some Länder worked together to submit one plan, while other 
Länder produced individual plans for the same basin, sometimes to varying degree of detail. The result of these differences is only a patchwork of information on how the WFD is being implemented.
There was noticeable improvement when the situation on ecological assessment methods available for Germany in 2007 was compared to the assessment methods reported in all available DE RBMPs. 
Don’t forget to click here 
There was noticeable improvement when the situation on ecological assessment methods available for Germany in 2007 was compared to the assessment methods reported in all 
available DE RBMPs. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Spain 
Spain has 25 river basin districts, 6 of which are international sharing water courses with France to the northeast and Portugal to the west.
With the exception of the River Basin District of Distrito Fluvial de Catalonia (ES100), Spain has not reported RBMPs to the Commission. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Don’t forget to click here  
With the exception of the River Basin District of Distrito Fluvial de Catalonia (ES100), Spain has not reported RBMPs to the Commission.
Assessment methods are reported to be fully developed for all biological quality elements in lakes and transitional water, however, it is not clear if this is the case. Assessment methods are partly developed for biological quality elements for all or some in rivers and coastal waters. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Assessment methods are reported to be fully developed for all biological quality elements in lakes and transitional water, however, it is not clear if this is the case. Assessment methods are partly developed for biological quality elements for all or some in rivers and coastal waters. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Belgium 
Belgium belongs to 4 international river basin districts sharing water courses with the Netherlands, France, Luxemburg and Germany.
Only the two RBMPs of the Flemish Region and the Federal plan on the coastal waters have been adopted and reported. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Don’t forget to click here  
Only the two RBMPs of the Flemish Region and the Federal plan on the coastal waters have been adopted and reported.
80% of the natural surface water bodies of Belgium have a poor or bad ecological status! The other 20% have a moderate status. 
Regarding the supporting elements for the biological assessment, class boundaries have been set for physico- chemical quality elements although it is not clear from the RBMP how these are related to the BQE classes. 
Don’t forget to click here 
80% of the natural surface water bodies of Belgium have a poor or bad ecological status! The other 20% have a moderate status. 
Regarding the supporting elements for the biological assessment, class boundaries have been set for physico- chemical quality elements although it is not clear from the RBMP how these are related to the BQE classes. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Portugal 
Portugal has 10 river basin districts (8 in mainland Portugal, 1 in the Azores archipelago and 1 in Madeira archipelago), 4 of which (Minho, Douro, Tejo and Guadiana) are international sharing water courses with Spain.
Portugal has not reported RBMPs to the Commission. All the 8 RBMPs of Continental Portugal, and the RBMP of the Azores started Public Consultation in the second semester of 2011. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Don’t forget to click here  
Portugal has not reported RBMPs to the Commission. All the 8 RBMPs of Continental Portugal, and the RBMP of the Azores started Public Consultation in the second semester of 2011.
A court ruling has been issued against Portugal by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the failure to adopt and report River Basin Management Plans for all of their respective River Basin Districts. 
Don’t forget to click here 
A court ruling has been issued against Portugal by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the failure to adopt and report River Basin Management Plans for all of their respective River Basin Districts. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
The Netherlands 
The Netherlands have 4 river basin districts, all of which are international sharing water courses with Belgium, France, Luxemburg, Germany.
In the Netherlands, the WFD River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) were adopted by the government on the 27 November 2009. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Don’t forget to click here  
In the Netherlands, the WFD River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) were adopted by the government on the 27 November 2009.
66.7% of the natural surface water bodies of the Netherlands have moderate ecological status! None of the water bodies have a good or high status nor a bad one. Almost a third are unknown! 
Don’t forget to click here 
66.7% of the natural surface water bodies of the Netherlands have moderate ecological status! None of the water bodies have a good or high status nor a bad one. Almost a third are unknown! 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Italy 
Italy has 8 river basin districts, 2 of which are international sharing water courses with France to the west, Switzerland and Austria to the north and Slovenia to the east.
In Italy, each RBMP was adopted by the ‘permanent institutional conference’ of the RBD Authority on 24 February 2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Don’t forget to click here  
In Italy, each RBMP was adopted by the ‘permanent institutional conference’ of the RBD Authority on 24 February 2010.
Many RBMPs refer instead to the use of indices established under previous Italian legislation to determine ecological status: in particular, the SECA (Stato ecologico dei corsi d’acqua, ecological status of waterways), mainly for river 
water bodies, which uses benthic macro-invertebrates as well as physico-chemical elements. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Many RBMPs refer instead to the use of indices established under previous Italian legislation to determine ecological status: in particular, the SECA (Stato ecologico dei corsi d’acqua, ecological status of waterways), mainly for river 
water bodies, which uses benthic macro-invertebrates as well as physico-chemical elements. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Finland 
Finland has 8 river basin districts, out of which 2 are international sharing water courses with Sweden to the west and Norway to the north. The Åland islands is one river basin district, with separate legislation and implementation.
All Finnish RBMPs were published on 10.12.2009, and reported to the Commission on 19.03.2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
All Finnish RBMPs were published on 10.12.2009, and reported to the Commission on 19.03.2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The ecological status of natural water bodies is to a relatively large extent unknown, with up to 81.7 % of all water bodies in a northern RBDs like Oulujoki_Iijoki (FIVHA4). Ecological potential in heavily modified water bodies are relatively better assessed, but also here the more northern RBD area subject to a higher degree of uncertainty. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The ecological status of natural water bodies is to a relatively large extent unknown, with up to 81.7 % of all water bodies in a northern RBDs like Oulujoki_Iijoki (FIVHA4). Ecological potential in heavily modified water bodies are relatively better assessed, but also here the more northern RBD area subject to a higher degree of uncertainty. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: 
Estonia 
Estonia has 3 river basin districts, out of which 2 are international sharing water courses with Russia to the east and Latvia to the south.
RBMPs for East-Estonia, West-Estonia and Koiva river basins were adopted by the Government on 1 April 2010. Updated information was reported in November 2012 and April 2011. 
Don’t forget to click here 
RBMPs for East-Estonia, West-Estonia and Koiva river basins were adopted by the Government on 1 April 2010. Updated information was reported in November 2012 and April 2011. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The ecological status of natural water bodies is fully known ; more than 70 % of all water bodies are in a high or good ecological status and 0% in a bad status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The ecological status of natural water bodies is fully known ; more than 70 % of all water bodies are in a high or good ecological status and 0% in a bad status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: 
France 
France has identified 12 river basin districts, out of which 4 are overseas territories. Among the remaining 8, 6 have a land border with another European country, Belgium, Luxemburg, Germany, Switzerland, Italy or Spain.
In France, the River Basin Management Plans, called SDAGE (Schéma Directeur d'Aménagement et de Gestion des Eaux) were adopted in December 2009. 
Don’t forget to click here 
In France, the River Basin Management Plans, called SDAGE (Schéma Directeur d'Aménagement et de Gestion des Eaux) were adopted in December 2009. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Almost 35% of surface water bodies have been assessed as being in good ecological status, and 6.5% as being in high ecological status. However, 56.4% of surface water bodies are considered to be in less than good status (almost 40% in moderate, 12.5% in poor and just over 4% in bad status). There are just over 2% of French surface water bodies in unknown ecological status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Almost 35% of surface water bodies have been assessed as being in good ecological status, and 6.5% as being in high ecological status. However, 56.4% of surface water bodies are considered to be in less than good status (almost 40% in moderate, 12.5% in poor and just over 4% in bad status). There are just over 2% of French surface water bodies in unknown ecological status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Lithuania 
Lithuania has 4 river basin districts, all of which are international. Nemuno RBD shares water courses with Byelorussia, Kaliningrad (Russia) and Poland. The other 3 - Dauguvos, Ventos and Lielupės - RBDs share water courses with Latvia.
The Nemunas RBMP and PoM were adopted by Government July 2010. The Lielupe, Venta and Dauguva RBMPs and PoMs were adopted by Government 17 November 2010. The RBMPs were reported to the Commission in two stages, whereby the last 3 RBMPs were reported in November 2010. Updates were provided to WISE until January 2011 and in January 2012. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The Nemunas RBMP and PoM were adopted by Government July 2010. The Lielupe, Venta and Dauguva RBMPs and PoMs were adopted by Government 17 November 2010. The RBMPs were reported to the Commission in two stages, whereby the last 3 RBMPs were reported in November 2010. Updates were provided to WISE until January 2011 and in January 2012. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The current ecological status or ecological potential is lower than good (more than 50 % of water bodies are in good ecological status and 0.4 % are in unknown status). 
Don’t forget to click here 
Still needs to be changed: The current ecological status or ecological potential is lower than good (more than 50 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 0.4 percentages are in unknown status 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Latvia 
Latvia has 4 river basin districts, all of them are international sharing water courses – with Lithuania to the south, Byelorussia and Russia to the east and Estonia to the north.
The final version of the River basin district management plans was approved by the Order of the Minister of Environment on 6 May 2010. The RBMPs were reported to the Commission on 18 May 2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The final version of the River basin district management plans was approved by the Order of the Minister of Environment on 6 May 2010. The RBMPs were reported to the Commission on 18 May 2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
51% of the Latvian surface water bodies and almost all groundwater bodies are classified as having good or high status. Despite the shortcomings of the monitoring program and surface waters classification system the assessment correctly reflects the real situation. 
Don’t forget to click here 
51% of the Latvian surface water bodies and almost all groundwater bodies are classified as having good or high status. Despite the shortcomings of the monitoring program and surface waters classification system the assessment correctly reflects the real situation. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Norway 
Norway has 9 river basin districts, out of which 5 are international sharing water courses with Sweden, Finland and Russia to the east.
Norway transposed the Water Framework Directive (WFD) into national legislation (the Water Regulation) in January 2007, and performed a voluntary implementation of the WFD in selected sub-districts across the country from 2007 until 2009, thus gaining experience of river basin management planning and enabling Norway to take part in the sharing of experiences in the Common Implementation Strategy. Pilot River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) for the selected pilot sub-districts were adopted by the regional County Councils in 2009, and approved by the national Government in June 2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Norway transposed the Water Framework Directive (WFD) into national legislation (the Water Regulation) in January 2007, and performed a voluntary implementation of the WFD in selected sub-districts across the country from 2007 until 2009, thus gaining experience of river basin management planning and enabling Norway to take part in the sharing of experiences in the Common Implementation Strategy. Pilot River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) for the selected pilot sub-districts were adopted by the regional County Councils in 2009, and approved by the national Government in June 2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The current ecological status or ecological potential is lower than good (more than 40 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 20 percentages are in unknown status). 
Don’t forget to click here 
The current ecological status or ecological potential is lower than good (more than 40 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 20 percentages are in unknown status) 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Poland 
Poland has 10 river basin districts, out of which 8 are international sharing water courses with Russia to the north, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine to the east, Slovakia and Czech Republic to the south and Germany to the west.
All Polish RBMPs were adopted on 22 February 2011 by the Council of Ministers and subsequently published in the official journal. They were all reported to the Commission in July 2011. 
Don’t forget to click here 
All Polish RBMPs were adopted on 22 February 2011 by the Council of Ministers and subsequently published in the official journal. They were all reported to the Commission in July 2011. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The current ecological status of surface water bodies is likely very bad status (only 3 % of water bodies are in good ecological status and 83 % are in unknown status) 
Don’t forget to click here 
The current ecological status of surface water bodies is likely very bad status (only 3 % of water bodies are in good ecological status and 83 % are in unknown status) 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Sweden 
Sweden has designated 5 river basin districts, out of which 3 are international sharing water courses with Norway to the west and Finland to the east and north.
RBMPs were adopted on 15-18 December 2009 and reported to the Commission on 19.3.2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
RBMPs were adopted on 15-18 December 2009 and reported to the Commission on 19.3.2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The current ecological status of surface water bodies is lower than status (more than 55 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 0 percentages are in unknown status). 
Don’t forget to click here 
The current ecological status of surface water bodies is lower than status (more than 55 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 0 percentages are in unknown status) 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Austria 
Austria has three river basin districts (Danube, Elbe, Rhine), all of which are international sharing water courses with Czech Republic to the north, Germany to the north-east, Slovakia and Hungary to the east, Switzerland and Liechtenstein to the west and Slovenia to the south.
Austria adopted its River Basin Management Plans (RBMP) for the Danube, Rhine and Elbe main River Basin Districts in March 2010 and reported additional information on these to the 
Commission in January 2012. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Austria adopted its River Basin Management Plans (RBMP) for the Danube, Rhine and Elbe main River Basin Districts in March 2010 and reported additional information on these to the Commission in January 2012. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Just 43.6 % of the natural surface water bodies of Austria have a high or good ecological status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Just 43.6 % of the natural surface water bodies of Austria have a high or good ecological status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: 
Bulgaria 
Bulgaria has 4 river basins, 3 of which are international sharing water courses with Greece and Turkey to the south, Romania to the north (Danube River is the border), Serbia and Former Yugoslavia Republic of Macedonia to the west and one national river basin - Black Sea RBD..
In Bulgaria the river basin management plans were adopted by an order of the Minister of Environment and Water dated March 22, 2010. 
A common strength for Bulgaria’s RBMPs is that the RBMPs are well structured and they present a good basis for further development in the next planning cycles. Significant efforts 
were made to secure the participation of the public in the process of development of the RBMP. 
Don’t forget to click here 
In Bulgaria the river basin management plans were adopted by an order of the Minister of Environment and Water dated March 22, 2010. 
A common strength for Bulgaria’s RBMPs is that the RBMPs are well structured and they present a good basis for further development in the next planning cycles. Significant efforts 
were made to secure the participation of the public in the process of development of the RBMP. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Almost 40 % of all surface water bodies in Bulgaria have been assessed as being at good ecological status and nearly 5% are at high status. One fourth of the surface water bodies are 
in poor or bad status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Almost 40 % of all surface water bodies in Bulgaria have been assessed as being at good ecological status and nearly 5% are at high status. One fourth of the surface water bodies are 
in poor or bad status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: 
Romania 
Romania has 1 river basin district, which has international sharing water courses with Serbia to the south- west, Bulgaria to the south, Hungary to the west, Ukraine to the north and Moldova to the north-east.
The Danube River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) 
was adopted by a Governmental Decision on 26/01/2011. The RBMP was reported to the Commission on 18/03/2011. 
A common strength for Romania’s RBMP is that it identifies the major sources of pollution and the monitoring programe 
is continuously adjusted. The RBMP was set up based on strong stakeholder involvement and good coordination at international level with EU Member States and third countries under the framework of the International Commission for the Protection of Danube River. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The Danube River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) 
was adopted by a Governmental Decision on 26/01/2011. The RBMP was reported to the Commission on 18/03/2011. 
A common strength for Romania’s RBMP is that it identifies the major sources of pollution and the monitoring programe 
is continuously adjusted. The RBMP was set up based on strong stakeholder involvement and good coordination at international level with EU Member States and third countries under the framework of the International Commission for the Protection of Danube River. 
Don’t forget to click here 
64% of all surface water bodies in Romania have been assessed as being at good or better ecological status. Only less than 2% of the surface water bodies are assessed as being of poor or bad ecological status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
64% of all surface water bodies in Romania have been assessed as being at good or better ecological status. 
Only less than 2% of the surface water bodies are assessed 
as being of poor or bad ecological status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Greece 
Greece has 14 river basin districts, out of which 5 are international sharing water courses with Albania, Macedonia and Bulgaria to the north and Turkey to the east.
Greece did not report any River Basin Management Plans in time for the 2012 Commission assessment. In 2013, 8 of the 14 RBMPs were adopted. The others are still pending. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Greece did not report any River Basin Management Plans in time for the 2012 Commission assessment. In 2013, 8 of the 14 RBMPs were adopted. The others are still pending. 
Don’t forget to click here 
No data because of the absence of River Basin Management Plans . 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Croatia 
Croatia has two river basin districts, both of which are international.
The Commission assessment of the Croatian River Basin Management Plans is ongoing. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The Commission assessment of the Croatian River Basin Management Plans is ongoing. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Honestly we don´t know because the River Basin Management Plans are available online only in Croatian! 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Hungary 
Hungary has 1 river basin district, which is an international water course - the Danube - shared with Slovakia to the north, Austria and Germany to the west, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova and Ukraine to the south and east.
The National River Basin Management Plan was adopted by the Hungarian Government on 21 May 2010. Due to formal legal mandate reasons the Governmental Decision was later repealed and the RBMP, with unchanged content, was newly adopted on 23 February 2012. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The National River Basin Management Plan was adopted by the Hungarian Government on 21 May 2010. Due to formal legal mandate reasons the Governmental Decision was later repealed and the RBMP, with unchanged content, was newly adopted on 23 February 2012. 
Don’t forget to click here 
11% of the surface water bodies are in good ecological status in Hungary. More than half of the surface water bodies are in less than good status, while the ecological status of one third of the river water bodies and of nearly two thirds of the lake water bodies is unknown. 
Don’t forget to click here 
11% of the surface water bodies are in good ecological status in Hungary. More than half of the surface water bodies are in less than good status, while the ecological status of one third of the river water bodies and of nearly two thirds of the lake water bodies is unknown. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Czech Republik 
The Czech Republic has 3 river basin districts, all of which are international sharing water courses with Poland to the north, Slovakia to the east, Austria to the south and Germany to the south-west and north-west.
RBMPs in the Czech Republic were prepared on three levels: A Plans –International RBMPs; B Plans –National RBMPs; C Plans –Sub-basin RBMPs. As well as the National RBMPs, International RBMPs and Sub- basin RBMPs were also adopted. 
Don’t forget to click here 
RBMPs in the Czech Republic were prepared on three levels: 
A Plans –International RBMPs; 
B Plans –National RBMPs; 
C Plans –Sub-basin RBMPs. 
As well as the National RBMPs, International RBMPs and Sub- basin RBMPs were also adopted. 
Don’t forget to click here 
More than 60% of the natural surface water bodies have a poor ecological status! About 20% have a good status and another 17% a moderate status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
More than 60% of the natural surface water bodies have a poor ecological status! About 20% have a good status and another 17% a moderate status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Slovenia 
Slovenia has 2 river basin districts, one of which is an international sharing water course with Austria to the north and Hungary to the East.
Slovenia prepared RBMPs for both RBDs as one document entitled 'The RBMP for Danube RBD and North Adriatic RBD 2009-2015' which was officially adopted on 27 July 2011, after the deadline indicated in WFD. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Slovenia prepared RBMPs for both RBDs as one document entitled 'The RBMP for Danube RBD and North Adriatic RBD 2009-2015' which was officially adopted on 27 July 2011, after the deadline indicated in WFD. 
Don’t forget to click here 
There are 132 surface water bodies delineated in Slovenia. More than half of all surface water bodies in Slovenia have been assessed as being at good ecological status and 8% are at high status. Only less than 7% of the surface water bodies are of poor or bad status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
There are 132 surface water bodies delineated in Slovenia. More than half of all surface water bodies in Slovenia have been assessed as being at good ecological status and 8% are at high status. Only less than 7% of the surface water bodies are of poor or bad status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Status of Implementation of the RBMP: 
Water Quality: 
Slovakia 
Slovakia has 2 river basin districts, both of which are international sharing water courses with Austria to the west, Poland and Czech Republic to the north and Hungary to the South.
The Slovakia reported one river basin management plan (RBMP) covering both, the Danube and the Vistula River Basin Districts. The RBMP was reported to the Commission on 
23 April 2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
The Slovakia reported one river basin management plan (RBMP) covering both, the Danube and the Vistula River Basin Districts. The RBMP was reported to the Commission on 
23 April 2010. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Over 50% of the natural surface water have a high or good ecological status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Over 50% of the natural surface water have a high or good ecological status. 
Don’t forget to click here 
Congratulations, you’re almost done… 
Please ask your instructor to send your score to the Big Jump: 
e-mail: info@bigjumpchallenge.net 
For additional information about the system of evaluation please click here 
Now that you know more about the general status of rivers in Europe, what about your own river, and that of your friends and partners? Go to module letter writing . . .
These Balkan countries are not part of the WFD, but . . . 
They also have rivers which need to be protected. 
In fact, some of the remaining wild rivers of Europe are currently at risk here! 
So we should not forget about these countries in the blue heart of Europe. 
For additional information please visit this website: 
http://www.balkanrivers.net/en/tags/campaign-events 
Don’t forget to click here 
Explanation of the assignment to a face symbol: Implementation: = complete RBMP was reported = incomplete RBMP was reported = RBMP not reported or the reported documents are not meeting the requirements Water quality: % of water bodies having a high or good ecological status = > 60% = 40-60% = <40% For additional information visit the website of the European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/participation/map_mc/map.htm 
Additional Information:

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

SPC Water Framework Directive_Final
SPC Water Framework Directive_FinalSPC Water Framework Directive_Final
SPC Water Framework Directive_FinalStephen Barry
 
Catchment Services - Connecting and progressing Water Framework Directive & B...
Catchment Services - Connecting and progressing Water Framework Directive & B...Catchment Services - Connecting and progressing Water Framework Directive & B...
Catchment Services - Connecting and progressing Water Framework Directive & B...Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland
 
Water framework directive and its enforcement in Venice Lagoon
Water framework directive and its enforcement in Venice LagoonWater framework directive and its enforcement in Venice Lagoon
Water framework directive and its enforcement in Venice Lagoonfrancesco loro
 
Digital Water - The Water Framework Directive data management and visualisati...
Digital Water - The Water Framework Directive data management and visualisati...Digital Water - The Water Framework Directive data management and visualisati...
Digital Water - The Water Framework Directive data management and visualisati...Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland
 
Farm Business Update 2014: Aylsham, EA and Water Framework Directive
Farm Business Update 2014: Aylsham, EA and Water Framework DirectiveFarm Business Update 2014: Aylsham, EA and Water Framework Directive
Farm Business Update 2014: Aylsham, EA and Water Framework DirectiveCLA - East
 
Farm Business Update 2014: Forest Centre, Environment Agency and Water Framew...
Farm Business Update 2014: Forest Centre, Environment Agency and Water Framew...Farm Business Update 2014: Forest Centre, Environment Agency and Water Framew...
Farm Business Update 2014: Forest Centre, Environment Agency and Water Framew...CLA - East
 
Farm Business Update 2014: Essex YFC, Environment Agency and Water Framework ...
Farm Business Update 2014: Essex YFC, Environment Agency and Water Framework ...Farm Business Update 2014: Essex YFC, Environment Agency and Water Framework ...
Farm Business Update 2014: Essex YFC, Environment Agency and Water Framework ...CLA - East
 
Farm Business Update 2014: Thetford, EA and Water Framework Directive
Farm Business Update 2014: Thetford, EA and Water Framework DirectiveFarm Business Update 2014: Thetford, EA and Water Framework Directive
Farm Business Update 2014: Thetford, EA and Water Framework DirectiveCLA - East
 

Viewers also liked (8)

SPC Water Framework Directive_Final
SPC Water Framework Directive_FinalSPC Water Framework Directive_Final
SPC Water Framework Directive_Final
 
Catchment Services - Connecting and progressing Water Framework Directive & B...
Catchment Services - Connecting and progressing Water Framework Directive & B...Catchment Services - Connecting and progressing Water Framework Directive & B...
Catchment Services - Connecting and progressing Water Framework Directive & B...
 
Water framework directive and its enforcement in Venice Lagoon
Water framework directive and its enforcement in Venice LagoonWater framework directive and its enforcement in Venice Lagoon
Water framework directive and its enforcement in Venice Lagoon
 
Digital Water - The Water Framework Directive data management and visualisati...
Digital Water - The Water Framework Directive data management and visualisati...Digital Water - The Water Framework Directive data management and visualisati...
Digital Water - The Water Framework Directive data management and visualisati...
 
Farm Business Update 2014: Aylsham, EA and Water Framework Directive
Farm Business Update 2014: Aylsham, EA and Water Framework DirectiveFarm Business Update 2014: Aylsham, EA and Water Framework Directive
Farm Business Update 2014: Aylsham, EA and Water Framework Directive
 
Farm Business Update 2014: Forest Centre, Environment Agency and Water Framew...
Farm Business Update 2014: Forest Centre, Environment Agency and Water Framew...Farm Business Update 2014: Forest Centre, Environment Agency and Water Framew...
Farm Business Update 2014: Forest Centre, Environment Agency and Water Framew...
 
Farm Business Update 2014: Essex YFC, Environment Agency and Water Framework ...
Farm Business Update 2014: Essex YFC, Environment Agency and Water Framework ...Farm Business Update 2014: Essex YFC, Environment Agency and Water Framework ...
Farm Business Update 2014: Essex YFC, Environment Agency and Water Framework ...
 
Farm Business Update 2014: Thetford, EA and Water Framework Directive
Farm Business Update 2014: Thetford, EA and Water Framework DirectiveFarm Business Update 2014: Thetford, EA and Water Framework Directive
Farm Business Update 2014: Thetford, EA and Water Framework Directive
 

Similar to Guess game water-framework-directive

Mr. Steven Visser IEWP @ Workshop on River Basin Management Planning and Gove...
Mr. Steven Visser IEWP @ Workshop on River Basin Management Planning and Gove...Mr. Steven Visser IEWP @ Workshop on River Basin Management Planning and Gove...
Mr. Steven Visser IEWP @ Workshop on River Basin Management Planning and Gove...India-EU Water Partnership
 
River basin management plans and results of public consultation in Lithuania
River basin management plans and results of public consultation in LithuaniaRiver basin management plans and results of public consultation in Lithuania
River basin management plans and results of public consultation in LithuaniaPomcert
 
2015 02 - paul parker
2015   02 - paul parker2015   02 - paul parker
2015 02 - paul parkerSevernEstuary
 
Felgate, Stacey: Pan-European monitoring of land-ocean-atmosphere carbon flux...
Felgate, Stacey: Pan-European monitoring of land-ocean-atmosphere carbon flux...Felgate, Stacey: Pan-European monitoring of land-ocean-atmosphere carbon flux...
Felgate, Stacey: Pan-European monitoring of land-ocean-atmosphere carbon flux...Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS)
 
3. ES Manage Project: Incorporation of Ecosystem Services Values into the Int...
3. ES Manage Project: Incorporation of Ecosystem Services Values into the Int...3. ES Manage Project: Incorporation of Ecosystem Services Values into the Int...
3. ES Manage Project: Incorporation of Ecosystem Services Values into the Int...Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland
 
Water accountingunep gpa
Water accountingunep gpaWater accountingunep gpa
Water accountingunep gpagiri venkatesan
 
Methodologies to Measure Nutrient Reduction and to Aggregate Results at the P...
Methodologies to Measure Nutrient Reduction and to Aggregate Results at the P...Methodologies to Measure Nutrient Reduction and to Aggregate Results at the P...
Methodologies to Measure Nutrient Reduction and to Aggregate Results at the P...Iwl Pcu
 
Key challenges and the Status of Water Reforms
Key challenges and the Status of Water ReformsKey challenges and the Status of Water Reforms
Key challenges and the Status of Water ReformsOECD Environment
 
Drinking water guidelines
Drinking water   guidelinesDrinking water   guidelines
Drinking water guidelinesBrian Dsilva
 
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...Iwl Pcu
 
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...Iwl Pcu
 
SLIPP All-Committee Meeting: Water Quality Update 12-April-2012
SLIPP All-Committee Meeting: Water Quality Update 12-April-2012SLIPP All-Committee Meeting: Water Quality Update 12-April-2012
SLIPP All-Committee Meeting: Water Quality Update 12-April-2012Erin Vieira
 
Glen Cooper Natural England
Glen Cooper Natural EnglandGlen Cooper Natural England
Glen Cooper Natural EnglandRebeccaSlack
 

Similar to Guess game water-framework-directive (20)

Mr. Steven Visser IEWP @ Workshop on River Basin Management Planning and Gove...
Mr. Steven Visser IEWP @ Workshop on River Basin Management Planning and Gove...Mr. Steven Visser IEWP @ Workshop on River Basin Management Planning and Gove...
Mr. Steven Visser IEWP @ Workshop on River Basin Management Planning and Gove...
 
Protecting and Managing Ireland’s Water Resources
Protecting and Managing Ireland’s Water ResourcesProtecting and Managing Ireland’s Water Resources
Protecting and Managing Ireland’s Water Resources
 
EPA Lake Monitoring Fact Sheet
EPA Lake Monitoring Fact SheetEPA Lake Monitoring Fact Sheet
EPA Lake Monitoring Fact Sheet
 
Ponencia de Sergiy Morov sobre la DMA
Ponencia de Sergiy Morov sobre la DMAPonencia de Sergiy Morov sobre la DMA
Ponencia de Sergiy Morov sobre la DMA
 
River basin management plans and results of public consultation in Lithuania
River basin management plans and results of public consultation in LithuaniaRiver basin management plans and results of public consultation in Lithuania
River basin management plans and results of public consultation in Lithuania
 
Water Acquis in the EU
Water Acquis in the EUWater Acquis in the EU
Water Acquis in the EU
 
2015 02 - paul parker
2015   02 - paul parker2015   02 - paul parker
2015 02 - paul parker
 
Felgate, Stacey: Pan-European monitoring of land-ocean-atmosphere carbon flux...
Felgate, Stacey: Pan-European monitoring of land-ocean-atmosphere carbon flux...Felgate, Stacey: Pan-European monitoring of land-ocean-atmosphere carbon flux...
Felgate, Stacey: Pan-European monitoring of land-ocean-atmosphere carbon flux...
 
3. ES Manage Project: Incorporation of Ecosystem Services Values into the Int...
3. ES Manage Project: Incorporation of Ecosystem Services Values into the Int...3. ES Manage Project: Incorporation of Ecosystem Services Values into the Int...
3. ES Manage Project: Incorporation of Ecosystem Services Values into the Int...
 
WaterAccountingUNEP-GPA.ppt
WaterAccountingUNEP-GPA.pptWaterAccountingUNEP-GPA.ppt
WaterAccountingUNEP-GPA.ppt
 
Water accountingunep gpa
Water accountingunep gpaWater accountingunep gpa
Water accountingunep gpa
 
Methodologies to Measure Nutrient Reduction and to Aggregate Results at the P...
Methodologies to Measure Nutrient Reduction and to Aggregate Results at the P...Methodologies to Measure Nutrient Reduction and to Aggregate Results at the P...
Methodologies to Measure Nutrient Reduction and to Aggregate Results at the P...
 
Key challenges and the Status of Water Reforms
Key challenges and the Status of Water ReformsKey challenges and the Status of Water Reforms
Key challenges and the Status of Water Reforms
 
Drinking water guidelines
Drinking water   guidelinesDrinking water   guidelines
Drinking water guidelines
 
1. Water quality and us - Andy Fanning, EPA
1. Water quality and us - Andy Fanning, EPA1. Water quality and us - Andy Fanning, EPA
1. Water quality and us - Andy Fanning, EPA
 
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
 
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Da...
 
2015 State of the Sound
2015 State of the Sound 2015 State of the Sound
2015 State of the Sound
 
SLIPP All-Committee Meeting: Water Quality Update 12-April-2012
SLIPP All-Committee Meeting: Water Quality Update 12-April-2012SLIPP All-Committee Meeting: Water Quality Update 12-April-2012
SLIPP All-Committee Meeting: Water Quality Update 12-April-2012
 
Glen Cooper Natural England
Glen Cooper Natural EnglandGlen Cooper Natural England
Glen Cooper Natural England
 

Recently uploaded

Powers of State Pollution Control Board - The Water Act 1974
Powers of State Pollution Control Board - The Water Act 1974Powers of State Pollution Control Board - The Water Act 1974
Powers of State Pollution Control Board - The Water Act 1974linciy03
 
LANDFILL AND ITS EFFECT(Managing waste).pptx
LANDFILL AND ITS EFFECT(Managing waste).pptxLANDFILL AND ITS EFFECT(Managing waste).pptx
LANDFILL AND ITS EFFECT(Managing waste).pptxKrish DS
 
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单tyvaq
 
Lecture 6- Bacteria- Pathathogenesis.ppt
Lecture 6- Bacteria- Pathathogenesis.pptLecture 6- Bacteria- Pathathogenesis.ppt
Lecture 6- Bacteria- Pathathogenesis.pptDiptiPriya6
 
Powers and Functions of CPCB - The Water Act 1974.pdf
Powers and Functions of CPCB - The Water Act 1974.pdfPowers and Functions of CPCB - The Water Act 1974.pdf
Powers and Functions of CPCB - The Water Act 1974.pdflinciy03
 
New Metrics for Sustainable Prosperity: Options for GDP+3 (preliminary study)
New Metrics for Sustainable Prosperity: Options for GDP+3 (preliminary study)New Metrics for Sustainable Prosperity: Options for GDP+3 (preliminary study)
New Metrics for Sustainable Prosperity: Options for GDP+3 (preliminary study)susannedejong
 
ecosystem class 12 ppt investigatory project
ecosystem class 12 ppt investigatory projectecosystem class 12 ppt investigatory project
ecosystem class 12 ppt investigatory projectMayank524181
 
一比一原版EUR毕业证鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版EUR毕业证鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学毕业证成绩单如何办理一比一原版EUR毕业证鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版EUR毕业证鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学毕业证成绩单如何办理exehay
 
The State Board for Water Pollution - The Water Act 1974 .pptx
The State Board for  Water Pollution - The Water Act 1974  .pptxThe State Board for  Water Pollution - The Water Act 1974  .pptx
The State Board for Water Pollution - The Water Act 1974 .pptxlinciy03
 
一比一原版(Monash毕业证)莫纳什大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Monash毕业证)莫纳什大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Monash毕业证)莫纳什大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Monash毕业证)莫纳什大学毕业证成绩单pcoow
 
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单qogbuux
 
Multiple choice Qs - Construction safety
Multiple choice Qs - Construction safetyMultiple choice Qs - Construction safety
Multiple choice Qs - Construction safetyAnilDamahe1
 
SUNDERBANS-a case study(E.V.S. PROJECT).pptx
SUNDERBANS-a case study(E.V.S. PROJECT).pptxSUNDERBANS-a case study(E.V.S. PROJECT).pptx
SUNDERBANS-a case study(E.V.S. PROJECT).pptxKrish DS
 
一比一原版(Southern Cross毕业证)南十字星大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Southern Cross毕业证)南十字星大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Southern Cross毕业证)南十字星大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Southern Cross毕业证)南十字星大学毕业证成绩单yegohah
 
WhatsUpp In... Alpine Region concerning Hydrogen Valleys - 16 mai 2024
WhatsUpp In... Alpine Region concerning Hydrogen Valleys - 16 mai 2024WhatsUpp In... Alpine Region concerning Hydrogen Valleys - 16 mai 2024
WhatsUpp In... Alpine Region concerning Hydrogen Valleys - 16 mai 2024Cluster H2O
 
LaPlace Transforms 2 with use of Matlab.pptx
LaPlace Transforms 2 with use of Matlab.pptxLaPlace Transforms 2 with use of Matlab.pptx
LaPlace Transforms 2 with use of Matlab.pptxjoshuaclack73
 
Climate change Presentation for students who need it
Climate change Presentation for students who need itClimate change Presentation for students who need it
Climate change Presentation for students who need itmaythadar1312
 
Use of Raffias’ species (Raphia spp.) and its impact on socioeconomic charact...
Use of Raffias’ species (Raphia spp.) and its impact on socioeconomic charact...Use of Raffias’ species (Raphia spp.) and its impact on socioeconomic charact...
Use of Raffias’ species (Raphia spp.) and its impact on socioeconomic charact...Open Access Research Paper
 
一比一原版(SUT毕业证)斯威本科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(SUT毕业证)斯威本科技大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(SUT毕业证)斯威本科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(SUT毕业证)斯威本科技大学毕业证成绩单pcoow
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Powers of State Pollution Control Board - The Water Act 1974
Powers of State Pollution Control Board - The Water Act 1974Powers of State Pollution Control Board - The Water Act 1974
Powers of State Pollution Control Board - The Water Act 1974
 
LANDFILL AND ITS EFFECT(Managing waste).pptx
LANDFILL AND ITS EFFECT(Managing waste).pptxLANDFILL AND ITS EFFECT(Managing waste).pptx
LANDFILL AND ITS EFFECT(Managing waste).pptx
 
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单
 
Lecture 6- Bacteria- Pathathogenesis.ppt
Lecture 6- Bacteria- Pathathogenesis.pptLecture 6- Bacteria- Pathathogenesis.ppt
Lecture 6- Bacteria- Pathathogenesis.ppt
 
Powers and Functions of CPCB - The Water Act 1974.pdf
Powers and Functions of CPCB - The Water Act 1974.pdfPowers and Functions of CPCB - The Water Act 1974.pdf
Powers and Functions of CPCB - The Water Act 1974.pdf
 
New Metrics for Sustainable Prosperity: Options for GDP+3 (preliminary study)
New Metrics for Sustainable Prosperity: Options for GDP+3 (preliminary study)New Metrics for Sustainable Prosperity: Options for GDP+3 (preliminary study)
New Metrics for Sustainable Prosperity: Options for GDP+3 (preliminary study)
 
ecosystem class 12 ppt investigatory project
ecosystem class 12 ppt investigatory projectecosystem class 12 ppt investigatory project
ecosystem class 12 ppt investigatory project
 
一比一原版EUR毕业证鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版EUR毕业证鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学毕业证成绩单如何办理一比一原版EUR毕业证鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版EUR毕业证鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
 
The State Board for Water Pollution - The Water Act 1974 .pptx
The State Board for  Water Pollution - The Water Act 1974  .pptxThe State Board for  Water Pollution - The Water Act 1974  .pptx
The State Board for Water Pollution - The Water Act 1974 .pptx
 
一比一原版(Monash毕业证)莫纳什大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Monash毕业证)莫纳什大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Monash毕业证)莫纳什大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Monash毕业证)莫纳什大学毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
 
Multiple choice Qs - Construction safety
Multiple choice Qs - Construction safetyMultiple choice Qs - Construction safety
Multiple choice Qs - Construction safety
 
SUNDERBANS-a case study(E.V.S. PROJECT).pptx
SUNDERBANS-a case study(E.V.S. PROJECT).pptxSUNDERBANS-a case study(E.V.S. PROJECT).pptx
SUNDERBANS-a case study(E.V.S. PROJECT).pptx
 
一比一原版(Southern Cross毕业证)南十字星大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Southern Cross毕业证)南十字星大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Southern Cross毕业证)南十字星大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Southern Cross毕业证)南十字星大学毕业证成绩单
 
WhatsUpp In... Alpine Region concerning Hydrogen Valleys - 16 mai 2024
WhatsUpp In... Alpine Region concerning Hydrogen Valleys - 16 mai 2024WhatsUpp In... Alpine Region concerning Hydrogen Valleys - 16 mai 2024
WhatsUpp In... Alpine Region concerning Hydrogen Valleys - 16 mai 2024
 
LaPlace Transforms 2 with use of Matlab.pptx
LaPlace Transforms 2 with use of Matlab.pptxLaPlace Transforms 2 with use of Matlab.pptx
LaPlace Transforms 2 with use of Matlab.pptx
 
Climate change Presentation for students who need it
Climate change Presentation for students who need itClimate change Presentation for students who need it
Climate change Presentation for students who need it
 
A systematic review of the implementation of Industry 4.0 in human resources
A systematic review of the implementation of Industry 4.0 in human resourcesA systematic review of the implementation of Industry 4.0 in human resources
A systematic review of the implementation of Industry 4.0 in human resources
 
Use of Raffias’ species (Raphia spp.) and its impact on socioeconomic charact...
Use of Raffias’ species (Raphia spp.) and its impact on socioeconomic charact...Use of Raffias’ species (Raphia spp.) and its impact on socioeconomic charact...
Use of Raffias’ species (Raphia spp.) and its impact on socioeconomic charact...
 
一比一原版(SUT毕业证)斯威本科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(SUT毕业证)斯威本科技大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(SUT毕业证)斯威本科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(SUT毕业证)斯威本科技大学毕业证成绩单
 

Guess game water-framework-directive

  • 1. River Basin Management Plans Click here to start
  • 2. In general it is about the Water Framework Directive. You have already heard about WFD? Great! If not, here is some information: The WFD aims to unify the European water policy by providing a framework for the protection of surface water, coastal and transitional waters as well as for groundwater. Goal: A good ecological and chemical status of European surface waters and groundwater . What is the game about?
  • 3. Implementation of the WFD 2003 Implementation in national law 2004 Inventory 2006 Monitoring 2009 Establishment and Publishing of River Basin Management Plans 2012 Implementation of River Basin Management Plans 2015 Achievement of goals Steps to take until the year 2015
  • 4. River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) What is it? Plans are a requirement of the Water Framework Directive and a means of achieving the protection, improvement and sustainable use of the water environment across Europe. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Basin_Management_Plans) Some countries in Europe have already completed these plans, however some are still not completed. By the way, the deadline for submitting the RBMPs was in 2009 . . .!
  • 5. How well do you know the water bodies in Europe and the status of implementation of the RBMPs? ...let’s find out.
  • 6. Let’s get some basics down: We will use these symbols to represent the current status of implementation and the quality of water: Good Moderate Poor and Bad Make sure you keep track of your points during the game. If you get it right, you will get 3 points, and if you get it wrong, you get -1 point. Always click on the “ ” button to return to the map. Once you finished all countries click Good luck!
  • 7. Explanation of the assignment to a face symbol: Implementation: = complete RBMP was reported = incomplete RBMP was reported = RBMP not reported or the reported documents are not meeting the requirements Water quality: % of water bodies having a high or good ecological status = > 60% = 40-60% = <40% For additional information visit the website of the European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/participation/map_mc/map.htm Additional Information:
  • 8. Select a country to begin the quiz! UK Denmark Ireland Germany Spain Portugal Italy Finland Estonia Latvia Lithuania Poland France Sweden Norway Austria Netherland Belgium Greece Bulgaria Romania Croatia Slovenia Slovakia Hungary Czech Republik Macedonia Serbia Albania Bosnia and Herzegovina Iceland Belarus
  • 9. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: The United Kingdom The UK has identified 16 river basin districts. There are 11 in England and Wales, 3 in Scotland and 4 in Northern Ireland (including 3 international RBDs). One river basin district, Solway Tweed, is in both England and Scotland.
  • 10. The consultation process is completed. The UK has done a great job so far in following the direction of the River Basin Management Plans. They have been very compliant and have provided detailed information on the water bodies in the UK. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 11. The consultation process is completed. The UK has done a great job so far in following the direction of the River Basin Management Plans. They have been very compliant and have provided detailed information on the water bodies in the UK. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 12. In England and Wales about 40% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. Assessment methods for the classification of ecological status are fully developed for all biological quality elements in river and coastal waters, but are not developed for fish in lakes. Phytoplankton has not been developed for transitional waters across the UK. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 13. In England and Wales about 40% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. Assessment methods for the classification of ecological status are fully developed for all biological quality elements in river and coastal waters, but are not developed for fish in lakes. Phytoplankton has not been developed for transitional waters across the UK. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 14. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Denmark Denmark has four river basin districts (River Basin District I : Jylland and Fyn, River Basin District 2 : Sjaelland, River Basin District 3 : Bornholm, River Basin District 4 : International RBD ).
  • 15. Denmark takes a narrow approach to water services. The polluter pays principle is applied for wastewater treatment and water supply with 100 % of the funding of the service provided by users, but there is no information about cost recovery for other water services (e.g. for water used for irrigation and directly abstracted from the source by farmers). Don’t forget to click here 
  • 16. Denmark takes a narrow approach to water services. The polluter pays principle is applied for wastewater treatment and water supply with 100 % of the funding of the service provided by users, but there is no information about cost recovery for other water services (e.g. for water used for irrigation and directly abstracted from the source by farmers). Don’t forget to click here 
  • 17. In Denmark less than 30% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. It has a national approach to the assessment of ecological status. Comparison between the RBMPs and the 2009 WFD implementation report for Danish methods shows that fewer methods are available now, however Danish authorities have clarified that new assessment methods are in development. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 18. In Denmark less than 30% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. It has a national approach to the assessment of ecological status. Comparison between the RBMPs and the 2009 WFD implementation report for Danish methods shows that fewer methods are available now, however Danish authorities have clarified that new assessment methods are in development. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 19. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Ireland Ireland has 7 river basin districts, out of which 3 are international RBDs and sharing water courses with Northern Ireland.
  • 20. The RBMPs were adopted on 6 July 2010. Discussions are underway to change the administrative arrangements. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 21. Don’t forget to click here  The RBMPs were adopted on 6 July 2010. Discussions are underway to change the administrative arrangements.
  • 22. Over 50% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. A method for assessing acidification status using macroinvertebrates in lakes will be adopted and a method for trophic status using macroinvertebrates is still in development. It is not clear if methods for phytoplankton and benthic invertebrates in transitional waters will be developed Don’t forget to click here 
  • 23. Over 50% of the water bodies have a good or high ecological status. A method for assessing acidification status using macroinvertebrates in lakes will be adopted and a method for trophic status using macroinvertebrates is still in development. It is not clear if methods for phytoplankton and benthic invertebrates in transitional waters will be developed Don’t forget to click here 
  • 24. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Germany Germany has 10 river basin districts, 6 of which are international sharing water courses with Denmark to the north, Poland and Czech Republic to the east, Austria, Switzerland and France to the south and southeast and Luxembourg, Belgium and the Netherlands to the west.
  • 25. Some Länder worked together to submit one plan, while other Länder produced individual plans for the same basin, sometimes to varying degrees of detail. The result of these differences is only a patchwork of information on how the WFD is being implemented. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 26. Don’t forget to click here  Some Länder worked together to submit one plan, while other Länder produced individual plans for the same basin, sometimes to varying degree of detail. The result of these differences is only a patchwork of information on how the WFD is being implemented.
  • 27. There was noticeable improvement when the situation on ecological assessment methods available for Germany in 2007 was compared to the assessment methods reported in all available DE RBMPs. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 28. There was noticeable improvement when the situation on ecological assessment methods available for Germany in 2007 was compared to the assessment methods reported in all available DE RBMPs. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 29. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Spain Spain has 25 river basin districts, 6 of which are international sharing water courses with France to the northeast and Portugal to the west.
  • 30. With the exception of the River Basin District of Distrito Fluvial de Catalonia (ES100), Spain has not reported RBMPs to the Commission. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 31. Don’t forget to click here  With the exception of the River Basin District of Distrito Fluvial de Catalonia (ES100), Spain has not reported RBMPs to the Commission.
  • 32. Assessment methods are reported to be fully developed for all biological quality elements in lakes and transitional water, however, it is not clear if this is the case. Assessment methods are partly developed for biological quality elements for all or some in rivers and coastal waters. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 33. Assessment methods are reported to be fully developed for all biological quality elements in lakes and transitional water, however, it is not clear if this is the case. Assessment methods are partly developed for biological quality elements for all or some in rivers and coastal waters. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 34. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Belgium Belgium belongs to 4 international river basin districts sharing water courses with the Netherlands, France, Luxemburg and Germany.
  • 35. Only the two RBMPs of the Flemish Region and the Federal plan on the coastal waters have been adopted and reported. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 36. Don’t forget to click here  Only the two RBMPs of the Flemish Region and the Federal plan on the coastal waters have been adopted and reported.
  • 37. 80% of the natural surface water bodies of Belgium have a poor or bad ecological status! The other 20% have a moderate status. Regarding the supporting elements for the biological assessment, class boundaries have been set for physico- chemical quality elements although it is not clear from the RBMP how these are related to the BQE classes. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 38. 80% of the natural surface water bodies of Belgium have a poor or bad ecological status! The other 20% have a moderate status. Regarding the supporting elements for the biological assessment, class boundaries have been set for physico- chemical quality elements although it is not clear from the RBMP how these are related to the BQE classes. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 39. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Portugal Portugal has 10 river basin districts (8 in mainland Portugal, 1 in the Azores archipelago and 1 in Madeira archipelago), 4 of which (Minho, Douro, Tejo and Guadiana) are international sharing water courses with Spain.
  • 40. Portugal has not reported RBMPs to the Commission. All the 8 RBMPs of Continental Portugal, and the RBMP of the Azores started Public Consultation in the second semester of 2011. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 41. Don’t forget to click here  Portugal has not reported RBMPs to the Commission. All the 8 RBMPs of Continental Portugal, and the RBMP of the Azores started Public Consultation in the second semester of 2011.
  • 42. A court ruling has been issued against Portugal by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the failure to adopt and report River Basin Management Plans for all of their respective River Basin Districts. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 43. A court ruling has been issued against Portugal by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the failure to adopt and report River Basin Management Plans for all of their respective River Basin Districts. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 44. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: The Netherlands The Netherlands have 4 river basin districts, all of which are international sharing water courses with Belgium, France, Luxemburg, Germany.
  • 45. In the Netherlands, the WFD River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) were adopted by the government on the 27 November 2009. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 46. Don’t forget to click here  In the Netherlands, the WFD River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) were adopted by the government on the 27 November 2009.
  • 47. 66.7% of the natural surface water bodies of the Netherlands have moderate ecological status! None of the water bodies have a good or high status nor a bad one. Almost a third are unknown! Don’t forget to click here 
  • 48. 66.7% of the natural surface water bodies of the Netherlands have moderate ecological status! None of the water bodies have a good or high status nor a bad one. Almost a third are unknown! Don’t forget to click here 
  • 49. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Italy Italy has 8 river basin districts, 2 of which are international sharing water courses with France to the west, Switzerland and Austria to the north and Slovenia to the east.
  • 50. In Italy, each RBMP was adopted by the ‘permanent institutional conference’ of the RBD Authority on 24 February 2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 51. Don’t forget to click here  In Italy, each RBMP was adopted by the ‘permanent institutional conference’ of the RBD Authority on 24 February 2010.
  • 52. Many RBMPs refer instead to the use of indices established under previous Italian legislation to determine ecological status: in particular, the SECA (Stato ecologico dei corsi d’acqua, ecological status of waterways), mainly for river water bodies, which uses benthic macro-invertebrates as well as physico-chemical elements. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 53. Many RBMPs refer instead to the use of indices established under previous Italian legislation to determine ecological status: in particular, the SECA (Stato ecologico dei corsi d’acqua, ecological status of waterways), mainly for river water bodies, which uses benthic macro-invertebrates as well as physico-chemical elements. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 54. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Finland Finland has 8 river basin districts, out of which 2 are international sharing water courses with Sweden to the west and Norway to the north. The Åland islands is one river basin district, with separate legislation and implementation.
  • 55. All Finnish RBMPs were published on 10.12.2009, and reported to the Commission on 19.03.2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 56. All Finnish RBMPs were published on 10.12.2009, and reported to the Commission on 19.03.2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 57. The ecological status of natural water bodies is to a relatively large extent unknown, with up to 81.7 % of all water bodies in a northern RBDs like Oulujoki_Iijoki (FIVHA4). Ecological potential in heavily modified water bodies are relatively better assessed, but also here the more northern RBD area subject to a higher degree of uncertainty. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 58. The ecological status of natural water bodies is to a relatively large extent unknown, with up to 81.7 % of all water bodies in a northern RBDs like Oulujoki_Iijoki (FIVHA4). Ecological potential in heavily modified water bodies are relatively better assessed, but also here the more northern RBD area subject to a higher degree of uncertainty. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 59. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Estonia Estonia has 3 river basin districts, out of which 2 are international sharing water courses with Russia to the east and Latvia to the south.
  • 60. RBMPs for East-Estonia, West-Estonia and Koiva river basins were adopted by the Government on 1 April 2010. Updated information was reported in November 2012 and April 2011. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 61. RBMPs for East-Estonia, West-Estonia and Koiva river basins were adopted by the Government on 1 April 2010. Updated information was reported in November 2012 and April 2011. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 62. The ecological status of natural water bodies is fully known ; more than 70 % of all water bodies are in a high or good ecological status and 0% in a bad status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 63. The ecological status of natural water bodies is fully known ; more than 70 % of all water bodies are in a high or good ecological status and 0% in a bad status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 64. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: France France has identified 12 river basin districts, out of which 4 are overseas territories. Among the remaining 8, 6 have a land border with another European country, Belgium, Luxemburg, Germany, Switzerland, Italy or Spain.
  • 65. In France, the River Basin Management Plans, called SDAGE (Schéma Directeur d'Aménagement et de Gestion des Eaux) were adopted in December 2009. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 66. In France, the River Basin Management Plans, called SDAGE (Schéma Directeur d'Aménagement et de Gestion des Eaux) were adopted in December 2009. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 67. Almost 35% of surface water bodies have been assessed as being in good ecological status, and 6.5% as being in high ecological status. However, 56.4% of surface water bodies are considered to be in less than good status (almost 40% in moderate, 12.5% in poor and just over 4% in bad status). There are just over 2% of French surface water bodies in unknown ecological status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 68. Almost 35% of surface water bodies have been assessed as being in good ecological status, and 6.5% as being in high ecological status. However, 56.4% of surface water bodies are considered to be in less than good status (almost 40% in moderate, 12.5% in poor and just over 4% in bad status). There are just over 2% of French surface water bodies in unknown ecological status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 69. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Lithuania Lithuania has 4 river basin districts, all of which are international. Nemuno RBD shares water courses with Byelorussia, Kaliningrad (Russia) and Poland. The other 3 - Dauguvos, Ventos and Lielupės - RBDs share water courses with Latvia.
  • 70. The Nemunas RBMP and PoM were adopted by Government July 2010. The Lielupe, Venta and Dauguva RBMPs and PoMs were adopted by Government 17 November 2010. The RBMPs were reported to the Commission in two stages, whereby the last 3 RBMPs were reported in November 2010. Updates were provided to WISE until January 2011 and in January 2012. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 71. The Nemunas RBMP and PoM were adopted by Government July 2010. The Lielupe, Venta and Dauguva RBMPs and PoMs were adopted by Government 17 November 2010. The RBMPs were reported to the Commission in two stages, whereby the last 3 RBMPs were reported in November 2010. Updates were provided to WISE until January 2011 and in January 2012. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 72. The current ecological status or ecological potential is lower than good (more than 50 % of water bodies are in good ecological status and 0.4 % are in unknown status). Don’t forget to click here 
  • 73. Still needs to be changed: The current ecological status or ecological potential is lower than good (more than 50 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 0.4 percentages are in unknown status Don’t forget to click here 
  • 74. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Latvia Latvia has 4 river basin districts, all of them are international sharing water courses – with Lithuania to the south, Byelorussia and Russia to the east and Estonia to the north.
  • 75. The final version of the River basin district management plans was approved by the Order of the Minister of Environment on 6 May 2010. The RBMPs were reported to the Commission on 18 May 2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 76. The final version of the River basin district management plans was approved by the Order of the Minister of Environment on 6 May 2010. The RBMPs were reported to the Commission on 18 May 2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 77. 51% of the Latvian surface water bodies and almost all groundwater bodies are classified as having good or high status. Despite the shortcomings of the monitoring program and surface waters classification system the assessment correctly reflects the real situation. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 78. 51% of the Latvian surface water bodies and almost all groundwater bodies are classified as having good or high status. Despite the shortcomings of the monitoring program and surface waters classification system the assessment correctly reflects the real situation. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 79. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Norway Norway has 9 river basin districts, out of which 5 are international sharing water courses with Sweden, Finland and Russia to the east.
  • 80. Norway transposed the Water Framework Directive (WFD) into national legislation (the Water Regulation) in January 2007, and performed a voluntary implementation of the WFD in selected sub-districts across the country from 2007 until 2009, thus gaining experience of river basin management planning and enabling Norway to take part in the sharing of experiences in the Common Implementation Strategy. Pilot River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) for the selected pilot sub-districts were adopted by the regional County Councils in 2009, and approved by the national Government in June 2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 81. Norway transposed the Water Framework Directive (WFD) into national legislation (the Water Regulation) in January 2007, and performed a voluntary implementation of the WFD in selected sub-districts across the country from 2007 until 2009, thus gaining experience of river basin management planning and enabling Norway to take part in the sharing of experiences in the Common Implementation Strategy. Pilot River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) for the selected pilot sub-districts were adopted by the regional County Councils in 2009, and approved by the national Government in June 2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 82. The current ecological status or ecological potential is lower than good (more than 40 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 20 percentages are in unknown status). Don’t forget to click here 
  • 83. The current ecological status or ecological potential is lower than good (more than 40 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 20 percentages are in unknown status) Don’t forget to click here 
  • 84. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Poland Poland has 10 river basin districts, out of which 8 are international sharing water courses with Russia to the north, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine to the east, Slovakia and Czech Republic to the south and Germany to the west.
  • 85. All Polish RBMPs were adopted on 22 February 2011 by the Council of Ministers and subsequently published in the official journal. They were all reported to the Commission in July 2011. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 86. All Polish RBMPs were adopted on 22 February 2011 by the Council of Ministers and subsequently published in the official journal. They were all reported to the Commission in July 2011. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 87. The current ecological status of surface water bodies is likely very bad status (only 3 % of water bodies are in good ecological status and 83 % are in unknown status) Don’t forget to click here 
  • 88. The current ecological status of surface water bodies is likely very bad status (only 3 % of water bodies are in good ecological status and 83 % are in unknown status) Don’t forget to click here 
  • 89. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Sweden Sweden has designated 5 river basin districts, out of which 3 are international sharing water courses with Norway to the west and Finland to the east and north.
  • 90. RBMPs were adopted on 15-18 December 2009 and reported to the Commission on 19.3.2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 91. RBMPs were adopted on 15-18 December 2009 and reported to the Commission on 19.3.2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 92. The current ecological status of surface water bodies is lower than status (more than 55 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 0 percentages are in unknown status). Don’t forget to click here 
  • 93. The current ecological status of surface water bodies is lower than status (more than 55 percentage of water bodies are in good ecological status and 0 percentages are in unknown status) Don’t forget to click here 
  • 94. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Austria Austria has three river basin districts (Danube, Elbe, Rhine), all of which are international sharing water courses with Czech Republic to the north, Germany to the north-east, Slovakia and Hungary to the east, Switzerland and Liechtenstein to the west and Slovenia to the south.
  • 95. Austria adopted its River Basin Management Plans (RBMP) for the Danube, Rhine and Elbe main River Basin Districts in March 2010 and reported additional information on these to the Commission in January 2012. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 96. Austria adopted its River Basin Management Plans (RBMP) for the Danube, Rhine and Elbe main River Basin Districts in March 2010 and reported additional information on these to the Commission in January 2012. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 97. Just 43.6 % of the natural surface water bodies of Austria have a high or good ecological status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 98. Just 43.6 % of the natural surface water bodies of Austria have a high or good ecological status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 99. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Bulgaria Bulgaria has 4 river basins, 3 of which are international sharing water courses with Greece and Turkey to the south, Romania to the north (Danube River is the border), Serbia and Former Yugoslavia Republic of Macedonia to the west and one national river basin - Black Sea RBD..
  • 100. In Bulgaria the river basin management plans were adopted by an order of the Minister of Environment and Water dated March 22, 2010. A common strength for Bulgaria’s RBMPs is that the RBMPs are well structured and they present a good basis for further development in the next planning cycles. Significant efforts were made to secure the participation of the public in the process of development of the RBMP. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 101. In Bulgaria the river basin management plans were adopted by an order of the Minister of Environment and Water dated March 22, 2010. A common strength for Bulgaria’s RBMPs is that the RBMPs are well structured and they present a good basis for further development in the next planning cycles. Significant efforts were made to secure the participation of the public in the process of development of the RBMP. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 102. Almost 40 % of all surface water bodies in Bulgaria have been assessed as being at good ecological status and nearly 5% are at high status. One fourth of the surface water bodies are in poor or bad status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 103. Almost 40 % of all surface water bodies in Bulgaria have been assessed as being at good ecological status and nearly 5% are at high status. One fourth of the surface water bodies are in poor or bad status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 104. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Romania Romania has 1 river basin district, which has international sharing water courses with Serbia to the south- west, Bulgaria to the south, Hungary to the west, Ukraine to the north and Moldova to the north-east.
  • 105. The Danube River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) was adopted by a Governmental Decision on 26/01/2011. The RBMP was reported to the Commission on 18/03/2011. A common strength for Romania’s RBMP is that it identifies the major sources of pollution and the monitoring programe is continuously adjusted. The RBMP was set up based on strong stakeholder involvement and good coordination at international level with EU Member States and third countries under the framework of the International Commission for the Protection of Danube River. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 106. The Danube River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) was adopted by a Governmental Decision on 26/01/2011. The RBMP was reported to the Commission on 18/03/2011. A common strength for Romania’s RBMP is that it identifies the major sources of pollution and the monitoring programe is continuously adjusted. The RBMP was set up based on strong stakeholder involvement and good coordination at international level with EU Member States and third countries under the framework of the International Commission for the Protection of Danube River. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 107. 64% of all surface water bodies in Romania have been assessed as being at good or better ecological status. Only less than 2% of the surface water bodies are assessed as being of poor or bad ecological status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 108. 64% of all surface water bodies in Romania have been assessed as being at good or better ecological status. Only less than 2% of the surface water bodies are assessed as being of poor or bad ecological status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 109. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Greece Greece has 14 river basin districts, out of which 5 are international sharing water courses with Albania, Macedonia and Bulgaria to the north and Turkey to the east.
  • 110. Greece did not report any River Basin Management Plans in time for the 2012 Commission assessment. In 2013, 8 of the 14 RBMPs were adopted. The others are still pending. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 111. Greece did not report any River Basin Management Plans in time for the 2012 Commission assessment. In 2013, 8 of the 14 RBMPs were adopted. The others are still pending. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 112. No data because of the absence of River Basin Management Plans . Don’t forget to click here 
  • 113. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Croatia Croatia has two river basin districts, both of which are international.
  • 114. The Commission assessment of the Croatian River Basin Management Plans is ongoing. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 115. The Commission assessment of the Croatian River Basin Management Plans is ongoing. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 116. Honestly we don´t know because the River Basin Management Plans are available online only in Croatian! Don’t forget to click here 
  • 117. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Hungary Hungary has 1 river basin district, which is an international water course - the Danube - shared with Slovakia to the north, Austria and Germany to the west, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova and Ukraine to the south and east.
  • 118. The National River Basin Management Plan was adopted by the Hungarian Government on 21 May 2010. Due to formal legal mandate reasons the Governmental Decision was later repealed and the RBMP, with unchanged content, was newly adopted on 23 February 2012. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 119. The National River Basin Management Plan was adopted by the Hungarian Government on 21 May 2010. Due to formal legal mandate reasons the Governmental Decision was later repealed and the RBMP, with unchanged content, was newly adopted on 23 February 2012. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 120. 11% of the surface water bodies are in good ecological status in Hungary. More than half of the surface water bodies are in less than good status, while the ecological status of one third of the river water bodies and of nearly two thirds of the lake water bodies is unknown. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 121. 11% of the surface water bodies are in good ecological status in Hungary. More than half of the surface water bodies are in less than good status, while the ecological status of one third of the river water bodies and of nearly two thirds of the lake water bodies is unknown. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 122. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Czech Republik The Czech Republic has 3 river basin districts, all of which are international sharing water courses with Poland to the north, Slovakia to the east, Austria to the south and Germany to the south-west and north-west.
  • 123. RBMPs in the Czech Republic were prepared on three levels: A Plans –International RBMPs; B Plans –National RBMPs; C Plans –Sub-basin RBMPs. As well as the National RBMPs, International RBMPs and Sub- basin RBMPs were also adopted. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 124. RBMPs in the Czech Republic were prepared on three levels: A Plans –International RBMPs; B Plans –National RBMPs; C Plans –Sub-basin RBMPs. As well as the National RBMPs, International RBMPs and Sub- basin RBMPs were also adopted. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 125. More than 60% of the natural surface water bodies have a poor ecological status! About 20% have a good status and another 17% a moderate status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 126. More than 60% of the natural surface water bodies have a poor ecological status! About 20% have a good status and another 17% a moderate status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 127. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Slovenia Slovenia has 2 river basin districts, one of which is an international sharing water course with Austria to the north and Hungary to the East.
  • 128. Slovenia prepared RBMPs for both RBDs as one document entitled 'The RBMP for Danube RBD and North Adriatic RBD 2009-2015' which was officially adopted on 27 July 2011, after the deadline indicated in WFD. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 129. Slovenia prepared RBMPs for both RBDs as one document entitled 'The RBMP for Danube RBD and North Adriatic RBD 2009-2015' which was officially adopted on 27 July 2011, after the deadline indicated in WFD. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 130. There are 132 surface water bodies delineated in Slovenia. More than half of all surface water bodies in Slovenia have been assessed as being at good ecological status and 8% are at high status. Only less than 7% of the surface water bodies are of poor or bad status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 131. There are 132 surface water bodies delineated in Slovenia. More than half of all surface water bodies in Slovenia have been assessed as being at good ecological status and 8% are at high status. Only less than 7% of the surface water bodies are of poor or bad status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 132. Status of Implementation of the RBMP: Water Quality: Slovakia Slovakia has 2 river basin districts, both of which are international sharing water courses with Austria to the west, Poland and Czech Republic to the north and Hungary to the South.
  • 133. The Slovakia reported one river basin management plan (RBMP) covering both, the Danube and the Vistula River Basin Districts. The RBMP was reported to the Commission on 23 April 2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 134. The Slovakia reported one river basin management plan (RBMP) covering both, the Danube and the Vistula River Basin Districts. The RBMP was reported to the Commission on 23 April 2010. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 135. Over 50% of the natural surface water have a high or good ecological status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 136. Over 50% of the natural surface water have a high or good ecological status. Don’t forget to click here 
  • 137. Congratulations, you’re almost done… Please ask your instructor to send your score to the Big Jump: e-mail: info@bigjumpchallenge.net For additional information about the system of evaluation please click here Now that you know more about the general status of rivers in Europe, what about your own river, and that of your friends and partners? Go to module letter writing . . .
  • 138. These Balkan countries are not part of the WFD, but . . . They also have rivers which need to be protected. In fact, some of the remaining wild rivers of Europe are currently at risk here! So we should not forget about these countries in the blue heart of Europe. For additional information please visit this website: http://www.balkanrivers.net/en/tags/campaign-events Don’t forget to click here 
  • 139. Explanation of the assignment to a face symbol: Implementation: = complete RBMP was reported = incomplete RBMP was reported = RBMP not reported or the reported documents are not meeting the requirements Water quality: % of water bodies having a high or good ecological status = > 60% = 40-60% = <40% For additional information visit the website of the European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/participation/map_mc/map.htm Additional Information: