SlideShare a Scribd company logo
HE BELIEVES HE IS SO BRILLENT BUT IS SO FOOLISH Charles e Whisnant  Romans 1:22 Man is held responsible by God because he should know better than to throw out the only absolute truth he has obtainable to him.  God, in His justice, demands that man face the consequence of his sin and rebellion.   Romans 1:18 says…. That is the bad news Paul gives us before he presents the good news First the danger, then the deliverer First the judgment, then the way of escape First the condemnation, then the forgiveness First the guilt, then the grace The whole message of forgiveness through the redeeming grace and love of God manifested for us by Christ on the cross, is based upon the conjecture that we under stand that man is truly guilty of disposing  of God’s truth.    We must understand that God’s perfect character demands that He react to sin in wrath. He who is total perfect and holy cannot pay no attention to sin, which violates his utter holiness. THE FOUR REASONS THAT GOD’S ANGER IS JUSTIFIED, BEING THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE OF A HOLY GOD TO SIN. ,[object Object]
REJECTIONrefuse
RATIONALIZATIONenlightenment
RELIGIONreligious convictionNo. 3RATIONALATIONAL ,[object Object],“Professing themselves to be wise, they become fools.” Romans 1:22 .Pilate asked Jesus “What Is Truth?”  John 18:38.   Why Truth & Things? Truth = Reality, the Real State of Affairs. Things = Something that Exists, a Matter to be Dealt with.  
Truth
 in a biblical sense is the reliable message of God.  
Things
 is a broad enough category to include a wide range of topics, from theology and cultural trends to the baffling subject of UFOs.  Therefore, Truth & Things is an attempt to understand the Scriptures and then allow them to provide a framework for thinking and living in the real world. Let us expand on this idea a little  The Quest for Truth TRUTH ,[object Object]
Surrounded by so many conflicting ideas and philosophies, is there anything that is genuinely and universally true? The Bible answers in the affirmative. Yes, there is truth, and it is available to all who will have it.BIBLICAL TRUTH  ,[object Object]
In Jesus of Nazareth, God has become incarnate. The God of truth has come to live among us and unveil His divine plan. Since Jesus is “the truth” (John 14:6), it is no surprise that He speaks reliable words. He promised to lead His followers into a fuller realization of the truth (John 16:12-14). This truth—found in its most clear expression in the biblical writings—provides both the pathway  to God  and a framework for    living under His rule (John 17:17).TRUTH IN LIFE  ,[object Object],http://www.angelfire.com/pa2/truthandthings/ NOTE then Romans 1:22:  “PROFESSING TO BE WISE.”   Now there are two points of view in this world in which we live in:  THE CHRISTIAN POINT OF VIEW OF THE WORLD AND THOSE WHO LIVE IN IT AND HOW WE SHOULD LIVE IT ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE, WE BELIEVE IS GOD’S WORD FOR US. AND WE SAY THAT IS THE TRUTH. THE WORLD’S POINT OF VIEW:  What we mean here is man’s point of view which has been determined by man themselves without the knowledge of God. Now,  we all like to believe we have the sense whereby we know the truth in matters of life and death, heaven and hell,  God and Satan. We all like to think we have the keys which unlock our minds to realize what is truth and what is not. We like to profess that we have a belief that we know is correct.  Often we delight in ourselves in believing we have the truth down rather well. We have concluded that after much research and thinking, we have come to know the truth.  And we have become rather wise in our own speculations and having looked at the revelation that God has presented in the Bible, we reject the words of God has having real signification in our daily thinking about life itself. We quite frankly assert and affirm to be wise and sensible and  intelligent in our way of thinking and in our particular belief. As a matter of fact we are so wise we state rather confidently without need for proof or regard for it. You know how much research goes into our knowing how to be wise in this life we are living? Our subject here is this matter of the rejecting to know God as God We are not saying that mankind is not smart and wise in matters that pertain to the physical world.  I am glad they have figured out how to have water in the house rather than in a spring running down the side of the yard.  I have glad we don’t have to go to the outhouse   Paul is not saying the ancient philosophy was totally wrong.  They might have had a lot of good things to say, but what they had to say did not prevent  most civilized nations, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans from being at the same time the most idolatrous of ancient times. We are speaking of man denying that they need a Savior.  We are speaking of man saying we reject what God has revealed about Himself, be it in Creation or the Bible.  We reject both Creation is of God, and that the Bible is not necessary to know what we should know. Man can choose if they are going to listen to man’s point of view about life or we can choose to believe what Christianity, the Bible has to say about life and death, heaven and hell, what is sin and what is right and wrong, what is spiritual and what is spirituality.   Man has conveyed they idea with an air of certainty, and stating with some high degree of confidence that what God has revealed and said is not correct or is it the truth. Man has so rationalize his behavior  so as to devise and believe his own philosophies about God, the universe and himself. Today man call evil good, and good evil.  Malachi 2:17 and 3:15.  They have substitute bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter.  Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes, and clever in their own sight. Judges 21:25 is correct.  We do wrong all the time, and because of the deception thought it was right.  Proverbs 17:15 warns against such thinking. SO HERE IS WHAT HAPPEN.  When people, or mankind, rejected the truth revealed by God, in creation, in their heart, in the Bible  they became under the wrath of God.  When they refused to see God as God, and they refused to glorify Him as God, they became vain laboring of the mind., and finally, complete separation from truth, and entered into a state of folly, they became fools,. (From God’s point of view). You know many do not see their behavior as SIN in their own eyes.  Isaiah 47:10.  They felt secure in their wickedness and said, “No one sees me.” Why?  Their own wisdom and knowledge have misled them. And they say, “I am and there is no one besides me. THEY BECAME FOOLS:   Here is what they did:  they rejected the light of God’s knowledge in their consciences, and they now claim themselves as having wisdom.   ,[object Object],Thus as a result of such belief they become fools.  Psalms 14:1 tells us. LISTEN, WIL YOU TODAY All of creation shout out loud in glorious harmony the resounding chorus….. ,[object Object],Despite overwhelming evidence, men have made a choice of their will to deny the irrefutable, unutterably, glorious truth of natural revelation, and not to mention the special revelation found in God’s Holy Word the Bible.  ,[object Object],FOOLS:   ,[object Object]
In other words, the term refers to the physical dullness.
One becomes in their intellectual life, devoid of meaning. We might say of a person. “What they are saying just don’t make any sense.”  “It’s just nonsense.”In scripture there are four words used for this term. ,[object Object]
Jeremiah 10:14….. “Every man is stupid, devoid of knowledge.
Matthew 5:13…….”You are the salt of the earth; but have become tasteless.
Rm 1:22………..”Professing to be wise, they became wise.”May I say this:  THE GREATEST FOOL IN ALL THE WORLD, AND IN THIS TOWN, IS THE PERSON WHO EXCHANGES GOD’S WISDOM OF TRUTH AND LIGHT FOR MAN’S WISDOM OF DECIT AND DARKNESS. ILLUSTRATION: ,[object Object]
On page 358 the authors describe the utter complexity of the cell. There is no such thing as a "simple one-celled organism"! Even the simplest cell has turned out to be "a micro-universe" (p.358).
Then on p.388 we read, "...this really is the major problem of biology. How did this complexity arise?...biologists still confront the deep, basic mystery of science:
How did it all begin?"
Then on page 390 the "experts" answer this by crediting it all to CHANCE and saying that given enough time even the IMPOSSIBLE can happen!
With time, chance and evolution all things are possible! "They have become fools" -- Romans 1:21, 22.While we would say these men of science and philosophy are brilliant men, they have a spiritual hallucination. God would say they have this mental disorder.  The very people in Paul’s day  rose to a kind of perfection among the people , and claimed to have wisdom. Those in the ancient world philosophers  ,[object Object]

More Related Content

What's hot

17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God?
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God?17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God?
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God?
William Anderson
 
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God? Notes (Letter Sized)
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God? Notes (Letter Sized)17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God? Notes (Letter Sized)
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God? Notes (Letter Sized)
William Anderson
 
03. What isnt the Gospel Notes
03. What isnt the Gospel Notes03. What isnt the Gospel Notes
03. What isnt the Gospel Notes
William Anderson
 
Conversational Apologetics: Power Point and Notes
Conversational Apologetics: Power Point and NotesConversational Apologetics: Power Point and Notes
Conversational Apologetics: Power Point and Notes
evidenceforchristianity
 
The helmet of salvation only
The helmet of salvation   onlyThe helmet of salvation   only
The helmet of salvation only
Ehab Roufail
 
The Pattern of All False Religions
The Pattern of All False ReligionsThe Pattern of All False Religions
The Pattern of All False Religions
Robin Schumacher
 
Hebrew mindset
Hebrew mindsetHebrew mindset
Hebrew mindset
Butch Yulo
 
Teen Seeking God And Finding Him
Teen Seeking God And Finding HimTeen Seeking God And Finding Him
Teen Seeking God And Finding Him
Brian Smeltzer
 
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
Robin Schumacher
 
Can We Know God?
Can We Know God?Can We Know God?
Can We Know God?
Robin Schumacher
 
Jesus was the greatest liberator
Jesus was the greatest liberatorJesus was the greatest liberator
Jesus was the greatest liberator
GLENN PEASE
 
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 1
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 1The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 1
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 1
Robin Schumacher
 
Got Ethics - The best argument against christianity
Got Ethics - The best argument against christianityGot Ethics - The best argument against christianity
Got Ethics - The best argument against christianity
Robin Schumacher
 
Free Sermon Outline - Hebrews 11:1-6 - A Matter of Faith
Free Sermon Outline - Hebrews 11:1-6 - A Matter of FaithFree Sermon Outline - Hebrews 11:1-6 - A Matter of Faith
Free Sermon Outline - Hebrews 11:1-6 - A Matter of Faith
SermonOutlines
 
Jesus was rejected in his sound instruction
Jesus was rejected in his sound instructionJesus was rejected in his sound instruction
Jesus was rejected in his sound instruction
GLENN PEASE
 
Reflections on the Emerging Church - Part 2
Reflections on the Emerging Church - Part 2Reflections on the Emerging Church - Part 2
Reflections on the Emerging Church - Part 2
Robin Schumacher
 
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Christianity (Part 1)?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Christianity (Part 1)?The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Christianity (Part 1)?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Christianity (Part 1)?
Robin Schumacher
 
Prophetic imagination
Prophetic imaginationProphetic imagination
Prophetic imagination
Butch Yulo
 
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 2
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 2Being Sure About Salvation - Part 2
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 2
Robin Schumacher
 
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 3
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 3Being Sure About Salvation - Part 3
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 3
Robin Schumacher
 

What's hot (20)

17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God?
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God?17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God?
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God?
 
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God? Notes (Letter Sized)
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God? Notes (Letter Sized)17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God? Notes (Letter Sized)
17. Why Do People Refuse to Believe in God? Notes (Letter Sized)
 
03. What isnt the Gospel Notes
03. What isnt the Gospel Notes03. What isnt the Gospel Notes
03. What isnt the Gospel Notes
 
Conversational Apologetics: Power Point and Notes
Conversational Apologetics: Power Point and NotesConversational Apologetics: Power Point and Notes
Conversational Apologetics: Power Point and Notes
 
The helmet of salvation only
The helmet of salvation   onlyThe helmet of salvation   only
The helmet of salvation only
 
The Pattern of All False Religions
The Pattern of All False ReligionsThe Pattern of All False Religions
The Pattern of All False Religions
 
Hebrew mindset
Hebrew mindsetHebrew mindset
Hebrew mindset
 
Teen Seeking God And Finding Him
Teen Seeking God And Finding HimTeen Seeking God And Finding Him
Teen Seeking God And Finding Him
 
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
 
Can We Know God?
Can We Know God?Can We Know God?
Can We Know God?
 
Jesus was the greatest liberator
Jesus was the greatest liberatorJesus was the greatest liberator
Jesus was the greatest liberator
 
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 1
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 1The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 1
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 1
 
Got Ethics - The best argument against christianity
Got Ethics - The best argument against christianityGot Ethics - The best argument against christianity
Got Ethics - The best argument against christianity
 
Free Sermon Outline - Hebrews 11:1-6 - A Matter of Faith
Free Sermon Outline - Hebrews 11:1-6 - A Matter of FaithFree Sermon Outline - Hebrews 11:1-6 - A Matter of Faith
Free Sermon Outline - Hebrews 11:1-6 - A Matter of Faith
 
Jesus was rejected in his sound instruction
Jesus was rejected in his sound instructionJesus was rejected in his sound instruction
Jesus was rejected in his sound instruction
 
Reflections on the Emerging Church - Part 2
Reflections on the Emerging Church - Part 2Reflections on the Emerging Church - Part 2
Reflections on the Emerging Church - Part 2
 
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Christianity (Part 1)?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Christianity (Part 1)?The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Christianity (Part 1)?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Christianity (Part 1)?
 
Prophetic imagination
Prophetic imaginationProphetic imagination
Prophetic imagination
 
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 2
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 2Being Sure About Salvation - Part 2
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 2
 
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 3
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 3Being Sure About Salvation - Part 3
Being Sure About Salvation - Part 3
 

Viewers also liked

Romans 09 13
Romans 09 13Romans 09 13
Creation Oultine 11 18 09 Serpent
Creation Oultine 11 18 09 SerpentCreation Oultine 11 18 09 Serpent
Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006
Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006
Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006
Rivers of Joy Baptist Church, Pastor/Teacher Charles e Whisnant
 
Rivers Of Joy MyChurch material
Rivers Of Joy MyChurch materialRivers Of Joy MyChurch material
Table Of Content For Bloggers Posts In 2007
Table Of Content For Bloggers Posts In 2007Table Of Content For Bloggers Posts In 2007
Table Of Content For Bloggers Posts In 2007
Rivers of Joy Baptist Church, Pastor/Teacher Charles e Whisnant
 
Creation Outline 12 30 09 Women
Creation Outline 12 30 09  WomenCreation Outline 12 30 09  Women
Grow By Learning[2] September December 2008
Grow By Learning[2] September   December 2008Grow By Learning[2] September   December 2008
Grow By Learning[2] September December 2008
Rivers of Joy Baptist Church, Pastor/Teacher Charles e Whisnant
 
Grow By Learning[4] 2009 May Aug
Grow By Learning[4] 2009 May AugGrow By Learning[4] 2009 May Aug
Philippians 2 15 16 outline why should we quit complaining 3
Philippians 2 15 16 outline  why should we quit complaining 3Philippians 2 15 16 outline  why should we quit complaining 3
Philippians 2 15 16 outline why should we quit complaining 3
Rivers of Joy Baptist Church, Pastor/Teacher Charles e Whisnant
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Creation The Promise Of Redemption Part 2
Creation The Promise Of Redemption Part 2Creation The Promise Of Redemption Part 2
Creation The Promise Of Redemption Part 2
 
Creation Day Six Outine
Creation Day Six OutineCreation Day Six Outine
Creation Day Six Outine
 
Creation outline 03 10 10 atonment
Creation outline 03 10 10 atonmentCreation outline 03 10 10 atonment
Creation outline 03 10 10 atonment
 
Romans 09 13
Romans 09 13Romans 09 13
Romans 09 13
 
Creation Oultine 11 18 09 Serpent
Creation Oultine 11 18 09 SerpentCreation Oultine 11 18 09 Serpent
Creation Oultine 11 18 09 Serpent
 
Charles Whisnant, and speakers in March 2010
Charles Whisnant, and speakers in  March 2010Charles Whisnant, and speakers in  March 2010
Charles Whisnant, and speakers in March 2010
 
The Curse Of Man Introduction Outline
The Curse Of Man Introduction OutlineThe Curse Of Man Introduction Outline
The Curse Of Man Introduction Outline
 
Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006
Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006
Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006
 
Rivers Of Joy MyChurch material
Rivers Of Joy MyChurch materialRivers Of Joy MyChurch material
Rivers Of Joy MyChurch material
 
Table Of Content For Bloggers Posts In 2007
Table Of Content For Bloggers Posts In 2007Table Of Content For Bloggers Posts In 2007
Table Of Content For Bloggers Posts In 2007
 
Creation Outline 12 30 09 Women
Creation Outline 12 30 09  WomenCreation Outline 12 30 09  Women
Creation Outline 12 30 09 Women
 
Grow By Learning[2] September December 2008
Grow By Learning[2] September   December 2008Grow By Learning[2] September   December 2008
Grow By Learning[2] September December 2008
 
Grow By Learning[4] 2009 May Aug
Grow By Learning[4] 2009 May AugGrow By Learning[4] 2009 May Aug
Grow By Learning[4] 2009 May Aug
 
Philippians 2 15 16 outline why should we quit complaining 3
Philippians 2 15 16 outline  why should we quit complaining 3Philippians 2 15 16 outline  why should we quit complaining 3
Philippians 2 15 16 outline why should we quit complaining 3
 

Similar to Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006

Romans 2 outline 6 13 and 20
Romans 2 outline 6 13 and 20Romans 2 outline 6 13 and 20
The holy spirit sanctifying work
The holy spirit sanctifying workThe holy spirit sanctifying work
The holy spirit sanctifying work
GLENN PEASE
 
Biblical Theology of Revelation
Biblical Theology of RevelationBiblical Theology of Revelation
Biblical Theology of RevelationDomenic Marbaniang
 
Jesus was to sprinkle us with his blood
Jesus was to sprinkle us with his bloodJesus was to sprinkle us with his blood
Jesus was to sprinkle us with his blood
GLENN PEASE
 
Freedom To Love 2008 11 08
Freedom To Love 2008 11 08Freedom To Love 2008 11 08
Freedom To Love 2008 11 08olopya
 
Romans 1 Outline 02 10 10
Romans 1 Outline 02 10 10Romans 1 Outline 02 10 10
Answering the Hard Questions: A Power Point
Answering the Hard Questions: A Power PointAnswering the Hard Questions: A Power Point
Answering the Hard Questions: A Power Point
evidenceforchristianity
 
Jesus was the firstborn among many brothers and sisters
Jesus was the firstborn among many brothers and sistersJesus was the firstborn among many brothers and sisters
Jesus was the firstborn among many brothers and sisters
GLENN PEASE
 
Jesus was the image god wants for us all
Jesus was the image god wants for us allJesus was the image god wants for us all
Jesus was the image god wants for us all
GLENN PEASE
 
Acts 1 evangelism
Acts 1 evangelismActs 1 evangelism
Acts 1 evangelism
SeanSpelgatti
 
Part 66 Humanism As Opposed To Godliness!
Part 66  Humanism As Opposed To Godliness!  Part 66  Humanism As Opposed To Godliness!
Part 66 Humanism As Opposed To Godliness!
Ralph W Knowles
 
Religion Answers To Life Questions 282
Religion  Answers To  Life  Questions 282Religion  Answers To  Life  Questions 282
Religion Answers To Life Questions 282Santosh Mote
 
The Gift - A New Life for You
The Gift - A New Life for YouThe Gift - A New Life for You
The Gift - A New Life for You
Mark Lambert
 
18. Why Believe in God Notes (Letter sized)
18. Why Believe in God Notes (Letter sized)18. Why Believe in God Notes (Letter sized)
18. Why Believe in God Notes (Letter sized)
William Anderson
 
How Can a Loving God Condemn Anyone to Hell?
How Can a Loving God Condemn Anyone to Hell?How Can a Loving God Condemn Anyone to Hell?
How Can a Loving God Condemn Anyone to Hell?
Peter Hammond
 
Jesus was the true god
Jesus was the true godJesus was the true god
Jesus was the true god
GLENN PEASE
 

Similar to Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006 (20)

One God Presentation
One God PresentationOne God Presentation
One God Presentation
 
Romans 3 vs 9 outline 07 11 10 the condition that mankind is in today
Romans 3 vs 9 outline 07 11 10 the condition that mankind is in todayRomans 3 vs 9 outline 07 11 10 the condition that mankind is in today
Romans 3 vs 9 outline 07 11 10 the condition that mankind is in today
 
Romans 2 outline 6 13 and 20
Romans 2 outline 6 13 and 20Romans 2 outline 6 13 and 20
Romans 2 outline 6 13 and 20
 
The holy spirit sanctifying work
The holy spirit sanctifying workThe holy spirit sanctifying work
The holy spirit sanctifying work
 
Biblical Theology of Revelation
Biblical Theology of RevelationBiblical Theology of Revelation
Biblical Theology of Revelation
 
Jesus was to sprinkle us with his blood
Jesus was to sprinkle us with his bloodJesus was to sprinkle us with his blood
Jesus was to sprinkle us with his blood
 
Freedom To Love 2008 11 08
Freedom To Love 2008 11 08Freedom To Love 2008 11 08
Freedom To Love 2008 11 08
 
Romans 1 Outline 02 10 10
Romans 1 Outline 02 10 10Romans 1 Outline 02 10 10
Romans 1 Outline 02 10 10
 
Part 21 the man of sin.
Part 21 the man of sin.Part 21 the man of sin.
Part 21 the man of sin.
 
No.218 english
No.218 englishNo.218 english
No.218 english
 
Answering the Hard Questions: A Power Point
Answering the Hard Questions: A Power PointAnswering the Hard Questions: A Power Point
Answering the Hard Questions: A Power Point
 
Jesus was the firstborn among many brothers and sisters
Jesus was the firstborn among many brothers and sistersJesus was the firstborn among many brothers and sisters
Jesus was the firstborn among many brothers and sisters
 
Jesus was the image god wants for us all
Jesus was the image god wants for us allJesus was the image god wants for us all
Jesus was the image god wants for us all
 
Acts 1 evangelism
Acts 1 evangelismActs 1 evangelism
Acts 1 evangelism
 
Part 66 Humanism As Opposed To Godliness!
Part 66  Humanism As Opposed To Godliness!  Part 66  Humanism As Opposed To Godliness!
Part 66 Humanism As Opposed To Godliness!
 
Religion Answers To Life Questions 282
Religion  Answers To  Life  Questions 282Religion  Answers To  Life  Questions 282
Religion Answers To Life Questions 282
 
The Gift - A New Life for You
The Gift - A New Life for YouThe Gift - A New Life for You
The Gift - A New Life for You
 
18. Why Believe in God Notes (Letter sized)
18. Why Believe in God Notes (Letter sized)18. Why Believe in God Notes (Letter sized)
18. Why Believe in God Notes (Letter sized)
 
How Can a Loving God Condemn Anyone to Hell?
How Can a Loving God Condemn Anyone to Hell?How Can a Loving God Condemn Anyone to Hell?
How Can a Loving God Condemn Anyone to Hell?
 
Jesus was the true god
Jesus was the true godJesus was the true god
Jesus was the true god
 

More from Rivers of Joy Baptist Church, Pastor/Teacher Charles e Whisnant

Cross reference
Cross referenceCross reference
Luke 4 14 31 cew manuscript 03 01 14
Luke 4 14 31 cew manuscript 03 01 14Luke 4 14 31 cew manuscript 03 01 14
Luke 4 1 to 14 outline notes 03 01
Luke 4 1 to 14  outline notes 03 01Luke 4 1 to 14  outline notes 03 01
First peter 2 12 Diagram by cew
First peter 2  12 Diagram by cewFirst peter 2  12 Diagram by cew
Evangelism salvation correctly done
Evangelism salvation correctly doneEvangelism salvation correctly done
Bible how to use it great scritpure
Bible how to use it great scritpureBible how to use it great scritpure
Bible how to understand the bible
Bible how to understand the bibleBible how to understand the bible
Exegesis and exposition textbook
Exegesis and exposition textbookExegesis and exposition textbook
Alar calls verses personal evangelsim
Alar calls verses personal evangelsimAlar calls verses personal evangelsim
Doctrinal study of impassivity of god
Doctrinal study of impassivity of godDoctrinal study of impassivity of god
Calvin on christology study icon
Calvin on christology study iconCalvin on christology study icon
First peter 1 14 18 outline
First peter 1 14 18 outlineFirst peter 1 14 18 outline
Expositional p reaching 19
Expositional p reaching 19Expositional p reaching 19
Descriptive and prescriptivism linguistics
Descriptive and prescriptivism   linguisticsDescriptive and prescriptivism   linguistics
Descriptive and prescriptivism linguistics
Rivers of Joy Baptist Church, Pastor/Teacher Charles e Whisnant
 

More from Rivers of Joy Baptist Church, Pastor/Teacher Charles e Whisnant (20)

Cross reference
Cross referenceCross reference
Cross reference
 
Luke 4 14 31 cew manuscript 03 01 14
Luke 4 14 31 cew manuscript 03 01 14Luke 4 14 31 cew manuscript 03 01 14
Luke 4 14 31 cew manuscript 03 01 14
 
Luke 4 14 31 sermons
Luke 4 14 31  sermonsLuke 4 14 31  sermons
Luke 4 14 31 sermons
 
Luke 4 14 30 study of the teaching of jesus 03 01
Luke 4 14 30 study of the teaching of jesus  03 01Luke 4 14 30 study of the teaching of jesus  03 01
Luke 4 14 30 study of the teaching of jesus 03 01
 
Luke 4 1 to 14 outline notes 03 01
Luke 4 1 to 14  outline notes 03 01Luke 4 1 to 14  outline notes 03 01
Luke 4 1 to 14 outline notes 03 01
 
Luke 1 18 91 mauscript 03 05 2014 ce3w
Luke 1 18 91 mauscript 03 05 2014 ce3wLuke 1 18 91 mauscript 03 05 2014 ce3w
Luke 1 18 91 mauscript 03 05 2014 ce3w
 
First Peter 2 1 to 3 outline
First  Peter 2  1 to 3 outlineFirst  Peter 2  1 to 3 outline
First Peter 2 1 to 3 outline
 
First peter 2 12 Diagram by cew
First peter 2  12 Diagram by cewFirst peter 2  12 Diagram by cew
First peter 2 12 Diagram by cew
 
Evangelism salvation correctly done
Evangelism salvation correctly doneEvangelism salvation correctly done
Evangelism salvation correctly done
 
Bible how to use it great scritpure
Bible how to use it great scritpureBible how to use it great scritpure
Bible how to use it great scritpure
 
Bible how to understand the bible
Bible how to understand the bibleBible how to understand the bible
Bible how to understand the bible
 
Exegesis and exposition textbook
Exegesis and exposition textbookExegesis and exposition textbook
Exegesis and exposition textbook
 
Alar calls verses personal evangelsim
Alar calls verses personal evangelsimAlar calls verses personal evangelsim
Alar calls verses personal evangelsim
 
Doctrinal study of impassivity of god
Doctrinal study of impassivity of godDoctrinal study of impassivity of god
Doctrinal study of impassivity of god
 
Calvin on christology study icon
Calvin on christology study iconCalvin on christology study icon
Calvin on christology study icon
 
First peter 1 14 18 outline
First peter 1 14 18 outlineFirst peter 1 14 18 outline
First peter 1 14 18 outline
 
Expositional p reaching 19
Expositional p reaching 19Expositional p reaching 19
Expositional p reaching 19
 
Doctrine: My Positon on Doctrine
Doctrine: My Positon on DoctrineDoctrine: My Positon on Doctrine
Doctrine: My Positon on Doctrine
 
Descriptive and prescriptivism linguistics
Descriptive and prescriptivism   linguisticsDescriptive and prescriptivism   linguistics
Descriptive and prescriptivism linguistics
 
Romans 12 3 to 5 exposition spiritual gifts 07 04 14
Romans 12 3 to 5 exposition  spiritual gifts 07 04 14Romans 12 3 to 5 exposition  spiritual gifts 07 04 14
Romans 12 3 to 5 exposition spiritual gifts 07 04 14
 

Grow By Learning[1] August 2006 Thru November 2006

  • 1.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7. In other words, the term refers to the physical dullness.
  • 8.
  • 9. Jeremiah 10:14….. “Every man is stupid, devoid of knowledge.
  • 10. Matthew 5:13…….”You are the salt of the earth; but have become tasteless.
  • 11.
  • 12. On page 358 the authors describe the utter complexity of the cell. There is no such thing as a "simple one-celled organism"! Even the simplest cell has turned out to be "a micro-universe" (p.358).
  • 13. Then on p.388 we read, "...this really is the major problem of biology. How did this complexity arise?...biologists still confront the deep, basic mystery of science:
  • 14. How did it all begin?"
  • 15. Then on page 390 the "experts" answer this by crediting it all to CHANCE and saying that given enough time even the IMPOSSIBLE can happen!
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18. Again, the Greeks outlined two opposing approaches to the problem of knowledge.  One is called empiricism, which says that all knowledge comes through the senses.  The other is called rationalism, which says that knowledge is a matter of reason, thought.  There are other answers in epistemology as well.  In fact, empiricism and rationalism have never been entirely exclusive.
  • 19. The third aspect of philosophy that we will be concerned with is ethics.  Ethics is the philosophical understanding of good and bad, right and wrong.  It is often called morality, and most consider the two words synonymous. After all, ethics comes from ethos, which is Greek for customs, and morality comes from mores, which is Latin for customs!Voltaire (1694 - 1778): If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent Him. Sad to say, but once a man, woman, rejects the truth of God in Christ, he or she will fall for anything foolish, and trust far more questionable and unbelievable systems that what he has rejected from God. This senselessness, futility of thinking, darkening of the heart, and folly must be seen as one manifestation of God’s righteous wrath against those who have rejected His revelation. SDFFF You know, when we see the conditions of society outside Christ, we are dismayed, and amazed that He would design to save sinners, rejecters like us. Romans 7:23-25 The fact is, the real truth is, if we were left to ourselves, we are utter fools. We really have no wisdom whatever to direct our steps in this life. We really are blind, ignorant, weak, helpless, and truly unable to find our way to God. James 3:13-18 says it correctly: From God’s point of view, God theology not man’s philosophy All wisdom which does not come from the Lord Jesus Christ is foolishness. All strength not divinely shaped in the soul is weakness. All knowledge that does not arrive from the Lord’s own teaching in the conscience is the depth of ignorance. THE DIAMONDSAPPRAISER FOOTNOTE: Major World Philosophers General Information Abelard, Peter (1079 - 1142). French philosopher. One of the most influential medieval logicians and theologians. Around 1113, while teaching theology in Paris, Abelard fell in love with his student Heloise, whom he secretly married; he was condemned for heresy a few years later because of his nominalist views about universals. Anaxagoras (c. 500 - 428 B.C.). Greek Presocratic philosopher who is said to have made Athens the center of philosophy and to have been Socrates' teacher; he rejected the four elements theory of Empedocles and posited instead an infinite number of unique particles of which all objects are composed. Anselm, St. (1033 - 1109). Italian monk and Scholastic theologian who became archbishop of Canterbury. St. Anselm founded Scholasticism, integrated Aristotelian logic into theology, and believed that reason and revelation are compatible. He is most famous for his influential ontological argument for God's existence. Aquinas, St. Thomas (1225 - 74). The greatest thinker of the Scholastic School. His ideas were, in 1879, made the official Catholic philosophy. He incorporated Greek ideas into Christianity by showing Aristotle's thought to be compatible with church doctrine. In his system, reason and faith (revelation) form two separate but harmonious realms whose truths complement rather than oppose one another. He presented influential philosophical proofs for the existence of God. Aristotle (384 - 322 B.C.). Greek philosopher, scientist, logician, and student of many disciplines. Aristotle studied under Plato and became the tutor of Alexander the Great. In 335 he opened the Lyceum, a major philosophical and scientific school in Athens. Aristotle emphasized the observation of nature and analyzed all things in terms of the four causes. In ethics, he stressed that virtue is a mean between extremes and that man's highest goal should be the use of his intellect. Most of Aristotle's works were lost to Christian civilization from the fifth through the twelfth centuries. Augustine of Hippo, St. (354 - 430). The greatest of the Latin church fathers and possibly the most influential Christian thinker after St. Paul. St. Augustine emphasized man's need for grace. His Confessions and The City of God were highly influential. Averroes (1126 - 98). Spanish-born Arabian philosopher, lawyer, and physician whose detailed commentaries on Aristotle were influential for over 300 years. He emphasized the compatibility of faith and reason but believed philosophical knowledge to be derived from reason. The Church condemned his views. Avicenna (980 - 1037). Islamic medieval philosopher born in Persia. His Neoplatonist interpretation of Aristotle greatly influenced medieval philosophers, including St. Thomas Aquinas. Avicenna was also a physician; his writings on medicine were important for nearly 500 years. Bacon, Sir Francis (1561 - 1626). English statesman, essayist, and philosopher, one of the great precursors of the tradition of British empiricism and of belief in the importance of scientific method. He emphasized the use of inductive reasoning in the pursuit of knowledge. Boethius (c. 475 - 535). Roman statesman, philosopher, and translator of Aristotle, whose Consolation of Philosophy (written in prison) was widely read throughout the Middle Ages; it showed reason's role in the face of misfortune and was the link between the ancient philosophers and the Scholastics. Descartes, Rene (1596 - 1650). French philosopher and scientist, considered the father of modern philosophical inquiry. Descartes tried to extend mathematical method to all knowledge in his search for certainty. Discarding the medieval appeal to authority, he began with universal doubt, finding that the only thing that could not be doubted was his own thinking. The result was his famous Cogito, ergo sum, or I think, therefore I am. Dewey, John (1859 - 1952). Leading American philosopher, psychologist, and educational theorist. Dewey developed the views of Charles S. Peirce (1839 - 1914) and William James into his own version of pragmatism. He emphasized the importance of inquiry in gaining knowledge and attacked the view that knowledge is passive. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1770 - 1831). German philosopher whose idealistic system of metaphysics was highly influential; it was based on a concept of the world as a single organism developing by its own inner logic through trios of stages called thesis, antithesis, and synthesis and gradually coming to embody reason. Hegel held the monarchy to be the highest development of the state. Heidegger, Martin (1889 - 1976). German philosopher who studied with Husserl. Heidegger's own philosophy, which was influenced by Kierkegaard, emphasized the need to understand being, especially the unique ways that humans act in and relate to the world. Hobbes, Thomas (1588 - 1679). English materialist and empiricist, one of the founders of modern political philosophy. In the Leviathan, Hobbes argued that because men are selfish by nature, a powerful absolute ruler is necessary. In a social contract, men agree to give up many personal liberties and accept such rule. Hume, David (1711 - 76). British empiricist whose arguments against the proofs for God's existence are still influential. Hume held that moral beliefs have no basis in reason, but are based solely on custom. James, William (1842 - 1910). American philosopher and psychologist, one of the founders of Pragmatism, and one of the most influential thinkers of his era. James viewed consciousness as actively shaping reality, defined truth as the expedient way of thinking, and held that ideas are tools for guiding our future actions rather than reproductions of our past experiences. Kant, Immanuel (1724 - 1804). German philosopher, possibly the most influential of modern times. He synthesized Leibniz's rationalism and Hume's skepticism into his critical philosophy : that ideas do not conform to the external world, but rather the world can be known only insofar as it conforms to the mind's own structure. Kant claimed that morality requires a belief in God, freedom, and immortality, although these can be proved neither scientifically nor by metaphysics. Kierkegaard, Soren (1813 - 55). Danish philosopher, religious thinker, and extraordinarily influential founder of existentialism. Kierkegaard held that truth is subjectivity, that religion is an individual matter, and that man's relationship to God requires suffering. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1646 - 1716). German philosopher, diplomat, and mathematician, one of the great minds of all time. Leibniz was an inventor (with Sir Isaac Newton) of the calculus and a forefather of modern mathematical logic. He held that the entire universe is one large system expressing God's plan. Locke, John (1632 - 1704). Highly influential founder of British empiricism. Locke believed that all ideas come to mind from experience and that none are innate. He also held that authority derives solely from the consent of the governed, a view that deeply influenced the American Revolution and the writing of the U.S. Constitution. Machiavelli, Niccolo (1469 - 1527). Italian Renaissance statesman and political writer. In The Prince, one of the most influential political books of modern times, Machiavelli argues that any act of a ruler designed to gain and hold power is permissible. The term Machiavellian is used to refer to any political tactics that are cunning and power-oriented. Maimonides (1135 - 1204). Spanish-born medieval Jewish philosopher and thinker. Maimonides tried to synthesize Aristotelian and Judaic thought. His works had enormous influence on Jewish and Christian thought. Marx, Karl (1818 - 83). German revolutionary thinker, social philosopher, and economist. His ideas, formulated with Engels, laid the foundation for nineteenth-century socialism and twentieth-century communism. Although Marx was initially influenced by Hegel, he soon rejected Hegel's idealism in favor of materialism. His Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital are among the most important writings of the last 200 years. Mill, John Stuart (1806 - 73). English empiricist philosopher, logician, economist, and social reformer. His System of Logic described the basic rules for all scientific reasoning. As a student of Jeremy Bentham, he elaborated on utilitarian ethics; in On Liberty, he presented a plea for the sanctity of individual rights against the power of any government. Moore, G. E. (George Edward) (1873 - 1958). British philosopher who emphasized the common sense view of the reality of material objects. In ethics, Moore held that goodness is a quality known directly by moral intuition and that it is a fallacy to try to define it in terms of anything else. More, Sir Thomas (1478 - 1535). A leading Renaissance humanist and statesman, Lord Chancellor of England. More was beheaded for refusing to accept the king as head of the Church. Influenced by Greek thinking, he believed in social reform and drew a picture of an ideal peaceful state in his Utopia. Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm (1844 - 1900). German philosopher, philologist, and poet. As a moralist, he rejected Christian values and championed a Superman who would create a new, life-affirming, heroic ethic by his will to power. Pascal, Blaise (1623 - 62). French philosopher, mathematician, scientist, and theologian. His posthumous Pensees ( Thoughts ) argues that reason is by itself inadequate for man's spiritual needs and cannot bring man to God, who can be known only through mystic understanding. Plato (c. 428 - c. 348 B.C.). Athenian father of Western philosophy and student of Socrates, after whose death he traveled widely. On returning to Athens, he founded an Academy, where he taught until he died. His writings are in the form of dialogues between Socrates and other Athenians. Many of Plato's views are set forth in The Republic, where an ideal state postulates philosopher kings, specially trained at the highest levels of moral and mathematical knowledge. Plato's other works analyzed moral virtues, the nature of knowledge, and the immortality of the soul. His views on cosmology strongly influenced the next two thousand years of scientific thinking. Plotinus (205 - 270). Egyptian-born founder of Neoplatonism, who synthesized the ideas of Plato and other Greek philosophers. Plotinus believed all reality is caused by a series of outpourings (called emanations) from the divine source. Although not himself a Christian, he was a major influence on Christianity. Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1712 - 78). Swiss-French thinker, born in Geneva. Rousseau has been enormously influential in political philosophy, educational theory, and the Romantic movement. In The Social Contract (1762), he viewed governments as being expressions of the people's general will, or rational men's choice for the common good. Rousseau emphasized man's natural goodness. Russell, Bertrand (1872 - 1970). English philosopher and logician influential as an agnostic and a pacifist. Early work with Alfred North Whitehead gave birth to modern logic. Russell changed his views numerous times but always sought to establish philosophy, especially epistemology, as a science. Santayana, George (1863 - 1952). Spanish-born American philosopher and poet; a student of William James. Santayana attempted to reconcile Platonism and materialism, studied how reason works, and found animal faith, or impulse, to be the basis of reason and belief. Sartre, Jean-Paul (1905 - 80). French philosopher, novelist, and dramatist; one of the founders of existentialism. Sartre was a Marxist through much of his life. He held that man is condemned to be free and to bear the responsibility of making free choices. Schopenhauer, Arthur (1788 - 1860). German post-Kantian philosopher who held that although irrational will is the driving force in human affairs, it is doomed not to be satisfied. He believed that only art and contemplation could offer escape from determinism and pessimism. Schopenhauer strongly influenced Nietzsche, Freud, Tolstoy, Proust, and Thomas Mann. Scotus, John Duns (c. 1266 - 1308). Scottish-born Scholastic philosopher who tried to integrate Aristotelian ideas into Christian theology. Scotus emphasized that all things depend not just on God's intellect but on divine will as well. Smith, Adam (1723 - 1790). Scottish philosopher and economist. He believed that if government left the marketplace to its own devices, an invisible hand would guarantee that the results would benefit the populace. Smith has had enormous influence on economists into the present day. Socrates (464 - 399 B.C.). Athenian philosopher who allegedly wrote down none of his views, supposedly from his belief that writing distorts ideas. His chief student, Plato, is the major source of knowledge of what is known of his life. Socrates questioned Athenians about their moral, political, and religious beliefs, as depicted in Plato's dialogues; his questioning technique, called dialectic, has greatly influenced western philosophy. Socrates is alleged to have said that the unexamined life is not worth living. In 399 B.C., he was brought to trial on charges of corrupting the youth and religious heresy. Sentenced to die, he drank poison. Spinoza, Benedict (Baruch) (1623 - 77). Dutch-born philosopher expelled from the Amsterdam Jewish community for heresy in 1656; he was attacked by Christian theologians 14 years later. In Ethics, Spinoza presents his views in a mathematical system of deductive reasoning. A proponent of monism, he held-in contrast to Descartes-that mind and body are aspects of a single substance, which he called God or nature. Voltaire (Francois Marie Arouet) (1694 - 1778). French philosopher, essayist, and historian; one of the major thinkers of the Enlightenment. A Deist who was anti-Christian, Voltaire widely advocated tolerance of liberal ideas and called for positive social action. His novel Cyandide is a parody of the optimism of Leibniz. Whitehead, Alfred North (1861 - 1947). British philosopher and mathematician who worked with Bertrand Russell. Whitehead tried to integrate twentieth-century physics into a metaphysics of nature. William of Ockham (Occam) (c. 1285 - c. 1349). Franciscan monk and important English theologian and philosopher. In his nominalism, he opposed much of the thought of St. Thomas Aquinas and of medieval Aristotelianism; he also rejected the Pope's power in the secular realm. Famous Quotes Jeremy Bentham (1748 - 1832): The greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation. Confucius (551 - 479 B.C.): Hold faithfulness and sincerity as first principles. Rene Descartes (1596 - 1650): Cogito, ergo sum (Latin for I think, therefore I am ). Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679): The life of a man (in a state of nature) is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804): Happiness is not an ideal of reason but of imagination. John Locke (1632 - 1704): No man's knowledge here can go beyond his experience. Niccolo Machiavelli (1469 - 1527): God is not willing to do everything, and thus take away our free will and that share of glory which belongs to us. John Stuart Mill (1806 - 73): Liberty consists in doing what one desires. Plato (428 - 348 B.C.): The life which is unexamined is not worth living. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970): It is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true. Seneca (c. 4 B.C. - A.D. 65): Even while they teach, men learn. Socrates (c. 470 - 399 B.C.): There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance. Voltaire (1694 - 1778): If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent Him. How to Argue Logically We like to think that we speak logically all the time, but we are aware that we sometimes use illogical means to persuade others of our point of view. In the heat of an impassioned argument, or when we are afraid our disputant has a stronger case, or when we don't quite have all the facts we'd like to have, we are prone to engage in faulty processes of reasoning, using arguments we hope will appear sound. Such defective arguments are called fallacies by philosophers who, starting with Aristotle, have catalogued and classified these fallacious arguments. There are now over 125 separate fallacies, most with their own impressive-sounding names, many of them in Latin. Some arguments have easily recognizable defects. For instance, in the argument ad hominem, a person's views are criticized because of a logically irrelevant personal defect: You can't take Smith's advice on the stock market; he's a known philanderer. In the genetic fallacy, something is mistakenly reduced to its origins: We know that emotions are nothing more than physiology; after all, medical research has shown emotions involve the secretion of hormones. Another illogical argument is named for the erroneous thinking a wagering person may fall prey to, the gambler's fallacy (also called the Monte Carlo fallacy): I'm betting on heads; it's got to come up since we've just had nine straight tails. Some fallacies may not be recognized as erroneous reasoning because they are such commonly used forms of argument. For instance, if we say, I'm sure my cold is due to the weather; I started sneezing right after it went from 60 degrees to 31 degrees in three hours, we are committing the fallacy with the Latin name of post hoc ergo propter hoc ( after this, therefore because of this ). Many a political argument exemplifies the fallacy of arguing in a circle; for instance: Only wealthy men are capable of leading the country; after all, leadership can be learned only if you have had money to exercise power. Many prejudicial or stereotypical arguments commit the fallacy of division, or of applying to the part what may be true of the whole: North Dakota has wide-open spaces; since Jack's farm is there, it must be quite large. The converse of this is the fallacy of composition, where properties of the parts are erroneously attributed to the whole: Every apple on this tree is rotten; therefore, the tree itself is hopelessly diseased. It may be a surprise to realize that some widely accepted forms of argument are just as fallacious as the most logically defective reasoning. When we appeal to the beliefs or behavior of the majority to prove the truth of something, we are committing the fallacy of consensus gentium: Imbibing alcohol cannot be bad for people, since all cultures studied have used alcohol. Or consider the person who argues that Tragedy is the highest form of literature; after all, didn't Aristotle consider it such? This is a form of the fallacy of arguing from authority. There is also the fallacy of ignoratio elenchus, which has nothing to do with ignorance; its name means that the point made is irrelevant to the issue at hand, as in the untenable view of a lawyer who says, Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you cannot convict my client of manslaughter while driving under the influence; after all, advertisements for alcohol exist everywhere in our culture. Fallacy {fal'-uh-see} In logic, a fallacy is a form of reasoning that is illogical or that violates the rules of valid argumentation. A formal fallacy makes strict violations of the rules of logic. An informal fallacy does not violate the rules of logic, but it violates the rules of valid reasoning or arrives at unsound conclusions, because of unsound reasoning. A common formal fallacy involves affirming the consequent or denying the antecedent in hypothetical reasoning. That is, if A, then B, affirming B as the proof of A, or denying A as the basis for denying B. In either case, it does not follow that the affirmation or the denial proves what is claimed. Thus, if all Americans are bald (A), then all Americans require no hairdressers (B)--the affirmation of A, that is, saying it is true, does not prove B; neither does the denial of B prove the denial of A. Two other kinds of formal fallacies that are important are the argument from the undistributed middle and the conversion of a universal positive proposition. In the first, it is argued that all A is B and all C is B ; therefore, all A is C. If Americans is substituted for A , human beings for B , and Hungarians for C , it is easily seen that the argument is fallacious. In the other case, it is argued that if all A is B, then all B is A ; this is obviously fallacious if the same substitutions are made. Because informal fallacies occur much more frequently in ordinary discussions, in political speeches, and in advertising, they are, in some ways, more important. Some of these fallacies are a result of the ambiguity of the terms used; people often slip unconsciously from one meaning of a term to another. Other major informal fallacies are the ignoratio elenchi, that is, arguing for something different from the question asked; and the tu quoque argument, in which an unsound argument is justified by claiming the unsoundness of another. These soon degenerate into the argument ad hominem, in which the argument of an opponent is countered by pointing to his or her personal faults rather than by considering the substance of the argument; and the argument from authority, which appeals to famous or important people who agree with a particular point of view. Richard H Popkin BibliographyEngel, S. Morris, With Good Reason: An Introduction to Informal Fallacies, 3d ed. (1985); Fearnside, W. Ward, and Holther, William B., Fallacy: The Counterfeit of Argument (1959).