This document outlines the grant awarding process in COST from application to payment. It describes the key steps and roles involved, including:
1) The applicant creates and submits a grant application with required documents.
2) The Grant Awarding Coordinator reviews and approves or rejects the application on behalf of the Management Committee.
3) If approved, the Grant Holder Manager sends a grant letter to the applicant.
4) The applicant submits a report within 30 days of completion.
5) The Grant Awarding Coordinator reviews and approves or rejects the report.
6) If approved, the Grant Holder Manager records payment to complete the process.
Guidelines for organize workshop & conference & seminarNursing Path
The document provides guidelines for colleges in organizing conferences, workshops and seminars during India's 12th Five Year Plan (2012-2017). It outlines the objectives to promote knowledge sharing and research. Financial assistance is available for state, national and international level events with ceilings of Rs. 1 lakh, Rs. 1.5 lakh and Rs. 2 lakh respectively. Colleges must apply in the prescribed format to the appropriate UGC regional office for consideration and approval of their event.
This document provides information and instructions for applying for a Great Streets Small Business Capital Improvement Grant from the District of Columbia. Eligible applicants are small business owners or real estate developers located in targeted Great Streets corridors who will use the grant funds for capital improvements. Applicants must meet eligibility criteria and grants of up to $85,000 will be awarded based on an evaluation of the applicant's experience, financial viability, job creation plans, and commitment to using local businesses and contractors. The application process, reimbursement procedures, and insurance requirements are also outlined.
This document outlines procedures for administering loans from IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development). It discusses basic principles like eligible expenditures and disbursement conditions. It describes the letter sent to borrowers and the disbursement handbook, which provide guidelines for withdrawing loan funds. The main disbursement procedures covered are the special/designated account procedure, direct payment procedure, reimbursement procedure, and special commitment procedure. Key aspects like opening and replenishing the designated account, supporting documentation, and recovering the initial deposit are also summarized.
Guidelines for Modified Scheme for setting up of Compound Semiconductors and ...ssuser668a58
The document provides guidelines for the Modified scheme for setting up Compound Semiconductors / Silicon Photonics / Sensors Fab/ Discrete Semiconductors Fab and Semiconductor Assembly, Testing, Marking and Packaging (ATMP)/ Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test (OSAT) facilities in India. It outlines eligibility requirements including minimum capital expenditure thresholds, defines key terms, and describes the application process and parameters for fiscal support of 50% of eligible capital expenditures that will be provided on a pari-passu basis to approved projects.
This document provides information and instructions for applying for the H Street NE Small Business Capital Improvement Grants program. Eligible applicants are small business owners located on the H Street NE corridor who are seeking funds of up to $85,000 for capital improvement projects. The application deadline is February 17, 2014. Applications will be evaluated based on the applicant's experience, financial viability, jobs created for DC residents, and use of local contractors. Applicants must meet eligibility criteria and submit documentation of expenditures and insurance to receive reimbursement funds following project completion.
The 2013 Rural Economic Development Grant Program will provide $1.5 million total to fund economic development projects in rural Arizona communities. Applications are due October 1, 2012 and should include a project summary, applicant qualifications, detailed project narrative with timeline and budget, and letters of support. Projects must be completed within 12 months and will be evaluated based on their potential economic impact, leveraged funds, quality of plan, and applicant qualifications. Grantees will receive funding tied to project outcomes and must submit monthly reports on progress.
- The responsibility for selecting consultants and implementing projects lies with the borrower, not the World Bank. The Bank reviews processes to ensure compliance with procedures.
- The Bank publishes standard documents like requests for proposals that borrowers must use, with minimal changes.
- Information about consultant opportunities is published in documents like project appraisal documents and procurement notices. Consultants can seek clarification during the proposal process.
- Confidentiality of proposals is required until contracts are awarded. Consultants can raise issues by writing to borrowers and copying the Bank.
- After contracting, consultants can request debriefings from borrowers and potentially meet with Bank staff.
Guidelines for organize workshop & conference & seminarNursing Path
The document provides guidelines for colleges in organizing conferences, workshops and seminars during India's 12th Five Year Plan (2012-2017). It outlines the objectives to promote knowledge sharing and research. Financial assistance is available for state, national and international level events with ceilings of Rs. 1 lakh, Rs. 1.5 lakh and Rs. 2 lakh respectively. Colleges must apply in the prescribed format to the appropriate UGC regional office for consideration and approval of their event.
This document provides information and instructions for applying for a Great Streets Small Business Capital Improvement Grant from the District of Columbia. Eligible applicants are small business owners or real estate developers located in targeted Great Streets corridors who will use the grant funds for capital improvements. Applicants must meet eligibility criteria and grants of up to $85,000 will be awarded based on an evaluation of the applicant's experience, financial viability, job creation plans, and commitment to using local businesses and contractors. The application process, reimbursement procedures, and insurance requirements are also outlined.
This document outlines procedures for administering loans from IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development). It discusses basic principles like eligible expenditures and disbursement conditions. It describes the letter sent to borrowers and the disbursement handbook, which provide guidelines for withdrawing loan funds. The main disbursement procedures covered are the special/designated account procedure, direct payment procedure, reimbursement procedure, and special commitment procedure. Key aspects like opening and replenishing the designated account, supporting documentation, and recovering the initial deposit are also summarized.
Guidelines for Modified Scheme for setting up of Compound Semiconductors and ...ssuser668a58
The document provides guidelines for the Modified scheme for setting up Compound Semiconductors / Silicon Photonics / Sensors Fab/ Discrete Semiconductors Fab and Semiconductor Assembly, Testing, Marking and Packaging (ATMP)/ Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test (OSAT) facilities in India. It outlines eligibility requirements including minimum capital expenditure thresholds, defines key terms, and describes the application process and parameters for fiscal support of 50% of eligible capital expenditures that will be provided on a pari-passu basis to approved projects.
This document provides information and instructions for applying for the H Street NE Small Business Capital Improvement Grants program. Eligible applicants are small business owners located on the H Street NE corridor who are seeking funds of up to $85,000 for capital improvement projects. The application deadline is February 17, 2014. Applications will be evaluated based on the applicant's experience, financial viability, jobs created for DC residents, and use of local contractors. Applicants must meet eligibility criteria and submit documentation of expenditures and insurance to receive reimbursement funds following project completion.
The 2013 Rural Economic Development Grant Program will provide $1.5 million total to fund economic development projects in rural Arizona communities. Applications are due October 1, 2012 and should include a project summary, applicant qualifications, detailed project narrative with timeline and budget, and letters of support. Projects must be completed within 12 months and will be evaluated based on their potential economic impact, leveraged funds, quality of plan, and applicant qualifications. Grantees will receive funding tied to project outcomes and must submit monthly reports on progress.
- The responsibility for selecting consultants and implementing projects lies with the borrower, not the World Bank. The Bank reviews processes to ensure compliance with procedures.
- The Bank publishes standard documents like requests for proposals that borrowers must use, with minimal changes.
- Information about consultant opportunities is published in documents like project appraisal documents and procurement notices. Consultants can seek clarification during the proposal process.
- Confidentiality of proposals is required until contracts are awarded. Consultants can raise issues by writing to borrowers and copying the Bank.
- After contracting, consultants can request debriefings from borrowers and potentially meet with Bank staff.
The document is a loan agreement letter sent to borrowers that outlines the terms of the loan. It includes 7 articles that cover general provisions, details of the loan, program implementation, reporting requirements, financial reporting, remedies in case of non-compliance, and effectiveness conditions. There are also 4 schedules that provide more details on the program description and goals, allocation and withdrawal of loan proceeds, program implementation plans, and procurement procedures. Attachments to the letter provide forms, guidelines, and checklists to facilitate borrower compliance with withdrawal, disbursement, procurement, and reporting procedures.
This document announces funding opportunities for the Fiscal Year 2022 Department of Defense Multidisciplinary Research Program of the University Research Initiative (MURI). It provides information on 26 research topics across the Office of Naval Research (ONR), Army Research Office (ARO), and Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR). Key dates include a white paper deadline of June 7, 2021 and a proposal deadline of September 27, 2021. Typical awards will be grants of $1.25-1.5 million per year for 5 years, pending appropriations. The program aims to support high-risk basic research involving multiple disciplines that could lead to significant advances for national security.
The document summarizes the Quality- and Cost-Based Selection (QCBS) process for selecting consultants by World Bank borrowers. It outlines the key steps: 1) developing terms of reference and a cost estimate, 2) advertising the project, 3) creating a shortlist of 6 qualified firms, and 4) issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) to the shortlisted firms. The RFP includes the letter of invitation, instructions to consultants, terms of reference, and draft contract. The process aims to select consultants based on both quality of proposal and cost in a competitive and transparent manner.
Introduction to FM and Disbursements (1).pptxUkpevieGrace
The document discusses the financial management arrangements for World Bank operations, including the roles and responsibilities of borrowers and the Bank. Key elements of the borrower's financial management system are outlined, such as budgeting, accounting, financial reporting, funds flow, and internal/external audits. Guidelines are provided for maintaining designated bank accounts, eligible expenditures, disbursement methods and procedures.
Kickoff Adore-it - Intelligent Energy Europeadoreit
The document provides an overview of key contractual and financial topics for projects funded by the Intelligent Energy Europe program. It outlines the roles and responsibilities of coordinators and co-beneficiaries, reporting requirements, payment schemes, eligible costs, and common mistakes to avoid. Project coordinators are responsible for financial and contractual management and reporting, while ensuring collaboration with other relevant projects.
This document establishes the rules and guidelines for submitting proposals to the ASRF (Arab Science Research Foundation). It outlines the call for proposals process, including pre-proposal checks, submission requirements, and eligibility. Key points include:
- Proposals are submitted in response to biannual calls announced on the ASRF website.
- Pre-proposals are initially submitted and selected authors are invited to submit full proposals.
- Proposals must be submitted electronically in English before the deadline.
- Selection is based on excellence, transparency, fairness, confidentiality, efficiency, and ethics.
- Funding between $10,000-$150,000 is typically provided for 1-3 years to support research projects.
Grant Making: Is the process whereby a funder or donor requests for grant applications/proposals through a competitive or non-competitive manner, review such applications/proposals, select the entire or some of the applications/proposals for funding and subsequently process and issue out grant award for each of the applications/proposals selected.
The document summarizes guidelines for the Quality- and Cost-Based Selection (QCBS) method for selecting consultants by World Bank borrowers. It describes key aspects of the selection process including:
- Issuing a Letter of Invitation and Instructions to Consultants to initiate the process and provide selection criteria.
- Receiving and evaluating technical proposals independently of financial proposals based on consultants' experience, methodology, staff qualifications and other factors.
- Opening and evaluating cost proposals for consultants that meet minimum technical scores.
- Combining quality and cost scores, with typically 80% weight on quality and 20% on cost, to select the highest ranked consultant for contract negotiations.
This document provides an overview and instructions for submitting grant applications through Grants.gov. It discusses:
1) What Grants.gov is and when to use it for submitting federal grant applications.
2) The two options - using Adobe PDF forms or the SAGE Grant Runner system - for completing application forms and assembling materials.
3) The process at the University of Washington for routing applications through the Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) prior to formal submission through Grants.gov.
The document provides guidance on grant development and management processes for local NGOs in West Ethiopia. It discusses key topics such as conceptualizing grants, the grant lifecycle from the perspective of both grant makers and recipients, prerequisites for obtaining grants, types of grants, seeking grants proactively or reactively, and the grant proposal writing process. The three main stages of the grant management process for grant makers are presented as the pre-award, award, and post-award stages. For grant recipients, the key aspects include meeting grant requirements, reporting on progress and results, and closing out the grant. Detailed steps are provided for activities in each stage to help NGOs effectively develop, obtain, and manage grants.
This document provides guidance on designing and managing EU-funded grant schemes. It discusses the key stages in the grant cycle including operational programming, evaluation, contracting and monitoring. It also covers important considerations for grant scheme design such as eligibility criteria, evaluation methodology, and types of support provided to applicants. The goal is to help ensure grant funding achieves its objectives in an efficient, transparent and impartial manner.
The CMS Innovation Center held the eighth in a series of webinars about the Health Care Innovation Awards Round Two on Wednesday, July 24, 2013 from 1:00–2:00pm EDT to provide technical assistance on submitting an application.
- - -
CMS Innovations
http://innovations.cms.gov
We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy:
http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/comment_policy.html
CMS Privacy Policy
http://cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Aboutwebsite/Privacy-Policy.html
Our business proposal is to provide our clients with a cost-effective solution to promote their pension plans without having to engage in a legal and administrative structure, significantly increased by recent regulation. This allows them to concentrate exclusively in the marketing activity of their pension plans.
Benefactor is a grant management software designed for grant makers that allows users to manage all aspects of the grant making process. It can be configured to match an organization's specific terminology and process. The software allows users to manage applications, payments, reports, and access permissions. Support includes a help desk and training to help users utilize all of Benefactor's features.
The document is a bid document for appointing a third party inspection agency to conduct quality control inspections of projects executed by central and state government utilities using PSDF grants throughout India. The scope of work includes inspecting substation and transmission line equipment at various voltage levels, as well as other project works. The inspection agency will be required to inspect sites, collect documents, verify quantities, and submit inspection reports. The contract period is initially for 2 years, and may be extended for another 2 years.
The document summarizes an Erasmus+ start up seminar held in Birmingham on September 10, 2015. The seminar provided information on managing Erasmus+ Key Action 3 grants, including an overview of the grant agreement and annexes, eligible costs and amendments, monitoring requirements, reporting procedures and available IT tools. Presenters also discussed disseminating project results and additional support available through networks like Eurodesk and transnational cooperation activities. The goal was to help attendees understand the grant management process and requirements to successfully implement their Erasmus+ projects.
4. Stay on track- communication and amendments updated april 2014Raffaella Battella
This document provides guidance on communications, amendments to grant agreements, and penalties for projects funded by the EU Commission's Directorate General for Competition. It outlines the typical project lifecycle from proposal to final report. It emphasizes maintaining regular communication with project managers and financial officers. Amendments to the grant agreement require prior written approval, and changes cannot undermine the original award decision. Penalties like reducing the grant may be issued if a project is poorly, partially, or late implemented. The document reviews elements of the grant agreement including the maximum funding amount, payment arrangements, and special provisions. It stresses the importance of complying with financial and visibility rules.
1. This document summarizes a webinar about developing a Galileo-based timing receiver prototype for critical infrastructures. The webinar covers the call background, objectives, eligibility, proposal requirements, evaluation criteria, budget and timeline.
2. The call aims to fund the development of a Galileo receiver prototype that can provide accurate and robust timing for critical infrastructure applications. The receiver must be configurable for Galileo System Time and UTC using Galileo signals.
3. Eligible participants are legal entities and individuals from EU member states, Switzerland and Norway that are active in GNSS development. The maximum budget is €3.5 million to fund up to two projects of up to €1.75 million each.
Slope wp9 - task 9.2, overview on the finacial guidelines by GraphitechSLOPE Project
The document provides an overview of key financial guidelines and obligations for beneficiaries and coordinators under an EU grant agreement. It discusses topics such as signature and start date, reporting periods, bank account requirements, obligations of coordinators and beneficiaries, eligible and non-eligible costs, payment modalities, budget transfers, reporting, and audit certificates. The coordinator acts as an intermediary between the EU and beneficiaries, receives and distributes funding, monitors compliance, and reviews reports. Beneficiaries must inform the coordinator of staff changes, provide needed data, and attend meetings. Costs must be eligible, identifiable, verified and incurred during the project duration.
The document is a loan agreement letter sent to borrowers that outlines the terms of the loan. It includes 7 articles that cover general provisions, details of the loan, program implementation, reporting requirements, financial reporting, remedies in case of non-compliance, and effectiveness conditions. There are also 4 schedules that provide more details on the program description and goals, allocation and withdrawal of loan proceeds, program implementation plans, and procurement procedures. Attachments to the letter provide forms, guidelines, and checklists to facilitate borrower compliance with withdrawal, disbursement, procurement, and reporting procedures.
This document announces funding opportunities for the Fiscal Year 2022 Department of Defense Multidisciplinary Research Program of the University Research Initiative (MURI). It provides information on 26 research topics across the Office of Naval Research (ONR), Army Research Office (ARO), and Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR). Key dates include a white paper deadline of June 7, 2021 and a proposal deadline of September 27, 2021. Typical awards will be grants of $1.25-1.5 million per year for 5 years, pending appropriations. The program aims to support high-risk basic research involving multiple disciplines that could lead to significant advances for national security.
The document summarizes the Quality- and Cost-Based Selection (QCBS) process for selecting consultants by World Bank borrowers. It outlines the key steps: 1) developing terms of reference and a cost estimate, 2) advertising the project, 3) creating a shortlist of 6 qualified firms, and 4) issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) to the shortlisted firms. The RFP includes the letter of invitation, instructions to consultants, terms of reference, and draft contract. The process aims to select consultants based on both quality of proposal and cost in a competitive and transparent manner.
Introduction to FM and Disbursements (1).pptxUkpevieGrace
The document discusses the financial management arrangements for World Bank operations, including the roles and responsibilities of borrowers and the Bank. Key elements of the borrower's financial management system are outlined, such as budgeting, accounting, financial reporting, funds flow, and internal/external audits. Guidelines are provided for maintaining designated bank accounts, eligible expenditures, disbursement methods and procedures.
Kickoff Adore-it - Intelligent Energy Europeadoreit
The document provides an overview of key contractual and financial topics for projects funded by the Intelligent Energy Europe program. It outlines the roles and responsibilities of coordinators and co-beneficiaries, reporting requirements, payment schemes, eligible costs, and common mistakes to avoid. Project coordinators are responsible for financial and contractual management and reporting, while ensuring collaboration with other relevant projects.
This document establishes the rules and guidelines for submitting proposals to the ASRF (Arab Science Research Foundation). It outlines the call for proposals process, including pre-proposal checks, submission requirements, and eligibility. Key points include:
- Proposals are submitted in response to biannual calls announced on the ASRF website.
- Pre-proposals are initially submitted and selected authors are invited to submit full proposals.
- Proposals must be submitted electronically in English before the deadline.
- Selection is based on excellence, transparency, fairness, confidentiality, efficiency, and ethics.
- Funding between $10,000-$150,000 is typically provided for 1-3 years to support research projects.
Grant Making: Is the process whereby a funder or donor requests for grant applications/proposals through a competitive or non-competitive manner, review such applications/proposals, select the entire or some of the applications/proposals for funding and subsequently process and issue out grant award for each of the applications/proposals selected.
The document summarizes guidelines for the Quality- and Cost-Based Selection (QCBS) method for selecting consultants by World Bank borrowers. It describes key aspects of the selection process including:
- Issuing a Letter of Invitation and Instructions to Consultants to initiate the process and provide selection criteria.
- Receiving and evaluating technical proposals independently of financial proposals based on consultants' experience, methodology, staff qualifications and other factors.
- Opening and evaluating cost proposals for consultants that meet minimum technical scores.
- Combining quality and cost scores, with typically 80% weight on quality and 20% on cost, to select the highest ranked consultant for contract negotiations.
This document provides an overview and instructions for submitting grant applications through Grants.gov. It discusses:
1) What Grants.gov is and when to use it for submitting federal grant applications.
2) The two options - using Adobe PDF forms or the SAGE Grant Runner system - for completing application forms and assembling materials.
3) The process at the University of Washington for routing applications through the Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) prior to formal submission through Grants.gov.
The document provides guidance on grant development and management processes for local NGOs in West Ethiopia. It discusses key topics such as conceptualizing grants, the grant lifecycle from the perspective of both grant makers and recipients, prerequisites for obtaining grants, types of grants, seeking grants proactively or reactively, and the grant proposal writing process. The three main stages of the grant management process for grant makers are presented as the pre-award, award, and post-award stages. For grant recipients, the key aspects include meeting grant requirements, reporting on progress and results, and closing out the grant. Detailed steps are provided for activities in each stage to help NGOs effectively develop, obtain, and manage grants.
This document provides guidance on designing and managing EU-funded grant schemes. It discusses the key stages in the grant cycle including operational programming, evaluation, contracting and monitoring. It also covers important considerations for grant scheme design such as eligibility criteria, evaluation methodology, and types of support provided to applicants. The goal is to help ensure grant funding achieves its objectives in an efficient, transparent and impartial manner.
The CMS Innovation Center held the eighth in a series of webinars about the Health Care Innovation Awards Round Two on Wednesday, July 24, 2013 from 1:00–2:00pm EDT to provide technical assistance on submitting an application.
- - -
CMS Innovations
http://innovations.cms.gov
We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy:
http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/comment_policy.html
CMS Privacy Policy
http://cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Aboutwebsite/Privacy-Policy.html
Our business proposal is to provide our clients with a cost-effective solution to promote their pension plans without having to engage in a legal and administrative structure, significantly increased by recent regulation. This allows them to concentrate exclusively in the marketing activity of their pension plans.
Benefactor is a grant management software designed for grant makers that allows users to manage all aspects of the grant making process. It can be configured to match an organization's specific terminology and process. The software allows users to manage applications, payments, reports, and access permissions. Support includes a help desk and training to help users utilize all of Benefactor's features.
The document is a bid document for appointing a third party inspection agency to conduct quality control inspections of projects executed by central and state government utilities using PSDF grants throughout India. The scope of work includes inspecting substation and transmission line equipment at various voltage levels, as well as other project works. The inspection agency will be required to inspect sites, collect documents, verify quantities, and submit inspection reports. The contract period is initially for 2 years, and may be extended for another 2 years.
The document summarizes an Erasmus+ start up seminar held in Birmingham on September 10, 2015. The seminar provided information on managing Erasmus+ Key Action 3 grants, including an overview of the grant agreement and annexes, eligible costs and amendments, monitoring requirements, reporting procedures and available IT tools. Presenters also discussed disseminating project results and additional support available through networks like Eurodesk and transnational cooperation activities. The goal was to help attendees understand the grant management process and requirements to successfully implement their Erasmus+ projects.
4. Stay on track- communication and amendments updated april 2014Raffaella Battella
This document provides guidance on communications, amendments to grant agreements, and penalties for projects funded by the EU Commission's Directorate General for Competition. It outlines the typical project lifecycle from proposal to final report. It emphasizes maintaining regular communication with project managers and financial officers. Amendments to the grant agreement require prior written approval, and changes cannot undermine the original award decision. Penalties like reducing the grant may be issued if a project is poorly, partially, or late implemented. The document reviews elements of the grant agreement including the maximum funding amount, payment arrangements, and special provisions. It stresses the importance of complying with financial and visibility rules.
1. This document summarizes a webinar about developing a Galileo-based timing receiver prototype for critical infrastructures. The webinar covers the call background, objectives, eligibility, proposal requirements, evaluation criteria, budget and timeline.
2. The call aims to fund the development of a Galileo receiver prototype that can provide accurate and robust timing for critical infrastructure applications. The receiver must be configurable for Galileo System Time and UTC using Galileo signals.
3. Eligible participants are legal entities and individuals from EU member states, Switzerland and Norway that are active in GNSS development. The maximum budget is €3.5 million to fund up to two projects of up to €1.75 million each.
Slope wp9 - task 9.2, overview on the finacial guidelines by GraphitechSLOPE Project
The document provides an overview of key financial guidelines and obligations for beneficiaries and coordinators under an EU grant agreement. It discusses topics such as signature and start date, reporting periods, bank account requirements, obligations of coordinators and beneficiaries, eligible and non-eligible costs, payment modalities, budget transfers, reporting, and audit certificates. The coordinator acts as an intermediary between the EU and beneficiaries, receives and distributes funding, monitors compliance, and reviews reports. Beneficiaries must inform the coordinator of staff changes, provide needed data, and attend meetings. Costs must be eligible, identifiable, verified and incurred during the project duration.
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024Bruce Bennett
This webinar is an in-depth review of the interview process. Preparation is a key element to acing an interview. Learn the best approaches from the initial phone screen to the face-to-face meeting with the hiring manager. You will hear great answers to several standard questions, including the dreaded “Tell Me About Yourself”.
Success is often not achievable without facing and overcoming obstacles along the way. To reach our goals and achieve success, it is important to understand and resolve the obstacles that come in our way.
In this article, we will discuss the various obstacles that hinder success, strategies to overcome them, and examples of individuals who have successfully surmounted their obstacles.
Joyce M Sullivan, Founder & CEO of SocMediaFin, Inc. shares her "Five Questions - The Story of You", "Reflections - What Matters to You?" and "The Three Circle Exercise" to guide those evaluating what their next move may be in their careers.
In the intricate tapestry of life, connections serve as the vibrant threads that weave together opportunities, experiences, and growth. Whether in personal or professional spheres, the ability to forge meaningful connections opens doors to a multitude of possibilities, propelling individuals toward success and fulfillment.
Eirini is an HR professional with strong passion for technology and semiconductors industry in particular. She started her career as a software recruiter in 2012, and developed an interest for business development, talent enablement and innovation which later got her setting up the concept of Software Community Management in ASML, and to Developer Relations today. She holds a bachelor degree in Lifelong Learning and an MBA specialised in Strategic Human Resources Management. She is a world citizen, having grown up in Greece, she studied and kickstarted her career in The Netherlands and can currently be found in Santa Clara, CA.
We recently hosted the much-anticipated Community Skill Builders Workshop during our June online meeting. This event was a culmination of six months of listening to your feedback and crafting solutions to better support your PMI journey. Here’s a look back at what happened and the exciting developments that emerged from our collaborative efforts.
A Gathering of Minds
We were thrilled to see a diverse group of attendees, including local certified PMI trainers and both new and experienced members eager to contribute their perspectives. The workshop was structured into three dynamic discussion sessions, each led by our dedicated membership advocates.
Key Takeaways and Future Directions
The insights and feedback gathered from these discussions were invaluable. Here are some of the key takeaways and the steps we are taking to address them:
• Enhanced Resource Accessibility: We are working on a new, user-friendly resource page that will make it easier for members to access training materials and real-world application guides.
• Structured Mentorship Program: Plans are underway to launch a mentorship program that will connect members with experienced professionals for guidance and support.
• Increased Networking Opportunities: Expect to see more frequent and varied networking events, both virtual and in-person, to help you build connections and foster a sense of community.
Moving Forward
We are committed to turning your feedback into actionable solutions that enhance your PMI journey. This workshop was just the beginning. By actively participating and sharing your experiences, you have helped shape the future of our Chapter’s offerings.
Thank you to everyone who attended and contributed to the success of the Community Skill Builders Workshop. Your engagement and enthusiasm are what make our Chapter strong and vibrant. Stay tuned for updates on the new initiatives and opportunities to get involved. Together, we are building a community that supports and empowers each other on our PMI journeys.
Stay connected, stay engaged, and let’s continue to grow together!
About PMI Silver Spring Chapter
We are a branch of the Project Management Institute. We offer a platform for project management professionals in Silver Spring, MD, and the DC/Baltimore metro area. Monthly meetings facilitate networking, knowledge sharing, and professional development. For more, visit pmissc.org.
2. 2
CONTENTS
1. Introduction......................................................................................................... 3
1.1. Key players.............................................................................................................................. 3
2. process overview................................................................................................ 4
2.1. Applicant creates a Grant application ..................................................................................... 4
2.2. Approval /rejection of the application on behalf of the MC ................................................... 10
2.3. The GH manager sends the applicant the Grant Notification Letter..................................... 11
2.4. Grantee uploads the report and Grant Awarding Coordinator approves. ............................. 14
2.5. Grant Awarding Coordinator approves/rejects the report ..................................................... 16
2.6. The GH manager makes the payment of the Grant.............................................................. 17
3. 3
1. INTRODUCTION
This document describes the Grant Awarding process as implemented in e-COST, from the moment
an applicant submits an application for approval by the Grant Awarding Coordinator to the payment
and recording of the amount paid by the Grant Holder manager (GHM) to the grantee. The applicant
can draft and submit an application for either a Short-term Scientific Mission (STSM), Virtual Mobility
(VM), Virtual Networking Support (VNS), ITC Conference or Dissemination Conference, the process
for all types of grants is similar.
1.1. Key players
Grant Applicant
Grant Awarding Coordinator
Action Chair
Action Vice Chair
Leadership Positions
Grant Holder Manager (GHM)
Short Term Scientific Mission (STSM), Virtual Mobility, Virtual Networking
Support and Dissemination Conference Grant Applicant
The Grant applicant(s) are Action participants with a primary affiliation to a legal entity located in a
COST Full or Cooperating Member country, a COST Near Neighbour Country or a European RTD
Organisation.
Template:
https://www.cost.eu/STSM_GrantApplication
https://www.cost.eu/STSM_Report
https://www.cost.eu/VM_GrantApplication
https://www.cost.eu/VM_Report
https://www.cost.eu/DisseminationConference_GrantApplication
https://www.cost.eu/DisseminationConference_Report
https://www.cost.eu/VNS_GrantApplication
https://www.cost.eu/VNS_Report
ITC Conference Grant Applicant
The ITC Conference Grant Applicant(s) are Young Researchers and Innovators affiliated in an
Inclusiveness Target Country (ITC) or Near Neighbour Country.
Template:
https://www.cost.eu/ITCConference_GrantApplication
https://www.cost.eu/ITCConference_Report
4. 4
Grant Awarding Coordinator
The Grant Awarding Coordinator is the person appointed by the Action Management Committee (MC)
charged to coordinate and approve on behalf of the Acton MC the awarding of all types of grants for
supporting the mobility of Researchers and Innovators and the presentation of Action results at a
conference organised by a third party (further details are provided in the Annotated Rules)
Action Chair
In the absence of a Grant Awarding Coordinator, the Action Chair acts as default Grant Awarding
Coordinator on behalf of the Action Management Committee (MC) consequently can, on behalf of the
Action Management Committee (MC) approve/reject grant applications.
Action Vice Chair
The Action Vice Chair has access to the monitoring of Grant applications, can download applications
supporting documentation and receives a copy of relevant notifications.
Leadership Positions
The Leadership Positions have access to the monitoring of Grant applications and can download
applications supporting documentation.
Grant Holder Manager
The GH manager monitors the incoming approved grant applications, determines the Grant amount in
accordance with the request, but also with the budget available, sends the successful applicants their
Grant Notification letter and ensures that all grants are paid within the deadline for payment.
In the absence of a Grant Awarding Coordinator, the Grant Holder Manager can on behalf of the Action
Management Committee (MC) approve/reject grant applications.
2. PROCESS OVERVIEW
2.1. Applicant creates a Grant application
The applicant encodes a grant application by logging into e-COST and clicking on the Grant
Applications tab.
Any already existing applications are available for consultation in the Grant Applications Monitoring. To
encode a new application, the applicant clicks on ‘Apply for grant’.
5. 5
The applicant can select the grant from the page ‘Apply for new grant’
For each type of grant an application form will contain different sections, some are pre-filled by e-COST
such as Applicant name or Primary Affiliation, others are mandatory to be filled.
Grant applications require an active Action Grant Period.
Short Term Scientific Mission (STSM) – Application page
8. 8
After encoding the Grant application form by filling all above-mentioned sections, the applicant also
needs to upload the actual application template completed which shall be previously downloaded from
the application page.
The applicant will need to upload additional supporting documentation for each type of grant.
STSM – supporting documentation
STSM grant Application (based on e-COST template)
Confirmation of the host on the agreement from the host institution in receiving the applicant
Other documents required by the Action
Virtual Mobility – supporting documentation
Virtual Mobility grant Application (based on e-COST template)
Other documents required by the Action
Virtual Networking Support – supporting documentation
Virtual Networking Support grant Application (based on e-COST template)
Other documents required by the Action
Dissemination Conference – supporting documentation
Dissemination conference grant application (based on e-COST template)
Copy of the abstract of the accepted oral presentation
Acceptance (or invitation) letter from the conference organisers
Other documents required by the Action
ITC Conference – supporting documentation
ITC Conference grant application (based on e-COST template)
Copy of the abstract of the accepted oral or poster presentation
Acceptance letter from the conference organisers
Other documents required by the Action
9. 9
After adding the supporting document(s), the applicant can submit the grant application.
The application status will change from draft to submitted. Prior to approval of the application, if need
be, the applicant will be able to revise the application.
10. 10
2.2. Approval /rejection of the application on behalf of the MC
As soon as the Grant application is submitted, the Grant Awarding Coordinator is notified. The applicant,
Action Chair and Vice Chair also receive a copy of the notification.
Alternatively, the status of the applications can be consulted via the Grant Applications Monitoring.
The Grant Awarding Coordinator will be able to review and approve/reject the Grant application on
behalf of the MC. In case of rejection, a justification needs to be encoded. The justification will be
included in the e-notification to the applicant.
11. 11
Upon approval, the Grant application status will change from submitted to pre-approved.
2.3. The GH manager sends the applicant the Grant Notification
Letter
As soon as the Grant Awarding Coordinator approved the Grant application, the GH manager is notified
and can send the Grant Letter notification. The Action Chair and Vice Chair also receive a copy of the
e-notification.
The GH manager follows the link provided in the notification and logs into e-cost. The GH manager can
send the grant letter to the grantee.
12. 12
Upon sending of the grant letter, the status of the Grant application will change from pre-approved to
Grant Letter sent.
13. 13
The grant letter notification is sent to the applicant. The GH manager and the Grant Awarding
Coordinator will be in copy of the notification.
The Grant Letter outlines the rights and duties of the grantee and of the Grant Holder.
14. 14
2.4. Grantee uploads the report and Grant Awarding Coordinator
approves.
1 day and 10 days after the end of the grant, the grantee receives a reminder to upload the report.
The deadline to submit the report is 30 days from the end of the activity, within 15 days from the end
date of the Grant Period or within a shorter timeframe as per Grant Holder/ Grant Awarding
Coordinator’s request to meet reporting deadlines.
The grantee receives an e-notification to submit the report and other supporting documents on e-
COST, the GH manager and the Grant Awarding Coordinator will be in copy of the notification.
15. 15
The grantee must complete the report template, upload, and submit it in e-COST along with additional
supporting documents if applicable, for each type of grant.
STSM – supporting documentation
Report template
Other documents (if required by the Action)
Virtual Mobility – supporting documentation
Report template
Other documents (if required by the Action)
Virtual Networking Support – supporting documentation
Report template
Other documents (if required by the Action)
Dissemination Conference – supporting documentation
Report template
Certificate of attendance
Programme of the conference or book of abstracts / proceedings indicating the oral presentation
Copy of the given presentation
Other documents (if required by the Action)
ITC Conference – supporting documentation
Report template
Certificate of attendance
Programme of the conference or book of abstracts / proceedings indicating the presentation
(oral or poster)
Copy of the given presentation (oral or poster)
Other documents (if required by the Action)
The status of the application changes from Grant letter sent to Report submitted.
16. 16
Upon submission of the grant report, an e-notification is sent to the Grant Awarding Coordinator and a
copy to the grantee, Action Chair and Vice Chair.
2.5. Grant Awarding Coordinator approves/rejects the report
The Grant Awarding Coordinator is notified when the grantee submitted the report and must verify the
validity and content of the report by clicking the link in the notification. Alternatively, the report can be
accessed from the Monitoring Grant Applications.
After review of the report by the procedures agreed by the MC, the Grant Awarding Coordinator needs
to encode its approval or rejection on behalf of the MC.
17. 17
If rejected, a justification is required and its content will be included in the e-notification to the grantee,
who is asked to revise and re-submit the report. In this case, the status of the application goes back to
Grant letter sent.
If the Grant Awarding Coordinator approves the report, the application status changes to Report
Approved and the GH manager is notified that the grant can be paid. The applicant, Action Chair and
Vice Chair receive a copy of the e-notification.
2.6. The GH manager makes the payment of the Grant
Following the link in the e-notification, the GH manager reaches the Grants page from which grant
payments can be recorded.
The GH manager can download an excel list of grants that are ready to be paid via the Export all
applications. This list contains the necessary information for the GH financial and accounting
department to process the Grant transfer.
18. 18
Once the GH financial and accounting department processed the Grant transfer, the GH manager can
record the payment and complete the grant process.
Upon the recording of the payment, an e-notification is sent to the grantee, with a copy to the GH
manager.