The document summarizes the efforts of the Google QC group at Kathmandu University High School to address the problem of wastage of paper. The group identified wastage of paper as a key issue through surveys and analysis. They implemented solutions like awareness campaigns, strict monitoring, and recycling to reduce paper wastage. Observations showed less paper being wasted after the group's interventions.

1. The Google QC
Kathmandu University High School

2. KATHMANDU UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL
Founded in 1998, Kathmandu University High School is initiated by Kathmandu University.
Located in the beautiful out hills of Dhulikhel it has a very enchanting scenes of the
mountains. With the total of 550 students , each class has 30 students in primary section
and 60 students in secondary section. It also has A -level comprising of 100 students.
Apart from education our school also has hostel facilities for the students living in
Kathmandu area.

3. Team Members
• Chandan Thakur
• Sonia Thebe
• Samip Pokharel
• Rojan Bajgain
• Naman Koju
• Bishal Thapa
• Sophin Dahal
• Pratik Sapkota

4. Brainstorming for Group Name
Super
Solvers
Avengers Unity
Reality
Reality Google QC
The Giant Path Finders
Rangers

5. Circle Info
• Group Name: Google QC
• Constituted on: 3rd Sept 2011
• Average Age: 14rs
• Working Days: Wednesday and Thursday
• Meet-Up Time: 2:40 to 3:40 PM
• Co-ordinators: Mr.Narad Rijal and Mr.Umesh
Timalsina

6. Brainstorming I For Problem Identification
• Lack of Computer Appliances • Improper Uniform
(Gadgets)
• Unqualified Teachers
• Lack of Hostel Facilities
• Less Musical Instruments
• Lack of Classroom Displays
• Poor English
• Overuse of Cosmetics
• Lack of Punctuality
• Lack of Projector
• Lack of Educational Tours
• Slow Internet
• Wastage of Paper
• Bullying
• Stress of Homework
• Groupism
• Lack of Practical Knowledge
• Lack of Furniture
• Unqualified Cooks
• Noisy Assembly
• Lack of Eco-Friendly Environment
• Less Books in Library
• Lack of Care
• Wastage of Paper

7. Important Dates
Date Venue Time Work
3rd Sept 2011 KUHS 2:40 Circle formation
16th – 18th Sept 2011 KUHS 2:40 Brainstorming session for Problem
26th Nov-4th Dec 2011 KUHS 2:40 Observation and analysis of the
Problem
11th-15th Dec 2011 KUHS 2:40 Planning strategies and
implementing it
15th – 23rd Dec 2011 KUHS 2:40 Observation of implemented
strategies
2nd Feb – 28th Feb 2012 KUHS 2:40 Discussing on the benefits of the
projects
25th April- 19th May 2012 KUHS 2:40 Checking

8. Stratification of Problems
A B C
Lack of classroom display Overuse of cosmetics Lack of computer
Noisy assembly  Bullying appliances
Wastage of Food Groupism Lack of hostel
Wastage of Paper Poor English facilities
Lack of eco-friendly Improper uniform Lack of projector
environment Lack of punctuality Slow internet
Stress of homework Less books in
Lack of care library
Unqualified
teachers
Lack of educational
tours
Less musical
instruments
Lack of practical
knowledge
Lack of furniture
A- Students can solve B- Students can solve with C- Students cannot
themselves an external Help solve them at all.

9. Finalized Problems for Brainstorming II
• Wastage of Paper
• Misuse of Paper
• Lack of Classroom Displays
• Violation of School Rules
• Misuse of First-Aid Room
• Disobeying Teachers
• Bunking
• Overuse of Deodorants
• Lack of respect to Volunteers
• Polluted Classroom Environment

10. Study Group for Problem Selection
• Class 4 and 5 (30 Students each)
• Class 6-10 (60 Students each)
• Total- 360 Students
Kathmandu University High School

11. Problem Prioritization
Problem Wastage of Bunking Violation of Lack of respect Polluted
Paper School rules to volunteers Classroom
Environment
Class 4 7 4 2 3 3
Class 5 6 7 4 6 2
Class 6 4 6 7 6 7
Class 7 8 4 3 5 5
Class 8 9 3 5 5 6
Class 9 7 5 7 7 4
Class 10 4 3 6 6 4
Total 45 32 34 38 31

12. Pareto Matrix
Problem no. Total Cumulative Total Cumulative
Frequency Frequency Frequency % Frequency %
Problem 1 45 45 22.05 % 22.05 %
Problem 2 42 87 20.59 % 42.64 %
Problem 3 41 128 20.10 % 62.74 %
Problem 4 38 166 18.63 % 81.37 %
Problem 5 38 204 18.63 % 100.00 %
1- Wastage of Paper 2- Bunking
3- Polluted Classroom Environment 4- Violation of School rules
5- Lack of respect to volunteers

13. Total Marks Problem Pareto Diagram
Cumulative %

14. Selected Problem
Wastage of Paper

15. Wastage of Paper
Despite the providence, many people in the world are not
able to educate themselves and we who are able to study
are misusing the
We should know about the importance of Paper and also
know the harmful disease we might get if we do not get
proper diet.
We the students who are the future and the pillars of our
nation must know the consequences of wasting Paper and
the problems we might face in future, we also must make
others aware about wasting Paper to make better future.

16. Causes Of Problem
• Negligence • Lack of Awareness
• Lack of Strict Rules • Daily Habit of Throwing Paper
• Over Freedom • Lack of Discipline
• Using Paper beyond need • Lack of Consciousness
• Unhygienic Utensils • Lack of Guidance
• Lack of Tasty Paper • Lack of quality paper
• Excessiveness of Paper • Paper Fighting Habit of
• Lack of Paper Management Students
• Giving more copies
• Disobedience
• Bad Company

17. Stratification of Causes
A B C
 Negligence Lack of Strict Rules Over Freedom
 More Paper and Fun Unhygienic Utensils Unqualified Cooks
 Using Paper beyond need Lack of Tasty Paper Excessiveness of Paper
 Disobedience Arrogant Cooks Lack of Paper
 Daily Habit of Throwing Giving more copies Management
 Paper Unhygienic Lack of right size of
 Lack of Discipline Environment in Dinning copies
 Lack of Consciousness Hall Lack of Paper based
 Lack of quality paper Compulsion Knowledge
 Throwing papers Lack of Awareness
 Unnecessarily Lack of Guidance
Polluting environment by Lack of Pre-Plans
throwing wasted Paper in Lack of electronic
public area gadgets

A- Students can solve B- Students can sole with C- Students cannot solve
themselves an external help them at all.

18. Ishikawa Diagram
Method Man
Giving more copies Paper fighting habit of
students
Lack of Lack of Negligence
Paper based guidance Using Paper
knowledge beyond need Excessiveness of Paper
Lack of pre-plans
Lack of Paper
management Wastage of Paper
Lack of Damaged Using
electronic Materials Paper
gadgets Lack of unnecessarily
Lack of right quality
size of copies paper Over
freedom
Material Environment

19. Why-Why Analysis
S.N Causes Chance Cause Assignable Validity
Cause Yes No
1 Giving more copies √ √
2 Lack of guidance √ √
3 Lack of Paper based knowledge √ √
4 Lack of pre-plans √ √
5 Lack of electronic gadgets √ √
6 Lack of right size of copies √ √
7 Lack of quality paper √ √
8 Damaged Materials √ √
9 Using Paper beyond need √ √
10 Negligence √ √
11 Paper fighting habit of students √ √
12 Excessiveness of Paper √ √
13 Daily habit of throwing Paper √ √
14 Throwing papers unnecessarily √ √
15 Over freedom √ √

20. Cause Prioritization
Using Paper Unhygienic Daily Habit of Paper Throwing
Member beyond need Utensils Throwing Fighting Habit papers
Paper of Students unnecessaril
y
Samip 5 8 4 6 7
Chandan 4 7 6 6 8
Naman 5 7 6 7 5
Pratik 2 9 4 5 7
Sophin 3 8 7 4 5
Rojan 6 9 6 5 7
Sonia 3 9 4 7 6
Bishal 3 9 4 3 7
Total 31 66 41 43 52

21. Causes Pareto Matrix
Total Cumulative Total Cumulative
S.N Causes Frequency Frequency Frequency Frequency
% %
1. Using Paper beyond need 66 66 24.90 % 24.90 %
2. Damaged Papers 60 126 22.64 % 47.54 %
3. Daily Habit of wasting 52 178 19.62 % 67.96 %
Paper
4. Paper Fighting Habit of 44 222 16.60 % 83.76 %
Students
5. Throwing papers 43 265 16.24 % 100.00 %
unnecessarily

22. Cause Pareto Diagram
Cumulative%
Total Marks
66 60
52
44 43
Problem no. 1 Problem no. 2 Problem no. 3 Problem no. 4 Problem no. 5

23. Observation (Initial)
Days Wastage of Wastage of Wastage of Wastage of Pasta
papers Bitten Rice Spinach
Monday Nil
Tuesday Nil
Wednesday Nil
Thursday Nil Nil
Friday Nil Nil

24. Survey
• Do you think that our School provides Quality Paper?
• Do you think our school students Waste Paper?
• Do you think our school’s Paper is qualitative?
• Are you aware of Wastage of Paper?
• What is the value of Paper in your opinion?
• ---------------------------------------------------
• In your Opinion which is the most Wasted Paper in our School?
• ----------------------------------------------------
• Do you think our Survey will make any change?

25. Survey Results
S.N Question Yes No
1 Do you think that our school provides quality 82.81 17.18
Paper?
2 Do you think that our school students waste 36.71 63.28
Paper?
3 Do you think that our school is not concerned 71.87 28.90
with the wastage of paper?
4 Are you aware of Wastage of Paper? 67.18 32.81
5 Do you think our survey will make any 59.25 40.75
change?

26. Data Collection :
90
80
70
60
50
Yes
40
No
30
20
10
0
Question no.1 Question no.2 Question no.3 Question no.4

27. Do you think that our School provides Quality
Paper?
17%
Yes
No
82%

28. Do you think that our school students waste Paper?
36%
Yes
63% No

29. Do you think that our school Paper is qualitative?
28%
Yes
No
71%

30. Are you aware of Wastage of Paper?
32%
Yes
67% No

31. Problem Analysis
• After our surveys and observation we were surprised
by the Wastage of Paper done by the students.
• Students were wasting Paper as it has no
importance.
• They were not much aware about the crisis of Paper
in the world and wasting Paper as their wish.

32. Solution
• Volunteers for the classrooms and activities
time.
• Awareness of importance of Paper.
• Strict rules.
• Proper guidance.
• Not giving unnecessary copies.
• Not serving copies beyond need.
• Recycling Paper

33. 5Ws 1h
• Making students aware of not wasting Paper with strict monitoring and proper
What guidance.
• During School hours and Activities.
When
• In Classes and Sorrunding.
Where
• Class 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10
Whom
• To create awareness among students.
Why • To reduce “Wastage of Paper”
• By Keeping Volunteers.
How

34. Implementation
Saying “Not To Throw
Paper”
Awaring the student

35. Implementation
Less Wastage of Paper
Supervision by a
student volunteer
saying not to waste
Paper.

36. Implementation
Rules made by the SQC
members:-
Do not take copies beyond
need
Do not misuse the papers
and copies given by School
Do not ask copies
unnecessarily.
Do not throw trashes of
paper.
Utilize the copy in a proper
manner

37. Observation (Final)
Days Wastage of Wastage of Wastage of Wastage of
papers newspaper Chartpaper Newsletter
Monday Nil
Tuesday Nil
Wednesday Nil
Thursday Nil Nil
Friday Nil Nil

38. Comparison (Before & After)
Before After
Students were not aware about the Students were conscious about the
importance of Paper Importance of Paper
Huge amount of papers were wasted Less amount of papers were wasted.
Strict rules related to Wastage of Paper Strict rules were made.
were not implemented.
Before our case study, the students were After our case study ,the students became
arrogant. less arrogant.

39. Comparison (Before & After)
Days Before After
Monday 55.93% 44.06%
Tuesday 60.37% 39.62%
Wednesday 60.00% 40.00%
Thursday 56.25% 43.75%
Friday 65.51% 34.48%

40. Gains: Tangible And Intangible
While Implementing our plans for Wastage of Paper, we
saw many positive changes which proved detrimental
to our school. They are as follows:
Tangible Intangible
 Fresh environment  School saved a lot of Money
 Wastage of Paper was not seen  Students got concerned about
much
the importance of Paper
 The environment of the dining
hall was more hygienic than
usual.

41. Suggestions For the Long Term
• Raising awareness campaign.
• Appointing volunteers.
• Changing the current Paper distribution system
• Implementing New Plans in School
• Putting the consequences of Wastage of Paper
in a important matter or problem.

42. Conclusion
• After our case study we have got in a conclusion that
we have been able to make the students aware
about the consequences about Wastage of Paper.
• We have made students aware about the Wastage of
Paper. We have also awareness campaigns.
• This has all been possible by the implementation of
the case study.