GROUP LEGIBLE
Group Members
Blessing Ndlovu
Nyaradzo Majola
Sicelo Moyo
Terrence Bhengo
LEGIBLE
DATA SHOULD BE EASY TO READ AND UNDERSTAND
LEGIBLE DATA
๏ต Legible refers to the quality of being clear and easy to
read.
๏ต Data Legibility is crucial for ensuring that the information
can be understood and interpreted accurately.
๏ต Illegible documentation can lead to misinterpretation,
errors, and potential safety risks.
Guidelines to ensure legible
Documentation
1. Handwriting: If documentation is handwritten, use legible handwriting
techniques. Write clearly and neatly, using appropriate penmanship. Avoid
excessive pressure, which can result in smudged or blurred writing.
2. Font and Font Size: When using electronic or typed documentation, choose
a legible font and an appropriate font size such as Arial, Calibri, and Times
New Roman.
3. Formatting: Use formatting techniques to improve legibility. Use headings,
subheadings, bullet points, and numbered lists to break down information
into smaller, easily readable sections.
4. Consistency: Maintain consistency in formatting and style throughout the
documentation.
5. Spacing: Sufficient spacing improves readability and comprehension
WHAT WE ARE DOING RIGHT
๏ต We have an SOP in place that outlines GDP and requirements for legibility,
and this SOP is enforced. Eg procedure for correction of errors.
๏ต We are using electronic or typed documentation for consistency in
handwriting and easy input and retrieval of data.
๏ต We are using digital data extraction and recording mechanisms (BPCRS
System) to reduce errors and make the data more legible.
๏ต SOP 975.15 - The font size is large enough to be comfortably read,
especially for users with visual impairments.
๏ต Our SOPs, specifications and reports are properly formatted and
structured which helps readers navigate the documentation and find the
information they need quickly.
WHAT WE ARE DOING RIGHT
๏ต All our SOPs use the same font, font size, and formatting conventions
consistently (as per the SOP 975.15) to provide a uniform and cohesive
reading experience.
๏ต Sufficient spacing is used which improves readability and comprehension
๏ต Quality Control Checks โ€“ data is reviewed by the reviewers for legibility.
This also includes spot checking data records such as logbooks during
analysis work.
๏ต Digital archieving systems are in place to preserve the intergrity of
electronic data, eg external hard drives and saving data on shared.
๏ต Second person review of data generated during analysis to double-check
entries, using validated electronic calculation sheets.
THE GAPS
๏ต Lack of regular training for all personnel on proper data entry
techniques and handwritting techniques.
๏ต No regularly auditing of data management processes.
๏ต Lack of guidance on using electronic systems efficiently.
AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT
๏ต Conducting regular training for all personnel on proper data entry
techniques.
๏ต Provide guidance on using electronic systems efficiently.
๏ต Regularly auditing our data management processes to identify areas
for improvement.
๏ต Implement regular Q.C Checks to review data entries for legibility by
spot checking data records.
REFERENCES
๏ต SOP 975.15 Good Documentation Practices
๏ต SOP 700.12 Data Intergrity
๏ต Rao, Bayya & Reddy, B.. (2022). Understanding USFDA Guidance on
Data Integrity โ€“ ALCOA Plus-An Overview. Pharma Times. 54. 5-6.
๏ต Lemay, P., (2022). ALCOA Principles: A Guide to Data Integrity for Life Sciences
Manufacturers. ALCOA Principles: A Guide to Data Integrity for Life Sciencesโ€ฆ
| Tulip
THE END

Good documentation practices ALCOA+ LEGIBLE

  • 1.
    GROUP LEGIBLE Group Members BlessingNdlovu Nyaradzo Majola Sicelo Moyo Terrence Bhengo
  • 2.
    LEGIBLE DATA SHOULD BEEASY TO READ AND UNDERSTAND
  • 3.
    LEGIBLE DATA ๏ต Legiblerefers to the quality of being clear and easy to read. ๏ต Data Legibility is crucial for ensuring that the information can be understood and interpreted accurately. ๏ต Illegible documentation can lead to misinterpretation, errors, and potential safety risks.
  • 4.
    Guidelines to ensurelegible Documentation 1. Handwriting: If documentation is handwritten, use legible handwriting techniques. Write clearly and neatly, using appropriate penmanship. Avoid excessive pressure, which can result in smudged or blurred writing. 2. Font and Font Size: When using electronic or typed documentation, choose a legible font and an appropriate font size such as Arial, Calibri, and Times New Roman. 3. Formatting: Use formatting techniques to improve legibility. Use headings, subheadings, bullet points, and numbered lists to break down information into smaller, easily readable sections. 4. Consistency: Maintain consistency in formatting and style throughout the documentation. 5. Spacing: Sufficient spacing improves readability and comprehension
  • 5.
    WHAT WE AREDOING RIGHT ๏ต We have an SOP in place that outlines GDP and requirements for legibility, and this SOP is enforced. Eg procedure for correction of errors. ๏ต We are using electronic or typed documentation for consistency in handwriting and easy input and retrieval of data. ๏ต We are using digital data extraction and recording mechanisms (BPCRS System) to reduce errors and make the data more legible. ๏ต SOP 975.15 - The font size is large enough to be comfortably read, especially for users with visual impairments. ๏ต Our SOPs, specifications and reports are properly formatted and structured which helps readers navigate the documentation and find the information they need quickly.
  • 6.
    WHAT WE AREDOING RIGHT ๏ต All our SOPs use the same font, font size, and formatting conventions consistently (as per the SOP 975.15) to provide a uniform and cohesive reading experience. ๏ต Sufficient spacing is used which improves readability and comprehension ๏ต Quality Control Checks โ€“ data is reviewed by the reviewers for legibility. This also includes spot checking data records such as logbooks during analysis work. ๏ต Digital archieving systems are in place to preserve the intergrity of electronic data, eg external hard drives and saving data on shared. ๏ต Second person review of data generated during analysis to double-check entries, using validated electronic calculation sheets.
  • 7.
    THE GAPS ๏ต Lackof regular training for all personnel on proper data entry techniques and handwritting techniques. ๏ต No regularly auditing of data management processes. ๏ต Lack of guidance on using electronic systems efficiently.
  • 8.
    AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT ๏ตConducting regular training for all personnel on proper data entry techniques. ๏ต Provide guidance on using electronic systems efficiently. ๏ต Regularly auditing our data management processes to identify areas for improvement. ๏ต Implement regular Q.C Checks to review data entries for legibility by spot checking data records.
  • 9.
    REFERENCES ๏ต SOP 975.15Good Documentation Practices ๏ต SOP 700.12 Data Intergrity ๏ต Rao, Bayya & Reddy, B.. (2022). Understanding USFDA Guidance on Data Integrity โ€“ ALCOA Plus-An Overview. Pharma Times. 54. 5-6. ๏ต Lemay, P., (2022). ALCOA Principles: A Guide to Data Integrity for Life Sciences Manufacturers. ALCOA Principles: A Guide to Data Integrity for Life Sciencesโ€ฆ | Tulip
  • 10.