Global network survey

1
© 2014 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
11
Global Network Survey
BUILDING A COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE
Renee Pardello
assistant dean

2
OUTLINE
 Background
 Survey design
 Results
 Networks
 Next Steps

3
BACKGROUND
 USDA Center for International Programs
Develop a Community of Practice (CoP)
 Focuses on globalization, international
development challenges and intercultural skills
through shared ideas and stronger networks.
 Forum and a resource to integrate international
and global content into domestic Extension
programs and collaborate on projects that
support Extension efforts abroad.

4
WHY A CoP?
 Demographics
 Grand Challenges
 Leverage the
Connections

5
The number of foreign-born people in the United States is at an all-time high, at
40 million - an increase of about 9 million since the 2000 census. The 2010 census
put the total U.S. population at almost 309 million.

7
GRAND CHALLENGES

9
LEVERAGE THE CONNECTIONS
 Knowledge &
experience are
dispersed
 New expectations
 Need to work
differently
 Activating the national
extension system

10
PLANNING TEAM

12
 Type & focus of work
 Experience
 Professional Development
 Interest in CoP
 Network – snowball
SURVEY DESIGN

13
 N = 273
 94% of the participants are interested in CoP
Abroad and Domestic
 The additional 6% are only interested in
Domestic CoP
RESULTS

14
USA

15
ORGANIZATION TYPE
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
University Nonprofit Government For Profit 4-H Youth
Programs
CG,
International
Development
Non-profit Extension
Appointment
Percentofrespondents
Organization Types

16
I HAVE EXPERTISE TO TEACH….
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Teaching Categories

17
TRAINING VALUED
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
Training Topics

18
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
Kept aware of
activities
Attend online
training
Communicate
opportunities to
others
Attend in-person
training
Be on leadership
team
Provide in-person
training
Provide online
training
Contribute to
social media
Ways to participate
HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO PARTICIPATE?

19
COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE DOMESTIC
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
Slightly interested Moderately interested Strongly interested
Perecentofparticipants
Degree of interest

20
COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE ABROAD
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Slightly interested Moderately interested Strongly interested
Perecentofparticipants
Degree of interest

21
NETWORK MAP INTERPRETATION
 Size of nodes- number of connections
 Bridger of nodes - link between two
individuals or clusters
 Lines- shows connections
 Location- degree of centrality to complete
network

22

23
FOREIGN COUNTRIES
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
PercentageofRespondents
Countries in which respondents are involved

24
FOREIGN NETWORK- PEOPLE & COUNTRIES

25
FOREIGN NETWORK WITHOUT COUNTRIES

26
NETWORK OF PEOPLE INTERESTED IN CoP ABROAD

27
NETWORK OF PEOPLE INTERESTED IN CoP ABROAD– CORE COUNTRIES
Costa Rica
Mexico
Kenya
China

28
NETWORK OF PEOPLE INTERESTED IN CoP ABROAD – COSTA RICA
Costa Rica

29
COSTA RICA NETWORK- PEOPLE ONLY
Costa Rica

30
COSTA RICA NETWORK - PEOPLE & PLACES THEY ARE CONNECTED
Mexico
Nicaragua
Costa Rica

31
NETWORK OF PEOPLE INTERESTED IN CoP ABROAD - MEXICO
Mexico

32
MEXICO NETWORK- PEOPLE ONLY

33
MEXICO NETWORK
Mexico

34
MEXICO NETWORK– PEOPLE & PLACES THEY ARE CONNECTED
Mexico
Ecuador
Dominican
Republic
Costa Rica
Guatemala
Nicaragua
Thailand
Honduras
Cambodia
India

35
NETWORK OF PEOPLE INTERESTED IN CoP ABROAD - KENYA
Kenya

36
KENYA NETWORK
Kenya

37
KENYA NETWORK - PEOPLE & PLACES THEY ARE CONNECTED
Kenya
Mexico
China
Tanzania
Ghana

38
NETWORK OF PEOPLE INTERESTED IN CoP ABROAD - CHINA
China

39
CHINA NETWORK
China

40
CHINA NETWORK- PEOPLE & PLACES THEY ARE CONNECTED
China Tanzania
Kenya
India
Burkina Faso
Ghana

41
RECENT IMMIGRANT
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
PercentofRespondents
Country of Origin

42
IMMIGRANT NETWORK WITH COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN
Mexico

43
IMMIGRANT NETWORK

44
MEXICO RECENT IMMIGRANT NETWORK
Mexico

45
STRUCTURE OF PEOPLE WHO WORK
WITH MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS

46
SUBJECT AREAS
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Percentofparticipants
Subject Areas

47
SUBJECT AREA NETWORK
Agriculture, Post Harvest
Youth Dev.
Family Dev.
Water
Climate
Forestry
Gender Studies
Food Consumer Sci.
Aquaculture
Child Welfare
Health & Nutrition
Agriculture - Other
Community Dev.
Economic Dev.
Natural Resources
Agriculture, Plants
Agriculture, Animals

48
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Dev.

49
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ITS RELATIONSHIP
WITH OTHER SUBJECTS AREA NETWORKS
Agriculture - Other
Economic Dev.
Community Dev.
Youth Development

50
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK

51
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK & COUNTRIES
Mexico
Thailand
Costa RicaNicaragua

52
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK AND COSTA RICA
Costa Rica

53
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK AND
COSTA RICA
Costa Rica

54
Costa Rica - People Only
Costa Rica – Comm. Devp.

55
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK AND MEXICO
Mexico

56
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK AND MEXICO
Mexico

57
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Economic Dev.

58
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ITS RELATIONS
Economic Dev.
Community Dev.

59
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NETWORK

60
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NETWORK AND COUNTRIES

61
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INDIA
India

62
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NETWORK AND INDIA
India

63
YOUTH DEVELOPMENT
Youth Dev.

64
YOUTH DEVELOPMENT AND ITS RELATIONS
Youth Dev.
Community Dev.
Famaily Dev.

65
YOUTH DEVELOPMENT NETWORK

66
YOUTH DEVELOPMENT NETWORK COUNTRIES
Mexico

67
YOUTH DEVELOPMENT NETWORK AND MEXICO
Mexico

68
AGRICULTURE NETWORK
Agriculture - Other
Agriculture, Plants

69
AGRICULTURE PARTS
Agriculture - Other
Agriculture, Plants

70
AGRICULTURE AND RELATIONS WITH OTHER SUBJECTS
Agriculture - Other
Agriculture, Plants

71
AGRICULTURE: COUNTRIES AND SUBJECT
Agriculture - Other
Agriculture, Plants

72
AGRICULTURE: SUBJECTS AND PEOPLE
Agriculture - Other
Agriculture, Plants

73
AGRICULTURE: PERSON TO PERSON NETWORK

74
WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN?
 Lots of interest to be involved
 More data to analyze
 Lack of knowledge of our work
 Huge opportunities to make a difference
 More strategic to address grand
challenges
 Other??

75
NEXT STEPS
Mar-June, 2014
Network survey
design, test, launch,
& analysis
Aug-Oct, 2014
Draft & review
CoP plan, access
current networks
for feedback
Feb-May, 2105
Implement funding
strategy & continue
soft launch
June-July, 2014
Network analysis
& interview
potential CoP
leaders
Nov-Feb, 2014/15
Design the CoP
& soft CoP launch
June-Sept, 2015
Assess, revise,
& next steps

76
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities
Act, this PowerPoint is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to 612-624-1222.
Renee Pardello
gnetwork@umn.edu

Global network survey

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Global network survey

Similar to Global network survey (20)

More from pard0017

More from pard0017 (6)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Global network survey

Editor's Notes