1. The document discusses global poverty statistics, highlighting that at least 80% of humanity lives on less than $10 per day and the poorest 40% accounts for only 5% of global income.
2. Key facts provided include that 22,000 children die daily due to poverty, 72 million primary-aged children are not in school, and over 1 billion people cannot read or write.
3. Infectious diseases greatly impact the poor, with millions of cases of malaria, HIV/AIDS, and lack of access to water, shelter, and healthcare.
Informe kissinger en_es_traducido_online - PIDE ABORTO - Reducción Población
En la web aun se puede encontrar la versión original en INGLES esta es una que mediante un programa online tradujo Pablo Martin Lazare
PARA AQUELLOS QUE NO ESTAN CONFORMES O SEGUROS DE LA VERSION EN CASTELLANO QUE SUBI AQUI MISMO EN SLIDESHARE COMPARTO LA ORIGINAL EN INGLES para que corroboren y comparen.
Informe kissinger en_es_traducido_online - PIDE ABORTO - Reducción Población
En la web aun se puede encontrar la versión original en INGLES esta es una que mediante un programa online tradujo Pablo Martin Lazare
PARA AQUELLOS QUE NO ESTAN CONFORMES O SEGUROS DE LA VERSION EN CASTELLANO QUE SUBI AQUI MISMO EN SLIDESHARE COMPARTO LA ORIGINAL EN INGLES para que corroboren y comparen.
Forecasting prices even one year ahead can be a hazardous business. That applies especially to markets so dominated by that most unpredictable element of weather and, increasingly these days; the sometimes even more capricious influence of global economic trends – trade and GDP growth, currency volatility, the price of crude oil, etc.
NIC voorspelde gewijzigde machtsverhoudingen na pandemieThierry Debels
Het rapport 'Mapping the Global Future' van het NIC voorspelde in 2004 gewijzigde machtsverhoudingen na een pandemie. Dat scenario speelt zich vandaag af.
THE MILITARY POWER OF GREAT POWERS AND THE LOSS OF UTILITY OF THE ARMED FORCE...Fernando Alcoforado
This article aims to demonstrate that the great powers have acquired such military power that it has rendered the armed forces of the vast majority of countries in the world useless. The deterrent military power against external threats from the vast majority of countries in the world has become irrelevant in the contemporary era with the use by the great powers of an immense arsenal of nuclear weapons and modern cyber war. The view that each country must have its armed forces to defend its territories to deter external threats has become irrelevant because the vast majority of countries in the world have armed forces based on obsolete structures from the past. This fact makes military spending in almost all countries of the world unproductive, making it unnecessary the existence of armed forces whose military spending should be used in economic sectors most relevant to the economic and social development of many countries.
The global high yield bond markets have witnessed sentiment to risk-off mode. This has since been partially significant growth and diversification over the last few years aided by the extraordinary monetary policy accommodation provided by central banks across the world. The unprecedented liquidity made available at record low yields has thus led to a significant pick up in both primary market and secondary market activity in the asset class. Banking disintermediation in Europe and regulatory changes in the financial sector further contributed to the deepening and diversification of the high yield bond markets even as emerging market issuances entered the fray.
In this backdrop, Aranca’s special report – High Yield Bonds - The Rise of the Fallen – examines how liquidity concerns have increased with changing regulatory environment, rising capital requirements and declining risk appetite leading to decreasing bond inventories at both banks and other dealers even as corporate bond issuances are at an all-time high.
As u see from our increasing economy .Who will be the next superpower among all countries ??
want some help in your ppt or in any project visit..
https://www.fiverr.com/dawachya
Forecasting prices even one year ahead can be a hazardous business. That applies especially to markets so dominated by that most unpredictable element of weather and, increasingly these days; the sometimes even more capricious influence of global economic trends – trade and GDP growth, currency volatility, the price of crude oil, etc.
NIC voorspelde gewijzigde machtsverhoudingen na pandemieThierry Debels
Het rapport 'Mapping the Global Future' van het NIC voorspelde in 2004 gewijzigde machtsverhoudingen na een pandemie. Dat scenario speelt zich vandaag af.
THE MILITARY POWER OF GREAT POWERS AND THE LOSS OF UTILITY OF THE ARMED FORCE...Fernando Alcoforado
This article aims to demonstrate that the great powers have acquired such military power that it has rendered the armed forces of the vast majority of countries in the world useless. The deterrent military power against external threats from the vast majority of countries in the world has become irrelevant in the contemporary era with the use by the great powers of an immense arsenal of nuclear weapons and modern cyber war. The view that each country must have its armed forces to defend its territories to deter external threats has become irrelevant because the vast majority of countries in the world have armed forces based on obsolete structures from the past. This fact makes military spending in almost all countries of the world unproductive, making it unnecessary the existence of armed forces whose military spending should be used in economic sectors most relevant to the economic and social development of many countries.
The global high yield bond markets have witnessed sentiment to risk-off mode. This has since been partially significant growth and diversification over the last few years aided by the extraordinary monetary policy accommodation provided by central banks across the world. The unprecedented liquidity made available at record low yields has thus led to a significant pick up in both primary market and secondary market activity in the asset class. Banking disintermediation in Europe and regulatory changes in the financial sector further contributed to the deepening and diversification of the high yield bond markets even as emerging market issuances entered the fray.
In this backdrop, Aranca’s special report – High Yield Bonds - The Rise of the Fallen – examines how liquidity concerns have increased with changing regulatory environment, rising capital requirements and declining risk appetite leading to decreasing bond inventories at both banks and other dealers even as corporate bond issuances are at an all-time high.
As u see from our increasing economy .Who will be the next superpower among all countries ??
want some help in your ppt or in any project visit..
https://www.fiverr.com/dawachya
The United States Stock Market is virtually at the same position tod.pdfamitsinghal181
The United States Senate contains two senators form each of the 50 states. (a) If a committee of
eight senators is selected at random, what is the probability that it will contain at least one of the
two senators from a certain specified state? (b) What is the probability that a group of 50
senators selected at random will contain one senator from each state?
Solution
a) p = 2 C1 * 98 C 7 / 100 C 8 b) p = 2^50/ 100 C 50 =.
The future path of US interest rate policy remains a major source of uncertainty for global markets, with the rates market far more dovish than analysts and in particular FOMC members. Someone will ultimately be proven wrong and this will impact asset prices, including the US dollar.
there will be 2 articles attached may you please summarize the artic.docxbarbaran11
there will be 2 articles attached may you please summarize the articles attached seperatley and add a bibllography and opinion to each (must be at least 2 pgs double spaced)
Japan’s Swinging Bonds — A Future Economic Crisis
ARTICLE
COMMENTS (1)
BONDS
JAPAN
smaller
Larger
facebook
twitter
google plus
linked in
Email
Print
By Vincent Cignarella
The inability of Japanese government debt to stop gyrating wildly poses a significant threat to the country’s climb out of its two-decade economic mire.
In the past six months, Japanese 10-year bond yields have swung like a pendulum. The huge swings were never more prescient than Thursday, when the yield jumped over 1.0% for the first time in over a year.
That volatility poses a significant threat to Japan, specifically through the balance sheets of its banks. In a statement clearly acknowledging those risks, Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda said Friday that it is “extremely desirable” for the nation’s debt market to be stable.
When it comes to government debt, Japan’s biggest banks are all in. Consolidated financial statements of
Mizuho Financial Group
8411.TO
0.00%
and Mitsubishi Financial Group show they each hold 23% of total assets in Japanese national government and a variety of government agency bonds.
As that debt vacillates in price so do the banks’ Tier 1 capital asset ratios and presumably their ability to lend and create loans. Japanese banks would face 6.6 trillion yen in losses should interest rates rise broadly by one percentage point, according to the Bank of Japan.
One week into 2013, 10-year government bonds climbed in yield to nearly 0.85% from early December lows of 0.69%. They then fell dramatically to 0.44% in early April only to climb again violently to the 12-month high on Thursday. All that interest rate volatility and so far, no inflation in sight.
Recent gross domestic product figures from Japan showed growth of 3.5% on an annual basis but the GDP deflator, a measure of inflation printed at a decline of 1.2% from a year earlier. That is 14 consecutive negative quarters.
If these government bond yields continue to gyrate beyond the central bank’s control and no inflation comes, the government stands to lose credibility domestically.
That credibility is already somewhat in question given during his first term as prime minister, Shinzo Abe lacked the political power to follow central bank action with his own government reform. Without that reform, Abe’s goal of 2% inflation within two years is in grave peril.
If he has any doubts about the need for government action, look no further than U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditures, the Federal Reserve’s favorite indicator for inflation, was 2.5% in 2008 before the global financial crisis took hold. Now almost five years later and massive quantitative easing from the Fed, the PCE is just 1.1% because there has been no help from fiscal policy.
The importance of credibility is even greater in Japan, where local investors finan.
This is the presentation that was delivered to wealth managers and financial advisors in August 2009 at the launch of the SA Bullion IFA Platform.
The presentation is in 3 Parts:
1. The Case for Gold in the 21st Century
2. How to Include Bullion in an Investment Portfolio
3. Presenting The BullionGold Facility
All interest to be directed to business@sabullion.co.za
www.sabullion.co.za
We live in an interconnected world and geopolitical developments in Ukraine and Syria are bound to add volatility in global geopolitical environment and influence small and large economies around the world.
Further, the economic environment is undergoing an unusual shift, through unorthodox and new policy making in Japan, US and Europe.
In such a situation small sized GCC economies, which are also dependent heavily on commodity prices and transit of goods, should exercise caution, and not get swayed by the rosy pictures stock markets around the world are painting.
1. Exchange Rates: The strength of the U.S.
in the 1990s relative to Euro, Yen and other
currencies led to a large a growing current
account deficit in the US. After 2000, the US
current account deficit worsened further as the
fiscal deficits mushroomed ( twin deficits ) and
as the private savings rate sank to zero. Is this
current account deficit sustainable or is going to
lead to a crash in the value of the US dollar
and/or a spike in US interest rates (hard
landing)? The dollar peaked and started to
decline in 2002-2004, especially relative to the
Euro, but then it sharply appreciated again in
2005 as interest rates and real growth
differentials favored the dollar relative to the
euro and the yen. But the dollar resumed its fall
in 2006 when signals of a US slowdown and a
Fed pause increased. Will the U.S. dollar
continnue its fall? Will the adjustment of global
current account imbalances be orderly or
disorderly? How will the Euro perform during the
rest of 2005 and in 2006? Will the yen weaken
or strengthen? Will China further revalue its
currency? Will other Asian economies keep on
aggressively intervening in the forex market to
prevent the appreciation of their currencies
relative to the US dollar? Are we going to
2. experience other currency crisis in some
emerging markets as the market turmoil in May-
June 2006 seemed to intimate?
Energy: The spike in the price of oil since 2004
has led to concerns about stagflation (recession
plus inflation) as oil prices have been hovering
around $70 a barrel or above for several months
now. Earlier in the decade, the 2000 oil price
shock negatively affected oil importing countries
and contributed to the 2001 recession. Oil prices
went up again in late 2002 and the first quarter
of 2003 because of expectations of a war with
Iraq and supply shocks in Venezuela and
Nigeria. But even after the war was oil prices
remained high and they spiked sharply in 2004
and 2005 because of high demand (especially
from China and the U.S.), low global spare
production and refining capacity, concerns that
terrorism (Iraq, Saudi Arabia) will lead to supply
shortages ( fear premium ) and continued supply
concerns about Russia, Venezuela and Nigeria.
Will recent oil spike lead to a U.S. and global
slowdown in 2007? Why didn t the 2004-2005 oil
shock lead to a slowdown? What is the risk that
the currently high oil prices and further oil price
spikes will lead to a sharp U.S. and global
3. economic slowdown?
Emerging Market Economies: 2001 was a
dismal year for emerging market (EM)
economies. The slowdown of growth in US and
G7, the tech bust and the reduction of flows of
capital to emerging markets led to a sharp
slowdown of growth in many emerging markets.
Outright currency and financial crises emerged
in Turkey (February 2001) and Argentina
(December 2001). In 2002, severe pressures
mounted in Uruguay and Brazil; Uruguay
experienced a severe financial crisis in mid
2002; Brazil barely escaped a financial crisis as
elections loomed in October 2002 but then it
recovered after Lula followed moderate policies.
2003 was also a poor year for emerging markets
(especially Latin America) as the global
economy did not recover fast enough. Emerging
market economies growth recovered sharply in
2004, especially in Asia but also in Latin
America. 2004-2006 were excellent years for
EMs as global growth was high, global interest
rates were low and commodity prices were high.
But as short rates are going up (in the G7) and
the global economy may be slowing down, oil
prices and commodity prices may fall; thus,
economic and financial conditions may get
4. rougher for some emerging markets. The turmoil
in emerging markets in May-June 2006 is a
signal that rougher times are ahead. Which
emerging market economies are vulnerable to
financial stress in 2006-2007?
Economy: The main risk is that three bearish
shocks a housing bust, high oil prices, and the
delayed effects of the Fed Funds rate increases
- will lead to a sharp U.S. slowdown as the U.S.
economy is already imbalanced with low private
savings, large budget deficits, large current
account deficits, a real estate bubble that is now
bursting and a shopped-out consumer. These
shocks are hitting a US consumer facing falling
real wages, negative savings, high debt ratios,
increasing debt servicing ratios, a softening
labor market; no wonder consumer confidence is
sharply down? In 2001, the U.S. economy
experienced a recession; there was a sharp
slowdown of growth in other developed and
developing countries, with recession in several
of them. Twin (fiscal and current account)
deficits emerged and got worse until 2005. The
U.S. recovery in 2002 was weak (growth of
output but not of jobs). In 2003 the economy
picked up after the Iraq war uncertainty was
cleared, but it remained a jobless recovery . In
5. 2004, job growth started to be positive (but still
sub-standard); the economy hit a growth soft
patch in Q2 of 2004, then recovered for the rest
of the year. In 2005, the economy followed a yo-
yo pattern: high growth in Q1, concerns about a
new soft patch in part of Q2, renewed optimism
about a goldilocks economy (with low inflation
and good growth) in the early summer and
renewed concerns about an economic slowdown
in the late summer because of the further spike
in oil prices. The growth rate took a hit in Q4 in
the aftermath of the Katrina hurricane. Growth
recovered to above 5% in Q1 of 2006 but it
slowed down sharply in Q2 to 2.9%. How
rapidly will the U.S and global economy grow in
the second half of 2006 and 2007? Will the US
experience a soft landing or a hard landing?
What will be the macro effects of the bust in the
housing sector? Will the rest of the world
decouple from a US slowdown? What are the
risks of a major US and global slowdown? Will
the Fed maintain its pause? Will the next Fed
move be a hike given inflation concerns or a
cut rates given growth slowdown?
Poverty Facts and Statistics
Almost half the world — over three billion
people — live on less than $2.50 a day
6. 1:At least 80% of humanity lives on less than
$10 a day.
2:More than 80 percent of the world’s population
lives in countries where income differentials are
widening.
3: The poorest 40 percent of the world’s
population accounts for 5 percent of global
income. The richest 20 percent accounts for
three-quarters of world income.
4:According to UNICEF, 22,000 children die
each day due to poverty. And they “die quietly in
some of the poorest villages on earth, far
removed from the scrutiny and the conscience of
the world. Being meek and weak in life makes
these dying
multitudes even more invisible in death.
5:Based on enrollment data, about 72 million
children of primary school age in the developing
world were not in school in 2005; 57 per cent of
them were girls. And these are regarded as
optimistic numbers.
6:Nearly a billion people entered the 21st
century unable to read a book or sign their
names.
7. 7:Less than one per cent of what the world
spent every year on weapons was needed to put
every child into school by the year 2000 and yet
it didn’t happen.
8:Infectious diseases continue to blight the lives
of the poor across the world. An estimated 40
million people are living with HIV/AIDS, with 3
million deaths in 2004. Every year there are
350–500 million cases of malaria, with 1 million
fatalities: Africa accounts for 90 percent of
malarial deaths and African children account for
over 80 percent of malaria victims worldwide.
9:Shelter, safe water and health
For the 1.9 billion children from the developing
world, there are:
640 million without adequate shelter (1 in 3)
400 million with no access to safe water (1 in 5)
270 million with no access to health services (1
in 7)
10:Rural areas account for three in every four
people living on less than US$1 a day and a
similar share of the world population suffering
from malnutrition. However, urbanization is not
synonymous with human progress. Urban slum
growth is outpacing urban growth by a wide
margin.
8. Arms Trade—a major cause of suffering
The arms trade is a major cause of human rights
abuses. Some governments spend more on
military expenditure than on social development,
communications infrastructure and health
combined. While every nation has the right and
the need to ensure its security, in these
changing times, arms requirements and
procurements may need to change too.
Each year, around $45-60 billion worth of arms
sales are agreed. Most of these sales
(something like 75%) are to developing
countries.
The 5 permanent members of the UN Security
Council (US, Russia, France, United Kingdom
and China), together with Germany and Italy
account for around 85% of the arms sold
between 2004 and 2011.
World Military Spending
World military spending had reduced since the
Cold War ended, but a few nations such as the
US retain high level spending.
In recent years, global military expenditure has
increased again and is now comparable to Cold
War levels again. Recent data shows global
9. spending at over $1.6 trillion.
The highest military spender is the US
accounting for just over two-fifths of the world’s
spending, more than the rest of the G7 (most
economically advanced countries) combined,
and more than all its potential enemies,
combined.