This document summarizes the winners and losers of globalization according to a student project. It argues that farmers and factory workers are the losers, as they work hard to produce raw materials and products but are paid very little, around 40p for their work. In contrast, retailers are identified as the winners, as they are paid the most for their work while doing very little. However, the document also notes that globalization creates an interconnected chain and that all parts are reliant on each other to function. It provides examples of brand headquarters and manufacturing locations to support its analysis of the globalization process.

1. Winners and Losers globalisation project By FE and LP 9G (FEHS 2005-06)

3. Argument with Examples and Evidence If we had to chose a winner and a loser, this would be who they are. The winners are the retailers because they get paid the most and hardly do any work to get that money. The losers would be the the farmers because they have to produce the raw materials to make the products and only get paid approximately 40p. But we think there are two sides two this because globalisation is a chain. For instants if the farmer don’t produce the raw material the factory workers wouldn’t be able to make the products. And if the factory workers don’t produce the products then the retailers wouldn’t have anything to sell. So the then they wouldn’t get so the factory workers wouldn’t and then the farmers wouldn’t.

4. World map of were the brands HQ’s are and the “made in” country Brand: Adidas HQ: Germany Made: Indonesia Brand: FCUK HQ: UK Made: UK Brand: Gap HQ:USA Made:Guatemala

6. The Process of Globalisation Retailer The retailer sell the products made by the factory workers to the consumers and work in the shop and gets paid a lot of money for just selling the product. Consumers The consumer buy things from the retailers. That is how the Globalisation chain works

9. The End