SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 32
Download to read offline
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337447447
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits, Workshop on Diffeology etc,25
June 2014, Aix en Province,Marseille, France
Presentation · June 2014
CITATIONS
0
READS
8
1 author:
Hassan Jolany
66 PUBLICATIONS 331 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Hassan Jolany on 15 January 2024.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Workshop on Diffeology etc
Aix en Provence, France- June 25-26-27, 2014
Geometric Quantization On Coadjoint Orbits
Hassan Jolany, University of Lille1
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
List of sections
1 Coadjoint Orbits
2 Geometric Quantization
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Coadjoint Orbits
Let G be a compact semisimple Lie group with Lie algebra g.
Group G acts on dual of Lie algebra g∗ with coadjoint
representation Ad∗
: G × g∗ → g∗ by convention:
Ad∗
g µ, X = µ, Adg−1 X
where µ ∈ g∗, g ∈ G, X ∈ g.
Definition
The subset Oµ = {Ad∗
g µ; g ∈ G} of g∗ is called a coadjoint orbit
of G through µ ∈ g∗
Coadjoint orbit through µ ∈ g∗ can be written Oµ
∼
= G/Gµ,
which the stabilizer subgroup Gµ can be written as
Gµ = {g ∈ G : Ad∗
g µ = µ}
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Some Examples of Co-Adjoint Orbits
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Some Examples of Co-Adjoint Orbits
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Complexified of Lie Group
Definition
If G is a Lie group, a universal complexification is given by a
complex Lie group GC and a continuous homomorphism
ϕ : G → GC with the universal property that, if f : G → H is an
arbitrary continuous homomorphism into a complex Lie group H,
then there is a unique complex analytic homomorphism
F : GC → H such that f = Foϕ.
For a classical Real Lie group G, The complexification of Lie
group GC can be defined as
GC
:= exp{g + ig}
Let G = U(n), then GC = GL(n, C) or Let K = SU(n), then
KC = SL(n, C)
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Complexified of Lie Group
Theorem
Let G be a compact and connected Lie group, then
GC ∼
= G n g∗ ∼
= T∗
G
which this decomposition known as Polar Decomposition.
Every coadjoint orbit Oµ can be written as
Oµ
∼
= GC
/P ∼
= T∗
G/P
which P is the Parabolic subgroup.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Volume of a coadjoint orbits
Kirillov’s Character formula:
Kirillov’s famous formula says that the characters of the irreducible
unitary representations of a compact Lie group G can be written
by following form
χλ(exp(x)) =
1
p(x)
Z
Oλ+ρ
e2πi<µ,x>
dµOλ+ρ
(µ)
where p is a certain function on lie algebra g and it can be written
as
p(x) = det1/2 sinh(ad(x/2))
ad(x/2)
and µ is the highest weight
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Volume of a coadjoint orbit
Theorem
The Volume of a Coadjoint Orbit through µ is
Vol(Oµ) =
Y
α∈R+
< α, µ >
< α, ρ >
where ρ = 1
2
P
α∈R+ α
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Measure on coadjoint orbits
Explicit formula for measure of coadjoint orbits:
For µ ∈ g∗, we define a skew-symmetric bilinear form bµ on
TeGµ Oµ
∼
= g/gµ by
bµ(ū, v̄) =< µ, [u, v] >
where for u, v ∈ g, we write ū, v̄ ∈ g/gµ.
So, the dual form of bµ is the bilinear form βµ on
(g/gµ)∗ = g⊥
µ = g.µ corresponding to bµ under this isomorphism
βµ(u.µ, v.µ) = bµ(ū, v̄)
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Measure on coadjoint orbits
Now choose a basis v̄1, v̄2, ..., v̄m for g/gµ and µ1, µ2, ..., µm be the
dual basis for (g/gµ)∗ (where m is the maximal dimension of an
orbit in g∗)then
1
(m/2)!
bm/2
µ = Pf < µ, [vi , vj ] > µ1 ∧ ... ∧ µm
and
1
(m/2)!
βm/2
µ = Pf−1
< µ, [vi , vj ] > v̄1 ∧ ... ∧ v̄m
where Pf(aij ) denotes the Pfaffian of a skew-symmetric matrix (aij )
Now define,
ωµ =
1
(m/2)!
βm/2
µ
So integration of ωµ gives measure on Oµ up to the factor (2π)m/2
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Geometric properties of coadjoint orbits
Every coadjoint orbit is symplectic manifold. The symplectic
form on Oλ is given by
ωλ(ad∗
X, ad∗
Y ) = hλ, [X, Y ]i
. This is obviously anti-symmetric and non-degenerate and
also closed 2-form.
Every coadjoint orbit has Kaehler and Hyper-Kaehler
structure.
Coadjont orbits are simply connected.
Theorem
Let G be a Lie group, and Φ : T∗G → g∗ be a moment map and
ζ ∈ g∗ then the symplectic quotient Φ−1(ζ)
Gζ
is coadjoint orbit
through ζ, i.e., Oζ.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Here, by previous theorem we see that the symplectic form on
cotangent bunlde of a Lie group is related to Kostant Kirillov
Souriau symplectic structure of the coadjoint orbits in the
dual of a Lie algebra as follows
G
i //
π

T∗G
Oζ
and we have
π∗
ωOζ
= i∗
ωT∗G
Theorem of Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour:
Theorem
Every connected Hausdorff symplectic manifold is isomorphic to a
coadjoint orbit of its group of hamiltonian diffeomorphisms.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Geometric PDE on coadjoint orbits
Following theorem known as M. Stenzel’s theorem: We denote the
complexified of a coadjoint orbit as
OC
ζ := GC
/GC
ζ
where ζ ∈ g∗
Theorem
Let G be a compact, connected and semisimple, Lie group. There
exists a G invariant, real analytic, strictly plurisubharmonic
function of complexified coadjoint orbit ρ : OC
ζ → [0, ∞) such that
u =
√
ρ satisfies the Monge-Ampere equation,
(∂ ¯
∂u)n
= 0
where n = dim Oλ
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Geometric Quantization
Now, we define the geometric quantization by some axioms which
are compatible with physical view.
Geometric quantization we associate to a symplectic manifold
(M, ω) a Hilbert space H, and one associates to smooth
functions f : M → R skew-adjoint operators Of : H → H.
Paul Dirac introduced in his doctoral thesis, the ”method of
classical analogy”for quantization which is now known as
Dirac axioms as follows.
1] Poisson bracket of functions passes to commutator of operators:
O{f ,g} = [Of , Og ]
2] Linearity condition must holds ,Oλ1f +λ2g = λ1Of + λ2Og for
λ1, λ2 ∈ C
3] Normalization condition must holds: 1 7→ i.I(Which I is identity
√
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Dirac Principal for Geometric quantization
Before to establish the axiom 4], we need to following definition.
Definition
Let (M, ω), be a symplectic manifold. A set of smooth functions
{fj } is said to be a complete set of classical observables if and only
if every other function g such that {fi , g} = 0 for all {fj }, is
constant. Also we say that a family of operators is complete if it
acts irreducibly on H
4] Minimality condition must holds: Any complete family of
functions passes to a complete family of operators. Moreover, if G
be a group acting on (M, ω) by symplectomorphisms and on H by
unitary transformations. If the G-action on M is trnsitive, then its
action on H must be irreducible.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Geometric Quantization
Now, we again recall the pre-quantization Line bundle in
formal language. In fact, we have two important method for
Geometric Quantization;
1)Using line bundle. More precisely, In geometric quantization
we construct the Hilbert space H as a subspace of the space
of sections of a line bundle L on a symplectic manifold M.
2)Without using line bundle: Using Mpc-structure instead of
line bundle. One of advantage of this construction is better
behaved of physical view but definig it is not so easy.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
Quantization
The use of Mpc structures clarifies and extends the traditional
Konstant scheme of geometric in a number of ways.
In fact, prequantized Mpc structures generalize the combined
traditional data consisting of a prequantum line bundle and a
metaplectic structure and are used in constructing and
comparing representations of poisson algebras on symplectic
manifolds.
Also, Mpc structures exists on any symplectic manifold.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Group
Definition
Let (V , Ω) be a real symplectic vector space and fix an irreducible
unitary projective representation W of V on a Hilbert space H
such that
x, y ∈ V ⇒ W (x)W (y) = exp{
1
2i~
Ω(x, y)}W (x + y)
. If g ∈ Sp(V , Ω), so that g is a linear automorphism of V with
g∗Ω = Ω. So, by uniqueness theorem of Stone and von Neumann
there exists a unitary operator U on H such that
v ∈ V ⇒ W (gv) = UW (v)U−1. The group of all such operators
U as g ranges over the symplectic group Sp(V , Ω) is denoted by
Mpc(V , Ω)
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Group
We have a central short exact sequence
1 → U(1) → Mpc
(V , Ω)
σ
→ Sp(V , Ω) → 1
where σ sends U to g.
Mpc(V , Ω) supports a unique unitary character
η : Mpc(V , Ω) → U(1) such that η(λ) = λ2 whenever
λ ∈ U(1).
The kernel of η is a connected double cover of Sp(V , Ω)
called metaplectic group Mp(V , ω)
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Structure
Definition
Let (E, ω) be a real symplectic vector bundle over the manifold M.
If the rank of E equals the dimension of V then we may model
(E, ω) on (V , Ω) and define the symplectic frame bundle
Sp(E, ω) = Sp(E) to be the principal Sp(V , Ω) bundle over M
whose fibre over m ∈ M consists of all linear isomorphisms
b : V → Em such that b∗ωm = Ω
Now, we are ready to define Mpc-structure.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Structure
Definition
By an Mpc-structure on (E, ω) we mean a principal Mpc(V , Ω)
bundle π : P → M with a fibre-preserving map φ : P → Sp(E, ω)
such that the group actions are compatible:
φ(p.g) = φ(p).σ(g), ∀p ∈ P, g ∈ Mpc
(V , Ω)
where σ : Mpc(V ) → Sp(V )
Mpc-structures for (E, ω) are parametrized by H2(M, Z).
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Quantization
Definition
Let (M, ω) be a symplectic manifold. A prequantized Mpc
structure for (M, ω) is a pair (P, γ) with P an Mpc structure for
(TM, ω) and γ an Mpc-invariant u(1)-valued one-form on P such
that: if z ∈ mpc(V , Ω) = Lie(Mpc(V , Ω)) determines the
fundamental vector field z̄ on P then
γ(z̄) =
1
2
η∗z
and
dγ = (1/i~)π∗
ω
where π : P → M is the bundle projection. We say that (M, ω) is
quantizable iff it admits prequantized Mpc structures.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Quantization
Theorem
(M, ω) is quantizable if and only if
[ω] −
1
2
c1(TM)
be an integral cohomology class.
Theorem
Inequivalent prequantized Mpc structures are parametrized by
H1
(M; U(1))
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Quantization on cotangent bundle of Lie groups,
T∗
G
Let G be a Lie group with Lie algebra g . Take, Z = T∗G . Modle
T∗G on the symplectic vector space V = g ⊕ g∗ with symplectic
form
Ω((ξ, φ), (η, ψ)) = φ(η) − ψ(ξ)
The standard left action of G on the cotangent bundle T∗G is
Hamiltonian , with equivariant moment map
J : T∗
G → g∗
with
J(αg ) = g.α
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Quantization on cotangent bundle of Lie groups,
T∗
G
A canonical global section b : T∗G → Sp(T∗G) of the symplectic
frame bundle Sp(T∗G) is defined by
bαg (ξ, φ) = Λ∗

√
2(g−1
.ξ)g ,
1
√
2
(g−1
.φ − (g−1
.ξ).α)α

where Λ : G × g∗ → T∗G sends (g, α) to αg an where dots signify
adjoint and coadjoint action.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Quantization on cotangent bundle of Lie groups,
T∗
G
The Mpc structure is the product π : T∗G × Mpc(V ) → T∗G
with projection T∗G × Mpc(V ) → Sp(T∗G) determined by
sending (z, I) to bz; the prequantum form δ is given by
δ =
1
i~
π∗
θ +
1
2
η∗
where θ is the canonical one-form on T∗G and  is the flat
connection in π : T∗G × Mpc(V ) → T∗G and η is the unitary
character of Mpc(V ) restricting to U(1) as the squaring map.
The passage of prequantized Mpc structures to Marsden Weinstein
redced phase spaces here gives to us prequantized Mpc structures
on coadjoint orbits.(because Marsden Weinstein redced phase
spaces of T∗G is the coadjoint orbit Oλ )
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Mpc
- Quantization on coadjoint orbits
For φ ∈ g∗ we denote Oφ = G.φ ⊂ g∗ its coadjoint orbit we can
identify Oφ
∼
= G/Gφ, which Gφ is coadjoint stabilizer with Lie
algebra gφ, and also we denote the identity component of Gφ with
G0
φ .
Now we explain Robinson and J. H. Rawnsley’s quantization: We
know that the vanishing holonomy generalizes the Keller Maslov
corrected Bohr sommerfeld rule. So we give the following theorem
for quantization on coadjoint orbits
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Theorem
Mpc- Quantization on coadjoint orbits: For the coadjoint orbit
Oφ
∼
= G/Gφ, the vanishing holonomy condition amounts to the
following requirement:
That the adjoint isotropy representation Ad : G0
φ → Sp(g/h), given
by Adh(ξ + gφ) = h.ξ + gφ for h ∈ G0
φ and ξ ∈ g should lift to a
homomorphism τ : G0
φ → Mpc(g/h) with the property that
(ηoτ)∗ = − 2
i~φ
Now here we give a connection between two different quantizations
on coadjoint orbits with line bundles and without line bundle,
Theorem
Hassan Jolany’s Theorem: Let the coadjoint orbit Oµ with
pre-quantum line bundle (G ×Gµ C)⊗2 be quantizable then the
coadjoint orbit Oµ is Mpc quantizable.
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Theorem
Hassan Jolany’s theorem: A coadjoint orbit (Oφ, ωKKS ) is
Mpc-quantizable if and only if
[ω] −
1
4
X
α∈R+
α
belongs to a lattice Zk
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization
Thanks a lot for your attention
END
University of Lille1
Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
View publication stats

More Related Content

Similar to geometric quantization on coadjoint orbits

Functional analysis in mechanics
Functional analysis in mechanicsFunctional analysis in mechanics
Functional analysis in mechanics
Springer
 
Functional analysis in mechanics 2e
Functional analysis in mechanics  2eFunctional analysis in mechanics  2e
Functional analysis in mechanics 2e
Springer
 
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical SingularitiesReciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Lukasz Obara
 
Postdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statementPostdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statement
Susovan Pal
 

Similar to geometric quantization on coadjoint orbits (20)

Dressing2011
Dressing2011Dressing2011
Dressing2011
 
Lattices of Lie groups acting on the complex projective space
Lattices of Lie groups acting on the complex projective spaceLattices of Lie groups acting on the complex projective space
Lattices of Lie groups acting on the complex projective space
 
Some_Properties_for_the_Commutators_of_Special_Linear_Quantum_Groups (12).pdf
Some_Properties_for_the_Commutators_of_Special_Linear_Quantum_Groups (12).pdfSome_Properties_for_the_Commutators_of_Special_Linear_Quantum_Groups (12).pdf
Some_Properties_for_the_Commutators_of_Special_Linear_Quantum_Groups (12).pdf
 
Quantum gravitational corrections to particle creation by black holes
Quantum gravitational corrections to particle creation by black holesQuantum gravitational corrections to particle creation by black holes
Quantum gravitational corrections to particle creation by black holes
 
Practical computation of Hecke operators
Practical computation of Hecke operatorsPractical computation of Hecke operators
Practical computation of Hecke operators
 
Solitons Solutions to Some Evolution Equations by ExtendedTan-Cot Method
Solitons Solutions to Some Evolution Equations by ExtendedTan-Cot MethodSolitons Solutions to Some Evolution Equations by ExtendedTan-Cot Method
Solitons Solutions to Some Evolution Equations by ExtendedTan-Cot Method
 
Functional analysis in mechanics
Functional analysis in mechanicsFunctional analysis in mechanics
Functional analysis in mechanics
 
Functional analysis in mechanics 2e
Functional analysis in mechanics  2eFunctional analysis in mechanics  2e
Functional analysis in mechanics 2e
 
PRINCEPPTFINAL.pptx
PRINCEPPTFINAL.pptxPRINCEPPTFINAL.pptx
PRINCEPPTFINAL.pptx
 
Dressing2011
Dressing2011Dressing2011
Dressing2011
 
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical SingularitiesReciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
 
S. Duplij. Polyadic algebraic structures and their applications
S. Duplij. Polyadic algebraic structures and their applicationsS. Duplij. Polyadic algebraic structures and their applications
S. Duplij. Polyadic algebraic structures and their applications
 
Some fixed point theorems of expansion mapping in g-metric spaces
Some fixed point theorems of expansion mapping in g-metric spacesSome fixed point theorems of expansion mapping in g-metric spaces
Some fixed point theorems of expansion mapping in g-metric spaces
 
Some Fixed Point Theorems of Expansion Mapping In G-Metric Spaces
Some Fixed Point Theorems of Expansion Mapping In G-Metric SpacesSome Fixed Point Theorems of Expansion Mapping In G-Metric Spaces
Some Fixed Point Theorems of Expansion Mapping In G-Metric Spaces
 
A common fixed point of integral type contraction in generalized metric spacess
A  common fixed point of integral type contraction in generalized metric spacessA  common fixed point of integral type contraction in generalized metric spacess
A common fixed point of integral type contraction in generalized metric spacess
 
Postdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statementPostdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statement
 
4. Zeki Kasap.pdf
4. Zeki Kasap.pdf4. Zeki Kasap.pdf
4. Zeki Kasap.pdf
 
4. Zeki Kasap.pdf
4. Zeki Kasap.pdf4. Zeki Kasap.pdf
4. Zeki Kasap.pdf
 
S.Duplij, A q-deformed generalization of the Hosszu-Gluskin theorem
S.Duplij, A q-deformed generalization of the Hosszu-Gluskin theoremS.Duplij, A q-deformed generalization of the Hosszu-Gluskin theorem
S.Duplij, A q-deformed generalization of the Hosszu-Gluskin theorem
 
Prof. Rob Leigh (University of Illinois)
Prof. Rob Leigh (University of Illinois)Prof. Rob Leigh (University of Illinois)
Prof. Rob Leigh (University of Illinois)
 

Recently uploaded

Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Cherry
 
PODOCARPUS...........................pptx
PODOCARPUS...........................pptxPODOCARPUS...........................pptx
PODOCARPUS...........................pptx
Cherry
 
development of diagnostic enzyme assay to detect leuser virus
development of diagnostic enzyme assay to detect leuser virusdevelopment of diagnostic enzyme assay to detect leuser virus
development of diagnostic enzyme assay to detect leuser virus
NazaninKarimi6
 
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learningModule for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
levieagacer
 
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune WaterworldsBiogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Sérgio Sacani
 
LUNULARIA -features, morphology, anatomy ,reproduction etc.
LUNULARIA -features, morphology, anatomy ,reproduction etc.LUNULARIA -features, morphology, anatomy ,reproduction etc.
LUNULARIA -features, morphology, anatomy ,reproduction etc.
Cherry
 
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 bAsymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Sérgio Sacani
 
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
Scintica Instrumentation
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
 
Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx .
Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx       .Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx       .
Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx .
 
PODOCARPUS...........................pptx
PODOCARPUS...........................pptxPODOCARPUS...........................pptx
PODOCARPUS...........................pptx
 
development of diagnostic enzyme assay to detect leuser virus
development of diagnostic enzyme assay to detect leuser virusdevelopment of diagnostic enzyme assay to detect leuser virus
development of diagnostic enzyme assay to detect leuser virus
 
Thyroid Physiology_Dr.E. Muralinath_ Associate Professor
Thyroid Physiology_Dr.E. Muralinath_ Associate ProfessorThyroid Physiology_Dr.E. Muralinath_ Associate Professor
Thyroid Physiology_Dr.E. Muralinath_ Associate Professor
 
Cyanide resistant respiration pathway.pptx
Cyanide resistant respiration pathway.pptxCyanide resistant respiration pathway.pptx
Cyanide resistant respiration pathway.pptx
 
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learningModule for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
 
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune WaterworldsBiogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
 
Plasmid: types, structure and functions.
Plasmid: types, structure and functions.Plasmid: types, structure and functions.
Plasmid: types, structure and functions.
 
LUNULARIA -features, morphology, anatomy ,reproduction etc.
LUNULARIA -features, morphology, anatomy ,reproduction etc.LUNULARIA -features, morphology, anatomy ,reproduction etc.
LUNULARIA -features, morphology, anatomy ,reproduction etc.
 
Dr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical aspects
Dr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical  aspectsDr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical  aspects
Dr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical aspects
 
Terpineol and it's characterization pptx
Terpineol and it's characterization pptxTerpineol and it's characterization pptx
Terpineol and it's characterization pptx
 
TransientOffsetin14CAftertheCarringtonEventRecordedbyPolarTreeRings
TransientOffsetin14CAftertheCarringtonEventRecordedbyPolarTreeRingsTransientOffsetin14CAftertheCarringtonEventRecordedbyPolarTreeRings
TransientOffsetin14CAftertheCarringtonEventRecordedbyPolarTreeRings
 
CURRENT SCENARIO OF POULTRY PRODUCTION IN INDIA
CURRENT SCENARIO OF POULTRY PRODUCTION IN INDIACURRENT SCENARIO OF POULTRY PRODUCTION IN INDIA
CURRENT SCENARIO OF POULTRY PRODUCTION IN INDIA
 
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 bAsymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
 
Call Girls Ahmedabad +917728919243 call me Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Ahmedabad +917728919243 call me Independent Escort ServiceCall Girls Ahmedabad +917728919243 call me Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Ahmedabad +917728919243 call me Independent Escort Service
 
Early Development of Mammals (Mouse and Human).pdf
Early Development of Mammals (Mouse and Human).pdfEarly Development of Mammals (Mouse and Human).pdf
Early Development of Mammals (Mouse and Human).pdf
 
Kanchipuram Escorts 🥰 8617370543 Call Girls Offer VIP Hot Girls
Kanchipuram Escorts 🥰 8617370543 Call Girls Offer VIP Hot GirlsKanchipuram Escorts 🥰 8617370543 Call Girls Offer VIP Hot Girls
Kanchipuram Escorts 🥰 8617370543 Call Girls Offer VIP Hot Girls
 
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
 
Clean In Place(CIP).pptx .
Clean In Place(CIP).pptx                 .Clean In Place(CIP).pptx                 .
Clean In Place(CIP).pptx .
 

geometric quantization on coadjoint orbits

  • 1. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337447447 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits, Workshop on Diffeology etc,25 June 2014, Aix en Province,Marseille, France Presentation · June 2014 CITATIONS 0 READS 8 1 author: Hassan Jolany 66 PUBLICATIONS 331 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Hassan Jolany on 15 January 2024. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
  • 2. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Workshop on Diffeology etc Aix en Provence, France- June 25-26-27, 2014 Geometric Quantization On Coadjoint Orbits Hassan Jolany, University of Lille1 University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 3. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization List of sections 1 Coadjoint Orbits 2 Geometric Quantization University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 4. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Coadjoint Orbits Let G be a compact semisimple Lie group with Lie algebra g. Group G acts on dual of Lie algebra g∗ with coadjoint representation Ad∗ : G × g∗ → g∗ by convention: Ad∗ g µ, X = µ, Adg−1 X where µ ∈ g∗, g ∈ G, X ∈ g. Definition The subset Oµ = {Ad∗ g µ; g ∈ G} of g∗ is called a coadjoint orbit of G through µ ∈ g∗ Coadjoint orbit through µ ∈ g∗ can be written Oµ ∼ = G/Gµ, which the stabilizer subgroup Gµ can be written as Gµ = {g ∈ G : Ad∗ g µ = µ} University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 5. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Some Examples of Co-Adjoint Orbits University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 6. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Some Examples of Co-Adjoint Orbits University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 7. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Complexified of Lie Group Definition If G is a Lie group, a universal complexification is given by a complex Lie group GC and a continuous homomorphism ϕ : G → GC with the universal property that, if f : G → H is an arbitrary continuous homomorphism into a complex Lie group H, then there is a unique complex analytic homomorphism F : GC → H such that f = Foϕ. For a classical Real Lie group G, The complexification of Lie group GC can be defined as GC := exp{g + ig} Let G = U(n), then GC = GL(n, C) or Let K = SU(n), then KC = SL(n, C) University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 8. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Complexified of Lie Group Theorem Let G be a compact and connected Lie group, then GC ∼ = G n g∗ ∼ = T∗ G which this decomposition known as Polar Decomposition. Every coadjoint orbit Oµ can be written as Oµ ∼ = GC /P ∼ = T∗ G/P which P is the Parabolic subgroup. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 9. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Volume of a coadjoint orbits Kirillov’s Character formula: Kirillov’s famous formula says that the characters of the irreducible unitary representations of a compact Lie group G can be written by following form χλ(exp(x)) = 1 p(x) Z Oλ+ρ e2πi<µ,x> dµOλ+ρ (µ) where p is a certain function on lie algebra g and it can be written as p(x) = det1/2 sinh(ad(x/2)) ad(x/2) and µ is the highest weight University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 10. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Volume of a coadjoint orbit Theorem The Volume of a Coadjoint Orbit through µ is Vol(Oµ) = Y α∈R+ < α, µ > < α, ρ > where ρ = 1 2 P α∈R+ α University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 11. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Measure on coadjoint orbits Explicit formula for measure of coadjoint orbits: For µ ∈ g∗, we define a skew-symmetric bilinear form bµ on TeGµ Oµ ∼ = g/gµ by bµ(ū, v̄) =< µ, [u, v] > where for u, v ∈ g, we write ū, v̄ ∈ g/gµ. So, the dual form of bµ is the bilinear form βµ on (g/gµ)∗ = g⊥ µ = g.µ corresponding to bµ under this isomorphism βµ(u.µ, v.µ) = bµ(ū, v̄) University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 12. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Measure on coadjoint orbits Now choose a basis v̄1, v̄2, ..., v̄m for g/gµ and µ1, µ2, ..., µm be the dual basis for (g/gµ)∗ (where m is the maximal dimension of an orbit in g∗)then 1 (m/2)! bm/2 µ = Pf < µ, [vi , vj ] > µ1 ∧ ... ∧ µm and 1 (m/2)! βm/2 µ = Pf−1 < µ, [vi , vj ] > v̄1 ∧ ... ∧ v̄m where Pf(aij ) denotes the Pfaffian of a skew-symmetric matrix (aij ) Now define, ωµ = 1 (m/2)! βm/2 µ So integration of ωµ gives measure on Oµ up to the factor (2π)m/2 University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 13. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Geometric properties of coadjoint orbits Every coadjoint orbit is symplectic manifold. The symplectic form on Oλ is given by ωλ(ad∗ X, ad∗ Y ) = hλ, [X, Y ]i . This is obviously anti-symmetric and non-degenerate and also closed 2-form. Every coadjoint orbit has Kaehler and Hyper-Kaehler structure. Coadjont orbits are simply connected. Theorem Let G be a Lie group, and Φ : T∗G → g∗ be a moment map and ζ ∈ g∗ then the symplectic quotient Φ−1(ζ) Gζ is coadjoint orbit through ζ, i.e., Oζ. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 14. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Here, by previous theorem we see that the symplectic form on cotangent bunlde of a Lie group is related to Kostant Kirillov Souriau symplectic structure of the coadjoint orbits in the dual of a Lie algebra as follows G i // π T∗G Oζ and we have π∗ ωOζ = i∗ ωT∗G Theorem of Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour: Theorem Every connected Hausdorff symplectic manifold is isomorphic to a coadjoint orbit of its group of hamiltonian diffeomorphisms. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 15. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Geometric PDE on coadjoint orbits Following theorem known as M. Stenzel’s theorem: We denote the complexified of a coadjoint orbit as OC ζ := GC /GC ζ where ζ ∈ g∗ Theorem Let G be a compact, connected and semisimple, Lie group. There exists a G invariant, real analytic, strictly plurisubharmonic function of complexified coadjoint orbit ρ : OC ζ → [0, ∞) such that u = √ ρ satisfies the Monge-Ampere equation, (∂ ¯ ∂u)n = 0 where n = dim Oλ University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 16. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Geometric Quantization Now, we define the geometric quantization by some axioms which are compatible with physical view. Geometric quantization we associate to a symplectic manifold (M, ω) a Hilbert space H, and one associates to smooth functions f : M → R skew-adjoint operators Of : H → H. Paul Dirac introduced in his doctoral thesis, the ”method of classical analogy”for quantization which is now known as Dirac axioms as follows. 1] Poisson bracket of functions passes to commutator of operators: O{f ,g} = [Of , Og ] 2] Linearity condition must holds ,Oλ1f +λ2g = λ1Of + λ2Og for λ1, λ2 ∈ C 3] Normalization condition must holds: 1 7→ i.I(Which I is identity √ University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 17. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Dirac Principal for Geometric quantization Before to establish the axiom 4], we need to following definition. Definition Let (M, ω), be a symplectic manifold. A set of smooth functions {fj } is said to be a complete set of classical observables if and only if every other function g such that {fi , g} = 0 for all {fj }, is constant. Also we say that a family of operators is complete if it acts irreducibly on H 4] Minimality condition must holds: Any complete family of functions passes to a complete family of operators. Moreover, if G be a group acting on (M, ω) by symplectomorphisms and on H by unitary transformations. If the G-action on M is trnsitive, then its action on H must be irreducible. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 18. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Geometric Quantization Now, we again recall the pre-quantization Line bundle in formal language. In fact, we have two important method for Geometric Quantization; 1)Using line bundle. More precisely, In geometric quantization we construct the Hilbert space H as a subspace of the space of sections of a line bundle L on a symplectic manifold M. 2)Without using line bundle: Using Mpc-structure instead of line bundle. One of advantage of this construction is better behaved of physical view but definig it is not so easy. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 19. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc Quantization The use of Mpc structures clarifies and extends the traditional Konstant scheme of geometric in a number of ways. In fact, prequantized Mpc structures generalize the combined traditional data consisting of a prequantum line bundle and a metaplectic structure and are used in constructing and comparing representations of poisson algebras on symplectic manifolds. Also, Mpc structures exists on any symplectic manifold. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 20. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Group Definition Let (V , Ω) be a real symplectic vector space and fix an irreducible unitary projective representation W of V on a Hilbert space H such that x, y ∈ V ⇒ W (x)W (y) = exp{ 1 2i~ Ω(x, y)}W (x + y) . If g ∈ Sp(V , Ω), so that g is a linear automorphism of V with g∗Ω = Ω. So, by uniqueness theorem of Stone and von Neumann there exists a unitary operator U on H such that v ∈ V ⇒ W (gv) = UW (v)U−1. The group of all such operators U as g ranges over the symplectic group Sp(V , Ω) is denoted by Mpc(V , Ω) University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 21. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Group We have a central short exact sequence 1 → U(1) → Mpc (V , Ω) σ → Sp(V , Ω) → 1 where σ sends U to g. Mpc(V , Ω) supports a unique unitary character η : Mpc(V , Ω) → U(1) such that η(λ) = λ2 whenever λ ∈ U(1). The kernel of η is a connected double cover of Sp(V , Ω) called metaplectic group Mp(V , ω) University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 22. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Structure Definition Let (E, ω) be a real symplectic vector bundle over the manifold M. If the rank of E equals the dimension of V then we may model (E, ω) on (V , Ω) and define the symplectic frame bundle Sp(E, ω) = Sp(E) to be the principal Sp(V , Ω) bundle over M whose fibre over m ∈ M consists of all linear isomorphisms b : V → Em such that b∗ωm = Ω Now, we are ready to define Mpc-structure. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 23. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Structure Definition By an Mpc-structure on (E, ω) we mean a principal Mpc(V , Ω) bundle π : P → M with a fibre-preserving map φ : P → Sp(E, ω) such that the group actions are compatible: φ(p.g) = φ(p).σ(g), ∀p ∈ P, g ∈ Mpc (V , Ω) where σ : Mpc(V ) → Sp(V ) Mpc-structures for (E, ω) are parametrized by H2(M, Z). University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 24. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Quantization Definition Let (M, ω) be a symplectic manifold. A prequantized Mpc structure for (M, ω) is a pair (P, γ) with P an Mpc structure for (TM, ω) and γ an Mpc-invariant u(1)-valued one-form on P such that: if z ∈ mpc(V , Ω) = Lie(Mpc(V , Ω)) determines the fundamental vector field z̄ on P then γ(z̄) = 1 2 η∗z and dγ = (1/i~)π∗ ω where π : P → M is the bundle projection. We say that (M, ω) is quantizable iff it admits prequantized Mpc structures. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 25. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Quantization Theorem (M, ω) is quantizable if and only if [ω] − 1 2 c1(TM) be an integral cohomology class. Theorem Inequivalent prequantized Mpc structures are parametrized by H1 (M; U(1)) University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 26. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Quantization on cotangent bundle of Lie groups, T∗ G Let G be a Lie group with Lie algebra g . Take, Z = T∗G . Modle T∗G on the symplectic vector space V = g ⊕ g∗ with symplectic form Ω((ξ, φ), (η, ψ)) = φ(η) − ψ(ξ) The standard left action of G on the cotangent bundle T∗G is Hamiltonian , with equivariant moment map J : T∗ G → g∗ with J(αg ) = g.α University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 27. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Quantization on cotangent bundle of Lie groups, T∗ G A canonical global section b : T∗G → Sp(T∗G) of the symplectic frame bundle Sp(T∗G) is defined by bαg (ξ, φ) = Λ∗ √ 2(g−1 .ξ)g , 1 √ 2 (g−1 .φ − (g−1 .ξ).α)α where Λ : G × g∗ → T∗G sends (g, α) to αg an where dots signify adjoint and coadjoint action. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 28. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Quantization on cotangent bundle of Lie groups, T∗ G The Mpc structure is the product π : T∗G × Mpc(V ) → T∗G with projection T∗G × Mpc(V ) → Sp(T∗G) determined by sending (z, I) to bz; the prequantum form δ is given by δ = 1 i~ π∗ θ + 1 2 η∗ where θ is the canonical one-form on T∗G and is the flat connection in π : T∗G × Mpc(V ) → T∗G and η is the unitary character of Mpc(V ) restricting to U(1) as the squaring map. The passage of prequantized Mpc structures to Marsden Weinstein redced phase spaces here gives to us prequantized Mpc structures on coadjoint orbits.(because Marsden Weinstein redced phase spaces of T∗G is the coadjoint orbit Oλ ) University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 29. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Mpc - Quantization on coadjoint orbits For φ ∈ g∗ we denote Oφ = G.φ ⊂ g∗ its coadjoint orbit we can identify Oφ ∼ = G/Gφ, which Gφ is coadjoint stabilizer with Lie algebra gφ, and also we denote the identity component of Gφ with G0 φ . Now we explain Robinson and J. H. Rawnsley’s quantization: We know that the vanishing holonomy generalizes the Keller Maslov corrected Bohr sommerfeld rule. So we give the following theorem for quantization on coadjoint orbits University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 30. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Theorem Mpc- Quantization on coadjoint orbits: For the coadjoint orbit Oφ ∼ = G/Gφ, the vanishing holonomy condition amounts to the following requirement: That the adjoint isotropy representation Ad : G0 φ → Sp(g/h), given by Adh(ξ + gφ) = h.ξ + gφ for h ∈ G0 φ and ξ ∈ g should lift to a homomorphism τ : G0 φ → Mpc(g/h) with the property that (ηoτ)∗ = − 2 i~φ Now here we give a connection between two different quantizations on coadjoint orbits with line bundles and without line bundle, Theorem Hassan Jolany’s Theorem: Let the coadjoint orbit Oµ with pre-quantum line bundle (G ×Gµ C)⊗2 be quantizable then the coadjoint orbit Oµ is Mpc quantizable. University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 31. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Theorem Hassan Jolany’s theorem: A coadjoint orbit (Oφ, ωKKS ) is Mpc-quantizable if and only if [ω] − 1 4 X α∈R+ α belongs to a lattice Zk University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits
  • 32. Coadjoint Orbits Geometric Quantization Thanks a lot for your attention END University of Lille1 Geometric Quantization on coadjoint orbits View publication stats