Gender and Change 
Gender Inequities in Germany and 
Ethiopia
The Gender Gap Index 
• The GGI is an example of an index that we 
chose because it has the best data available 
and not because it is the best measure. The 
Gender Inequality Index is considered to be a 
better measure as it is less focused on 
economic factors and has a improved 
calculation method
Gender Inequities in our Case Study 
Countries 
Q1. Construct an appropriate graph to represent this data 
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
China .656 .664 .688 .691 .688 .687 .685 .691 
Ethiopia .595 .599 .587 .595 .602 .614 .620 .620 
Germany .752 .762 .739 .745 .753 .759 .763 .758 
Philippines .752 .763 .757 .758 .765 .769 .776 .783 
South 
Africa 
.713 .729 .723 .771 .753 .748 .750 .751 
UK .736 .744 .737 .740 .746 .746 .743 .744 
US .704 .700 .718 .717 .741 .741 .737 .739
Analyzing Your Graph 
Q2. Describe the trends in gender inequities in our case 
study countries between 2006-2013 
• General trend 
• High and Low figures 
• Anomalies 
Q3. The Philippines is ranked 5th by the GGI and 78th by 
the GII in 2013. Suggest which is the most accurate 
reflection of gender inequity in the Philippines
Ethiopia Gender Inequities 
Q4. Identify the 
components of the GGI 
that Ethiopia scores most 
highly in 
Q5. Identify the 
components of the GGI in 
which Ethiopia scores 
below the sample average
Germany Gender Inequities 
Q4. Identify the components of the 
GGI that Germany scores most 
highly in 
Q5. Identify the components of the 
GGI in which Germany scores 
below the sample average 
Q6. Identify the component of the 
GGI that scores highest and lowest 
on average

Gender and change

  • 1.
    Gender and Change Gender Inequities in Germany and Ethiopia
  • 2.
    The Gender GapIndex • The GGI is an example of an index that we chose because it has the best data available and not because it is the best measure. The Gender Inequality Index is considered to be a better measure as it is less focused on economic factors and has a improved calculation method
  • 4.
    Gender Inequities inour Case Study Countries Q1. Construct an appropriate graph to represent this data 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 China .656 .664 .688 .691 .688 .687 .685 .691 Ethiopia .595 .599 .587 .595 .602 .614 .620 .620 Germany .752 .762 .739 .745 .753 .759 .763 .758 Philippines .752 .763 .757 .758 .765 .769 .776 .783 South Africa .713 .729 .723 .771 .753 .748 .750 .751 UK .736 .744 .737 .740 .746 .746 .743 .744 US .704 .700 .718 .717 .741 .741 .737 .739
  • 5.
    Analyzing Your Graph Q2. Describe the trends in gender inequities in our case study countries between 2006-2013 • General trend • High and Low figures • Anomalies Q3. The Philippines is ranked 5th by the GGI and 78th by the GII in 2013. Suggest which is the most accurate reflection of gender inequity in the Philippines
  • 6.
    Ethiopia Gender Inequities Q4. Identify the components of the GGI that Ethiopia scores most highly in Q5. Identify the components of the GGI in which Ethiopia scores below the sample average
  • 7.
    Germany Gender Inequities Q4. Identify the components of the GGI that Germany scores most highly in Q5. Identify the components of the GGI in which Germany scores below the sample average Q6. Identify the component of the GGI that scores highest and lowest on average