Contemporary World Forum Essay

1. 1. Why is Global Governance multi-faceted?
As distinct global matters continue to transpire consciously, it compromises such adverse effects
that can mostly put a state with its citizens at such a depriving disadvantage. For instance, war
occurrences have afflicted people's quality of life and affected some countries' economic status.
However, humanity has persisted for millennia in discovering methods to efficiently manage
international affairs and avert the chaos and conflict that have existed in the past centuries. As
institutions that advocated for worldwide leadership arose, they played a role in founding
international order and consolidating state unity across the globe by enacting the fundamentals of
global governance.
Increased interconnection among nations has advanced the exchange of knowledge by bringing
peoples, cultures, communities, and states closer in an era in which issues call for increased
international collaboration (Bhagwati, 2004; McGrew, 2019). As cited by Jang, McSparren, and
Rashchupkina (2016), the scope of contemporary issues has become "global" beyond the state
government's capacity to address such issues. The former United Nations (UN) Secretary-General,
Kofi Annan, acknowledged that "no State, however powerful, can protect itself on its own" and that
"the threats we face are interconnected". According to Ramkissoon (2017), the system of global
governance is multifaceted because it encompasses several global areas of governance including
security, justice, human rights, development, trade, and finance. Global governance involves many
actors, such as intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), multinational corporations (MNCs),
international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), and states and non-state actors (NSAs).
It is indeed a fact that due to the globalization process, the existence of global governance was
formulated. As we live in one globe, it can be accentuated that we are bound to be affected and
experience the consequences of worldwide detriments. Meanwhile, fortifying and consolidating
interconnectedness among nations is essential to amplifying international camaraderie in times of
crisis. As a result, broad branches of cooperative and competitive interconnectivity among
sovereign states, transnational corporations (TNCs), expert networks, and civil societies have
surfaced, shaping the current structure flow of global governance. Likewise, global governance is
composed of diverse multiple governance aspects because it has a more expansive scope to
function its authority and legitimacy that aims to primarily accommodate and tackle significant
international issues on a global tier. To boot, executing global governance may include facing
global challenges that demand precise legal and economic competencies and a vast range of
technical knowledge and skills to operate cultural mediation.
Per the United Nations (2014), global governance encompasses the totality of institutions, policies,
norms, procedures, and initiatives through which states and their citizens try to bring more
predictability, stability, and order to their responses to transnational challenges. Carin, Higgott,
Scholte, Smith, & Stone (2006) also emphasize that the multifaceted complex of global-scale
governance does not stand alone. The various trans-world regulatory institutions and structures are
intimately interlinked with other governance apparatuses in the local, country, and regional spheres.
As Weiss (2013) also stated, global governance encompasses a wide variety of cooperative
problem-solving arrangements that may be visible but informal (e.g., practices or guidelines
governing private military companies or NGO participation in intergovernmental conferences) or
result from temporary units (e.g., coalitions of the willing in Iraq). Such arrangements may also be
more formal, taking the shape of intricate rules (international law and treaties governing the laws of
war or trade practices) as well as constituted organizations with administrative structures and
well-established practices to manage collective affairs by a variety of civil society actors at all levels.
Through various such mechanisms and arrangements, we can observe that sometimes collective
interests are articulated, rights and obligations are established, and differences are mediated.
Global governance aims to convey peace, security, dispute resolution, mediation mechanisms,
functional markets, and regulated trade and industrial standards. It also contemplates declarations
from institutions, processes, conventions, formal agreements, and informal systems that are solely

2. for the common benefit of everyone. In line with this, upholding the embodiment of
intergovernmental cooperation among state leaders is critical in achieving global development
goals, especially in policy decision-making and norm-setting. Furthermore, global governance
brings diverse actors together to collaborate on collective action internationally. In addition,
numerous alliances typically affect global governance as intermediary bodies. For instance, the
United Nations, the European Union, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are some
organizations that coordinate the policies of their constituents in a particular geographic jurisdiction.
As well as this, global governance is a fragmented and complex administration system that displays
many facets of the prevalent political, economic, environmental, and societal problems. The global
governance perspective strives to examine voids in the international system to supervise
complicated issues and to pledge stakeholders on practical measures for collective
problem-solving. Concurrently with its actors, global governance mandates sustainable and
strategic goals that can ameliorate the overall globe's different sectors, especially those in
developing and peripheral countries. It also focuses on informing successful multilateral
negotiations on assembling or reforming institutions and constructively contending recent
transnational actors from the civil society and private sectors.
Generally, global governance encompasses legislating, monitoring, and enforcing ordinances
internationally. In the bargain, the robust emergence of global governance actors seeks to
contribute to solving and dealing with interdependent issues. As intergovernmental cooperation is
at the center of the global partnership for development, effective global governance can only be
perpetrated with implicit international cooperation and mutual sovereignty respect among states.
Similarly, participating countries can simulate global awareness by integrating global governance in
building networks. Given this, exemplary global governance can conform as a beacon in our rapidly
globalizing society as it guides us through the modifications in modern human connections.

3. References
Bhagwati, J. (2004). In defense of globalization. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Carin, B., Higgott, R., Scholte, J. A., Smith, G., & Stone, D. (2006). Global Governance: Looking Ahead,
2006–2010. Global Governance, 12(1), 1–6. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27800593
Jang, J., McSparren, J., & Rashchupkina, Y. (2016). Global governance: present and future.
Palgrave Communications, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2015.45
McGrew, A. (2019). Globalization and global politics. The Globalization of World Politics, 19–35.
https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198825548.003.0001
Ramkissoon, K. (2017). Perspectives on global governance: The efficacy of the system from a
liberal institutionalist view. Ryerson Journal of Policy Studies. Retrieved from
https://www.torontomu.ca/content/dam/policystudies/journal/2017/Ramkissoon-Perspective
s-on-Global-Governance-7.pdf
United Nations. (2004). Global governance and global rules for development in the post-2015 era.
Retrieved from
https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/cdp/cdp_publications/2014cdppolicynote.pd
f
Weiss, T. G. (2013b). Global governance: A “Philadelphia Moment”?
https://doi.org/10.18289/OEF.2013.005