SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 63
1 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
2 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
CHAPTER
7
Firms,
the Stock Market, and
Corporate Governance
Fernando Quijano
Prepared by:
When Mark Zuckerberg
started Facebook in
2004, he was still a
sophomore in college.
Just five years later,
Facebook had 150
million users.
3 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
7.1 Types of Firms
Categorize the major types of firms in the
United States.
7.2 The Structure of Corporations and the
Principal–Agent Problem
Describe the typical management structure of
corporations and understand the concepts of
separation of ownership from control and the
principal–agent problem.
7.3 How Firms Raise Funds
Explain how firms raise the funds they need
to operate and expand.
7.4 Using Financial Statements to Evaluate a
Corporation
Understand the information provided in
corporations’ financial statements.
7.5 Corporate Governance Policy
Understand the role of government in
corporate governance.
Appendix: Tools to Analyze Firms’ Financial
Information
Understand the concept of present value and the
information contained on a firm’s income
statement
and balance sheet.
Chapter Outline and
Learning Objectives
CHAPTER
7
Firms,
the Stock Market, and
Corporate Governance
4 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Types of Firms
Sole proprietorship A firm owned by a
single individual and not organized as a
corporation.
Partnership A firm owned jointly by two or
more persons and not organized as a
corporation.
Corporation A legal form of business that
provides owners with protection from losing
more than their investment should the
business fail.
Categorize the major types of
firms in the United States.
7.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
5 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Asset Anything of value owned by a person or a firm.
Limited liability The legal provision that shields
owners of a corporation from losing more than they
have invested in the firm.
SOLE
PROPRIETORSHIP
PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION
ADVANTAGES • Control by owner
• No layers of
management
• Ability to share work
• Ability to share risks
• Limited personal liability
• Greater ability to raise
funds
DISADVANTAGES • Unlimited personal
liability
• Unlimited personal liability • Costly to organize
• Limited ability to raise
funds
• Limited ability to raise funds • Possible double taxation
of income
Who Is Liable? Limited and Unlimited Liability
Table 7-1
Differences among Business Organizations
Categorize the major types of
firms in the United States.
7.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Types of Firms
6 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Types of Firms
Corporations Earn the Majority of Revenue and Profits
FIGURE 7-1
Business Organizations: Sole
Proprietorships, Partnerships,
and Corporations
The three types of firms in the United States are sole proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations.
Panel (a) shows that only 19 percent of all firms are corporations.
Yet, as panels (b) and (c) show, corporations account for a large majority of the total revenue and profits
earned by all firms.
Categorize the major types of
firms in the United States.
7.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
7 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
How Important Are Small
Businesses to the U.S. Economy?
Making
the
Connection
In a typical year, 40 percent of new jobs
are created by small firms like Yelp.com,
which is a community-based review and
directory website founded by Jeremy
Stoppelman, left, and Russel Simmons.
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 1.6 at the end of
this chapter.
Entrepreneurs founding small
firms have been the source of
many of the most important
new goods and services
available to consumers.
Categorize the major types of
firms in the United States.
7.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
8 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
The Structure of Corporations
and the Principal–Agent Problem
Corporate Structure and Corporate Governance
Separation of ownership from control
A situation in a corporation in which the top
management, rather than the shareholders,
control day-to-day operations.
Corporate governance The way in which a
corporation is structured and the effect a
corporation’s structure has on the firm’s behavior.
Principal–agent problem A problem caused by
an agent pursuing his own interests rather than
the interests of the principal who hired him.
Describe the typical management
structure of corporations and
understand the concepts of
separation of ownership from control
and the principal–agent problem.
7.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
9 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Solved Problem 7-2
Does the Principal–Agent Problem Apply to the
Relationship between Managers and Workers?
Briefly explain whether you agree with the following
argument:
The principal–agent problem applies not just to the
relationship between shareholders and top managers.
It also applies to the relationship between managers
and workers.
Just as shareholders have trouble monitoring whether
top managers are earning as much profit as possible,
managers have trouble monitoring whether workers
are working as hard as possible.
YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problems 2.4 and 2.5 at the end of
this chapter.
Describe the typical management
structure of corporations and
understand the concepts of
separation of ownership from control
and the principal–agent problem.
7.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
10 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
11 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
12 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
CHAPTER
12
Monopolistic
Competition: The
Competitive Model
in a More Realistic
Setting
Fernando
Quijano
Prepared by:
The coffeehouse market is
competitive because it is
inexpensive to open a new
store. Hundreds of firms in
the United States operate
coffeehouses.
13 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Monopolistic
Competition: The
Competitive Model
in a More Realistic
Setting
12.1. Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm in a
Monopolistically Competitive Market
Explain why a monopolistically competitive firm has
downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue curves.
12.2 How a Monopolistically Competitive Firm
Maximizes Profit in the Short Run
Explain how a monopolistically competitive
firm maximizes profit in the short run.
12.3 What Happens to Profits in the Long Run?
Analyze the situation of a monopolistically competitive firm
in the long run.
12.4 Comparing Perfect Competition and Monopolistic
Competition
Compare the efficiency of monopolistic competition and
perfect competition.
12.5 How Marketing Differentiates Products
Define marketing and explain
how firms use it to differentiate their products.
12.6 What Makes a Firm Successful?
Identify the key factors that determine a firm’s success.
Chapter Outline and
Learning Objectives
CHAPTER
12
14 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Monopolistic competition
A market structure in which barriers
to entry are low and many firms
compete by selling similar, but not
identical, products.
Monopolistic Competition:
The Competitive Model in a More Realistic Setting
15 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
The Demand Curve for a Monopolistically Competitive Firm
FIGURE 12-1
The Downward-Sloping
Demand for Caffè
Lattes at a Starbucks
Explain why a monopolistically
competitive firm has downward-sloping
demand and marginal revenue curves.
12.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm
in a Monopolistically Competitive Market
If a Starbucks increases the price
of caffè lattes, it will lose some,
but not all, of its customers.
In this case, raising the price from
$3.00 to $3.25 reduces the
quantity of caffè lattes sold from
3,000 to 2,400.
Therefore, unlike a perfect
competitor, a Starbucks store
faces a downward-sloping
demand curve.
16 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Marginal Revenue for a Firm with a Downward-Sloping
Demand Curve
Table 12-1
CAFFÈ LATTES SOLD
PER WEEK (Q)
PRICE (P)
TOTAL
REVENUE
(TR = P x Q)
AVERAGE
REVENUE
(AR = TR/Q)
MARGINAL
REVENUE
(MR = ΔTR/ΔQ)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
$6.00
5.50
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
$0.00
5.50
10.00
13.50
16.00
17.50
18.00
17.50
16.00
13.50
10.00
―
$5.50
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
―
$5.50
4.50
3.50
2.50
1.50
0.50
–0.50
–1.50
–2.50
–3.50
Explain why a monopolistically
competitive firm has downward-sloping
demand and marginal revenue curves.
12.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Demand and Marginal
Revenue at a Starbucks
Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm
in a Monopolistically Competitive Market
17 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Marginal Revenue for a Firm with a Downward-Sloping
Demand Curve
FIGURE 12-2
How a Price Cut
Affects a Firm’s
Revenue
Explain why a monopolistically
competitive firm has downward-sloping
demand and marginal revenue curves.
12.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
If the local Starbucks reduces
the price of a caffè latte from
$3.50 to $3.00, the number of
caffè lattes it sells per week will
increase from 5 to 6.
Its marginal revenue from
selling the sixth caffè latte will
be $0.50, which is equal to the
$3.00 additional revenue from
selling 1 more caffè latte (the
area of the green box)
minus the $2.50 loss in
revenue from selling the first 5
caffè lattes for $0.50 less each
(the area of the red box).
Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm
in a Monopolistically Competitive Market
18 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
FIGURE 12-3
The Demand and
Marginal Revenue
Curves for a
Monopolistically
Competitive Firm
Marginal Revenue for a Firm with a Downward-Sloping
Demand Curve
Any firm that has the ability to affect
the price of the product it sells will
have a marginal revenue curve that
is below its demand curve.
We plot the data from Table 12-1 to
create the demand and marginal
revenue curves.
After the sixth caffè latte, marginal
revenue becomes negative
because the additional revenue
received from selling 1 more caffè
latte is smaller than the revenue
lost from receiving a lower price on
the caffè lattes that could have
been sold at the original price.
Explain why a monopolistically
competitive firm has downward-sloping
demand and marginal revenue curves.
12.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm
in a Monopolistically Competitive Market
19 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
How a Monopolistically Competitive
Firm Maximizes Profit in the Short Run
FIGURE 12-4
Maximizing Profit
in a
Monopolistically
Competitive Market
Explain how a monopolistically competitive
firm maximizes profit in the short run.
12.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
20 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Will Apple maximize profits if it
produces 800,000 iPhones per
month?
Does Minimizing Cost Maximize
Profits?
Solved Problem 12-2
Average cost reaches a minimum
at a quantity of 800,000, but profits
are maximized at a quantity of
600,000.
YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problem 2.6 at the end of this
chapter.
Explain how a monopolistically competitive
firm maximizes profit in the short run.
12.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
21 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
What Happens to Profits in the Long Run?
How Does the Entry of New Firms Affect the Profits of Existing Firms?
FIGURE 12-5
How Entry of New Firms Eliminates
Profits
Panel (a) shows that in the short run Starbucks can charge a price above average total cost (point A) and make a
profit, shown by the green rectangle. But this profit attracts new firms to enter the market, which shifts the demand
and marginal revenue curves to the curves labeled “Long run” in panel (b). At point B, Starbucks breaks even.
Analyze the situation of a monopolistically
competitive firm in the long run.
12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
22 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Table 12-2
The Short Run and
the Long Run for a
Monopolistically
Competitive Firm
How Does the Entry of New Firms Affect the Profits of Existing Firms?
What Happens to Profits in the Long Run? Analyze the situation of a monopolistically
competitive firm in the long run.
12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
23 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
The Rise and Decline of Starbucks
Making
the
Connection
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 3.6 at the end
of this chapter.
Starbucks: No longer different
enough?
In a monopolistically
competitive industry,
maintaining profits in the
long run is very difficult.
Analyze the situation of a monopolistically
competitive firm in the long run.
12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
24 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Is Zero Economic Profit Inevitable in the Long Run?
What Happens to Profits in the Long Run?
A firm’s profits will be eliminated in
the long run only if a firm stands still
and fails to find new ways of
differentiating its product or fails to
find new ways of lowering the cost
of producing its product.
Analyze the situation of a monopolistically
competitive firm in the long run.
12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Don’t Let This Happen to YOU!
Don’t Confuse Zero Economic Profit with Zero Accounting Profit
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 3.4 at the end
of this chapter.
25 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Can It Be Profitable to Be
the High-Price Seller?
Solved Problem 12-3
YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problem 3.7 at the end of this
chapter.
Because the greater demand more than offsets the higher costs, the hhgregg store
makes a larger profit.
Analyze the situation of a monopolistically
competitive firm in the long run.
12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
26 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
• Monopolistically competitive firms charge a price
greater than marginal cost.
• Monopolistically competitive firms do not produce at
minimum average total cost.
Monopolistic competition and perfect competition share the
characteristic that in long-run equilibrium, firms earn zero
economic profits.
However, there are two important differences between long-
run equilibrium in the two markets:
Compare the efficiency of monopolistic
competition and perfect competition.
12.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Comparing Perfect Competition
and Monopolistic Competition
27 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Excess Capacity under Monopolistic Competition
FIGURE 12-6
Comparing Long-Run Equilibrium under
Perfect Competition and Monopolistic
Competition
Comparing Perfect Competition
and Monopolistic Competition
A monopolistically competitive firm has excess capacity: If it increased its output, it
could produce at a lower average cost.
Compare the efficiency of monopolistic
competition and perfect competition.
12.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
28 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Economists have debated whether monopolistically
competitive markets being neither productively nor
allocatively efficient results in a significant loss of
well-being to society in these markets compared with
perfectly competitive markets.
How Consumers Benefit from Monopolistic Competition
Consumers benefit from being able to purchase a
product that is differentiated and more closely suited
to their tastes.
Is Monopolistic Competition Inefficient?
Compare the efficiency of monopolistic
competition and perfect competition.
12.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Comparing Perfect Competition
and Monopolistic Competition
29 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Abercrombie & Fitch: Can the
Product Be Too Differentiated?
Did Abercrombie and Fitch narrow its target
market too much?
Making
the
Connection
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 4.6 at the end
of this chapter.
Compare the efficiency of monopolistic
competition and perfect competition.
12.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
A firm whose strategy of
product differentiation
succeeds will experience
increases in same-store
sales.
30 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
How Marketing Differentiates Products
Marketing All the activities
necessary for a firm to sell a
product to a consumer.
Brand Management
Brand management The
actions of a firm intended to
maintain the differentiation of
a product over time.
Define marketing and explain
how firms use it to differentiate their
products.
12.5 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
31 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
If the increase in revenue that results from the
advertising is greater than the increase in costs, the
firm’s profits will rise.
Advertising
How Marketing Differentiates Products Define marketing and explain
how firms use it to differentiate their
products.
12.5 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
Defending a Brand Name
A firm can apply for a trademark, which grants legal
protection against other firms using its product’s
name.
32 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Google Tries (and Fails) to
Measure the Effectiveness
of Radio Advertising
Making
the
Connection
Does spending on radio
advertising attract
customers?
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 5.7 at the end
of this chapter.
Define marketing and explain
how firms use it to differentiate their
products.
A firm’s optimal level of
advertising occurs where the
marginal cost of advertising
equals the marginal revenue
earned from advertising.
12.5 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
33 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
What Makes a Firm Successful?
FIGURE 12-7
What Makes a Firm
Successful?
Identify the key factors that
determine a firm’s success.
12.6 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
The factors under a firm’s control—the
ability to differentiate its product and the
ability to produce it at lower cost—
combine with the factors beyond its
control to determine the firm’s
profitability.
34 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Although not first to market, Bic
ultimately was more successful
than the firm that pioneered
ballpoint pens.
Is Being the First Firm in
the Market a Key to Success?
Making
the
Connection
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 6.6 at the end
of this chapter.
Identify the key factors that
determine a firm’s success.
12.6 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
The firms that were first to introduce a
product ultimately lost out to
latecomers who did a better job of
providing consumers with products
that were more reliable, less
expensive, more convenient, or
otherwise provided greater value.
35 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Starbucks Faces
McCompetition
AN INSIDE LOOK
>>
The effect of entry on price, quantity, and profits at Starbucks.
36 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
37 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
CHAPTER
13
Oligopoly:
Firms in Less
Competitive Markets
Fernando
Quijano
Prepared by:
Today, in the
software and
computer
industries, fewer
than 10 firms
account for the
great majority of
sales.
38 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
CHAPTER
13
Oligopoly:
Firms in Less
Competitive Markets
13.1 Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry
Show how barriers to entry explain
the existence of oligopolies.
13.2 Using Game Theory to Analyze
Oligopoly
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.3 Sequential Games and Business
Strategy
Use sequential games to analyze
business strategies.
13.4 The Five Competitive Forces
Model
Use the five competitive forces
model to analyze competition in an
industry.
Chapter Outline and
Learning Objectives
39 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Oligopoly: Firms in Less Competitive Markets
Oligopoly A market structure
in which a small number of
interdependent firms compete.
40 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry
RETAIL TRADE MANUFACTURING
INDUSTRY
FOUR-FIRM
CONCENTRATION
RATIO INDUSTRY
FOUR-FIRM
CONCENTRATION
RATIO
Discount department stores 95% Cigarettes 95%
Warehouse clubs and
supercenters
92% Beer 91%
Hobby, toy, and game stores 72% Aircraft 81%
Athletic footwear stores 71% Breakfast cereal 78%
College bookstores 70% Automobiles 76%
Radio, television, and other
electronic stores
69% Computers 75%
Pharmacies and drugstores 53% Dog and cat food 64%
Table 13-1
Examples of Oligopolies in
Retail Trade and
Manufacturing
Show how barriers to entry explain
the existence of oligopolies.
13.1 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
41 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry
Barriers to Entry
Barrier to entry Anything that
keeps new firms from entering an
industry in which firms are earning
economic profits.
Economies of Scale
Economies of scale The
situation when a firm’s long-run
average costs fall as it increases
output.
Show how barriers to entry explain
the existence of oligopolies.
13.1 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
42 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
FIGURE 13-1
Economies of Scale
Help Determine the
Extent of Competition in
an Industry
Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry
Barriers to Entry
Economies of Scale
An industry will be competitive if the
minimum point on the typical firm’s
long-run average cost curve (LRAC1)
occurs at a level of output that is a
small fraction of total industry sales,
such as Q1.
The industry will be an oligopoly if
the minimum point comes at a level
of output that is a large fraction of
industry sales, such as Q2.
Show how barriers to entry explain
the existence of oligopolies.
13.1 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
43 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
If production of a good requires a
particular input, then control of that
input can be a barrier to entry.
Government-Imposed Barriers
Patent The exclusive right to a
product for a period of 20 years
from the date the product is
invented.
Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry
Barriers to Entry
Ownership of a Key Input
Show how barriers to entry explain
the existence of oligopolies.
13.1 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
44 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Using Game Theory to
Analyze Oligopoly
Game theory The study of how people make
decisions in situations in which attaining their
goals depends on their interactions with
others; in economics, the study of the
decisions of firms in industries where the
profits of each firm depend on its interactions
with other firms.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
45 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Using Game Theory to
Analyze Oligopoly
All games share three key characteristics:
1. Rules that determine what actions
are allowable
2. Strategies that players employ to
attain their objectives in the game
3. Payoffs that are the results of the
interaction among the players’
strategies
Business strategy Actions taken by a firm
to achieve a goal, such as maximizing
profits.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
46 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Using Game Theory to
Analyze Oligopoly
A Duopoly Game: Price Competition between Two Firms
FIGURE 13-2
A Duopoly Game
HP’s profits are in blue, and
Apple’s profits are in red.
HP and Apple would each
make profits of $10 million per
month on sales of desktop
computers if they both
charged $1,200.
However, each firm has an
incentive to undercut the other
by charging a lower price.
If both firms charge $1,000,
they would each make a profit
of only $7.5 million per month.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
Don’t Let This Happen to YOU!
Don’t Misunderstand Why Each Manager Ends Up Charging a Price of $1,000
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 2.14 at the
end of this chapter.
47 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Payoff matrix A table that shows the payoffs that each firm
earns from every combination of strategies by the firms.
Collusion An agreement among firms to charge the same
price or otherwise not to compete.
Using Game Theory to
Analyze Oligopoly
A Duopoly Game: Price Competition between Two Firms
Dominant strategy A strategy that is the best for a firm, no
matter what strategies other firms use.
Nash equilibrium A situation in which each firm chooses the
best strategy, given the strategies chosen by other firms.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
48 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Cooperative equilibrium An equilibrium in a
game in which players cooperate to increase their
mutual payoff.
Noncooperative equilibrium An equilibrium in a
game in which players do not cooperate but pursue
their own self-interest.
Prisoner’s dilemma A game in which pursuing
dominant strategies results in noncooperation that
leaves everyone worse off.
Using Game Theory to
Analyze Oligopoly
Firm Behavior and the Prisoner’s Dilemma
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
49 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Solved Problem 13-2
Is Advertising a Prisoner’s Dilemma
for Coca-Cola and Pepsi?
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problems 2.11, 2.12, and 2.13 at
the end of this chapter.
Given that Coca-Cola is advertising, Pepsi’s best strategy is to
advertise. Therefore, advertising is the optimal decision for both
firms, given the decision by the other firm.
50 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Is There a Dominant Strategy
for Bidding on eBay?
Making
the
Connection
On eBay, bidding the maximum value you place on an
item is a dominant strategy.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 2.15 at the
end of this chapter.
51 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
FIGURE 13-3
Changing the Payoff Matrix
in a Repeated Game
Using Game Theory to
Analyze Oligopoly
Can Firms Escape the Prisoner’s Dilemma?
Wal-Mart and Target can change the
payoff matrix for selling PlayStation 3
game consoles by advertising that they
will match their competitor’s price. This
retaliation strategy provides a signal that
one store charging a lower price will be
met automatically by the other store
charging a lower price.
In the payoff matrix in panel (a), there is
no matching offer, and each store
benefits if it charges $300 when the
other charges $500.
In the payoff matrix in panel (b), with the
matching offer, the companies have
only two choices: They can charge $500
and receive a profit of $10,000 per
month, or they can charge $300 and
receive a profit of $7,500 per month.
The equilibrium shifts from the
prisoner’s dilemma result of both stores
charging the low price and receiving low
profits to both stores charging the high
price and receiving high profits.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
52 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Using Game Theory to
Analyze Oligopoly
Can Firms Escape the Prisoner’s Dilemma?
Price leadership A form of implicit
collusion in which one firm in an
oligopoly announces a price
change and the other firms in the
industry match the change.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
53 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
American Airlines and
Northwest Airlines
Fail to Cooperate on a Price Increase
Making
the
Connection
The airlines have trouble
raising the price this business
traveler pays for a ticket.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
Airlines therefore continually
adjust their prices while at the
same time monitoring their rivals’
prices and retaliating against them
either for cutting prices or failing to
go along with price increases.
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problems 2.17 and
2.18 at the end of this chapter.
54 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
FIGURE 13-4
Oil Prices, 1972 to mid–
2009
Cartel A group of firms that collude by agreeing
to restrict output to increase prices and profits.
Using Game Theory to
Analyze Oligopoly
Cartels: The Case of OPEC
The blue line shows the price of a
barrel of oil in each year.
The red line measures the price of
a barrel of oil in terms of the
purchasing power of the dollar in
2009.
By reducing oil production, OPEC
was able to raise the world price of
oil in the mid-1970s and early
1980s. Sustaining high prices has
been difficult over the long run,
however, because members often
exceed their output quotas.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
55 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
FIGURE 13-5
The OPEC Cartel with
Unequal Members
Using Game Theory to
Analyze Oligopoly
Cartels: The Case of OPEC
Because Saudi Arabia can
produce much more oil than
Nigeria, its output decisions have
a much larger effect on the price
of oil.
In the figure, Low Output
corresponds to cooperating with
the OPEC-assigned output quota,
and High Output corresponds to
producing at maximum capacity.
Saudi Arabia has a dominant
strategy to cooperate and produce
a low output.
Nigeria, however, has a dominant
strategy not to cooperate and
instead produce a high output.
Therefore, the equilibrium of this
game will occur with Saudi Arabia
producing a low output and
Nigeria producing a high output.
Use game theory to analyze the
strategies of oligopolistic firms.
13.2 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
56 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
FIGURE 13-6
The Decision Tree for
an
Entry Game
Sequential Games and
Business Strategy
Deterring Entry
HP earns its highest return if it
charges $600 for its netbook and
Apple does not enter the market.
But at that price, Apple will enter
the market, and HP will earn only
16 percent.
If HP charges $275, Apple will
not enter because Apple will
suffer an economic loss by
receiving only a 5 percent return
on its investment.
Therefore, HP’s best decision is
to deter Apple’s entry by
charging $275.
HP will earn an economic profit
by receiving a 20 percent return
on its investment.
Note that the dashes indicate the
situation where Apple does not
enter the market, and so makes
no investment and receives no
return.
Use sequential games to analyze
business strategies.
13.3 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
57 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Solved Problem 13-3
Is Deterring Entry Always a Good Idea?
Use sequential games to analyze
business strategies.
13.3 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problem 3.3 at the end of this
chapter.
Deterrence is worth pursuing only if the payoff is higher than for
other strategies. In this case, expanding the market for netbooks
by charging a lower price has a higher payoff, even given that
Apple will enter the market.
58 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
FIGURE 13-7
The Decision Tree
for a Bargaining
Game
Sequential Games and
Business Strategy
Bargaining
Dell earns the highest profit
if it offers a contract price of
$20 per copy and TruImage
accepts the contract.
TruImage earns the highest
profit if Dell offers it a
contract of $30 per copy
and it accepts the contract.
TruImage may attempt to
bargain by threatening to
reject a $20-per-copy
contract. But Dell knows
this threat is not credible
because once Dell has
offered a $20-per-copy
contract, TruImage’s profits
are higher if it accepts the
contract than if it rejects it.
Use sequential games to analyze
business strategies.
13.3 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
59 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
FIGURE 13-8
The Five
Competitive
Forces Model
The Five Competitive Forces Model
Michael Porter’s model
identifies five forces that
determine the level of
competition in an industry:
(1) competition from
existing firms,
(2) the threat from new
entrants,
(3) competition from
substitute goods or
services,
(4) the bargaining power of
buyers, and
(5) the bargaining power of
suppliers.
Use the five competitive forces
model to analyze competition in an
industry.
13.4 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
60 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Competition among firms in an industry can lower
prices and profits.
Competition in the form of advertising, better
customer service, or longer warranties can also
reduce profits by raising costs.
Firms face competition from companies that
currently are not in the market but might enter. We
have already seen how actions taken to deter entry
can reduce profits.
The Five Competitive Forces Model
Competition from Existing Firms
The Threat from Potential Entrants
Use the five competitive forces
model to analyze competition in an
industry.
13.4 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
61 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Firms are always vulnerable to competitors
introducing a new product that fills a consumer
need better than their current product does.
If buyers have enough bargaining power, they can
insist on lower prices, higher-quality products, or
additional services.
If many firms can supply an input and the input is
not specialized, the suppliers are unlikely to have
the bargaining power to limit a firm’s profits.
The Five Competitive Forces Model
Competition from Substitute Goods or Services
The Bargaining Power of Buyers
The Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Use the five competitive forces
model to analyze competition in an
industry.
13.4 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
62 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Can We Predict Which Firms
Will Continue to Be Successful?
Making
the
Connection
Unfortunately, Circuit City’s
excellence as a company
didn’t last.
Use the five competitive forces
model to analyze competition in an
industry.
13.4 LEARNING
OBJECTIVE
Is it possible to draw general
conclusions about which business
strategies are likely to be
successful in the future?
YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 4.5 at the end
of this chapter.
63 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e.
Chapte
Hewlett-Packard Uses New Technology to
Boost Sales of Personal Computers
AN INSIDE LOOK
>>
Dell decides whether to sell touch-sensitive personal computers.

More Related Content

Similar to Ge273.u9.pp1

CHAPTER 5McGraw-HillIrwinCopyright © 2015 by the Mc.docx
CHAPTER 5McGraw-HillIrwinCopyright © 2015 by the Mc.docxCHAPTER 5McGraw-HillIrwinCopyright © 2015 by the Mc.docx
CHAPTER 5McGraw-HillIrwinCopyright © 2015 by the Mc.docxchristinemaritza
 
1.1 enterprise and entrepreneurs and the uk economy (part 2) - moodle
1.1   enterprise and entrepreneurs and the uk economy (part 2) - moodle1.1   enterprise and entrepreneurs and the uk economy (part 2) - moodle
1.1 enterprise and entrepreneurs and the uk economy (part 2) - moodleMissHowardHA
 
DealMarket DIGEST Issue 167 // 19 December 2014
DealMarket DIGEST Issue 167 // 19 December 2014DealMarket DIGEST Issue 167 // 19 December 2014
DealMarket DIGEST Issue 167 // 19 December 2014CAR FOR YOU
 
The U.S. Business Environment1Copyright © 2012 Pearson.docx
The U.S. Business Environment1Copyright © 2012 Pearson.docxThe U.S. Business Environment1Copyright © 2012 Pearson.docx
The U.S. Business Environment1Copyright © 2012 Pearson.docxchristalgrieg
 
Understanding Canadian Business Canadian 9th Edition Nickels Solutions Manual
Understanding Canadian Business Canadian 9th Edition Nickels Solutions ManualUnderstanding Canadian Business Canadian 9th Edition Nickels Solutions Manual
Understanding Canadian Business Canadian 9th Edition Nickels Solutions ManualAspenAspenA
 
Chapter 1 Introduction to Entrepreneurship.ppt
Chapter 1 Introduction to Entrepreneurship.pptChapter 1 Introduction to Entrepreneurship.ppt
Chapter 1 Introduction to Entrepreneurship.pptSaidAbdirahman2
 
Capitalising on Complexity - Insights from the Global CEO Study
Capitalising on Complexity - Insights from the Global CEO StudyCapitalising on Complexity - Insights from the Global CEO Study
Capitalising on Complexity - Insights from the Global CEO StudyThink Ethnic
 
Kim Coupounas - B Corp - Impact Unleashed 2017
Kim Coupounas - B Corp - Impact Unleashed 2017Kim Coupounas - B Corp - Impact Unleashed 2017
Kim Coupounas - B Corp - Impact Unleashed 2017Caitlyn Dudas
 
BESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptx
BESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptxBESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptx
BESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptxMylaLuay
 
Chapter 2.ppt
Chapter 2.pptChapter 2.ppt
Chapter 2.pptdhonggipa
 
barringer_e5_ppt_01.ppt
barringer_e5_ppt_01.pptbarringer_e5_ppt_01.ppt
barringer_e5_ppt_01.pptDavid Raju N
 
Business & Society
Business & SocietyBusiness & Society
Business & SocietyFarah Latiff
 
Essay About Poor Time Management. Online assignment writing service.
Essay About Poor Time Management. Online assignment writing service.Essay About Poor Time Management. Online assignment writing service.
Essay About Poor Time Management. Online assignment writing service.Lisa Richardson
 

Similar to Ge273.u9.pp1 (20)

Micro ch8 ppt
Micro ch8 pptMicro ch8 ppt
Micro ch8 ppt
 
CHAPTER 5McGraw-HillIrwinCopyright © 2015 by the Mc.docx
CHAPTER 5McGraw-HillIrwinCopyright © 2015 by the Mc.docxCHAPTER 5McGraw-HillIrwinCopyright © 2015 by the Mc.docx
CHAPTER 5McGraw-HillIrwinCopyright © 2015 by the Mc.docx
 
1.1 enterprise and entrepreneurs and the uk economy (part 2) - moodle
1.1   enterprise and entrepreneurs and the uk economy (part 2) - moodle1.1   enterprise and entrepreneurs and the uk economy (part 2) - moodle
1.1 enterprise and entrepreneurs and the uk economy (part 2) - moodle
 
DealMarket DIGEST Issue 167 // 19 December 2014
DealMarket DIGEST Issue 167 // 19 December 2014DealMarket DIGEST Issue 167 // 19 December 2014
DealMarket DIGEST Issue 167 // 19 December 2014
 
The U.S. Business Environment1Copyright © 2012 Pearson.docx
The U.S. Business Environment1Copyright © 2012 Pearson.docxThe U.S. Business Environment1Copyright © 2012 Pearson.docx
The U.S. Business Environment1Copyright © 2012 Pearson.docx
 
Understanding Canadian Business Canadian 9th Edition Nickels Solutions Manual
Understanding Canadian Business Canadian 9th Edition Nickels Solutions ManualUnderstanding Canadian Business Canadian 9th Edition Nickels Solutions Manual
Understanding Canadian Business Canadian 9th Edition Nickels Solutions Manual
 
Chapter 1 Introduction to Entrepreneurship.ppt
Chapter 1 Introduction to Entrepreneurship.pptChapter 1 Introduction to Entrepreneurship.ppt
Chapter 1 Introduction to Entrepreneurship.ppt
 
BESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptx
BESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptxBESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptx
BESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptx
 
Capitalising on Complexity - Insights from the Global CEO Study
Capitalising on Complexity - Insights from the Global CEO StudyCapitalising on Complexity - Insights from the Global CEO Study
Capitalising on Complexity - Insights from the Global CEO Study
 
Kim Coupounas - B Corp - Impact Unleashed 2017
Kim Coupounas - B Corp - Impact Unleashed 2017Kim Coupounas - B Corp - Impact Unleashed 2017
Kim Coupounas - B Corp - Impact Unleashed 2017
 
BESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptx
BESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptxBESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptx
BESR PS 12 Q3 0101.pptx
 
Chapter 2.ppt
Chapter 2.pptChapter 2.ppt
Chapter 2.ppt
 
Aalto EE Profile Toolbox 2_2013
Aalto EE Profile Toolbox 2_2013Aalto EE Profile Toolbox 2_2013
Aalto EE Profile Toolbox 2_2013
 
Dupont Essay
Dupont EssayDupont Essay
Dupont Essay
 
barringer_e5_ppt_01.ppt
barringer_e5_ppt_01.pptbarringer_e5_ppt_01.ppt
barringer_e5_ppt_01.ppt
 
barringer_e5_ppt_01.ppt
barringer_e5_ppt_01.pptbarringer_e5_ppt_01.ppt
barringer_e5_ppt_01.ppt
 
Business & Society
Business & SocietyBusiness & Society
Business & Society
 
Essay About Poor Time Management. Online assignment writing service.
Essay About Poor Time Management. Online assignment writing service.Essay About Poor Time Management. Online assignment writing service.
Essay About Poor Time Management. Online assignment writing service.
 
Directions16_Mind-The-Gap
Directions16_Mind-The-GapDirections16_Mind-The-Gap
Directions16_Mind-The-Gap
 
LESSON 2 bf.pptx
LESSON 2 bf.pptxLESSON 2 bf.pptx
LESSON 2 bf.pptx
 

More from Subas Nandy

Les7e ppt ada_0103
Les7e ppt ada_0103Les7e ppt ada_0103
Les7e ppt ada_0103Subas Nandy
 
Les7e ppt ada_0102
Les7e ppt ada_0102Les7e ppt ada_0102
Les7e ppt ada_0102Subas Nandy
 
Les7e ppt ada_0101
Les7e ppt ada_0101Les7e ppt ada_0101
Les7e ppt ada_0101Subas Nandy
 
Week1 newtons laws_of_motion
Week1 newtons laws_of_motionWeek1 newtons laws_of_motion
Week1 newtons laws_of_motionSubas Nandy
 
052516 week11 quantum computers
052516 week11 quantum computers052516 week11 quantum computers
052516 week11 quantum computersSubas Nandy
 
052516 week11 quantum3
052516 week11 quantum3052516 week11 quantum3
052516 week11 quantum3Subas Nandy
 
052516 week11 quantum2
052516 week11 quantum2052516 week11 quantum2
052516 week11 quantum2Subas Nandy
 
052516 week11 quantum1
052516 week11 quantum1052516 week11 quantum1
052516 week11 quantum1Subas Nandy
 
0511 week10 resonance
0511 week10 resonance0511 week10 resonance
0511 week10 resonanceSubas Nandy
 
0511 week10 second_reflection
0511 week10 second_reflection0511 week10 second_reflection
0511 week10 second_reflectionSubas Nandy
 
0511 week10 reflection and refraction
0511 week10  reflection and refraction0511 week10  reflection and refraction
0511 week10 reflection and refractionSubas Nandy
 
Sound&resonance
Sound&resonanceSound&resonance
Sound&resonanceSubas Nandy
 
051116 week9 waves
051116 week9 waves051116 week9 waves
051116 week9 wavesSubas Nandy
 
050316 week8 c12-electromagnetic_waves
050316 week8 c12-electromagnetic_waves050316 week8 c12-electromagnetic_waves
050316 week8 c12-electromagnetic_wavesSubas Nandy
 
050316 week 8_electromagnetism (1)
050316 week 8_electromagnetism (1)050316 week 8_electromagnetism (1)
050316 week 8_electromagnetism (1)Subas Nandy
 
0503 week8 electromagnetism
0503 week8 electromagnetism0503 week8 electromagnetism
0503 week8 electromagnetismSubas Nandy
 
Ge273.u7 ho4e micro_ch11_1click
Ge273.u7 ho4e micro_ch11_1clickGe273.u7 ho4e micro_ch11_1click
Ge273.u7 ho4e micro_ch11_1clickSubas Nandy
 
042416 week7 powerpoint elec_mag (1)
042416 week7 powerpoint elec_mag (1)042416 week7 powerpoint elec_mag (1)
042416 week7 powerpoint elec_mag (1)Subas Nandy
 
042416 week7 elec_magnet
042416 week7 elec_magnet042416 week7 elec_magnet
042416 week7 elec_magnetSubas Nandy
 

More from Subas Nandy (20)

Les7e ppt ada_0103
Les7e ppt ada_0103Les7e ppt ada_0103
Les7e ppt ada_0103
 
Les7e ppt ada_0102
Les7e ppt ada_0102Les7e ppt ada_0102
Les7e ppt ada_0102
 
Les7e ppt ada_0101
Les7e ppt ada_0101Les7e ppt ada_0101
Les7e ppt ada_0101
 
Week1 newtons laws_of_motion
Week1 newtons laws_of_motionWeek1 newtons laws_of_motion
Week1 newtons laws_of_motion
 
Les5e ppt 05
Les5e ppt 05Les5e ppt 05
Les5e ppt 05
 
052516 week11 quantum computers
052516 week11 quantum computers052516 week11 quantum computers
052516 week11 quantum computers
 
052516 week11 quantum3
052516 week11 quantum3052516 week11 quantum3
052516 week11 quantum3
 
052516 week11 quantum2
052516 week11 quantum2052516 week11 quantum2
052516 week11 quantum2
 
052516 week11 quantum1
052516 week11 quantum1052516 week11 quantum1
052516 week11 quantum1
 
0511 week10 resonance
0511 week10 resonance0511 week10 resonance
0511 week10 resonance
 
0511 week10 second_reflection
0511 week10 second_reflection0511 week10 second_reflection
0511 week10 second_reflection
 
0511 week10 reflection and refraction
0511 week10  reflection and refraction0511 week10  reflection and refraction
0511 week10 reflection and refraction
 
Sound&resonance
Sound&resonanceSound&resonance
Sound&resonance
 
051116 week9 waves
051116 week9 waves051116 week9 waves
051116 week9 waves
 
050316 week8 c12-electromagnetic_waves
050316 week8 c12-electromagnetic_waves050316 week8 c12-electromagnetic_waves
050316 week8 c12-electromagnetic_waves
 
050316 week 8_electromagnetism (1)
050316 week 8_electromagnetism (1)050316 week 8_electromagnetism (1)
050316 week 8_electromagnetism (1)
 
0503 week8 electromagnetism
0503 week8 electromagnetism0503 week8 electromagnetism
0503 week8 electromagnetism
 
Ge273.u7 ho4e micro_ch11_1click
Ge273.u7 ho4e micro_ch11_1clickGe273.u7 ho4e micro_ch11_1click
Ge273.u7 ho4e micro_ch11_1click
 
042416 week7 powerpoint elec_mag (1)
042416 week7 powerpoint elec_mag (1)042416 week7 powerpoint elec_mag (1)
042416 week7 powerpoint elec_mag (1)
 
042416 week7 elec_magnet
042416 week7 elec_magnet042416 week7 elec_magnet
042416 week7 elec_magnet
 

Recently uploaded

The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxRoyAbrique
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfUmakantAnnand
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxOH TEIK BIN
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdfClass 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdfakmcokerachita
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppCeline George
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSDStaff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdfClass 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 

Ge273.u9.pp1

  • 1. 1 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte
  • 2. 2 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte CHAPTER 7 Firms, the Stock Market, and Corporate Governance Fernando Quijano Prepared by: When Mark Zuckerberg started Facebook in 2004, he was still a sophomore in college. Just five years later, Facebook had 150 million users.
  • 3. 3 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte 7.1 Types of Firms Categorize the major types of firms in the United States. 7.2 The Structure of Corporations and the Principal–Agent Problem Describe the typical management structure of corporations and understand the concepts of separation of ownership from control and the principal–agent problem. 7.3 How Firms Raise Funds Explain how firms raise the funds they need to operate and expand. 7.4 Using Financial Statements to Evaluate a Corporation Understand the information provided in corporations’ financial statements. 7.5 Corporate Governance Policy Understand the role of government in corporate governance. Appendix: Tools to Analyze Firms’ Financial Information Understand the concept of present value and the information contained on a firm’s income statement and balance sheet. Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives CHAPTER 7 Firms, the Stock Market, and Corporate Governance
  • 4. 4 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Types of Firms Sole proprietorship A firm owned by a single individual and not organized as a corporation. Partnership A firm owned jointly by two or more persons and not organized as a corporation. Corporation A legal form of business that provides owners with protection from losing more than their investment should the business fail. Categorize the major types of firms in the United States. 7.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 5. 5 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Asset Anything of value owned by a person or a firm. Limited liability The legal provision that shields owners of a corporation from losing more than they have invested in the firm. SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION ADVANTAGES • Control by owner • No layers of management • Ability to share work • Ability to share risks • Limited personal liability • Greater ability to raise funds DISADVANTAGES • Unlimited personal liability • Unlimited personal liability • Costly to organize • Limited ability to raise funds • Limited ability to raise funds • Possible double taxation of income Who Is Liable? Limited and Unlimited Liability Table 7-1 Differences among Business Organizations Categorize the major types of firms in the United States. 7.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Types of Firms
  • 6. 6 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Types of Firms Corporations Earn the Majority of Revenue and Profits FIGURE 7-1 Business Organizations: Sole Proprietorships, Partnerships, and Corporations The three types of firms in the United States are sole proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. Panel (a) shows that only 19 percent of all firms are corporations. Yet, as panels (b) and (c) show, corporations account for a large majority of the total revenue and profits earned by all firms. Categorize the major types of firms in the United States. 7.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 7. 7 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte How Important Are Small Businesses to the U.S. Economy? Making the Connection In a typical year, 40 percent of new jobs are created by small firms like Yelp.com, which is a community-based review and directory website founded by Jeremy Stoppelman, left, and Russel Simmons. YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 1.6 at the end of this chapter. Entrepreneurs founding small firms have been the source of many of the most important new goods and services available to consumers. Categorize the major types of firms in the United States. 7.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 8. 8 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte The Structure of Corporations and the Principal–Agent Problem Corporate Structure and Corporate Governance Separation of ownership from control A situation in a corporation in which the top management, rather than the shareholders, control day-to-day operations. Corporate governance The way in which a corporation is structured and the effect a corporation’s structure has on the firm’s behavior. Principal–agent problem A problem caused by an agent pursuing his own interests rather than the interests of the principal who hired him. Describe the typical management structure of corporations and understand the concepts of separation of ownership from control and the principal–agent problem. 7.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 9. 9 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Solved Problem 7-2 Does the Principal–Agent Problem Apply to the Relationship between Managers and Workers? Briefly explain whether you agree with the following argument: The principal–agent problem applies not just to the relationship between shareholders and top managers. It also applies to the relationship between managers and workers. Just as shareholders have trouble monitoring whether top managers are earning as much profit as possible, managers have trouble monitoring whether workers are working as hard as possible. YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problems 2.4 and 2.5 at the end of this chapter. Describe the typical management structure of corporations and understand the concepts of separation of ownership from control and the principal–agent problem. 7.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 10. 10 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte
  • 11. 11 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte
  • 12. 12 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte CHAPTER 12 Monopolistic Competition: The Competitive Model in a More Realistic Setting Fernando Quijano Prepared by: The coffeehouse market is competitive because it is inexpensive to open a new store. Hundreds of firms in the United States operate coffeehouses.
  • 13. 13 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Monopolistic Competition: The Competitive Model in a More Realistic Setting 12.1. Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm in a Monopolistically Competitive Market Explain why a monopolistically competitive firm has downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue curves. 12.2 How a Monopolistically Competitive Firm Maximizes Profit in the Short Run Explain how a monopolistically competitive firm maximizes profit in the short run. 12.3 What Happens to Profits in the Long Run? Analyze the situation of a monopolistically competitive firm in the long run. 12.4 Comparing Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition Compare the efficiency of monopolistic competition and perfect competition. 12.5 How Marketing Differentiates Products Define marketing and explain how firms use it to differentiate their products. 12.6 What Makes a Firm Successful? Identify the key factors that determine a firm’s success. Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives CHAPTER 12
  • 14. 14 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Monopolistic competition A market structure in which barriers to entry are low and many firms compete by selling similar, but not identical, products. Monopolistic Competition: The Competitive Model in a More Realistic Setting
  • 15. 15 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte The Demand Curve for a Monopolistically Competitive Firm FIGURE 12-1 The Downward-Sloping Demand for Caffè Lattes at a Starbucks Explain why a monopolistically competitive firm has downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue curves. 12.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm in a Monopolistically Competitive Market If a Starbucks increases the price of caffè lattes, it will lose some, but not all, of its customers. In this case, raising the price from $3.00 to $3.25 reduces the quantity of caffè lattes sold from 3,000 to 2,400. Therefore, unlike a perfect competitor, a Starbucks store faces a downward-sloping demand curve.
  • 16. 16 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Marginal Revenue for a Firm with a Downward-Sloping Demand Curve Table 12-1 CAFFÈ LATTES SOLD PER WEEK (Q) PRICE (P) TOTAL REVENUE (TR = P x Q) AVERAGE REVENUE (AR = TR/Q) MARGINAL REVENUE (MR = ΔTR/ΔQ) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 $6.00 5.50 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 $0.00 5.50 10.00 13.50 16.00 17.50 18.00 17.50 16.00 13.50 10.00 ― $5.50 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 ― $5.50 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 –0.50 –1.50 –2.50 –3.50 Explain why a monopolistically competitive firm has downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue curves. 12.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Demand and Marginal Revenue at a Starbucks Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm in a Monopolistically Competitive Market
  • 17. 17 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Marginal Revenue for a Firm with a Downward-Sloping Demand Curve FIGURE 12-2 How a Price Cut Affects a Firm’s Revenue Explain why a monopolistically competitive firm has downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue curves. 12.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE If the local Starbucks reduces the price of a caffè latte from $3.50 to $3.00, the number of caffè lattes it sells per week will increase from 5 to 6. Its marginal revenue from selling the sixth caffè latte will be $0.50, which is equal to the $3.00 additional revenue from selling 1 more caffè latte (the area of the green box) minus the $2.50 loss in revenue from selling the first 5 caffè lattes for $0.50 less each (the area of the red box). Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm in a Monopolistically Competitive Market
  • 18. 18 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte FIGURE 12-3 The Demand and Marginal Revenue Curves for a Monopolistically Competitive Firm Marginal Revenue for a Firm with a Downward-Sloping Demand Curve Any firm that has the ability to affect the price of the product it sells will have a marginal revenue curve that is below its demand curve. We plot the data from Table 12-1 to create the demand and marginal revenue curves. After the sixth caffè latte, marginal revenue becomes negative because the additional revenue received from selling 1 more caffè latte is smaller than the revenue lost from receiving a lower price on the caffè lattes that could have been sold at the original price. Explain why a monopolistically competitive firm has downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue curves. 12.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Demand and Marginal Revenue for a Firm in a Monopolistically Competitive Market
  • 19. 19 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte How a Monopolistically Competitive Firm Maximizes Profit in the Short Run FIGURE 12-4 Maximizing Profit in a Monopolistically Competitive Market Explain how a monopolistically competitive firm maximizes profit in the short run. 12.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 20. 20 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Will Apple maximize profits if it produces 800,000 iPhones per month? Does Minimizing Cost Maximize Profits? Solved Problem 12-2 Average cost reaches a minimum at a quantity of 800,000, but profits are maximized at a quantity of 600,000. YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problem 2.6 at the end of this chapter. Explain how a monopolistically competitive firm maximizes profit in the short run. 12.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 21. 21 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte What Happens to Profits in the Long Run? How Does the Entry of New Firms Affect the Profits of Existing Firms? FIGURE 12-5 How Entry of New Firms Eliminates Profits Panel (a) shows that in the short run Starbucks can charge a price above average total cost (point A) and make a profit, shown by the green rectangle. But this profit attracts new firms to enter the market, which shifts the demand and marginal revenue curves to the curves labeled “Long run” in panel (b). At point B, Starbucks breaks even. Analyze the situation of a monopolistically competitive firm in the long run. 12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 22. 22 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Table 12-2 The Short Run and the Long Run for a Monopolistically Competitive Firm How Does the Entry of New Firms Affect the Profits of Existing Firms? What Happens to Profits in the Long Run? Analyze the situation of a monopolistically competitive firm in the long run. 12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 23. 23 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte The Rise and Decline of Starbucks Making the Connection YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 3.6 at the end of this chapter. Starbucks: No longer different enough? In a monopolistically competitive industry, maintaining profits in the long run is very difficult. Analyze the situation of a monopolistically competitive firm in the long run. 12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 24. 24 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Is Zero Economic Profit Inevitable in the Long Run? What Happens to Profits in the Long Run? A firm’s profits will be eliminated in the long run only if a firm stands still and fails to find new ways of differentiating its product or fails to find new ways of lowering the cost of producing its product. Analyze the situation of a monopolistically competitive firm in the long run. 12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Don’t Let This Happen to YOU! Don’t Confuse Zero Economic Profit with Zero Accounting Profit YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 3.4 at the end of this chapter.
  • 25. 25 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Can It Be Profitable to Be the High-Price Seller? Solved Problem 12-3 YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problem 3.7 at the end of this chapter. Because the greater demand more than offsets the higher costs, the hhgregg store makes a larger profit. Analyze the situation of a monopolistically competitive firm in the long run. 12.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 26. 26 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte • Monopolistically competitive firms charge a price greater than marginal cost. • Monopolistically competitive firms do not produce at minimum average total cost. Monopolistic competition and perfect competition share the characteristic that in long-run equilibrium, firms earn zero economic profits. However, there are two important differences between long- run equilibrium in the two markets: Compare the efficiency of monopolistic competition and perfect competition. 12.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Comparing Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition
  • 27. 27 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Excess Capacity under Monopolistic Competition FIGURE 12-6 Comparing Long-Run Equilibrium under Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition Comparing Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition A monopolistically competitive firm has excess capacity: If it increased its output, it could produce at a lower average cost. Compare the efficiency of monopolistic competition and perfect competition. 12.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 28. 28 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Economists have debated whether monopolistically competitive markets being neither productively nor allocatively efficient results in a significant loss of well-being to society in these markets compared with perfectly competitive markets. How Consumers Benefit from Monopolistic Competition Consumers benefit from being able to purchase a product that is differentiated and more closely suited to their tastes. Is Monopolistic Competition Inefficient? Compare the efficiency of monopolistic competition and perfect competition. 12.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Comparing Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition
  • 29. 29 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Abercrombie & Fitch: Can the Product Be Too Differentiated? Did Abercrombie and Fitch narrow its target market too much? Making the Connection YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 4.6 at the end of this chapter. Compare the efficiency of monopolistic competition and perfect competition. 12.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE A firm whose strategy of product differentiation succeeds will experience increases in same-store sales.
  • 30. 30 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte How Marketing Differentiates Products Marketing All the activities necessary for a firm to sell a product to a consumer. Brand Management Brand management The actions of a firm intended to maintain the differentiation of a product over time. Define marketing and explain how firms use it to differentiate their products. 12.5 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 31. 31 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte If the increase in revenue that results from the advertising is greater than the increase in costs, the firm’s profits will rise. Advertising How Marketing Differentiates Products Define marketing and explain how firms use it to differentiate their products. 12.5 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Defending a Brand Name A firm can apply for a trademark, which grants legal protection against other firms using its product’s name.
  • 32. 32 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Google Tries (and Fails) to Measure the Effectiveness of Radio Advertising Making the Connection Does spending on radio advertising attract customers? YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 5.7 at the end of this chapter. Define marketing and explain how firms use it to differentiate their products. A firm’s optimal level of advertising occurs where the marginal cost of advertising equals the marginal revenue earned from advertising. 12.5 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 33. 33 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte What Makes a Firm Successful? FIGURE 12-7 What Makes a Firm Successful? Identify the key factors that determine a firm’s success. 12.6 LEARNING OBJECTIVE The factors under a firm’s control—the ability to differentiate its product and the ability to produce it at lower cost— combine with the factors beyond its control to determine the firm’s profitability.
  • 34. 34 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Although not first to market, Bic ultimately was more successful than the firm that pioneered ballpoint pens. Is Being the First Firm in the Market a Key to Success? Making the Connection YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 6.6 at the end of this chapter. Identify the key factors that determine a firm’s success. 12.6 LEARNING OBJECTIVE The firms that were first to introduce a product ultimately lost out to latecomers who did a better job of providing consumers with products that were more reliable, less expensive, more convenient, or otherwise provided greater value.
  • 35. 35 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Starbucks Faces McCompetition AN INSIDE LOOK >> The effect of entry on price, quantity, and profits at Starbucks.
  • 36. 36 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte
  • 37. 37 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte CHAPTER 13 Oligopoly: Firms in Less Competitive Markets Fernando Quijano Prepared by: Today, in the software and computer industries, fewer than 10 firms account for the great majority of sales.
  • 38. 38 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte CHAPTER 13 Oligopoly: Firms in Less Competitive Markets 13.1 Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry Show how barriers to entry explain the existence of oligopolies. 13.2 Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.3 Sequential Games and Business Strategy Use sequential games to analyze business strategies. 13.4 The Five Competitive Forces Model Use the five competitive forces model to analyze competition in an industry. Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives
  • 39. 39 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Oligopoly: Firms in Less Competitive Markets Oligopoly A market structure in which a small number of interdependent firms compete.
  • 40. 40 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry RETAIL TRADE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY FOUR-FIRM CONCENTRATION RATIO INDUSTRY FOUR-FIRM CONCENTRATION RATIO Discount department stores 95% Cigarettes 95% Warehouse clubs and supercenters 92% Beer 91% Hobby, toy, and game stores 72% Aircraft 81% Athletic footwear stores 71% Breakfast cereal 78% College bookstores 70% Automobiles 76% Radio, television, and other electronic stores 69% Computers 75% Pharmacies and drugstores 53% Dog and cat food 64% Table 13-1 Examples of Oligopolies in Retail Trade and Manufacturing Show how barriers to entry explain the existence of oligopolies. 13.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 41. 41 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry Barriers to Entry Barrier to entry Anything that keeps new firms from entering an industry in which firms are earning economic profits. Economies of Scale Economies of scale The situation when a firm’s long-run average costs fall as it increases output. Show how barriers to entry explain the existence of oligopolies. 13.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 42. 42 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte FIGURE 13-1 Economies of Scale Help Determine the Extent of Competition in an Industry Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry Barriers to Entry Economies of Scale An industry will be competitive if the minimum point on the typical firm’s long-run average cost curve (LRAC1) occurs at a level of output that is a small fraction of total industry sales, such as Q1. The industry will be an oligopoly if the minimum point comes at a level of output that is a large fraction of industry sales, such as Q2. Show how barriers to entry explain the existence of oligopolies. 13.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 43. 43 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte If production of a good requires a particular input, then control of that input can be a barrier to entry. Government-Imposed Barriers Patent The exclusive right to a product for a period of 20 years from the date the product is invented. Oligopoly and Barriers to Entry Barriers to Entry Ownership of a Key Input Show how barriers to entry explain the existence of oligopolies. 13.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 44. 44 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly Game theory The study of how people make decisions in situations in which attaining their goals depends on their interactions with others; in economics, the study of the decisions of firms in industries where the profits of each firm depend on its interactions with other firms. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 45. 45 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly All games share three key characteristics: 1. Rules that determine what actions are allowable 2. Strategies that players employ to attain their objectives in the game 3. Payoffs that are the results of the interaction among the players’ strategies Business strategy Actions taken by a firm to achieve a goal, such as maximizing profits. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 46. 46 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly A Duopoly Game: Price Competition between Two Firms FIGURE 13-2 A Duopoly Game HP’s profits are in blue, and Apple’s profits are in red. HP and Apple would each make profits of $10 million per month on sales of desktop computers if they both charged $1,200. However, each firm has an incentive to undercut the other by charging a lower price. If both firms charge $1,000, they would each make a profit of only $7.5 million per month. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Don’t Let This Happen to YOU! Don’t Misunderstand Why Each Manager Ends Up Charging a Price of $1,000 YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 2.14 at the end of this chapter.
  • 47. 47 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Payoff matrix A table that shows the payoffs that each firm earns from every combination of strategies by the firms. Collusion An agreement among firms to charge the same price or otherwise not to compete. Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly A Duopoly Game: Price Competition between Two Firms Dominant strategy A strategy that is the best for a firm, no matter what strategies other firms use. Nash equilibrium A situation in which each firm chooses the best strategy, given the strategies chosen by other firms. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 48. 48 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Cooperative equilibrium An equilibrium in a game in which players cooperate to increase their mutual payoff. Noncooperative equilibrium An equilibrium in a game in which players do not cooperate but pursue their own self-interest. Prisoner’s dilemma A game in which pursuing dominant strategies results in noncooperation that leaves everyone worse off. Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly Firm Behavior and the Prisoner’s Dilemma Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 49. 49 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Solved Problem 13-2 Is Advertising a Prisoner’s Dilemma for Coca-Cola and Pepsi? Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problems 2.11, 2.12, and 2.13 at the end of this chapter. Given that Coca-Cola is advertising, Pepsi’s best strategy is to advertise. Therefore, advertising is the optimal decision for both firms, given the decision by the other firm.
  • 50. 50 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Is There a Dominant Strategy for Bidding on eBay? Making the Connection On eBay, bidding the maximum value you place on an item is a dominant strategy. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 2.15 at the end of this chapter.
  • 51. 51 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte FIGURE 13-3 Changing the Payoff Matrix in a Repeated Game Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly Can Firms Escape the Prisoner’s Dilemma? Wal-Mart and Target can change the payoff matrix for selling PlayStation 3 game consoles by advertising that they will match their competitor’s price. This retaliation strategy provides a signal that one store charging a lower price will be met automatically by the other store charging a lower price. In the payoff matrix in panel (a), there is no matching offer, and each store benefits if it charges $300 when the other charges $500. In the payoff matrix in panel (b), with the matching offer, the companies have only two choices: They can charge $500 and receive a profit of $10,000 per month, or they can charge $300 and receive a profit of $7,500 per month. The equilibrium shifts from the prisoner’s dilemma result of both stores charging the low price and receiving low profits to both stores charging the high price and receiving high profits. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 52. 52 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly Can Firms Escape the Prisoner’s Dilemma? Price leadership A form of implicit collusion in which one firm in an oligopoly announces a price change and the other firms in the industry match the change. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 53. 53 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte American Airlines and Northwest Airlines Fail to Cooperate on a Price Increase Making the Connection The airlines have trouble raising the price this business traveler pays for a ticket. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Airlines therefore continually adjust their prices while at the same time monitoring their rivals’ prices and retaliating against them either for cutting prices or failing to go along with price increases. YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problems 2.17 and 2.18 at the end of this chapter.
  • 54. 54 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte FIGURE 13-4 Oil Prices, 1972 to mid– 2009 Cartel A group of firms that collude by agreeing to restrict output to increase prices and profits. Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly Cartels: The Case of OPEC The blue line shows the price of a barrel of oil in each year. The red line measures the price of a barrel of oil in terms of the purchasing power of the dollar in 2009. By reducing oil production, OPEC was able to raise the world price of oil in the mid-1970s and early 1980s. Sustaining high prices has been difficult over the long run, however, because members often exceed their output quotas. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 55. 55 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte FIGURE 13-5 The OPEC Cartel with Unequal Members Using Game Theory to Analyze Oligopoly Cartels: The Case of OPEC Because Saudi Arabia can produce much more oil than Nigeria, its output decisions have a much larger effect on the price of oil. In the figure, Low Output corresponds to cooperating with the OPEC-assigned output quota, and High Output corresponds to producing at maximum capacity. Saudi Arabia has a dominant strategy to cooperate and produce a low output. Nigeria, however, has a dominant strategy not to cooperate and instead produce a high output. Therefore, the equilibrium of this game will occur with Saudi Arabia producing a low output and Nigeria producing a high output. Use game theory to analyze the strategies of oligopolistic firms. 13.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 56. 56 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte FIGURE 13-6 The Decision Tree for an Entry Game Sequential Games and Business Strategy Deterring Entry HP earns its highest return if it charges $600 for its netbook and Apple does not enter the market. But at that price, Apple will enter the market, and HP will earn only 16 percent. If HP charges $275, Apple will not enter because Apple will suffer an economic loss by receiving only a 5 percent return on its investment. Therefore, HP’s best decision is to deter Apple’s entry by charging $275. HP will earn an economic profit by receiving a 20 percent return on its investment. Note that the dashes indicate the situation where Apple does not enter the market, and so makes no investment and receives no return. Use sequential games to analyze business strategies. 13.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 57. 57 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Solved Problem 13-3 Is Deterring Entry Always a Good Idea? Use sequential games to analyze business strategies. 13.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE YOUR TURN: For more practice, do related problem 3.3 at the end of this chapter. Deterrence is worth pursuing only if the payoff is higher than for other strategies. In this case, expanding the market for netbooks by charging a lower price has a higher payoff, even given that Apple will enter the market.
  • 58. 58 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte FIGURE 13-7 The Decision Tree for a Bargaining Game Sequential Games and Business Strategy Bargaining Dell earns the highest profit if it offers a contract price of $20 per copy and TruImage accepts the contract. TruImage earns the highest profit if Dell offers it a contract of $30 per copy and it accepts the contract. TruImage may attempt to bargain by threatening to reject a $20-per-copy contract. But Dell knows this threat is not credible because once Dell has offered a $20-per-copy contract, TruImage’s profits are higher if it accepts the contract than if it rejects it. Use sequential games to analyze business strategies. 13.3 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 59. 59 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte FIGURE 13-8 The Five Competitive Forces Model The Five Competitive Forces Model Michael Porter’s model identifies five forces that determine the level of competition in an industry: (1) competition from existing firms, (2) the threat from new entrants, (3) competition from substitute goods or services, (4) the bargaining power of buyers, and (5) the bargaining power of suppliers. Use the five competitive forces model to analyze competition in an industry. 13.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 60. 60 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Competition among firms in an industry can lower prices and profits. Competition in the form of advertising, better customer service, or longer warranties can also reduce profits by raising costs. Firms face competition from companies that currently are not in the market but might enter. We have already seen how actions taken to deter entry can reduce profits. The Five Competitive Forces Model Competition from Existing Firms The Threat from Potential Entrants Use the five competitive forces model to analyze competition in an industry. 13.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 61. 61 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Firms are always vulnerable to competitors introducing a new product that fills a consumer need better than their current product does. If buyers have enough bargaining power, they can insist on lower prices, higher-quality products, or additional services. If many firms can supply an input and the input is not specialized, the suppliers are unlikely to have the bargaining power to limit a firm’s profits. The Five Competitive Forces Model Competition from Substitute Goods or Services The Bargaining Power of Buyers The Bargaining Power of Suppliers Use the five competitive forces model to analyze competition in an industry. 13.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE
  • 62. 62 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Can We Predict Which Firms Will Continue to Be Successful? Making the Connection Unfortunately, Circuit City’s excellence as a company didn’t last. Use the five competitive forces model to analyze competition in an industry. 13.4 LEARNING OBJECTIVE Is it possible to draw general conclusions about which business strategies are likely to be successful in the future? YOUR TURN: Test your understanding by doing related problem 4.5 at the end of this chapter.
  • 63. 63 of 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Microeconomics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapte Hewlett-Packard Uses New Technology to Boost Sales of Personal Computers AN INSIDE LOOK >> Dell decides whether to sell touch-sensitive personal computers.