This document is an economics analysis assignment submitted by Gaurav Kumar Shivhare to Mamta Pankaj Jain. It analyzes GDP, GNP, and per capita income data from 2006-2011 for an unnamed country. It shows that GDP, GNP, and per capita income all increased each year during this period. However, GDP alone cannot be used as an indicator of welfare, as it only indicates the size of the economy and not how income is distributed.

1. ASSIGNMENT NO.2
ALLOTED SERIAL NO.5
YEARS FROM-2006-2011
AMITY BUSINESS SCHOOL(AUR)
SUB: ECONOMIES ANALYSIS
DATE:18/11/2011
SUBMITTED TO: PRESENTED BY: GAURAV KUMAR
MAMTA PANKAJ JAIN SHIVHARE
ABS(AUR) MBA GENERAL 1ST SEM

2. GROWTH
GROWTH GROWTH
PER CAPITA RATE OF PER
year GDPfc GNPfc RATE OF RATE OF
INCOME CAPITA
GNPfc GDPfc
INCOME
2006-07 3566011 3536496 31520
9.34 8.22
2007-08 3898958 3881779 34111 9.76
6.58 6.76 5.10
2008-09 4162509 4137125 35850
7.92 7.96 6.45
2009-10 4493743 4464854 38161
8.28 8.55 6.82
2010-11

5. ANALYSIS
Its obvious that per capita income also show same pattern as its
measured by dividing NNP by number of people.
GDP and GNP have same concept, the difference is only that GNP
include the income earned by resident from abroad (NFIA).
From 1990 to 2000 both GDP and GNP is growing continuously.

6. NO, GDP CAN NOT BE TAKEN AS
INDICATOR OF WELFARE.
GDP ONLY INDICATE THE ECONOMY OF
SPECIFIC COUNTRY.

7. THANK YOU
BY-GAURAV KUMAR SHIVHARE