Gap data updated1
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•586 views
Gap data in enrollment in virtual and on-line credit recovery courses
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (15)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Gap data updated1
- 2. Enrollment by Ethnicity Black Hispanic Asian Other(Indian, Mixed,PI) White Enrollment by Gender Male Female Enrollment by SES Free/Red Pay
- 3. 74.48 82.1 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 Male Female Achievement by Gender 74.76 72.18 87.79 78.97 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 Black Hispanic Asian White Achievement by Ethnicity 74.69 79.61 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 F/R Pay Achievement bv SES
- 4. 40 28 Enrollment by Gender Male Female 16 14 38 Enrollment by Ethnicity Black Hisp/Other White 3434 Enrollment by SES F/R Pay
- 5. 16.5 15.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Male Female Number of Credits Earned by Gender 0 5 10 15 20 25 Black Hisp White Number of Credits Earned by Ethnicity 18 18 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 F/R Pay Credits Earned by SES
- 6. 124 99 Personal Finance Enrollment by Gender Female Male 57 166 Personal Finance Enrollment by Race Ethnic White 38 185 Personal Finance Enrollment by SES F/R Pay 80.48 82.6 77.82 77.16 81.62 73.05 82.05 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 Avg. Gr. Female Male Ethnic White F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroups
- 7. 46 41 Wellness Enrollment by Gender Female Male 29 56 Wellness Enrollment by Ethnicity Ethnic White 22 65 Wellness Enrollment by SES F/R Pay 80.18 83.9 75.9 81.27 79.63 74.95 81.74 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 Avg. Gr. Female Male Ethnic White F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroups
- 8. 18 12 Government Enrollment by Gender Male Female 6 12 Government Enrollment by Race Ethnic White 4 14 Government Enrollment by SES F/R Pay 77.94 70.5 81.66 74.66 79.58 80.25 77.28 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroup
- 9. 27 25 Enrollment by Gender Male Female 13 39 Enrollment by Race Ethnic White 9 43 Enrollment by SES F/R Pay 62.34 59.44 65.48 51.769 65.5 46.375 64.81 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroup
- 10. 13 15 Enrollment by Gender M F 24 4 Enrollment by Race W A 2 26 Enrollment by SES Free Pay 80.85 78.21 83.5 79.83 87 78.5 81 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 Avg. Grade Male Female White Ethnic(*) Free Pay Achievement by Subgroup
- 11. 5 7 Enrollment by Gender Male Female 2 10 Enrollment by Race Ethnic White Enrollment by SES Free/Red Pay 72.16 47 90.14 51.5 76.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Avg Grade Male Female Ethnic White Achievement by Subgroup
- 12. 8 5 Enrollment by Gender Male Female 5 8 Enrollment by Race Ethnic White 3 10 Enrollment by SES F/R Pay 56.24 54.91 58.37 76.46 43.6 81.22 48.75 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroup
- 13. 15 18 Enrollment by Gender Male Female 16 17 Enrollment by Race Ethnic White 13 20 Enrollment by SES F/R Pay 83.12 81.8 84.22 82.43 83.76 78.76 85.95 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroup
- 14. 6 7 Enrollment by Gender Male Female 3 10 Enrollment by Race Ethnic White 3 10 Enrollment by SES F/R Pay 94.15 91.5 96.42 93.66 94.3 92.33 94.16 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 Avg. Gr. Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroup
- 15. 66 Enrollment by Gender Male Female 2 10 Enrollment by Race Ethnic White 2 10 Enrollment by SES F/R Pay 82.58 78 87.16 96 79.9 95 80.1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Avg. Grade Male Female Ethnic White F/R Pay Achievement by Subgroups
- 16. 2 13 Enrollment by Gender Male Female 0 7 5 3 Enrollment by Race Black Asian Hispanic/Mixed White 5 10 Enrollment by SES Free/Red Pay 95.0667 92.5 95.46 93.57 96.4 96.33 95.6 94.8 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 Avg. Grade Male Female Black Asian Hispanic White Free/Red Pay Achievement by Subgroup
- 17. 8 0 Enrollment by Gender Male Female 2 6 Enrollment by Race Ethnic White 73.5 73.5 63.25 83.75 66 76 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Avg. Grade Male Free/Red Pay Black/Hisp White Achievement by Subgroup 44 Enrollment by SES F/R Pay
- 18. A pattern of females outperforming males, whites outperforming ethnic students Higher SES outperforming lower SES Under-represented groups not enrolling in virtual courses Under-represented groups over-represented in credit recovery What are the implications? What is our response? How do we close the gaps?
Editor's Notes
- Essential Question for Enrollment Gap: Are our ethnic and poorer students proportionately represented in online enrollment? Using 2013 student demographic data reported to DESE. 30% of our total enrollment enrolled in Virtual/Online courses that were not Credit Recovery/Edgenuity courses. Overall, a few more females enrolled in these courses than males. Our ethnic population is 28.2% and so is represented well in this enrollment at 29.5%. 70.48% of those taking virtual courses were White. Our Lower-Income students are under-represented as 20%of the enrollment in the virtual courses but 25.9% of our total enrollment.
- Essential Question for Achievement in Virtual Courses? Do our ethnic and poorer students perform at the same level as our white wealthier students? The average grade for all students all courses is 78.61%. Females out-performed males with an average of 82.1 to the males 74.48, a difference of over 7 percentage points. Black and Hispanic students achieved slightly below white students, while Asian students out-performed all student groups. Our lower-income students underperformed out wealthier students at 74.69 gr. Avg vs. a nearly 80% average, lower by nearly 5 percentage points and nearly one grade level.
- For Credit Recovery, our male students outnumber female students. Ethnic enrollment is over-represented at 44% compared with 28.2% of our total student population. Whites, with 67.8% of our total population comprise 55% of the enrollment in CR courses. Unbelievable, the SES enrollment is split 50-50, but only 25.9% of our students are F/R lunch while here they account for 50% of the enrollment.
- A total of 36 credits were earned during this time-some full, some ½ credits. At first glance, it would seem males and females achieved equally well with the males just edging out the females, but not considering there were 40 males and 28 females. Whites earned double the number of credits as black students and four times as many as Hispanic/Other students, but they also held 55% of the enrollment. Ethnic students made up 44% of the enrollment and earned 41.66% of the credits with Hispanic students achieving ½ the # of credits as Black students, despite fairly balanced enrollment. Surprisingly, Credits earned by SES were equal, just as the enrollment.
- PF has one of our largest enrollments with 223 total. Females edge outnumber males in PF enrollment, as do White to Ethnic students and Higher SES to lower SES. And again, females, whites, and higher SES students out-perform male, thenic, and lower SES respectively.
- Wellness is one of our larger enrollments with 87 total. Females edge out males in enrollment, white dominates ethnicity and higher income students over F/R. With an average grade of 80.18%, Females outperformed males by 8 percentage points, ethnic students actually edged out white students, but higher income students outperformed lower-income students at nearly 7 percentage points.
- Govt. has an enrollment of 36 and here, there are some slight variances from the previous classes. Males still underperform compared to female students, and whites outperform ethnic students, but lower SES outperforms higher SES by nearly 3 percentage points.
- In AMH, females outperform males, whites the ethnic students, and higher SES the lower SES. Interesting to note the average grade is a 62% in this group/course, as opposed to higher averages in the high 70s low 80s in other courses.
- In AP stats, there is fairly equal gender enrollment, but again, the females outperform the males. However, in this case, ethnic students had a higher average grade than white students, although it should be noted the only ethnicity in this group is Asian. Higher SES achieves higher than lower SES.
- An interesting notes about this course/group-No lower SES subgroup; all students pay for their lunch. Female and White students FAR outperform the males and ethnic students by 20 perecentage points and higher.
- More males than females in this group. Same with White to Ethnic students and Higher income students outnumber lower SES 3x. The average grade here is a failing grade, which one doesn’t usually see. Also, ethnic students and lower SES students far outperform their white and higher-income counterparts. Females still outperformed males, however.
- Enrollment by gender, race, and SES is balanced in this group/course, but the achievement patters persist with females, whites, and wealthier students having higher average grades than male, ethnic, and poorer students, although by somewhat narrow margins and all still with a B average, with the exception of lower SES students.
- This small, summer-school course reflects the similar pattern we have seen: Female students dominate achievement as do white students are higher-income students, although by smaller margins and all in a high grade average at 90+%.
- Some differences in this group are that ethnic and lower-income students significantly outperformed white and wealthier students. Females still out-achieved males. In all cases by a least a letter grade, 2 in the gender comparison.
- Female students outnumber and outperform male students. Interesting note is that White students are outnumbered in the ethnic student group, which also narrowly outperforms whites. Also, lower ses students edge out higher ses students.
- Game Design has no females enrolled at all and a 50-50 SES enrollment. Higher income students far outperform lower-income students and whites outperform ethnic students.