This document summarizes key concepts in concrete structural design including:
1) The working stress and limit state methods for design of reinforced concrete beams, slabs, and columns. It covers topics like modular ratio, neutral axis depth, reinforcement ratios, and shear design.
2) Design considerations for different structural elements like singly and doubly reinforced beams, T-beams, and columns. It provides equations for calculating load capacity.
3) Additional topics on bond, anchorage, development length, and effective spans for different support conditions.
This ppt is more useful for Civil Engineering students.
I have prepared this ppt during my college days as a part of semester evaluation . Hope this will help to current civil students for their ppt presentations and in many more activities as a part of their semester assessments.
I have prepared this ppt as per the syllabus concerned in the particular topic of the subject, so one can directly use it just by editing their names.
check it out: http://goo.gl/vqNk7m
CADmantra Technologies pvt. Ltd. is a CAD Training institute specilized in producing quality and high standard education and training. We are providing a perfact institute for the students intersted in CAD courses CADmantra is established by a group of engineers to devlop good training system in the field of CAD/CAM/CAE, these courses are widely accepted worldwide.
#catiatraining
#ANSYS #CRE-O
#hypermesh
#Automobileworkshops
#enginedevelopment
#autocad
#sketching
this slide will clear all the topics and problem related to singly reinforced beam by limit state method, things are explained with diagrams , easy to understand .
This ppt is more useful for Civil Engineering students.
I have prepared this ppt during my college days as a part of semester evaluation . Hope this will help to current civil students for their ppt presentations and in many more activities as a part of their semester assessments.
I have prepared this ppt as per the syllabus concerned in the particular topic of the subject, so one can directly use it just by editing their names.
check it out: http://goo.gl/vqNk7m
CADmantra Technologies pvt. Ltd. is a CAD Training institute specilized in producing quality and high standard education and training. We are providing a perfact institute for the students intersted in CAD courses CADmantra is established by a group of engineers to devlop good training system in the field of CAD/CAM/CAE, these courses are widely accepted worldwide.
#catiatraining
#ANSYS #CRE-O
#hypermesh
#Automobileworkshops
#enginedevelopment
#autocad
#sketching
this slide will clear all the topics and problem related to singly reinforced beam by limit state method, things are explained with diagrams , easy to understand .
Sheryar Bismil
Student of Mirpur University of Science & Technology(MUST).
Student of Final Year Civil Engineering Department Main campus Mirpur.
Here we Gonna to learn about the basic to depth wise study of Plan Reinforced Concrete-i.
From basis terminology to wide information about the analysis and design of Concrete member like column,Beam,Slab,etc.
This is first or introductory lecture of Mechanics of Solids-1 as per curriculum formulated by Higher Education Commission and Pakistan Engineering Council
Prepared by madam rafia firdous. She is a lecturer and instructor in subject of Plain and Reinforcement concrete at University of South Asia LAHORE,PAKISTAN.
Sheryar Bismil
Student of Mirpur University of Science & Technology(MUST).
Student of Final Year Civil Engineering Department Main campus Mirpur.
Here we Gonna to learn about the basic to depth wise study of Plan Reinforced Concrete-i.
From basis terminology to wide information about the analysis and design of Concrete member like column,Beam,Slab,etc.
This is first or introductory lecture of Mechanics of Solids-1 as per curriculum formulated by Higher Education Commission and Pakistan Engineering Council
Prepared by madam rafia firdous. She is a lecturer and instructor in subject of Plain and Reinforcement concrete at University of South Asia LAHORE,PAKISTAN.
Transforming Brand Perception and Boosting Profitabilityaaryangarg12
In today's digital era, the dynamics of brand perception, consumer behavior, and profitability have been profoundly reshaped by the synergy of branding, social media, and website design. This research paper investigates the transformative power of these elements in influencing how individuals perceive brands and products and how this transformation can be harnessed to drive sales and profitability for businesses.
Through an exploration of brand psychology and consumer behavior, this study sheds light on the intricate ways in which effective branding strategies, strategic social media engagement, and user-centric website design contribute to altering consumers' perceptions. We delve into the principles that underlie successful brand transformations, examining how visual identity, messaging, and storytelling can captivate and resonate with target audiences.
Methodologically, this research employs a comprehensive approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses. Real-world case studies illustrate the impact of branding, social media campaigns, and website redesigns on consumer perception, sales figures, and profitability. We assess the various metrics, including brand awareness, customer engagement, conversion rates, and revenue growth, to measure the effectiveness of these strategies.
The results underscore the pivotal role of cohesive branding, social media influence, and website usability in shaping positive brand perceptions, influencing consumer decisions, and ultimately bolstering sales and profitability. This paper provides actionable insights and strategic recommendations for businesses seeking to leverage branding, social media, and website design as potent tools to enhance their market position and financial success.
Hello everyone! I am thrilled to present my latest portfolio on LinkedIn, marking the culmination of my architectural journey thus far. Over the span of five years, I've been fortunate to acquire a wealth of knowledge under the guidance of esteemed professors and industry mentors. From rigorous academic pursuits to practical engagements, each experience has contributed to my growth and refinement as an architecture student. This portfolio not only showcases my projects but also underscores my attention to detail and to innovative architecture as a profession.
White wonder, Work developed by Eva TschoppMansi Shah
White Wonder by Eva Tschopp
A tale about our culture around the use of fertilizers and pesticides visiting small farms around Ahmedabad in Matar and Shilaj.
Can AI do good? at 'offtheCanvas' India HCI preludeAlan Dix
Invited talk at 'offtheCanvas' IndiaHCI prelude, 29th June 2024.
https://www.alandix.com/academic/talks/offtheCanvas-IndiaHCI2024/
The world is being changed fundamentally by AI and we are constantly faced with newspaper headlines about its harmful effects. However, there is also the potential to both ameliorate theses harms and use the new abilities of AI to transform society for the good. Can you make the difference?
1. Short Notes on Concrete Structures
Working Stress Method
Modular Ratio
S
C
E
m
E
=
o m = Modular ratio
o ES = Modulus of elasticity of steel
o EC = Modulus of elasticity of concrete
Equivalent Area of Concrete
C S
A mA
=
o AC = Area of concrete
o AS = Area of steel
Critical Depth of Neutral Axis (XC)
C
mc
X d
t mc
æ ö
÷
ç
= ÷
ç ÷
÷
ç
è ø
+
Here, D = Overall depth
d = Efffective depth
cbc
s = c = permissible stress in concrete
st
s = t = permissible stress in steel
Actual depth of Neutral axis (Xa)
2
( )
2
a
st a
BX
mA d x
= -
Special case :
(i) when a c
X X
= for balanced section
(ii) when a c
X X
> for over reinforced section
(iii) when a c
X X
< for under reinforced section
Doubly Reinforced Rectangular Section
Critical depth of Neutral axis, (XC)
C
mc
X d
t mc
= ⋅
+
Actual depth of Neutral axis, (Xa)
2
(1.5 1) ( ) ( )
2
a
SC a c st a
bX
m A X d mA d x
+ - - = -
2. Singly Reinforced T‐Section
Effective width of flange
For beam casted monolithic with slab
0
1 2
6
6
2 2
w f
f
w
l
b d
B Minimum or
l l
b
ìæ ö
ï ÷
ïç ÷
+ +
ïç ÷
ç
ï ÷
ç
è ø
ï
ï
ï
ï
= í
ï
ï
ï
ï + +
ï
ï
ï
ï
î
For isolated T‐beam
0
0
4
f w
l
B b
l
B
= +
æ ö
÷
ç + ÷
ç ÷
ç ÷
è ø
l0 = Distance between points of zero moments in the beam
B = Total width of flange
bw = Width of web
Critical depth of Neutral axis (Xc)
C
mc
X d
t mc
æ ö
÷
ç
= ÷
ç ÷
÷
ç
è ø
+
When Neutral axis is in flange area
o Actual depth of Neutral axis
2
( )
2
a
st a
BX
mA d X
= -
Here, Xa = Actual depth of Neutral axis
Moment of resistance (Mr)
When Neutral axis is in web area
For actual depth of neutral axis
3. Moment of resistance (Mr)
Limit State Method
Design stress strain curve at ultimate state
Design value of strength
o For concrete
0.67
0.45
1.5
ck
d ck
mc
f
f
f f
g
= = =
mc
g = Partial factor of safety for concrete = 1.5
fd = design value of strength
o For steel
0.87
1.15
y
d y
f
f f
= =
Singly Reinforced Beam
Limiting depth of neutral axis (xu, lim)
,lim
700
0.87 1100
u
y
x d
f
= ´
+
Actual depth of neutral axis (Xu)
0.87
0.36
y st
u
ck
f A
C T X
f b
= =
Lever arm = d – 0.42 Xu
Ultimate moment of resistance
0.36 ( 0.42 )
u ck u u
M f bX d X
= -
0.87 ( 0.42 )
u y st u
M f A d X
= -
Special cases
1. Under‐reinforced section : Xu < Xu,lim
0.36 ( 0.42 )
u ck u u
M f bX d X
= -
0.87 ( 0.42 )
u y st u
M f A d X
= -
2. Balanced section: Xu = Xu,lim
,lim ,lim
0.36 ( 0.42 )
u ck u u
M f bX d X
= -
,lim
0.87 ( 0.42 )
u y st u
M f A d X
= -
3. Over reinforced section : Xu > Xu,lim
Xu limited to Xu,lim
Moment of resistance limited to (Mu,lim)
Doubly Reinforced Section
4. Limiting depth of neutral axis
,lim
700
0.87 1100
u
y
X d
f
= ´
+
For actual depth of neutral axis (Xu)
1 2
0.36 ( 0.45 ) 0.87
ck u sc ck sc y st
C T C C T
f bX f f A f A
= + =
+ - =
Ultimate moment of resistance
0.36 ( 0.42 ) ( 0.45 ) ( )
u ck u u sc ck sc C
M f bX d X f f A d d
= - + - -
fSC = stress in compression
T‐Beam
Limiting depth of neutral axis
,lim
700
0.87 1100
u
y
X d
f
= ´
+
Singly reinforced T‐Beam
o When NA is in flange area
Xu < Df
o
0.87
0.36
y st
u f
ck f
f A
X D
f b
= <
o Ultimate moment of resistance
0.36 ( 0.42 ) 0.87 ( 0.42 )
u ck f u u u y st u
M f b X d X or M f A d X
= - = -
o When NA is in web area
Xu > Df
Xu > Df and
3
7
f u
D X
<
For actual depth of neutral axis
0.36 0.45 ( ) 0.87
ck w u ck f w f y st
f b x f b b D f A
+ - =
Ultimate moment of resistance
0.36 ( 0.42 ) 0.45 ( )
2
f
u ck w u u ck f w f
D
M f b x d x f b b D d
æ ö
÷
ç
= - + - - ÷
ç ÷
ç ÷
è ø
1 2
0.87 ( 0.42 ) 0.87
2
f
u y st u y st
D
M f A d x f A d
æ ö
÷
ç
= - + - ÷
ç ÷
ç ÷
è ø
1 2
0.36 0.45 ( )
,
0.87 0.87
ck w u ck f w f
st st
y y
f b x f b b D
A A
f f
-
= =
When Xu > Df and
3
7
f u
D X
>
5. 0.15 0.65
f u f f
y X D D
= + <
For actual depth of neutral axis
1 2
0.36 0.45 ( ) 0.87 0.87
ck w u ck f w f y st y st
f b X f b b y f A f A
+ - = +
0.36 0.45 ( ) 0.87
ck w u ck f w f y st
f b X f b b y f A
+ - =
Design Beams and Slabs and Columns
Effective span
Simply supported beams and slabs (leff)
0
0
minimum
eff
l w
l
l d
ì +
ï
ï
= í
ï +
ï
î
Here, l0 = clear span
w = width of support
d = depth of beam or slab
For continuous beam
If width of support
1
12
< of clear span
0
0
minimum
eff
l w
l
l d
ì +
ï
ï
= í
ï +
ï
î
If width of support
1
12
> of clear span
o When one end fixed other end continuous or both end continuous.
leff = l0
o When one end continuous and other end simply supported
6. 0
0
/ 2
minimum
/ 2
eff
l w
l
l d
ì +
ï
ï
= í
ï +
ï
î
Cantilever
0
2
eff
d
l l
= +
0
2
eff
w
l l
æ ö
÷
ç
= + ÷
ç ÷
ç ÷
è ø
Frames
leff = Centre to centre distance
Support Condition Span/overall depth
Mild Steel Fe 415/Fe 500
Simply supported
Continuous
35
40
28
32
Slenderness limit
For simply supported or continuous beams
2
0
60
/ minimum
250
b
l b
d
ì
ï
ï
ï
ï
> í
ï
ï
ï
ï
î
l0 = Clear span
b = Width of the section
d = Effective depth
For cantilever beam
7. 2
0
25
/ minimum
100
b
l b
d
ì
ï
ï
ï
ï
> í
ï
ï
ï
ï
î
o Minimum tension reinforcement
0.85
st
y
A
bd f
=
o Maximum tension reinforcement = 0.04 bD
o Maximum compression reinforcement = 0.04 bD
where, D = overall depth of the section
o Nominal cover for different members
Beams 25 mm
Slab 20 to 30 mm
Column 40 mm
Foundations 50 mm
One way slab
2
y
x
l
l
>
ly = length of longer span
lx = length of shorter span
Columns
Working Stress Method
Slenderness ratio
dim
effective length
least lateral ension
l =
If 12
l > then the column is long.
Load carrying capacity for short column
sc sc cc c
P A A
s s
= +
AC = Area of concrete, C g SC
A A A
= -
SC
s = Stress in compression steel
CC
s = Stress in concrete
g
A = Total gross cross‐sectional area
SC
A = Area of compression steel
Load carrying capacity for long column
( )
r SC SC CC C
P C A A
s s
= +
Cr = Reduction factor
1.25
48
eff
r
l
C
B
= -
or
min
1.25
160
eff
r
l
C
i
= -
8. Effective length of Compression Members
Degree of End
Restraint of
compression
members
Symbol Theoretical value of
Effective Length
Recommended value
of Effective Length
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
Effectively held in
position and
restrained against
rotation in both ends
0.50 l 0.65 l
Effectively held in
position at both ends,
restrained against
rotation at one end
0.70 l 0.80 l
Effectively held in
position at both ends,
but not restrained
against rotation
1.00 l 1.00 l
Effectively held in
position and
restrained against
rotation at one end,
and at the other
restrained against
rotation but not held
in position
1.00 l 1.20 l
Effective held in
position and
restrained against
rotation in one end,
and at the other
partially restrained
against rotation but
not held in position
___ 1.50 l
Effectively held in
position at one end
but not restrained
against rotation, and
at the other end
restrained against
rotation but not held
in position
2.00 l 2.00 l
9. Effectively held in
position and
restrained against
rotation at one end
but not held in
position nor restrained
against rotation at the
other end.
2.00 l 2.00 l
Column with helical reinforcement
o 1.05( )
SC SC CC C
P A A
s s
= + for short column
o 1.05 ( )
r SC SC CC C
P C A A
s s
= + for long column
Longitudinal reinforcement
o Minimum area of steel = 0.8% of the gross area of column
o Maximum area of steel
When bars are not lapped Amax = 6% of the gross area of
column
When bars are lapped Amax = 4% of the gross area of column
Transverse reinforcement (Ties)
1
max 4
6
main
imum
mm
f
f
ì
ï
ï ⋅
ï
ï
= í
ï
ï
ï
ï
î
main
f = dia of main logitudnal bar
f = dia of bar for transverse reinforcement
Pitch (p)
min
leastlateraldimension
minimum 16
300 mm
f f
ì
ï
ï
ï
ï
= í
ï
ï
ï
ï
î
Helical reinforcement
o Diameters of helical reinforcement is selected such that
0.36 1
g ck h
C y C
A f V
A f V
é ù
ê ú
- £
ê ú
ë û
o
2
1000
( ) ( )
4
h h h
V d
P
p
p f
æ ö
÷
ç
= ÷
ç ÷
ç ÷
è ø
2
( )
4
C C
A d
p
=
1
C C
V A
= ´
dh = centre to centre dia of helix
= dg – 2 clear cover ‐ h
h
f = diameter of the steel bar forming the helix
10. Concentrically Loaded Columns
e = 0 ‐ column is truly axially loaded.
P 0.45 0.75
u ck c y SC
f A f A
= +
Bond, Anchorage and Development Length
Bond stress ( )
bd
t
bd
V
pjd
t =
å
V = Shear force at any section
d = Effective depth of the section
p
å = Sum of all perimeter of reinforcement
= ( )
n p f
⋅
n = Number of reinforcement
f = diameter of reinforcement
Development Length (Ld)
4
st
d
bd
L
fs
t
=
⋅
For WSM
0.87
4
y
d
bd
f
L
f
t
⋅
=
⋅
For LSM
Shear stress
For Homogeneous beam
V
q AY
lb
= ⋅
q = shear stress at any section
V = shear force at any section
AY = Moment of area of section above the point of consideration
I = Moment of inertia of section
3
12
bD
=
For Reinforced concrete beam
o Shear stress above NA
2 2
( )
2
a
V
q x y
l
= ⋅ -
2
max
2
a
V
q x
l
= ⋅ at y = 0
o Shear stress below NA
11. V
q
bjd
=
Nominal shear stress
V
V
bd
t =
Minimum shear reinforcement
o For WSM and LSM
o
0.4
0.87
SV
V y
A
bS f
³
o
2.175 y SV
V
f A
S
b
£
ASV = Area of shear reinforcement
SV = Spacing for shear reinforcement
Spacing of shear reinforcement
o
2.175 y SV
V
f A
S
b
=
Inclined stirrups
(sin cos )
S SV SV
V
d
V A
S
s a a
æ ö
÷
ç ÷
= ⋅ ⋅ + ç ÷
ç ÷
÷
ç
è ø
for WSM
(0.87 )(sin cos )
Su SV y
V
d
V A f
S
a a
æ ö
÷
ç ÷
= ⋅ + ç ÷
ç ÷
÷
ç
è ø
LSM
Pre‐stress Concrete
Analysis of prestress and Bending stress
Stress concept Method
Beam provided with a concentric tendon :
o Direct compressive force :
a
P
f
A
=
.
o Extreme stresses due to bending moment alone :
0
M
f
Z
=
o Stress at the extreme top edge :
P M
A Z
+
o Stress at the extreme bottom edge :
P M
A Z
-
Beams with eccentrics tendon :
12. Direct stresses due to prestressing force:
P
A
+
Extreme stresses due to eccentricity of the prestressing force :
.
P e
Z
Extreme stresses due to bending moment :
M
Z
Stress at top fiber
.
P P e M
A Z Z
= - +
Stress at bottom fibre
.
P P e M
A Z Z
= + -
Strength Concept method
If the beam is subjected to a bending moment M, then the C‐line will be
shifted from the P‐line by a distance 'a' called lever arm.
M M
a
P C
= =
Extreme stresses in concrete are given by
C C eccentricity of C
A Z
´
=
Load Balancing Concept
Axial longitudinal force provided by the tendon =
cos
P q = P {since q is small}
Direct stress on the section
cos
P P
A A
q
= =
Net Bending Moment
2
( 2 sin )
4 8
W P l wl
M
q
-
= +
Losses of Pre‐stress
Types of Losses Losses in pre‐tensioned
member
Losses in posttensioned
member
1. Loss of pre‐stress during
tensioning process due to
friction.
(a) Loss due to length effect
(b) Loss due to curvature effect
No Loss
No Loss
P0kx
0
P ma
13. (c) Loss due to both length and
curvature effect
No Loss
0( )
P kx ma
+
Here,
P0 = Pre‐stressing force at the
jacking end
K = Wobble friction factor
15 x 10‐4
per meter < K < 50 x 10‐
4
per meter.
= Cumulative angle in radians
through which tangent to the
cable profile has turned
between any two points under
consideration.
= Coefficient of friction in
curves
= 0.25 to 0.55
2. Loss of pre‐stress at the
anchoring stage
No Loss
S
l
E
l
D
⋅
Here,
l
D = effective slip of the wire.
l = Length of the tendon.
ES = Young's modulus for
tendon wires
3. Loss of pre‐stress occurring
Sub‐sequently
(a) Loss of stress due to
shrinkage of concrete
(b) Loss of stress due to creep
to concrete
(c) Loss of stress due to elastic
shortening of concrete
4
(3 10 ) S
E
-
´
Here,
ES = Young’s modulus for
tendon wire
C
m f
f ⋅ ⋅
Here,
m = Modular ratio
= ES/EC
fC = Original pre‐stress in
concrete at the level of steel
C
m f
⋅
Here
4
10
2 10
log ( 2)
S
E
T
´
⋅
+
Here
T = Age of concrete at the time
of transfer of stress (in days)
C
m f
f ⋅ ⋅
zero
it all the bars are tensioned at
same time
14. (d) Loss of stress due to creep
of steel or loss due to stress
relaxations.
C
f = Initial stress in concrete at
the level of steel.
1 to 5% of initial pre‐stress.
S
l
E
l
D
⋅ for subsequent
tensioning
1 to 5% of initial pre‐stress